DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mabo Legacy the START of a REWARDING JOURNEY for VICTORIAN BAR MEMBERS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No.152 Spring 2012 ISSN 0159 3285 ISSN The Mabo Legacy THE START OF A REWARDING JOURNEY FOR VICTORIAN BAR MEMBERS. Behind the wheel of a BMW or MINI, what was once a typical commute can be transformed into a satisfying, rewarding journey. With renowned dynamic handling and refined luxurious interiors, it’s little wonder that both BMW and MINI epitomise the ultimate in driving pleasure. The BMW and MINI Corporate Programmes are not simply about making it easier to own some of the world’s safest, most advanced driving machines; they are about enhancing the entire experience of ownership. With a range of special member benefits, they’re our way of ensuring that our corporate customers are given the best BMW and MINI experience possible. BMW Melbourne, in conjunction with BMW Group Australia, is pleased to offer the benefits of the BMW and MINI Corporate Programme to all members of The Victorian Bar, when you purchase a new BMW or MINI. Benefits include: BMW CORPORATE PROGRAMME. MINI CORPORATE PROGRAMME. Complimentary scheduled servicing for Complimentary scheduled servicing for 4 years / 60,000km 4 years / 60,000km Reduced dealer delivery charges Reduced dealer delivery charges Complimentary use of a BMW during scheduled Complimentary valet service servicing* Corporate finance rates to approved customers Door-to-door pick-up during scheduled servicing A dedicated Corporate Sales Manager at your Reduced rate on a BMW Driver Training course local MINI Garage Your spouse is also entitled to enjoy all the benefits of the BMW and MINI Corporate Programme when they purchase a new BMW or MINI. For more information, please email [email protected], or contact Simon Reid or Chris Mayes on (03) 9268 2222 BMW AND MINI CORPORATE PROGRAMME. BMW Melbourne 118 City Road, Southbank. Tel (03) 9268 2222. www.bmwmelbourne.com.au LMCT 8155 MINI Garage Kings Way 209 Kings Way, South Melbourne. Tel (03) 9268 2222. www.melbourne.minigarage.com.au LMCT 8155 Terms & Conditions apply and can be viewed at bmw.com.au/corporate and mini.com.au/corporate. *Selected models only. BMW13155_275x210_Corporate Vic Bar_FA.indd 1 11/09/12 3:56 PM No. 152 Spring 2012 Editorial 2 The Editors – Mabo, Vicbar and the Vibe 3 Chairman’s Cupboard - Independence, Service and the Stuff of Legend News and Views 5 Mabo – The Case that Made History 9 The Power of Sport 12 Two Years On 14 Launching the Law Library of Victoria 16 Women Lawyers’ Achievement Awards 18 Victorian Bar Pro Bono Awards 2012 5 51 20 New Tricks for Old Dogs (and Old Tricks for New Ones) 21 Hanks, Gordon and Hill: Constitutional Law in Australia 23 International Commission of Jurists 24 World Bar Conference – London 2012 27 New Magistrates Court Mediation Initiative 29 Ethics Committee Bulletin 31 Me and Myanmar 33 A Resolution to Mediate 35 Lifting the Bar to an Asian Practice 36 Doing Business and Resolving Disputes with China 37 Some History and a Little Lore 43 On the Retirement of the Hon Justice Hansen 67 Around Town 45 The 2012 Bar Dinner Editors 51 Victorian Bar Dinner Speech Paul Hayes and Sharon Moore 54 The Hon Justice Ashley Farewell Dinner 57 An Atlas Hugged: Sierra Leone VBN Editorial Committee Paul Hayes and Sharon Moore (Editors), Georgina Costello, Anthony Strahan (Deputy 59 Criminal Bar Association Emmanuel Saffa Abdulai Dinner Editors), Justin Tomlinson, Louise Martin, Maree Norton and Benjamin Jellis 61 The Third Bar Legends’ Dinner Contributors 65 A Feral Win’d Back of the Lift* The Honourable Justice Susan Crennan AC, The Hon Chief Justice Marilyn Warren AC, The Hon Justice Hollingworth, The Hon John Coldrey QC, The Hon Hartley Hansen QC, The 66 Quarterly Counsel Hon Peter Heerey AM QC, The Hon Robert Clark MP, Attorney-General for Victoria, Julian 67 Silence All Stand Burnside AO QC, Jack Rush RFD QC, Melanie Sloss SC, Tony Neal SC, Richard McGarvie SC, 70 Gonged Mark Moshinsky SC, Georgina Schoff SC, David Bailey, William Lye, Paul Hayes, Steven 71 Adjourned Sine Die L to R: Greg McIntyre (plaintiffs’Anger, Susan solicitor), Brennan, Eddie MatthewMabo and theFisher, author, Jane enjoying Treleaven, refreshments Sharon during Moore, Georgina Costello, an adjournment in SupremeAnthony Court Strahan, sittings, Murray Justin Island,Tomlinson, 22–25 Louise May 1989. Martin, The Mareehats were Norton, woven Benjaminby Jellis, Robin 79 Obituaries Meriam women. [photo: Annthe author] Robinson, Ashley Halphen, Jane King, Nerida Wallace, Sa’ad Hossain, Sally Bodman 82 March 2012 Victorian Bar Readers’ Course Publisher Boilerplate The Victorian Bar Inc. 83 When on Circuit, who Leads out of Court? Owen Dixon Chambers, 205 William Street, Melbourne 3000. Registration No. A 0034304 S. 84 Gallimaufry This publication of Victorian Bar News may be cited as (2012) 152 Vic B.N. 86 Verbatim Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Bar Council or the Bar or of any 88 Restaurant Review person other than the author. 