DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 3 . Number 1 . March 2002 Transcendent Philosophy An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 3 . Number 1 . March 2002 Transcendent Philosophy An Volume 3 . Number 1 . March 2002 Transcendent Philosophy An International Journal for Comparative Philosophy and Mysticism Articles Mohsen Araki Causality and Freedom Fatima Modarresi A Tale of Occidental Estrangement Mas’oud Oumid A comparative study of the epistemology of Suhrawardi and Allamah Tabataba`i Vida Ahmadi Philosophical and Mystical Approaches to the ‘Dialogue of Civilizations’ Book Reviews Robert McKim, Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001 (Oliver Leaman) Valérie Gonzalez, Beauty and Islam: Aesthetics in Islamic Art and Architecture, London, I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2001 (Nader El‐Bizri) Ali Benmakhlouf, Le vocabulaire de Frege, Paris, Ellipses, 2001 (Oliver Leaman) A. de Libera, A. Elamrani‐Jamal & A. Galonnier (eds), Langages et philosophie: Hommage à Jean Jolivet, Études de Philosophie Médiévale LXXIV, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin 1997, pp. xx + 426, paper, FF 342 (Sajjad Rizvi) A. Maurières & Eric Ossart, Paradise Gardens, London: I B Tauris, 2001 (Oliver Leaman) Nader El‐Bizri, The Phenomenological Quest between Avicenna and Heidegger, Binghamton: Global Publications, 2000 (Ronald Bruzina) Oliver Leaman, A Brief Introduction to Islamic Philosophy, Cambridge: Polity Press 1999, pp. 199, paper, £12.95. (Sajjad Rizvi) Books Received Causality and Freedom Mohsen Araki, Islamic Centre of England, UK Abstract According to Mull¡ ˉadr¡’s theory of necessity, a determined causal law governs the relationship between cause and effect, a relationship that encompasses human behaviour. There is no contrast between this determined causal law and free will. This theory will be examined and contrasted with the Sayyed Mu¦ammad B¡qir al‐ˉadr’s exposition on free will. Al‐ˉadr’s theory of al‐sal§ana or mastery suggests that free will is not compatible with the determined casual law. Free action and moral agency is led by the power of mastery. In this study, these two theories will be explained briefly. We shall attempt to evaluate which one of the two is more reasonable and preferable as a theory of human agency. One of the earliest problems in philosophy that has occupied minds of great philosophers and has been debated in different philosophical ages is the problem of causality and its relation to freedom. Depth of philosophical problems pertaining to causality and freedom on the one hand and the close relation between these two notions, theoretical and practical systems of man and also many problems in philosophy, theology and humanities such as law, ethics and psychology on the other hand, has made this discussion very important and vital. In Islamic philosophy, the great Muslim philosopher, Sadrul Muta’llihin, known as Sadra, has made one of the most profound studies of "causality" and its relation to "human freedom". One of the controversial problems among Muslim philosophers and theologians that led to some of the most heated debates in philosophy and theology is the very problem of "causality" and interpretation of "freedom" on its basis. These debates were marginalised after the decline of traditional theology and its inclusion in philosophy, mostly after the appearance of transcendental philosophy of Sadra. For a short period Sadra’s philosophy managed to be the dominant and governing trend in the history of Islamic thought. This situation did not last for a long time, because simultaneous to the decline of "theological thought", the science of the principles of jurisprudence tremendously developed in Shi‘a thought and replaced "the theological current" in its intellectual debates with the philosophical thought. In this way, some of the earlier disputes between Muslim theologians and philosophers were revived in another form and a new school with a new way of thinking merged against the philosophical thought, which was embodied in the transcendental philosophy of Sadra. This new school can be called, "The School of Modern Usuliyyun", those who became experts in the principles of jurisprudence. Among the modern usuliyun, Akhund Mulla Muhammad Kazim Khurasani represents Sadrian Islamic thought. Defending principles of "Sadrian philosophy", Akhund greatly supported the Sadrean view in the interpretation of causality and its relation to freedom. On the other side, his intelligent and insightful pupil, i.e. Mirza Na‘ini was one of the strong critics of Sadrian view. In a new way and method, he criticised the Sadrian philosophical thought and presented a new viewpoint on the relation between causality and human freedom. Na‘ini can be considered as the one who started a new way of dealing with the problem of causality and its relation to human freedom. Although his idea was not developed into a complete theory, it opened the way for a new and complete theory that was developed by the great contemporary thinker and philosopher Ayatullah Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al‐ Sadr. This theory was called the theory of Saltanah, sovereignty. In this essay, after explaining briefly the philosophical theory of Sadra on the relation between causality and freedom which we shall call later the theory of necessity (wujub) and martyr Sadr’s theory of sovereignty (saltanah), we will compare these two theories with each other. We will also criticise and analyse them. The Theory of Necessity (Sadra’s theory in the interpretation of causality and its relation to human freedom) Before explaining the theory of necessity, it is noteworthy that the reason beyond calling this theory "The Theory of Necessity" lies in the fact that according to this theory the relation between cause