DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Spaulding, %22Georgia and the Election of Jimmy Carter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Spaulding, %22Georgia and the Election of Jimmy Carter Georgia Historical Society Georgia and the Election of Jimmy Carter Author(s): Phinizy Spalding Reviewed work(s): Source: The Georgia Historical Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 1 (Spring, 1977), pp. 13-22 Published by: Georgia Historical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40580339 . Accessed: 05/07/2012 11:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Georgia Historical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Georgia Historical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org Georgiaand the Electionof JimmyCarter By Phinizy Spalding November 1976 the Americanpeople, by votingin Jimmy Carter of Georgia as their new president,shattered the long held belief that no one from the South-least of all from Georgia-could be elected to the highestoffice in the United States. Whether it be the triumphof New South principles,a victoryover the partyof Watergate,or a formof psychological reparationdone by the othersections of the nation to the South as a kind of late paymentfor injuriesdone in the past,one thing is certain from the vantage point of Georgia: the state took, has taken, and is still taking enormouspride in the victory of the man fromPlains. Articlesabout Georgia, Georgians,Georgia politics,Georgia social mores,Georgia customs,Georgia speech, Georgia cooking, the Georgia man, the Georgia mind, and a dozen otherstate-related topics seem to be read with some avidity not only by the Eastern Establishment(many of whom are fromthe South to begin with) but also by the rest of a mobile nationin search of what makes Georgia tick. Whither,in short, Georgia's roots? While many Georgians can look upon all of this with a degree of bemusedobjectivity, even the most jaded will admit, when pressed,that it's nice to have a home grown boy in the White House. Georgia's pride manifesteditself in ground swell proportionsa bit over a year ago when Carter-aided by a phalanx of Georgia volunteerswho invaded New Hampshire- won that primaryand became a "major" candidate for the Democraticnomination. Pride swelledto feverpitch in the Florida and Georgia primaries,and manifesteditself once again at the November general election.Few political eventssince secession ♦Associate Professor of History, University of Georgia. 14 Georgia Historical Quarterly itselfhave so excitedGeorgians. One of the hearteningthings about the Carterphenomenon is thatblack Georgianswere as excitedby it as the whites,for Carterhad come to symbolizea new awakeningand a new chancefor the black man too. An AtlantaConstitution editorial, writtenin the warmglow of 3 November,may have put its fingeron the significanceof the black supportCarter received nationallyas well as locally."Jimmy Carter is thePresident-elect of the UnitedStates now, the firstGeorgian in the historyof thenation to win thattitle. He is a manof theNew Southand a man of the nation,a whiteSoutherner whose earliestmost sturdysupport came fromblack Americansin criticalprimary states."1His backingwas indeednational in scope, but some of Carter'smost effective supporters in Georgia-particularly in theearly going- came from such able blackpoliticians as Andrew Young, MaynardJackson, and Ben Brown. When the votes were cast on electionday the Atlantablack precinctsproved thedepth of theirloyalty by rollingup almostunbelievable ma- joritiesfor theirfellow Georgian.Morehouse Gym precinct showed832 votesfor Carter, 16 forFord; Morris Brown reported 620 forCarter, 16 forFord; PryorStreet School 133 forCarter, Ford 3. Princinct3B (Free For All) came in with 557 Carter votesto one singlelonely Ford ballot.At the sametime, Young ran at almostexactly the same percentageas Carterin these fourprecincts.2 In the rest of Georgia,it would appear that almostevery segmentof societyvoted for the state's ex-governor. Only with the countryclub set did Carterfare poorly, but thiscame as no particularsurprise to him or to his strategists.Democratic candidateson the nationalticket have not done well withthe countryclubbers since FDR's firstterm. Every one of the nine- teenprecincts in and aroundSandy Springs, for example,went to PresidentFord, some by a 2-1 ratioor better.3The sameis truefor similarupper urban and Suburbaneconomic precincts elsewherein the state.The less affluentwhites in Atlantaand Georgia and Carter's Election 15 other Georgia cities,though, apparently supported Carter, who also showed considerablestrength with blue-collarand farming elements.The white academic sector backed the Georgian-the Emory precinct by almost 2-1- and all Athens city precincts supportedhim. Carter'svote was especiallystrong in the Cedar Creek subdivision,where there is a significantgrouping of the Universityof Georgia's academic middle class.4 On the belief that most people missed seeing the complete Georgia returnsfrom last fall's presidentialelection, the Quar- terlyoffers the figuresfrom all of the state's 159 counties.The certifiedreturns printed below are stored in Secretaryof State Ben Fortson's office,and the editor would like to thank Mr. Fortson and his staff for the cheerful cooperation offered. Severalfeatures of the Cartervote in Georgia mightbe pointed