DOCSLIB.ORG

(ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Anorectal Dysfunction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Anorectal Dysfunction IntUrogynecolJ DOI 10.1007/s00192-016-3140-3 SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction Abdul H. Sultan1 & Ash Monga2 & Joseph Lee3 & Anton Emmanuel4 & Christine Norton5 & Giulio Santoro 6 & Tracy Hull 7 & Bary Berghmans 8 & Stuart Brody9 & Bernard T. Haylen10 Received: 15 May 2016 /Accepted: 7 June 2016 # Wiley Periodicals Inc., and The International Urogynecological Association 2016 Abstract definition. An extensive process of twenty rounds of internal and Introduction and hypothesis The terminology for anorectal external review was developed to exhaustively examine each def- dysfunction in women has long been in need of a specific inition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). clinically-based Consensus Report. Results A Terminology Report for anorectal dysfunction, Methods This Report combines the input of members of the encompassing over 130 separate definitions, has been developed. Standardization and Terminology Committees of two It is clinically based with the most common diagnoses defined. International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it inter- Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society pretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty (ICS), assisted on Committee by experts in their fields to form a groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction. Female- Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Female Anorectal specific anorectal investigations and imaging (ultrasound, radiol- Terminology. Appropriate core clinical categories and sub classi- ogy and MRI) has been included whilst appropriate figures have fications were developed to give an alphanumeric coding to each been included to supplement and help clarify the text. Interval This document is being published simultaneously in Neurourology and Urodynamics (NAU) and the International Urogynecology Journal (IUJ), the respective journals of the sponsoring organizations, the International Continence Society (ICS) and the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Standardization and Terminology Committees IUGA* &ICS# - Joseph Lee*,BernardT.Haylen*, Ash Monga#, Bary Berghmans# Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Female Anorectal Terminology - Abdul H. Sultan, Ash Monga, Joseph Lee, Anton Emmanuel, Christine Norton, Giulio Santoro, Tracy Hull, Bary Berghmans, Stuart Brody, Bernard T. Haylen Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/nau.23055. * Abdul H. Sultan 5 Kings College London, London, UK [email protected] 6 Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy 7 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA 1 Urogynaecology and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Unit, Croydon 8 Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, University Hospital, London Road, Croydon, Surrey CR7 7YE, UK Maastricht, The Netherlands 2 Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK 9 Department of General Anthropology, Charles University, 3 University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Monash Prague, Czech Republic Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 10 University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 4 University College Hospital, London, UK Australia Int Urogynecol J review (5–10 years) is anticipated to keep the document updated forming a “backbone” or “core” terminology to which more and as widely acceptable as possible. specific terminologies can be attached [7]. Conclusions A consensus-based Terminology Report for fe- This Terminology Report is inherently and appropriate- male anorectal dysfunction terminology has been produced ly a definitional document, collating the definitions of aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stim- those terms, that is, words used to express a defined con- ulus for research. cept, in a particular branch of study. Emphasis has been on comprehensively including those terms in current use Keywords Anorectal . Fecal incontinence . Female sexual in the relevant peer-reviewed literature. The aim is to as- dysfunction . Female pelvic floor . Imaging . Terminology sist clinical practice and research. Some new and revised terms have been included. Explanatory notes on defini- tions have been referred, where possible, to the Introduction “Footnotes section.” Similar to a previous report [7] the female-specific termi- The anatomical configuration of the anorectum is complex. The nology report should be as follows: mechanisms that control continence and allow defecation are multifactorial and dependent on many factors such as the con- (1) User-friendly: It should be able to be understood by all sistency of stool, bowel transit, rectal compliance and sensitiv- clinical and research users. ity, intact neurological function and integrity of the pelvic floor, (2) Clinically-based: Symptoms, signs, and validated inves- and anal sphincters. tigations should be presented for use in forming work- Historically, anorectal physiological investigations have quite able diagnoses. The first three sections will address often produced inconsistent results. Until the advent of imaging symptoms, signs, and assessment tools. The next two techniques such as endoanal ultrasound, the etiology of fecal sections will describe anorectal physiological investiga- incontinence was largely attributed to pudendal neuropathy [1]. tions and currently used pelvic imaging modalities rou- We now better understand the