DOCSLIB.ORG

JOIDES Executive Committee 30-31 January, 2002 University of California at Santa Cruz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOIDES Executive Committee 30-31 January, 2002 University of California at Santa Cruz JOIDES Executive Committee 30-31 January, 2002 University of California at Santa Cruz Prepared by the JOIDES Office at http://joides.rsmas.miami.edu RSMAS-MGG, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami FL 33149, USA FINAL VERSION JOIDES EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA at SANTA CRUZ 30-31 JANUARY, 2002 MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY 30 JANUARY 9:00AM 1. Welcome and Introduction p.4-5 1.1 Introduction of participants p.4 (Harrison) 1.2 Meeting logistics p.5 (Silver) 2. Approval of Agenda p.2 (Harrison) 3. Minutes and Matters Arising p.6 3.1 Approve Jun. 2001 EXCOM Minutes p.6 (Harrison/Urquhart) 3.1.1 EXCOM Motion 01-2-7 p.6 (Harrison) 4. Country and Consortium Reports (Read Only) p.7-24 4.1 ECOD p.7 (Von Knorring) 4.2 France (Cannat) 4.3 Germany p.9 (Beiersdorf) 4.4 Japan p.10 (Tokuyama) 4.3 PacRim Consortium 4.6 The Peoples Republic of China p.11 (Shen) 4.7 United Kingdom p.12 (Falvey) 4.8 U.S.A p.13 (Malfait) COFFEE BREAK 10:10 – 10:30 5. Management and Operations Reports p. 25-66 5.1 ODP Council Report p.25 (Malfait) 5.2 NSF Management Report p.25 (Malfait) 5.3 JOI (Bohlen) 5.4 PEC VI p.27 (Harrison) 5.5 ODP Operations p.32 (Fox) 5.6 LDEO Borehole Research Group p.57 (Goldberg) 5.7 JOIDES 5.7.1 JOIDES EXCOM Public Affairs Subcommittee p.64 (Orcutt/White) 5.7.2 Draft plan for phasing out JOIDES Science Advisory Structure (EXCOM Motion 00-2-3) p.65 (Becker) 5.7.3 JOIDES identity and JOIDES Journal post 2003 (Harrison/Becker) LUNCH BREAK 12:00 – 1:15 2 6. Relationships with Other Organizations 6.1 ICDP (Mutter et al.) 6.2 Industry (Beiersdorf) 7. IODP Planning p.67 7.1 IWG (Leinen/Harrison) 7.1.1 iSAS Staffing (Harrison) 7.2 IPC p.67 (Kinoshita) 7.3 MEXT Report (Miki) 7.4 JAMSTEC Report (Miki/Yamakawa) 7.5 OD21 Report (Kinoshita) 7.6 European initiative (Falvey) 7.7 U.S. NSF plans (Malfait) COFFEE 3:00 – 3:30 8. SCICOM Report p.68-78 8.1 Achievements on Legs 196-199 (Becker) 8.2 Proposal activity/transfer p.76 (Urquhart) 8.3 SCICOM Legacy Report p.78 (Becker) THURSDAY 31 JANUARY 9:00AM 9. FY 2003 Science Plan and Budget p.79 9.1 FY 2003 Science Plan p.79 (Becker) 9.2 FY 2003 Program Plan and Budget p.84 (Bohlen) 9.2.1 FY03 PP - Executive Summary ES-1 (Bohlen) 9.2.2 FY03 PP – Introduction PP-1 (Bohlen) 9.2.3 FY03 Program Plan PP-50 (Bohlen) 9.3 Phase out Plans – FY 04-07 PP-95 and page XIV 9.3.1 JOI PP-114 (Bohlen) 9.3.2 ODP PP-96 (Fox) 9.3.3 LDEO PP-107 (Goldberg) COFFEE BREAK 10:10 – 10:30 10. Legacy Plans 10.1 JOI (Bohlen) 10.2 JOIDES (Becker) 10.3 ODP (Fox) 10.4 LDEO (Goldberg) 11. Future Meetings and Other Business 12.1 Granada, Spain, June 2002 (Von Knorring) 12.2 Future meetings (Harrison) 12.3 IUGG (Harrison) 12.4 Other business 3 JOIDES EXCOM –UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA at SANTA CRUZ, 30-31 JANUARY 2002 PARTICIPANTS Executive Committee – EXCOM Chris Harrison (Chair) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, USA Helmut Beiersdorf Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften Und Rohstoffe, Germany Robert S. Detrick Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA David Falvey British Geological Survey, United Kingdom Dennis V. Kent Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, USA Mary von Knorring Swedish Research Council John Mutter Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO), Columbia University, USA Neil Opdyke Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, USA John Orcutt Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA Robert M. Owen Dept of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, USA Trevor Powell Australian Geological Survey Organization, Australia. David Prior College of Geosciences, Texas A&M University, USA Eli Silver Earth Sciences Department, University of California, USA Paul Stoffa Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas at Austin, USA Hidekazu Tokuyama Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Japan Associate Member Observers Mathilde Cannat Laboratoire de Géosciences Marines, Universite Pierre at Marie Curie, Paris, France Jianzhong Shen Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing, China Liaisons Keir Becker Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, USA Stephen Bohlen Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Jeff Fox Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), Texas A&M University, USA Dave Goldberg Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO), Columbia University, USA Bruce Malfait National Science Foundation (NSF), USA Guests John Farrell Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Eldon Hayman Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Taneika Herman Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Hajimu Kinoshita Japan Marine