The Priest, the Psychiatrist and the Problem of Evil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Priest, the Psychiatrist and the Problem of Evil THE PRIEST, THE PSYCHIATRIST AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL PUNITA MIRANDA PHANÊS • VOLUME 2 • 2019 • PP. 104–143 https://doi.org/10.32724/phanes.2019.Miranda THE PRIEST, THE PSYCHIATRIST, AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL 105 ABSTRACT This paper clusters around the problem of evil within the framework of depth psychology. The first part briefly introduces the narrative of the Book of Job as an example to contextualise how the ultimate question of God’s relation to evil remained unanswered and was left open-ended in Christian theology. The second part offers a historical reconstruction of the unresolved polemic over the nature of evil between Carl Jung and the English Dominican scholar and theologian Victor White (1902-1960). It explores their different speculations and formulations concerning evil and its psychological implications, until their final fall-out following White’s harshly critical review of Jung’s most controversial work on religion, Answer to Job. The final section of this paper introduces further reflections on a challenging theme that is no less resonant and relevant in today’s world of terrorism in the name of religion than it was in a post-war Europe struggling to recover from totalitarianism and genocide. KEYWORDS Carl Jung, Victor White, Book of Job, Answer to Job, evil. PHANÊS Vol 2 • 2019 PUNITA MIRANDA 106 God has turned me over to the ungodly and thrown me into the clutches of the wicked. All was well with me, but he shattered me; he seized me by the neck and crushed me. He has made me his target; his archers surround me. Without pity, he pierces my kidneys and spills my gall on the ground. Again and again he bursts upon me; he rushes at me like a warrior. I have sewed sackcloth over my skin and buried my brow in the dust. My face is red with weeping, dark shadows ring my eyes; yet my hands have been free of violence and my prayer is pure. (Job 16:11-17). he Book of Job (600-300 B.C.) is part of the ‘Wisdom’ books in the Judeo-Christian Bible and has been universally admired as a ‘literary masterpiece’ of ‘the highest magnitude’ of poetic dialogues and narrative prose (BishopT 2002:3, Parsons 1981:213). Its composition most likely took place in the 5th century between the Babylonian holocaust and through the period of exile (587-538 BCE). The book is divided in five parts: a) the prologue on earth and in heaven; b) the symposium-dialogues between Job and his three friends; c) three monologues: poem to wisdom, Job’s PHANÊS Vol 2 • 2019 THE PRIEST, THE PSYCHIATRIST, AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL 107 closing monologue, the speeches of Elihu; d) dialog with God; e) epilogue (Chase 2013:5). The figure of Job, in Jewish and non-Jewish contexts, has inspired many philosophers, religious thinkers, and intellectuals, as well as capturing the imagination of painters and musicians.1 Job’s exemplary virtue, with its ongoing variations in interpretation, from around the 6th century, has become a timeless model for contemplating the inscrutability of Divine Providence. The Book of Job is a tragic story of suffering, misfortune and endurance. The righteous and faithful Job becomes a victim of a wager made between Yahweh and Satan (Job 1:6-12). During this trial Satan challenges Job’s piety and God allows Satan to afflict Job with severe physical pain, emotional loss and grief (Job 1:13-20; 2:7). Job sees no justice in his sufferings and yet tries to understand why he is being punished, since he has not sinned. Three friends, Elipahz, Bildad and Zophar, first come to comfort Job (Job 2: 11) but then they argue that Yahweh is beyond human understanding (Job 22) and perhaps Job is suffering from a ‘hidden sin’ (Job 4:7-21; 11:7; 15; 18) (Parsons 1981:144). Once again Job protests his guiltlessness (Job 6:24-30; 7:11; 10:2). In the face of God’s silence and absence (Job 23) Job is aroused by anger and through his bitter complaints and endless torment (Job 16, 19), he disputes his innocence (Job 31), arguing his case ‘before God against a God’ (Job 13:3) who is indifferent to his plight (Job 27). In his revolt against God, Job hopes for vindication (Job 13:18; 31; 35) and demands to know where wisdom is to be found (Job 28). God ignores his plea (Job 30:20; 31:35). The only answer that Job receives is through the angry remarks of another friend, Elihu (Job 32- 37), and through God’s appearance out of a whirlwind, showing aspects of His creation from stars to animals, including monsters like Behemoth and Leviathan (Job 38-41). After contemplating the cosmos Job repents and surrenders to the supremacy of God (Job 42:1-6). Yahweh then rewards him for his faithfulness and endurance; Job’s suffering is removed and his restoration