DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars-Phobos-Deimos Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars-Phobos-Deimos Study National Aeronautics and Space Administration Considerations for Designing a Human Mission to the Martian Moons 2013 Space Challenge California Institute of Technology March 25-29, 2013 Presented by Dan Mazanek – NASA Langley Research Center NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team (HAT) Primary Team Members: Paul Abell (JSC), Jeff Antol (LaRC), Brent Barbee (GSFC), David Beaty (JPL), Deborah Bass (JPL), Julie Castillo-Rogez (JPL), David Coan (JSC), Tony Colaprete (ARC), Kevin Daugherty (LaRC), Bret Drake (JSC), Kevin Earle (LaRC), Lee Graham (JSC), Mike Hembree (JSC), Steve Hoffman (JSC), Sharon Jefferies (LaRC), Ruthan Lewis (GSFC), Mark Lupisella (GSFC), Dan Mazanek (LaRC – Study Lead) and David Reeves (LaRC) 1 One Man Musings on Ideas “He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.” – Thomas Jefferson Third President of the United States 2 Overview of HAT Mars-Phobos-Deimos Study Background: In early 2012, members of the NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team (HAT) developed a preliminary Destination Mission Concept (DMC) for the Martian moons and provided inputs for potential establishment of a future Design Reference Mission (DRM). Goal: Determine whether an opposition-class mission (short-stay of ~30-90 days in the Mars system) provides sufficient time to meet a worthwhile number of the science and exploration objectives at Phobos, at Deimos, and in Mars orbit, or if a conjunction-class mission (long-stay of ~450-540 days in the Mars system) is required. Context: Mars-Phobos-Deimos (MPD) conceptual mission was envisioned as a follow-on to a human mission to a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) and as a possible preliminary step prior to a human landing on Mars. Mars-Phobos-Deimos conceptual mission is currently not a NASA DRM, but it could be! 3 Mars Ballistic Trajectory Classes – Mars Orbital A trip to Mars with a return back to Earth is a double rendezvous problem. • The first rendezvous outbound, with Mars, must be dealt with considering its influence on the second rendezvous, inbound with Earth. • Practical considerations dictate favorable, and different, planetary alignments relative to the Sun for outbound and inbound transfers. MARS MARS ARRIVAL ARRIVAL MARS DEPARTURE EARTH RETURN SUN g SUN g MARS DEPARTURE EARTH EARTH EARTH RETURN DEPARTURE DEPARTURE VENUS SWING-BY Short-Stay Missions (Opposition Class) Long-Stay Missions (Conjunction Class) Variations of missions with short Mars surface stays Variations about the minimum energy mission. and may include Venus swing-by. 4 Earth-Mars-Earth Missions - Key Considerations Short-Stay (Opposition Class) Missions • Non-optimum transfers which result in greater energy requirements – total transfer energy increases as stay time increases. • Characterized by relatively short periods in spent in the vicinity of Mars (generally 30-60 days). • In such, these missions will tend to be highly scripted with pre-planned operational timelines. • Due to the short time at Mars, there will be less time available for mission re- planning due to contingencies or large unanticipated discoveries. Long-Stay (Conjunction Class) Missions • “Minimum Energy” transfers both outbound to, and inbound from, Mars. • Characterized by long stay in the vicinity of Mars (330-560 days) and overall long mission durations (900+ days). • These long stay missions provide ample time for re-planning mission operations. • It is envisioned that upon arrival at Mars a very pre-planned scripted operational scenario will be followed. As the mission evolves, a more free-flowing collaborative (with Earth) scenario would follow. 