Hysan Development (0014.HK): FY18 Results in Line with Expectations; Look for Stable Retail and Positive Office Operations Going

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hysan Development (0014.HK): FY18 Results in Line with Expectations; Look for Stable Retail and Positive Office Operations Going 22 February 2019 | 1:36AM HKT Hysan Development (0014.HK): FY18 results in line with expectations; Look for stable retail and positive office operations going ahead Result highlight Justin Kwok, CFA +852-2978-0481 | [email protected] n FY18 recurring underlying profit was up 8% yoy to HK$2,536mn (excl. impact Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. from the one-off early surrender compensation income in 2017), amid Colin Yao +852-2978-1474 | [email protected] -0.1%/+5.7% yoy on retail/residential rental revenue, while recurring underlying Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. profit for office was up 24.2% amid the commencement of operations of Lee Garden Three (LG3). n NPI grew by 8.6% yoy to HK$3,367 mn on the back of added contributions from LG3, while NPI margins compressed by 0.8 pp yoy to 86.6% due to the ramp-up/leasing costs of LG3, inline with our forecasts. n BVPS was up 6.3% yoy to HK$71.12 on the back of positive reversions while cap rates were largely unchanged. n DPS up 5.1% yoy to HK$1.44, with a payout ratio to underlying EPS of about 59%, delivering a 3.4% yield to the last close of HK$41.75. Key takeaways from analyst briefing: n HK retail portfolio o After a 22% negative retail rental reversions in 2017, Hysan’s portfolio saw more stable performance in 2018 with largely neutral level of reversions, and its occupancy-cost-ratio (OCR) kept steady at around mid-teen level. Into 2019E, roughly one-third of the company’s retail portfolio space would be up for renewal and management expects likely another year of largely neutral level reversions as well. o While the company acknowledges the slower growth path of HK’s retail sales (its portfolio tenant sales slowed from 1H18’s +22-23% yoy to 3Q18’s +11-12% and 4Q18’s +6%), into 2019 it does not foresee a sudden collapse in retail spending. While early readings from 2019 would potentially be distorted by timing of Chinese New Year, its January tenant sales were still running at high-single-digit to double-digit percentage growth levels (of which Hysan Place at 20+% level). n Office segment o Currently, c.10% of the office space is being leased by co-working space operators (up from 6% as of 1H2018), which range from the budget to Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed by non-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S. Goldman Sachs Hysan Development (0014.HK) high end players. The company sees these operators not only bring transient traffic but also add variety of events to the portfolio. o Overall, management expects its positive rental reversions in the office segments to continue ahead. n Dividend policy: Management stated that c.60% payout ratio is the right level of payout that it hopes to keep. In addition, it expects a steady and progressive growth in absolute DPS going ahead. Investment view, valuation and risks n Given low office vacancy across the entire HK Island and record levels of spot rents, we see Hysan’s office segment (accounts for 44% of 2019E revenue) to continue to see positive rental reversions, while retail (accounts for 49% of 2019E revenue) would be largely flattish as it is working on the renewals/re-tenanting of luxury trade leases that were secured in the last upcycle. However, we think Hysan already saw some signs of recovery in its retail operations with an 8% yoy increase in footfall and 16% increase in tenant sales in 2018; this reaffirms our view that the worst period of the group’s retail operations is behind us and the forward recovery path is solid. (for more details refer to our Upgrade to Neutral note, published