contribution of vaginal delivery to tinely used in the office or anorectal laboratory to make anal sphincter trauma [2]. Imaging has taught us that training in those diagnoses. A number of related radiological inves- clinical digital assessment can improve detection and repair of tigations as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obstetric anal sphincter injuries and thereby minimize the risk of have also been included. The value of electromyography developing fecal incontinence [3]. Obstructive defecation is an- and related nerve conduction, reflex latency, and sensory other common embarrassing problem and imaging techniques investigations will be outlined. that attempt to capture the defecation process are often inconclu- (3) Origin: Where a term’ s existing definition (from one sive [4]. Artificial contrast material replicating normal fecal con- of multiple sources used) is deemed appropriate, sistency for defecating proctography is not available and mag- that definition will be included and duly referenced. netic resonance imaging requires an upright scanner. A number of terms in female anorectal function and When multiple conditions such as fecal incontinence, ob- dysfunction, because of their long-term use, have structive defecation, urinary incontinence, neurological dis- now become generic, as apparent by their listing in eases, medical conditions etc. co-exist, management becomes medical dictionaries. increasingly difficult and multidisciplinary assessment becomes (4) Able to provide explanations: Where a specific explana- important [5]. As the pelvic organs (bowel, bladder, and vagina) tion is deemed appropriate to explain a change from ear- are in close proximity to each other, clinicians need to be aware lier definitions or to qualify the current definition, this of the impact of dysfunction and surgery of one organ may have will be included as an addendum to this paper (Footnote on the neighboring structures. It is therefore important for cli- [FN] 1,2,3 .. .). Wherever possible, evidence-based nicians and pelvic surgeons to have more global knowledge and medical principles will be followed. adopt a holistic approach to pelvic floor dysfunction. It is suggested that acknowledgement of these stan- There is a need for standardized terminology in female dards in written publications related to female anorectal anorectal dysfunction to accumulate accurate prevalence data, dysfunction, be indicated by a footnote to the section perform the appropriate investigations, institute management, “Methods and Materials” or its equivalent, to read as and conduct audit and research. Lack of a unified definition of follows: “Methods, definitions and units conform to the anal incontinence has resulted in variations in prevalence data standards jointly recommended by the International from epidemiological data. “Pseudo incontinence” with mu- Urogynecological Association and the International coid leakage (usually caused by organic colonic disease, die- Continence Society, except where specifically noted.” It tary sensitivity or fecal impaction) is often mistaken as fecal should be noted that the Working Group for this docu- incontinence as questionnaires do not quite differentiate them ment was formed and started generation of this document [6]. There is indeed the need for a general terminology, prior to the Rosier statement [8]. IntUrogynecolJ Symptoms (a) Fecal urgency warning time: time from first sensation of urgency to voluntary defecation or fecal incontinence. Symptom: Any morbid phenomenon or departure from the nor- (iv) Fecal (flatal) urgency incontinence [7]: Complaint of mal in structure, function, or sensation, experienced by the wom- involuntary loss of feces (gas) associated with (fecal) an and indicative of disease [9] or a health problem. Symptoms urgency. are either volunteered by, or elicited from the individual, or may (v) Tenesmus (NEW): A desire to evacuate the bowel, often be described by the individual’s caregiver [7, 10, 11]. accompanied
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fecal Incontinence/Anal Incontinence
    Fecal Incontinence/Anal Incontinence What are Fecal incontinence/ Anal Incontinence? Fecal incontinence is inability to control solid or liquid stool. Anal incontinence is the inability to control gas and mucous in addition to the inability to control stool. The symptoms range from mild release of gas to a complete loss of control. It is a common problem affecting 1 out of 13 women under the age of 60 and 1 out of 7 women over the age of 60. Men can also be have this condition. Anal incontinence is a distressing condition that can interfere with the ability to work, do daily activities and enjoy social events. Even though anal incontinence is a common condition, people are uncomfortable discussing this problem with family, friends, or doctors. They often suffer in silence, not knowing that help is available. Normal anatomy The anal sphincters and puborectalis are the primary muscles responsible for continence. There are two sphincters: the internal anal sphincter, and the external anal sphincter. The internal sphincter is responsible for 85% of the resting muscle tone and is involuntary. This means, that you do not have control over this muscle. The external sphincter is responsible for 15% of your muscle tone and is voluntary, meaning you have control over it. Squeezing the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter together closes the anal canal. Squeezing these muscles can help prevent leakage. Puborectalis Muscle Internal Sphincter External Sphincter Michigan Bowel Control Program - 1 - Causes There are many causes of anal incontinence. They include: Injury or weakness of the sphincter muscles. Injury or weakening of one of both of the sphincter muscles is the most common cause of anal incontinence.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility of the Digital Rectal Examination in the Emergency Department: a Review