includes health, twice as much property as before, new children, and an extremely long life (Job 42:7-17). The Book of Job still provides a lifetime reflection on how a good God could produce evil deeds; furthermore, it portrays in a very individual way the nature of human suffering and addresses profound questions 1 For a comprehensive list of commentaries on the Book of Job, see Bishop (2002:4-14). For visual and musical examples see especially the nineteen watercolours illustrations and the twenty-two engravings of William Blake (1757-1827) of the Book of Job; Marc Chagall’s (1887-1985) two lithographs ‘Job Praying’ and ‘Job in Despair’, a tapestry called ‘Job’ dedicated to all the disabled in the world; and Vaughan Williams’ (1872- 1958) piece, Job: A Masque for Dancing. PHANÊS Vol 2 • 2019 PUNITA MIRANDA 108 concerning rewards and punishments, the relationship between suffering and sin, faith and hope. Job as the innocent sufferer, on the one hand had to submissively endure a test of his sincerity, but on the other hand, as a rebel, he directly addressed God, questioning His unjust punishments. In this manner Job’s plight epitomised the undeserved suffering of mankind; his echoing cry challenging the divine-human relationship has never lost its vitality. It is this aspect of Job’s audacity that Jung further elaborated in his book Answer to Job.2 Jung believed that Job’s story and his questioning of God foreshadowed modern existential questions about a highly debatable all-good God who never gave an adequate answer to either the problem of evil, or His complicity in its origin and presence in the world. The opposites of good and evil, psychologically speaking, correspond to positive and negative aspects of human nature. The question of destructive forces manifesting within individuals and as a group phenomenon has recently been discussed in two collections of essays: Ethics of Evil: Psychoanalytic Investigations and Humanizing Evil: Psychoanalytic, Philosophical and Clinical Perspectives, both edited by the psychoanalysts Ronald C. Naso and Jon Mills in 2016. They explore the controversies surrounding definitions of evil, the plurality of its manifestation in the world and the intrinsic link between human freedom and the potential for evil. In sharp contrast to the integrative depth-psychological approach of evil discussed in these collections, this paper reconsiders the compelling narrative of Yahweh-Job in which Jung moves from metaphorical considerations of God and evil to questions of collective responsibility. Jung declares that we are all not only capable of committing individual crimes, but are also collectively responsible for the destructive actions of mankind. A case in point, that will be discussed later, is his perspective on ‘the dark God [who] has slipped the atom bomb and chemical weapons into [man’s] hands and given him the power to empty out the apocalyptic vials of wrath on his fellow creatures’ (Jung 1952, ATJ, CW11:§747). For Jung, the possibility of universal destruction through the atomic bomb had granted man an ‘almost godlike power’, 2 Antwort auf Hiob was first published in 1952 in Zürich. Then it was privately translated to English as Answer to Job by the Jewish analyst Dr. James Kirsch for a seminar held in Los Angeles in 1952-53 to a limited number of training analysts. In 1953 for the second edition of Answer to Job, Jung incorporated the corrections suggested by Kirsh. The current translation done by R.F.C. Hull was first published in London in 1954 and reprinted in 1956 by the Pastoral Psychology Book Club in New York. The book is now part of The Collected Works of C. G. Jung: Psychology and Religion West and East volume 11 printed in 1958. For more see Jung Letters, vol. 2:104; Jung, CW11:vii; Lammers (2007a:254, n5). PHANÊS Vol 2 • 2019 THE PRIEST, THE PSYCHIATRIST, AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL 109 but the question arises, do we have the moral maturity to handle such responsibility? ANSWER TO EVIL Naturally we can believe that God is different from the image of him that we possess, but it must be admitted on the other side that the Lord himself, while insisting on the Father’s perfect goodness, has given a picture of him which fits in badly with the idea of a perfectly moral being. (A father who temps his children, who did not prevent the error of the immediate parousia, who is so full wrath that the blood of his only son is necessary to appease him, who left the crucified one to despair, who proposes to devastate his own creation and slay the millions of mankind to save very few of them, and who before the end of the world is going to replace his Son’s covenant by another gospel and complement the love by the fear of God.) It is interesting, or rather tragic, that God undergoes a complete relapse in the last book of the New Testament (Jung to Père Lachat, 27 March 1954, CW18:§1556).