89 The Wine Bar Advertising 90 Dear Themis All enquiries including requests for advertising rates to be sent to: 91 A Bit About Words Curry Ms Sally Bodman 93 Book Review: Call me Emilios The Victorian Bar Inc. 205 William Street, Melbourne 3000 94 Book Review: Mabo in the Courts Tel: (03) 9225 7909 96 VBN 151 Essay Competition Winning Entry Email: [email protected] 97 VBN 152 Caption Competition Design and Production Avalanche Creative Solutions Pty Ltd; www.avalanchecreative.com.au * Material in this section is current as at 23 September 2012 Contributors All contributions to Victorian Bar News should be in word format and are to be emailed to [email protected]. VBN Boilerplate submissions should not exceed 400 words. All articles submitted for consideration for publication in Victorian Bar Review should be in word format and conform with the style guide prescribed by the Australian Guide for Legal Citation (http://mulr.law.unimelb.edu.au/files/aglcdl.pdf). Cover Photo Eddie Mabo and Dr Bryan Keon-Cohen AM QC outside the Supreme Court of Queensland. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this publication may contain images and names of people who have died. Victorian Bar News acknowledges the traditional owners of the Kulin Nation and pays its respects to their elders part and present. www.vicbar.com.au VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Mabo, Vicbar & The Vibe Editorial In keeping with this edition’s theme, we also feature a review of Keon-Cohen’s book, by Robin Ann Robinson. The history and folklore of the Victorian Bar has been passed down from generation to generation of Barristers, usually from Mentor to Reader, or in the candid observations of our more senior members to guests during speeches at List or Bar dinners. The Legends Dinner held this year at the Essoign Club, was one such occasion and Victorian Bar News is delighted to have been able to capture the collegial bonhomie of the evening which celebrates the contributions of our legends to our Bar. Also, in keeping with our cultural heritage, former Victorian Bar News Editor, The Hon Peter Heerey AM QC, has chronicled some of the Victorian Bar’s more formal traditions in an excellent piece which importantly records some of the more formal quirks of our lineage. his year marks the 20th anniversary of the High For many of us it is easy to become consumed by the Court’s judgment in Mabo. For most Australians demands of our work and so it is refreshing as always to the first they heard of Mabo and its implications was include articles in this edition highlighting how some of our Tfrom the media maelstrom which surrounded the judgment members occupy their time away from chambers - from at the time it was handed down. However it soon became so Simone Bailey and her Olympic boxing tilt to Steven Anger well known it even found its way into popular culture. Who and his travels to Myanmar to Ashley Halphen and his life can forget Dennis Denuto, the bumbling solicitor character changing experience in Sierra Leone. in the 1997 film The Castle, submitting to the Court “It’s the The overall goal of Victorian Bar News is to provide a Constitution, it’s Mabo, it’s justice, it’s law, it’s the vibe…”? combination of current news of interest to Barristers, Mabo became a household name. Thankfully for Eddie information which addresses matters of record, light-hearted Mabo and the other plaintiffs they had no Denuto-like legal material and scholarly content. The latter category will, representatives. Instead, their case was framed and fought for the most part, be contained in the Victorian Bar Review for more than 10 long years by two members of the Victorian section of each edition. Our desire is to primarily source this Bar – the late Ron Castan QC and Dr Bryan Keon-Cohen material from our own members, many of whom publish AM QC (as he is now). Ron and Bryan’s combined intellect, excellent articles in other law journals. The Victorian Bar strategic planning and tireless and sacrificial dedication to Review is a timely opportunity for the Victorian Bar to the case were at the heart of the success of Mabo. Earlier this showcase the research analytical skills of our members and year, Bryan graduated with a PhD from Monash University accordingly we invite and encourage our readers to submit to with his thesis being his book, “Mabo in the Courts: from us for consideration for publication in Victorian Bar Review, Islander Tradition to Native Title: A Memoir”. Fittingly on any academically orientated legal articles which concern the twentieth anniversary of the landmark Mabo decision, matters of law or practice.
Recommended publications
  • Fact and Law Stephen Gageler

