Review of Newer Contraceptive Agents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REVIEW MAHMOODA QURESHI, MD MARJAN ATTARAN, MD Department of General Internal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Clinic Review of newer contraceptive agents ABSTRACT WO THIRDS of reproductive-age women use some form of contraception, yet Advances in contraceptive technology have made birth 55% of the 6.3 million pregnancies each year control more effective, convenient, and safe. We review the in the United States are unplanned, and half newer products and some under development, including of these result in abortion. the latest oral contraceptives, injectable progesterone, Physicians should discuss contraception subdermal progestin implants, progesterone-releasing lUDs, with all sexually active patients of childbear- emergency contraception, and male contraception. ing age. Safe and effective contraceptive agents are available, but need to be adequate- KEY POINTS ly provided to at-risk populations. In this review we focus on the latest Newer oral contraceptives contain much lower doses of improvements in oral contraceptives, long- estradiol than older preparations and use newer progestins acting contraceptives such as injectable sus- with less androgenic activity. They therefore cause fewer pensions and subdermal implants, and med- side effects. icated intrauterine devices (IUDs). Advances in emergency postcoital contraception are also reviewed. Depomedroxyprogesterone acetate injections every 3 months are a good contraceptive option for women in • ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES whom compliance may be low. Oral contraceptives, the most popular method of reversible contraception in the United Progestin implants have a failure rate of 0.8 per 100 States,1 are highly effective, with a failure rate woman-years for the first 5 years of use, increasing to 2 per of 0.3 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of 100 woman-years by the 6th year. The implants should be typical use, or 0.1 per 100 woman-years of removed after 5 years. ideal use. Progesterone-releasing lUDs reduce the cramping and Mechanism of action increased menstrual bleeding that often occur with Used singly in high doses, both estrogens and nonmedicated lUDs. progestins can hinder ovulation but may cause side effects such as breakthrough bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, acne, and weight gain. Used in combination, they act synergis- tically and suppress ovulation at much lower doses, with fewer side effects. These hormones work in several ways. Ethinyl estradiol diminishes follicle-stimulat- ing hormone (FSH) secretion, leading to impaired follicular maturation and insufficient estrogen production via the ovaries. Progestins primarily inhibit luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and thus ovulation. In addition, progestins thicken the cervical mucus (mak- 358 CLEVELANDDownloaded CLINIC JOURNA fromL www.ccjm.orgOF MEDICINE on VOLUMSeptemberE 66 29,• NUMBE 2021. RFor 6 personalJUNE use199 only.9 All other uses require permission. ing it impermeable to sperm) and also cause TABLE 1 endometrial atrophy, thereby making implan- Progestins tation improbable. used in oral contraceptives Improvements in newer preparations First generation (no longer in use) Several refinements have made oral contra- Ethisterone ceptives much safer and better tolerated than Second generation when they were introduced in 1960, while Ethynodiol maintaining their high rate of effectiveness: Levonorgestrel Lower estrogen doses. Early oral contra- Norethindrone ceptives contained up to 150 |ig of the estro- Norethindrone acetate gen ethinyl estradiol; newer preparations con- Norgestrel tain only 20 to 50 jag. The side effects of Third generation (since 1992) estrogen increase with the dose and are less Desogestrel common with the lower-dose preparations. Gestodene (not available in the United States) On the other hand, breakthrough bleeding is Norgestimate seen more often with the low-dose prepara- tions but may also be due to missing pills or endometritis. Improved progestins. Progestins are syn- fibrinolytic enzymes, making thrombosis more thetic derivatives of testosterone, manipulated likely. The higher the dose, the greater the to be highly progestogenic and less andro- risk.5 Use of a second-generation or third-gen- genic. The progestins used in oral contracep- eration oral contraceptive is associated with 3 tives have evolved through three generations to 4 thromboembolic events per 10,000 (TABLE 1) and now have very little androgenic woman-years—more than three times the risk activity. in nonusers, but small in absolute numbers, Phasic preparations. Whereas older oral considerably less than with older agents, and contraceptives contain the same amount of half the risk in pregnant women (TABLE 2).4-6 