Recommended publications
  • Incline Your Ear - Or – How I Conquered Road Rage and Learned to Love My Commute
    Incline Your Ear - or – How I Conquered Road Rage and Learned to Love my Commute by Charles D.W. Morrison Seattle Jung Society Library Volunteer, first Saturdays Every disciple of the Buddha in early Buddhism was technically called sravaka, “hearer,” since the Lord had advised: ”One should listen to the Doctrine as a sick man to the words of a physician.” Furthermore . if one did listen, one could go beyond natural “insight” and achieve the “insight consisting of hearing” (srutrmayi-prjna), that is, a higher level of awareness that comes from listening to profound truths. - George Elder, Ph. D The Body: An Encyclopedia of Archetypal Symbolism, Ear chapter, p. 186 “Listen, that we may live,” Isaiah reminds us in the Old Testament. “Whatever is pleasant to the ear . fixes itself deeply within the breast,” St. Benedict later echoes. And the Zen master Hui-neng in his Platform Sutra relates how his sudden enlightenment was achieved by merely listening to someone else recite scripture. The spoken word has a long been understood as a powerful channel for the psyche’s deeper energies. There seems to be something about hearing a speaker’s intonation, pauses, and struggles to formulate his thoughts that brings the psyche’s messages more vividly alive. Is it only chance then that we live in a city with one of the largest and most accessible collection of recorded lectures on state-of-the-art psychology, spirituality and religion? Is this just an accident, or are we caught up in some archetypal energy and, like the sravaka, on the road to higher awareness through listening? At 700 tapes, over 100 speakers lecturing on topics from Alchemy to Tarot, occupying 16 feet of shelf space, it would seem that the Seattle Jung Society is indeed on the via audimus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dangerous Method
    A David Cronenberg Film A DANGEROUS METHOD Starring Keira Knightley Viggo Mortensen Michael Fassbender Sarah Gadon and Vincent Cassel Directed by David Cronenberg Screenplay by Christopher Hampton Based on the stage play “The Talking Cure” by Christopher Hampton Based on the book “A Most Dangerous Method” by John Kerr Official Selection 2011 Venice Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival, Gala Presentation 2011 New York Film Festival, Gala Presentation www.adangerousmethodfilm.com 99min | Rated R | Release Date (NY & LA): 11/23/11 East Coast Publicity West Coast Publicity Distributor Donna Daniels PR Block Korenbrot Sony Pictures Classics Donna Daniels Ziggy Kozlowski Carmelo Pirrone 77 Park Ave, #12A Jennifer Malone Lindsay Macik New York, NY 10016 Rebecca Fisher 550 Madison Ave 347-254-7054, ext 101 110 S. Fairfax Ave, #310 New York, NY 10022 Los Angeles, CA 90036 212-833-8833 tel 323-634-7001 tel 212-833-8844 fax 323-634-7030 fax A DANGEROUS METHOD Directed by David Cronenberg Produced by Jeremy Thomas Co-Produced by Marco Mehlitz Martin Katz Screenplay by Christopher Hampton Based on the stage play “The Talking Cure” by Christopher Hampton Based on the book “A Most Dangerous Method” by John Kerr Executive Producers Thomas Sterchi Matthias Zimmermann Karl Spoerri Stephan Mallmann Peter Watson Associate Producer Richard Mansell Tiana Alexandra-Silliphant Director of Photography Peter Suschitzky, ASC Edited by Ronald Sanders, CCE, ACE Production Designer James McAteer Costume Designer Denise Cronenberg Music Composed and Adapted by Howard Shore Supervising Sound Editors Wayne Griffin Michael O’Farrell Casting by Deirdre Bowen 2 CAST Sabina Spielrein Keira Knightley Sigmund Freud Viggo Mortensen Carl Jung Michael Fassbender Otto Gross Vincent Cassel Emma Jung Sarah Gadon Professor Eugen Bleuler André M.
