DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial and Statutory Trends in the Law of Adoption Sanford N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judicial and Statutory Trends in the Law of Adoption Sanford N Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers October 1962 Judicial and Statutory Trends in the Law of Adoption Sanford N. Katz Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Contracts Commons, Family Law Commons, and the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Sanford N. Katz. "Judicial and Statutory Trends in the Law of Adoption." Georgetown Law Journal 51, (1962): 64-95. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JUDICIAL AND STATUTORY TRENDS IN THE LAW OF ADOPTION SANFORD N. KATZ* In this analysis of the recent developments in American adoption laws, the author emphasizes the complexity of the adoption process and its tradi- tional concern for the welfare of the child. Utilizing the model adoption legislation recently drafted by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare as a guide, Professor Katz indicates that the modern tendency is toward greater recognition of the need for safeguarding the interests of all of the parties to an adoption proceeding. INTRODUCTION Today, adoption is not only the juridical act creating certain civil rela- tions between two persons; it is also a social process. The social implica- tions are based upon the fact that the history of adoption in the United States is part of the history of child welfare and particularly of the treat- ment of the dependent child.' Because of this emphasis on the child and his well-being, in recent years the American approach has placed continually greater emphasis upon the interrelationship between the legal and the social problems involved in this area. With this in mind, this article will undertake to analyze some of the similarities and differences between adoption laws in the United States, using, as a point of reference, a single modern statute thought to be a guide to enlightened legislation-An Act for the Adoption of Children,2 drafted by the Children's Bureau of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Throughout the course of this article reference will also be made to the Act's companion statute, An Act for Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship; 3 for the drafters of the Model Adoption Act envisioned a "package plan"--4.e., that states would adopt the Model Adoption Act and the Model Termination Act * Assistant Professor of Law, The Law School, Catholic University of America; A.B., Boston University; J.D., University of Chicago. I See Thurston, The Dependent Child (1930). For an interesting account of the treat- ment of orphans and adopted children in nineteenth century America see Clothier, Some Aspects of the Problem of Adoption, 9 Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 598 (1939). 2 Children's Bureau, U.S. Dep't of Health, Education, and Welfare, Legislative Guides for the Termination of Parental Rights and Responsibilities and the Adoption of Children 49 (1961) [hereinafter referred to as the Model Adoption Act (MAA)]. 3 Children's Bureau, U.S. Dep't of Health, Education, and Welfare, op. cit. supra note 2, at 37 [hereinafter referred to as the Model Termination Act (MTA)]. LAW Or ADOPTION together. Finally, in discussing these two acts in relation to the existing law of the different states, some attempt will be made to evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages inherent in the various posi- tions. By so doing, it is hoped that all the considerations, both social and legal, which surround the adoption proceeding will be brought to the attention of all those concerned with this important area of the law. PREREQUISITES TO ADOPTION Before discussing the substantive problems involved in an adoption, it seems necessary to turn our attention to the preliminary matter of pre- requisites to the adoption proceeding. Especially important are two pre- requisites which have been advocated over the years.4 These are (1) that in a nonrelative adoption, the placement must be made by a licensed social service agency, and (2) that a judicial proceeding to terminate the rights of the natural parents in the child must antedate the petition for adoption. It is in satisfying these prerequisites that the Model Adoption Act and its companion statute best exemplify the meeting of the realms of law and the social sciences. THE REQUIREMENT OF AGENCY PLACEMENTS Turning to the first of the above-mentioned requirements, section 6 of the Model Adoption Act provides that except for the related adoption5 no adoption petition will be entertained unless "the child sought to be adopted has [first] been placed for adoption with the petitioners by a child placement agency." This type of "agency placement" is to be con- trasted with a private or independent placement. That kind of placement is exemplified by the private placing of a child by a physician where the physician knows that one of his patients, an unmarried mother, for ex- ample, wants to give up her child for adoption and that another of his patients wishes to adopt a child. His arranging the adoption without resorting to a social service agency for study and investigation would be an independent adoption, or, as it is sometimes called a "private place- ment." The dangers inherent in this latter type are clear and for this reason 4 See, e.g., Poller, Parental Rights-The Need for Law and Social Action (1958); Stevenson, King, Verry & Gallagher, Current Problems in Child Adoption, 24 Postgraduate Medicine 526-28 (1958). 