out. Even the "traditionalRepublican counties" in the mountains along the North Carolina and Tennessee borderswent strongly forCarter. Union, Fannin, and Towns cast 7,983 votesfor Gover- nor Carter and 4,975 for Gerald Ford- roughly 60% of the vote for Carter. (Admittedlyconsiderably below the average for the rest of the state, but strong North Georgia support nonetheless.) In the congressionalrace in the same counties, Democrat Ed Jenkinspulled almost as many votes as Carter, but his Republican opponent drew just over half an many as Ford.5 Also in North Georgia, Gilmer county went almost 2-1 for Carter,White went over 3-1, and Rabun and Murray coun- ties about 4- 1. In the last four counties Carter's share of the vote rose to an impressive75%, therebyincreasing his full share of themountain vote in the sevencounties to 68%. These counties are relativelysparsely populated and have an overwhelmingpre- ponderanceof whites in their makeup. Carter,then, ran about as stronglyas any Democrat has in these selected mountain countiesin recentyears, pulling a total of 18,516to Ford's 8,341. The returnsfrom an eight county area of NorthwestGeorgia show resultsthat are somewhatdifferent, but not dramaticallyso. Walker and Catoosa, fast becomingbedroom countiesfor Chat- tanooga,evinced the strongestsupport for Ford, who also demon- 16 Georgia Historical Quarterly stratedsome strength in Floyd (Rome) and Whitfield(Dalton). Even so, thesefour countiesgave Carter65% of theirvote. On the otherhand, the more rural,lightly populated, almost whollywhite counties of Dade, Chattooga,Gordon, and Murray, presentedCarter with 76% of theirvote. The ten countieschosen for NortheastGeorgia show an in- terestingpattern.6. Elbert county,with a roughly32% non- whitepopulation, voted almost 5-1 forCarter; Jackson, with less than13% non-white, supported the Georgiacandidate by a 4-1 margin.Greene county, with over 50% of its populationnon- white,also optedfor a virtually4-1 ratio.Madison, Barrow, and Waltonwent 3-1 or betterfor Carter. Only Clarkeand Oconee, wheremany who workin Athenslive, failed to supportCarter by less than 2-1. Clarke,Athens, and the Universityare well knownfor political lemming instincts that go back to the days of Abit Nix and BlantonFortson. Athens and the University were later hotbedsof supportfor Carl Sanders(defeated by Carterin the 1970 gubernatorialprimary). After Sanders' loss, Clarkecarried its politicaldeath wish to new heightsby being the only countyin the stateto vote for RepublicanHal Suit in his generalelection race againstCarter for the governorship. ExcludingClarke and Oconee,Carter received a whopping77% fromNortheast Georgia. The Georgiapeanut farmer, in fact, did verywell indeedin the sevencounties in the statewhere the fewestnumber of totalvotes were cast. His majoritywas 73%, and in tinyEchols (Statenville)he receiveda landslide 84%. The sayingthat a prophetis last recognizedin his own land is not quiteborne out by the figurefor Sumter county (72%), but it is a fact thatthe eightcounties touching Sumter gave the Georgiana higherper cent (73%) of theirvote thandid Carter'shome county. Marion (Buena Vista) opted for Carter at roughly5-1; Dooly and Macon at betterthan 4-1. The latter twocounties have more non- whites in theirpopulation but Carter's supportwas drawnfrom all elements.Other rural counties with similarracial makeups showed roughly similar reactions. Hancock Georgia and Carter's Election 17 county,with almost74% of its populationnon-white, backed Carterbetter than 3-1; Taliaferrocounty about the same.The polarizationthat existed in manyAtlanta precincts was not so easy to detectin the rural countieswhere the white farmer apparentlyfound Carter, the hometown boy and man of the soil, easierto equate with thanFord and his midwesternisms, his religion,and his golf matchesor skiingjaunts to Vail. On the otherhand Sandy Springers,many of themwith as many Georgia"ties" as Philadelphiascrapple,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The George-Anne Student Media
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern The George-Anne Student Media 10-27-1970 The George-Anne Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Georgia Southern University, "The George-Anne" (1970). The George-Anne. 638. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne/638 This newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Media at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in The George-Anne by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. G-A Endorses Suit — Page 4 Inside This Week Activities Feature 2 Football Contest 16 Art Tour 3 Harlem Globetrotters ... .14 Murray Banks 2 Letters to the Editor 5 George-Anne Charlie Brown 2 Organizations 10 - 12 VOLUME 51 GEORGIA SOUTHERN COLLEGE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1970 STATESBORO, GEORGIA 30458 NUMBER 6 Columns 4&S Pulse of the People 6 .— —-— . , Editorial 4 Sports 14 & 15 Mock Election 8 & 9 Women's Lib 2 Campus-Wide Voting Choice '70 Set Tomorrow Mock Governors Election "Choice '70," a campus-wide recent poll on problems and mock Gubernatorial election, is Complete Details of "Choice priorities) "because of more • scheduled for tomorrow, October precincts. I hope the voter 28. '70" on pages eight and nine. turnout will reach 30 per cent," Students may vote in the said Meadows. lobbies of the Landrum or Skinner, however, was not so Williams Student Centers from 10 Young Democrats, Young optimistic. "Given the past record a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter - Record As Governor (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 33, folder “Carter - Record as Governor (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 33 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library .