5 Short Stay Orbital Mission Concept High Thrust Missions 60-Days at Mars Phobos Deimos Mars Orbit High Mars Orbit Mars Orbit Trans-Earth (250 x 33,813 km) Insertion Injection Mars Orbit Insertion Crew from Mars Crew to Mars Pre-Deploy Cargo Deep Space Deep Space Maneuver or Maneuver or Venus Swing- Venus Swing- by if viable by if viable Earth Slow-Down Trans-Mars Maneuver Ref. Assembly Injection (as required) Orbit (407 km circ) # SLS-130 Launches # SLS-130 Launches Direct Earth Entry 6 Long Stay Orbital Design Reference Mission High Thrust Missions 330-560-Days at Mars Phobos Deimos Mars Orbit High Mars Orbit Mars Orbit Trans-Earth (250 x 33,813 km) Insertion Injection Mars Orbit Insertion Crew from Mars Crew to Mars Pre-Deploy Cargo Deep Space Deep Space Maneuver or Maneuver or Venus Swing- Venus Swing- by if viable by if viable Earth Slow-Down Trans-Mars Maneuver Ref. Assembly Injection (as required) Orbit (407 km circ) # SLS-130 Launches # SLS-130 Launches Direct Earth Entry 7 Mission Parameters for Typical Missions Crew Mission from LEO to Mars Orbit and Return Conjunction Class Missions Delta-V LEO Departure Conjunction Mission Assumptions: Earth Arrival Slowdown (0 - 0 km/s) Inbound DSM (0 - 0 km/s) Trans-Earth Injection (0.9 - 1.8 km/s) Mars Orbital Maneuvers (0 - 0 km/s) • These ∆Vs are for the crew vehicle from LEO, to Mars Mars Orbit Insertion (0.9 - 1.9 km/s) Outbound DSM (0 - 0 km/s) Earth Departure Delta-v (3.8 - 4.4 km/s) orbit, and return (green leg of the bat charts). Orbital 16 maneuvers required for exploration in the Martian 14 system not included 12 10 • v (km/s) 400 km circular orbit at Earth, free choice of inclination - 8 • Propulsive capture into 1-Sol equatorial orbit at Mars 6 (250 x 33,813 km) Total DeltaTotal 4 • Direct Earth entry up to 12.2 km/s 2 0 Earth Departure Opportunity Opposition Mission Assumptions: Opposition Class Missions • These ∆Vs are for the crew vehicle from LEO, to Mars orbit, and return (green leg of the bat charts). Orbital Delta-V LEO Departure Earth Arrival Slowdown (0 - 1.1 km/s) Inbound DSM (0 - 2.9 km/s) maneuvers required for exploration in the Martian Trans-Earth Injection (1 - 3.5 km/s) Mars Orbital Maneuvers (0 - 0 km/s) Mars Orbit Insertion (0.9 - 3.8 km/s) Outbound DSM (0 - 2.9 km/s) system not included here. Earth Departure Delta-v (3.9 - 5.4 km/s) 16 • 400 km circular orbit at Earth, free choice of inclination 14 • Propulsive capture into 1-Sol orbit at Mars (250 x 12 33,813 km) 10 v v (km/s) - 8 • Plane change to capture into departure orbit at Mars arrival 6 Total DeltaTotal 4 • Up to 60 days in Martian system (arrival to departure) 2 • Does not include orbital maneuvers required for 0 exploration in the Martian system • Direct Earth entry up to 13.0 km/s Earth Departure Opportunity 8 Example Variation in Mission Duration Conjunction Class Missions Mission Duration Inbound (190 - 360 d) At Mars (330 - 560 d) Outbound (200 - 350 d) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Total Mission Mission Total Duration (Days) 0 Earth Departure Opportunity Opposition Class (60 Day Stay) Missions Mission Duration Inbound (130 - 560 d) At Mars (60 - 60 d) Outbound (140 - 530 d) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Total Mission Mission Total Duration (Days) 0 Earth Departure Opportunity 9 Mission Parameters for Typical Missions Mass Constrained Trajectories Closest Perihelion Distance Conjunction Min Perihelion (0.98 - 1 km/s) Opposition Min Perihelion (0.5 - 1.02 km/s) Venus Distance Mercury Distance 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Closest PerihelionClosest Distance (AU) 0.0 Earth Departure Opportunity Equivalent Earth Entry Speed Conjunction Earth Entry (11.5 - 12.2 km/s) Opposition Earth Entry (11.5 - 13.6 km/s) Orion Entry Speed Limit 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 Equivalent Equivalent Earth Entry Speed (km/s) 10.0 Earth Departure Opportunity 10 Example ∆V* versus Mission Duration – 2033 Opportunity Crew Vehicle Total Delta-V Opposition Class - 2033 "Good" Opportunity 60 20 Day Stay 40 Day Stay 60 Day Stay 80 Day Stay 50 100 Day Stay Conjunction Opposition Class “Short-Stay” Conjunction Class “Long-Stay” 40 60-Day One-Way Transits v (km/s) - 30 Stay Time Varies Opposition Class (60 Day Stay) Missions(550-730 Days) Total Delta Total 20 Mission Duration Inbound (130 - 560 d) At Mars (60 - 60 d) Outbound (140 - 530 d) 1200 200-Day One-Way Transits ORBIT ASSUMPTIONS 1000 Earth Departure Orbit = 400 X 400 km 10 Mars Arrival Oribt = 250 X 33,813 km Mars Departure Oribt = 250 X 33,813 km 800 Direct Entry at Earth Return PLANETARY ARRIVAL ASSUMPTIONS Mars Propulsive Capture 600 Capture Plane: As is No Venus Swing-by Direct Earth Entry @ 13 km/s 0 400 - 200 200 400 600 800 1,000 Total Mission Mission Total Duration (Days) Total Mission Duration (Days) 0 Trajectory Set: 27 January 2012 * ∆Vs do not include any orbital maneuvers required at Mars Earth Departure Opportunity 11 Example ∆V* versus Mission Duration – 2041 Opportunity Crew Vehicle Total Delta-V Opposition Class - 2041 "Bad" Opportunity 60 20 Day Stay Opposition Class “Short-Stay” Conjunction Class “Long-Stay” 40 Day Stay 60 Day Stay 80 Day Stay 50 100 Day Stay Conjunction 40 v (km/s) - 60-Day One-Way Transits 30 Stay Time Varies Opposition Class (60 Day Stay) Missions(550-730 Days) Total Delta Total 20 Mission Duration Inbound (130 - 560 d) At Mars (60 - 60 d) Outbound (140 - 530 d) 1200 200-Day One-Way Transits ORBIT ASSUMPTIONS 1000 Earth Departure Orbit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Telling Time on Mars 41