    Fact and Law Stephen Gageler

    Fact and Law Stephen Gageler* I The essential elements of the decision-making process of a court are well understood and can be simply stated. The court finds the facts. The court ascertains the law. The court applies the law to the facts to decide the case. The distinction between finding the facts and ascertaining the law corresponds to the distinction in a common law court between the traditional roles of jury and judge. The court - traditionally the jury - finds the facts on the basis of evidence. The court - always the judge - ascertains the law with the benefit of argument. Ascertaining the law is a process of induction from one, or a combination, of two sources: the constitutional or statutory text and the previously decided cases. That distinction between finding the facts and ascertaining the law, together with that description of the process of ascertaining the law, works well enough for most purposes in most cases. * Solicitor-General of Australia. This paper was presented as the Sir N inian Stephen Lecture at the University of Newcastle on 14 August 2009. The Sir Ninian Stephen Lecture was established to mark the arrival of the first group of Bachelor of Laws students at the University of Newcastle in 1993. It is an annual event that is delivered by an eminent lawyer every academic year. 1 STEPHEN GAGELER (2008-9) But it can become blurred where the law to be ascertained is not clear or is not immutable. The principles of interpretation or precedent that govern the process of induction may in some courts and in some cases leave room for choice as to the meaning to be inferred from the constitutional or statutory text or as to the rule to be drawn from the previously decided cases.
  • Ceremonial Sitting of the Tribunal for the Swearing in and Welcome of the Honourable Justice Kerr As President

    Ceremonial Sitting of the Tribunal for the Swearing in and Welcome of the Honourable Justice Kerr As President

