Quick viewing(Text Mode)

HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Friday, July 20, 1973

HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Friday, July 20, 1973

25166 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE July 20, 1973

NOMINATIONS C ol. R oger Irvin M artin, Jr., S S N xxx-xx-x... MEDICAL CORPS xxx-... , O rdnance C orps. To be brigadier general Executive nominations received by the C oL Joseph H enry R itzen.hein, .S S N xxx-xx-x... Brig. G en. R obert Bernstein, xxx-xx-xxxx , Senate July 20, 1973: xxx-... , Infantry. C ol. Jam es R ead S tallings, S S N A rm y of the U nited S tates (colonel, M edical DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE xxx-xx-xx... C orps, U .S . A rmy). J. William M iddendorf II, of C onnecticut, xxx-... , M ilitary P olice C orps. M aj. G en . R ich ard R ay T ay lo r, xxx-xx-xxxx to be U nder S ecretary of the N avy, vice F rank T h e A rm y N atio n al G u ard o f th e U n ited S ta te s o ffic e rs n a m e d h e re in fo r pro m o tio n xxx... , A rm y o f th e U n ite d S ta te s (c o lo n e l, P . S an d ers, resign ed . as R eserve C om m issioned officers of the A rmy M edical C orps, U .S . A rmy) . DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY under the provisions of title 1 0, U nited S tates 1 . The following-named officer to be placed William L . G ifford, of N ew Y ork, to be a C ode, section 5 93(a ) and 3392 : o n th e retired list in grad e in d icated u n d er D epu ty U n d er S ecretary o f th e T reasu ry , v ice To be major general th e pro v isio n s o f title 10, U nited S tates C ode, Jam es E. S m ith . S ection 396 2 : C ol. T hom as S am s Bishop, S S N xxx-xx-xx... SECURIrir.S AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION To be lieutenant general xxx-x... , Infantry. T he following-nam ed persons to be m em - To be brigadier general L t. G en. H al Bruce Jennings, Jr., xxx-xx-x... b ers o f th e S ecu rities an d E x ch an ge C o m - xxx-... , A rm y of the U nited S tates (m ajor gen- C ol. 'C alvin H ubert L anning, S S N m ission for the terms indicated: xxx-xx-x... eral, U .S . A rmy). xxx-... , A rmor. F o r th e re m a in d e r o f th e te rm e x pirin g 2. M aj. G en. R ichard R ay T aylor, xxx-xx-x... - C ol. R ichard A ustin M iller, S S N June 5 , 1 976 : A . A . S ommer, Jr., of O hio, vice xxx-xx-x... xxx-x... , A rm y o f th e U n ited S tates (co lo n el, , Infantry. A . S ydney H erlong, Jr., resigned. xxx-x... U .S . A rm y) for appointm ent as the S urgeon F o r th e re m a in d e r o f th e te rm e x pirin g C ol. A lbert R oss M orris, Jr., S S N xxx-xx-x... - G eneral, 'U .S . A rm y, with the grade of lieu- , A rmor. June 5 , /977: R ay G arrett, Jr., of Illinois, vice xxx-... tenant general, under the provisions of title G . Bradford C ook, resigned. C ol. 