    Telling Time on Mars 41 The InSight Lander will arrive at Mars on September 20, 2016 according to Earth Time, but when will it arrive according to Mars Time? One Earth Day is exactly 24 hours long, so that the time between two High Noons is exactly 24 hours. But Mars rotates a bit more slowly and by Earth units, one Mars Day (called a Sol) is 24 hours and 40 minutes long. This photo was taken by the NASA Phoenix Lander on Sol 90, which is Earth date August 25, 2008 The Curiosity Rover can only safely move during the Martian daytime. This is when scientists on Earth can use TV cameras to watch where the rover is traveling. The Martian day is 40 minutes longer then the Earth day. That means scientists have to move their work schedule forward by 40 minutes each Earth day to keep up with sunrise and sunset on Mars. The rover landed on August 5, 2012 at about 10:30 pm Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), which was defined as Sol 0 for this mission. All of the navigation is performed by Navigation Engineers working at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Problem 1 - What time and date will it be on Earth on Sol 5? Problem 2 - Suppose that sunrise at the Curiosity lander happened on February 16, 2013 at 5:20 pm Pacific Standard Time (Sol 190 at 6:00 am Local Mars Time). A Navigation Engineer begins his work shift exactly at that moment. When will his shift have to start after 5 Sols have passed on Mars? Problem 3 – How many Sols have to elapse before his work shift once again starts at the same Earth time of 5:20 pm PST? Space Math http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Answer Key 41 Mars Sunrise and Sunset Tables http://www.curiosityrover.com/sundata/ Problem 1 - What time and date will it be on Earth on Sol 5? Answer: This will be 5 x (1 day and 40 minutes) added to August 5 at 10:30 pm PDT.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mars Architecture
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Mars Architecture Tara Polsgrove NASA Human Mars Study Team 15th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 11, 2018 Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN Gateway Initial ConfigurationLunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (Notional) Orion 4 5 A Brief History of Human Exploration Beyond LEO America at DPT / NEXT NASA Case the Threshold Constellation National Studies Program Lunar Review of Commission First Lunar Architecture U.S. Human on Space Outpost Team Spaceflight Plans Committee Pathways to Exploration Columbia Challenger 1980 1990 2000 2010 Bush 41 Bush 43 7kObama HAT/EMC MSC Speech Speech Speech Report of the 90-Day Study on Human Exploration of the Moon and Mars NASA’s Journey to National Aeronautics and November 1989 Global Leadership Space Administration Mars Exploration and 90-Day Study Mars Design Mars Design Roadmap America’s Reference Mars Design Reference Future in Reference Mission 1.0 Exploration Architecture Space Mission 3.0 System 5.0 Exploration Architecture Blueprint Study 6 Exploring the Mars Mission Design Tradespace • A myriad of choices define
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Traces on the Martian Moons and Structural Lineaments
    Flow folds of viscous ice-rock mixture in Phobos and Deimos(Martian moons) Pedram Aftabi * Introduction: Mars has two very small satellites called soil change to dry soils after few Phobos and Deimos( Hall 1887 reviewed in[7]) with minutes(subscribed).Therefore the ice rock mixture 22.2 and 12.6 km across respectively[15]which decreased in the volume and contracted in two type of surfaced by deposits[5]as a thick regolith or dust and the external shape as ellipsoid and the spherical(Fig4). with a significant interior ice or ice and rock mixture[8,4&6]. The small rocky moons of Mars, Deimos and Phobos, are irregular in shape and comparable in size to the asteroid Gaspra (Fig1[7]). Fig4-Shrinkage of the moon by evaporation of the ice matrix. Fig1-Martian moons Phobos,Deimos and the asteroid Gaspra(see