    AUSCRIPT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED ABN 72 110 028 825 Level 22, 179 Turbot Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 PO Box 13038 George St Post Shop, Brisbane QLD 4003 T: 1800 AUSCRIPT (1800 287 274) F: 1300 739 037 E: [email protected] W: www.auscript.com.au TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS O/N H-59979 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CEREMONIAL SITTING OF THE TRIBUNAL FOR THE SWEARING IN AND WELCOME OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KERR AS PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KERR, President THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KEANE, Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE BUCHANAN, Presidential Member DEPUTY PRESIDENT S.D. HOTOP DEPUTY PRESIDENT R.P. HANDLEY DEPUTY PRESIDENT D.G. JARVIS THE HONOURABLE R.J. GROOM, Deputy President DEPUTY PRESIDENT P.E. HACK SC DEPUTY PRESIDENT J.W. CONSTANCE THE HONOURABLE B.J.M. TAMBERLIN QC, Deputy President DEPUTY PRESIDENT S.E. FROST DEPUTY PRESIDENT R. DEUTSCH PROF R.M. CREYKE, Senior Member MS G. ETTINGER, Senior Member MR P.W. TAYLOR SC, Senior Member MS J.F. TOOHEY, Senior Member MS A.K. BRITTON, Senior Member MR D. LETCHER SC, Senior Member MS J.L REDFERN PSM, Senior Member MS G. LAZANAS, Senior Member DR I.S. ALEXANDER, Member DR T.M. NICOLETTI, Member DR H. HAIKAL-MUKHTAR, Member DR M. COUCH, Member SYDNEY 9.32 AM, WEDNESDAY, 16 MAY 2012 .KERR 16.5.12 P-1 ©Commonwealth of Australia KERR J: Chief Justice, I have the honour to announce that I have received a commission from her Excellency, the Governor General, appointing me as President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
  • Review Essay Open Chambers: High Court Associates and Supreme Court Clerks Compared

    Review Essay Open Chambers: High Court Associates and Supreme Court Clerks Compared

    REVIEW ESSAY OPEN CHAMBERS: HIGH COURT ASSOCIATES AND SUPREME COURT CLERKS COMPARED KATHARINE G YOUNG∗ Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court by Artemus Ward and David L Weiden (New York: New York University Press, 2006) pages i–xiv, 1–358. Price A$65.00 (hardcover). ISBN 0 8147 9404 1. I They have been variously described as ‘junior justices’, ‘para-judges’, ‘pup- peteers’, ‘courtiers’, ‘ghost-writers’, ‘knuckleheads’ and ‘little beasts’. In a recent study of the role of law clerks in the United States Supreme Court, political scientists Artemus Ward and David L Weiden settle on a new metaphor. In Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court, the authors borrow from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s famous poem to describe the transformation of the institution of the law clerk over the course of a century, from benign pupilage to ‘a permanent bureaucracy of influential legal decision-makers’.1 The rise of the institution has in turn transformed the Court itself. Nonetheless, despite the extravagant metaphor, the authors do not set out to provide a new exposé on the internal politics of the Supreme Court or to unveil the clerks (or their justices) as errant magicians.2 Unlike Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s The Brethren3 and Edward Lazarus’ Closed Chambers,4 Sorcerers’ Apprentices is not pitched to the public’s right to know (or its desire ∗ BA, LLB (Hons) (Melb), LLM Program (Harv); SJD Candidate and Clark Byse Teaching Fellow, Harvard Law School; Associate to Justice Michael Kirby AC CMG, High Court of Aus- tralia, 2001–02.
  • After the Ball David Williamson

    After the Ball David Williamson

    David Williamson’s first full-length play, The Coming of Stork, premiered at the La Mama Theatre, Carlton, in 1970 and later became the film Stork, directed by Tim Burstall. The Removalists and Don’s Party followed in 1971, then Jugglers Three (1972), What If You Died Tomorrow? (1973), The Department (1975), A Handful of Friends (1976), The Club (1977) and Travelling North (1979). In 1972 The Removalists won the Australian Writers’ Guild AWGIE Award for best stage play and the best script in any medium and the British production saw Williamson nominated most promising playwright by the London Evening Standard. The 1980s saw his success continue with Celluloid Heroes (1980), The Perfectionist (1982), Sons of Cain (1985), Emerald City (1987) and Top Silk (1989); whilst the 1990s produced Siren (1990), Money and Friends (1991), Brilliant Lies (1993), Sanctuary (1994), Dead White Males (1995), Heretic (1996), Third World Blues (an adaptation of Jugglers Three) and After the Ball (both in 1997), and Corporate Vibes and Face to Face (both in 1999). The Great Man (2000), Up for Grabs, A Conversation, Charitable Intent (all in 2001), Soulmates (2002), Birthrights (2003), Amigos, Flatfoot (both in 2004), Operator and Influence(both 2005) have since followed. Williamson is widely recognised as Australia’s most successful playwright and over the last thirty years his plays have been performed throughout Australia and produced in Britain, United States, Canada and many European countries. A number of his stage works have been adapted for the screen, including The Removalists, Don’s Party, The Club, Travelling North, Emerald City, Sanctuary and Brilliant Lies.
  • Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?