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1196–1204, 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA 0736-4679/$ - see front matter http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.015 Clinical Reviews UTILITY OF THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A REVIEW Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE*† and Stephen J. Bauer, MD† *Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and †University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Reprint Address: Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown Veterans Hospital, 820 S Damen Ave., M/C 111, Chicago, IL 60612 , Abstract—Background: The digital rectal examination abdominal pain and acute appendicitis. Stool obtained by (DRE) has been reflexively performed to evaluate common DRE doesn’t seem to increase the false-positive rate of chief complaints in the Emergency Department without FOBTs, and the DRE correlated moderately well with anal knowing its true utility in diagnosis. Objective: Medical lit- manometric measurements in determining anal sphincter erature databases were searched for the most relevant arti- tone. Published by Elsevier Inc. cles pertaining to: the utility of the DRE in evaluating abdominal pain and acute appendicitis, the false-positive , Keywords—digital rectal; utility; review; Emergency rate of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) from stool obtained Department; evidence-based medicine by DRE or spontaneous passage, and the correlation be- tween DRE and anal manometry in determining anal tone. Discussion: Sixteen articles met our inclusion criteria; there INTRODUCTION were two for abdominal pain, five for appendicitis, six for anal tone, and three for fecal occult blood.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Constipation Ian M. Paquette, M.D. • Madhulika Varma, M.D. • Charles Ternent, M.D. Genevieve Melton-Meaux, M.D. • Janice F. Rafferty, M.D. • Daniel Feingold, M.D. Scott R. Steele, M.D. he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons for functional constipation include at least 2 of the fol- is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care lowing symptoms during ≥25% of defecations: straining, Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, relying on anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- manual maneuvers to promote defecation, and having less posed of Society members who are chosen because they than 3 unassisted bowel movements per week.7,8 These cri- XXX have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and teria include constipation related to the 3 common sub- rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead inter- types: colonic inertia or slow transit constipation, normal national efforts in defining quality care for conditions re- transit constipation, and pelvic floor or defecation dys- lated to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied function. However, in reality, many patients demonstrate by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the symptoms attributable to more than 1 constipation sub- best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and type and to constipation-predominant IBS, as well. The not prescriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • Anorectal Disorders Satish S
    Gastroenterology 2016;150:1430–1442 Anorectal Disorders Satish S. C. Rao,1 Adil E. Bharucha,2 Giuseppe Chiarioni,3,4 Richelle Felt-Bersma,5 Charles Knowles,6 Allison Malcolm,7 and Arnold Wald8 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; 3Division of Gastroenterology of the University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy; 4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and UNC Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 5Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6National Centre for Bowel Research and Surgical Innovation, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; 7Division of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 8Division of Gastroenterology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, questionnaires and bowel diaries are correlated,5 some pathophysiology, and management of the following com- patients may not accurately recall bowel symptoms6; hence, mon anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), func- symptom diaries may be more reliable. tional anorectal pain, and functional defecation disorders. In this report, we examine the prevalence and patho- FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal physiology of anorectal disorders, listed in Table 1,and material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI provide recommendations for diagnostic evaluation and are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. management. These supplement practice guidelines rec- ANORECTAL Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evalu- ommended by the American Gastroenterological Associa- fl ating anal and pelvic oor structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Regions Hospital Delineation of Privileges Surgery