and effect is both the relation of existence and that of necessity. The dispute between Muslim philosophers and theologians on all types of cause on one hand and between philosophers and modern usuliyyun on voluntary agent or cause on the other hand does not concern bringing of the effect into existence by the cause, but rather granting necessity to the effect by the cause. According to the theory of necessity, the effect not only depends on the cause for its existence, but also for its necessity. Early theologians took the cause in a general sense and the mainstream of modern usuliyyun take the voluntary agent in a particular sense just as the originator of the effect and not as the necessitating. To give a comprehensive account of "necessity" containing its philosophical grounds in Sadra’s view requires a long and broad discussion which is beyond the scope of this short essay. Here we are concerned with three subjects that we will study in the following order: short explanation of "The Theory of Necessity" in Sadra’s thought an account of the hypotheses of philosophical contradiction between this theory and the principle of free will method of philosophical solution of the above‐mentioned contradiction according to Sadra and the theory of necessity. 1‐ Short Explanation of the Theory of Necessity According to the theory of asalat al‐wujud (principiality of existence), natures (quiddities) are conventions of our mind and what is really there is just "being" or "existence". In other words, among all concepts and mental images, the only concept that can describe the external world and can genuinely represent the reality outside our mind is the concept of "being". Therefore, the key to know the universal laws and rules that govern the universe is the universal principle of asalat al‐wujud. The general structure of philosophical knowledge of the world is based on this principle, from which the universal philosophical laws governing the world have to be derived. The most important philosophical principles of cosmology derived from asalat al‐wujud are: A‐ Graduation (hierarchical structure) of Being According to asalat al‐wujud, the differences that we understand among things in the world are all rooted in their "being" and can have no root other than the reality of ‘being’. Therefore, all things in the world differ in "being", just as they share ‘being’. The reality of being [in contrast to the concept of being] is a reality that admits differences and multicity of types and every type of being is a level of being which is different from other beings in intensity and weakness, and unlimitedness and limitedness. Different types of being differ from each other in that one is weaker, that is, more dependent and more needy and the other is more intense, that is, more independent and less needy. The difference of being in degrees of dependence on and need for the other which is the same as the difference in weakness and intensity is the source for all differences and varieties in the world. The peak and the most intense being is the self‐independent being which is absolutely free from need, that is, the eternal self‐necessary being. The self‐necessary being has no need for any condition and is the absolute being and enjoys the ultimate existential actuality. The self‐necessary being is the originator of the hierarchy of being. All other levels of being are manifestations of self‐necessary being, on whom they entirely depend. Despite its total dependence on the self‐necessary being, the first being created by the self‐necessary being has no need to other levels of being and therefore in relation to other levels of being enjoys independence, freedom from need and absoluteness. Other levels of being depend for their existence on self‐necessary being and on the first creature as well, since through it the grace of being extends to other levels. Thus, the highest being is the completely actual independent absolute self‐necessary being and the lowest is the being that has nothing other than potentiality of being. In his Mabda’ wa Ma‘ad, Mulla, Sadra says: And beings do not differ in their essence except in intensity and weakness, perfection and imperfection, priority and posteriority. Being accidentally differs because of those notions that are subordinate to them, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Avicenna's Philosophy of Mathematics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Avicenna’s Philosophy of Mathematics Mohaammad Saleh Zarepour Faculty of Divinity University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clare Hall January 2019 I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, except where specifically indicated in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation is the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution. This dissertation does not exceed the 80,000-word limit. The second chapter, with slight modifications, has been published in Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review. The first and thrid chapters, again with some revisions, are accepted for publication, respectively, in Oriens and Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. The final chapter is under review for publication in another journal. Mohammad Saleh Zarepour January 2019 i Avicenna’s Philosophy of Mathematics Mohammad Saleh Zarepour ABSTRACT. I discuss four different aspects of Avicenna’s philosophical views on mathematics, as scattered across his various works. I first explore the negative aspect of his ontology of mathematics, which concerns the question of what mathematical objects (i.e., numbers and geometrical shapes) are not. Avicenna argues that mathematical objects are not independent immaterial substances. They cannot be fully separated from matter. He rejects what is now called mathematical Platonism.
