Gastro for Psychs 2018.2 [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gastro for Psychs 2018.2 [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode] Gastroenterology/Hepatology An update for the Psychiatrists John Perry North Shore Hospital Auckland, NZ Outline Interpreting liver function tests Common liver conditions Psychotropic medications and the liver Hepatitis C New treatment options and how it affects you Gut stuff Deciphering Liver Tests Pattern recognition!!! What kind of doctor? Deciphering Liver Tests LFTs Other important tests Bilirubin Albumin ALP FBC GGT MCV Platelets ALT PT/INR AST Imaging Liver Function Tests: How to crack the code Bilirubin Isolated rises usually not important Gilbert’s syndrome Haemolysis? Haptoglobins, Combe’s test, Reticulocyte count When raised with other enzymes may suggest significant liver disease Cholestasis Acute hepatitis Drug induced liver injury Liver Function Tests: How to crack the code ALP + GGT Classically “obstructive” enzymes Together rise with intra and extra-hepatic cholestasis, with increased bilirubin ALP alone often from bones GGT alone not usually significant EtOH, Fatty liver, Meds Liver Function Tests: How to crack the code ALT/AST Classically the “Hepatitic” enzymes Most labs only do ALT unless asked Small rises common Fatty liver Infections Viral hepatitis Multiple esoteric causes! High levels = potentially sick Acute hepatitis Paracetamol overdose Drug induced liver injury (DILI) Other important tests Albumin Drops in chronic liver disease (also many other causes) PT/INR Rises in significant liver dysfunction MCV High with alcohol dependence, some meds Platelets Low in alcoholics, low with portal hypertension Hepatitic Bili 28 (<20) ALP 119 GGT 60 (<50) ALT 290 (<45) AST 216 (<45) Albumin 35 N PT/INR 1.1 (0.9-1.1) Platelets 320 N Cholestatic Bili 29 (<20) ALP 560 GGT 492 (<50) ALT 41 (<45) Albumin 35 N PT/INR 1.0 N Platelets 320 N Colestatic LFTS need an ultrasound. Obstruction Liver lesions (cancer?) Mixed pattern Bili 259 (<20) …and pretty sick! ALP 1119 GGT 1303 (<50) ALT 2458 (<45) AST 2621 (<45) Albumin 31 (>34) PT/INR 4 (0.9-1.1) Platelets 490 (150 -390) Some Common Diagnoses Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) = Fatty liver, sometimes NASH (Gilbert ’s syndrome) Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) Hepatitis B and C Drug-induced liver dysfunction Auto-immune liver diseases (AIH/PBC/PSC) Drug-induced liver injury Many others… NAFLD ALD Hep B Hep C Drug-induced 46 yr old man Others BMI 36 Bili 12 (<20) ALP 110 Minimal alcohol GGT 80 (<50) ALT 57 (<45) Comorbidities: Albumin 38 N Depression PT/INR 1.0 N Hypertension Platelets 276 N Dyslipidaemia Most likely diagnosis? Fatty liver (NAFLD) NAFLD ALD Hep B Hep C Drug-induced 46 yr old Tongan man Others BMI 36 Bili 12 (<20) ALP 110 Minimal alcohol GGT 80 (<50) ALT 57 (<45) Comorbidities: Albumin 38 N Depression PT/INR 1.0 N Hypertension Platelets 276 N Dyslipidaemia Most likely diagnosis? Hepatitis B or Fatty liver NAFLD ALD Hep B Hep C Drug-induced 46 yr old ex-IVDU Others BMI 36 Bili 12 (<20) ALP 110 Minimal alcohol GGT 80 (<50) ALT 57 (<45) Comorbidities: Albumin 38 N Depression PT/INR 1.0 N Hypertension Platelets 276 N Dyslipidaemia Most likely diagnosis? Hepatitis C Pattern Recognition Mild ALT rise = wide differential Clinical context helps In reality, we screen for most things Hep B/C Ferritin Immunoglobulins, auto-antibodies Thyroid function Coeliac screen Alpha-1 antitripsin Ceruloplasmin + serum copper A large patient + negative screen = NAFLD Fatty Liver/NAFLD/NASH NAFLD = non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Fatty liver, no inflammation 30 – 40% of some Western populations! Good prognosis NASH = non -alcoholic steatohepatitis Fatty liver, inflammation, fibrosis/damage occurring About 5% of fatty liver patients May lead to cirrhosis or liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma Risk factors for progression Hypertension Raised cholesterol Metabolic syndrome Diabetes ALT > 2x ULN Management of NAFLD/NASH Those with risk factors or ALT >100 get referred to clinic Fibroscan is inaccurate Ok if normal, but raised reading may be false positive Losing weight/exercise is the mainstay of therapy So far only bariatric surgery alters outcome Small study showing benefit for rosiglitazone Hepatitis B for the Psychiatrist DNA virus Inserts into your genome 200 Million chronically infected worldwide Vertical transmission mother to child 30 – 90% likely