Screening for estrogen and progestin in each tablet and are In view of this risk, oral contraceptives are factor V Leiden taken for 21 consecutive days in a 28-day still contraindicated in patients at higher risk, cycle, some newer ones are phasic—ie, they ie, those with any of the following: mutation is not vary the dose of progestin to achieve fewer • A history of thromboembolism deemed metabolic side effects. Pills that vary the estro- • Age greater than 35 and cigarette gen dose (Estrostep 21) are also available—in smoking necessary for theory, these reduce the occurrence of break- • A coagulation disorder. Of these, fac- oral through bleeding. A new formulation tor V Leiden mutation is the most common, (Mircette) containing 10 |ig of ethinyl estra- affecting 3% to 5% of the Caucasian popula- contraceptive diol during days 22 through 26 of the 28-day tion. In contrast, genetic deficiencies of pro- users pack is now available and should reduce tein C, protein S, and antithrombin III are breakthrough ovulation as well as break- rare. Factor V Leiden mutation is associated through bleeding. with an incidence of venous thromboem- bolism of about 6 events per 10,000 woman- Estrogen-related side effects years, but taking an oral contraceptive Although estrogens can cause nausea, breast increases the incidence to 29 events per tenderness, headache, decreased libido, 10,000 woman-years, suggesting that the two depression, and cyclic weight gain, their most act synergistically to promote coagulation.5 serious potential side effect is venous throm- Should all patients therefore be screened boembolism. Use of current oral contracep- for factor V Leiden mutation before starting tives is not considered a risk factor for cardio- oral contraceptives? This step is not deemed vascular disease or breast cancer.2 necessary, since the absolute risk is still very Venous thromboembolism. Estrogen small. However, patients should be asked alters the synthesis of coagulation factors and about any personal or family history of Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on SeptemberCLEVELAN 29,D CLINI 2021.C ForJOURNA personalL OF useMEDICIN only.E All otherVOLUM usesE 6require6 • NU Mpermission. BE R 6 JUNE 1999 359 CONTRACEPTIVES QURESHI AND ATTARAN TABLE 4 Moreover, recent studies have demon- Incidence of venous thromboembolism strated that the use of second-generation and with oral contraceptive use third-generation oral contraceptives does not increase the risk of stroke.10-15 Smoking POPULATION AND TYPE OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE INCIDENCE PER and increased age are the main determinants 10,000 WOMAN-YEARS of coronary artery disease and stroke, regard- less of oral contraceptive use. Current oral Premenopausal women not taking contraceptives do not cause hypertension, oral contraceptives 0.8 which was seen to develop in 5% of women Women taking any combined taking high-dose (> 50 pg ethinyl estradiol) oral contraceptive 3-4 agents. Second-generation progestins Breast cancer. Monophasic levonorgestrel 2.5 In theory, oral contracep- Others (not levonorgestrel) 1.8 tives could induce or help propagate estro- Third-generation progestins gen-sensitive breast cancer, although several Desogestrel + 30 pg ethinyl estradiol 4.0 large epidemiologic studies have not con- Gestodene 4.4 firmed this risk.16.17 In one of these studies,16 Pregnant women 6.0 women who were taking oral contraceptives Women with factor V Leiden mutation did seem to have a higher incidence of early- Not taking oral contraceptives 5.7 stage breast cancer, but this finding was Taking oral contraceptives 28.5 attributed to better detection and closer health surveillance of women taking oral contraceptives. Investigation in this area continues. venous thromboembolism, and those with a positive history should be considered for Progestin-related side effects screening.7 Progestin side effects such as weight gain, In 1995, epidemiologic studies reported a acne, and hirsutism are due to their andro- Taking oral higher risk of venous thromboembolism with genic properties and are far less common with contraceptives the newer third-generation oral contracep- the new progestins. In fact, some of the newer tives than with the second-generation pills are used to treat some of these conditions. has a lower pills.8-9 Subsequent studies showed that the risk of apparent increase can be explained by dis- Potential progestin side effects crepancies in age and age ranges used for Dyslipidemia. The third-generation thrombosis controls, confounding factors, greater use of oral contraceptives may have less of an than does the older drugs in low-risk pateints (ie, the adverse effect on lipid levels than older oral "healthy user" effect), and bias due to differ- contraceptives. In fact, the newer agents pregnancy ences in prescription practice and venous increased