'T homas M artin P hillips, S S N xxx-xx-x... 1 0, U nited S tates C ode, section 3036 . xxx-... , F ield A rtillery. IN THE NAVY C ol. C harles S um ner R eed, Jr., S S N xxx-... CONFIRMATIONS xxx-xx-xx... , C orps of E ngineers. C om dr. P aul J. Weitz, Jr., U .S . N avy, for C ol. C lyde C hester Wright, S S N xxx-xx-xx... perm anent prom otion to the grade of captain E xecutive nominations confirmed by xxx-... , Field A rtillery. in th e N a v y in a c c o rd a n c e with a rtic le I t, the Senate July 20, 1973: 1 . The following-named A rmy M edical D e- section 2 , clause 2 of the C onstitution. partm ent officers for tem porary appointm ent IN 'THE ARMY IN THE ARMY in th e A rm y o f th e U n ite d S ta te s , to th e A rm y n o m in a tio n s b e gin n in g J a c k H . T he U nited S tates A rm y R eserve officers gra d e s in d ic a te d , u n d e r th e pro v isio n s o f n a m e d h e re in fo r pro m o tio n a s R e s e rv e L each „ to b e co lo n el, an d en d in g A lan P. title 1 0, U nited S tates C ode, sections 3442 Smith, to be first lieutenant, which nom ina- C ommissioned officers of the A rmy, under the and 3447: tio n s were receiv ed b y th e S en ate an d ap- pro v isio n s o f title 1 0, U n ited S tates 'C o d e, MEDICAL CORPS section 5 93(a) and 3384: peared in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD on July To be major general 9,1 973. To be major general Brig. G en. R obert Bernstein, xxx-xx-xxxx , A rm y n o m in a tio n s b e gin n in g E a rle L . Brig. G en. E dward Irving C reed, S S N xxx-... A rm y of the U nited S tates (colonel, M edical D enton, to be lieutenant colonel, and ending xxx-xx-x... . C orps, U .S. A rmy) . John W. S agartz, to be captain, which nom i- Brig. G en . H erb ert M arsh all M artin , Jr„ Brig. G en. E dward H enry Vogel, Jr., xxx... nations were received by the S enate and 'ap- SSN xxx-xx-xxxx . xxx-xx-x... , M edical C orps, U.S. A rmy. peared in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD on July Brig. G en. R obert D arwin P artridge, S S N To be brigadier general 9,1 973. xxx-xx-xxxx A rm y n o m in atio n s b egin n in g D o n ald J. C ol. Kenneth R ay D irks, , A rmy To be brigadier general xxx-xx-xxxx .A cker, to be colonel, and ending Willard o f th e U n ite d S ta te s (lie u te n a n t c o lo n e l, Woodruff, Jr., to b e lie u te n a n t c o lo n e l. C ol. C hester L ee F inch, Jr., S S N xxx-xx-x... Medical C orps, U .S . A rmy). which nominations were received by the S en- xxx-... . C ivil A ffairs. C ol. G eorge S awyer Woodard, Jr xxx-xx-x... ate and appeared in the CONGRESSIONAL REc:- C ol. James William H oerner, S S N xxx-xx-x... - , Medical C orps, U .S. A rmy. xxx-... ORD on July 9,1 973. xxx-... , Infantry. C ol. S pencer Beal R eid, xxx-xx-xxxx , M ed- C ol. Jack Jew, S S N xxx-xx-xxxx M edical ical C orps, U .S . A rmy. IN THE NAVY C orps. C ol. William A lbert Boyson, xxx-xx-xxxx , N a v y n o m in a tio n s b e gin n in g Ja m e s R . C ol. F ranklin L ane M cKean, S S N xxx-xx-x... Medical C orps, U .S . A rmy. L ash, to be lieutenant com m ander, and end- , F ield A rtillery. xxx-... MEDICAL SERVICE CORPS ing T im othy H . M eyer, to be ensign, which C al. William A llen N ewton, Jr., S S N xxx-... n o m in a tio n s we re re c e iv e d b y th e S e n a te To be brigadier general xxx-xx-x... , Medical C orps. and appeared in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD C ol. Ben L ewis R ushing, S S N xxx-xx-xxxx C ol. John E dward H aggerty, xxx-xx-xxxx , on July 9,1 973. F ield A rtillery. M edical S ervice C orps, U .S A rmy. N