Horizonal infection in children in endemic areas Chronic infection can lead to cirrhosis, liver cancer, death Excellent vaccination available – transmission can be prevented! Consider in Maori, Polynesian, Aborigine, Asian, East European, African Hepatitis B for the Psychiatrist Percentage of chronic HBV infection: < 2% –– Low 22––7%7% –– Intermediate > 8% –– High Margolis et al. 1991 Hepatitis B for the Psychiatrist Important tests: HbSAg (Hep B surface antigen) = infected HbSAb = immune ALT HBV DNA (only request if HbSAg +ve and ALT is raised) The bottom line: HbSAg +ve + raised ALT + HBV DNA>2000 IU/mL = refer for treatment Also refer if evidence of cirrhosis, or family Hx of Hepatoma (HCC) Hepatitis B for the Psychiatrist Treatment of Hepatitis B Suppress the virus with oral medication Entecavir Tenofovir Highly effective Duration of treatment may be many years We’re working on a cure… NAFLD ALD Hep B Hep C Drug-induced 56 yr old man Others Not particularly overweight Bili 26 (<20) Previous alcohol dependence ALP 103 Nil reported now GGT 591 (<50) ALT 53 (<45) Bipolar affective disorder AST 124 (<45) Takes lithium, quetiapine Albumin 32 (>34) Likely diagnosis? PT/INR 1.1 (0.9-1.1) Platelets 102 (150 -390) MCV 106 (81 – 98) Ferritin 1100 (20 – 350) Saturation 39% Alcoholic Liver Disease Alcohol causes a broad spectrum of disease: Fatty liver - Alcoholic hepatitis – Cirrhosis Normal liver Fatty liver Alcoholic Cirrhosis Hepatitis McCullough, AJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:2023 Alcoholic Liver Disease Alcohol causes a broad spectrum of disease: Fatty liver - Alcoholic hepatitis – Cirrhosis 90 to 100% Normal liver Fatty liver 10 to 35% 8 to 20% Alcoholic Cirrhosis HCC Hepatitis 40% ? 4% per year McCullough, AJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:2023 Alcoholic Liver Disease Management Encourage abstinence/safe drinking Thiamine Refer if significant liver disease Medications Disulfiram (Antabuse) Naltrexone Baclofen Which patients may have cirrhosis? Bili 26 (<20) Look for ALP 103 low albumin GGT 591 (<50) Raised PT/INR ALT 53 (<45) Low platelets AST 124 (<45) Consider: Albumin 32 (>34) Fibroscan PT/INR 1.1 (0.9-1.1) Imaging, usually U/S Platelets 102 (150 -390) Nodular liver MCV 106 (81 – 98) Portal HT Ferritin 1100 (20 – 350) Saturation 39% Refer all cirrhotic patients for assessment Surveillance in cirrhotic patients 2 – 4% annual incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Curable if found early Palliative if not Ultrasound and AFP 6 monthly Improves survival Also screen for varices, 3 yearly What medications are safe with cirrhosis? Severity: Cirrhosis = just scarring. Can have most medications safely! Cirrhosis + Portal Hypertension. Caution but usually ok. Decompensated cirrhosis – beware. Low albumin Raised bilirubin Raised INR Ascites Encephalopathy Risk of precipitating encephalopathy (eg by constipation) Analgesia Paracetamol is the safest analgesic! 3 gm per day limit is safe. Opioids lead to constipation – can be bad. NSAIDs a problem for kidneys and risk of bleeding Methadone safest opiate Transient Elastography (Fibroscan) Transient Elastography (Fibroscan) Ultrasound transducer Mild amplitude, 50 Hz Elastic sheer wave Velocity correlates with stiffness, fibrosis. 5 – 10 mins, starved 3 hrs Transient Elastography (Fibroscan) Result affected by In practice High ALT Liver biopsy avoided in most Ascites Still needed for diagnostic work Obesity Psychotropic medications and the liver Drug Induced Liver Injury: anti-psychotic agents More common with conventional antipsychotic agents: Clorpromazine Less frequently with other phenothiazines Cholestatic hepatitis 2 – 4 weeks after starting Newer agents (atypical) are low risk Some linked with rises in LFTs Clinically apparent liver injury with jaundice exceedingly rare. Clozapine Main risk is agranulocytosis Transient rises in ALT/AST common Usually resolve in 6 – 12 weeks Sometimes require dose reduction Significant liver injury very rare 1 in 2000 patients 30 yr old Maori man. Chronic schizophrenia on clozapine 30 yr old Maori man. Chronic schizophrenia on clozapine Hb 110 Bili 40 WCC 14.9 ALP 86 Neut 11.8 GGT 162 Eos 0.0 AST 4880 Plts 253 ALT 2444 INR 1.8 Na 138 Alb 48 K 3.9 Cr 98 Blood gas: pH 7.406, CRP 105 pO2 8.17 pCO2 5.28 Trop 0.13 HCO3 24 Further investigations No other toxic drugs, no paracetamol Morbidly obese, on CPAP Clozapine level 4370 (toxicity increased if >1000) Echo – dilated cardiomyopathy LFTs trend 6000 5000 4000 U/L 3000 2000 1000 0 AST/ALT trends 20/03/2008 25/04/2008 26/04/2008 27/04/2008 28/04/2008 29/04/2008 29/04/2008 30/04/2008 1/05/2008 2/05/2008 3/05/2008 5/05/2008 date ast 8/05/2008 16/05/2008 alt 19/05/2008 21/05/2008 22/05/2008 6/06/2008 10/06/2008 25/06/2008 3/07/2008 The conclusion? Clozapine-induced cardiomyopathy? Congestive +/- ischaemic hepatitis? Clozapine -induced hepatitis? Clozapine overdose or just decreased hepatic clearance? Most of the above… Other atypical antipsychotics Olanzapine Frequent (10 – 50%) mild rises in ALT, transient Long