5 A related adoption is usually accomplished without agency involvement at the petition- ling stage. THE GEORGETOWN LAW jOURNAL [Vol. 51: p. 64 such" unregulated adoptions have been widely criticized on the grounds that they foster "black market" adoptions, that they can be arranged for profit,7 and that they can leave both the adoptive and the natural parents unprotected.' Aside from these criticisms, there is the equally important consideration that even "a lawyer who is well equipped to handle the legal aspects of adoption may not be qualified to decide many questions in- cluded in placing a child which properly lie within the realm of specialized social knowledge."9 It is this element of "specialized social knowledge" which, though an advantage of great importance, is generally lacking in independent adoptions, and which section 6 of the Model Adoption Act is designed to secure. The advantages of agency placement are also seen in an investigation of the services provided by such agencies. As intimated previously, the purpose of such services is both to promote the well-being of the child to be adopted, and also to recognize the needs and interests of both the natural and the adoptive parents. The services to the child would take the form of making a study of the child which would include his develop- ment history, his family history, and a medical and psychological examina- tion. In addition, the child would be placed in the home of a suitable adoptive family under the supervision of the agency. Similarly, with regard to the natural parents, casework help would be given to arrive at a decision regarding relinquishment of the child. For example, a social worker would discuss plans for the child, the problem of confidentiality, and preference for the religious upbringing of the child. And if the natural parent is an unmarried mother, specialized serv- ices' would be provided because of the existing social disadvantages for her and her child. Services to the adoptive parents would consist of case- work help, protection, the selection of a child suitable for them if their home can be used, and assistance in completion of legal adoption and 6 See, e.g., Reid, The Role of the Social Agency in Adoption, 20 Pediatrics 369 (1957); Stevenson, King, Verry & Gallagher, supra note 4, at 522, 524-25; Comment, Moppets on the Market: The Problem of Unregulated Adoption, 59 Yale L.J. 715, 729-30 (1950). 7 Hearings on juvenile Delinquency Before a Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on the judiciary, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 2-5, 192-99 (1955); Laufer, Family Law, 34 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1550, 1551 (1959). 8 There are, of course, risks in agency-placed adoptions. These risks are not legal ones, however, but simply the ordinary risks inherent in every adoption-e.g., the possibility that the child might not develop normally and might not be fully integrated into the family. Whether such risks are less in agency placements than in private placements is not certain. 9 Hearings on juvenile Delinquency, supra note 7, at 3 (remarks of Senator Kefauver). (Emphasis added.) LAW OF ADOPTION post-adoption counseling. These services would also have the valuable by-product of aiding the court in making the best disposition of the case by providing it with carefully drawn reports and recommendations pre- pared by trained social workers. The position taken by the Model Adoption Act in seeking to secure the advantages of such "specialized social knowledge" to the child and his natural and adoptive parents is also found in several existing state statutes. Thus, in Connecticut and Delaware the courts are prohibited from entering a decree of adoption for any child not related to the petitioners in some way, unless the placement has been made by a licensed child welfare agency.10 Likewise, in recent years it has been the practice in many American jurisdictions that before an adoption is decreed, the court must order a study made of the child, his natural parents, and his adoptive parents." This position, it is suggested, repre- sents a forward step in the history of American adoption laws, and a logical development of the American courts' traditional concern for the welfare of the child.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perfect Substitutes Or the Real Thing?