    [Show full text]
  • C.G. Jung and the Red Book
    C.G. Jung and the Red Book http://www.gnosis.org/redbook/ Lectures presented by Lance S. Owens, MD Directory: Jung and Gnostic Tradition main page Introduction to the Red Book Lectures Jung and the Traditon of There are two sets of lectures presented below (in mp3 audio format), all Gnosis Lectures recorded during the original presentations. The first series of four lectures was presented at Westminster College to the general public in January Other Web Lectures and February of 2010, shortly after the Red Book was published. It provides a useful introduction to Jung and his Red Book ( Liber Novus ). Return to The second series of seven seminar evenings with a total of fourteen Gnosis Archive lectures was presented at Westminster College from September 2011 to May 2012. The seminar group was composed mostly of psychologists in clinical practice. This is a much more in-depth consideration and reading of the Red Book, and reflects an additional two years of my own deepening study of the text. Each of the lectures runs between about 70 and 90 minutes. It is my hope that you will find them useful. You are welcome to email question or comments to Lance Owens MD. Jung and Aion: Time, Vision and a Wayfaring Man , a major article by Dr. Owens discussing themes in Liber Novus and their effect in Jung's later work, is now available online in pdf format . The article was originally published in Psychological Perspectives (Journal of the C. G. Jung Institute of Los Angeles), Fall 2011. Recent Presentations by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philadelphia Jung Seminar Syllabus 2021-2022
    The Philadelphia Jung Seminar Syllabus 2021-2022 PAJA supports diversity, pledges equity, and fosters inclusivity. We strive for personal and cultural sensitivity in all our endeavors. We encourage students of any race, color, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity and national or ethnic origin to participate in our programs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the 2021-2022 academic year will be presented by video conference. Analysts in in training join the Philadelphia Jung seminar for the Saturday presentation from 9:00AM to 4:00PM. Fall Semester 2021 JUNG IN CONTEXT (Part One) Friday, September 10, 2021 Introduction to Jung in Context Mark Winborn, PhD, NCPsyA This seminar will introduce the history of Analytical Psychology and the development of Jung’s major theoretical constructs. Particular attention will be placed on the development of Jung’s theoretical system within the framework of his ongoing debate (from afar) with Freud over the nature of the psyche. We will also address the impact their split on the broader psychoanalytic world. Finally, we outline, compare, and contrast the major schools of Analytical Psychology: the classical model, the Jungian developmental model (Michael Fordham), Archetypal Psychology (James Hillman), and the work of Wolfgang Giegerich. Seminar Objectives: 1. Develop an understanding of the history of Analytical Psychology and its relationship with Freudian psychoanalysis. 2. Develop familiarity with the major constructs of Jung’s Analytical Psychology. 3. Develop an understanding of the different schools within Analytical Psychology. Required Readings: Eisold, K. (2002). Jung, Jungians, and Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol, 19(3):501-524 Jung, C.G. Analytical Psychology: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1925, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES to MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences Of
    MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Matthew Glen Minix UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2016 MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew G. APPROVED BY: _____________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _____________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader. _____________________________________ Anthony Burke Smith, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ John A. Inglis, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ Jack J. Bauer, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Daniel Speed Thompson, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Religious Studies ii © Copyright by Matthew Glen Minix All rights reserved 2016 iii ABSTRACT MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew Glen University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation considers a spectrum of five distinct approaches that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomist Catholic thinkers utilized when engaging with the tradition of modern scientific psychology: a critical approach, a reformulation approach, a synthetic approach, a particular [Jungian] approach, and a personalist approach. This work argues that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomists were essentially united in their concerns about the metaphysical principles of many modern psychologists as well as in their worries that these same modern psychologists had a tendency to overlook the transcendent dimension of human existence. This work shows that the first four neo-Thomist thinkers failed to bring the traditions of neo-Thomism and modern psychology together to the extent that they suggested purely theoretical ways of reconciling them.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Jung, New York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani
    Copyrighted Material IntroductIon: Jung, neW York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani September 28, 1912. the New York Times featured a full-page inter- view with Jung on the problems confronting america, with a por- trait photo entitled “america facing Its Most tragic Moment”— the first prominent feature of psychoanalysis in the Times. It was Jung, the Times correctly reported, who “brought dr. freud to the recognition of the older school of psychology.” the Times went on to say, “[H]is classrooms are crowded with students eager to under- stand what seems to many to be an almost miraculous treatment. His clinics are crowded with medical cases which have baffled other doctors, and he is here in america to lecture on his subject.” Jung was the man of the hour. aged thirty-seven, he had just com- pleted a five-hundred-page magnum opus, Transformations and Sym‑ bols of the Libido, the second installment of which had just appeared in print. following his first visit to america in 1909, it was he, and not freud, who had been invited back by Smith ely Jelliffe to lec- ture on psychoanalysis in the new international extension course in medicine at fordham university, where he would also be awarded his second honorary degree (others invited included the psychiatrist William alanson White and the neurologist Henry Head). Jung’s initial title for his lectures was “Mental Mechanisms in Health and disease.” By the time he got to composing them, the title had become simply “the theory of Psychoanalysis.” Jung com- menced his introduction to the lectures by indicating that he in- tended to outline his attitude to freud’s guiding principles, noting that a reader would likely react with astonishment that it had taken him ten years to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Jung Life Deirdre Bair's Biography of C.G.Jung
