DOCSLIB.ORG

Into Een An-E the Liefs Tiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Into Een An-E the Liefs Tiles The Achaemenids Ground floor Office Bronzes, that occupy a prominent place in this period, but the ethnic identity of their (559 to 330 BCE) The Seleucids The Parthians The Sasanids Conference Hall Iran Bastan Museum theremakers are still assemblages remains an from enigma. regions such as Jiroft and Shahdād, as well as Lurestan (313 to 146 BCE) (250 BCE to 224 CE) (224 to 651 CE) Sasanids Parthians Seleucids Of the Iranian-speaking peoples who migrated into Iran, one in particular — Iron Age Iron The Sasanids were from Persia - the homeland - (ICHTO) Ticket desk Achaemenids urbanism.During Urban the Middle centers Bronze on the Age, plateau, the Iranian including Bronze Age / Bronze Entrance The Seleucids him, Seleucus Nicator, chose Iran as his do- The Parthians The Elamite The Achaemenids The Sasanids Yard thea polity Persians—chose comprising Persianto head andsouth, Elamite where elements they apparently that eventually settled in led Fārs to Yard Main Elamite Plateau experienced a short fluorescence of (ancientthe rise of Anshān), the largest mingled empire with the the world native had Elamite seen up population, to that point. and formed Onemain of and Alexander’s established generals the Seleucid who succeeded Empire. Justwere as the the ruling Achaemenids—named clan of the Parthians, after Achaemenes—were another Iranian tribe the inhabiting ruling clan theof the north Per- of the Achaemenids - and therefore had claim were linked through an exchange network that - Seleucus had married a Persian princess sians, the Arsacids—named after Arsaces, the legend- ary founder of the dynasty— thedue toto Achaemenidmultiple defeats Persian at the legacy. hands Once of the Shahr-i Sokhteh, Hissār, Yahyā, Shahdād, and Jiroft, and therefore attained his legitimacy before theRomans, Arsacids the hadSasanids, lost their under divine the ambitionsmandate Followingon consolidating the wars and of conqueststructuring by Cyrusthe Em the- Great and his son and succes Iranians through his wife, but the discov- easterntheir independence. parts of Iran. The As theParthians Seleucid were grip master on this riders distant and part marksmen of their empire who are began still connected the plateau with Central Asia the southern sorpire. Cambyses, It was he Darius who introducedthe Great embarkedstandard- toremembered loosen, the today Arsacids in expressions and Parthians such sought as “the to Parthian grasp the Shot.” opportunity They were to divided, pursue Istakhr, not far from Persepolis, rose in Proto Elamite Elamite this network included copper from central and coast of the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, Elam, ized coinage, called darics, that along with an however, into several clans that made their empire far less homogenous and central- Ardashir I, a local dynast from the city of Proto Literature / Bronze Age / Iron Age andsoutheastern Mesopotamia. Iran andHighly Oman, desirable lapis commoditieslazuli from in Library extensive network of roads facilitated con- eryand ofstatuettes a few sanctuaries in Iran (some for Greek of which gods andare tact and interaction between people from and stone from southwestern Iran and Oman. These goddesses and the many Greek inscriptions system made the Parthians vulnerable to their new western neighbor, the mighty rebellionnew dynasty, and defeatedcalled the Artabanus Sasanids, V,named the last after The earliest and more extensively studied (albeit still little-known) civilization that distant corners of the Empire, both cultur- ized than those of their predecessors (Achaemenids) or successors (Sasanids). This Arsacid king-of-kings. They established a emerged in Iran was Elam. Elam—perhaps the longest-lasting civilization in the Badakhshān in Afghanistan and Quetta in Pakistan, Bronze head of seleucid ruler ally and commercially. Egyptian objects on display in the Museum) is a testimony Shami, Izeh, Khuzestan considered to be an Iranian territory. Despite several advances into the Parthian Em- the chief priest of the temple of the goddess Near East (from 3300 to 550 BCE)—encompassed a fairly sizable area