Courier-Pop Courier-Pop-Ssl 0. Courier-Imap Courier-Imap-Ssl 0
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Email Issues
EMAIL ISSUES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW POLICY WITH RESPECT TO EMAIL ADDRESSES A NECESSARY EMAIL SETTING WHY OUR EMAILS POSSIBLY ARRIVED LATE OR NOT AT ALL STOP USING YAHOO, NETZERO, AND JUNO EMAIL PROVIDERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NEW POLICY WITH RESPECT TO EMAIL ADDRESSES: There are two important issues here. FIRST, members must not supply CFIC with their company email addresses. That is, companies that they work for. (If you own the company, that's different.) All email on a company's server can be read by any supervisor. All it takes is one pro vaccine activist to get hold of our mobilization alerts to throw a monkey wrench in all of our efforts. Thus, do not supply me with a company email address. We can help you get an alternative to that if necesary. SECONDLY, CFIC needs members' email addresses to supply important information to mobilize parents to do things that advances our goal to enact our legislative reforms of the exemptions from vaccination. That has always been CFIC's sole agenda. CFIC has been able to keep the membership fee to zero because we don't communicate via snail mail. But people change their addresses frequently and forget to update CFIC. When this happens over the years, that member is essentually blind and deaf to us, and is no longer of any value to the coalition---your fellow parents. Therefore, it warrants me to require that members supply CFIC with their most permanent email account. That means the email address of the company in which you are paying a monthly fee for internet access, be it broadband or dialup service. -
Porting a Window Manager from Xlib to XCB
Porting a Window Manager from Xlib to XCB Arnaud Fontaine (08090091) 16 May 2008 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version pub- lished by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". Contents List of figures i List of listings ii Introduction 1 1 Backgrounds and Motivations 2 2 X Window System (X11) 6 2.1 Introduction . .6 2.2 History . .6 2.3 X Window Protocol . .7 2.3.1 Introduction . .7 2.3.2 Protocol overview . .8 2.3.3 Identifiers of resources . 10 2.3.4 Atoms . 10 2.3.5 Windows . 12 2.3.6 Pixmaps . 14 2.3.7 Events . 14 2.3.8 Keyboard and pointer . 15 2.3.9 Extensions . 17 2.4 X protocol client libraries . 18 2.4.1 Xlib . 18 2.4.1.1 Introduction . 18 2.4.1.2 Data types and functions . 18 2.4.1.3 Pros . 19 2.4.1.4 Cons . 19 2.4.1.5 Example . 20 2.4.2 XCB . 20 2.4.2.1 Introduction . 20 2.4.2.2 Data types and functions . 21 2.4.2.3 xcb-util library . 22 2.4.2.4 Pros . 22 2.4.2.5 Cons . 23 2.4.2.6 Example . 23 2.4.3 Xlib/XCB round-trip performance comparison . -
Migrationsleitfaden
Migrationsleitfaden Leitfaden für die Migration der Basissoftwarekomponenten auf Server- und Arbeitsplatz-Systemen Version 1.0 – Juli 2003 Schriftenreihe der KBSt ISSN 0179-7263 Band 57 Juli 2003 Schriftenreihe der KBSt Band 57 ISSN 0179 - 7263 Nachdruck, auch auszugsweise, ist genehmigungspflichtig Dieser Band wurde erstellt von der KBSt im Bundesministeri- um des Innern in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), dem Bundesver- waltungsamt (BVA) und der C_sar Consulting, solutions and results AG Redaktion: C_sar AG, Berlin Interessenten erhalten die derzeit lieferbaren Veröffentlichungen der KBSt und weiterführende Informationen zu den Dokumenten bei Bundesministerium des Innern Referat IT 2 (KBSt) 11014 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0) 1888 681 - 2312 Fax.: +49 (0) 1888 681 - 523121 Homepage der KBSt: http://www.kbst.bund.de 1Frau Monika Pfeiffer (mailto: [email protected]) Migrationsleitfaden Leitfaden für die Migration der Basissoftwarekomponenten auf Server- und Arbeitsplatz-Systemen Version 1.0 Juli 2003 Herausgegeben vom Bundesministerium des Innern INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1 Einleitung ........................................................................ 8 1.1 Über das Vorhaben 8 1.2 Über diesen Leitfaden 9 1.3 Hinweise zur Benutzung des Leitfadens 10 1.4 Hinweise an die Entscheider 12 1.4.1 Grundsätzliche Empfehlungen 12 1.4.2 Fortführende und ablösende Migration 13 1.4.3 Migrationswege 14 1.4.4 Vergleichbarkeit von Alternativen 14 1.4.5 Künftige Schwerpunte 15 1.4.6 Wirtschaftlichkeit 16 -
Toward an Automated Vulnerability Comparison of Open Source IMAP Servers Chaos Golubitsky – Carnegie Mellon University