    [Show full text]
  • Module Template: 1. Description of the Course
    Module Template: 1. Description of the course PHI 215, Philosophical Issues. This course introduces fundamental issues in philosophy considering the views of classical and contemporary philosophers. Emphasis is placed on knowledge and belief, appearance and reality, determinism and free will, faith and reason, and justice and inequality. Upon completion, students should be able to identify, analyze, and critically evaluate the philosophical components of an issue. 2. Description of the Module This Global module will focus specifically on Islamic philosophical tradition. Students will learn in brief about the history of Islamic philosophy, from the formative period of Al Kindi to Ibn Rushd and the impact this tradition had on Europe and the development of the western philosophical tradition. With this brief introduction to the history, various Islamic Philosophers will be examined across the topics of the course. Later thinkers, such as Mulla Sadra will also be introduced. This module is designed to provide a brief overview of history, and a more in-depth look to Islamic responses to the same questions faced in what is traditionally understood as Western Philosophy. As such, the activities can be done as part of a unified module, or they can be broken up and added to the course when each philosophical topic is covered. 3. Global Learning Outcomes 1. Describe the history of Islamic philosophy and explain its interaction with and impact on Western European philosophy. 2. Identify select Islamic philosophers and their positions on select philosophical issues by reading key Islamic philosophical works and/or secondary sources. 3. Develop skills used in reading and analyzing a philosophical issue 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: Una Novela Filosófica De Ibn Tufayl
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba ISSN: 0213-1854 Hayy ibn Yaqzan: Una novela filosófica de Ibn Tufayl (Hayy ibn Yaqzan: A Philosophical Novel by Ibn Tufayl) ROY JACKSON [email protected] University of Gloucestershire Fecha de recepción: 21 de febrero de 2017 Fecha de aceptación: 31 de marzo de 2017 Resumen: Trabajo que aborda el relato filosófico Hayy ibn Yaqzan, titulado así por el héroe de la historia y escrito por el filósofo musulmán Ibn Tufayl (1105- 1185). Fue la primera novela árabe y se anticipó a obras europeas como Robinson Crusoe, de Daniel Defoe, y Emile, de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, así como al pensamiento de varios filósofos occidentales, incluidos Locke y Kant. Este artículo investiga los temas filosóficos contenidos en la novela, centrados en las cuestiones filosóficas clave de “¿qué podemos saber?” Y “¿cómo podemos saber?” Estas preguntas acompañan al ser humano desde el comienzo de la filosofía y siguen siendo importantes actualmente con un debate tan polémico sobre la veracidad de la experiencia no empírica. Palabras clave: Neoplatonismo. Iluminacionismo. Marifa. Orientalismo. Abstract: This is the philosophical tale Hayy ibn Yaqzan, named after the hero of this story and written by the Muslim philosopher Ibn Tufayl (1105-1185). It was the first Arabic novel, and anticipated such European works as Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Emile, as well as the thought of a number of western philosophers including Locke and Kant. This paper will bring out the philosophical themes contained within the novel, centred on those key philosophical questions of ‘what can we know?’ and ‘how can we know?’.