Recommended publications
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Constipation Ian M. Paquette, M.D. • Madhulika Varma, M.D. • Charles Ternent, M.D. Genevieve Melton-Meaux, M.D. • Janice F. Rafferty, M.D. • Daniel Feingold, M.D. Scott R. Steele, M.D. he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons for functional constipation include at least 2 of the fol- is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care lowing symptoms during ≥25% of defecations: straining, Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, relying on anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- manual maneuvers to promote defecation, and having less posed of Society members who are chosen because they than 3 unassisted bowel movements per week.7,8 These cri- XXX have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and teria include constipation related to the 3 common sub- rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead inter- types: colonic inertia or slow transit constipation, normal national efforts in defining quality care for conditions re- transit constipation, and pelvic floor or defecation dys- lated to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied function. However, in reality, many patients demonstrate by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the symptoms attributable to more than 1 constipation sub- best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and type and to constipation-predominant IBS, as well. The not prescriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • بنام خدا Defecography
    1/15/2019 بنام خدا Defecography 1 1/15/2019 Overview: • Definition • Anatomy • Method of assessment • Indication • Preparation • Instrument • Contrast media • Technique • Recording • Other technique • Technique pitfalls • Parameters • Abnormalities Findings Definition: Dynamic rectal examination (DRE) or defecography or proctography. • DRE provides a dynamic assessment of the act of defecation by recording the rectal expulsion of a barium paste. • DRE provides qualitative and quantitative information on the function of anorectal and pelvic floor function, and the effectiveness of the anal sphincter and rectal evacuation. 2 1/15/2019 Anatomy 3 1/15/2019 4 1/15/2019 5 1/15/2019 Method of assessment • Barium enema • Colon transit time • MR defecography Indications for dynamic rectal examination are: 1. Outlet obstruction (disorder of defecatory or rectal evacuation), caused by intussusception, enterocele or spastic pelvic floor syndrome. 2. To distinguish between anterior rectocele and enterocele. 3. Fecal incontinence combined with outlet obstruction in intra-anal intussusception. 6 1/15/2019 Preparation • No bowel preparation was used • It was deemed more physiological to observe how anorectal morphology altered during defaecation without preparation. • Two hours prior to the examination the patient ingests 135 ml of liquid barium contrast to opacify the small bowel. • In females the vagina is coated with 30 ml amidotrizoic acid 50% solution gel. • The use of tampons and gauzes soaked in barium should be avoided, because they can impaire pelvic-function. LEFT: Pathology is suspected because of a great distance between rectum and vagina. No oral contrast had been given. RIGHT: After ingestion of liquid barium contrast a large enterocele is seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Rectal Prolapse: an Overview of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Patient-Specific Management Strategies