from the Su- Sasanian Seleucid pire and the capture and looting of Ctesiphon—the Parthian capital, not far from Gilded silver plate to the spread of Greek culture in Iran. This Roman Empire, which was gradually encroaching upon Western Asia, traditionally Sasan, the grandfather of Ardeshir I, evidently siana Plain in the west to Fars in the east, in which the Elamites established Iran’s materialslazuli workshops reached have their been final discovered destinations at Shahr-i either in examples of this large-scale cultural con- Sari, Mazandaran the form of raw material or as finished goods. Lapis phenomenon influenced both the Seleucids discoveredtact and interaction at Susā and among Persepolis the subjects are fine of and their eventual successors, the Arsacids,- juggernaut and even defeat and repulse them on a number of occasions. The dam- homogenousĀnāhitā in Istakhr. empire that allowed them to embark on a far more history into eight periods: Proto-Elamite period (ca.3300 to 2700 BCE), First Inter- to have been centers for carving various objects - first cities (i.e., Susa and Anshan). Elamitologists1 divide the long span of Elamite Sokhteh and Hissār, while Yahyā and Jiroft seem whoing drove rose themup in fromdefiance Iranian of the soil. Seleucids in modern Baghdad—three times, Parthians managed to stand firm before the Roman aggressiveUnlike approachthe Arsacids, towards the the Sasanids Romans, strived pushing to them create back a acrosscentralized the Euphra and- northeast Iran, and after a century of fight due to their successive defeats and they were soon overthrown and replaced by the tes, sometimes even farther west. The new Sasanid approach also translated into theworking, Achaemenid stone-masonry, Empire. Arts stone- also carving, flour mediate Period (ca. 2700 to 2500 BCE), Old Elamite period (ca. 2500 to 1700 BCE), Golden beakerst mill. BCE age,Sasanids. however, was done and the Arsacids lost their divine mandate before Iranians major construction works within Iran, including several cities that have been from steatite and chlorite. A number of these ishedand glazed in the brick-working Achaemenid period:reached metal- new Second Intermediate Period (ca. 1700 to 1500 BCE), Middle Elamite Period (ca. carved products are on display in the ground floor of Marlik, Gilan The Parthian period lacks a coherent corpus of arts and its art seems rather provin- - Iron Age, 1 1500 to 1000 BCE), Third Intermediate Period (ca. 1000 to 850 BCE), Neo- Elamite thecopper Museum. and tin. A majorThis provided technological asuitable breakthrough medium in for the a whole new range of arti- - - Periodlar importance (ca. 850 tois the646 late BCE), and Terminal Elamite Period (646 to 550 BCE). All of Bronzefacts, especially Age was the arms introduction of different of bronzekind (for alloy clubbing by mixing and stabbing and types of excavatedarts the Sasanian (i.e., Veh period Ardešir witnessed and Bišāpur) a major and manyrenaissance, others from(e.g., Jundišapur,many rock-reliefs Ivan-e theseOld Elamite periods period are represented and, in the Museum with splendid artifacts, but of particu heights, as shown by several fine examples and deco- rative stuccoes to personal ornaments, silver or gilded vessels, textiles, projectiles), harnesses for beasts of burden, vessels of various types, and a whole several stone inscriptions is the Old Persian cial compared to that of the Achaemenids or the Sasanids. Yet a number of splen Karkheh, Dārābgerd, etc.) that await the archaeologist’s trowel. Similarly, in the Blue glazed terracotta bull on display in the Museum hall. Another in th stamp seals with exquisite designs, and last but not least, beautifully execut- ed with Elamite inscription novationscript introduced that can beduring seen thein the time Museum of Darius on did,of a presumablybut isolated findsParthian underline nobleman the aestheticdiscovered and in technological the early 20 accomplishmentscentury in Shami inof period, when Elamite Chogha Zanbil, Khuzestan high level of craftsmanship. Parthian art. Perhaps first and foremost among these is the life-size bronze statue and realistic images on coins. Several examples of different categories if Sasanian civilization reached