    [Show full text]
  • (H.Uzn) in the Muslim Tradition: with Special Reference to Said Nursi
    Durham E-Theses Sorrow (h. uzn) in the Muslim Tradition: with Special Reference to Said Nursi TURNER, MAHSHID,FATEMEH How to cite: TURNER, MAHSHID,FATEMEH (2016) Sorrow (h. uzn) in the Muslim Tradition: with Special Reference to Said Nursi , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11904/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Sorrow (ḥuzn) in the Muslim Tradition: with Special Reference to Said Nursi Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Mahshid Fatemeh Turner Copyright with the author. No quotation from this thesis should be published without prior consent and any information accessed from it should be acknowledged. Durham University Theology Department May, 2016 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the people who have supported me throughout this long but enjoyable study.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Breakthroughs in Islamic Medicine Zakaria Virk, Canada
    Medical Breakthroughs in Islamic Medicine Zakaria Virk, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Physicians occupied a high social position in the Arab and Persian culture. Prominent physicians served as ministers or judges of the government and were also appointed as royal physicians. Physicians were well-versed in logic, philosophy and natural sciences. All of the prominent Muslim philosophers earned their livelihood through the practice of medicine. Muslim physicians made astounding break throughs in the fields of allergy, anatomy, bacteriology, botany, dentistry, embryology, environmentalism, etiology, immunology, microbiology, obstetrics, ophthalmology, pathology, pediatrics, psychiatry, psychology, surgery, urology, zoology, and the pharmaceutical sciences. The Islamic medical scholars gathered vast amounts of information, from around the known world, added their own observations and developed techniques and procedures that would form the basis of modern medicine. In the history of medicine, Islamic medicine stands out as the period of greatest advance, certainly before the technology of the 20th century. Aristotle teaching, from document in the British Library, showing the great reverence of the Islamic scholars for their Greek predecessor 1 This article will cover remarkable medical feats
    [Show full text]
  • On the Soul: the Floating Man by Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā), Various Excerpts (~1020-1037 AD)
    On the Soul: The Floating Man by Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā), various excerpts (~1020-1037 AD) *** first excerpt from The Psychology of the Book of Healing: On the Soul (Kitab al-Shifa: Tabiyat: ilm al-Nafs) (~1020 AD) translated by John McGinnis & David Reisman (2007) 1.1. Establishing the Existence of the Soul and Defining It As Soul 1. We must first direct our discussion to establishing the existence of the thing we call a soul, and next to whatever follows from that. We say: We commonly observe certain bodies perceiving by the senses and being moved by volition; in fact, we observe certain bodies taking in nutrients, growing, and reproducing their like. That does not belong to them on account of their corporeality; so the remaining option is that in themselves there are principles for that other than their corporeality. The thing out of which these actions issue and, in short, anything that is a principle for the issuance of any actions that do not follow a uniform course devoid of volition, we call “soul.” This expression is a term for this thing not on account of its substance but on account of a certain relation it has, that is, in the sense that it is a principle of these actions [i.e., “perceiving”, “being moved by volition”, “taking in nutrients, growing, and reproducing”, etc.]. We will seek to identify its substance and the category to which it belongs later. For now, we have established the existence of something that is a principle only of what we stated, and we have established the existence of something in the sense that it has a particular accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Islamic Psychology and Psychotherapy: a Grounded Theory Study