b)spherical shrinkage c)ellipsoid shrinkage d)shrinkage folds in www.NASA.Gov). section2 of b e)shrinkage folds in the section3 of c compare to All Martian moons have irregular shapes(to ellipsoid), the primary phobos. F)The folds from top to the bottom in the upper most part of phobos. testament to their violent histories(Figs2&4). Their surfaces are distinctly different, most likely because of The PDMS 36[10] suggested for modeling viscous materials very different impact histories(Fig3 from like salt or ice [9, 1, 2&3]. Sand and PDMS mixture is good www.NASA.Gov).but the lines in this fig seen both in material for the simulations of the Ice and basalt articles in the phobos and Deimos[12,13]but presented sharp on the Martian moons[15].
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Imager for Mars' Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX
    Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:128 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00740-4 Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX Svein-Erik Hamran1 · David A. Paige2 · Hans E.F. Amundsen3 · Tor Berger 4 · Sverre Brovoll4 · Lynn Carter5 · Leif Damsgård4 · Henning Dypvik1 · Jo Eide6 · Sigurd Eide1 · Rebecca Ghent7 · Øystein Helleren4 · Jack Kohler8 · Mike Mellon9 · Daniel C. Nunes10 · Dirk Plettemeier11 · Kathryn Rowe2 · Patrick Russell2 · Mats Jørgen Øyan4 Received: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment (RIMFAX) is a Ground Pen- etrating Radar on the Mars 2020 mission’s Perseverance rover, which is planned to land near a deltaic landform in Jezero crater. RIMFAX will add a new dimension to rover investiga- tions of Mars by providing the capability to image the shallow subsurface beneath the rover. The principal goals of the RIMFAX investigation are to image subsurface structure, and to provide information regarding subsurface composition. Data provided by RIMFAX will aid Perseverance’s mission to explore the ancient habitability of its field area and to select a set of promising geologic samples for analysis, caching, and eventual return to Earth. RIM- FAX is a Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar, which transmits a signal swept through a range of frequencies, rather than a single wide-band pulse. The operating frequency range of 150–1200 MHz covers the typical frequencies of GPR used in geology. In general, the full bandwidth (with effective center frequency of 675 MHz) will be used for The Mars 2020 Mission Edited by Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Pathfinder
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mars Pathfinder Mars Pathfinder was the first completed mission events, ending in a touchdown which left all systems in NASAs Discovery Program of low-cost, rapidly intact. developed planetary missions with highly focused sci- The landing site, an ancient flood plain in Mars ence goals. With a development time of only three northern hemisphere known as Ares Vallis, is among years and a total cost of $265 million, Pathfinder was the rockiest parts of Mars. It was chosen because sci- originally designed entists believed it to as a technology be a relatively safe demonstration of a surface to land on way to deliver an and one which con- instrumented lander tained a wide vari- and a free-ranging ety of rocks robotic rover to the deposited during a surface of the red catastrophic flood. planet. Pathfinder In the event early in not only accom- Mars history, sci- plished this goal but entists believe that also returned an the flood plain was unprecedented cut by a volume of amount of data and water the size of outlived its primary North Americas design life. Great Lakes in Pathfinder used about two weeks. an innovative The lander, for- method of directly mally named the entering the Carl Sagan Martian atmos- Memorial Station phere, assisted by a following its suc- parachute to slow cessful touchdown, its descent through and the rover, the thin Martian atmosphere and a giant system of named Sojourner after American civil rights crusader airbags to cushion the impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Rover Opportunity Working at 'Matijevic Hill' Site 30 September 2012