especially, the Middle Elamite array of personal ornaments. Examples on display in the Museum hall speak of a The Parthians were also master glass-makers, and exam- remarkable heights in Middle Elamite Period second millennium BCE, waves of newly arrived Iranian-speaking peoples migrat- The Sasanids succeeded in creating another golden age in Iran but, towards the ca. 1250 BCE thefailed Great. to withstandDespite its thepower better-equipped, and glory and southwesternples of this art Irancan beand found now inon the display museum in the hall. Museum hall. political power and cultural As the indigenous cultures of Iran experienced a period of decline in the mid- artifactsend of the are dynasty, on display incessant in the Museumwar with hall. the Romans, as well as internal feuds over glory, perhaps best demonstrated policybattle-hardened, of tolerance, and the tactically Achaemenid more Empire com- the imperial throne, and economic problems due to salinization of agricultural Salt man ingthe intocentral Iran plateau from Central and from Asia there began to tothe inject south a (tonew later spirit become into Iranian the Persians), life. The Natural mummy of a man including head, and parts of trunk, a lower
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Darvi Tepe Chehr, a Workshop Open Site from the Middle Palaeolithic Period in Harsin Region, Kermanshah Province P
    Vol. 10, No. 25, Summer 2020 7 Darvi Tepe Chehr, A Workshop Open Site from the Middle Palaeolithic Period in Harsin E. ISSN: 2345-5500 Region, Kermanshah Province & P. ISSN: 2345-5225 P. Mohammad Eghbal Chehri 2020 10, No. 25, Summer Vol. Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Islamic Azad Univerty, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran [email protected] Hamed Vahdati Nasab Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran DOI: 10.22084/nbsh.2020.17083.1795 Received: 2018/10/25 - Accepted: 2019/07/12 Abstract The valleys and margins of the intermountain plains between Harsin and Bisetun are among the key geographical areas in the Zagros Palaeolithic studies. Recent archaeological research has shown that some of the Zagros Paleolithic sites are adjacent to radiolarian rocks of chert. Darvi Tepe as one of these important sites with a considerable number of stone artifacts is located on the near of Chehr village and 10 km south of Bisetoon mountain. The geographical position of the Darvi Tepe is such that it lies between the Middle Paleolithic sites in the Harsin Mountains and the Paleolithic sites of the Bistoon Mountains. In this article, research questions were included what kind of usage does the site have on a rocky bed of natural radiolarian outcrops? By studing and typology of surface findings, what is the time period of Darvi Tepe? The study of the technology making and typology of the pieces collected from the Darvi Tepe shows that the site was used as an open workshop for the production of stone artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • JHE Wezmeh Accepted.Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Zanolli, Clément and Biglari, Fereidoun and Mashkour, Marjan and Abdi, Kamyar and Monchot, Hervé and Debue, Karyne and Mazurier, Arnaud and Bayle, Priscilla and Le Luyer, Mona and Rougier, Hélène and Trinkaus, Erik and Macchiarelli, Roberto (2019) A Neanderthal from the Central Western Zagros, Iran. Structural reassessment of the Wezmeh 1 maxillary premolar. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/75685/ Document Version Author's Accepted Manuscript Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html A Neanderthal from the Central Western Zagros, Iran. Structural reassessment of the Wezmeh 1 maxillary premolar Clément Zanolli a, *, Fereidoun Biglari
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadic Path
