DOCSLIB.ORG

Persuasive Language in Cicero's Pro Milone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Persuasive Language in Cicero's Pro Milone PERSUASIVE LANGUAGE IN CICERO’S PRO MILONE BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 121 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON PERSUASIVE LANGUAGE IN CICERO’S PRO MILONE: A CLOSE READING AND COMMENTARY LYNN S. FOTHERINGHAM INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image is by Matt Brooker. © Matt Brooker 2013. All rights reserved. First published in print in 2013 This PDF edition published in 2017 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-68-0 (2017 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781905670680 ISBN: 978-1-905670-48-2 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of Lynn Fotheringham to be identified as the author of the work published here has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies For Matt, sine quo nihil. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Introduction – how to use this book xi Essay on approach: reading style for substance 1 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Trial, text, commentary 1 1.2. Historical issues 5 1.3. Style and close reading 14 2. The structure of the text 19 2.1. General principles 19 2.1.1. A note on paragraphs and sections 25 2.2. Rhetorical theory 26 2.3. ‘Topic’ and the Topic-Sentence 32 2.3.1. Topic-sentences and existing structural analyses 39 3. Style 41 3.1. General principles 41 3.2. Syntax and complexity 45 3.2.1. A note on ‘Periodicity’ and other terminology 49 3.3. Complexity and structure 52 3.3.1. Complexity and existing structural analyses 61 4. Vocabulary 62 4.1. General principles 62 4.2. Vocabulary and structure 69 4.2.1. Vocabulary distribution and existing structural analyses 76 5. Interaction 77 5.1. Shifts in speaker and addressee 77 5.2. Speakers, addressees and structure 81 6. Conclusion 84 Text 85 Commentary 109 Bibliography 401 Indices 405 vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book has taken a long time to write. There are, no doubt, many reasons for this; but one of the most significant must surely be my diagnosis, in autumn 2000, with clinical depression. I have two motivations for mentioning this. The first is my belief that we still draw an unwarranted distinction between the so-called ‘mental’ and ‘physical’ illnesses, and that one important response to this situation on the part of those who suffer from the former is to be more open about their experiences. Over the last thirteen years I have seen numerous students suffering from depression who, because of the stigma still sometimes attached to mental illness, feel unable to acknowledge the situation and seek appropriate help. But acknowledgement and help are both vital. The impact of depression on my life and work has been immeasurable, but neither has been destroyed; the book has, finally, got written. My second motivation is a desire to thank a variety of people for their support. Firstly, numerous healthcare professionals: Felicity Armitage, J. D. Dornan, M. Hussain, Matthew Mills, Heather Nelson, Lindsey Rogers, Sharon Sharp. Secondly, my Department, School, University and Union (especially successive Heads of Department, Steve Hodkinson, Doug Lee, Judith Mossman, John Rich, Betine Van Zyl Smit; then, among many others, Mike Byrne, Karen Cox, Julian Henderson, Harprit Samrai, Beverley Szatter, Gemma Tovey). On a more traditional note, I have many to thank on the academic side. My interest in the language and structure of Cicero’s speeches goes back to John Richardson’s inspiring undergraduate class on the Pro Caelio in Edinburgh, many years ago. John has remained a steady source of encouragement and comment through all the intervening years. This interest eventually produced an Oxford doctorate, supportively supervised first by Michael Winterbottom and then by Chris Pelling, to both of whom I owe more than I can say. I also received valuable input while at Oxford from Angus Bowie, Brian Hainsworth and Doreen Innes; and I should acknowledge specifically that I was first alerted to the potential usefulness of Discourse Analysis, after a seminar-paper I had given on internal closure, by the late Don Fowler. I must also thank my thesis examiners, Dominic Berry and Christina Kraus, for their penetrating insights. This is not the book of the thesis, but the thesis underlies the book. Over the years I have received support and encouragement, as well as insight, from many Ciceronians (and others!) met at seminars and conferences. If I were to attempt to list them, I would be bound to forget someone. I must single out Jonathan Powell, whose faith in my work has been demonstrated time and again since I was a doctoral student, and Jaap Wisse, with whom I have had many an enjoyable and simultaneously thought-provoking discussion; I would also like to thank Robert Morstein-Marx for supportive comments about the book at a very late