- 9/14/76 TO: RON NESSEN FROM: FRED SLIGHT For your information Cloudy Plesase Call Us Considerable cloudiness With a story or picture idea today with a chance or 374-7215 showers. High, 82; low, 11 a.m. to midnight GO. (1\lap and details, Page 2A.) To subscribe• or for Saturday's Temperntvr& home delivery assistance 6 a.m. 65 12 noon 75 6 p.m. 7$ Forenwst Newspaper Of The Carolinas 8 a.m. 65 2 P.m. 79 8 p.m. 75 S74-7S22 10 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • From James A
    Revision, Fall 2004 (20 November 2004) Prepared for James A. Thurber, ed. Rivals for Power, 3rd ed., (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005). Partisan Polarization, Politics, and the Presidency: Structural Sources of Conflict James P. Pfiffner George Mason University In his campaign for the presidency in the 2000 election, George W. Bush promised that he would work closely with Congress and the Democrats and tone down the corrosive partisan rhetoric that had come to characterize Washington in the last years of the 20th century. After a very close election in which Bush narrowly won the presidency while trailing the Democratic candidate by half a million votes, many expected him to take a conciliatory approach to Democrats in Congress and seek out moderates of both parties to forge an agenda in the middle of the political spectrum. But that is not what happened. Arguing that political capital had to be spent rather than conserved, Bush put forward a conservative policy agenda and won some impressive victories.i Just when his momentum began to lag in late summer of 2001, terrorists struck New York and Washington. The atrocities of 9-11 transformed the political landscape and presented Bush with a country unified under his leadership and broad international support for the United States. Yet three years later as he ran for reelection, the nation was deeply divided over his presidency and the war in Iraq. Although much of the political division between the parties in Congress and among partisans in the electorate could be attributed to disagreement over President Bush’s policies, the roots of the divisive partisan politics of the Bush Presidency lay in political developments in the preceding four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee, the Solid South, and the 1952 Presidential Election
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-9-2020 Y'all Like Ike: Tennessee, the Solid South, and the 1952 Presidential Election Cameron N. Regnery University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the American Politics Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Regnery, Cameron N., "Y'all Like Ike: Tennessee, the Solid South, and the 1952 Presidential Election" (2020). Honors Theses. 1338. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1338 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Y’ALL LIKE IKE: TENNESSEE, THE SOLID SOUTH, AND THE 1952 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION by Cameron N. Regnery A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford April 2020 Approved by: __________________________________ Advisor: Dr. Darren Grem __________________________________ Reader: Dr. Rebecca Marchiel __________________________________ Reader: Dr. Conor Dowling © 2020 Cameron N. Regnery ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my parents for supporting me both in writing this thesis and throughout my time at Ole Miss. I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Darren Grem, for helping me with both the research and writing of this thesis. It would certainly not have been possible without him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Rights Realignment: How Race Dominates Presidential Elections
    Political Analysis Volume 17 Volume XVII (2015) Article 1 2015 The iC vil Rights Realignment: How Race Dominates Presidential Elections ` Timothy J. Hoffman Seton Hall University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/pa Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Hoffman, Timothy J. (2015) "The ivC il Rights Realignment: How Race Dominates Presidential Elections `," Political Analysis: Vol. 17 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/pa/vol17/iss1/1 The Civil Rights Realignment: How Race Dominates Presidential Elections Timothy J. Hoffman The evolution of the black vote in presidential elections is one of the most significant changes to the American electorate over the last century. During this period, the black vote shifted to become one of the most solid pillars of the Democratic coalition, culminating with the historic election of Barack Obama as the first African American president in 2008. The race gap is arguably the most influential gap in explaining the political behavior of Americans and affects other behavioral gaps in American politics. This paper will take an historical perspective of presidential elections and political party dynamics since the Civil War and investigate how black voters defected from the Republican Party due to the actions of Democratic presidents who sought to enfranchise African Americans to build a stronger electoral coalition. We will analyze how the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932 began the evolution of the black vote, as the New Deal promised new opportunities for minorities and signaled a shift towards a more involved government that served the needs of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • The George-Anne Student Media