    CAHN.DOC 10/10/03 9:37 AM Duke Law Journal VOLUME 52 APRIL 2003 NUMBER 6 PERFECT SUBSTITUTES OR THE REAL THING? NAOMI CAHN† ABSTRACT This Article traces the development of adoption law using recent scholarship in history and sociology, as well as nineteenth century le- gal sources. The early history of American adoption provides a novel and useful context to analyze the complicated relationships between “traditional” and “alternative” family forms. The Article discusses how judicial interpretations of the meaning of adoption were cabined by the traditional significance of blood relationships, and examines the treatment of adopted and biological children in three contexts: pa- rental consent to adoption, inheritance, and the civil and criminal laws governing incest. The Article argues that the challenge today, as was true more than a century ago, is how to expand the meaning of family without destabilizing families. Copyright © 2003 by Naomi Cahn. † Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School. Many thanks to Anita Al- len-Castellito, Brian Bix, Wayne Carp, Richard Chused, Brad Clark, Tony Gambino, Jill Elaine Hasday, Joan Heifetz Hollinger, Carolyn Lawes, Chip Lupu, Dorothy Roberts, Catherine Ross, Elizabeth Samuels, Sonia Suter, and Robert Tuttle, to participants at a GW Faculty Workshop, and to the organizers of the 2002 American Historical Association panel on Sentimental Families. Thanks to GW for its financial support, to Mary Dini, for superb administrative expertise, and to Chelsea Grimmius, Melissa Loewenstern, Todd Melnick, Trisha Smith, and Michelle Wu for re- search assistance. Finally, as scholarship is a collaborative effort, a special note of thanks to the edi- tors of the Duke Law Journal for overcoming the difficulties of transcontinental editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Law in the United States: a Pathfinder
    Child and Family Law Journal Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 2 2014 Adoption Law In The nitU ed States: A PathFinder Glen-Peter Ahlers Sr. Follow this and additional works at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cflj Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Ahlers, Glen-Peter Sr. (2014) "Adoption Law In The nitU ed States: A PathFinder," Child and Family Law Journal: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cflj/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Barry Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Child and Family Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Barry Law. ADOPTION LAW IN THE UNITED STATES: A PATHFINDER Glen-Peter Ahlers, Sr.* A pathfinder is a research tool that points the way to information resources on a given topic by exploring research paths to the information.1 They identify appropriate information resources and search strategies and selectively provide and discuss guideposts along the research path.2 Typical guideposts on law-related issues include significant legislation, model statutes, court opinions, regulations, journals, books, web pages, associations, and human experts. Before beginning our research journey, we must be clear on the parameters and scope of our topic, adoption law. What is adoption law? According to Black’s Law Dictionary, adoption is the “statutory process of terminating a child’s legal rights and duties toward the natural parents and substituting similar rights and duties toward adoptive parents.”3 While most adoptions involve children, Article five of the Uniform Adoption Act4 and many states allow adults to be adopted as well.5 According to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adopted Child's Experience in Schools and Methods to Improve
    The Adopted Child’s Experience in Schools and Methods to Improve it. Elementary Education Honor’s Thesis Emory Manguilli Wheaton College ‘17 Table of Contents Introduction………...………………………………………………………3 Literature review……..…………………………………………………….6 Interviews Analysis………………………………….…………………....16 Development of Children’s book………………………….………….….21 Development of Unit Plan……………..………………………………….29 Conclusion……………………………………….....………………...……35 Works Cited………………………………………………,,,……………..39 Appendices……………………………………...…………………………43 A. Interview Protocol……………………………………………...43 B. Interview Data………………………………………………….48 C. Children’s Book………………………………………………..62 D. Unit of Study………………….………………………………..75 2 INTRODUCTION I started my junior year at Wheaton College with an idea that I had developed the previous summer. My work with Touched By Adoption, an organization based in Connecticut that aims to “strengthen the wellbeing of families formed through adoption,” inspired this idea. The plan was to write a children’s book about adopted kids, which would incorporate different types of families and to include some type of “curriculum” with it. This curriculum and book would then be published and distributed to classrooms across the United States to give students with a non-heteronormative biological (non- traditional) living situation a sense of inclusion and acceptance. The book and curriculum would serve as a resource for teachers, who, while required to be educated in numerous areas such as special education and teaching English Language Learners (ELLs,) are not necessarily required to learn anything about the development of children from non-traditional families. As an education major, I decided to address this obvious gap in the curriculum, because it seems that non-traditional families have become the norm in our society, rather than the outlier. In the fall semester of 2015, I met with the Dean of First Year students, Jocelyn Emerson, in a typical meeting to discuss our summers.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Oklahoma Adoption Code: a Quest to Accommodate Diverse Interests