    J Gastrointest Surg (2014) 18:1059–1069 DOI 10.1007/s11605-013-2427-7 EVIDENCE-BASED CURRENT SURGICAL PRACTICE Rectal Prolapse: An Overview of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Patient-Specific Management Strategies Liliana Bordeianou & Caitlin W. Hicks & Andreas M. Kaiser & Karim Alavi & Ranjan Sudan & Paul E. Wise Received: 11 November 2013 /Accepted: 27 November 2013 /Published online: 19 December 2013 # 2013 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract Abstract Rectal prolapse can present in a variety of forms and is associated with a range of symptoms including pain, incomplete evacuation, bloody and/or mucous rectal discharge, and fecal incontinence or constipation. Complete external rectal prolapse is characterized by a circumferential, full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus, which may be intermittent or may be incarcerated and poses a risk of strangulation. There are multiple surgical options to treat rectal prolapse, and thus care should be taken to understand each patient’s symptoms, bowel habits, anatomy, and pre-operative expectations. Preoperative workup includes physical exam, colonoscopy, anoscopy, and, in some patients, anal manometry and defecography. With this information, a tailored surgical approach (abdominal versus perineal, minimally invasive versus open) and technique (posterior versus ventral rectopexy +/− sigmoidectomy, for example) can then be chosen. We propose an algorithm based on available outcomes data in the literature, an understanding of anorectal physiology, and expert opinion that can serve as a guide to determining the rectal prolapse operation that will achieve the best possible postoperative outcomes for individual patients. Keywords Rectal prolapse . Management . Surgery . ’ . Liliana Bordeianou and Caitlin W. Hicks are co-first authors.
    [Show full text]
  • GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY DISORDERS, DIAGNOSIS and TREATMENT Policy Number: GAS014 Effective Date: February 1, 2019
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY DISORDERS, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Policy Number: GAS014 Effective Date: February 1, 2019 Table of Contents Page COVERAGE RATIONALE ............................................. 1 CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES APPLICABLE CODES ................................................. 1 (CMS) .................................................................. 14 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ...................................... 2 REFERENCES ........................................................ 14 CLINICAL EVIDENCE ................................................ 4 POLICY HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION ............... 17 U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) ......... 13 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE ........................................ 17 COVERAGE RATIONALE The following procedures are proven and medically necessary: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) therapy for treating refractory diabetic gastroparesis that has failed other therapies, or chronic intractable (drug-refractory) nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology Rectal manometry and rectal sensation, tone and compliance test Anorectal manometry Defecography for treating intractable constipation or constipation in members who have one or more of the following conditions that are suspected to be the cause of impaired defecation: o Pelvic floor dyssynergia (inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis muscle); or o Enterocele (e.g., after hysterectomy); or o Anterior rectocele
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Constipation and Homoeopathy
    CHRONIC CONSTIPATION AND HOMOEOPATHY © Dr. Rajneesh Kumar Sharma BSc, BHMS, MD (Homoeopathy), DI (Hom) London, hMD (UK) etc. Homoeo Cure & Research Institute NH 74, Moradabad Road, Kashipur (Uttaranchal) INDIA, Pin- 244713 Ph. 05947- 260327, 9897618594 [email protected], [email protected] www.homeopathictreatment.org.in, www.treatmenthomeopathy.com, www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com INTRODUCTION DEFINITION OF CHRONIC CONSTIPATION Chronic constipation (Psora) is a disorder characterized by unsatisfactory defecation (Psora) that results from infrequent stools, difficult stool passage (Psora), or both over a time period of at least 12 weeks. The diagnosis is primarily symptom-based, relying on the patient’s self-report of symptoms; however, the description of constipation symptoms varies significantly among patients. Common symptoms may include infrequent bowel movement (Psora), hard stool (Psora), too small stool (Tubercular/ Psora), difficulties with stool expulsion (excessive straining) (Tubercular/ Psora), feeling of incomplete evacuation (Psora) or simply a patient description of “a feeling of being constipated” without any of these constipation-related symptoms. SYMPTOM-BASED CRITERIA FOR CHRONIC FUNCTIONAL CONSTIPATION 1- Rome II Criteria At least 12 weeks, need not be consecutive, in past 12 months of > 2 of: • Straining in >25% of defecations (Psora) • Sensation of incomplete evacuation in >25% of defecations (Psora) • Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockade in >25% of defecations (Psora/ Psora) • Manuel maneuvers