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern The George-Anne Student Media 11-3-1970 The George-Anne Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Georgia Southern University, "The George-Anne" (1970). The George-Anne. 639. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne/639 This newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Media at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in The George-Anne by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ■I ^ CarterOr Suit-WhichOne? „-£2555v I Qfeorjge-Arme VOLUME 51 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1970 STATESBORO, GEORGIA 30458 NUMBER 7 Inside This Week Elections Close Colleges What to Do 2 Photo Feature 7 Masquers 3 Poll Results 8 As Students Take To Polls Editorials 4 Organizations . .9, 10, 11 Columns 4 & 5 Southern Woman 13 colleges to dismiss classes on an Forum Page 5 Sports 14, 15 By GEOFFREY S. BENNETT governor's chair in the general election day. This is supposed to Letters 5 Intramurals 15 G-A Staff Writer election today as classes in all of give students an opportunity to Pulse of the People 6 Football Contest 16 NEWS ANALYSIS Georgia's collegesare called off. Democrat Jimmy Carter and An obscure state law was vote in the election today. Republican Hal Suit vie for the discovered which requires all In the less publicized yet equally important lieutenant governor's race, current Governor Lester Maddox is seeking the Suit Wins state's number two position.
    [Show full text]
  • CARTER HAS SOLID LEAD OVER FORD, REAGAN for Release: June 24, 1976 by Louis Harris B with His First Ballot Nomination Now Virtually Assured, Former Georgia Gov
    The Harris Survey CARTER HAS SOLID LEAD OVER FORD, REAGAN For Release: June 24, 1976 By Louis Harris b With his first ballot nomination now virtually assured, former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter has aoved out to a sweeping 53-40% lead over President Ford and a much wider 58-352 margin over former Calif. Gov. Ronald Re.~;;cn, according to the latest Harris Survey, held in mid-June. The base of Carter's strength is his apparent ability to carry his hone area of the South. He leads Gerald Ford in the border states by 68-29% and in the deep South by 57-38%. He is ahead of Ronnld Reagan in tkc region by almost the same margin: 68-28% in the border states and 55-372 in the deep South. He is the first Democrat in 12 years to demonstrate a capacity to win a solid South. The reason for Carter's current wide lead in this latest poll of 1,480 registered and likely voters is that traditional Democratic groups have rallied behind his candidacy now that the primary season is over. --Among labor union members, Carter leads the President by 61-33% and Reagan by 64-30%. --Among blacks, he holds a 71-17% edge over Mr. Ford and a 75-119: spread over the former California governor. --Among people who view themselves as liberals, Carter is ahead against President Ford by 67-27% and against Ronald Reagan by 76-182. -Among Catholics, he runs well ahead of the President by 53-409: and he beats Reagan by a more sizable 58-36%.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Family Papers: a Guide to Its Records at the Jimmy Carter Library
    441 Freedom Parkway NE Atlanta, GA 30307 http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov Carter Family Papers: A Guide to Its Records at the Jimmy Carter Library Collection Summary Creator: Carter, Jimmy, 1924- Title: Carter Family Papers Dates: 1940-1976 Quantity: 87 linear feet (70 linear feet, 3 linear inches open for research), 161 containers Identification: Accession Number: 80-1 National Archives Identifier: 592907 Scope and Content: The records in this collection document Jimmy Carter’s early political career in the Georgia State Senate, his term as Governor from1970-1974; and his membership on the West Georgia Planning Commission. In addition, the collection contains material from the 1970 gubernatorial campaign, gubernatorial trips to South America and Europe, the 1976 presidential campaign, Rosalynn Carter’s gubernatorial papers, and Carter’s pre- presidential speech files. The files consist of correspondence, form letters, memoranda, studies, recommendations, position papers, notes, speeches, drafts, press releases, news clippings, itineraries, newsletters, pamphlets, polling data, photographs, schedules, vote statistics, advertisement flyers, appointment books, and publications. Creator Information: Carter, Jimmy and Rosalynn The Carter Family Papers were transferred to the library by President and Mrs. Carter. These documents and memorabilia were collected over a twenty-five year period. Biographical information on key office personnel is located at the end of the finding aid. Restrictions: Restrictions on Access: These papers contain documents restricted in accordance with applicable executive order(s), which governs National Security policies, applicable statutes/agency restrictions, and material which has been closed in accordance with the donor’s deed of gift. Terms Governing Use and Reproduction: Copyright interest in these papers has been donated to the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Day 2 – Virginia Political History