on Apr 25, 2018) n We see the company’s near-term focus will be to enhance its offerings in the HK retail portfolio (AEIs and tenant reshuffling) and to curate the neighborhood to attract more traffic. n We revise our EPS by up to -2.5% on the back of the result, and maintain our 12-month NAV-based target price at HK$43.00 (still based on 35% disc. to Fwd NAV). We remain Neutral rated. n Key risks o Upside: Faster-than-expected growth in tourist spending in Hong Kong. This could be due to 1) the high speed railway launched in 2H18 driving more traffic into Hong Kong, and 2) higher-than-expected rental achieved in Lee Gardens Three. o Downside: Weaker-than-expected domestic spending. This could be due to 1) lower-than-expected inbound tourists, 2) further decline in inbound tourists’ per capita spending, and 3) abrupt forex movement. 22 February 2019 2 Goldman Sachs Hysan Development (0014.HK) Exhibit 1: Hysan Dev FY18 results summary Key financials FY17 FY18 YoY Chg 2H FY17 1H FY18 2H FY18 YoY Chg HoH Chg Remarks (FY18) Gross rental income 3,548 3,890 9.6% 1,757 1,912 1,978 12.6% 3.5% Retail tenant sales saw a +16.2%yoy in 2018 (vs. HK retail sales of +8.8%yoy) Retail 1,925 1,923 -0.1% 940 962 961 2.2% -0.1% Rental reversion -0.1% yoy (2017: -2.2% yoy), occp at 98% as of Dec-18 vs. 97% as of Dec-17 Office 1,359 1,688 24.2% 687 820 868 26.3% 5.9% Rental reversion +24.2% yoy (2017: +5.2% yoy), occp at 97% as of Dec-18 vs. 96% as of Dec-17 Residential 264 279 5.7% 130 130 149 14.6% 14.6% Rental reversion +5.7% yoy (2017: -3.6% yoy), occp at 88% as of Dec-18 vs. 75% as of Dec-17 Net rental income 3,099 3,367 8.6% 1,496 1,688 1,679 12.2% -0.5% Retail 1,672 1,648 -1.4% 790 856 792 0.3% -7.5% Net rental margin was 86% in 2018, vs. 87% in 2017 Office 1,217 1,498 23.1% 607 728 770 26.9% 5.8% Net rental margin was 89% in 2018 vs. 90% in 2017 Residential 210 221 5.2% 99 104 117 18.2% 12.5% Net rental margin was 79% in 2018 vs. 80% in 2017 Other gains/losses 261.0 (16) n.a. 261 (9) (7) n.a. n.a. Other income/(expenses) (225) (210) -6.7% (131) (99) (111) -15.3% 12.1% EBITDA 3,135 3,141 0.2% 1,626 1,580 1,561 -4.0% -1.2% Opex reflect the full commencement of LG3 Depreciation (22) (17) -22.7% (10) (9) (8) -20.0% -11.1% Net finance charges (89) (144) 61.8% (52) (74) (70) 34.6% -5.4% Net debt to equity ratio up to 4.7% at Dec-18 (vs. 5.6% at Jun-18) Operating profits 3,024 2,980 -1.5% 1,564 1,497 1,483 -5.2% -0.9% Finance cost incl. cessation of interest expense capitalisation of HK$51mn Share of profit from asso. 220 288 30.9% 114 137 151 32.5% 10.2% upon LG3’s completion in 2017 Reval surplus on inv prop. 853 3,532 314.1% 1,628 1,790 1,742 NM -2.7% Cap rates remained unchanged HoH: 4.25-4.75% for office, 5.00-5.25% for retail, Profit before taxation 4,097 6,800 66.0% 3,306 3,424 3,376 2.1% -1.4% 3.75% for residential; revaluation gain reflects the generally Taxation (484) (481) -0.6% (241) (241) (240) -0.4% -0.4% positive rental outlook and completions of AEIs Minority interest 23 (286) -1343.5% (175) (170) (116) -33.7% -31.8% Recorded a MI loss of HK$286mn in FY18 Net profits 3,636 6,033 65.9% 2,890 3,013 3,020 4.5% 0.2% Underlying profit 2,491 2,536 1.8% 1,264 1,280 1,256 -0.6% -1.9% Recurring underlying profi 2,349 2,536 8.0% 1,122 1,280 1,256 11.9% -1.9% 2018 recurring underlying profit +8.0% yoy EPS, basic (HK$) 3.48 5.77 65.8% 2.76 2.88 2.89 4.4% 0.2% Underlying EPS (HK$) 2.38 2.42 1.7% 1.21 1.22 1.20 -0.7% -1.9% DPS (HK$) 1.37 1.44 5.1% 1.11 0.27 1.17 5.4% NM Full year DPS +5.1%yoy Investment properties 72,470 77,442 6.9% 72,470 75,436 77,442 6.9% 2.7% Book Value (HK$/ shr) 66.89 71.12 6.3% 66.89 68.64 71.12 6.3% 3.6% Operating metrics FY17 FY18 YoY Chg 2H FY17 1H FY18 2H FY18 YoY Chg HoH Chg Remarks (FY18) Occupancy rate Retail 97% 98% 1 pp 97% 96% 98% 1 pp 2 pp Office 96% 97% 1 pp 96% 95% 97% 1 pp 2 pp Residential 75% 88% 13 pp 75% 79% 88% 13 pp 9 pp Tenant sales yoy n.a.