    Building an Islamic Psychology and Psychotherapy: A Grounded Theory Study by Abdallah Eric David ROTHMAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology Kingston University London June 2019 Abstract At a time when there is increasing focus on the need to adapt approaches to psychotherapy to align with the cultural and religious/spiritual orientations of clients, this thesis explores the ontological foundations of psychology from an Islamic paradigm and how these foundational assumptions about human nature can inform practical applications for Islamic psychotherapy. The thesis presents a detailed literature review and two phases of the research study that both used a constructivist version of the grounded theory approach. In the first phase of the study, 18 scholars of Islam were interviewed as “key informants” whose input provided insights into the various branches of knowledge within the Islamic tradition that are relevant to the construction of an Islamic paradigm of human psychology. From the analysis of the interview transcripts, codes were created relating to concepts of the psyche, notions of human development, and understanding of the structure of the soul from the participants’ understanding of Islamic religious sources. An Islamic model of the soul was constructed from these findings. This is presented as a framework for the development of clinical applications in psychotherapy. In the second phase, 18 clinicians who integrate Islamic principles in their approaches with clients in psychotherapy were interviewed. From the analysis of the interview transcripts, codes were created based on the theoretical categories from the first phase, explicating how the Islamic model of the soul generated in that phase can be used to inform practical approaches to therapeutic application.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibn Sīnā on Floating Man Arguments
    Ibn Sīnā on Floating Man Arguments Ahmed Alwishah n his writings on psychology, Ibn Sīnā embarked on a compre- hensive project: an investigation of the existence of the self, and an exploration of the self’s nature. The lynchpin of this project is the Floating Man Argument (hereafter FMA),1 and the subsequentI discussions that surround it, especially in al-Taʿliqāt and al-Mubāḥathāt. Several scholars have examined FMA in the past. However, they have focused mostly on the earliest version of Ibn Sīnā’s al-Nafs, and paid little or no attention to other extant versions of this text, which appear—critically—to be more advanced.2 This 1 Most scholars have translated the term as “Flying Man.” I believe that the accurate translation is “Floating Man,” because the name of the argument is derived from the verb yahwā in al-Nafs, which literally means “to fall down,” and from muʿallaqa in al-Ishārāt, which has a range of meanings, among them “floating.” Thus, from both meanings, it is more appropriate to deduce the name “Floating Man.” See Ibn Sīnā, al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbihāt, ed. Sulaymān Dunyā (Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1957); Avicenna’s De anima (Arabic text): being the psychological part of Kitāb al-Shifā’, ed. F. Rahman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959). 2 See scholars such as S. Pines, “La Conception de la Conscience de Soi chez Avicenne et chez Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī,” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 29 (1954): 21–56; M. Marmura, “Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context,” Monist 69 (1986): 383–396; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Bibliographic Guide in Medieval Islamic Philosophy and Theology
    BRIEF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL GUIDE IN MEDIEVAL AND POST-CLASSICAL ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY (2015-2016) Thérèse-Anne Druart The Catholic University of America I cannot thank enough all the scholars who kindly sent me information, in particular, those who provided me with a copy of their publications or photocopies of tables of contents of collective works. They are true scholars and true friends. I also wish to thank very much the colleagues who patiently checked the draft of this installment. Their invaluable help was a true work of mercy. I am very happy to announce that, thanks to Dr. Andreas Lammer’s work and Professor Peter Adamson’s support, the Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität München is preparing a combined and searchable version of the installments of this bibliography. The data for the years 2009-2015 have already been put into a new format. We hope to provide a first version of the combined bibliography in 2017. Needless to say, I am most grateful to Professor Adamson, Dr. Andreas Lammer and his team for all their work. Collective Works or Collections of Articles Adorare caelestia, gubernare terrena. Atti del Colloquio internazionale in onore di Paolo Lucentini (Napoli, 6-7 Novembre 2007), ed. by Pasquale Arfé, Irene Caiazzo & Antonella Sannino (Instrumenta patristica et mediaevalia. Research on the Inheritance of Early and Medieval Christianity 58). Turnhout: Brepols, 2011, x-562 pp., ISBN 9782503534909. Aims, Methods and Contexts of Qur’anic Exegesis (2nd/8th-9th/15th c.), ed. by Karen Bauer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xvi-503 pp., ISBN 9780199670642. Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • God and Humans in Islamic Thought
