DOCSLIB.ORG

Choosing Mars Time: Analysis of the Mars Exploration Rover Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Choosing Mars Time: Analysis of the Mars Exploration Rover Experience Choosing Mars Time: Analysis of the Mars Exploration Rover Experience Deborah S. Bass NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mail Stop T1718 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 818-393-5189 [email protected] Roxana C. Wales, SAIC NASA Ames Research Center Valerie L. Shalin, Wright State University Abstract—This paper focuses on the Mars Exploration or “sol”, is approximately thirty-nine minutes longer than Rover (MER) mission’s management decision to work on an Earth day. Mission planners chose to link the Earth- Mars Time and the implications of that decision on the based operations work to the Martian day-night cycle to tactical surface operations process as personnel planned optimize the work of the solar powered rovers and maximize activities and created a new command load for work on each precious rover time in the Martian environment. Each day Martian sol. The paper also looks at tools that supported the surface operations personnel produced a planned set of complexities of Mars Time operations, and makes some activities and associated commands that were sent to the comparisons between Earth and Mars Time scheduling. 12 rovers so that they could do their work of data collection beginning on the following morning at rover wake-up. TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 1 (below) shows the Mars Exploration Rover 1. INTRODUCTION: MISSION OVERVIEW........... 1 mission timeline that begins with the receipt of data from WHAT IS MARS TIME? ............................................ 2 the spacecraft and completes with a set of commands 2. MARS TIME TRADE STUDY ........................... 2 approved and radiated to the spacecraft for execution the CONSIDERED STAFFING OPTIONS.............................. 3 following morning. The time system portrayed in this EVALUATION METRICS ........................................... 3 figure is Mars Local Solar time (MLST), approximately EARTH TIME – PRIME SHIFT .................................... 3 thirty-nine minutes longer than an Earth day. In the chart, OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE TRADE STUDY.............. 3 action steps are represented by royal blue bars, and meetings TRADE STUDY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and handovers are represented by green bars. The light blue ........................................................................... 3 bar indicates the time when the rovers execute commands on 3. MISSION EXPERIENCE OF MARS TIME ............. 4 the Martian surface. In the Mars Time scenario, the Earth- LOCAL PERSONNEL VS. REMOTE PERSONNEL .............. 4 based team works while the rovers sleep. Grey represents the ORBITING SPACECRAFT AND DATA RETURN window in which data will be returned from Mars. While COMPLEXITY......................................................... 5 the grey bar appears long, it represents a window in which a 4. KEEPING TRACK OF TIME .............................. 6 30-minute transfer of data will occur. The time that data is 5. EXTENDED MISSION OPERATIONS.................... 8 returned varies within the window, and is predictable several CHASING THE DOWNLINK DATA RETURN ................... 8 days in advance. 6. CONCLUSIONS .............................................. 9 IMPLICATIONS FOR MISSION MANAGEMENT............... 9 Figure 1 allows for the worst-case scenario with regard to 7. REFERENCES.............................................. 10 late data arrival leaving enough time to ensure that the 8. BIOGRAPHY............................................... 10 Earth-based team can produce the necessary results in the shortest time possible. Data can return to Earth either directly from the rovers on the planet surface or from 1. INTRODUCTION: MISSION OVERVIEW spacecraft currently orbiting Mars. The four vertical bars at the top represent all options for returning relayed data NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover (MER) Project through orbiting spacecraft (Mars Global Surveyor, or successfully landed two spacecraft carrying identical rovers MGS, and Odyssey, or ODY); the light blue bar represents on opposite sides of the surface of Mars in January 2004 data returned directly from the planet’s surface. Four and conducted two nominal surface missions staffed on satellite relay possibilities are described but not all are “Mars Time” for 90 Martian days each [1]. A Martian day, routinely used each sol. The 10-hour “downlink shift” staff analyze the received data and make recommendations for 1 0-7803-8870-4/05/$20.00©2005IEEE rover activity execution, while the two 10-hour “uplink shifts” turn the recommendations into commands the 2 IEEEAC paper #1162, Version 