    Regions Hospital Delineation of Privileges Surgery Applicant’s Name: ____________________________________________________________________________ Last First M. Instructions: Place a check-mark where indicated for each core group you are requesting. Review education and basic formal training requirements to make sure you meet them. Review documentation and experience requirements and be prepared to prove them. Note all renewing applicants are required to provide evidence of their current ability to perform the privileges being requested\ When documentation of cases or procedures is required, attach said case/procedure logs to this privileges-request form. Provide complete and accurate names and addresses where requested -- it will greatly assist how quickly our credentialing-specialist can process your requests. Overview: (Applicant should check all core privileges you are requesting) Core I – General Staff Privileges in Surgery Core II – General Staff Privileges in Trauma (Adult and Pediatric) Core III – Pediatric Trauma Rounding Privileges Core IV – General Staff Privileges in Burn Core V – General Staff Privileges in Colon and Rectal Surgery Core VI – General Staff Privileges in Vascular Surgery Core VII – General Staff Privileges in Surgical Critical Care Special Privileges Also included are: Core Procedure Lists Signature Page Page 1 of 24 06.2015 CORE I -- General Staff Privileges in Surgery (Appointments are based on the needs of the Department of Surgery as determined by the Division Head of Surgery and Hospital Board) Privileges Privileges include the performance of surgical procedures (including related admission, consultation, work-up, pre- and post-operative care) to correct or treat various conditions, illnesses and injuries of the: alimentary tract, including colon and rectum, abdomen and its contents, breasts, skin, and soft tissue, head and neck, endocrine system and vascular system, excluding the intercranial vessels, the heart and those vessels intrinsic and immediately adjacent thereto.
    [Show full text]
  • بنام خدا Defecography
    1/15/2019 بنام خدا Defecography 1 1/15/2019 Overview: • Definition • Anatomy • Method of assessment • Indication • Preparation • Instrument • Contrast media • Technique • Recording • Other technique • Technique pitfalls • Parameters • Abnormalities Findings Definition: Dynamic rectal examination (DRE) or defecography or proctography. • DRE provides a dynamic assessment of the act of defecation by recording the rectal expulsion of a barium paste. • DRE provides qualitative and quantitative information on the function of anorectal and pelvic floor function, and the effectiveness of the anal sphincter and rectal evacuation. 2 1/15/2019 Anatomy 3 1/15/2019 4 1/15/2019 5 1/15/2019 Method of assessment • Barium enema • Colon transit time • MR defecography Indications for dynamic rectal examination are: 1. Outlet obstruction (disorder of defecatory or rectal evacuation), caused by intussusception, enterocele or spastic pelvic floor syndrome. 2. To distinguish between anterior rectocele and enterocele. 3. Fecal incontinence combined with outlet obstruction in intra-anal intussusception. 6 1/15/2019 Preparation • No bowel preparation was used • It was deemed more physiological to observe how anorectal morphology altered during defaecation without preparation. • Two hours prior to the examination the patient ingests 135 ml of liquid barium contrast to opacify the small bowel. • In females the vagina is coated with 30 ml amidotrizoic acid 50% solution gel. • The use of tampons and gauzes soaked in barium should be avoided, because they can impaire pelvic-function. LEFT: Pathology is suspected because of a great distance between rectum and vagina. No oral contrast had been given. RIGHT: After ingestion of liquid barium contrast a large enterocele is seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Approach to Chronic Constipation in Adults NAMIRAH JAMSHED, MD; ZONE-EN LEE, MD; and KEVIN W
    Diagnostic Approach to Chronic Constipation in Adults NAMIRAH JAMSHED, MD; ZONE-EN LEE, MD; and KEVIN W. OLDEN, MD Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia Constipation is traditionally defined as three or fewer bowel movements per week. Risk factors for constipation include female sex, older age, inactivity, low caloric intake, low-fiber diet, low income, low educational level, and taking a large number of medications. Chronic constipa- tion is classified as functional (primary) or secondary. Functional constipation can be divided into normal transit, slow transit, or outlet constipation. Possible causes of secondary chronic constipation include medication use, as well as medical conditions, such as hypothyroidism or irritable bowel syndrome. Frail older patients may present with nonspecific symptoms of constipation, such as delirium, anorexia, and functional decline. The evaluation of constipa- tion includes a history and physical examination to rule out alarm signs and symptoms. These include evidence of bleeding, unintended weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, acute onset constipation in older patients, and rectal prolapse. Patients with one or more alarm signs or symptoms require prompt evaluation. Referral to a subspecialist for additional evaluation and diagnostic testing may be warranted. (Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(3):299-306. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Family Physicians.) ▲ Patient information: onstipation is one of the most of 1,028 young adults, 52 percent defined A patient education common chronic gastrointes- constipation as straining, 44 percent as hard handout on constipation is 1,2 available at http://family tinal disorders in adults. In a stools, 32 percent as infrequent stools, and doctor.org/037.xml.