    Maha-FM.qxd 17/5/06 3:35 PM Page i God and Humans in Islamic Thought The explanation of the relationship between God and humans, as portrayed in Islam, is often influenced by the images of God and of human beings which theologians, philosophers and mystics have in mind. The early period of Islam discloses a diversity of interpretations of this relationship. Thinkers from the tenth- and eleventh century had the privilege of disclosing different facets of the relationship between humans and the Divine. God and Humans in Islamic Thought discusses the view of three different scholars of the time: ‘Abd al-Jabbmr, Ibn Slnm and al-Ghazmll. The relationships discussed in this work are: divine assistance, luyf, according to ‘Abd al-Jabbmr; human love and attraction to the Divine, ‘ishq, according to Ibn Slnm; and finally the mystical annihilation of the self in the divine unity, fanm’, of al-Ghazmll. They introduced three approaches of looking at this relationship. In order to perceive these concepts, their perception of God and of the human nature will also be examined here. The starting point of this research was the desire to set forth a variety of possible relationships which are all in accordance with Islamic belief but nevertheless demonstrate diversity in understanding the relationship between the human and the Divine which in turn suggests the concept of plurality within one religion. Examining these three concepts, which build firm connections between God and humans, reveals the importance of rational inquiry in medieval Islamic thought, not only because it was a source of logical arguments for Islam against its opponents, but mainly because it built different bridges leading to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Awareness in Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi
    The Flightless Man: Self-Awareness in Fakhr al-Din al-Razi Mehmet Zahit Tiryaki* Translated by Ayaz Asadov*** Abstract: The flying man thought experiment upon which Avicenna grounds his theory of self-awareness (al-shu‘ūr al-dhātī) and justifies the argument that the soul is an immaterial, incorporeal and independent substance, has drawn as much interest in the modern era as it has in the classical Islamic and Latin worlds, spawning various interpretations on what to make of the experiment’s basic claim and purpose. Commentators of both traditions differ on the basic claim and purpose of the flying man experiment, depending the ontological and epistemological attitudes they emphasize. This study firstly tries to clarify the claim and purpose of the experiment, inasmuch as it forms the basis of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s criticisms. It proceeds to briefly point out the context of the experiment from Avicenna to al-Rāzī, and examine al-Rāzī’s comments and criticisms thereof. Since he rejects the claim that the soul is an immaterial, incorporeal and independent substance, it follows that al-Rāzī does not understand the term essence (dhāt) in self-awareness (al-shu‘ūr al-dhātī) in the same way as Avicenna, who through the experiment, argues the exact opposite. Al-Rāzī rather interprets essence directly as the self, from which he proceeds to develop a distinct understanding of self-awareness. Keywords: Avicenna, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, flying man, al-shu‘ūr al-dhātī, self-consciousness, self- awareness, soul, body. * Assist. Prof., Istanbul Medeniyet University, Department of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Abu Ali Sina … Avicenna Quotes … Philosopher
    Abu Ali Sina … Avicenna Quotes … Philosopher https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/avicenna.html Therefore in medicine we ought to The world is divided into men who That whose existence is know the causes of sickness and have wit and no religion and men necessary must necessarily be health. who have religion and no wit. one essence. Avicenna Avicenna Avicenna Health, Sickness, Medicine Religion, Men, World Essence, Existence, Must The knowledge of anything, since Now it is established in the As to the mental essence, we find all things have causes, is not sciences that no knowledge is it in infants devoid of every acquired or complete unless it is acquired save through the study mental form. known by its causes. of its causes and beginnings, if it has had causes and beginnings; nor completed except by knowledge of its accidents and Abu Ali Sina accompanying essentials. Abu Ali Sina Abu Ali Sina Knowledge, All Things Knowledge, Study, Beginnings Find, Essence, Mental Those who Know they do not Know that to Know is to Know what they do not Know! Ali Sina Wisdom, Islamic, Knowledge Human rights are for those who can behave like humans. If you can't act responsibly you relinquish that right. Ali Sina Rights, Behave, Humans What distinguishes us humans from animals is our conscience. Once our conscience is gone we lose our humanness. Without conscience, humans can be far more dangerous than beasts. Beasts kill for food, humans kill for ideology. Beasts kill just enough to eat. Humans can kill endlessly. Ali Sina Animal, Gone, Beast Muslims insult all other religions.
    [Show full text]