    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?

    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts? Kcasey McLoughlin BA (Hons) LLB (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Newcastle January 2016 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University's Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Kcasey McLoughlin ii Acknowledgments I am most grateful to my principal supervisor, Jim Jose, for his unswerving patience, willingness to share his expertise and for the care and respect he has shown for my ideas. His belief in challenging disciplinary boundaries, and seemingly limitless generosity in mentoring others to do so has sustained me and this thesis. I am honoured to have been in receipt of his friendship, and owe him an enormous debt of gratitude for his unstinting support, assistance and encouragement. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor, Katherine Lindsay, for generously sharing her expertise in Constitutional Law and for fostering my interest in the High Court of Australia and the judges who sit on it. Her enthusiasm, very helpful advice and intellectual guidance were instrumental motivators in completing the thesis. The Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Newcastle has provided a supportive, collaborative and intellectual space to share and debate my research.
  • Who's That with Abrahams

    Who's That with Abrahams

    barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008/09 Who’s that with Abrahams KC? Rediscovering Rhetoric Justice Richard O’Connor rediscovered Bullfry in Shanghai | CONTENTS | 2 President’s column 6 Editor’s note 7 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion Access to court information The costs circus 12 Recent developments 24 Features 75 Legal history The Hon Justice Foster The criminal jurisdiction of the Federal The Kyeema air disaster The Hon Justice Macfarlan Court NSW Law Almanacs online The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Hon Justice Ward Saving St James Church 40 Addresses His Honour Judge Michael King SC Justice Richard Edward O’Connor Rediscovering Rhetoric 104 Personalia The current state of the profession His Honour Judge Storkey VC 106 Obituaries Refl ections on the Federal Court 90 Crossword by Rapunzel Matthew Bracks 55 Practice 91 Retirements 107 Book reviews The Keble Advocacy Course 95 Appointments 113 Muse Before the duty judge in Equity Chief Justice French Calderbank offers The Hon Justice Nye Perram Bullfry in Shanghai Appearing in the Commercial List The Hon Justice Jagot 115 Bar sports barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008-09 Bar News Editorial Committee Cover the New South Wales Bar Andrew Bell SC (editor) Leonard Abrahams KC and Clark Gable. Association. Keith Chapple SC Photo: Courtesy of Anthony Abrahams. Contributions are welcome and Gregory Nell SC should be addressed to the editor, Design and production Arthur Moses SC Andrew Bell SC Jeremy Stoljar SC Weavers Design Group Eleventh Floor Chris O’Donnell www.weavers.com.au Wentworth Chambers Duncan Graham Carol Webster Advertising 180 Phillip Street, Richard Beasley To advertise in Bar News visit Sydney 2000.
  • Admission of Lawyers∗

    Admission of Lawyers∗

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES BANCO COURT ADMISSION OF LAWYERS∗ 1. Now that the formal part of the proceedings has ended, I would like to warmly welcome you to the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Present with me on the Bench today are two other Justices of the Supreme Court. Together, we constitute the Court that has, in exercise of its jurisdiction, admitted you to practice. 2. As we gather here today, I would like to begin by acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land on which we meet, the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, and pay my respects to their Elders, past, present and emerging. We recognise the longstanding and enduring customs and traditions of Australia’s First Nations, and acknowledge with deep regret the role our legal system has had in perpetrating many injustices against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. 3. To all the new lawyers here today, welcome to the legal profession. Today is a day for celebration. You have all worked extremely hard to get here, through caffeine-fuelled nights and obscure problem questions, reading countless wafer-thin pages of textbook and more cases than you can hope to remember. You have entered the world of eggshell skulls, encountered the mysterious “reasonable person” and have understood that the Constitution consists of so much more than “the vibe of the thing”. 4. In becoming a lawyer, you have today joined a centuries-old profession with ancient origins.1 The custom of advocates swearing an admissions oath ∗ I express my thanks to my Research Director, Ms Rosie Davidson, for her assistance in the preparation of this address.
  • The High Court and the Parliament Partners in Law-Making Or Hostile Combatants?*