Toward an Automated Vulnerability Comparison of Open Source IMAP Servers Chaos Golubitsky – Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT The attack surface concept provides a means of discussing the susceptibility of software to as-yet-unknown attacks. A system’s attack surface encompasses the methods the system makes available to an attacker, and the system resources which can be used to further an attack. A measurement of the size of the attack surface could be used to compare the security of multiple systems which perform the same function. The Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) has been in existence for over a decade. Relative to HTTP or SMTP, IMAP is a niche protocol, but IMAP servers are widely deployed nonetheless. There are three popular open source UNIX IMAP servers – UW-IMAP, Cyrus, and Courier-IMAP – and there has not been a formal security comparison between them. In this paper, I use attack surfaces to compare the relative security risks posed by these three products. I undertake this evaluation in service of two complementary goals: to provide an honest examination of the security postures and risks of the three servers, and to advance the study of attack surfaces by performing an automated attack surface measurement using a methodology based on counting entry and exit points in the code. Introduction Contributions and Roadmap System administrators frequently confront the The paper makes two major contributions. First, problem of selecting a software package to perform a I undertake an in-depth discussion of the relative secu- desired function. Many considerations affect this deci- rity postures of the three major open source IMAP sion, including functionality, ease of installation, soft- servers in use today. -
How-To Gnome-Look Guide
HHOOWW--TTOO Written by David D Lowe GGNNOOMMEE--LLOOOOKK GGUUIIDDEE hen I first joined the harddisk, say, ~/Pictures/Wallpapers. right-clicking on your desktop Ubuntu community, I and selecting the appropriate You may have noticed that gnome- button (you know which one!). Wwas extremely look.org separates wallpapers into impressed with the amount of different categories, according to the customization Ubuntu had to size of the wallpaper in pixels. For Don't let acronyms intimidate offer. People posted impressive the best quality, you want this to you; you don't have to know screenshots, and mentioned the match your screen resolution. If you what the letters stand for to themes they were using. They don't know what your screen know what it is. Basically, GTK is soon led me to gnome-look.org, resolution is, click System > the system GNOME uses to the number one place for GNOME Preferences > Screen Resolution. display things like buttons and visual customization. The However, Ubuntu stretches controls. GNOME is Ubuntu's screenshots there looked just as wallpapers quite nicely if you picked default desktop environment. I impressive, but I was very the wrong size, so you needn't fret will only be dealing with GNOME confused as to what the headings about it. on the sidebar meant, and I had customization here--sorry no idea how to use the files I SVG is a special image format that Kubuntu and Xubuntu folks! downloaded. Hopefully, this guide doesn't use pixels; it uses shapes Gnome-look.org distinguishes will help you learn what I found called vectors, which means you can between two versions of GTK: out the slow way. -
Downloadable Email Program for My Pc 32 Best Free Email Clients
downloadable email program for my pc 32 Best Free Email Clients. Here are 32 best free email client software . These let you manage and access all of your email accounts in one single place easily. All these email client software are completely free and can be downloaded to Windows PC. These free software offer various features, like: can be used with IMAP, SMTP, POP3 and Gmail, keeps your emails safe and secure, lets you open various emails simultaneously, provide protection from spam, lets you view your emails offline, manage and access all of your email accounts in one single place, supports PH, LDAP, IMAP4, POP3 and SMPT mail protocols etc. So, go through this list of free email client software and see which ones you like the most. Thunderbird. Thunderbird is a free and handy email client software for your computer. It can be used with IMAP, SMTP, POP3 and Gmail. It will also work with email accounts provided by MS Exchange Server. The user interface of Thunderbird is tabbed. It lets you open various emails simultaneously. Thunderbird keeps your emails safe and secure. It also has special filters for filtering the mail. Windows Live Mail. Windows Live Mail is a free email client for your computer. It works with various email accounts. It lets you access Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail and emails from different servers which supports POP3 and SMTP. Its security features are excellent it will also provide protection from spam. You can also view your emails offline in this freeware. Zimbra Desktop. Zimbra Desktop is a free email client. -
A Simplified Graphics System Based on Direct Rendering Manager System