Recommended publications
  • Hysan Development Company Limited • Annual Report 2001 1 a Distinctive Neighbourhood in Causeway Bay –
    ANNUAL REPORT 2001 INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE: CONTENTS FUNDAMENTALS STRENGTHENED 4 Highlights 2001 Inspired by the classic chambered nautilus, the logo of our flagship Lee Gardens reflects 5 Chairman’s Statement the notion of strong foundations. The vitality of the spiralling design symbolises our vision 16 Operating and Financial Review to move forward to a dynamic future. A spirit not only true for the Lee Gardens, 22 Principal Investment Properties but also for our entire portfolio. A distinctive neighbourhood in Causeway Bay – 24 Report of the Valuer to work, shop and enjoy. 25 Schedule of Principal Properties 26 Our People 28 Directors, Officers and Advisers 34 Corporate Governance 40 Directors’ Report 44 Auditors’ Report 45 Consolidated Income Statement 46 Consolidated Balance Sheet 48 Balance Sheet 49 Consolidated Statement of Recognised Gains and Losses 50 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 52 Notes to the Financial Statements 84 Five-Year Financial Summary 86 Notice of Annual General Meeting Inside back cover Shareholder Information With origins of some 450 million years, the spirally coiled, chambered nautilus has fascinated naturalists, mathematicians and physicists for years. Back cover Lee Gardens shopping centre Mission Hysan Development is committed to building and owning quality buildings, and being the occupier’s partner of choice in the provision of real estate accommodation and services, thereby delivering attractive and sustainable returns to shareholders. Year 2001 has been challenging, but rewarding for the Company strategically.
    [Show full text]
  • HKR International Ltd Version 1 | Bloomberg: 480 HK Equity | Reuters: 0480.HK Refer to Important Disclosures at the End of This Report
    China / Hong Kong Company Guide HKR International Ltd Version 1 | Bloomberg: 480 HK Equity | Reuters: 0480.HK Refer to important disclosures at the end of this report DBS Group Research . Equity 4 Jun 2020 BUY(Initiating Coverage) Rediscovering a hidden gem. Last Traded Price ( 2 Jun 2020):HK$3.12(HSI : 23,996) • HKRI Taikoo Hui in Shanghai is a crown jewel, supporting its Price Target 12-mth:HK$4.09 (31.1% upside) long-term share price appreciation • Low-cost land reserve in Discovery Bay, a well-regarded Analyst residential community, provides good investment returns Jeff YAU CFA,+852 36684180, [email protected] • The stock is undervalued, trading at 82% discount to our assessed current NAV Price Relative • Initiating coverage with BUY rating and TP of HK$4.09 HK$ Relative Index 3.7 209 Initiating coverage with BUY rating and target price of HK$4.09. HKR 3.5 189 International is trading at 82% discount to our appraised current 3.3 169 3.1 149 NAV, slightly wider than those for other small-to-mid cap property 2.9 129 developers. The stock is undervalued in view of its asset quality and 2.7 109 financial strength. The realisation of the value of its upmarket 2.5 89 Dec-19 Mar-20 residential developments in Hong Kong should provide upside on HKR International Ltd (LHS) Relative HSI (RHS) stock. Steadily growing contributions from HKRI Taikoo Hui in Forecasts and Valuation Shanghai and CDW Building in Hong Kong should underpin its long- FY Mar (HK$ m) 2019A 2020F 2021F 2022F term share price appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1193Rd Minutes
