DOCSLIB.ORG

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00486-JEB ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF STATE ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 7, Plaintiff Republican National Committee (“Plaintiff”) hereby moves for summary judgment in this case ordering production in full and without redaction certain records that include daily electronic calendars reflecting the “Schedule For President William J. Clinton.” As more fully set forth in the accompanying Memorandum in Support of the Republican National Committee’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, summary judgment ordering Defendant produce documents it claimed as exempt under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) is appropriate. Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment because: first, the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact as pertains to the calendars claimed as exempt under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) and second, the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant declined to produce the requested documents under the Freedom of Information Act and therefore bears the burden before the Court of proving the applicability of the claimed statutory Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 2 exemption. Defendant cannot make a showing sufficient to establish the applicability of the exemption. Thus, Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. In accordance with Local Rule 7(f), Plaintiff respectfully requests an oral hearing. Dated: July 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, __/s/ Jason Torchinsky_______ JASON TORCHINSKY (DC Bar No. 976033) Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLC 45 North Hill Drive, Suite 100 Warrenton, VA 20186 Phone: (540) 341-8808 Fax: (540) 341-8809 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15-1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00486-JEB ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF STATE ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION On June 16, 2016, the Department of State (“State Department” or “Defendant”) produced to Plaintiff 162 pages of records that included daily electronic calendars reflecting the “Schedule For President William J. Clinton.” This should have been a meaningful production, but instead, Defendant completely redacted entire portions of the schedules (save for the accompanying local weather reports), asserting that the concealed information is subject to the “personal privacy” exemption under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6). (See Exhibit A at 109-116, 155-162). But that exemption does not apply here, because former President Clinton’s calendar was disseminated to at least 50 other persons, including individuals within the State Department – among them at least four senior officials – apparently to facilitate day-to-day operations of the agency while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. For the reasons briefed below, Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court for partial 1 Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15-1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 8 summary judgment that these electronic calendar items of former President William J. Clinton are agency records that must be promptly produced to Plaintiff without redaction. STANDARD OF REVIEW “FOIA cases are typically and appropriately decided on motions for summary judgment.” Inst. for Policy Studies v. C.I.A., 885 F. Supp. 2d 120, 132 (D.D.C. 2012) (internal citations omitted). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, “[t]he court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Summary judgment thus will be granted “against a party who . fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Inst. for Policy Studies, 88 F. Supp. 2d at 132 (internal quotations and citations omitted). It is well understood that FOIA “was conceived in an effort to permit access by the citizenry to most forms of government records.” Vaughan v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820, 823 (D.C. Cir. 1973). Accordingly, it “provides that all documents are available to the public unless specifically exempted by the Act itself.” Id.; accord Charles v. Office of Armed Forces Med. Exam’r, 730 F. Supp. 2d 205, 211 (D.D.C. 2010) (“FOIA affords the public access to virtually any federal government record that FOIA itself does not specifically exempt from disclosure.”). Therefore, “[w]hen an agency declines to produce a requested document, the agency bears the burden before the trial court of proving the applicability of claimed statutory exemptions.” Summers v. Dep’t of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1080 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B)); accord Beck v. Dep't of Justice, 997 F.2d 1489, 1491 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (“Consistent with the purpose of the Act, the burden is on the agency to justify withholding requested documents.”) (internal citations omitted). Furthermore, the agency must detail what proportion of the information 2 Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15-1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 3 of 8 within a document is non-exempt “and how that material is dispersed throughout the document,” and “[a]ny non-exempt information that is reasonably segregable from the requested records must be disclosed.” Barnard v. Dep’t Homeland Security, 531 F. Supp. 2d 131, 136 (D.D.C. 2008) (internal citations omitted). ARGUMENT The records at issue here, “Schedule[s] For President William J. Clinton,” plainly are not exempt from production by FOIA § 552(b)(6). (See Exhibit A at 109-116, 155-162). Section 552(b)(6) exempts only “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” Critical to the Court’s inquiry into whether the exemption applies is a determination of whether the redacted communications qualify as “agency records” subject to disclosure under FOIA. Clearly they do. Former President Clinton is a federal official; his staff is federally funded; he was receiving State Department briefs; and his calendar was distributed quite widely within, and without, the agency – as evidenced by the more than 50 different recipients listed on the email chain, at least four of whom were senior State Department officials at the time.1 (See Exhibit A at 109, 113, 115, 155). The seminal case concerning whether certain calendars or schedules qualify as “agency records” subject to FOIA is Bureau of National Affairs v. U.S. Department of Justice. Bureau of Nat’l Affairs v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 742 F.2d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1984). In that case, the D.C. Circuit set forth four factors that must be weighed as part of a “totality of the circumstances” test to determine whether a document is an “agency record”: whether the documents were (1) within the agency’s control, (2) generated by the agency, (3) placed into the agency’s files, and (4) used 1 Those State Department personnel include: Andrew Shapiro, Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Cheryl Mills, Chief of Staff and Counselor to the Secretary of State; Lona Valmoro, Scheduling, Office of the Secretary; and Philippe Reines, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Public Affairs. (Exhibit A at 109, 113, 115, 155). 