    [Show full text]
  • Overlap in Patient with Functional Dyspepsia and Unspecified Functional Anorectal Pain
    Acta Interna The Journal of Internal Medicine Vol. 6 No. 2 December 2016 Website Journal : http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jain Overlap in Patient with Functional Dyspepsia and Unspecified Functional Anorectal Pain Suharjo Broto Cahyono,1 Putut Bayupurnama,2 Neneng Ratnasari,2 Siti Nurdjanah2 1Department of Internal Medicine, Charitas Hospital, Palembang 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University-Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta ABSTRAK Gangguan gastrointestinal fungsional (GGIF) mewakili gangguan yang sering dijumpai dan perlu mendapatkan perhatian dalam bidang gastroenterologi. Gangguan ini menyebabkan kecemasan, distress dan morbiditas. Pasien dengan gangguan ini sering memperlihatkan manifestasi klinis secara tumpang tindih. Pasien dispepsia fungsional seringkali tumang tindih dengan gangguan gastrointestinal lain, termasuk nyeri anorektal fungsional. Keadaan tumpang tindih ini dapat menimbulkan keluhan yang makin berat, kualitas hidup yang lebih buruk dan skor somatisasi yang lebih tinggi, dan pasien mengalami kecemasan, depresi atau insomnia lebih sering dibandingkan pasien yang tanpa problem tumpah tindih. GGIF ditegakkan berdasarkan kriteria Rome III dan eksklusi penyakit organik. Pendekatan multimodalitas dibutuhkan dalam mengatasi pasien yang menderita gangguan gastrointestinal fungsional. Pada tinjaun kasus ini, dilaporkan seorang pasien laki laki menderita gangguan dispepsia fungsional dan nyeri anorektal fungsional tidak spesifik. Kata kunci : gangguan
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article:Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence
    Basic and Clinical September, October 2019, Volume 10, Number 5 Review Article: Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Arash Sarveazad1 , Asrin Babahajian2 , Naser Amini3 , Jebreil Shamseddin4 , Mahmoud Yousefifard5* 1. Colorectal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Liver and Digestive Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. 3. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Molecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. 5. Physiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Use your device to scan and read the article online Citation: Sarveazad, A., Babahajian, A., Amini, N., Shamseddin, J., & Yousefifard, M. (2019). Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimula- tion in Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 10(5), 419-432. http:// dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.290 : http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.290 A B S T R A C T Introduction: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) in the control ofF ecal Incontinence (FI). Article info: Received: 29 Apr 2018 Methods: Two independent reviewers extensively searched in the electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web First Revision:15 May 2018 of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus for the studies published until the end of 2016. Only 28 Sep 2018 Accepted: randomized clinical trials were included.