    9/28/2017 Day 2 – Virginia Political History 1 9/28/2017 2 9/28/2017 The “Solid South” (Presidential Elections) Virginia voted for Republican Candidate in 1872, 1928, 1952, and 1956 3 9/28/2017 Partisan Breakdown in Virginia – Presidential Elections (1960-2016) 1960-1968 1972 1976 1980-2004 2008-2016 Current Virginia At the beginning of 2017, Virginia was one of 19 states under divided government Statewide offices (Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, United States Senators) controlled by Democrats. House of Delegates and State Senate Controlled by Republicans (House 66-34, Senate 21-19) House of Representatives – 7 Republicans, 4 Democrats 4 9/28/2017 Recent Virginia Election History Presidential elections 1992-2016, Republican candidates won four times, Democratic candidates won three times. In 2016, Virginia was a closely watched battleground state Democrat Hillary Clinton defeated Republican Donald Trump 49.7% to 44.0% 2016 Presidential Election Clinton defeated Trump in 51 out of 100 House of Delegates districts Trump defeated Clinton in six of 11 Congressional districts Five counties in Virginia—Buckingham, Caroline, Essex, Nelson, and Westmoreland—voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 but voted for Trump in 2016. 5 9/28/2017 Virginian Election History From 1977 through 2009, the Virginia Gubernatorial Election went against the Presidential Election from the previous year: 1977 – Republican wins after Carter (D) wins in 1976 1981 – Democrat wins after Reagan (R) wins in 1980 1985 – Democrat wins after Reagan (R) wins
    [Show full text]
  • Epilogue: Ugly Roots
    Epilogue 269 Epilogue: Ugly Roots hatred and fear of everything Republican, black, federal, and liberal-a burning memory that, it is not too much to write, was consuming and Race, Emotion, and the Rise of the Modern all-pervading in politics and society. For the next seven decades, the "Solid South" was almost completely and exclusively Democratic in its Republican Party in Alabama and the South politics and in its political and associated moral culture. Anything even remotely connected with the Republican Party was anathema in the Feldman Glenn South, indelibly associated with the traumatic, caricatured, and largely inaccurate collective memory of corrupt and incompetent "black rule," backed by the bristling bayonets of an invading army of northern, fed- eral aggression.' From Redemption onward, Republican candidates, in- cluding national presidential candidates, received only a handful of votes in the southern states. That is, until, the election of r9zB. From 1865 to r9z8 this was the Democratic Party, the "Solid Demo- cratic South," sometimes referred to by its proper name in places like Alabama: the "Conservative and Democratic Party." During these years there were several sporadic, and not inconsequential, challenges to the Solid South-Republicans, independents of various stripes, and fi- FOR ALMOST A century after the Civil War, the Republican Party ex- nally the Populists of the r89os.' But in the latter part of that decade, isted only on the periphery of southern society and its polity. The vast southern whites of all kinds-Bourbon Democrats and Independents- majority of white southerners viewed Republicans with the most intense agreed on the overriding goal of white supremacy, Jim Crow, and a dislike and suspicion-a revulsion so deep and so abiding that it is im- whites-only politics.a In Alabama, whites of various political persuasions possible to state it too strongly.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with John Savage May 1, 1987
    Georgia Government Documentation Project Series B: Public Figures Interview with John Savage May 1, 1987 Copyright Special Collections and Archives, Georgia State University Library DISCLAIMER: Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well- informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account. It reflects personal opinion offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. RIGHTS: Unless otherwise noted, all property and copyrights, including the right to publish or quote, are held by Georgia State University (a unit of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia). This transcript is being provided solely for the purpose of teaching or research. Any other use--including commercial reuse, mounting on other systems, or other forms of redistribution--requires permission of the appropriate office at Georgia State University. In addition, no part of the transcript may be quoted for publication without written permission. To quote in print, or otherwise reproduce in whole or in part in any publication, including on the Worldwide Web, any material from this collection, the researcher must obtain permission from (1) the owner of the physical property and (2) the holder of the copyright. Persons wishing to quote from this collection should consult the reference archivist to determine copyright holders for information in this collection.
    [Show full text]