TLS Action Plan 2017 – 20
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes -
Please Enter Name Here
Audit and Risk Annual Sustainability Report for the Year Ended 31st March 2018. Distribution The Audit & Risk Committee The Executive Board The NAO The Board of Trustees Issued: May 2018 Andrew Favell (Health, Safety and Environment Adviser) Sustainability Report 2017/18 1. Basis of Opinion The overall rating remains as Good, as the various reports that have been collected on all of our key sustainability themes have improved year on year. 2. Sustainability Strategy A sustainability strategy has been developed and agreed in 2017/18 with key stakeholders across HRP Directorates to further focus on six key areas of sustainability, with a sponsor on the Executive Board. Regular sustainability group meetings are being held to embed the strategy into the organisation and an agenda item for sustainability will remain on the quarterly local Fire, Health and Safety Committee meetings. 3. Conserve Water This year saw a 3% decrease in water consumption at HRP. All sites continue the progress that has been made over the years, and which is now supported by regular environmental audit and impact assessments for all HRP sites. Initiatives have included: The installation of automated meter readings across the main palaces; which has enabled close monitoring of water leaks and allowed prompt repair. Grey water used at some sites where possible to irrigate and flush some of the public toilets. Some visitor toilets have been fitted with sensor taps The water pressure was reduced at the taps, thereby reducing overall consumption at some sites. Rain water and river water is used for irrigation where possible. Visitor urinals have been fitted with an electrical flow rate controller at some sites. -
Great Western Railway Ships - Wikipedi… Great Western Railway Ships from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
5/20/2011 Great Western Railway ships - Wikipedi… Great Western Railway ships From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Great Western Railway’s ships operated in Great Western Railway connection with the company's trains to provide services to (shipping services) Ireland, the Channel Islands and France.[1] Powers were granted by Act of Parliament for the Great Western Railway (GWR) to operate ships in 1871. The following year the company took over the ships operated by Ford and Jackson on the route between Wales and Ireland. Services were operated between Weymouth, the Channel Islands and France on the former Weymouth and Channel Islands Steam Packet Company routes. Smaller GWR vessels were also used as tenders at Plymouth and on ferry routes on the River Severn and River Dart. The railway also operated tugs and other craft at their docks in Wales and South West England. The Great Western Railway’s principal routes and docks Contents Predecessor Ford and Jackson Successor British Railways 1 History 2 Sea-going ships Founded 1871 2.1 A to G Defunct 1948 2.2 H to O Headquarters Milford/Fishguard, Wales 2.3 P to R 2.4 S Parent Great Western Railway 2.5 T to Z 3 River ferries 4 Tugs and work boats 4.1 A to M 4.2 N to Z 5 Colours 6 References History Isambard Kingdom Brunel, the GWR’s chief engineer, envisaged the railway linking London with the United States of America. He was responsible for designing three large ships, the SS Great Western (1837), SS Great Britain (1843; now preserved at Bristol), and SS Great Eastern (1858). -
London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green -
A Multi-Objective Ensemble Approach to Hydrological Modelling in the UK: an Application to Historic Drought Reconstruction
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-3 Manuscript under review for journal Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discussion started: 15 January 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. A Multi-Objective Ensemble Approach to Hydrological Modelling in the UK: An Application to Historic Drought Reconstruction Katie A. Smith1, Lucy J. Barker1, Maliko Tanguy1, Simon Parry1, Shaun Harrigan2, Tim P. Legg3, Christel Prudhomme2,1,4, and Jamie Hannaford1,5 5 1 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK 2 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Road, Reading, RG2 9AX, UK 3 Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, UK 4 Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK 10 5 Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS, Department of Geography, Maynooth, Ireland Correspondence to: Katie A Smith ([email protected]) Abstract. Hydrological models can provide estimates of streamflow pre- and post- observations, which enable greater understanding of past hydrological behaviour, and potential futures. In this paper, a new multi-objective calibration method was derived and tested for 303 catchments in the UK, and the calibrations were used to reconstruct river flows back to 1891, 15 in order to provide a much longer view of past hydrological variability, given the brevity of most UK river flow records which began post-1960. A Latin Hypercube sample of 500,000 parameterisations for the GR4J model for each catchment were evaluated against six evaluation metrics covering all aspects of the flow regime from high, median and low flows. -