    Mars rover Opportunity working at 'Matijevic Hill' site 30 September 2012 reminiscent of, but different from, the iron-rich spheres nicknamed "blueberries" at the rover's landing site nearly 22 driving miles ago (35 kilometers). The small spheres at Matijevic Hill have different composition and internal structure. Opportunity's science team is evaluating a range of possibilities for how they formed. The spheres are up to about an eighth of an inch (3 millimeters) in diameter. The "blueberries" found earlier are concretions formed by the action of mineral-laden water inside rocks, but that is only one of the ways nature can make small, rounded particles. One working hypothesis, out of several, is that the new-found spherules are also concretions but with a different Rock fins up to about 1 foot (30 centimeters) tall composition. Others include that they may be dominate this scene from the panoramic camera accretionary lapilli formed in volcanic ash eruptions, (Pancam) on NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity. The component images were taken during impact spherules formed in impact events, or the 3,058th Martian day, or sol, of Opportunity's work on devitrification spherules resulting from formation of Mars (Aug. 23, 2012). The view spans an area of terrain crystals from formerly melted material. There are about 30 feet (9 meters) wide. Orbital investigation of the other possibilities, too. area has identified a possibility of clay minerals in this area of the Cape York segment of the western rim of "Right now we have multiple working hypotheses, Endeavour Crater. The view combines exposures taken and each hypothesis makes certain predictions through Pancam filters centered on wavelengths of 753 about things like what the spherules are made of nanometers (near infrared), 535 nanometers (green) and and how they are distributed," said Opportunity's 432 nanometers (violet).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos
    Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos Daniel R. Adamo 503-585-0025 Independent Astrodynamics Consultant [email protected] Paul A. Abell, NASA-Johnson Space Center Robert C. Anderson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology Brent W. Barbee, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center Joshua B. Hopkins, Lockheed Martin Thomas D. Jones, Senior Research Scientist, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Robert R. Landis, NASA-Johnson Space Center James S. Logan, Space Enterprise Institute Daniel D. Mazanek, NASA Langley Research Center Gregg Podnar, Robot Systems Architect, Aeolus Robotics Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos 1 Introduction The strategy of using robotic precursor spacecraft to prepare for human space exploration at a common venue has its roots in the Lunar Orbiter [1] and Surveyor [2] missions leading to initial Apollo Program human landings on the Moon in 1969. In connection with the current Artemis Program's human return to the Moon, robotic precursors are being instigated through NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative [3]. These lunar precursors tend to be science-centered, but they also incorporate technology demonstration objectives addressing human factors and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) knowledge gaps. Looking farther along NASA's human exploration roadmap into the 2030s and beyond, venues proximal to Mars become prominent. Robotic precursors in this context begin with the first flyby spacecraft Mariner 4 in 1965 [4], the first orbiter Mariner 9 in 1971 [5], the first lander Viking 1 in 1976 [6], and the first rover Sojourner in 1997 [7]. Exploration with these precursors and their successors has been impeded by enormously high data latency compared with lunar communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars-Base-Camp-2028.Pdf
    Mars Base Camp An Architecture for Sending Humans to Mars by 2028 A Technical Paper Presented by: Timothy Cichan Stephen A. Bailey Lockheed Martin Space Deep Space Systems, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] Scott D. Norris Robert P. Chambers Lockheed Martin Space Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] [email protected] Robert P. Chambers Joshua W. Ehrlich Lockheed Martin Space Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] [email protected] October 2016 978-1-5090-1613-6/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE Abstract—Orion, the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, near term Mars mission is compelling and feasible, is a key piece of the NASA human exploration and will highlight the required key systems. architecture for beyond earth orbit (BEO). Lockheed Martin was awarded the contracts for TABLE OF CONTENTS the design, development, test, and production for Orion up through the Exploration Mission 2 (EM- 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 2 2). Additionally, Lockheed Martin is working on 2. ARCHITECTURE PURPOSE AND TENETS ....................... 