    The High Court and the Parliament Partners in Law-Making Or Hostile Combatants?*

    The High Court and the Parliament Partners in law-making or hostile combatants?* Michael Coper The question of when a human life begins poses definitional and philosophical puzzles that are as familiar as they are unanswerable. It might surprise you to know that the question of when the High Court of Australia came into existence raises some similar puzzles,1 though they are by contrast generally unfamiliar and not quite so difficult to answer. Interestingly, the High Court tangled with this issue in its very first case, a case called Hannah v Dalgarno,2 argued—by Wise3 on one side and Sly4 on the other—on 6 and 10 November 1903, and decided the next day on a date that now positively reverberates with constitutional significance, 11 November.5 * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 19 September 2003. I am indebted to my colleagues Fiona Wheeler and John Seymour for their comments on an earlier draft. 1 See Tony Blackshield and Francesca Dominello, ‘Constitutional basis of Court’ in Tony Blackshield, Michael Coper and George Williams (eds), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia, South Melbourne, Vic., Oxford University Press, 2001 (hereafter ‘The Oxford Companion’): 136. 2 (1903) 1 CLR 1; Francesca Dominello, ‘Hannah v Dalgarno’ in The Oxford Companion: 316. 3 Bernhard Ringrose Wise (1858–1916) was the Attorney-General for NSW and had been a framer of the Australian Constitution. 4 Richard Sly (1849–1929) was one of three lawyer brothers (including George, a founder of the firm of Sly and Russell), who all had doctorates in law.
  • Australian Nationalist Ideological, Historical, and Legal Archive

    Australian Nationalist Ideological, Historical, and Legal Archive

    AUSTRALIAN NATIONALIST IDEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND LEGAL ARCHIVE www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat MISSION STATEMENT (as updated, August 24 2002): This Site is a document archive linked to other Australian Nationalist political and information sites. A few Australian authors are on-line. As further works are prepared for Internet publication, additional Australian authors shall appear here. This document archive shall: (i) Ground Australian Nationalism ideologically and historically; this task is related to the legitimacy of the cause as well as the discussion of its favoured political expressions and historical place and activism; providing an accurate analysis is vital in combatting the misrepresentation of Nationalist ideology and politics by its opponents in politics and the media. (ii) Answer (when appropriate) the State-liberal-political-police propaganda which attempts to delegitimize the Nationalist organizations by an assertion that they have operated, or do operate, in a criminal manner; this task shall be addressed by relevant exposé of various "legal processes" operated against Nationalist leaders and other patriotic identities in the past. This Archive shall be continually updated and maintained as a resource for the instruction of a new generation of Nationalist leaders and activists. Texts of a general relevancy to the development of Australian Nationalist ideology and politics will also be placed upon this site. This includes material drawn from the corpus of Euro-nationalist discourse. The Editors welcome that our attention is drawn to selective material. The Editors will permit some debate around the issue of ideological and political formation and shall not censor any reasonable view on any subject which advances this objective.
  • Speech Given by Chief Justice Higgins Ceremonial Sitting on the Occasion of the Retirement of Justice Gray Friday 29 July 2011

    Speech Given by Chief Justice Higgins Ceremonial Sitting on the Occasion of the Retirement of Justice Gray Friday 29 July 2011