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 33 Issue 1 Dedicated to the U.S. Supreme Court Fall 1997 The New Oklahoma Adoption Code: A Quest to Accommodate Diverse Interests D. Marianne Brower Blair [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation D. M. Blair, The New Oklahoma Adoption Code: A Quest to Accommodate Diverse Interests, 33 Tulsa L. J. 177 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol33/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blair: The New Oklahoma Adoption Code: A Quest to Accommodate Diverse In TULSA LAW JOURNAL Volume 33 Fall 1997 Number 1 ARTICLES THE NEW OKLAHOMA ADOPTION CODE: A QUEST TO ACCOMMODATE DIVERSE INTERESTS* D. Marianne Brower Blairt I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 178 II. JURISDICTION, CHOICE OF LAW, AND RECOGNMON ............ 183 A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction .......................... 183 1. Rationale ................................... 183 2. Bases for Jurisdiction .......................... 186 3. Pending Action in Another State ................... 191 4. Effect of Prior Custody Order ..................... 192 5. Relationship of § 7502-1.1 to Other Requirements of the Adop- tion Code, ICWA, and the PKPA .................. 195 B. PersonalJurisdiction and Venue ...................... 197 C. Choice of Law ................................... 198 * OKLA. STAT. tit. 10, § 7501-1.1 to 7511-1.5. t Associate Professor of Law, University of Tulsa College of Law. B.A. 1974, DePauw University; J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Law: Congratulations for Now--Current Law, the Revised Uniform Adoption Act, and Final Adoptions
    Oklahoma Law Review Volume 49 Number 2 1-1-1996 Adoption Law: Congratulations for Now--Current Law, the Revised Uniform Adoption Act, and Final Adoptions Eric C. Czerwinski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric C. Czerwinski, Adoption Law: Congratulations for Now--Current Law, the Revised Uniform Adoption Act, and Final Adoptions, 49 OKLA. L. REV. 323 (1996), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol49/iss2/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oklahoma Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adoption Law: Congratulations! For Now - Current Law, the Revised Uniform Adoption Act, and Final Adoptions L Introduction In 1993, Jim and Colette Rost wanted to expand their family but were unable to conceive any more children.' The Rosts opted for an open adoption, where the adoptive parents and birth parents could meet before the adoption and the birth parents would not be completely excluded from the child's life. The State of Ohio, where the Rosts lived, discourages open adoptions; therefore, the Rosts contacted an attorney in California.2 The attorney introduced the Rosts to a young, unmarried couple, Cindy Ruiz and Richard Adams, who were expecting twin girls. The two couples agreed to the adoption with the Rosts giving Ruiz $10,000 in a trust fund to cover expenses? Both Cindy Ruiz and Richard Adams signed papers consenting to the adoptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption: the Virginia Code Vs. the Uniform Adoption Act
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 11 (2004-2005) Issue 2 William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law: Symposium: Attrition of Women from Article 7 the Legal Profession February 2005 Unwed Fathers' Rights In Adoption: The Virginia Code vs. The Uniform Adoption Act Erin Green Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Family Law Commons Repository Citation Erin Green, Unwed Fathers' Rights In Adoption: The Virginia Code vs. The Uniform Adoption Act, 11 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 267 (2005), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol11/iss2/ 7 Copyright c 2005 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl UNWED FATHERS' RIGHTS IN ADOPTION: THE VIRGINIA CODE vs. THE UNIFORM ADOPTION ACT It was an emotional scene: after a long custody battle, Roberta and Jan DeBoer were forced to give the child they had raised for two and a half years back to the child's birth parents. Much media attention surrounded the case of Baby Jessica, who was born to Cara Clausen on February 8, 1991.' Shortly after the birth, Clausen and Scott Seefeldt, whom Clausen named as Jessica's father, signed release of custody forms.2 Roberta and Jan DeBoer filed a petition for adoption of Jessica; Clausen and Seefeldt's parental rights to Jessica were terminated; and the DeBoers transported their new baby from Iowa to their home in Michigan Nine days after the termination of her parental rights, Clausen filed
    [Show full text]