    Minutes of 1193rd Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 17.1.2019 Present Permanent Secretary for Development Chairperson (Planning and Lands) Ms Bernadette H.H. Linn Professor S.C. Wong Vice-chairperson Mr Lincoln L.H. Huang Mr Sunny L.K. Ho Dr F.C. Chan Mr David Y.T. Lui Dr Frankie W.C. Yeung Mr Peter K.T. Yuen Mr Philip S.L. Kan Dr Lawrence W.C. Poon Mr Wilson Y.W. Fung Dr C.H. Hau Mr Alex T.H. Lai Professor T.S. Liu Ms Sandy H.Y. Wong Mr Franklin Yu - 2 - Mr Daniel K.S. Lau Ms Lilian S.K. Law Mr K.W. Leung Professor John C.Y. Ng Chief Traffic Engineer (Hong Kong) Transport Department Mr Eddie S.K. Leung Chief Engineer (Works) Home Affairs Department Mr Martin W.C. Kwan Deputy Director of Environmental Protection (1) Environmental Protection Department Mr. Elvis W.K. Au Assistant Director (Regional 1) Lands Department Mr. Simon S.W. Wang Director of Planning Mr Raymond K.W. Lee Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Ms Jacinta K.C. Woo Absent with Apologies Mr H.W. Cheung Mr Ivan C.S. Fu Mr Stephen H.B. Yau Mr K.K. Cheung Mr Thomas O.S. Ho Dr Lawrence K.C. Li Mr Stephen L.H. Liu Miss Winnie W.M. Ng Mr Stanley T.S. Choi - 3 - Mr L.T. Kwok Dr Jeanne C.Y. Ng Professor Jonathan W.C. Wong Mr Ricky W.Y. Yu In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Ms Fiona S.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Godfathers Jadi Buku Laris.” —BANGKOK POST
    pustaka-indo.blogspot.com “Studwell menyajikan banyak informasi tentang proyek bisnis para godfather, juga kehidupan seks mereka. … Perkara seks ini membuat Asian Godfathers jadi buku laris.” —BANGKOK POST “Para godfather… benar-benar seperti parasit. Mereka memperoleh monopoli akses yang menguntungkan melalui guanxi beserta kroni-kroni politiknya.” —JOHN D. VAN FLEET, SHANGHAI “Reportase yang utuh dengan kepekaan sejarah menyangkut orang-orang hebat di balik perekonomian Asia.” —JEFF ANDREW, PENGAMAT ASIA pustaka-indo.blogspot.com ASIAN GODFATHERS Menguak Tabir Perselingkuhan Pengusaha dan Penguasa Joe Studwell mencerdaskan, mencerahkan pustaka-indo.blogspot.com Diterjemahkan dari ASIAN GODFATHERS Money and Power in Hong Kong and South-east Asia Hak cipta © Joe Studwell, 2007 Hak terjemahan Indonesia pada penerbit All rights reserved Penerjemah: Yanto Musthofa Editor: Julie Indahrini Desain sampul: Iksaka Banu Tata letak: Dadang Kusmana Cetakan 1, November 2015 Diterbitkan oleh PT Pustaka Alvabet Anggota IKAPI Ciputat Mas Plaza Blok B/AD Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 5A, Ciputat Tangerang Selatan 15412 - Indonesia Telp. +62 21 7494032, Faks. +62 21 74704875 Email: [email protected] www.alvabet.co.id Perpustakaan Nasional RI. Data Katalog dalam Terbitan (KDT) Studwell, Joe Asian Godfathers: Menguak Tabir Perselingkuhan Pengusaha dan Penguasa/Joe Studwell; Penerjemah: Yanto Musthofa; Editor: Julie Indahrini Cet. 1 — Jakarta: PT Pustaka Alvabet, November 2015 432 hlm. 15 x 23 cm ISBN 978-602-9193-76-3 1. Sosial/Politik I. Judul. pustaka-indo.blogspot.com
    [Show full text]
  • “Relationship Between Trading at Ask Price and the End-Of-Day Effect in Hong Kong Stock Exchange”
    “Relationship between Trading at Ask Price and the End-of-Day Effect in Hong Kong Stock Exchange” AUTHORS Alex W.H. Chan Alex W.H. Chan (2005). Relationship between Trading at Ask Price and the End- ARTICLE INFO of-Day Effect in Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2(4) RELEASED ON Monday, 05 December 2005 JOURNAL "Investment Management and Financial Innovations" FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org 124 Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4/2005 Relationship between Trading at Ask Price and the End-of- Day Effect in Hong Kong Stock Exchange Alex W.H. Chan1 Abstract This paper presents an empirical study on the intraday trading behavior of Hang Seng In- dex constituent stocks in Hong Kong Stock Exchange. We use LOGIT model to analyze the prob- ability of a trade occurring at the ask price and investigate its relationship with the end-of-day ef- fect. We find some systematic patterns of trading at ask price over different trading time intervals. This systematic pattern of trading at ask price can explain around one-third of the abnormal return from the end-of-day effect. JEL classification: G10, G12, G15 Key words: Intraday Return, Trade at Ask, End-of-Day Effect. 1. Introduction Many empirical investigations on the U.S. stock market document systematic patterns for the intraday stock price generating process (e.g. Wood, McInish and Ord (1985), Harris (1986) and Jain and Joh (1988)) and systematic intraday trading behavior of investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ready for Take-Off