3 Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 15-1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 4 of 8 by the agency “for any purpose.” Id. at 1489-94; accord Consumer Fed’n of Am v. Dep’t of Agric., 455 F.3d 283, 288-89 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Considerations of “control” and “use” must be assessed holistically. Cases, in other words, “cannot be compartmentalized rigidly into either a ‘control’ or a ‘use’ analysis. [T]he inquiry necessarily must focus on a variety of factors surrounding the creation, possession, control, and use of the document by an agency.” Bureau of Nat’l Affairs at 1490 (citing Crooker v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 730 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1984)). The Bureau of National Affairs court distinguished and placed particular weight on whether the calendars and agendas at issue were used for official business or meant solely for personal use, concluding that if individuals within the agency relied on a document to perform their duties, then that document is an “agency record” subject to FOIA. See 742 F.2d at 1493. On the one hand, the court found that certain desk calendars maintained solely for the personal convenience of an individual official, and to which only his top assistants had occasional access, were personal in nature and thus not agency records. Id. at 1496-97. On the other hand, it deemed certain daily agendas to be agency records because they were distributed to top staff so that they would know the assistant attorney general’s whereabouts on any given day and maintained to help facilitate day-to-day operations of the division. Id. at 1495-96. The court in Consumer Federation of America, moreover, found that the uses to which five senior USDA officials’ calendars were put were indistinguishable from the daily agendas in Bureau of National Affairs and thus subject to FOIA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hillary Clinton Is Discharged from Hospital After Blood Clot - the New
    Hillary Clinton Is Discharged From Hospital After Blood Clot - The New... http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/hillary-clinton-is-discha... http://nyti.ms/WlP7Dz POLITICS By DENISE GRADY and MARK LANDLER JAN. 2, 2013 Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose globe-trotting tour as secretary of state was abruptly halted last month by a series of health problems, was discharged from a New York hospital on Wednesday evening after several days of treatment for a blood clot in a vein in her head. The news of her release was the first welcome sign in a troubling month that grounded Mrs. Clinton — preventing her from answering questions in Congress about the State Department’s handling of the lethal attack on an American mission in Libya or being present when President Obama announced Senator John Kerry as his choice for her successor when she steps down as secretary of state. “Her medical team advised her that she is making good progress on all fronts, and they are confident she will make a full recovery,” Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to Mrs. Clinton, said in a statement. Mrs. Clinton, 65, was admitted to NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia hospital on Sunday after a scan discovered the blood clot. The scan was part of her follow-up care for a concussion she sustained more than two weeks earlier, when she fainted and fell, striking her head. According to the State Department, the fainting was caused by dehydration, brought on by a stomach virus. The concussion was diagnosed on Dec. 1 of 4 8/9/2016 11:01 PM Hillary Clinton Is Discharged From Hospital After Blood Clot - The New..
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:13-cv-00825-ABJ Document 73 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GILBERTE JILL KELLEY, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-825 (ABJ) ) THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEFENDANT FBI’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI” or “the Bureau”), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(d)(3) and 26(c), respectfully moves the Court for a protective order: (a) Limiting the September 2, 2015, deposition of FBI Supervisory Special Agent Adam Malone (to the extent the deposition remains open and continued) on the Rule 30(d)(3) ground that certain portions of the deposition were “conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses” the witness or the FBI pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3); and (b) Restricting, pursuant to Rule 26(c), any further FBI-related discovery to the discovery of (1) facts sufficient to show disclosure(s) to the media by one or more FBI employees in a manner violating the Privacy Act, and (2) facts relating to the governments’ defenses to the plaintiffs’ remaining claims. Co-defendant the Department of Defense (“DoD”) concurs with the motion. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(m), counsel for defendants have met and conferred with counsel for plaintiffs. Plaintiffs oppose this motion. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Statement of Points and Authorities and the FBI’s proposed Under Seal Supplement, the Court should grant the instant motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Clinton's Campaign Was Undone by a Clash of Personalities