avy nom inations beginning T im othy K. T h e A rm y N atio n al G u ard o f th e U n ited 2. T he following- nam ed officers for ap- M urphy, to be ensign, and ending M ichael S tates officers nam ed herein for prom otion pointment in the R egular A rmy of the U nited B. S anborn, to be ensign, which nom inations as R eserve C ommissioned officers of the A rmy S ta te s , to th e gra d e in d ic a te d , u n d e r th e were receiv ed b y th e S en ate an d appeared under the provisions of title 1 0, U nited S tates pro v isio n s o f title 1 0, U n ited S tates C o d e, C ode, section 5 93(a) and 3385 : in the 'C O N G R ESSIO N A L R EC O R D on July 13, sections 32 84 and 3307; To be major general 1973. MEDICAL CORPS IN THE MARINE CORPS Brig. G en. H oward G urney G arrison, S S N To be major general M arine C orps nom inations beginning A l- xxx-xx-xxxx M aj. G en. James A rista Wier, xxx-xx-xxxx bert W. C am pbell, to be colonel, and ending To be brigadier general A rm y o f th e U n ited S tates (b rigad ier gen - Walter F . Welch , to b e seco n d lieu ten an t, C ol. P letcher C lement Booker, Jr., S S N xxx-... eral, M edical C orps, U .S . A rm y) . which nominations were received by the S en- xxx-xx-x... , F ield A rtillery. M aj. 'G en. S purgeon H art N eel, Jr., xxx-... ate and appeared in the CONGRESSIONAL REC- Col. M ax A rna C reer, S S N 5 xxx-xx-xxxx , A rmy of the U nited S tates (brigadier oRD and July 9,1 973. F ield A rtillery. xxx-xx-x... general, Medical C orps, U .S . A rmy) . M arine C orps nom inations beginning Wil- C ol. Nicholas Joseph D el T ort° , S S N xxx-... T h e fo llo win g- n am ed o fficers fo r ap- liam R . A b ele, Jr., to b e m ajo r, an d en d in g xxx-xx-x... I nfantry. 3. pointment in the R egular A rmy of the U nited A rthur Vow, Jr., to be chief warrant officer C ol. William Paul H urley, S S N xxx-xx-xxxx I nfantry. S ta te s , to th e gra d e in d ic a te d , u n d e r th e (W-2 ), which nom inations were received by the S enate and appeared in the C O N G R E S - C ol. R obert E arl Johnson, Jr„ S S N xxx-xx-x... pro v isio n s o f title 1 0, U n ited S tates C o d e, xxx-... , Infantry. sections 32 84 and 3306 : SIONAL RECORD on July 9, 1 973.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Friday, July 20, 1973

The House met at 12 o'clock noon. come into the hearts of our people that D eliver us from pride of class, color, The Chia.plain, Rev. Edward G . Latch, by Thy grace we may be saved from evil or creed, and renew our spirits with D .D ., offered the following prayer: ways and may enter the open doors of truth and love that we m ay be doers a better and a higher life in Thy service. Keep th"g heart with all diligence; for of Thy word and not hearers only. out of 'it are the issues of life.-Proverbs D eliver us from an undue sense of our 4: 23. own importance and lead us to a greater D raw us closer to Thee and bind us A lmighty G od, our H eavenly F ather, concern about an increase of justice, together in the bonds of a common faith mercifully look upon our N ation and mercy, and truth in our land. and a common devotion that we may be July 20, 1973· CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE 25167 .