    Nomadic path With the onset of the Neolithic Revolution and the emergence of Mesopotamian populations, groups of people who lived in the surrounding mountains migrated to the banks of the large rivers of these areas and founded human civilization. People living in Zagros Mountains (western part of Iran) were likely the first people who had domesticated some animals many years ago, were among them. The life of these people was dependent on livestock farming; and each year, looking for good pastures, they migrated between two sides of Zagros Mountain range. But this lifestyle with its ancient traditions is still alive in Zagros Mountains. There are still some Bakhtiari tribes who migrate annually between the tropical regions in Khuzestan (ancient Elam) and the cold and elevated regions in the east of Zagros mountain range. This is a journey along the immigration path, From Susa to Isfahan. www.irannoborders.com E-mail: [email protected] https://www.instagram.com/Irannoborders/ Highlights: Visiting Tehran, the most modern city in Iran and the city of museums(Museum of Ancient Iran, national jewelry museum, the great traditional bazaar, Golestan and Saad Abad palaces. Visiting Shush, the main capital of Elam civilization; Shushtar, an ancient fortress city, and ChoghaZanbil Ziggurat. Exploring Shimbar region, a main region for Iranian nomads. Isfahan, half of the world! the city of Persian architecture. Best time: April www.irannoborders.com E-mail: [email protected] https://www.instagram.com/Irannoborders/ Day 1, 2 and 3: Because of the difference in details passenger’s arrival time, the first day is going to be Duration: 9 days Trip name Nomadic path the transportation from the airport to the hotel (code): Minimum 2/Maximum 10 Group Size: and rest day.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOCIETY for ASIAN ART PRESENTS Through the Pishtaq: Art, Architecture and Culture of Persia APRIL 22 - MAY 9, 2018
    THE SOCIETY FOR ASIAN ART PRESENTS Through the Pishtaq: Art, Architecture and Culture of Persia APRIL 22 - MAY 9, 2018 More than five hundred years before Christ, Cyrus the Great founded one of the world’s first empires at Pasargadae. Over the centuries Persian civilization has been impacted by diverse cultural influences from invading Greeks, Arabs, Mongols and Turks. Join Dr. Keelan Overton on a journey through Iran where impressive monuments serve as vivid testament to the extraordinary history and culture of the country. The name Persia, used by the ancient Greeks, is derived from the southwesterly province of Pars which was the cradle of the Persian Empire. It was here that the Achaemenids became the first kings of a united country. They built capitals at Pasargadae and Persepolis and ruled over territory which stretched from the Persian Gulf to the Black Sea and from China in the east to the Mediterranean shores in the west. It is a welcoming and beautiful country of contrasts, of jagged mountains and golden deserts punctuated by slender wind towers, crumbling clay-baked caravansaries, and everywhere a horizon pierced by mosques and turquoise minarets. ----------------------------------Tour Highlights -------------------------------------- Tehran– 3 nights Visit Jameh Atigh, 9th c. Friday Mosque Visit the National Museum of Iran complex: Learn about tribal rugs at a nomadic gallery Museum of Ancient Iran (History and Archaeology) Yasuj - 1 night Museum of the Islamic Era Drive through the beautiful Zagros Mountains to Yasuj
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of How the Thoughts of the Poet and Designer Are Reflected in the Architecture of Tomb Garden (Case Examples: Hafez and Saadi Tomb Garden)
    35 quarterly, No. 32| Summer 2021 DOI: 10.22034/jaco.2021.288405.1199 Persian translation of this paper entitled: بررسی تطبیقی نحوۀ انعکاس اند یشۀ شاعر و طراح بر معماری باغ مزار (نمونه های مورد ی: باغ آرامگاه حافظ و سعد ی) is also published in this issue of journal. Original Research Article A Comparative Study of How the Thoughts of the Poet and Designer are Reflected in the Architecture of Tomb Garden (Case examples: Hafez and Saadi Tomb Garden) Zahra Yarmahmoodi1*, Fatemeh Niknahad2 1. Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran. Received; 29/05/2021 accepted; 16/06/2021 available online; 01/07/2021 Abstract The garden of the tomb is the design of a symbol and a memorial that reflects the ideas, views, and beliefs of the person resting in it. Therefore, since people will visit this place in the future, it is better to be eternal and stable. As stated in various studies, the secret of a work’s immortality is its relationship with its viewers and users. Adherence to cultural and climatic patterns and adaptation to the conditions of the region and society is essential. Therefore, flexibility, appropriateness of the time, and the transfer of meaning are among the requirements for the design of spaces and monuments. The research uses the descriptive- analytical research method and employs the phenomenological approach to determine the relationship between the poet and the designer’s thought and the architecture of the tomb and in recording and transmitting the cultural-spatial identity of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Symbol of Gavaevodata and the Essence of Siavash in Shāhnāmeh and Its Replication on the Embossments of Persepolis
    Exploring the Symbol of Gavaevodata and the Essence of Siavash in Shāhnāmeh and its Replication on the Embossments of Persepolis Introduction The mythology of each ethnic group is rooted in their initial attitudes and thoughts about creation and the universe. When human science, knowledge and research had not yet begun, and the first man had to calm his troubled mind for his own reasons. The only way he could escape the horror of death was to turn to a supernatural and mythical power. Many words have been said about the meaning and roots of myths. Arab lexicographers consider the term myth in Persian (Ostoreh) as an Arabic word on the weight of "Ofoleh" meaning objects connoting unfounded and wonderful myths and words that have been written (Kazazi , 1993: 1). Myth is a narrative that revives the original reality and satisfies the deep religious need and is a basic element of human civilization; moreover, mythology and storytelling are not in vain in any way (Masoumi, 2009: 19). It is an art, creative and poetic that over time, with the creative power of their imagination, have turned every aspect of human life into a poetic symbol; The aspirations of human beings throughout history have found poetic interpretations during these myths and have been narrated from generation to generation, and over time, have crystallized in the aura of poetic imagination of different generations. In between, myth and epic have a close and fundamental connection with each other. The epic is the product of a myth, and the myth is left to the nurturing mother who breeds the epic and nurtures it on her lap.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary Brilliant Persia Tour (24 Days)
    Edited: May2019 Itinerary Brilliant Persia Tour (24 Days) Day 1: Arrive in Tehran, visiting Tehran, fly to Shiraz (flight time 1 hour 25 min) Sightseeing: The National Museum of Iran, Golestan Palace, Bazaar, National Jewelry Museum. Upon your pre-dawn arrival at Tehran airport, our representative carrying our show card (transfer information) will meet you and transfer you to your hotel. You will have time to rest and relax before our morning tour of Tehran begins. To avoid heavy traffic, taking the subway is the best way to visit Tehran. We take the subway and charter taxis so that we make most of the day and visit as many sites as possible. We begin the day early morning with a trip to the National Museum of Iran; an institution formed of two complexes; the Museum of Ancient Iran which was opened in 1937, and the Museum of the Islamic Era which was opened in 1972.It hosts historical monuments dating back through preserved ancient and medieval Iranian antiquities, including pottery vessels, metal objects, textile remains, and some rare books and coins. We will see the “evolution of mankind” through the marvelous display of historic relics. Next on the list is visiting the Golestan Palace, the former royal Qajar complex in Iran's capital city, Tehran. It is one of the oldest historic monuments of world heritage status belonging to a group of royal buildings that were once enclosed within the mud-thatched walls of Tehran's Arg ("citadel"). It consists of gardens, royal buildings, and collections of Iranian crafts and European presents from the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Tour.Pdf