stage in its development. Colleagues at Nottingham who have commented on my work despite lack of interest in Cicero per se deserve particular thanks: Patrick Finglass, Katharina Lorenz, Helen Lovatt, Alan Sommerstein. Work for the book was carried out in a variety of places, including the National Library of Scotland and the libraries of the Universities of Vienna, Edinburgh and Thessaloniki as well as Nottingham. ix x CICERO PRO MILONE Doreen Innes must be thanked again for facilitating visits to the Bodleian and Sackler with innumerable opportunities to house- and cat-sit in Oxford. I must thank Mike Edwards and John North at the Institute of Classical Studies for committing to publish the work and for their comments on it, as well as Richard Simpson and Gemma Watson for their hard work in preparing the manuscript. In Nottingham, Danielle Frisby, Will Leveritt, Mike Welbourn, and Nick Wilshere all contributed to the tedious and thankless work of checking the Indices. Finally, it is impossible to express how much I owe to Catherine Steel. From the time we were doctoral students together in the 90s her existence as a contemporary Ciceronian has made me feel less alone, and since then she has been my most constant consultant through innumerable drafts and lengthy telephone calls. And now to the personal, where brevity must not be taken as a sign that the gratitude is any the less heartfelt. My parents’ patience has been infinite. Friends (other than those already mentioned) are too many to list; but I single out those who contributed to making my stay in Thessaloniki in 2009-10, when the project at long last really came together, so enjoyable and productive: Georgia Bergidou, Litsa Tsopanoglou, and their families. In the process of compiling and checking the Indices and Tables, life was made more bearable by the music of Guy Clark, the Dixie Chicks, Steve Earle, Nanci Griffith and (of course) Emmylou Harris. Last but not least, my debt to my partner, Matt Brooker, is stated in the dedication; further verbiage would add nothing. INTRODUCTION – HOW TO USE THIS BOOK This book presents a close reading of Cicero’s Pro Milone in order, first, to support the view that that text can be read as a unified whole, and second, to demonstrate an approach to the question – which could also be applied to other texts – of what impact style can have on the substance or meaning of a text. Cicero is an author for whom this question is particularly important and difficult, due to his key position both as supplier of evidence for events in the last years of the Republic, and in the development of Latin prose literature: the highly worked nature of his language can make it difficult to evaluate the evidence that he provides (as well as, sometimes, making it just difficult to read), while the intensely political nature of his work makes it difficult to judge its literary quality. The problem is particularly acute in the explicitly persuasive context of the speeches: the picture of the world he presents in these texts may not conform precisely to anything that could be described as historical truth, but it is a picture of whose truth he was attempting to persuade his audience. An extraordinary ability to use language to this end, often successfully even if the success was not lasting, is the hallmark of his entire career; understanding that career, and the world in which it could take shape, is therefore impossible without a thorough explanation of his use of language: how the way he said things (style) affected what his audience understood him to have said, and what they believed (substance). The assumption throughout is that style is not mere decoration added to substance, but affects how that substance is understood: expression creates an impression. While the most likely readership for this work consists of Latin scholars already familiar with the Pro Milone, along with those working on Latin linguistics more generally, it is hoped that other constituencies will also find here something to interest them: historians of the late republic; those with an interest in rhetoric, stylistics, or discourse analysis/text linguistics; and Latin students. Different readers will find different parts of the book useful. It is therefore worth stating immediately what the book does and does not contain. Readers will find here: o an essay on the approach taken, ‘Reading Style for Substance’;1 o a re-punctuated and re-paragraphed version of Clark’s 1900 OCT text of the speech; o a sentence-by-sentence Commentary; o Lexical and Syntactic Indices (as well as the usual Thematic Index).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cicero's Life