  • Intercountry Adoptions: Are the Biological Parents' Rights Protected?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 January 2006 Intercountry Adoptions: Are the Biological Parents' Rights Protected? Cynthia Ellen Szejner Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Cynthia Ellen Szejner, Intercountry Adoptions: Are the Biological Parents' Rights Protected?, 5 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 211 (2006), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol5/iss1/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTIONS: ARE THE BIOLOGICAL PARENTS’ RIGHTS PROTECTED? INTRODUCTION The number of international adoptions has increased drastically in recent years.1 In the United States, the number of international adoptions increased from 7,093 in 1990 to nearly 22,884 in 2004.2 The international adoption phenomenon began after World War II when Americans became aware of the plight that abandoned children in Japan and Europe faced in the aftermath of the war.3 “During the 1950s, proxy adoptions, which allowed U.S. citizens to adopt in foreign courts in absentia, were the most widely publicized means of international adoption.”4 After adoptions from Japan and Europe began to slow, the Korean War created a new interest in the children of war-torn Asia.”5 Similarly, as a result of the Vietnam War, 3,267 Vietnamese children were adopted by American parents between 1963 and 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Angels in Adoption ™
    The 2006 Congressional Angels in Adoption™ Gala Program Musical Performance Darryl DMC McDaniels Hip Hop Legend Welcome Bob Madigan, WTOP Radioʼs Man About Town Master of Ceremonies Invocation Dr. Barry C. Black Chaplain, U.S. Senate 1st Course Served Remarks from CCAI Board President The Honorable Jim Oberstar, U.S. House of Representatives Congressional Director, CCAI Message from our Premier & Founding Sponsor Maxine B. Baker President and CEO, Freddie Mac Foundation Remarks from our Event Chairs The Honorable Roy Blunt, U.S. House of Representatives and Mrs. Abigail Blunt Main Course Served Musical Performance Mark Schultz Platinum and Dove Award-Winning Artist Message from CCAI Executive Director Deanna Carlson Stacy Dessert Served Recognition of 2006 Angels in Adoption™ The Honorable Ginny Brown-Waite, U.S. House of Representatives Congressional Director, CCAI Daunte Culpepper Miami Dolphins Quarterback The Honorable Mary Landrieu, U.S. Senate Congressional Director, CCAI Invisible Children Documentary and Grassroots Movement The Honorable Larry Craig, U.S. Senate Congressional Director, CCAI Darryl DMC McDaniels Hip Hop Legend of RUN DMC CCAI Would Like to Thank Thank You Premier and Founding Sponsor to the following for providing in-kind gifts and donating their valuable time and services ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edition AdoptUsKids and the Advertising Council, Inc. Air Tran Airlines Gold Sponsors America World Adoption Association Chevron Barbara Walzer and Harmonious Endeavors Fluor Corporation Capitol Services, Inc. Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation Continental Airlines Target Courteney Holden Washington Group International CVS/pharmacy Silver Sponsors Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption Altria Group, Incorporated DEMDACO Cruise Industry Charitable Foundation Dorie Thompson Diageo DTE Dow Chemical Company Enchanted Strings Ensemble Duke Energy Family Christian Stores Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption Freddie Mac Foundation Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2003 Congressional Awards Celebration
    A Celebration of those Committed Individuals Making a Difference in the Lives of Children and Families September 30, 2003 Washington, DC AngelsTHE 2003 CONGRESSIONAL in TM AWAdoptionARDS CELEBRATION Each year,the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute, CCAI, invites Members of Congress to recognize those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of children and families through adoption by giving them the Congressional Angels in AdoptionTM Award. CCAI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to raising awareness about the tens of thousands of foster children in this country and the millions of orphans around the world in need of permanent, safe, and loving homes; and to eliminating the barriers that hinder these children from realizing their basic need of a family. AngelsTHE 2003 CONGRESSIONAL in AdoptionTM AWARDS CELEBRATION Welcome Tom Jarriel ABCNEWS Anchor, 20/20 Correspondent Message from the Director Kerry Marks Hasenbalg Executive Director, CCAI Message from Event Sponsor Maxine B. Baker President and CEO, Freddie Mac Foundation, Founding & Premier Sponsor Musical Performance Nicole Yonkosky God Bless America 2001 Angel in Adoption™ Award Recipient Invocation Barry Black Chaplain of the United States Senate Presentation of National Congressman Jim Oberstar and Angels in AdoptionTM Award Congressman Dave Camp to Muhammad and Lonnie Ali Presentation of National Senator Larry Craig and Angels in AdoptionTM Award Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to Bruce Willis Special Musical Performance Steven Curtis Chapman
    [Show full text]