J. lnf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 16(2): 125-129, Jun. 2018 Regular paper A Simplified Graphics System Based on Direct Rendering Manager System Nakhoon Baek* , Member, KIICE School of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea Abstract In the field of computer graphics, rendering speed is one of the most important factors. Contemporary rendering is performed using 3D graphics systems with windowing system support. Since typical graphics systems, including OpenGL and the DirectX library, focus on the variety of graphics rendering features, the rendering process itself consists of many complicated operations. In contrast, early computer systems used direct manipulation of computer graphics hardware, and achieved simple and efficient graphics handling operations. We suggest an alternative method of accelerated 2D and 3D graphics output, based on directly accessing modern GPU hardware using the direct rendering manager (DRM) system. On the basis of this DRM support, we exchange the graphics instructions and graphics data directly, and achieve better performance than full 3D graphics systems. We present a prototype system for providing a set of simple 2D and 3D graphics primitives. Experimental results and their screen shots are included. Index Terms: Direct rendering manager, Efficient handling, Graphics acceleration, Light-weight implementation, Prototype system I. INTRODUCTION Rendering speed is one of the most important factors for 3D graphics application programs. Typical present-day graph- After graphics output devices became publicly available, a ics programs need to be able to handle very large quantities large number of graphics applications were developed for a of graphics data. The larger the data size, and the more sen- broad spectrum of uses including computer animations, com- sitive to the rendering speed, the better the speed-up that can puter games, user experiences, and human-computer inter- be achieved, even for minor aspects of the graphics pipeline. -
Persistent E-Mail Identification Is Viable!
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives (SDA 2014) Persistent e-mail identification is viable! Stefan Haun and Andreas N¨urnberger Data and Knowledge Engineering Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany http://www.dke.ovgu.de Abstract. Persistent identification of entities in Personal Information Management (PIM) is necessary to enable stable, long-term references in archives and semantic applications. In the case of e-mails, the standard offers Message-IDs (MID), which are widely deployed. However, stores do not use the MID but rather rely on a path, which is likely to change, to refer to e-mails and thus do not offer a stable identification. We show that MIDs are viable to identify and retrieve e-mails from an IMAP store in real-world scenarios. The presented concept can be integrated into any store, but we also offer a software solution that serves as an additional layer above the store and allows real-time access over MID. We propose a validation method to prove that the concept is working and some applications that are enabled by e-mail identification are sketched. 1 Introduction Sending e-mails has long replaced traditional letters, especially in the business and research context. Being digital, e-mails can be easily stored and accessed from different locations, building up large archives as part of the personal infor- mation managed by each user. Although a central element of communication, e-mails are still tied to special software, the Mail User Agent, instead of being integrated into the overall workflow. -
Mozilla: a Users Guide
Mozilla: A Users Guide. or Using the Mozilla Application Suite Kevin T. Neely October 17, 2003 Contents 1 Installation 15 1.1 Deciding which Mozilla to Run ........................ 15 1.1.1 Platform ................................. 15 1.1.2 Version .................................. 15 1.2 Installing Mozilla ................................ 16 1.2.1 Using an Installer Package ....................... 16 1.2.2 Manual Installation ........................... 17 1.3 Upgrading .................................... 19 1.3.1 Make a Backup ............................. 19 1.3.2 Uninstall ................................. 19 1.3.3 Install Mozilla .............................. 20 1.3.4 Retrieve Missing Files ......................... 20 1.4 Running Multiple versions of Mozilla ..................... 21 2 Getting Started and Mozilla Basics 23 2.1 Starting Mozilla ................................. 23 2.2 Exiting Mozilla ................................. 23 2.2.1 QuickLaunch .............................. 23 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS 2.3 Preferences ................................... 24 2.4 Advanced Settings ............................... 24 2.4.1 prefs.js .................................. 25 2.4.2 user.js .................................. 25 2.4.3 userContent.css ............................. 26 2.5 Profiles ...................................... 27 2.6 Themes ..................................... 27 2.7 Security ..................................... 27 2.7.1 Passwords ................................ 27 2.8 Cookies .................................... -
Linux Graphics Meets the ARM Ecosystem
