Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Hollins University

Hollins University

Instructor: Sharp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Sorins-Term 2019 Date , 2 CM

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check box beside the alternative which most closely appro imates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may farther represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor ) Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward j Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject 'rfVery much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much f increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking Very high Rj-Hgh oderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult gpiffichit Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the Very good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time spent on Very high High J Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Yourmaior? Crecv-k xsA-Kna ( Sociolog Your approximate cumulative grade-point average?

Your class level? F vg shmcun 207. z") Grade you expect to receive in this course? T / ft

to avvis C c ss TK-2_ rvrctVe Voa. ceexa XAiXYS Comments: cx'vDaot v O x spir g, fcH O'xA'3 C d , P o- or 5 acvrp <_j- c s YV€\ pG\_>V

C t cv Ss oovw Gcr a He osCa v f'Hg rYVCx. , C tcxss 'vJ yv

f "\- So |

Cv S o irvxXj - -v s Lx c . S V x l _ Instructor: Sharp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date %

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely appro imates your opinion. There is space at the hottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor E very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor j 2. My rating of the instructor s El Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward 0 Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor m Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative j 5. My interest in the subject 0 Very much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking I Very high High oderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education l /very high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Difficult El Average Easy Very easy j 9. Fairness and adequacy of the Ea Very good Good Satisfactory Poor O Very poor evaluation of my work j 10. Amount of time I spent on Very high H High Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course 0 Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major?? VI VVA Your approximate cumulative grade-point average?

Your class level? 2.0 IA Grade you expect to receive in this course?

Comments:

-c.j'JOY. A-t-'np G fti v -T t \vG\w,toi cv-i Ji-Cj M „ \ J l;.i ! v\ 10 l rr Oh A a/ T I J It I (I tG '-i r ,5 V c w f- r .< :l //r'C r AA. t it n l ) V- |l v e-4 h tt j iu wV c fOw V-eh

\ kC' t 1 v\ vuv \?v ¦' 1 '' fH \ c\o G it

I C t.aVavY tx i-tvif\ ()W ST' \ f u {' < t 0 V Instructor: S arp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date ' /t/tl

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely approximates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which ycuHnay further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor Vety bod Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s /ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive Positjye Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject Very much ikmcreased, Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major?Ti fl < £35 Your approximate cumulative grade-point average?

Your class level? Grade you expect to receive in this cou se? /

Comments: v

pa J- 0

avni- . u / J- Ke Instructor: Sharp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term2019 Date .' . w /...

Instructions: For each numbered uestion, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely approximates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor CT'j/ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s Dj /ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor's attitude toward A/ery positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students / 4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative / 5. My interest in the subject Very much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking I Very high High Moderate Low Very low

. / 7. Contribution to my education igWery high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course 1 Very difficult Difficult Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the SfVery good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work / 10. Amount of time I spent on 51 Very high High Moderate Low Very low this course - / 11. My overall rating of the course £l Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor A / \ Your maior? J Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? 0 Aj >*3 Your class level? A A .VA4 a Grade vou expect to receive in this course?

Comments:

T

" ' a. .. /v

cx

a nay# . y. fcy i Instructor: Sharp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Sming-Term2019 Date 2 {°\

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely appro imates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor O Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s B ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward SJ ery positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor Q /ery positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject 0 /ery much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking i£lVery high High Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education S ery high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Qd ifficult Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the £3 /ery good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Very high B igh Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course B Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major? 6N6 SU £ UfcATKfr Your approximate cumulative grade-point average?

Your- class level? lO l L ( E UtCl .AI Grade you expect to receive in this course?

Comments:

i tryri h

/ i6 sC tr +. M /

JL hArr el . HOLLINS Instructor: Sharp, Meighan UNIVERSITY ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date _

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the bo beside the alternative which most closely appro imates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward fVery positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject WVery much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much 1 increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking Very high 6 High Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education Very high High .Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Difficult Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the LVery good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Very high High oQ.CDs21CD* Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major? Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? _

Your class level?_ T01G Grade you expect to receive in this course? A

Comments:

u) I l< Instructor: Sharp, Meighan HOLLINS ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing UNIVERSITY # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely approximates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor ( very good Good Adequate Poor Very oor

2. My rating of the instructor s EfVery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward 'izfvery positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive 'E positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject fvery much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking Very high EfHigh Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education tz Very high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Difficult ifefAverage Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the Very good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Very high High ffifk/loderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course la Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major? our approximate cumulative rade-point average?

Your class level? Grade you expect to receive in this course?

Comments:

x V.,* »,J iw> HOLLINS Instructor: Sharp, Mei han UNIVERSITY ENG 142 (3): Intermediate Creative Writing # of Students: 10

Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS)

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date

Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely appro imates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor S Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s S Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor (Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject J Very much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking Very high High Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education Very high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Difficult Average Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the )s(yery good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Very high H'gh Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course y Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your maior? {_ ?d T J \A f " \ A Your approximate cumulative grade-point average?

/ ? 0* ) 0 Your class level? Yt/ - Grade you expect to receive in this course?

Comments:

t>\|- m am >7i

y\Ay v/e Wfifivi )

Term Spring-Term 2019 Date CF)[ (ffi j 20

There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course.

1. My overall rating of the instructor Q ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

2. My rating of the instructor s BT/ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness

3. The instructor s attitude toward sAery positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students

4. My attitude toward the instructor -EHTery positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative

5. My interest in the subject J3Wery much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased

6. Stimulation of my thinking /ery high High Moderate Low Very low

7. Contribution to my education QVery high High Moderate Low Very low

8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult Difficult ¦JEEAVerage Easy Very easy

9. Fairness and adequacy of the -ETVery good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work

10. Amount of time I spent on Very high pTiigh Moderate Low Very low this course

11. My overall rating of the course Eiftfery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor

Your major? C/W / / vA V\ Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? 3.2.

Your class level? 2 2 2- Grade you expect to receive in this course? /

Comments: T 1 h o r c sul W'A P«* fn&Y»v*< itx bacM. ALt vi rf ¦ - > ¦ - 1 7