united · in spirit as we pr~laim liberty, 1 minute .and .ta revise and extend his A balanced budget -is what we need., , justice, and good will to all. remarks.> · Secretary Shultz said, and he called it , In Thy holy name we pray. Amen. Mr. STRA'I"TON. Mr. Speaker, I want that old basic religion. to bring to the attention of the House Mr. Speaker, it is going to take a lot the fact that the Senate yesterday passed more than faith healing to get this econ­ THE JOURNAL the legislative branch appropriation bill, omywell. The SPEAKER. The Chair has exam­ and in connection with the controversial ined the Journal of the last day's pro­ west front project came up with a really PROPOSED NEW RULES FOR THE ceedings and announces to the House his remarkable proposal, in fact a remark­ HOUSE approval thereof. able compromise solution to this issue. Without objection, the Journal stands First of all, they found out not only (Mr. VEYSEY asked and was given approved. that we can successfully restore the west permission to address the House for 1 There was no objection. front but we can restore .it for a mere $10 minute, to revise and extend his remarks, million. To be on the safe side they put and include extraneous matter.> $15 million for restoration in their bill. Mr. VEYSEY. Mr. Speaker, last night, MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Second, they have proposed an arrange­ in a flurry of confusion, the House ap­ A p1essage from the Senate ·by Mr. ment for providing three times the proved H.R. 8860, the farm bill, which Arrington, one of its clerks, announced needed office space to the House of Rep­ may dete.rmine the economic and phys::­ that the Senate had passed with amend­ resentatives in the Capitol vicinity at ical health of farmers and consumers iri. ments in which the concurrence of the just one-seventh of the cost which the this N.ation for 4 years. It is a safe l;>,et . House is requested, bills of the House of long-touted extension proposal would do. that not over a handful of Membe.rs . the fQllowing titles: Details of this remarkable compromise really ·knew .what was in the bill on final passage. There. was great difficulty , ~.R. 3630. An act tO extend.for 3 years the are contained in the RECORD for July 19, ;·iii period during which · certain dyeing and at pages 24831 and 24832. learnipg exactly what many of the ~8 · tallning materials may be imported free of I believe this remarkable recommenda­ amendments. reallY.. said. duty; tion deserves the most serious considera­ Frankly,. that is a dangerous situation H.R ~ 7935. An act to amend the Fair Labor tion by every Member of the House. I which causes the House to lose credibil­ Standards Act of 1938 to increase the mini­ hope the conference committee will con­ ity with the public. mum wage rates under that act, to expand I would like to propose two changes in the coverage of that act, and for other pur­ sider it very carefully and favorably, so poses: and we can preserve the Capitol, save the tax­ the rules to assist in orderly processing of H.R. 8070. An act to authorize grants for payers' money, and get all the additional complex legislation on the floor: vocational rehabilitation services, and for office ·space the House requires. First. Copies of all amendments should other purposes. be available to any Member desiring them at the time the amendment is The message also announced that the PERMISSION FOR COMMITTEE ON proposed. Senate agrees to the amendment of the FOREIGN AFFAIRS TO FILE RE- This would require that the amend- House to a bill of the Senate of the fol­ PORT ON H.R. 9360 ment be properly prepared. Fast copying lowing title: Mr. ZABLOCKI. Mr. Speaker, I ask machines at the desk should make copies S. 59. An act to amend title 38 of. the -unanimous consent that the Committee. readily available, and the c.hairman United States Code to provide improved and expanded medibal and nursing home care to on Foreign A1Iairs may have until mid- -should enforce the rule requiring avail- · veterans; to provide hospital ·and 'medical night tonight to file a report on the bill ability. · · · ' care to certain dependents and survivors of H.R. 9360. · Second. The bill should be in print veterans; to provide for improved structural The SPEAKER. Is there objection to with all amendments included before the ~ety of Veterans' Administration facilities: the request of the gentleman from vote on 'final passage is taken.- . tO iniprove recruitment and .retention of .Wisconsin? · This might mean 1 day of delay to get I career' persmme.l i~ tlie Department o{Med~- There was no objection. the amendments fitted-to the bill and .. in ·-' eine and Surgery; and ~or other __purposes. ·print. .' What difference would that make . The message also announced that the on a bill which was debated over a -PC­ Senate agrees to the report of the com­ MAJORITY LEADER THOMAS P. riod of a week? Again, fast copying rna­ mittee of conference on the disagreeing O'NEilL, JR., SAYS PHASE IV IS chines might accomplish this chore with- votes of the two Houses on the amend­ LIKE RADIATION TREATMENT out delay. ments of the House to the bill