and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), Japan Carol Kokinda Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Yoshiro Miki Japan Marine and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), Japan Nick Pisias Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA Kiyoshi Suyehiro Japan Marine and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), Japan Toshiya Uenoyama Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan Kasey White Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), Inc., USA Yasuo Yamada Japan Marine and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), OD21, Japan Minoru Yamakawa Japan Marine and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), iSAS, Japan Guests from JOI BOG Raymond Bye Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA Timothy Cowles Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA David Farmer Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, USA Fred Grassle Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA Neil Lundberg Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA Franklin Orr Stanford University, California, USA Barry C. Raleigh SOEST, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA JOIDES Office Elspeth Urquhart International Liaison, RSMAS, University of Miami, USA Aleksandra Janik Science Coordinator, RSMAS, University of Miami, USA 4 1.2 Meeting logistics MEETING LOCATION, DATES & TIMES January 30 09:00 – 17:00 January 31 09:00 – 12:00 Santa Cruz Meeting Room (second floor of the hotel) West Coast Santa Cruz Hotel 175 West Cliff Drive Santa Cruz, CA 95060 PHONE: (831) 426-4330 FAX: (831) 427-2025 RES: (800) 325-4000 http://www.westcoasthotels.com/WHC/hotels/ShowHotel.asp?ID=48 LUNCHES Lunch each day in The Twelve Winds Room GROUND TRANSPORTATION From San Francisco International Airport (SFO) or Santa Cruz Airport (SJC), there is only one transportation company: The Santa Cruz Airporter. The fee each way from SFO is $45.00 and from SJC is $35.00. The pick up times at the airports are as follows: From SFO: 08:00 every two hours until 22:00 From SJC: 09:00 every two hours until 23:00 It is recommended that you reserve by calling 800.497.4997 (toll free in the U.S.), or 831.423.1214 worldwide. There are many car rentals available at both airports, and parking at the hotel is free. If you were to taxi from SFO it would be over $100.00, and from SJC it is ~$80.00. MEETING HOST Dr. Eli Silver Earth Sciences Department University of California 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (831) 459 2266 (831) 459 3074 [email protected] SOCIAL FUNCTIONS January 29 Icebreaker 18:00 - 19:30 at Seymour Discovery Center Hosted by Gary Griggs of The Institute of Marine Sciences and Thorne Lay of IGPP. Please be in the lobby of West Coast Santa Cruz Hotel at 17:45 for bus transportation to Seymour Discovery Center. Bus transportation will be provided back to the hotel at 19:30. If you would like to attend please RSVP to Eli Silver [email protected] and advise if you will bring a guest. January 30 Dinner at University House on the UCSC Campus, 19:00 - 21:00 Hosted by JOI and campus provost and executive vice-chancellor John B. Simpson. Please be in the lobby of West Coast Santa Cruz Hotel at 18:30 for bus transportation to University House. Bus transportation will be provided back to the hotel at 21:00. A formal invitation will be sent to you, please RSVP at that time. FIELD TRIP: February 1 Viewing of coastal views and outcrops, culminating at an excellent local winery. If you are interested contact Eli Silver [email protected] 5 3.1 Approve June 2001 EXCOM Minutes The minutes from the last EXCOM meeting in June 2001 in Oxford, UK are available at: http://joides.rsmas.miami.edu/files/EXCOM_01_2.pdf 3.1.1 EXCOM Motion 01-2-7 EXCOM Motion 01-2-7: EXCOM advises SCICOM that the ODP JOIDES Science Advisory Structure will terminate in Sept. 2003. EXCOM recognizes that JOI may continue to require scientific advice during the ODP phase-out period through FY2007, and recommends that JOI seek advice, as appropriate, during this period from the IODP SAS to ensure a smooth transition from ODP to IODP. Detrick moved, Falvey seconded; 15 in favor Excerpts from “A Guide to the Ocean Drilling Program” JOIDES Journal, 1999: http://joides.rsmas.miami.edu/files/guide2odp99.pdf : “The new JOIDES Science Advisory Structure is headed by a Science Committee (SCICOM), the mandate of which focuses on the long-term science planning activities necessary to meet, and go beyond, the goals of the ODP Long Range Plan. this capacity, SCICOM prioritizes scientific and technological objectives based on input and advice from the Advisory Structure panels in order to optimize the scientific returns from drilling. An Operations Committee (OPCOM), created as a sub-committee of SCICOM, deals with operational issues, such as ship scheduling, technological development, and scientific measurements. OPCOM’s responsibilities include providing SCICOM with drilling schedules based on SCICOM’s proposal rankings, advising SCICOM on short-term