    Construction & real estate / Hong Kong 11 January 2012 Hysan Development Target price: HK$35.20 Up/downside: +35.1% 14 HK | HYSNY US Share price (9 Jan): HK$26.05 Initiation: ready for take-off • Hysan has one of the best pure retail portfolios in Asia and its potential is just starting to emerge • We believe the company is poised for a take-off in earnings and dividend growth, which could last for several years • It offers both growth and defensive appeal; coverage initiated with a Buy rating How do we justify our view? over 3x more than Hysan’s current Risks. We see the main risk as a share price, in three years’ time. We decline in Mainland visitors to Hong apply a 40% discount to our end- Kong. In addition, we believe good 2012E NAV to derive our six-month execution is required to bring out the target price of HK$35.2, implying 35% full potential of Hysan’s portfolio. Jonas Kan, CFA upside potential. (852) 2848 4439 Share price performance [email protected] Catalysts. The opening of Hysan (HK$) (%) Yannis Kuo Place, scheduled in mid-2012, is a 44 110 (852) 2773 8735 38 100 [email protected] strong potential catalyst, and also one whose significance we believe extends 32 90 Alex Ye beyond driving net-profit growth of 26 80 (852) 2848 4471 21.8% for 2012E and 23% YoY for 20 70 [email protected] Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 2013E. We think Hysan’s retail and Hysan Development (LHS) Relative to HSI (RHS) office portfolio and also Causeway Bay Investment case.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2019 2018 Change Earnings & Dividends# Per Share Earnings per Share # Performance nd Dividends per Share Celebrating its 52 3.5 Loss per share HK$(0.67 ) HK$(0.45 ) 48% 3 Dividends per share year of operation, Television 2.5 - Interim HK$0.30 HK$0.30 2 - Final HK$0.20 HK$0.70 HK$0.50 HK$1.00 Broadcasts Limited is the 1.5 HK$ 1 HK$’mil HK$’mil leading terrestrial TV broadcaster 0.5 Revenue from external customers - Hong Kong TV broadcasting 2,190 2,923 -25% Since0 2016, TVB has headquartered in Hong Kong. TVB - myTV SUPER 442 402 10% -0.5 - Big Big Channel business 129 87 47% been-1 transformed from - Programme a licensing and 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 is also one of the largest distribution 740 870 -15% YEAR # excluding special dividend - Overseas pay TV and traditional media to a TVB Anywhere 144 140 3% commercial Chinese programme - Other activities 4 55 -92% major digital player, 3,649 4,477 2019 Revenue from External Customers by producers in the world with an Operating Segment Segment profit/(loss)* % relating to 2018 are shown in brackets operating over-the-top - Hong Kong TV broadcasting (304 ) 194 N/A annual production output of over - myTV SUPER 40 16 154% Hong Kong TV broadcastingservices - Big Big Channel business 44 (19 ) N/A 60% (65%) myTV SUPER - Programme licensing and 22,000 hours of dramas and distribution 412 414 -1% Programmeand TVB Anywhere - Overseas, pay TV and licensing and TVB Anywhere (10 ) (16 ) -37% variety programmes, in addition distribution - Other activities (4 ) (17 ) -74% 20%social (19%) media platform - CorporateBig support# (152 ) (150 ) 1% to documentaries and news Other activities 26 422 -94% 1% (2%) Big Channel and e-commerceTotal expensesΔ 3,698 4,062 -9% reports, and an archive library of Overseas pay TV myTV SUPER Big Big andplatform TVB Anywhere 12% (9%) Big ChannelBig Shop Loss attributable.