Mr. STAGGERS. Would the gentle­ ployment and Fair Opportunity Aet; that language and make it crystal-clear man from ..Maryland repeat his qUestion? they are subject to that, of course, 3ust that we are not ~or publie broadeasts to Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland. Mr. as .all 1n tbe United States are subject be covered under the enforcement pro­ Chairman, I am saying that although tlle to i , a.J¥1 properly so, and I would fight Visions of title VII of the Civil Rights States have control over these programs, to see th&t that continues. Act. and over programing, we have Federal Mr~ CLAY~ Mr. Chairman, will the Mr. STAGGERS. Let me say to the dollars coming in. gentleman yield on tha.t point? gen.tleman that I am in entire sympathy Mr. STAGGERS. The states do not. r. STAGGERS. I yield to the gentle­ with the· objective that be is trying to The local station has the control, not the man from Missouri. ~ve. We will try to do this in -a way States. As I said before, there is less than Mr. CLAY. I am of the same opinion that I think is proper and right. I do not $1 in $10 that is paid by the Federal as the gentleman is that HEW and all believe that we ought to start amending Government for public broadcasting. other Federal agencies ztelating to pub­ this act. If we start doing it, we are going Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland. If I may lie broadcasts are covered by the law, to then d~ something that we did not say to the distinguished chairman. the but apparently HEW an.d the Federal intend. gentleman from W-est Virginia int, but is the ·gentleman sa-ying that Mr. STAGGERS. I yield to the gentle­ he would like to see this outfit free of man from Missouri. population is 80 to 85 percent black, we control -in terms of equal opportunity Mr. CLAY. I think that is all fine and have not a single black one sitting on entirely? good, but the point is there is still legal the board of directors of Public Broad­ Mr, MACDONALD. Of course not. disagreement even in the FCC as to casting. In my community also there is HEW, that supplies the facilities money, whether or not they have the authority not one black man sitting on the board - is sul>jeet, as any governmental agency and the power in order to require ascer­ of directors for Public Broadcasting. is, tp an the laws of the land, and among tainment surveys for public broadcasting. H~w do we have any input in. to deciding the ·laws of the land l.s the E

- July 20, 1973 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE 25173 grants to noncommercial educational · sources, but constantly resist the infiu­ 1967 specified, the Corporation for Public radio and television stations $25 million ence that is tied to overreliance on any Broadcasting was "to promote the avail­ for fiscal 197 4 and $30 million for fiscal one source of funding-be it a private ability . of high quality programs, year 1975. citizen, a tax-paying commercial enter- obtained from diverse sources." This bipartisan bill represents a fund- prise or a tax-exempt corporation. For _ If the Boards, the stations and espe­ ing level adequate for orderly growth of example, in the incipient stages of public cially the operating staJfs of public educational broadcasting, yet a modest broadcasting the Ford Foundation grants broadcasting do not make the new CPB­ enough figure that we have the best represented 25 percent of the total in­ PBS agreement workable, the new struc­ chance for avoiding a Presidential veto. come of the public broadcasting system. ture will fail. If it fails, a total restruc­ While we expect level of Federal sup-· Now Ford support represents only about turing of public broadcasting by Con­ port-now about 20 percent-to grad- 5 percent of such total income. And I feel gress would be the only available option. ually diminish in the future in favor of that reduction in single source influence We do not advocate homogeneous think­ local sources, Federal assistance ·is still is desirable. But, the Foundation has ing among components of public broad­ critical at this stage of development. recently been the source of over half the casting but participants must develop a H.R. 8538 sets authorizations for 2 annual income of selected licensees. H.R. greater spirit of cooperation among years, a time period which gives public 8538 carries no restrictions on maximum themselves. broadcasting the opportunity to plan percentages of support which licensees The organization of the Corporation realistically for its operation ·and the can receive from one source. However, for Public Broadcasting itself requires challenge to more fully attain the objec- such