    [Show full text]
  • Neurogenic Bowel After Spinal Cord Injury
    Bowel Dysfunction and Management Following Spinal Cord Injury Maureen Coggrave PhD, MSc, RN Patricia Mills, MHSc, MD, FRCPC Rhonda Willms, MD, FRCPC Janice J Eng, PhD (PT/OT) www.scireproject.com Version 5.0 Key Points There is limited and conflicting evidence in support of multifaceted bowel management programs for managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction. There is a need for further research to examine the optimal level of dietary fibre intake in patients with SCI. Digital rectal stimulation increases motility in the left colon in individuals with reflex neurogenic bowel dysfunction after SCI. Digital evacuation of stool is a very common intervention for bowel management after SCI, reducing duration of bowel management and fecal incontinence. There is contrasting evidence on the effectiveness of abdominal massage in treating neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Further research is needed. Electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia. Functional magnetic stimulation may reduce colonic transit time in individuals with SCI. Sacral anterior root stimulation reduces severe constipation in individuals with SCI. Transanal irrigation can improve all bowel management outcomes in individuals with chronic neurogenic bowel dysfunction following SCI. The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema is a safe and effective treatment for significant GI problems in persons with SCI when conservative and transanal irrigation are unsuccessful or inappropriate. Pulsed water transanal irrigation may help to remove stool in individuals with SCI. In very small studies prucalopride, metoclopramide, neostigmine, and fampridine have been found to improve constipation in individuals with SCI. Prucalopride is not currently available the United States but is available in Canada and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Obstructed Defecation Syndrome W26, 30 August 2011 09:00 - 12:00
    Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to obstructed defecation syndrome W26, 30 August 2011 09:00 - 12:00 Start End Topic Speakers 09:00 09:05 Introduction Giulio Aniello Santoro 09:05 09:20 Anatomy of the pelvic floor and the posterior S. Abbas Shobeiri compartment 09:20 09:35 Pathophysiology of obstructed defecation syndrome Anders Mellgren 09:35 09:50 Ultrasonographic imaging in obstructed defecation Giulio Aniello Santoro syndrome 09:50 10:10 Defecography and dynamic MRI Andrzej Pawel Wieczorek 10:10 10:30 Discussion All 10:30 11:00 Break None 11:00 11:15 Anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic tests Giulio Aniello Santoro 11:15 11:30 Management of obstructed defecation syndrome Anders Mellgren 11:30 11:45 Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation and Biofeedback Julie Herbert 11:45 12:00 Questions All Aims of course/workshop Ostructed defecation syndrome (ODS)can be due to different reasons (rectocele, enterocele, rectal prolapse, intussusception, pelvic floor dyssynergy). Management of ODS depends on a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy and function of the anorectal region. Aims of this workshop are to provide participants the basic knowledge on: 1) the normal anatomy of the anorectum, 2) the diagnostic procedures including imaging techniques, manometric and neurophysiologic tests and 3) the main guidelines and indications for the treatment of ODS. Educational Objectives Highly regarded speakers of different specialties, including colorectal surgeons, radiologist and urogynecologist have been selected to provide their experiences on how to approach, from a practical point of view, patients with ostructed defecation syndrome Anatomy of the pelvic floor and the posterior compartment The pelvic organs rely on their connective tissue attachments to the pelvic walls and support from the levator ani muscles that are under neuronal control from the peripheral and central nervous systems.