7, Updated December 10, 2004 spacecraft can understand. The process, as planned, 1 Mars Local Solar Time 2:00 9:00 4:00 1:00 6:00 3:00 8:00 0:00 5:00 7:00 10:00 12:00 17:00 22:00 14:00 19:00 16:00 11:00 21:00 13:00 18:00 23:00 20:00 15:00 UHF MGS ODY MGS ODY Direct-To-Earth/Direct-From-Earth Sol n-1 Sequence Plan Review Sol n Science Context Meeting Real-Time Monitoring Downlink Product Generation Tactical Sci Assess/Obs Planning Sci Downlink Assessment Meeting Tactical End-of-Sol Eng Assess Eng Skeleton Activity Plan Update Engineering Leads Tagup Science Ops Working Group Meeting End-of-Sol Science Discussion Activity Refinement/Seq Assignment Selected Act Expansion/Constraint Activity Carving Act Plan Integration and Validation Activity Plan Tagup Activity Plan Product Generation Activity Plan Approval Meeting Sequence Plan Design Sequence Development Master/Submaster Walkthru Integrate Sequences Command Product Generation Sequence Validation Sequence Review Product Generation Command and Radiation Approval Figure 1. Mission Timeline detailing steps between receiving data from the spacecraft and sending a complete set of instructions to the rover. (Courtesy, Science Team) originally took 19 hours to complete; by the beginning of extended mission operations, with improvements in 2. MARS TIME TRADE STUDY automation, increased staff training and expertise development, the process took an average of 8 hours. The case for Mars Time centers on the following argument: a landed spacecraft operated on solar power is a dying asset. What is Mars Time? The mission duration is limited by the amount of sunlight the solar panels receive. Further, the spacecraft may fail to Because the Martian day is approximately thirty-nine respond on any given day, and therefore it is critical to minutes longer than an Earth day, participants who worked maximize the use of that asset. Arguably, Mars Time on Mars Time reported to work later each Earth day in order optimizes that usage. However, maintaining Mars Time in to remain synchronized with the solar powered work of the an Earth time world poses problems including some typical rovers were doing. For example, a participant might report of shiftwork [2] and some that were somewhat more to work at 12 noon on one day, 12:39 the next day, 1:18 surprising. the next day and so on. In addition to the daily, or “soly,” tactical process of planning and commanding on Mars, other Early in the development of the mission, in response to a mission work, known as the strategic process, focused on design review, MER management launched a study to help planning over longer periods of time and was responsible determine whether to use Mars Time staffing. They were for long term mission activities and resource allocations. looking for an optimal operations schedule for coordinating The strategic processes included coordination of the work of the work of two hundred and fifty mission personnel on the two missions, coordination and allocation of Deep Earth who would be operating dual rovers on Mars. The Space Network and orbital communication coverage within main question was whether operations processes should be and across missions, determination of overall rover resource conducted on an Earth time schedule or a Mars Time situations and public outreach activities. Tactical work on schedule. The MER staffing options had to consider the MER was done on Mars Time, while strategic work was following criteria: done on Earth time. • Allow for personnel to be fully trained for surface This paper focuses on the MER mission decision to work operations before landing day, on Mars Time, the implications of that decision on the • Acknowledge that personnel would take longer to tactical surface Mars Time work, the support needed from do their work early in the mission while they related tools and the impact that Mars Time had on the developed expertise, work of personnel as they planned activities and created a • Provide the capability to command every Martin new command load for each Martian sol. sol, 2 • Provide margin for dealing with contingencies situations and respond to ad-hoc science team requests was within the nominal timeline, maximized. • Minimize the impact of scheduling on personal lives, Earth time – Prime Shift • Be sustainable over the life of the nominal mission. This option employs a single long shift each day (up to 8 • Ensure communication of key information across hours), so that the rover lacks a ground team “babysitter” for shift boundaries, as many as 16 hours per day. People keep the same time • Possess resiliency in the face of anomalies, schedules each day and stop at the end of the shift, • Support operations of two rover missions independent of Mars Time. Only eight hours between the simultaneously, Mars afternoon downlink and the uplink the following Mars • Maximize the use of shared facilities, such as morning can be populated with rover activities,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Telling Time on Mars 41