    [Show full text]
  • Anal Cancer Anal Cancer, Also Known As Anal Carcinoma, Is Cancer of the Anus
    Anal Cancer Anal cancer, also known as anal carcinoma, is cancer of the anus. To help diagnose this condition, your doctor will perform a digital rectal exam and anoscopy. An MRI, CT, PET/CT, or an endoanal ultrasound may also be ordered by your doctor. Depending on the size, location, and extent of the cancer, treatments may include surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. What is anal cancer? Anal cancer is a cancer that begins in the anus, the opening at the end of the gastrointestinal tract through which stool, or solid waste, leaves the body. The anus begins at the bottom of the rectum, which is the last part of the large intestine (also called the colon). Anal cancer usually affects adults over age 60 and women more often than men. More than 8,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed with anal cancer each year. Anal cancer symptoms may include changes in bowel habits and changes in and around the anal area, including: bleeding and itching pain or pressure unusual discharge a lump or mass fecal incontinence fistulae. Some patients with anal cancers do not experience any symptoms. Some non-cancerous conditions, such as hemorrhoids and fissures, may cause similar symptoms. How is anal cancer diagnosed and evaluated? To diagnose the cause of symptoms, your doctor may perform: Digital rectal examination (DRE): Digital Rectal Exam (DRE): This test examines the lower rectum and the prostate gland in males to check for abnormalities in size, shape or texture. The term "digital" refers to the clinician's use of a gloved lubricated finger to conduct the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Digital Rectal Exam Reliable in Grading Anal Sphincter Defects?
    DOI: 10.1590/S0004-28032016000400006 ARQGA/1864 IS DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM RELIABLE IN GRADING ANAL SPHINCTER DEFECTS? Marcelo de Melo Andrade COURA, Silvana Marques SILVA, Romulo Medeiros de ALMEIDA, Miles Castedo FORREST and João Batista SOUSA Received 7/7/2015 Accepted 14/8/2015 ABSTRACT - Background - Anal sphincter tone is routinely assessed by digital rectal examination in patients with fecal incontinence, although its accuracy in detecting sphincter defects or separating competent from incompetent muscles has not been established. Objective - In this setting, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination in grading anal defects in order to sepa- rate small from extensive cases as depicted on 3D endoanal ultrasound, using a scoring sphincter defect and correlate anal tone to anal pressures. Methods - Women with fecal incontinence were divided into two groups: small or extensive defects according to the ultrasound scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of digital rectal examination in grading global and external sphincter defects were calculated. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was compared to resting and incremen- tal pressures. Results - A cohort of 76 consecutive incontinent women were enrolled. The median Wexner score was 9. Sixty-eight showed sphincter defects on 3D endoanal ultrasound. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was considered abnormal in 62 cases. Abnormal digital rectal examination showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 27.78% in distinguishing small from extensive defects of both sphincters. Five out of eight women with no sphincter defects had only abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination. Abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination had a sensitivity of 65.31% in distinguishing small from extensive external anal sphincter defects.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonic and Anorectal Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis
    Current Gastroenterology Reports (2019) 21: 33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-019-0699-0 LARGE INTESTINE (B CASH AND R CHOKSHI, SECTION EDITORS) Colonic and Anorectal Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis Beena Sattar1 & Reena V. Chokshi2 Published online: 8 July 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract, including the colon and anorectum. In this review, we summarize major clinical manifestations and highlight recent develop- ments in physiology, diagnostics, and treatment. Recent Findings The exact pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis is unclear and likely multifactorial. The role of the microbiome on gastrointestinal manifestations has led to a better understanding of potential pathogenic gut flora. Carbohydrate malabsorption is common. Evaluation using fecal calprotectin and high-resolution anorectal manometry may broaden our understanding of the etiologies of diarrhea and fecal incontinence and help with early recognition of pathology. Prucalopride, a high-affinity 5HT4 agonist, and pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, may help improve colonic transit in patients with constipation. Intravenous immunoglobulins have been used to target muscarinic receptor antibodies that are believed to contribute to gastrointestinal dysmotility. Summary Colonic and anorectal manifestations of systemic sclerosis include constipation, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence, and can diminish quality of life for these patients. Recent studies regarding pathophysiology as well as diagnostic and treatment options are promising. Further targeted studies to facilitate early intervention and better management of refractory symptoms are still needed. Keywords Constipation . Diarrhea . Fecal incontinence . Anorectal . Scleroderma . Systemic sclerosis Introduction frequently involved, followed by the anorectum and small bowel.
    [Show full text]