    Facts, dreams, culture, intimidation – another Jung life Deirdre Bair's biography of C.G.Jung Peter Geyer Derdre Bair: Jung: A biography Little, Brown 2003. Can you follow? Now that the trace is fainter in the sand?… Try sleeping with the dancers in your room……………………………...Jack Bruce (1971) Part of the enchantment surrounding C.G. Jung seems to be that many people want to find out about him and some others are prepared to oblige them with the occasional weighty tome about his life and times from a particular point of view. Read, unread, or dipped into at random, these texts over the years have built up a Jung mythos, appropriate in some ways for such a controversial and influential man. An adequate history of Jung the person seems hard to grasp. His own, rather mixed contribution to the field, contained within Memories, Dreams, Reflections has an undeserved autobiography status, but still sells as such. Other authors have set out to honour a valued guide (Barbara Hannah, 1976), explain his ideas and life together (Anthony Stevens), left the whole thing as a myth (Marie-Louise von Franz) or psychoanalyse him, thus finding him wanting (Ronald Hayman). There are many more besides, particularly if you read Jung's Freudian and other antagonists. The only Australian review I've located of Deirdre Bair's opus, by Helen Elliott, stops dead at one point in some bewilderment that Jung is taken seriously, as all those Freudian claims must be right, notwithstanding that the book she's writing on carries on an extensive investigation of those issues that seem carefully thought out and well researched.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Jung, New York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani
    Copyrighted Material IntroductIon: Jung, neW York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani September 28, 1912. the New York Times featured a full-page inter- view with Jung on the problems confronting america, with a por- trait photo entitled “america facing Its Most tragic Moment”— the first prominent feature of psychoanalysis in the Times. It was Jung, the Times correctly reported, who “brought dr. freud to the recognition of the older school of psychology.” the Times went on to say, “[H]is classrooms are crowded with students eager to under- stand what seems to many to be an almost miraculous treatment. His clinics are crowded with medical cases which have baffled other doctors, and he is here in america to lecture on his subject.” Jung was the man of the hour. aged thirty-seven, he had just com- pleted a five-hundred-page magnum opus, Transformations and Sym‑ bols of the Libido, the second installment of which had just appeared in print. following his first visit to america in 1909, it was he, and not freud, who had been invited back by Smith ely Jelliffe to lec- ture on psychoanalysis in the new international extension course in medicine at fordham university, where he would also be awarded his second honorary degree (others invited included the psychiatrist William alanson White and the neurologist Henry Head). Jung’s initial title for his lectures was “Mental Mechanisms in Health and disease.” By the time he got to composing them, the title had become simply “the theory of Psychoanalysis.” Jung com- menced his introduction to the lectures by indicating that he in- tended to outline his attitude to freud’s guiding principles, noting that a reader would likely react with astonishment that it had taken him ten years to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Spiritual Implications of Synchronistic Experiences
    PUTTING THE SINN BACK INTO SYNCHRONICITY: SOME SPIRITUAL IMPLICATIONS OF SYNCHRONISTIC EXPERIENCES DR RODERICK MAIN Introduction I ought to begin by apologising to anyone I may have lured to read this paper under false pretences. The word ‘Sinn’ in the title is not a spelling mistake, and I regret that I have nothing novel to contribute on the subject of vice and wickedness. Sinn, spelt with a capital ‘s’ and two ‘n’s and pronounced as though the ‘s’ were a ‘z’, is a German word for ‘meaning’; it appears in the phrase ‘sinnvolle koinzidenz’, ‘meaningful coincidence’, which is C. G. Jung’s (1875-1961) most succinct definition of his concept of synchronicity. 1 A slightly fuller definition of synchronicity, which will be clarified and amply illustrated in what follows, is that it is the meaningful acausal paralleling of events, usually of an inner psychic event with an outer physical event .2 A simple example is where one is thinking intensely about an obscure subject such as the alleged mystical significance of a certain number sequence, then, unable to pursue these thoughts any further, one switches on the radio to relax, only to find that one is listening to an unscheduled and illuminating discussion of precisely this subject. Here, the psychic event of one’s intense thoughts and the physical event of hearing the discussion on the radio obviously parallel each other in a way which is likely to strike one as meaningful, yet neither of the events can have caused the other in any normal sense. In discussions of such experiences, attention usually focuses either on the improbability of the paralleling between the events or on the certainty with which a normal causal relationship between the events can be ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • On Symbols and Shadows: Flannery O'connor's Jungian Concepts of Grace Joshlin Sheridan
    Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 12 12-15-2017 On Symbols and Shadows: Flannery O'Connor's Jungian Concepts of Grace Joshlin Sheridan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Sheridan, Joshlin (2017) "On Symbols and Shadows: Flannery O'Connor's Jungian Concepts of Grace," Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism: Vol. 10 : Iss. 2 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion/vol10/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. On Symbols and Shadows Flannery O’Connor’s Jungian Concept of Grace Joshlin Sheridan While participating in a literary circle discussing whether or not the Catholic Eucharist was purely symbolic, the fiery Flannery O’Connor famously responded, “Well, if it’s a symbol, to hell with it!” (Habit 125). O’Connor, a deeply devout Catholic, reveals through her short stories and personal letters a strong desire to prevent religion from becoming merely symbolic or explainable phenomena. Especially frightening to her was the notion that psychology would replace religion, because she viewed psychology as “not an adequate instrument for understanding the religious encounter” (Mystery and Manners 165). In a June 1962 letter, she expressed disdain that the modern world would “gradually . turn religion into poetry and therapy” (Habit 479).