  • At a Glance: Adoptees' Right to Know •Fi the Decades-Long Battle for Unsealing Adoption Records
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2013 At A Glance: Adoptees' Right to Know – The Decades-Long Battle for nseU aling Adoption Records Rotem Peretz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Peretz, Rotem, "At A Glance: Adoptees' Right to Know – The eD cades-Long Battle for nU sealing Adoption Records" (2013). Law School Student Scholarship. 284. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/284 I. INTRODUCTION In New Jersey, the average individual need only complete three steps to obtain his or her birth certificate: identify name, as well as date and place of birth, provide identification, such as a copy of a valid driver’s license (even a simple combination of bank statement and school ID would suffice), and pay a $25 fee.1 Of course, Vital Statistics has an entire page dedicated to walking individuals through the process, as simple as it may be. As for adoptees, Vital Statistics has one simple message: “When the adoption is placed on file with the Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, the original birth certificate and all documents related to the adoption are placed under seal. This seal can only be broken by court order.”2 As one reads on, it will soon become apparent that breaking the seal via court order is no easy endeavor. Still, such has been the life of most adoptees for the better part of the twentieth century. This paper seeks to provide an overview of the “right to know” movement – adoptees’ legal and political fight to freely obtain copies of their original birth certificates, learn the names of their biological parents, and any other such information contained in state-sealed adoption records.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening New York's Protection for Unwed Mothers Michelle Cucuzza
    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 61 | Issue 3 Article 5 3-1-1995 The niU form Adoption Act: Strengthening New York's Protection for Unwed Mothers Michelle Cucuzza Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Recommended Citation Michelle Cucuzza, The Uniform Adoption Act: Strengthening New York's Protection for Unwed Mothers, 61 Brook. L. Rev. 931 (1995). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol61/iss3/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. NOTES THE UNIFORM ADOPTION ACT: STRENGTHENING NEW YORKS PROTECTION FOR UNWED MOTHERS" INTRODUCTION Adoption establishes a legal relationship of child and par- ent between persons who are not related biologically.' Simul- taneously, adoption severs any legal relationship between the adopted child and his or her biological parents, thereby termi- nating all the biological parents' rights and responsibilities associated with the child.2 Because the federal government traditionally has refrained from interfering in domestic rela- tions,' no federal adoption statute exists.' The creation of ' This article is limited to the unique situation of unwed birth mothers who, unlike many married couples, are considered more suspectable to coercion, fraud, and duress because they are often young and extremely vulnerable to societal, fa- milial, and financial pressures to place their children up for adoption. Jane A. Robert, Parental Consent The Need for an Informed Decision in the Private Adop- tion Scheme, 47 LA. L. REV. 889, 895 (1987). 1 N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Children and Family Services
    Agency # 016.15 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES FAMILY SERVICES POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Contents I. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DIVISION OVERVIEW II. SERVICES TO ASSESS FAMILY STRENGTHS AND NEEDS III. SERVICES CASE OPENING IV. SERVICES CASE PLAN AND STAFFING V. SERVICES TO PRESERVE FAMILIES IN THEIR HOMES VI. SERVICES TO REUNIFY FAMILIES VII. SERVICES TO SUPPORT FOSTER PARENTS VIII. SERVICES TO PROVIDE OTHER PERMANENT LIVING SITUATIONS IX. SERVICES ACCOUNTABILITY X. SPECIAL SERVICES XI. DCFS EDUCATIONAL LEAVE AND EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE APPENDIX: I. GLOSSARY II. ADOPTIONS III. PERIODICITY SCHEDULES FOR HEALTH CARE IV. LAWS V. RECORD RETENTION SCHEDULE VI. RECORD ORDER/RECORD FILE ORDER (FAMILY FOSTER HOMES) VII. CASE RECORD ORDER (OUT-OF-HOME PLACEMENT) VIII. PROTOCOL FOR FAMILY SERVICE WORKERS – Responding to Methamphetamine and Meth Lab Exposure of Children IX. FOSTER HOME RECRUITMENT AND APPROVAL FLOW CHART FSPP TABLE OF CONTENTS 08/24/2006 I. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DIVISION OVERVIEW ________________________ I-1 POLICY (I-A): PHILOSOPHY AND MISSION STATEMENT FOR THE DIVISION OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES _________________________________________________________________________I-1 POLICY (I-B): FAMILY SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM___________________________________________I-2 POLICY (I-C): DIVISION’S ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE _____________________________________I-3 POLICY (I-D): OFFICIAL RECORD KEEPING ___________________________________________________I-4 POLICY (I-E) COMPLIANCE WITH
    [Show full text]