3 defining the cis-lunar Proving Ground mission 3. MISSION CAMPAIGN, INCLUDING PROVING GROUND architecture, in partnership with NASA, and MISSIONS ................................................................ 5 exploring the definition of Mars missions as the 4. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS . 7 horizon goal to provide input to the plans for 5. ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS ....................................... 13 human exploration of the solar system. This paper 6. TRAJECTORY DESIGN ............................................ 16 describes an architecture to determine the 7. SCIENCE ............................................................. 19 feasibility of a Mars Base Camp architecture 8. MARS SURFACE ACCESS FOR CREW ......................... 14 within about a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2020 Mission One Month After Landing
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1317.pdf The Mars 2020 Mission One Month After Landing. K.A. Farley1, J. Trosper2 and the Mars 2020 Science and Engineering Teams 1Caltech Pasadena, CA ([email protected]), 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA ([email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 mission was observations is an important advance and an essential successfully launched on July 30, 2020, and as of this component of Perseverance’s search for biosignatures. writing has completed 85% of its cruise to Mars with no The mission’s most sophisticated new element, the significant unexpected events. Shortly after 12:30 PM Sampling and Caching System, allows Perseverance to Pacific time on February 18, 2021, the spacecraft is collect and store samples for possible Earth return. To expected to transit the Martian atmosphere and deposit take a sample, this system selects one of the 38 the Perseverance rover on the planet’s surface. This ultraclean sample tubes from a storage assembly inside abstract summarizes the mission and its expected the rover and transfers the tube to the robotic arm that activities, focusing on the first 90 sols and the linkage then cores ~15 g of rock or regolith directly into the of the mission to a possible joint NASA-ESA Mars tube. Once returned to the rover interior, the tube is Sample Return campaign. Immediate post-landing assessed for acquired volume, a picture looking down science results will be described at the Conference. the bore is acquired, and the tube is hermetically sealed Mission Goals: The central objectives of the Mars and returned to the storage assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration Rover Surface Operations: Driving Opportunity at Meridiani Planum
    2005 IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings, October 2005, Hawaii, USA Mars Exploration Rover Surface Operations: Driving Opportunity at Meridiani Planum Jeffrey J. Biesiadecki, Eric T. Baumgartner, Robert G. Bonitz, Brian K. Cooper, Frank R. Hartman, P. Christopher Leger, Mark W. Maimone, Scott A. Maxwell, Ashitey Trebi-Ollenu, Edward W. Tunstel, John R. Wright Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA [email protected] Abstract – On January 24, 2004, the Mars Exploration gets, the rovers were required to be able to survive 90 Mar- Rover named Opportunity successfully landed in the region tian days (called “sols”), drive safely as far as 100 meters in of Mars known as Meridiani Planum, a vast plain dotted with a single sol in Viking Lander 1 (VL1) terrain, and achieve a craters where orbiting spacecraft had detected the signatures total distance of at least 600 meters over the 90 sol mission. of minerals believed to have formed in liquid water. Furthermore, the rovers were required to approach rock and The first pictures back from Opportunity revealed that the soil targets of interest as far as 2 meters away in a single sol, rover had landed in a crater roughly 20 meters in diame- with sufficient accuracy to enable immediate science instru- ter – the only sizeable crater within hundreds of meters – ment placement on the next sol without further repositioning. which became known as Eagle Crater. And in the walls of To meet these objectives, the rovers were outfitted with a this crater just meters away was the bedrock MER scientists robotic arm (the Instrument Deployment Device, or IDD) for had been hoping to find, which would ultimately prove that placing the science instruments on rocks and soil [5], a six this region of Mars did indeed have a watery past.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Results from the Risk Management Program for the Mars Microrover Flight Experiment