    [Show full text]
  • Catriona Helen Miller
    Vlood Spirits A cjungian Approach to the Vampire JKyth Catriona Helen Miller Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Stirling Stirling Scotland December 1998 r., 4. , Dedication To my parents, Irene and Jack Miller, without whom.... For all the support, guidance and encouragement above and beyond the call of parental duty. Your many favours can never be repaid. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. John Izod for the skillful and unfailingly tactful supervision of this thesis, and for the companionshipon the j ourney. To Lari, for the chair; the commas and comments;the perpetual phone calls; and for going to Santa Cruz with me all those years ago. To everybody in the Late Late Service for sustenanceof various kinds. And everyone else who asked about my thesis and then listened to the answer without flinching. I also acknowledge the kind financial support of the Glasgow Society for Sons and Daughters of Ministers of the Church of Scotland, and, of course, my parents. Contents Page Acknowlegements i Abstract .v INTRODUCTION PART ONE APPROACH & CONTEXT 10 " The Study of Myth & the Cartesian/Newtonian Framework 11 " The Advent of Psychology 13 " Freud & the Vampire Myth 17 " Beyond Descartes & Newton: the New Paradigm 21 " Jung & the New Model 24 " Archetypes & the Collective Unconscious 31 " The Study of Myth After Freud & Jung 35 The Vampire Myth 40 " I " Jung & the Vampire Myth 41 " Symbols: A Jungian Definition 44 PART TWO ENCOUNTERS WITH SHADOW VAMPIRES 49 " Folklore & Fiction 49 " The Vampire in Folklore 51 " Vampirý Epidemics? 54 " The Shadow Archetype 57 " The Dead 58 " The Living Dead 61 " The Shadow Vampire in the Twentieth Century 65 " Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror (Dir: F.
    [Show full text]
  • Archetype/ Symbol in the Psychology of CG Jung Free Ebook
    COMPLEX/ ARCHETYPE/ SYMBOL IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF C.G. JUNG DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Jolande Jacobi, Ralph Manheim | 256 pages | 21 Apr 1971 | Princeton University Press | 9780691017747 | English | New Jersey, United States Jungian archetypes The existence Complex/ Archetype/ Symbol in the Psychology of C.G. Jung the instincts Complex/ Archetype/ Symbol in the Psychology of C.G. Jung no more be proved than the existence of the archetypes, so long as they do not manifest themselves concretely. Wow, I really liked this - the first half was very informative, and quite helpful in understanding the concepts she is expounding on, but appropriately simple, and the second half - which is really a seperate work - is the interpretation of one particularly meaningful dream - in a beautifully composed and deeply touching way - a very good read. As well, Complex/ Archetype/ Symbol in the Psychology of C.G. Jung first two people function as each other's anima and animustheir romantic love serving to make each other psychologically complete. The mother, we know, frequently knows right away, consciously or psychically, that she is now pregnant. One person found this helpful. That is why it lies ready to hand in the unconscious of every man. In the Jungian perspective, therefore, the essence of the complex includes its autonomous psychic existence separate from consciousness and a feeling charge which exerts influence on consciousness. On the contrary, it continues vigorously during the first years of life into adolescence and probably beyond. Jacobi, The Psychology of C. Ken Wilber developed a theory called Spectrum of Consciousness, which expanded the Jungian archetypes.
    [Show full text]