logistical and technological implementations of highly ranked scientific programs, as well as longer term technological requirements for implementing the ODP Long Range Plan.” 6 4.1 ECOD The European Consortium for Ocean Drilling Mary von Knorring ECOD Country Report (1 July – 31 December 2001) 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    annual report 2006-07 Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE Established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Programme Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE annual report 2006-07 table of contents executive summary 1 context and major developments during the year 1 national research priorities 3 national research priority goals 3 table 1: national research priorities and CRC research 3 governance & management 4 table 2: speciied personnel 5 research programs 8 climate variability & change 9 ocean control of carbon dioxide 12 antarctic marine ecosystems 15 sea-level rise 17 policy 20 table 3: research outputs and milestones 23 research collaboration 31 commercialisation & utilisation 36 commercialisation & utilisation strategies and activities 36 intellectual property management 37 table 4: commercialisation milestones 37 communication strategy 38 end-user involvement and CRC impact on end-users 39 education & training 42 table 6: education & training outputs and/or milestones 43 third year review 44 performance measures 45 table 7: progress on performance measures 45 glossary of terms 49 executive summary The Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative past climate captured in the Antarctic ice sheet. We Research Centre (ACE CRC) was funded to lead Australian have strengthened the previous evidence of signals research on the roles of Antarctica and the Southern in ice cores of winter sea ice cover around eastern Ocean in the global climate system and climate change. Antarctica, allowing hind-casting of sea ice dynamics We also have a brief to investigate likely impacts of that will enable us to properly interpret recent events climate change on Southern Ocean marine ecosystems possibly related to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacio-Lacustrine Aragonite Deposition, Meltwater Evolution And
    Antarctic Science 19 (3), 365–372 (2007) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2007 Printed in the UK DOI: 10.1017/S0954102007000466 Glacio-lacustrine aragonite deposition, meltwater evolution and glacial history during isotope stage 3 at Radok Lake, Amery Oasis, northern Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica IAN D. GOODWIN1 and JOHN HELLSTROM2 1Environmental and Climate Change Research Group, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia [email protected] Abstract: The late Quaternary glacial history of the Amery Oasis, and Prince Charles Mountains is of significant interest because about 10% of the total modern Antarctic ice outflow is discharged via the adjacent Lambert Glacier system. A glacial thrust moraine sequence deposited along the northern shoreline of Radok Lake between 20–10 ka BP, overlies a layer of thin, aragonite crusts which provide important constraints on the glacial history of the Amery Oasis. The modern Radok Lake is fed by the terminal meltwaters of the alpine Battye Glacier. The aragonite crusts were deposited in shallow water of ancestral Radok Lake 53 ka BP,during the A3 warm event in Isotope Stage 3. Oxygen isotope (d18O) analysis of the last glacial-age aragonite crusts 18 indicates that they precipitated from freshwater with a d OSMOW composition of -36%, which is 8% more depleted than the present water (-28%) in Radok Lake. A regional oxygen isotope (d18O) and elevation relationship for snow is used to determine the source of meltwater and glacial ice in Radok Lake during the A3 warm event.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoceanography
    PUBLICATIONS Paleoceanography RESEARCH ARTICLE Sea surface temperature control on the distribution 10.1002/2014PA002625 of far-traveled Southern Ocean ice-rafted Key Points: detritus during the Pliocene • New Pliocene East Antarctic IRD record and iceberg trajectory-melting model C. P. Cook1,2,3, D. J. Hill4,5, Tina van de Flierdt3, T. Williams6, S. R. Hemming6,7, A. M. Dolan4, • Increase in remotely sourced IRD 8 9 10 11 9 between ~3.27 and ~2.65 Ma due E. L. Pierce , C. Escutia , D. Harwood , G. Cortese , and J. J. Gonzales to cooling SSTs 1 2 • Evidence for ice sheet retreat in the Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London, London, UK, Now at Department of Geological Sciences, Aurora Basin during interglacials University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, 3Department of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK, 4School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 5British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK, 6Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York, USA, 7Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia Supporting Information: 8 • Readme University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York, USA, Department of Geosciences, Wellesley College, • Text S1 and Tables S1–S3 Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA, 9Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC-UGR, Armilla, Spain, 10Department of Geology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA, 11Department of Paleontology, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Correspondence to: C. P. Cook, c.cook@ufl.edu Abstract The flux and provenance of ice-rafted detritus (IRD) deposited in the Southern Ocean can reveal information about the past instability of Antarctica’s ice sheets during different climatic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Glacial Dynamics in Lambert Glacial Basin
    INVESTIGATION OF GLACIAL DYNAMICS IN LAMBERT GLACIAL BASIN USING SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES A Dissertation by JAEHYUNG YU Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2005 Major Subject: Geography INVESTIGATION OF GLACIAL DYNAMICS IN LAMBERT GLACIAL BASIN USING SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES A Dissertation by JAEHYUNG YU Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Hongxing Liu Committee Members, Andrew G. Klein Vatche P. Tchakerian Mahlon Kennicutt Head of Department, Douglas Sherman December 2005 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Investigation of Glacial Dynamics in Lambert Glacial Basin Using Satellite Remote Sensing Techniques. Jaehyung Yu, B.S., Chungnam National University; M.S., Chungnam National University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Hongxing Liu The Antarctic ice sheet mass budget is a very important factor for global sea level. An understanding of the glacial dynamics of the Antarctic ice sheet are essential for mass budget estimation. Utilizing a surface velocity field derived from Radarsat three-pass SAR interferometry, this study has investigated the strain rate, grounding line, balance velocity, and the mass balance of the entire Lambert Glacier – Amery Ice Shelf system, East Antarctica. The surface velocity increases abruptly from 350 m/year to 800 m/year at the main grounding line. It decreases as the main ice stream is floating, and increases to 1200 to 1500 m/year in the ice shelf front.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Change and Glaciological Map of The
    Prepared in cooperation with the Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Amery Ice Shelf Area, Antarctica: 1961–2004 By Kevin M. Foley, Jane G. Ferrigno, Charles Swithinbank, Richard S. Williams, Jr., and Audrey L. Orndorff Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series Map I–2600–Q 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Foley, K.M., Ferrigno, J.G., Swithinbank, Charles, Williams, R.S., Jr., and Orndorff, A.L., 2013, Coastal-change and glaciological map of the Amery Ice Shelf area, Antarctica: 1961–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map I–2600–Q, 1 map sheet, 8-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacio-Lacustrine Aragonite Deposition
    Antarctic Science 19 (3), 365–372 (2007) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2007 Printed in the UK DOI: 10.1017/S0954102007000466 Glacio-lacustrine aragonite deposition, meltwater evolution and glacial history during isotope stage 3 at Radok Lake, Amery Oasis, northern Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica IAN D. GOODWIN1 and JOHN HELLSTROM2 1Environmental and Climate Change Research Group, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia [email protected] Abstract: The late Quaternary glacial history of the Amery Oasis, and Prince Charles Mountains is of significant interest because about 10% of the total modern Antarctic ice outflow is discharged via the adjacent Lambert Glacier system. A glacial thrust moraine sequence deposited along the northern shoreline of Radok Lake between 20–10 ka BP, overlies a layer of thin, aragonite crusts which provide important constraints on the glacial history of the Amery Oasis. The modern Radok Lake is fed by the terminal meltwaters of the alpine Battye Glacier. The aragonite crusts were deposited in shallow water of ancestral Radok Lake 53 ka BP,during the A3 warm event in Isotope Stage 3. Oxygen isotope (d18O) analysis of the last glacial-age aragonite crusts 18 indicates that they precipitated from freshwater with a d OSMOW composition of -36%, which is 8% more depleted than the present water (-28%) in Radok Lake. A regional oxygen isotope (d18O) and elevation relationship for snow is used to determine the source of meltwater and glacial ice in Radok Lake during the A3 warm event.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossover Analysis of Lambert-Amery Ice Shelf Drainage Basin for Elevation Changes Using Icesat GLAS Data