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th October 1999
    The Court of Final Appeal has ruled that planning restrictions contained in Outline Zoning Plans may be challenged on constitutional grounds as well as administrative law grounds. In this edition we review the judgment and its likely effect on future deliberations of the Town Planning Board. The Editors CONTENTS PLANNING REGISTRAIONS MAY BE CONSTRITUTIONALLY REVIEWED FEATURE: Page Background PLANNING Wan Chai (“WC”) and Causeway Bay (“CB”) are major commercial areas where Hysan Development REGISTRAIONS MAY BE Company Limited (“Hysan”) owns a number of prominent sites. CONSTRITUTIONALLY Several years ago, the Town Planning Board (“Board”) reviewed 8 town planning restrictions applying REVIEWED .......................... 1 to new development within CB and WC, culminating in the gazetting of a Draft Outline Zone Plans (“DOZP”) for each area: CB on 17 September 2010 and WC on 24 September 2010. TOWN PLANNING.………… 4 During the period of public consultation, Hysan delivered written submissions opposing many of the WEST KOWLOON height and other restrictions mandated by the CB-DOZP and WC-DOZP. Hysan also made oral representations at the only public meetings of the Board on 11 March 2011 and 26 April 2011 CULTURAL DISTRICT respectively. (WKCD)…...………………… 5 The Board rejected all of Hysan’s submissions, other than in relation to one restriction in the CB-DOZP. HONG KONG BRIEFING..... 6 Consequently, Hysan (and other related companies) applied for judicial review of the Board’s decisions. Hysan’s judicial review application ADVISORY COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT Hysan (and others) applied for judicial review of the decisions to implement the DOZPs. On 14 (ACE)………………………… 7 September 2012 Reyes J.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University
    Yale University From the SelectedWorks of Alec Stone Sweet 2020 The eN cessity of Balancing: Hong Kong's Flawed Approach to Proportionality - And Why it Mattters.pdf Alec Stone Sweet Available at: https://works.bepress.com/alec_stone_sweet/69/ HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 50 ■ PART 2 ■ 2020 The Necessity of Balancing: Hong Kong’s Flawed Approach to Proportionality, and Why It Matters r Alec Stone Sweet HKLJ-50(2)-9_Stone Sweet on Hysan.indd 1 10/9/20 7:22 PM The Necessity of Balancing: Hong Kong’s Flawed Approach to Proportionality, and Why It Matters r Alec Stone Sweet* Virtually all of the world’s most powerful high courts recognise the proportionality principle — as enforced through a distinctive sequence of subtests — to be an overarching criterion of constitutional legality. In Hysan Development Co Ltd v Town Planning Board, the Court of Final Appeal added a fourth and final “balancing phase” to what had been a truncated version of the proportionality framework. This article analyses Hysan and its effects from two perspectives. First, compared to the standard model of proportionality analysis, Hysan places deference to legislative and executive authority at its core, thereby transforming rights doctrine into a form of reasonableness review. Indeed, it creates an approach more akin to Wednesbury unreasonableness than proportionality. Second, the foreign case law invoked by the Court of Final Appeal does not actually support the Hysan framework. Unless corrected, judicial fidelity to Hysan will chronically reproduce three pathologies: analytical incompleteness; doctrinal instability; and judicial abdication. 1. Introduction The proportionality principle, as enforced through a distinctive, sequence of interrelated tests, is arguably the world’s most successful legal transplant.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    IN A CLEAR DIRECTION 2002ANNUAL REPORT Mission Hysan Development is committed to building and owning quality buildings, and being the occupier’s partner of choice in the provision of real estate accommodation and services, thereby delivering attractive and sustainable returns to shareholders. Contents 1 Highlights 2002 2 Chairman’s Statement 4 Operating and Financial Review 11 Case Studies 18 Social Responsibility 19 Human Resources 20 Principal Investment Properties 22 Report of the Valuer 23 Schedule of Principal Properties 24 Directors, Officers and Advisers 30 Corporate Governance 38 Audit Committee Report 39 Directors’ Report 42 Auditors’ Report 43 Consolidated Income Statement 44 Consolidated Balance Sheet 46 Balance Sheet 47 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 48 