    Andisheh Farazan Tourism Company Type of tourism tour: Historical tour Tour Code: ACH01 Period: The first six months of the solar year The second six months of the solar year staying time: Seven days ten days fourteen days Hotel class: Three stars four stars five stars Tourist route: Tehran (1 day) – kashan (1 day) - Esfahan (2 day) – Shiraz (2 day) - Tehran (1 day) Tourism program: Tehran: Saad Abad Palace - Golestan palace - Museum of Ancient Iran - Museum of Islamic Art - jewelry Museum Kashan: Fin Kashan Collection - (Fin Garden - Fin bathroom) Esfahan: Imam Khomeini Square - thirty three bridg - Paul Khaju - Forty Columns - Wank Church - Eight Paradise palace – Ali gholi agha Bath - Birds Garden Shiraz: Quran Gate – hafezieh – saadieh - Nasir al-Molk Mosque – narangestan ghavam – eram garden - Karim Khan citadel – Persepolis – naghsh rostam – pasargad – naghsh rajab - Ardeshir Babakan Palace Fun & Entertainment: Darband- Toochal - Traditional Iranian Restaurant - Isfahan Aquarium Tunnel – Telecabin Tour feature: Fluent leader in English and Arabic - Donating quality city souvenirs Web site: Andishehfarazan.ir Email: [email protected] Tell: +982144178290 Andisheh Farazan Tourism Company Type of tourism tour: Historical tour Tour Code: ACH02 Period: The first six months of the solar year The second six months of the solar year staying time: Seven days ten days fourteen days Hotel class: Three stars four stars five stars Tourist route: Tehran (2 day) – kashan (1 day) - Esfahan (2 day) – Shiraz (2 day) Kermanshah (1 day) - Tehran
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Site of Mirhadi Hoseini ………………………………………………………………………………………
    Historical Site of Mirhadi Hoseini http://m-hosseini.ir ……………………………………………………………………………………… . IRANIAN PREHISTORY Ganj Par: The First Evidence for Lower Paleolithic Occupation in the Southern Caspian Basin, Iran By: Fereidoun Biglari, Saman Heydari & Sonia Shidrang During the last two decades, there have been important Lower Palaeolithic discoveries in western Asia in regions such as the Levant, the Caucasus, and Pakistan pushing the evidence for the earliest hominid occupation in the region back to about 1 to 2 million years ago (Bar-Yosef 1998 and references therein). In terms of Lower Palaeolithic occupation, Iran is one of the least-known regions in western Asia with only a handful of evidence including some core-chopper assemblages from gravel deposits along Ladiz, Mashkid, and Kashafrud rivers in eastern Iran (Ariai & Thibault 1975; Hume 1976) and some surface occurrences and isolated finds of both core-chopper and Acheulian industries from the west and north- Figure 1. Rostamabad plain and the location of Ganj western parts of the Zagros region (Braidwood 1960; Par, looking north. Click to enlarge Sadek-Kooros 1976; Singer & Wymer 1978; Mortensen 1993; Biglari et al. 2000). The evidence for the Acheulian industry in Iran consists of a few examples of bifaces as isolated finds or in association with chopping tool industries from the Zagros region. Two of these bifaces are single finds from Quri Goll north-east of the Lake Urmia, and Gakia in the Kermanshah region. Two other are surface assemblages from Amar Merdeg in the Mehran Plain, and Pal Barik at Holailan. Of these, Holailan bifaces are in doubt and seem to be Levallois cores (Jacques Jaubert 2003 pers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Iran Triplog October 10 to 12.We Started the Trip with an Overnight,13
    Iran Triplog October 10 to 12.We started the trip with an overnight,13-hour Qatar flight to Doha; followed by a 7-hour layover; and then a 2.5-hour flight to Tehran, arriving at 4 am on the 12th. We whisked through security and immigration (unlike others whose luggage was thoroughly searched) and we were met at the airport by a driver and the assistant guide, Javad. The drive to the Espinas Hotel (which turned out to be the best hotel of the trip) took about an hour and we checked in and napped for 3 hours or so before going to breakfast. October 12. We were pleased to discover when we checked in that the breakfast was included. It was a selection of yoghurts, cheeses, breads, cereals, various fruits, dates, honey, a spinach frittata “cucu sabzi”, etc., as well 3 or 4 hot selections and an omelet station. To varying degrees, this was the breakfast at each hotel, so we had lots of options and plenty of food. After breakfast, we walked around the neighborhood a bit, then walked to Laleh Park and spent some time walking there. It’s a very large park, and each time we walked there we discovered a new section. There is a small Japanese area with stepping stones, a stage with cement seating, an area where locals blocked off sections and put up nets for net games, a long waterway flanked with blooming oleander, sculptures of historical figures, and flower beds in various areas, a pond, an area of woods…oh, and lots of very well-fed cats.