    Telling Time on Mars 41 The InSight Lander will arrive at Mars on September 20, 2016 according to Earth Time, but when will it arrive according to Mars Time? One Earth Day is exactly 24 hours long, so that the time between two High Noons is exactly 24 hours. But Mars rotates a bit more slowly and by Earth units, one Mars Day (called a Sol) is 24 hours and 40 minutes long. This photo was taken by the NASA Phoenix Lander on Sol 90, which is Earth date August 25, 2008 The Curiosity Rover can only safely move during the Martian daytime. This is when scientists on Earth can use TV cameras to watch where the rover is traveling. The Martian day is 40 minutes longer then the Earth day. That means scientists have to move their work schedule forward by 40 minutes each Earth day to keep up with sunrise and sunset on Mars. The rover landed on August 5, 2012 at about 10:30 pm Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), which was defined as Sol 0 for this mission. All of the navigation is performed by Navigation Engineers working at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Problem 1 - What time and date will it be on Earth on Sol 5? Problem 2 - Suppose that sunrise at the Curiosity lander happened on February 16, 2013 at 5:20 pm Pacific Standard Time (Sol 190 at 6:00 am Local Mars Time). A Navigation Engineer begins his work shift exactly at that moment. When will his shift have to start after 5 Sols have passed on Mars? Problem 3 – How many Sols have to elapse before his work shift once again starts at the same Earth time of 5:20 pm PST? Space Math http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Answer Key 41 Mars Sunrise and Sunset Tables http://www.curiosityrover.com/sundata/ Problem 1 - What time and date will it be on Earth on Sol 5? Answer: This will be 5 x (1 day and 40 minutes) added to August 5 at 10:30 pm PDT.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mars Architecture
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Mars Architecture Tara Polsgrove NASA Human Mars Study Team 15th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 11, 2018 Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN Gateway Initial ConfigurationLunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (Notional) Orion 4 5 A Brief History of Human Exploration Beyond LEO America at DPT / NEXT NASA Case the Threshold Constellation National Studies Program Lunar Review of Commission First Lunar Architecture U.S. Human on Space Outpost Team Spaceflight Plans Committee Pathways to Exploration Columbia Challenger 1980 1990 2000 2010 Bush 41 Bush 43 7kObama HAT/EMC MSC Speech Speech Speech Report of the 90-Day Study on Human Exploration of the Moon and Mars NASA’s Journey to National Aeronautics and November 1989 Global Leadership Space Administration Mars Exploration and 90-Day Study Mars Design Mars Design Roadmap America’s Reference Mars Design Reference Future in Reference Mission 1.0 Exploration Architecture Space Mission 3.0 System 5.0 Exploration Architecture Blueprint Study 6 Exploring the Mars Mission Design Tradespace • A myriad of choices define
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Traces on the Martian Moons and Structural Lineaments
    Flow folds of viscous ice-rock mixture in Phobos and Deimos(Martian moons) Pedram Aftabi * Introduction: Mars has two very small satellites called soil change to dry soils after few Phobos and Deimos( Hall 1887 reviewed in[7]) with minutes(subscribed).Therefore the ice rock mixture 22.2 and 12.6 km across respectively[15]which decreased in the volume and contracted in two type of surfaced by deposits[5]as a thick regolith or dust and the external shape as ellipsoid and the spherical(Fig4). with a significant interior ice or ice and rock mixture[8,4&6]. The small rocky moons of Mars, Deimos and Phobos, are irregular in shape and comparable in size to the asteroid Gaspra (Fig1[7]). Fig4-Shrinkage of the moon by evaporation of the ice matrix. Fig1-Martian moons Phobos,Deimos and the asteroid Gaspra(see b)spherical shrinkage c)ellipsoid shrinkage d)shrinkage folds in www.NASA.Gov). section2 of b e)shrinkage folds in the section3 of c compare to All Martian moons have irregular shapes(to ellipsoid), the primary phobos. F)The folds from top to the bottom in the upper most part of phobos. testament to their violent histories(Figs2&4). Their surfaces are distinctly different, most likely because of The PDMS 36[10] suggested for modeling viscous materials very different impact histories(Fig3 from like salt or ice [9, 1, 2&3]. Sand and PDMS mixture is good www.NASA.Gov).but the lines in this fig seen both in material for the simulations of the Ice and basalt articles in the phobos and Deimos[12,13]but presented sharp on the Martian moons[15].