Village Plan – Hampton
HAMPTON Draft Supplementary Planning Document I March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Planning Policy and Wider Context 3. Spatial Context 4. Vision for Hampton 5. Objectives 6. Character Area Assessments Character Area 1: Longford River Estates Character Area 2: Queenswood Avenue Estate and west of Hanworth Road Character Area 3: Gloucester Road and the Ormonds Character Area 4: Hampton Village Conservation Area Character Area 5: Hampton Court Green Conservation Area Character Area 6: Hampton Court Park Conservation Area CharacterArea 7: Platt’s Eyot Conservation Area Character Area 8: Hampton Waterworks Character Area 9: Oldfield Road Character Area 10: Priory Road West Character Area 11: Priory Road East and Surroundings Character Area 12: Oak Avenue Estates Character Area 13: Hanworth Road Conservation Area 7. Features and Materials 8. Guidance for Development Sites 9. Shop Front Guidance 10. Forecourt Parking 11. Flood Risk Appendix 1: Relevant Policies and Guidance 1. Introduction The purpose of this Village Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning The London Borough of Richmond Document (SPD) is primarily to establish upon Thames has been divided into a vision and planning policy aims for the a series of smaller village areas. area, in light of existing and emerging Each village is distinctive in terms of Local Plan policy. The SPD intends the community, facilities and local character – as are many sub areas to define, maintain and enhance the within the villages. character of Hampton, and to provide guidance in this regard. The SPD forms The villages of the London Borough part of the wider Village Plan. Richmond upon Thames are attractive with many listed buildings By identifying key features of the village, and Conservation Areas, the local the SPD clarifies the most important character of each being unique, aspects and features that contribute to recognisable and important to the local character to guide those seeking community and to the aesthetic of to make changes to their properties or the borough as a whole. -
Hampton Village Consultation Material
Hampton Village INTRODUCTION TO VILLAGE PLANNING GUIDANCE FOR HAMPTON What is Village Planning Guidance? How can I get involved? London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (LBRuT) wants residents and businesses to help prepare ‘Village Planning There will be two different stages of engagement and consultation Guidance’ for the Hampton Village area. This will be a before the guidance is adopted. document that the Council considers when deciding on planning During February and March residents and businesses are being asked applications. Village Planning Guidance can: about their vision for the future of their area, thinking about: • Help to identify what the ‘local character’ of your area is and • the local character what features need to be retained. • heritage assets • Help protect and enhance the local character of your area, • improvement opportunities for specific sites or areas particularly if it is not a designated ‘Conservation Area’. • other planning policy or general village plan issues • Establish key design principles that new development should respond to. Draft guidance will be developed over the summer based on your views and a formal (statutory) consultation carried out in late The boundary has been based on the Village Plan area to reflect summer/autumn 2016 before adoption later in the year. the views of where people live, as well as practical considerations to support the local interpretation of planning policy. How does Village Planning Guidance work? How does the ‘Village Planning Guidance’ relate to Village Plans? The Village Planning Guidance will become a formal planning policy ‘Supplementary Planning Document’ (SPD) which The Planning Guidance builds on the ‘Village Plans’ which were the Council will take account of when deciding on planning developed from the 2010 ‘All in One’ survey results, and from ongoing applications, so it will influence developers and householders consultation, including through the engagement events currently in preparing plans and designs. -
What's Happening on the M4 Project During January?