Linux Graphics Meets the ARM Ecosystem Jesse Barker <[email protected]> April 12, 2011 Find us here on the Linaro wiki Overview ● The Linux Desktop ● The ARM Linux Desktop ● The Subset Approach ● Examples ● Questions ● What's Next The Desktop Window system ● Display management ● Resource management ● Session management ● Event handling ● Application programming interface Protocol Decode Device Independent X (DIX) DRI EXA DDX User space libdrm evdev DRM KMS Kernel GEM/TTM space Input H/W CPU GPU DC Memory Protocol Encode DRI GLX libdrm libX* Core Application Logic User space DRM KMS Kernel GEM/TTM space GPU DC CPU Memory Toolkits/Frameworks ● Create abstraction layer from the underlying window system. ● Provide uniform look-and-feel across platforms. ● Applications don't have to care which system they are running on. ● New backend to the framework adds a new supported platform for a whole bundle of applications. Bells and Whistles ● OpenGL ● Video ● Audio ● Compositing window managers ● Animation The ARM Desktop What's the difference? ● Most differences are “physical” ● Screen size and resolution ● Unified memory pool ● Power vs. raw performance ● Some API (not necessarily, though) ● Window system interfaces ● Rendering interfaces The Subset Approach ● OpenGL ES 2.0 is explicitly defined as a subset of OpenGL 2.1. ● Both have diverged since the original definition. ● Minimize specialized code (e.g., window system interfaces). The “big-ticket” items ● Immediate mode ● Fixed-function vertex processing ● Fixed-function fragment processing ● EGL vs. GLX Examples ● glmark2 ● cairo-gles ● compiz glmark2 ● Based upon opensource glmark by Ben Smith. ● Uses 3D Studio Max for model content. ● Uses SDL for window system abstraction. -
Beyond Eye Candy
COVER STORY Xgl and Compiz An OpenGL-accelerated desktop with Xgl and Compiz BEYOND EYE CANDY www.sxc.hu A member of Suse’s X11 team delivers an insider’s look at Xgl. agement must work hand in hand, we can expect to see more compositing BY MATTHIAS HOPF window managers in the future with the ability to merge both processes. ac fans were ecstatic when The Render extension adds new basic Another important X server compo- Apple introduced the Quartz primitives for displaying images and nent that desperately needs reworking is MExtreme [1] graphics interface, polygons, along with a new glyph sys- the hardware acceleration architecture, which accelerated desktop effects using tem for enhanced font displays. This which is responsible for efficient hard- 3D hardware. Microsoft’s Windows Vista particularly reflects the fact that the leg- ware representation of graphic com- with its Aero technology looks to close acy graphics commands, called core re- mands. The previous XAA architecture is this gap with the Mac. In the world of quests, no longer meet the demands built around core requests, and is there- Linux, Xgl [2] now provides a compara- placed on modern toolkits such as Qt fore difficult to extend. The architecture ble and even more advanced technology and GTK. All primitives can now be outlived its usefulness and needs replac- that supports similar effects. linked to data in the framebuffer using ing. The most promising alternatives are Xgl is an X Server by David Revemann Porter-Duff operators [3], thus support- EXA and OpenGL. that uses OpenGL to implement graphics ing the rendering of semitransparent sur- EXA is straightforward and easy to im- output. -
BCM 4.0 Unified Messaging Configuration Guide
BCM 4.0 Unified Messaging Configuration Guide Business Communications Manager BCM 4.0 Document Status:Beta Document Version: 1.0 Part Code: N0060611 Date: January 2006 Copyright © Nortel Networks Limited 2006 All rights reserved. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. The statements, configurations, technical data, and recommendations in this document are believed to be accurate and reliable, but are presented without express or implied warranty. Users must take full responsibility for their applications of any products specified in this document. The information in this document is proprietary to Nortel Networks. Trademarks *Nortel, Nortel (Logo), the Globemark, and This is the way, This is Nortel (Design mark) are trademarks of Nortel Networks. *Microsoft, MS, MS-DOS, Windows, and Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Citrix is a registered trademark of Citrix Systems, Inc. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Revision history 3 Revision history July 2005 Draft document submitted for external technical review. Review comments received and incorporated. January 2006 Beta document submitted. BCM 4.0 Unified Messaging Configuration Guide 4 Revision history N0060611 5 Task List Getting started . 9 Configuring your system for Unified Messaging . 15 To check that Business Communications Manager is not configured to use DNS........17 To check that a Host Name is entered on the Business Communications Manager.....17 To configure access