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Imager for Mars' Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX
    Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:128 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00740-4 Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX Svein-Erik Hamran1 · David A. Paige2 · Hans E.F. Amundsen3 · Tor Berger 4 · Sverre Brovoll4 · Lynn Carter5 · Leif Damsgård4 · Henning Dypvik1 · Jo Eide6 · Sigurd Eide1 · Rebecca Ghent7 · Øystein Helleren4 · Jack Kohler8 · Mike Mellon9 · Daniel C. Nunes10 · Dirk Plettemeier11 · Kathryn Rowe2 · Patrick Russell2 · Mats Jørgen Øyan4 Received: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment (RIMFAX) is a Ground Pen- etrating Radar on the Mars 2020 mission’s Perseverance rover, which is planned to land near a deltaic landform in Jezero crater. RIMFAX will add a new dimension to rover investiga- tions of Mars by providing the capability to image the shallow subsurface beneath the rover. The principal goals of the RIMFAX investigation are to image subsurface structure, and to provide information regarding subsurface composition. Data provided by RIMFAX will aid Perseverance’s mission to explore the ancient habitability of its field area and to select a set of promising geologic samples for analysis, caching, and eventual return to Earth. RIM- FAX is a Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar, which transmits a signal swept through a range of frequencies, rather than a single wide-band pulse. The operating frequency range of 150–1200 MHz covers the typical frequencies of GPR used in geology. In general, the full bandwidth (with effective center frequency of 675 MHz) will be used for The Mars 2020 Mission Edited by Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Pathfinder
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mars Pathfinder Mars Pathfinder was the first completed mission events, ending in a touchdown which left all systems in NASAs Discovery Program of low-cost, rapidly intact. developed planetary missions with highly focused sci- The landing site, an ancient flood plain in Mars ence goals. With a development time of only three northern hemisphere known as Ares Vallis, is among years and a total cost of $265 million, Pathfinder was the rockiest parts of Mars. It was chosen because sci- originally designed entists believed it to as a technology be a relatively safe demonstration of a surface to land on way to deliver an and one which con- instrumented lander tained a wide vari- and a free-ranging ety of rocks robotic rover to the deposited during a surface of the red catastrophic flood. planet. Pathfinder In the event early in not only accom- Mars history, sci- plished this goal but entists believe that also returned an the flood plain was unprecedented cut by a volume of amount of data and water the size of outlived its primary North Americas design life. Great Lakes in Pathfinder used about two weeks. an innovative The lander, for- method of directly mally named the entering the Carl Sagan Martian atmos- Memorial Station phere, assisted by a following its suc- parachute to slow cessful touchdown, its descent through and the rover, the thin Martian atmosphere and a giant system of named Sojourner after American civil rights crusader airbags to cushion the impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Rover Opportunity Working at 'Matijevic Hill' Site 30 September 2012
    Mars rover Opportunity working at 'Matijevic Hill' site 30 September 2012 reminiscent of, but different from, the iron-rich spheres nicknamed "blueberries" at the rover's landing site nearly 22 driving miles ago (35 kilometers). The small spheres at Matijevic Hill have different composition and internal structure. Opportunity's science team is evaluating a range of possibilities for how they formed. The spheres are up to about an eighth of an inch (3 millimeters) in diameter. The "blueberries" found earlier are concretions formed by the action of mineral-laden water inside rocks, but that is only one of the ways nature can make small, rounded particles. One working hypothesis, out of several, is that the new-found spherules are also concretions but with a different Rock fins up to about 1 foot (30 centimeters) tall composition. Others include that they may be dominate this scene from the panoramic camera accretionary lapilli formed in volcanic ash eruptions, (Pancam) on NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity. The component images were taken during impact spherules formed in impact events, or the 3,058th Martian day, or sol, of Opportunity's work on devitrification spherules resulting from formation of Mars (Aug. 23, 2012). The view spans an area of terrain crystals from formerly melted material. There are about 30 feet (9 meters) wide. Orbital investigation of the other possibilities, too. area has identified a possibility of clay minerals in this area of the Cape York segment of the western rim of "Right now we have multiple working hypotheses, Endeavour Crater. The view combines exposures taken and each hypothesis makes certain predictions through Pancam filters centered on wavelengths of 753 about things like what the spherules are made of nanometers (near infrared), 535 nanometers (green) and and how they are distributed," said Opportunity's 432 nanometers (violet).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos
    Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos Daniel R. Adamo 503-585-0025 Independent Astrodynamics Consultant [email protected] Paul A. Abell, NASA-Johnson Space Center Robert C. Anderson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology Brent W. Barbee, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center Joshua B. Hopkins, Lockheed Martin Thomas D. Jones, Senior Research Scientist, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Robert R. Landis, NASA-Johnson Space Center James S. Logan, Space Enterprise Institute Daniel D. Mazanek, NASA Langley Research Center Gregg Podnar, Robot Systems Architect, Aeolus Robotics Exploration Leading to Low-Latency Telepresence on Mars from Deimos 1 Introduction The strategy of using robotic precursor spacecraft to prepare for human space exploration at a common venue has its roots in the Lunar Orbiter [1] and Surveyor [2] missions leading to initial Apollo Program human landings on the Moon in 1969. In connection with the current Artemis Program's human return to the Moon, robotic precursors are being instigated through NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative [3]. These lunar precursors tend to be science-centered, but they also incorporate technology demonstration objectives addressing human factors and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) knowledge gaps. Looking farther along NASA's human exploration roadmap into the 2030s and beyond, venues proximal to Mars become prominent. Robotic precursors in this context begin with the first flyby spacecraft Mariner 4 in 1965 [4], the first orbiter Mariner 9 in 1971 [5], the first lander Viking 1 in 1976 [6], and the first rover Sojourner in 1997 [7]. Exploration with these precursors and their successors has been impeded by enormously high data latency compared with lunar communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars-Base-Camp-2028.Pdf
    Mars Base Camp An Architecture for Sending Humans to Mars by 2028 A Technical Paper Presented by: Timothy Cichan Stephen A. Bailey Lockheed Martin Space Deep Space Systems, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] Scott D. Norris Robert P. Chambers Lockheed Martin Space Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] [email protected] Robert P. Chambers Joshua W. Ehrlich Lockheed Martin Space Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] [email protected] October 2016 978-1-5090-1613-6/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE Abstract—Orion, the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, near term Mars mission is compelling and feasible, is a key piece of the NASA human exploration and will highlight the required key systems. architecture for beyond earth orbit (BEO). Lockheed Martin was awarded the contracts for TABLE OF CONTENTS the design, development, test, and production for Orion up through the Exploration Mission 2 (EM- 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 2 2). Additionally, Lockheed Martin is working on 2. ARCHITECTURE PURPOSE AND TENETS ....................... 3 defining the cis-lunar Proving Ground mission 3. MISSION CAMPAIGN, INCLUDING PROVING GROUND architecture, in partnership with NASA, and MISSIONS ................................................................ 5 exploring the definition of Mars missions as the 4. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS . 7 horizon goal to provide input to the plans for 5. ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS ....................................... 13 human exploration of the solar system. This paper 6. TRAJECTORY DESIGN ............................................ 16 describes an architecture to determine the 7. SCIENCE ............................................................. 19 feasibility of a Mars Base Camp architecture 8. MARS SURFACE ACCESS FOR CREW ......................... 14 within about a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2020 Mission One Month After Landing
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1317.pdf The Mars 2020 Mission One Month After Landing. K.A. Farley1, J. Trosper2 and the Mars 2020 Science and Engineering Teams 1Caltech Pasadena, CA ([email protected]), 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA ([email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 mission was observations is an important advance and an essential successfully launched on July 30, 2020, and as of this component of Perseverance’s search for biosignatures. writing has completed 85% of its cruise to Mars with no The mission’s most sophisticated new element, the significant unexpected events. Shortly after 12:30 PM Sampling and Caching System, allows Perseverance to Pacific time on February 18, 2021, the spacecraft is collect and store samples for possible Earth return. To expected to transit the Martian atmosphere and deposit take a sample, this system selects one of the 38 the Perseverance rover on the planet’s surface. This ultraclean sample tubes from a storage assembly inside abstract summarizes the mission and its expected the rover and transfers the tube to the robotic arm that activities, focusing on the first 90 sols and the linkage then cores ~15 g of rock or regolith directly into the of the mission to a possible joint NASA-ESA Mars tube. Once returned to the rover interior, the tube is Sample Return campaign. Immediate post-landing assessed for acquired volume, a picture looking down science results will be described at the Conference. the bore is acquired, and the tube is hermetically sealed Mission Goals: The central objectives of the Mars and returned to the storage assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration Rover Surface Operations: Driving Opportunity at Meridiani Planum