    [Show full text]
  • STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ Device for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: One-Year Real-World Outcomes of the European TRANSTAR Registry
    Int J Colorectal Dis DOI 10.1007/s00384-014-1836-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry G. Ribaric & A. D’Hoore & G. Schiffhorst & E. Hempel & The TRANSTAR Registry Study Group Accepted: 31 January 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Methods From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive Purpose Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in pa- patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colo- tients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited rectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical out- scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) comes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ score, ODS score, St. Mark’s score, Euro Quality of Life-5 device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Con- postoperatively. stipation—Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as The TRANSTAR Registry Study Group: K. Frommhold1, H. Schimmelpfennig2,M.Konrad3, H. Müller-Lobeck4, G. Aumann G5, M. El-Din6,R.Manger7, J. Kirchner8,T.Deska9,R. Scherer10,G.Ferulano11,I.Corsale12,F.Pigot13, JJ. Tuech14,R.Villet15, P.A. Lehur16,K.Wolff17,F.delaPortilla18, M. Alcántara Moral19,A. D’Hoore20, M. Abrahamowicz21,J.P.DaCosta22. 1Klinikum Bochum; Germany, 2Klinik Neustadt; Germany, 3Klinikum Neustadt; Germany, 4Alice Hospital Darmstadt; Germany, 5Klinikum Augsburg; Germany, 6Oder-Spree Krankenhaus, Beeskow; Germany, 7Wertachklinik, Schwabmünchen; Germany, 8Diakoniekrankenhaus, Rotenburg/Wümme; Germany, 9Marien-Hospital, Witten; Germany, 10Krankenhaus Waldfrieden, Berlin; Germany, 11A.O.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
    icine- O Rashid and Khuroo, Intern Med 2014, S1 ed pe M n l A a c DOI: 10.4172/2165-8048.S1-005 n c r e e s t s n I Internal Medicine: Open Access ISSN: 2165-8048 Review Article Open Access Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: A Treatise on Its Functional Variant Arshad Rashid1* and Suhail Khuroo2 1Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, MMIMSR, Mullana - 133207, India 2Clinical Fellow, Surgical Gastroenetrology, KEM Hospital, Mumbai - 400012, India Abstract Obstructed defecation occurs in a major portion of patients suffering from chronic constipation. Constipation caused by obstructed defecation is of two basic types: functional and mechanical. Repeated stretching of pelvic floor musculature and nerves due to childbirth, problems with rectal sensory perception and psychological factors has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obstructed defecation syndrome. Biofeedback is the backbone of therapy of obstructed defecation. In this review, we attempt to discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of the functional variant of obstructed defecation syndrome. Keywords: Obstructed defecation syndrome; Functional; Anismus; Impaired sensorimotor function in patients with obstructed Pelvic dys-synergy; STARR; Biofeedback; Megarectum; Descending defecation might be caused by a deficit of parasympathetic sacral perineum syndrome nerves (Nervi Erigentes). It is a well-known fact that in some patients, obstructed defecation starts following pelvic surgery. Patients who have Introduction undergone rectopexy frequently experience diminished rectal sensory perception that has been attributed to the division of the “lateral Chronic constipation is a common problem that affects 2-30% of ligaments”, which contain branches of the parasympathetic sacral people in the Western World.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Constipation Induces Bladder Overactivity Associated with Upregulations of Htr2 and Trpv2 Pathways Nao Iguchi1, Alonso Carrasco Jr.2,3, Alison X
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Functional constipation induces bladder overactivity associated with upregulations of Htr2 and Trpv2 pathways Nao Iguchi1, Alonso Carrasco Jr.2,3, Alison X. Xie1, Ricardo H. Pineda1, Anna P. Malykhina1 & Duncan T. Wilcox1,2* Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is a common yet underdiagnosed paediatric entity that describes lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) accompanied by abnormal bowel patterns manifested as constipation and/or encopresis. LUTS usually manifest as urgency, urinary frequency, incontinence, and urinary tract infections (UTI). Despite increasing recognition of BBD as a risk factor for long-term urinary tract problems including recurrent UTI, vesicoureteral refux, and renal scarring, the mechanisms underlying BBD have been unclear, and treatment remains empirical. We investigated how constipation afects the lower urinary tract function using a juvenile murine model of functional constipation. Following four days of functional constipation, animals developed LUTS including urinary frequency and detrusor overactivity evaluated by awake cystometry. Physiological examination of detrusor function in vitro using isolated bladder strips, demonstrated a signifcant increase in spontaneous contractions without afecting contractile force in response to electrical feld stimulation, carbachol, and KCl. A signifcant upregulation of serotonin receptors, Htr2a and Htr2c, was observed in the bladders from mice with constipation, paralleled with augmented spontaneous contractions after pre-incubation of the bladder strips with 0.5 µM of serotonin. These results suggest that constipation induced detrusor overactivity and increased excitatory serotonin receptor activation in the urinary bladder, which contributes to the development of BBD. Functional urologic and bowel problems are common in childhood, account for up to 40% of consultations in paediatric urology, and can cause both physical and psychosocial distress for children and families1.