    Crossover Analysis of Lambert-Amery Ice Shelf Drainage Basin for Elevation Changes Using ICESat GLAS Data Dr. SHEN Qiang, Prof. E. Dongchen and Mr. JIN Yinlong (China P. R. Key Words: remote sensing; Lambert-Amery System (LAS); ICESat; GLAS (The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System); elevation change; mass balance; crossover analysis SUMMARY In IPCC Report, the climate change issue has become important part of the larger challenge of sustainable development. The widespread retreat or dilation of glaciers is considered good response to the climate change, such as temperature rise, sea-level rise, etc.. As the largest glacier-ice shelf system in Antarctica, the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system plays an important role in contributions to ice drainage in East Antarctica, which may be make large contributions to rising sea level as well as climate environment. For the ICESat GLAS can determine ice-sheet elevation with an intrinsic precision of better than 10 cm and associated temporal change at the centimeter per year level. So it can be used to measure seasonal and interannual variability of ice-sheet topography in sufficient spatial and temporal detail. In general, Estimates of the global contribution of glaciers to sea level rise are traditionally based on labor-intensive mass-balance (snow/ice input minus ice/water output) measurements on the glacier surface. In this paper, crossover analysis method is addressed for detection of elevation change in Lambert-Amery system. It is differenced measurements at track intersection points that occur with the crossovers of ascending and descending orbit nodes. Common effects will cancel in the crossover formation but temporal effects will remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Numbers in Italic, Eg 221, Signify
    Index Page numbers in italic, e.g. 221, signify references to figures. Page numbers in bold, e.g. 60, denote references to tables. Adventure Subglacial Trench 220-221,221 structure 156 Alaska surface strain-rates 154-155, 154, 155, 156 Bering Glacier 60, 68, 75 tephra layer 149, 150, 151,152, 156 Black Rapids Glacier 172, 172, 173 thrust faults 153 Burroughs Glacier 60 Lambert Glacier 61, 72 Columbia Glacier 172, 173 Meserve Glacier 60, 181, 184, 184, 187, 189 Gulkana Glacier 60, 73 North Masson Range 116 Hubbard Glacier 75 South Masson Range 116 Kaskawulsh Glacier 60 South Shetland Islands 148 Malaspina Glacier 60, 68, 75 Suess Glacier, Taylor Valley 182, 187, 189 Phantom Lake 69 Taylor Glacier 11 Spencer Glacier 205 Taylor Valley 182 Twin Glacier 60 Transantarctic Mountain range 221 Variegated Glacier 61, 65, 67, 68, 76, 76, 86 Wordie Ice Shelf 61 deformation history 90, 92, 94 Ards Peninsula, Northern Ireland 307 shear zones 72, 75, 75 argillans, definition 256 strain 88, 89, 92, 94 Arrhenius relation 34 subglacial till deformation 172 Asgard Range, Antarctica 182 surging 86, 87 Astro Glacier, Canada 69 velocity 88, 89 Austerdalsbreen, Norway 60 Worthington Glacier 61, 65 Austre Broggerbreen, Svalbard 70 Amery Ice Shelf, Antarctica 61 Austre Lov+nbreen, Svalbard 70, 77 ammonium concentration, Greenland Ice Sheet Austre Okstindbreen, Norway 205 15, 16, 20 Austria anisotropy of ice Hintereisferner 60 annealing 101, 104, 106, 107, 111, 112 Langtaufererjochferner 60 c-axis orientation 100-104, 101, 103, 104, 105-107, Pasterze Glacier,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    WWW.ACECRC.ORG.AU ANTARCTIC CLIMATE & ECOSYSTEMS COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT: 2007–2008 Established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program ACE CRC leads Australia’s effort to understand the roles of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean in the global climate system and climate change. Our research focuses on projecting future changes in sea level; understanding ocean processing of greenhouse gases; and managing marine ecosystems, as well as analysing the policy implications of our science. ANNUAL REPORT: 2007–2008 table of contents Annual Report 2007–2008 Executive Summary 4 © Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre 2008 National Research Priorities 5 This work is copyright It may be reproduced Governance and Management 6 in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an Research Programs 10 acknowledgement of the source but not for commercial sale or usage. Reproduction Commercialisation and Utilisation 28 for purposes other than those listed above requires the written permission of the Education & Training 35 Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre Performance Measures 36 Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction rights should be addressed to: Glossary of Terms 38 Communications Manager Appendices Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre Private Bag 80 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Tel: +61 3 6226 7888 Fax: +61 3 6226 2440 Email: [email protected] www.acecrc.org.au Photo cover: Simon Marsland Photo inside front cover: Simon Marsland 3 ANNUAL REPORT: 2007–2008 executive summary Activities of the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Our Sea-Level Rise (SLR) Program delivered new and