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 50 Notes to the Financial Statements 78 Five-Year Financial Summary Inside back cover Shareholder Information ANNUAL REPORT 2002 1 Highlights 2002 Year 2002 remained a difficult one for the Hong Kong economy generally. We regard it of paramount importance that we keep a clear focus amidst the challenging environment and continue to invest in areas that will enhance our asset value and underlying competitiveness. ■ Achieved strong occupancy: office: 95%, retail: 96% ■ Strong balance sheet with maturity profile further strengthened ■ Asset enhancement programme: re-launch of Bamboo Grove residential property well-received; works on Caroline Centre retail podium commenced Year ended 31 December 2002 2001 Change HK$’000 HK$’000 % Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Insider Dealing Tribunal of Hong Kong
    REPORT OF THE INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL OF HONG KONG On whether insider dealing took place In relation to the listed securities of CHINESE ESTATES HOLDINGS LIMITED Between November 19-21 1996 (both days inclusive) and on other related questions TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Notice signed by Financial Secretary under (i) section 16(2) of the Securities (Insider Dealing) Ordinance CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 a. A brief historical perspective 1 b. The interest of the Securities and Futures 7 Commission c. The constitution of the Tribunal 14 d. Legal representation 16 e. The sending out of ‘Salmon’ letters 16 f. The Preliminary Hearing 17 g. Witnesses called during the inquiry 21 h. The length of the inquiry 22 CHAPTER TWO THE LAW 24 PART ONE: GENERAL LEGAL PRINCIPLES 24 a. The standard of proof 24 b. Consideration of factual evidence 32 c. The drawing of inferences 33 d. Good character 33 e. Demeanour 34 PART TWO: A CONSIDERATION OF THE 34 ORDINANCE a. The securities must be those of a ‘listed 35 Page corporation’ b. The person dealing in the securities must be 35 ‘connected’ to the corporation c. The ‘connected’ person must ‘deal in’ the 35 securities (or their derivatives) or else counsel and procure another person to deal in them. d. At the time of ‘dealing’ the ‘connected’ person 36 must be in possession of information which he knows to be ‘relevant information’ PART THREE: RELEVANT INFORMATION 36 a. Not generally known to those persons who are 37 accustomed or would be likely to deal in the securities of the company … b.
    [Show full text]
  • Hysan Development Company Limited (Stock Code: 00014)
    Hysan Development Company Limited (stock code: 00014) INTERIM REPORT 2010 Hennessy Centre redevelopment MISSION To build, own and manage quality buildings, and being the occupiers’ partner of choice in the provision of real estate accommodation and services, thereby delivering attractive and sustainable returns to our shareholders. CONTENTS 1 HIGHLIGHTS 2 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 3 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 6 REPORT ON REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION 7 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT 8 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 9 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 10 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 12 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 13 NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 29 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 48 CORPORATE INFORMATION Inside back cover • SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Highlights • Group turnover up 3.1% • Further improvement in occupancy across the portfolio (Office: 91% (committed: 95%); Retail: 99%; Residential: 94%) • Steady performance expected for rest of the year Results Six months ended 30 June 2010 2009 Change HK$ million HK$ million % Turnover 877 851 3.1 Recurring Underlying Profit1 582 580 0.3 Underlying Profit2 590 583 1.2 Statutory Profit3 1,731 1,071 61.6 HK cents HK cents Earnings per share, based on: Recurring Underlying Profit1 55.39 55.65 (0.5) Underlying Profit2 56.15 55.94 0.4 Statutory Profit3 164.73 102.77 60.3 Interim dividend per share 14.00 14.00 – At 30 June At 31 December 2010 2009 HK$ million HK$ million (restated)* Shareholders’ funds 35,114 33,830 3.8 Adjusted Shareholders’ Funds4 38,724 37,251 4.0 HK$ HK$ (restated)* Net assets value per share 33.38 32.20 3.7 Adjusted net assets value per share 36.81 35.46 3.8 * The amount has been restated due to changes in accounting policy.
    [Show full text]