    Summary of Results from the Risk Management program for the Mars Microrover Flight Experiment Robert Shishko, Ph.D. and Jacob R. Matijevic, Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grov'e Drive, Pasadena CA 91109 volume, mass, and power for both the microrover Abstract. On 4 July 1997, the Mars and its instrument (APXS) payload, microrover Pathfinder landed on the surface of Mars carrying interfaces with the Pathfinder spacecraft, and use of the first planetary rover, known as the Sojourner. some commercial and MiI-Spec parts. Operations Formally known as the Microrover Flight risks arose because of an unknown landed Experiment (MFEX), the Sojourner was a low cost, configuration for the lander, use of new approaches high-risk technology demonstration, in which new to command, control, and communication, and risk management techniques were tried. This paper uncertain environmental conditions. summarizes the activities and results of the effort to conduct a low-cost, yet meaningful risk This paper summarizes the activities and management program for the MFEX. The specific results of the effort to conduct a low-cost, yet activities focused on cost, performance, schedule, meaningful risk management program for the and operations risks. Just as the systems MFEX, which was originally designated as a high- engineering process was iterative and produced risk (Class D) payload. The specific objectives of successive refinements of requirements, designs, the MFEX risk management effort were: etc., so was the risk management process. Qualitative risk assessments were performed first (a) Define and implement a risk to gain some insights for refining the microrover management process tailored to design and operations concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Curiosity: Results from the Mars Science Laboratory
    John_Klein area NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS Results from the Horton Newsom MSL Science Team Mars Science Laboratory 7/28/2015 Acknowledgements There are more than 250 scientists (and untold engineers) working on the Mars Science Laboratory mission… The UNM team - Horton Newsom, Ines Belgacem, Ryan Jackson, Zach Gallegos, Beth Ha, Penny King (now ANU), Nina Lanza (now LANL), Ann Ollila, Suzi Gordon (now LANL), Jeff Berger (now Guelph), Josh Williams (now Western Washington), Amy Williams (now UC Davis) , with Wolf Elston, Anya Rosen-Gooding (now United World College),and other colleagues – and BT2! BT2 –basalt from NM, APXS Calibration target, cut and polished in Northrop Hall Curiosity’s primary scientific goal is to explore and quantitatively assess a local region on Mars’ surface as a potential habitat for life, past or present • Biological potential • Geology and geochemistry • Role of water • Surface radiation NASA/JPL-Caltech Curiosity’s Science Objectives Synergy with other missions and Mars Science • Early missions – Explains Viking Life detection results – presence of perchlorate confirmed • Other missions – Helps interpret results for Opportunity at Endeavor crater (e.g. L. Crumpler, NMMNH) • Martian meteorites – Study of NWA 7034 meteorites at UNM will provide detailed data to help interpret data from Curiosity ChemCam team – Roof of the Observatory of Paris Team meeting – Paris! Transit of Venus – Ceiling of our meeting room in the Observatory of Paris (founded by Louis the 14th). At the test-bed during Operational Readiness Test in March Wheel Base: 2.8 m Height of Deck: 1.1 m Ground Clearance: 0.66 m Height of Mast: 2.2 m Mass: 900 kg The Target – Gale Crater Martian Landing Sites PHOENIX VIKING 2 VIKING 1 PATHFINDER OPPORTUNITY Curiosity SPIRIT A field of approximately 54 different landing sites was ultimately narrowed down to Gale Crater http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA15958 NASA/JPL-Caltech NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/DLR/FU Berlin/MSSS Target: Gale Crater and Mount Sharp (5.5 km, 18,000 ft high) Launch Nov.
    [Show full text]