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracta Iranica, Volume 30 | 2010, « Comptes Rendus Des Publications De 2007 » [En Ligne], Mis En Ligne Le 08 Avril 2010, Consulté Le 30 Septembre 2020
    Abstracta Iranica Revue bibliographique pour le domaine irano-aryen Volume 30 | 2010 Comptes rendus des publications de 2007 Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/abstractairanica/37410 DOI : 10.4000/abstractairanica.37410 ISSN : 1961-960X Éditeur : CNRS (UMR 7528 Mondes iraniens et indiens), Éditions de l’IFRI Édition imprimée Date de publication : 8 avril 2010 ISSN : 0240-8910 Référence électronique Abstracta Iranica, Volume 30 | 2010, « Comptes rendus des publications de 2007 » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 08 avril 2010, consulté le 30 septembre 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ abstractairanica/37410 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/abstractairanica.37410 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 30 septembre 2020. Tous droits réservés 1 NOTE DE LA RÉDACTION Ce volume 30, 2007 d'ABSTRACTA IRANICA, paraissant en 2010 rend compte des travaux publiés pendant l'année 2007/1385-1386, ainsi que des publications antérieures à cette date et qui n'ont pu être présentées au moment voulu. Abstracta Iranica, Volume 30 | 2010 2 SOMMAIRE Avant propos – Abstracta Iranica 30 – 2007 PRÉFACE – Abstracta Iranica 30 – 2007 Rémy Boucharlat, Poupak Rafii Nejad et Catherine Azarnouche Liste des collaborateurs – Abstracta Iranica 30 – 2007 Comité de Direction – AI 30 - 2007 Comité de Rédaction – AI 30 - 2007 Rédaction Liste des sigles Traduction des noms d'institutions et d'ouvrages périodiques 1. Bibliographie, Recueils d’articles et Ouvrages généraux 1.1 Bibliographie, catalogues de manuscrits Manuscripts en écriture arabe du Musée régional de Nukus (République autonome du Karakalpakstan, Ouzbékistan): Fonds arabe, persan, turkī et karakalpak. Istituto per l’Oriente “C.A. Nallino” – CNRS “Mondes Iranien et Indien”, Roma, 2007, 282 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Archaeologists Vol
    International Journal of the Society of Iranian Archaeologists Vol. 2, No. 4, Summer- Autumn 2016 An Analytical Study on the Bronze Age Cultures of Harsin, Kermanshah Province (Iran) Parisa Naseri University of Shahrekord Mohammad Eghbal Chehri Islamic Azad University Received: May, 30, 2016 Accepted: October, 21, 2016 Abstract: Despite the fact that the prehistoric period and particularly the Bronze Age in Central Zagros have been well studied and identified to some extent, no systematic research has been conducted by foreign or Iranian archeologists on the subject of Harsin County. A total of 29 sites belonging to the Bronze Age have been identified in the archeological investigation of the region between 2002 and 2010. Based on the surface findings, all of these sites belong to the Middle and Late Bronze Age. Furthermore, it was discovered that most of these sites formed on the banks of permanent and seasonal rivers and lakes. As for the extent of residential sites of Bronze Age in the region and their location, it is implied that there were rather important and large sites along with small villages, indicating close relationships with the neighboring regions at the end of the third millennium and the beginning of the second millennium B.C. (Middle Bronze Age). The significance of the current study lies in the fact that no evidence was obtained from the Early Bronze Age (Yanik Culture), while the region has maintained numerous cultural relationships with the neighboring areas such as Kangavar with ceramics such as Godin III, Mahidasht and Lorestan from the Middle to Late Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]