improved Research Centre (ACE CRC) during 2007–2008 have been estimates of ocean warming and sea-level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The patterns and drivers of recent outlet glacier change in East Antarctica MILES, ALBERT,WILLIAM,JOHN How to cite: MILES, ALBERT,WILLIAM,JOHN (2017) The patterns and drivers of recent outlet glacier change in East Antarctica, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12426/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Abstract West Antarctica and Greenland have made substantial contributions to global sea level rise over the past two decades. In contrast, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) has largely been in balance or slightly gaining mass over the past two decades. This is consistent with the long-standing view that the EAIS is relatively immune to global warming. However, several recent reports have highlighted instabilities in the EAIS in the past, and some numerical models now predict near-future sea level contributions from the ice sheet, albeit with large uncertainties surrounding the rates of mass loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Antarctic Magazine — Issue 19: 2010
    AusTRALIAN ANTARCTIC MAGAZINE ISSUE 19 2010 AusTRALIAN ANTARCTIC ISSUE 2010 MAGAZINE 19 The Australian Antarctic Division, a division of the Departmentof Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, leads Australia’s CONTENTS Antarctic program and seeks to advance Australia’s Antarctic interests in pursuit of its vision of having SCIENCE ‘Antarctica valued, protected and understood’. It does Aerial ‘OktoKopter’ to map Antarctic moss 1 this by managing Australian government activity in Whale poo fertilises oceans 4 Antarctica, providing transport and logistic support to Australia’s Antarctic research program, maintaining four Modelling interactions between Antarctica and the Southern Ocean 6 permanent Australian research stations, and conducting ICECAP returns to Casey 7 scientific research programs both on land and in the Southern Ocean. Seabed surveys for sewage solutions 8 Australia’s four Antarctic goals are: Dispersal and biodiversity of Antarctic marine species 10 • To maintain the Antarctic Treaty System and enhance Australia’s influence in it; MARINE MAmmAL RESEARCH • To protect the Antarctic environment; Surveying Pakistan’s whales and dolphins 12 • To understand the role of Antarctica in Fiji focuses on endangered humpback whales 13 the global climate system; and Capacity-building in Papua New Guinea 13 • To undertake scientific work of practical, Dolphin hotspot a conservation priority 14 economic and national significance. Unmanned aircraft count for conservation 15 Australian Antarctic Magazine seeks to inform the Australian and international Antarctic community AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC SCIENCE SEASON 2010-11 about the activities of the Australian Antarctic program. Opinions expressed in Australian Antarctic Magazine Science season overview 16 do not necessarily represent the position of the New 10-year science strategic plan 20 Australian Government.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Structure and Dynamics of the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf System: Implications for the Origin of Prydz Bay Sediments1
    Barron, J., Larsen, B., et al., 1991 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 119 5. STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF THE LAMBERT GLACIER-AMERY ICE SHELF SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN OF PRYDZ BAY SEDIMENTS1 Michael J. Hambrey2 ABSTRACT Depositional processes in Prydz Bay during the past 40 m.y. or so have been strongly influenced by glacier ice. Therefore, to understand these processes better, and to define the source areas of the sediment, it is necessary to deter- mine the role of the different ice masses entering the bay. Ice thickness, topography, and ice velocity data indicate that the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system is one of the most important routes for the discharge of ice from the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, and in the past has been the dominant influence on sedimentation in Prydz Bay. Most of the flow is concentrated through the Lambert Graben, which has been overdeepened to a depth of 2500 m below sea level. Glacio- logical work has indicated that close to the grounding line there is considerable melting, but from a short distance sea- ward of this position, basal freeze-on of ice of oceanic origin occurs. Thus nearly all the basal debris load in the Lam- bert Glacier system may be deposited close to the grounding line, and that there is probably negligible deposition be- neath the major part of the Amery Ice Shelf. Englacial debris, delivered to the open sea through the interior of the ice shelf, will be deposited from icebergs. There have been conflicting reports concerning the dynamics of the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system.
    [Show full text]