    Speech given by Chief Justice Higgins Ceremonial Sitting on the occasion of the retirement of Justice Gray Friday 29 July 2011 Welcome to everybody who is in attendance today and particularly may I welcome our guest of honour Justice Gray, his wife Laura and the extended Gray family, two generations thereof being present. I welcome the judges who are present today. Particularly we are honoured by the presence of Chief Justice Robert French of the High Court of Australia, former judges of this Court, the Honourable Jeffrey Miles, the Honourable John Gallop and former Master of this Court Alan Hogan. It is a great pleasure to have them with us today along with the Magistrates, Members of the Legislative Assembly, Practitioners, staff members, and of course, ladies and gentlemen. I acknowledge the apologies of those unable to attend this ceremonial sitting; their Honours, Justices of the High Court, otherwise than of course his Honour the Chief Justice, Chief Minister Katy Gallagher, the Federal Attorney General the Honourable Robert McClelland, the Commonwealth Solicitor General Stephen Gageler, Patrick Keane Chief Justice of the Federal Court, Deputy Chief Justice John Faulks and her Honour Justice Mary Finn of the Family Court, former judge of this court the Honourable Dr Ken Crispin who offers the inadequate excuse that he is sojourning in the south of France, and the further additional and recent acting judges of this court. Before I begin, I wish to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land the Ngunnawal people before I mention his Honour, Justice Gray, who joined the 1 ranks of this court on 12 October 2000 from South Australia, and was later appointed President of the ACT Court of Appeal on 21 December 2007, following the retirement of Justice Ken Crispin.
  • THE UNIVERSITY of WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW Volume 42(1) May 2017

    THE UNIVERSITY of WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW Volume 42(1) May 2017

    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW Volume 42(1) May 2017 Articles Ministerial Advisers and the Australian Constitution Yee‐Fui Ng .............................................................................................................. 1 All-Embracing Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation & ‘Moderate Originalism’ Stephen Puttick ........................................................................................................ 30 A Proportionate Burden: Revisiting the Constitutionality of Optional Preferential Voting Eric Chan ................................................................................................................ 57 London & New Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd v New Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd: Is It Authority That Directors Can Compete with the Company? Dominique Le Miere ............................................................................................... 98 Claims Relating to Possession of a Ship: Wilmington Trust Company (Trustee) v The Ship “Houston” [2016] FCA 1349 Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez‐Baig and Jordan English ......................................... 128 Intimidation, Consent and the Role of Holistic Judgments in Australian Rape Law Jonathan Crowe and Lara Sveinsson..................................................................... 136 Young Offenders Act 1984 (WA), Section 126 Special Orders: Extra Punitive Sentencing Legislation for Juveniles’ Craig Astill and William Yoo .......................................................................... 155 From Down
  • The Living Daylights 2(12) 26 March 1974

    The Living Daylights 2(12) 26 March 1974

    University of Wollongong Research Online The Living Daylights Historical & Cultural Collections 3-26-1974 The Living Daylights 2(12) 26 March 1974 Richard Neville Editor Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/livingdaylights Recommended Citation Neville, Richard, (1974), The Living Daylights 2(12) 26 March 1974, Incorporated Newsagencies Company, Melbourne, vol.2 no.12, March 26 - April 1, 28p. https://ro.uow.edu.au/livingdaylights/22 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The Living Daylights 2(12) 26 March 1974 Publisher Incorporated Newsagencies Company, Melbourne, vol.2 no.12, March 26 - April 1, 28p This serial is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/livingdaylights/22 Don Dunstan gags press • Brawling at Pentridge • Prying on teachers • Student news special a plagiarised potpourri of of news, Daylight Robbery views and trivia with MIKE MORRIS having to deal with the demoralising N december 12, 1969, a series of idealism . with one notable excep­ 22 today tion: Richard Milhous Nixon is a prospect o f a review o f their work bomb explosions rocked the Ital­ O by the Sydney morning herald's ian bank o f agriculture in Milan, killing quaker. Now aint that a spanner in the Thelma Forshaw. Last Saturday For- AST WEEK was our 21st issue, 16 people and wounding 88. Police G ood Works. shaw found herself unable to read which we characteristically forgot to and the judiciary moved, as they say, L HH, the last o f the high divers, more than 100 of the 760 words of announce, and this week we try out a new quickly and in a whirlwind drive ar­ the heavy rollers, the crazy Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity's rainbow.