    Cicero Philippic II Cicero’s Life Lives of Cicero of all lengths and depths abound; what follows is intended to highlight the main landmarks in Cicero’s career. A separate table chronicles the events of 44 BC in more detail. Date (BC) Cicero and his circle Rome 107 Marius elected consul for the first time 106 Birth of Marcus Tullius Cicero and Gnaeus Pompeius (Pompey), later called ‘Magnus’; both equestrians. 104 – 100 Marius consul for five successive years. 104/2 Birth of Cicero’s brother, Quintus. 90s Cicero is educated at Rome in house of L. Licinius Crassus and later continues his studies with the augur Q. Mucius Scaevola. 91 – 88 Cicero and Pompey both serve under The Social War, in which Rome’s Sulla, Pompey as a successful Italian allies fight against Rome’s general. predominance and win citizenship. 88 – 84 Occupation of Rome first by Sulla (88) and then by Marius and Cinna (87 – 6). Marius dies in 86, Cinna continues to control affairs until his death in 84. ?86 Cicero writes a rhetorical treatise, de Inventione. 82 Sulla marches on Rome and is made dictator. Proscriptions follow (in 81). He retires from office in 79 and dies in 78. Date (BC) Cicero and his circle Rome 81 Cicero’s first civil case, pro Quinctio Sulla’s reforms curtailing powers of (which he probably loses). tribunate, increasing size of senate and constituting seven senatorial courts. 80 Cicero’s first criminal case, pro Roscio Amerino (which he wins). 79 – 77 Cicero marries Terentia and travels abroad, including to Athens for six months to study rhetoric under Apollonius Molo.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Tullius Cicero, on Old Age (De Senectute) [44 BC]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Marcus Tullius Cicero, On Old Age (De Senectute) [44 BC] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • SPEECH in DEFENCE of TITUS ANNIUS MILO Marcus Tullius Cicero
    52 BC SPEECH IN DEFENCE OF TITUS ANNIUS MILO Marcus Tullius Cicero translated by Charles Duke Yonge, A.B. Cicero, Marcus Tullius (106-43 BC) - Rome’s greatest orator, philosopher, and rhetorician, he developed a style of speaking that was emulated for centuries thereafter. Cicero was influential in the development of Latin as more than just a utilitarian language. Speech in Defence of Titus Annius Milo (52 BC) - Milo, a candidate for consulship, and Clodius, a candidate for the praetorship, were in- volved in a streetfight in which Clodius was slain. Milo was tried for his murder. THE ARGUMENT Titus Annius Milo, often in the following speech called only Titus Annius, stood for the consulship while Clodius was a candidate for the praetorship, and daily quarrels took place in the streets between their armed retainers and gladiators. Milo, who was dictator of Lanuvium, his native place, was forced to go thither to appoint some priests, etc.; and Clodius, who had been to Africa, met him on his road. Milo was in his carriage with his wife, and was accompanied by a numerous retinue, among whom were some gladiators. Clodius was on horseback, with about thirty armed men. The followers of each began to fight, and when the tumult had become general, Clodius was slain, probably by Milo himself. The disturbances at Rome became so formidable that Pompey was created sole consul; and soon after he entered on his office, A.U.C. 702, Milo was brought to trial. This speech, however, though composed by Cicero, was not spoken, for he was so much alarmed by the violence of Clodius’s friends, that he did not dare to use the plain language he had proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • BELVEDERE Titus Annius Milo Védelmében1
    2009/XXI. 3–4. BELVEDEREMERIDIONALE 65 SZemTanú MARCUS TULL I US CI C E RO Titus Annius Milo védelmében1 Fordította és jegyzetekkel ellátta Nótári Tamás I. (1) Noha attól tartok, bírák, hogy tolong körülöttünk, azon őrségek, amelyeket szégyenteljes, hogy egy hős férfi védelmé- minden templom előtt láttok – noha ezeket ben félve kezdjek beszélni,2 és legkevésbé erőszak elhárítására állítottak fel, mégis sem helyénvaló, hogy magát az állam sorsa olyan hatást keltenek, hogy mind a forumon, jobban aggasztja T. Anniust, mint a sajátja, mind a törvényszék előtt, ha hasznos és én azonban nem tudok ezen ügyhöz kellően szükséges, hogy az őrség oltalma vett körül, emelkedett lélekkel viszonyulni – eme szo- valamiképpen félelemmel szabadulunk meg katlan jellegű bíráskodás szorongással tölt félelmünktől. Ha úgy gondolnám, hogy el, hiszen bármerre is fordítsam tekintetemet, Milo ellen állították fel őket, meghajolnék a hiába keresem a régi forumi hagyományokat körülmények előtt, bírák, mert nem hinném, és a bíráskodás ősi rendjét. (2) Ugyanis – a hogy ilyen nagy fegyveres erő mellett helye szokástól eltérően – nem a polgárok gyűrűje volna a szónoklásnak. Bátorít, és megerősít öleli körül üléseteket, nem a szokott sokaság azonban a bölcs és igazságos Cn. Pompeius Szemtanú 66 BELVEDEREMERIDIONALE 2009/XXI. 3–4. döntése, hiszen nem tartaná összeegyeztet- erényetek és bölcsességetek által végre meg- hetőnek sem igazságérzetével, hogy egy bírói szabaduljunk a gyalázatos polgárok hosszas ítélet alatt álló vádlottat kiszolgáltasson a ka- zaklatásaitól. (5)
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Milone: the Purposes of Cicero’S Published Defense Of
    PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE (Under the Direction of James C. Anderson, Jr.) ABSTRACT This thesis explores the trial of T. Annius Milo for the murder of P. Clodius Pulcher, which occurred in Rome in 52 BC, and the events leading up to it, as well as Marcus Tullius Cicero’s defense of Milo and his later published version of that defense. The thesis examines the purposes for Cicero’s publication of the speech because Cicero failed to acquit his client, and yet still published his defense. Before specifically examining Cicero’s goals for his publication, this thesis considers relationships between the parties involved in the trial, as well as the conflicting accounts of the murder; it then observes the volatile events and novel procedure surrounding the trial; and it also surveys the unusual topographic setting of the trial. Finally, this thesis considers the differences between the published speech and the speech delivered at trial, the timing of its publication, and possible political and philosophical purposes. INDEX WORDS: Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Milone, Titus Annius Milo, Publius Clodius Pulcher, Pompey, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Roman Courts, Roman Trials, Roman Criminal Procedure, Ancient Criminal Procedure, Roman Rhetoric, Latin Rhetoric, Ancient Rhetoric, Roman Speeches, Roman Defense Speeches, Roman Topography, Roman Forum, Roman Philosophy, Roman Stoicism, Roman Natural Law, Roman Politics PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE B.A. Philosophy, Georgia State University, 1995 J.D., University of Georgia, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Robert Christian Rutledge All Rights Reserved PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero-Milo-Lsf-As-Schools.Pdf
    Extracts from Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone Introduction for Teachers The material which follows consists of extracts from a 2013 book published by the Institute of Classical Studies, which will soon be available on-line on an Open Access basis. Access is also here provided to those sections of the book pertaining specifically to the selections from the speech on the current OCR syllabus (H043 & H443), in the hope that the linguistic focus of the work may make it useful for teachers guiding AS & A Level students through the complexities of Ciceronian Latin, even though the work was not originally designed with schools in mind. The main body of the book consists of a sentence-by-sentence analysis of the speech covering gram- matical structure and contribution to argument. This analysis is different in several respects from traditional commentaries, but shares with them a focus on language and on small details. It aims for a consistency in providing some information for every sentence in the text, specifically: • Each sentence is printed in such a way that the syntactic structure is to some extent visible on the page. • The number and type of clauses in each sentence is listed. • Each sentence is paraphrased and/or its function in terms of contribution to the argument is described. Similar consistency has not been attempted in providing comments on individual phrases; those that do appear tend to focus on themes important to the overall argument of the book, such as Cicero’s use of first- and second-person grammatical elements. The purpose of this tightly-focused analysis of language and content was originally, in research terms, to support an argument about the nature of the text which is outlined below.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosopopoeia in Ciceronian Oratory
    Prosopopoeia in Ciceronian Oratory Tyler Broome A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Classics University of Otago March 2021 Abstract This thesis examines the form and function of prosopopoeia in Cicero’s speeches. Prosopopoeia – the rhetorical device in which an orator fabricates and delivers a discourse as another character – offers an alternative to the orator’s own speech for the communication of information and emotion. The most recent study on the device, D.S. Mayfield’s Variants of Rhetorical Ventriloquism, suggests that “it is always significant rhetorically in whose mouth words are being put – at what time, in which context and whose presence, by which means, and (above all) in the interest of what or whom” (Mayfield 2019, 147-148). This study seeks to evaluate Mayfield’s claim in the practice of Ciceronian oratory by examining when Cicero used the device, whom he portrayed, and how the device contributed to his persuasive aims. A preliminary examination of extant rhetorical theory up to and including Quintilian provides context for Cicero’s practice, identifying a range of potential effects the device could enact. Ancient theory also raises several questions about taxonomical distinctions between types of prosopopoeia, which are briefly discussed to further contextualise Cicero’s practice. Following this, eight of Cicero’s speeches are discussed in chronological order: Pro Quinctio; Pro Roscio Amerino; In Verrem 2.5; the First Catilinarian; Pro Caelio; In Pisonem; Pro Plancio; and Pro Milone. Notable prosopopoeiae in these speeches are identified and evaluated in relation to their persuasive effect on the audience, identifying a diverse range of uses for the device such as generating indignation or pity, and the delineation of characters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome
    THE ARGEI: SEX, WAR, AND CRUCIFIXION IN ROME AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Kristan Foust Ewin, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Ewin, Kristan Foust. The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome and the Ancient Near East. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 119 pp., 2 tables, 18 illustrations, bibliography, 150 titles. The purpose of the Roman Argei ceremony, during which the Vestal Virgins harvested made and paraded rush puppets only to throw them into the Tiber, is widely debated. Modern historians supply three main reasons for the purpose of the Argei: an agrarian act, a scapegoat, and finally as an offering averting deceased spirits or Lares. I suggest that the ceremony also related to war and the spectacle of displaying war casualties. I compare the ancient Near East and Rome and connect the element of war and husbandry and claim that the Argei paralleled the sacred marriage. In addition to an agricultural and purification rite, these rituals may have served as sympathetic magic for pre- and inter-war periods. As of yet, no author has proposed the Argei as a ceremony related to war. By looking at the Argei holistically I open the door for a new direction of inquiry on the Argei ceremony, fertility cults in the Near East and in Rome, and on the execution of war criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters of Marcus Tullius Cicero, with His Treatises on Friendship and Old
    1^ THE HARVARD CLASSICS EDITED BY CHARLES W ELIOT LL D LETTERS OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO t It WITH HIS TREATISES ON FRIENDSHIP AND OLD AGE TRANSLATED BY E S SHUCKBURGH AND LETTERS OF GAIUS PLINIUS CAECILTUS SECUNDUS TRANSLATED BY WILLIAM MELMOTH REVISED BY F C T BOSANQUET WITH INTRODUCTIONS, NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 'OR ELIOT'S FIVE-FOOT SHELF OF BOOKS' P F COLLIER & SON NEW YORK 'ilX^ Copyright, By 1909 P. F. CottiEK & Sow PA * CONTENTS PAGE ON FRIENDSHIP 7 Marcus Tullius Cicero ON OLD AGE 45 Marcus Tullius Cicero LETTERS 83 Marcus Tullius Cicero LETTERS 195 Gaius Plinius C^cilius Secundus I —HC IX INTRODUCTORY NOTE Marcus Tullius Cicero, the greatest of Roman orators and the chief master of Latin prose style, was born at Arpinum, Jan. 3, io6 B. C. His father, who was a man of property and belonged to the clas'S of the "Knights," moved to Rome when Cicero was a child; and the future statesman received an elaborate education in rhetoric, law, and philosophy, studying and practising under some of the most noted teachers of the time. He began his career as an advocate at the age of twenty-five, and almost immediately came to be recognised not only as a man of brilliant talents but also as a courageous upholder of justice in the face of grave political danger. After two years of practice he left Rome to travel in Greece and Asia, taking all the opportunities that offered to study his art under distinguished masters. He returned to Rome greatly improved in health and in professional skill, and in 76 B.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5w54r8pb Author Evans, Jennifer Marilyn Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy By Jennifer Marilyn Evans A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor J. Theodore Peña, Chair Professor Christopher Hallett Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Nicola Terrenato Professor Carlos Noreña Spring 2014 Copyright 2014, Jennifer Marilyn Evans Abstract Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy by Jennifer Marilyn Evans Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor J. Theodore Peña, Chair This dissertation examines the evidence for burial in archaic Rome and Latium with a view to understanding the nature of urban development in the region. In particular, I focus on identifying those social and political institutions that governed relations between city‐ states at a time when Rome was becoming the most influential urban center in the area. I examine the evidence for burial gathered primarily from the past four decades or so of archaeological excavation in order to present first, a systematic account of the data and second, an analysis of these materials. I reveal that a high degree of variation was observed in funerary ritual across sites, and suggest that this points to a complex system of regional networks that allowed for the widespread travel of people and ideas.
    [Show full text]