a provision may be necessary in·the continuing self-appraisal to insure that tives Congress intended for itS service future if the independence of individual its internal decisionmaking process re­ to the American people. licensees is threatened by undue depend- mains democratic, and that its creative This compromise bill should give the ence on underwriters or sponsors. planning does not fall victim to a grow­ .advocates and managers educational and In the legislation today, we recognize ing internal bureaucracy. H.R. 8538 does ' public broadcasting in Amertca 2 years that licensees can attain independence, not touch the issue of the Corporation to prove its worth to the public, the Con- program diversity and responsiveness to for Public Broadcasting Board member­ gress and the White House-or to de- local public interests only if they have ship or appointment procedures. In au­ stroy what confidence still remains after adequate facilities, strong financial sup­ thorizing operating funds for 2 years, we a stormy couple of years just past. port, necessary time to plan, access to hope the administration will use this In 1962, recognizing the significant alternative programing sources and a period to insure that the Corporation role television could play in meeting workable structure within which each for Public Broadcasting Board ap­ educational needs throughout the-United station can cooperate productively with pointees are of professional caliber. In States, Congress enacted the Edu- others and with the Corporation for Pub­ the long run selection criteria and proce­ cational Television Facilities Act. This lie Broadcasting. dures must be as far removed as possible provided matching grants to establish The recently agreed to reorganized from partisanship of any incumbent and expand noncommercial educational structure of public broadcasting offers administration. Insulating the Corpora­ television stations. Five years later, re- hope that the Corporation for Public tion for Public Broadcasting from polit­ sponding to the promise of success of this Broadcasting and the Public Broadcast­ ical pressures from whatever source is program, and to the recommendations of ing System can now function more effec­ indispensable to its success. As the last the Carnegie Commission Report on the tively. We expect the new 7 point agree­ 2 years have established, the system will potential of noncommercial television, ment between CPB and PBS upon which have its best chance of survival it c~ri Congress enacted the Public .Broadcast- · the structure is based to be more than avoid the charge that it is being used by ing Act of 1967 to establish the Corpora- a 'marriage of · necessity. The resolution anyone to advance partisan political tion for Public Broadcasting and ex- became a reality largely due to the par­ objectives. · panded the grant program to include ticipation of a few men of high stature. Also essential ·to effective- operation educational radio facilities. I was disap- We caution all involved to well utilize in the future is that the system· have pointed that the 1967 tended to blur the the conciliatory leadership of local li­ sufficient time to plan productions. The focus on education and tended to in- censees, PBS, CPB, the Congress and the minimum leadtime necessary to research, crease emphasis on establishing a sys- administration to assure that the system plan and produce program concepts is, tern competitive to commercial broad- endures beyond personalities currently in most cases, 18 months to 2 years. Less casting. involved. than minimum leadtime usually results But the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act, Especially commendable in the res- in a drop in prog~·am quality. And, low­ like the 1934 Communications Act, is olution is the provision which increases er program quality most often means a solidly based on the principles of local- unrestricted CPB grants for local sta­ drop in local financial support. For ex­ ism, diversity a:ad service to the public tions. Increasing the pass-through ample, planning for classroom prog~·ams interest in each licensee's service area. gt·ants is wholly consistent with a prin- is linked to a school planning cycle, However, as the Corporation has since cipal objective of the Corporation for usually 24 months. Consequently, the grown, proper emphasis to these prin- Public Broadcasting: to facilitate indi­ ability of a local station to contdbute ciples.has diminished. The original Car- vidual stations' capabilities to program to classroom instruction will be gt·eat­ negie Report recommended that: · for community needs rather than to ly enhanced by secure funding levels of The Corporation would exist primarily to some national standard. more than 1 year. A 2-year authorization make it possible for those stations, one by It is important, too, to emphasize the term, moreover, is a minimum time