    2005 IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings, October 2005, Hawaii, USA Mars Exploration Rover Surface Operations: Driving Opportunity at Meridiani Planum Jeffrey J. Biesiadecki, Eric T. Baumgartner, Robert G. Bonitz, Brian K. Cooper, Frank R. Hartman, P. Christopher Leger, Mark W. Maimone, Scott A. Maxwell, Ashitey Trebi-Ollenu, Edward W. Tunstel, John R. Wright Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA [email protected] Abstract – On January 24, 2004, the Mars Exploration gets, the rovers were required to be able to survive 90 Mar- Rover named Opportunity successfully landed in the region tian days (called “sols”), drive safely as far as 100 meters in of Mars known as Meridiani Planum, a vast plain dotted with a single sol in Viking Lander 1 (VL1) terrain, and achieve a craters where orbiting spacecraft had detected the signatures total distance of at least 600 meters over the 90 sol mission. of minerals believed to have formed in liquid water. Furthermore, the rovers were required to approach rock and The first pictures back from Opportunity revealed that the soil targets of interest as far as 2 meters away in a single sol, rover had landed in a crater roughly 20 meters in diame- with sufficient accuracy to enable immediate science instru- ter – the only sizeable crater within hundreds of meters – ment placement on the next sol without further repositioning. which became known as Eagle Crater. And in the walls of To meet these objectives, the rovers were outfitted with a this crater just meters away was the bedrock MER scientists robotic arm (the Instrument Deployment Device, or IDD) for had been hoping to find, which would ultimately prove that placing the science instruments on rocks and soil [5], a six this region of Mars did indeed have a watery past.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Results from the Risk Management Program for the Mars Microrover Flight Experiment
    Summary of Results from the Risk Management program for the Mars Microrover Flight Experiment Robert Shishko, Ph.D. and Jacob R. Matijevic, Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grov'e Drive, Pasadena CA 91109 volume, mass, and power for both the microrover Abstract. On 4 July 1997, the Mars and its instrument (APXS) payload, microrover Pathfinder landed on the surface of Mars carrying interfaces with the Pathfinder spacecraft, and use of the first planetary rover, known as the Sojourner. some commercial and MiI-Spec parts. Operations Formally known as the Microrover Flight risks arose because of an unknown landed Experiment (MFEX), the Sojourner was a low cost, configuration for the lander, use of new approaches high-risk technology demonstration, in which new to command, control, and communication, and risk management techniques were tried. This paper uncertain environmental conditions. summarizes the activities and results of the effort to conduct a low-cost, yet meaningful risk This paper summarizes the activities and management program for the MFEX. The specific results of the effort to conduct a low-cost, yet activities focused on cost, performance, schedule, meaningful risk management program for the and operations risks. Just as the systems MFEX, which was originally designated as a high- engineering process was iterative and produced risk (Class D) payload. The specific objectives of successive refinements of requirements, designs, the MFEX risk management effort were: etc., so was the risk management process. Qualitative risk assessments were performed first (a) Define and implement a risk to gain some insights for refining the microrover management process tailored to design and operations concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Curiosity: Results from the Mars Science Laboratory
    John_Klein area NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS Results from the Horton Newsom MSL Science Team Mars Science Laboratory 7/28/2015 Acknowledgements There are more than 250 scientists (and untold engineers) working on the Mars Science Laboratory mission… The UNM team - Horton Newsom, Ines Belgacem, Ryan Jackson, Zach Gallegos, Beth Ha, Penny King (now ANU), Nina Lanza (now LANL), Ann Ollila, Suzi Gordon (now LANL), Jeff Berger (now Guelph), Josh Williams (now Western Washington), Amy Williams (now UC Davis) , with Wolf Elston, Anya Rosen-Gooding (now United World College),and other colleagues – and BT2! BT2 –basalt from NM, APXS Calibration target, cut and polished in Northrop Hall Curiosity’s primary scientific goal is to explore and quantitatively assess a local region on Mars’ surface as a potential habitat for life, past or present • Biological potential • Geology and geochemistry • Role of water • Surface radiation NASA/JPL-Caltech Curiosity’s Science Objectives Synergy with other missions and Mars Science • Early missions – Explains Viking Life detection results – presence of perchlorate confirmed • Other missions – Helps interpret results for Opportunity at Endeavor crater (e.g. L. Crumpler, NMMNH) • Martian meteorites – Study of NWA 7034 meteorites at UNM will provide detailed data to help interpret data from Curiosity ChemCam team – Roof of the Observatory of Paris Team meeting – Paris! Transit of Venus – Ceiling of our meeting room in the Observatory of Paris (founded by Louis the 14th). At the test-bed during Operational Readiness Test in March Wheel Base: 2.8 m Height of Deck: 1.1 m Ground Clearance: 0.66 m Height of Mast: 2.2 m Mass: 900 kg The Target – Gale Crater Martian Landing Sites PHOENIX VIKING 2 VIKING 1 PATHFINDER OPPORTUNITY Curiosity SPIRIT A field of approximately 54 different landing sites was ultimately narrowed down to Gale Crater http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA15958 NASA/JPL-Caltech NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/DLR/FU Berlin/MSSS Target: Gale Crater and Mount Sharp (5.5 km, 18,000 ft high) Launch Nov.
    [Show full text]