Upgrade to smart motorway Junction 3 to 12 January 2019 news bulletin Happy New Year and welcome to the first monthly information bulletin of 2019. This year will see a step up in the project as we move forward with bridges and structures work and prepare for the start of phase 2 of construction between Junctions 8/9 at Maidenhead and Junction 3 at Hayes. Our public engagement for this year is currently being organised. In March and April 2019 we will be holding the next set of Public Information Events for areas between junctions 8/9 to 3. Watch this space for information about these in the next bulletin. We are now moving into the new office and compound near Junction 10 which recently finished construction. The new compound will allow us to store the vast majority of our equipment and materials and reduce the need for large local compounds. It will also provide space for vehicle rescue and recovery facilities for users of the M4. What’s happening on the M4 project during January? Phase two of construction starts in 2019 M4 overnight closures during January Phase one of the project started in July 2018 and There are several overnight full closures (usually 22:00 comprises the area west from Junctions 8/9 leading to to 05:00) currently planned in January. The best way to Junction 12. While this is a significant piece of work in keep up to date with the various closures, including slip itself, phase two covering Junctions 8/9 eastwards into road closures, is the Traffic England website at: London and Junction 3 is a much more complex www.trafficengland.com. -
5406 Green Infrastructure Open Space
COTSWOLD DISTRICT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE OPEN SPACE AND PLAY SPACE STRATEGY 201 Open Spaces 4 There is considered to be three main Green Corridors in Fairford, 1) River Coln, 2) Pitman Brook and 3) the PROW from town to lake 104Fairford is well served with PROW and permissive paths, many of which are kept in good condition. There are areas of the footpath along the Coln that are in a state of disrepair and require urgent action to stop the bank from further degeneration. Lovers Walk requires resurfacing. Typology Quantity & Size Accessibility Quality Summary Green Corridors 1) Mix of PROW, 1) Mix of PROW, Essential - All are clean permissive path & permissive path & private. and litter free 1) River private. Coln 2) Permissive Path (closed E - (1) has clearly defined 2) Permissive Path every Tuesday) footpaths with a level 2) Pitman (closed every Tuesday) surface (2) & (3) defined Brook 3)Public access footpath, but not level. 3)Public access 3) PROW from E - All have nature features Path the town to lake 104 Desirable - All have appropriate signage D - All sites don't have multiple use, only walking D - All have no dog/litter bins X - (1) has disabled access in places (2) & (3) not X - 1, 2 & 3 have staff or volunteer involvement. Total amount of accessible space 17,728 metres Total amount of accessible space within 2 KM 17,728 metres (includes Public Rights of Way with 2 KM radius) Total amount of accessible space within 300m NA Findings Green Corridors Quantity and Accessibility: There is no requirement to set catchments for green corridors due to their linear nature. -
Getting to Know Your River
Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go.. -
Final Report
On the right path: Options for a body to aid future management of the English National Trails Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority on behalf of the National Trails Alliance Final Report Red Kite Environment Craggattak Consulting Caroline Butlin-Worrall March 2019 On the right path: Options for a body to aid future management of the English National Trails ______________________________________________ Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority on behalf of the National Trails Alliance Caroline Butlin-Worrall Red Kite Environment Pearcroft Pearcroft Rd Stonehouse Gloucestershire GL10 2JY Tel: 01453 822013 Email: [email protected] Cover photo: Hadrian’s Wall National Trail, Hadrian’s Wall Country On the Right Path: Options for a body to aid future management of the English National Trails Contents Summary ................................................................................................ i 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 2 How the study was carried out .......................................................... 2 3 Background to National Trails .......................................................... 3 3.1 The National Trails ............................................................................................ 3 3.2 The England Coast Path (ECP) and Wales Coast Path (WCP) ........................ 4 3.3 Trail officers’ range of work ............................................................................... 4 3.4 National Trail -
Autumn 2010 Hon
Weybridge Society Your Residents’ Association – Working to keep Weybridge a green and pleasant place to live Autumn 2010 Hon. Patron - Michael Aspel, OBE Would you like to join To Join the Weybridge Society? By joining us you will be able to add your voice and weight to our campaigns. The Society has been going for over 50 years and during that time has gained the respect of borough and county councillors. We support new initiatives and guard against inappropriate development. We also work closely with Neighbourhood Watch and the police to ensure a safe and secure environment for all who live and work in Weybridge. Please contact any member listed on Page 2 for details Mr Philip Hammond Councillor John Margaret Hicks, Chair The Next Meeting of the Weybridge Society MP, Secretary of State O'Reilly, Leader Elmbridge Local will be held on for Transport Elmbridge Council Committee WEDNESDAY, 13 OCTOBER, 2010 Transport Panel meet at 8 p.m. in the hall of the Catholic Church Christ The Prince with MP and councillors of Peace, N FRIDAY 23rd July and the Transport and Planning Portmore Park Road, 2010, Committee Panels. Weybridge members of the We discussed the long term needs (please note the different venue Weybridge Society for the town's transport infrastruc- compared to recent meetings) met with our elected ture, based on the Society Transport representatives and officers from Panel presentation to the AGM. All The Speaker will be OSurrey and Elmbridge to discuss the recognised that current financial INSPECTOR STEVE Society's views on a the need for a constraints will restrict expenditure transport infrastructure vision for the in the short term but that economic CHEESEMAN next 20 years, against which shorter conditions will change and we need of Surrey Police term strategies such as the Local to know what we want for the town Development Plan and Local in the medium to longer term.