    [Show full text]
  • Anus, Rectumand Colon
    JOURNAL OF THE dx.doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2018-003 Anus,Rectum and Colon http://journal-arc.jp ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Rectal intussusception and external rectal prolapse are common at proctography in patients with mucus discharge Akira Tsunoda, Tomoko Takahashi, Yuma Yagi and Hiroshi Kusanagi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center Abstract: Objectives: Although various pelvic floor abnormalities are recognized to cause mucus discharge (MD), little is known about the exact distribution and frequency of diseases causing MD in evacuatory disorders. This study aimed to identify the most common diseases at evacuation proctography in patients with MD. Methods: Patients seen with symptoms of evacuatory disorder underwent proctography. Data for patients with MD who were not associated with fecal incontinence (FI) were prospectively entered into a database and analyzed retrospectively. The degree of MD was documented using FI Severity Index. Results: Sixty- two patients were included for analysis. Forty-nine (79%) had rectal intussusception (RI) or external rectal prolapse (ERP). Of those with RI, MD was observed more in patients with recto-anal intussusception (n = 22) than those with recto-rectal intussusception (n = 8). Of the 39 patients who were not associated with hemorrhoids or mucosal prolapse, 31 (79%) had RI or ERP. Meanwhile, of 582 patients who underwent proctography, 301 had RI and 96 had ERP. MD without FI was present in 13% (40/301) patients with RI and 9% (9/96) with ERP. Surgery was performed in 21 patients, and MD was cured in 20 (95%) postopera- tively. Conclusions: RI and ERP were common at proctography in patients with MD.
    [Show full text]
  • ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES 17 ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable 03/11/2021 on 3Unq4K4/tOJq29Zeu9kIOM0Jya7t9Xm5VL96Tmh5aDk02hHT8cuv7G2V8sNWYiwTTgaerSokXnENadZiZfP0quN67VMQawaT1KRUN4Fy72xBUy0g7mzCM5o3Xv7KIYUVfUImPFvm8DnjpkFl2EY8+Q== by http://journals.lww.com/ajg from Downloaded Bowel Syndrome Downloaded Brian E. Lacy, PhD, MD, FACG1, Mark Pimentel, MD, FACG2, Darren M. Brenner, MD, FACG3, William D. Chey, MD, FACG4, from 5 6 7 http://journals.lww.com/ajg Laurie A. Keefer, PhD , Millie D. Long, MDMPH, FACG (GRADE Methodologist) and Baha Moshiree, MD, MSc, FACG Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent, chronic disorder that significantly reduces patients’ quality of life. Advances in diagnostic testing and in therapeutic options for patients with IBS led to the development of this first-ever by 3Unq4K4/tOJq29Zeu9kIOM0Jya7t9Xm5VL96Tmh5aDk02hHT8cuv7G2V8sNWYiwTTgaerSokXnENadZiZfP0quN67VMQawaT1KRUN4Fy72xBUy0g7mzCM5o3Xv7KIYUVfUImPFvm8DnjpkFl2EY8+Q== American College of Gastroenterology clinical guideline for the management of IBS using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Twenty-five clinically important questions were assessed after a comprehensive literature search; 9 questions focused on diagnostic testing; 16 questions focused on therapeutic options. Consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi approach, and based on GRADE methodology, we endorse the following: We suggest that a positive diagnostic strategy as compared to a diagnostic strategy of exclusion be used to improve time to initiating appropriate therapy. We suggest that serologic testing be performed to rule out celiac disease in patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms. We suggest that fecal calprotectin be checked in patients with suspected IBS and diarrhea symptoms to rule out inflammatory bowel disease. We recommend a limited trial of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disacchardies, monosaccharides, polyols (FODMAP) diet in patients with IBS to improve global symptoms.
    [Show full text]