for one to provide the greatest public service to provision in point ( 4) ·of the agreement: hiring and training technical and crea- their communities. The final (PBS) schedule shall reflect the tive personnel. . There are 237 educatiomil television . arrangements of programs for interconnec­ r Another key element in strengthenil;g stations in areas serving 77 percent of the tion service to stations, and shall not be local statiom; is providing them with population, as well as 600 noncommercial trega.rded a.s a. schedule of programs for added flexibility in scheduling for their radio stations now in operation. Each of broadcast by the stations. locale. The facilities grant program au- ' these stations, at the local level, should True, the Corporation for Public thorized in H.R. 8538 and help give sta..: be the focal point for strengthening the Broadcasting exists in part to serve local tions this flexibility. For a station to. United States educational or public stations. But this service cannot be by receive programs from outside sow·ces broadcasting system. networking, but by stimulating the de- such as the Public Broadcasting System Incumbent on each station is the re- velopment of high quality, heterogene­ interconnection, then air them when and sponsibility to identify salient education- ous progt·aming alternatives. And, in if it chooses, the station must have suf­ al needs of its local community and pro- the past, the Corporation for Public ficient video tape recording equipment, gram. accordingly. as its resources allow. Broadcasting has too often concentrated which usually means a minimum of four Each licensee should seek the g~·eatest its 1·esources in too few ·production cen­ VTR units per station for scheduling nunl.ber of alternative programing ters. As the Public Broadcasting Act of flexibility. 25174 CONGRESSiONAi..lU:CORD-··. HOUSE· July 20~ 1973 .To give eacli existing station this ca­ poratioil. shOUld not come·as a surprise to· · The money to slii>i>ort noncommercial pacity woUld CQst $25 mil,lion. But -this anyone. · stations eomes from several sources. un·­ facilities' need is not the only one. Wheri Certain objectives were vecy clea.r· to de:r · present agreements with PBC larger· all matching grants funds appropriated the ·eongress when the PUblic Broad­ and larger percentages will come directly for fiscal year 1973 were spent, 75 appli­ casting Act was passed. Perhaps due ·to from approJ.)iiated Federal ftinds. Much cations seeking $20 million for local fa­ the limitations of langUage, they were of it comes from· school gystems, state cilities had not been acted upon, and no\ entirely understood. Perhaps they ahd local tax dollars and public contri­ 30 more applications will be filed this were concepts which cotild not be carried butions. The reason -rot funneling more year. Consequently, the $25 million and out in the realities of operation. In any Federal funds to iocal stations is to make $30 million authorized for fiscal year event, some ·of the things which Congress it; I>i>ss~ble · for them to concentrate on 1974 and fisca1 year 1975 meets only did-not wanli to happen in the implemen­ creating better local and regional pro.:.' minimum foreseeable needs for upgrad­ tation of the act did happen. Congress grams for use by noncommercial sta~ ing local stations -and giving each great­ did not want a concentration of program­ tions; If they have enough equipment er scheduling autonomy. ing sources such as the commercial tele­ :;md talent available to do that job anct With improved fa.cilities, added pro­ vision· companies maintain in New York stiil eoinpete in the marketplace, they gram funds, more planning time, a bet­ and the west coast. have ·entirely too much. And there is 'no ter system strUcture strong~r local li­ Neither did it want any one or a few excuse for any Federal funds being us·ed censees, and soine · partisan restra1nt, big mohey entities to dominate the pro­ to support· such stations. · · public broadcasting can break new ducing and offering of program material Such commercial activity is in direct' ground in continuing education, class­ for use by noncommercial stations. Per­ violation· of the Communications Act be-_ room instruction and teaching innova­ haps this was too much to expect, and so. sides being a misuse of Federal and othet tion. In fiscal year 1972, 34 percent of far the influence of one or two sources of tax money. As far as I am concerned all on-the-air hours in public television funds has pretty well dictated what any noncommercial stati-on which· is was instructional progratiling, and the woUld be available. · competing for production of commercial absolute number of hours totaled 241 ,000, Congress did not want another net­ mate1ial should be not only cutoff from an increase {)f 20,000 over 1971 and work, so it forbade the corporation au­ Federal funds but should be requ~red t