    64 Hillary Clinton’s campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memos— published here for the first time—reveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown. BY JOSHUA GREEN The Front-Runner’s Fall or all that has been written and said about Hillary Clin- e-mail feuds was handed over. (See for yourself: much of it is ton’s epic collapse in the Democratic primaries, one posted online at www.theatlantic.com/clinton.) Fissue still nags. Everybody knows what happened. But Two things struck me right away. The first was that, outward we still don’t have a clear picture of how it happened, or why. appearances notwithstanding, the campaign prepared a clear The after-battle assessments in the major newspapers and strategy and did considerable planning. It sweated the large newsweeklies generally agreed on the big picture: the cam- themes (Clinton’s late-in-the-game emergence as a blue-collar paign was not prepared for a lengthy fight; it had an insuf- champion had been the idea all along) and the small details ficient delegate operation; it squandered vast sums of money; (campaign staffers in Portland, Oregon, kept tabs on Monica and the candidate herself evinced a paralyzing schizophrenia— Lewinsky, who lived there, to avoid any surprise encounters). one day a shots-’n’-beers brawler, the next a Hallmark Channel The second was the thought: Wow, it was even worse than I’d mom. Through it all, her staff feuded and bickered, while her imagined! The anger and toxic obsessions overwhelmed even husband distracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Guilty As Sin G U I LTY AS SIN
    Guilty as Sin G U I LTY AS SIN UNCOVERING NEW EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AND HOW HILLARY CLINTON AND THE DEMOCRATS DERAILED THE FBI INVESTIGATION EDWARD KLEIN Copyright © 2016 by Edward Klein All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, website, or broadcast. Regnery® is a registered trademark of Salem Communications Holding Corporation First e-book edition 2016: ISBN 978-1-62157-642-6 Originally published in hardcover, 2016: ISBN 978-1-62157-641-9 Cataloging-in-Publication data on file with the Library of Congress Published in the United States by Regnery Publishing A Division of Salem Media Group 300 New Jersey Ave NW Washington, DC 20001 www.Regnery.com Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Books are available in quantity for promotional or premium use. For information on discounts and terms, please visit our website: www. Regnery.com. Distributed to the trade by Perseus Distribution 250 West 57th Street New York, NY 10107 ALSO BY EDWARD KLEIN NONFICTION All Too Human: The Love Story of Jack and Jackie Kennedy Just Jackie: Her Private Years The Kennedy Curse: Why Tragedy Has Haunted America’s First Family for 150 Years Farewell, Jackie: A Portrait of Her Final Days The Truth about Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She’ll Go to Become President Katie: The Real Story Ted Kennedy: The Dream That Never Died The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House Blood Feud: The Clintons vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Clinton Emails Take Long Path to Controversy
    http://nyti.ms/1gmYzIi POLITICS Hillary Clinton Emails Take Long Path to Controversy By SCOTT SHANE and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT AUG. 8, 2015 WASHINGTON — Earlier this summer, the inspector general of the nation’s intelligence agencies contacted the longtime lawyer for Hillary and Bill Clinton with a pointed question. Classified information had been found in a small sample of 30,000 messages from the former secretary of state’s private email account. The inspector general, I. Charles McCullough III, wanted to know from the lawyer, David E. Kendall, where copies of the message collection might still be stored. Mr. Kendall’s answer, like so much in the story of the Clinton emails, pointed in an unexpected direction. The official communications of the nation’s 67th secretary of state, it turned out, were handled by a little Colorado I.T. company, Platte River Networks, previously best known for being honored in 2012 as Denver’s “small business of the year.” Last week, F.B.I. agents showed up at Platte River’s modest brick building, opposite a candy factory. Now that government secrets had been found in Mrs. Clinton’s email, the agents wanted to know about the company’s security measures. Whether Americans believe Mrs. Clinton’s decision to use only a private email account for her public business is a troubling scandal well worth an F.B.I. inquiry, a pragmatic move blown out of proportion by Republican enemies, or something in between, may depend more on their partisan leanings than the facts of the affair itself. But the email account and its confusing reverberations have become a significant early chapter in the 2016 presidential race and a new stroke in the portrait of the Democrats’ leading candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • FOIA) Document Clearinghouse in the World
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Received Received Request ID Requester Name Organization Closed Date Request Description Mode Date 16-F-0001 Grazier, Daniel Project On Government PAL 10/1/2015 - The full report titled “Force of the Future” that lists proposed Oversight changes to the DoD’s personnel management system as described in Andrew Tilghman’s 1 September 2015 Military Times story, “’Force of the Future’: career flexibility, fewer moves”. (Date Range for Record Search: From 08/01/2015 To 09/30/2015) 16-F-0002 Maziarz, Jessica Bryan Cave LLP Mail 10/1/2015 10/13/2015 [ ] 16-F-0003 Reichenbach, Sarah The National Security Archive PAL 10/1/2015 - All documents, including but not limited to cables, letters, memoranda, briefing papers, transcripts, summaries, notes, emails, reports, drafts, and intelligence documents relating in whole or in part to the introduction on June 22, 2004 and passing on July 22,2004 of concurrent House and Senate resolutions determining the situation in Darfur to be genocide (H. Con.Res. 467 and S. Con. Res. 133). 16-F-0004 Reichenbach, Sarah The National Security Archive PAL 10/1/2015 6/22/2016 All documents, including, but not limited to, cables, letters, memoranda, briefing papers, transcripts, summaries, notes, emails, reports, drafts, and intelligence documents related in whole or in part to the decision to send an Atrocities Investigation Team to the Chad/Sudan border to document atrocities in June 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr 1 2 20G5
    —/ . /' /f CX?b Jeff Gates 1440 Catalina Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 949.494.4437 March 31,2005 Mr. Mark Malloch Brown Office of the Secretary General United Nations New York, New York 10017 RE: Meeting with the Secretary General Please find enclosed the following materials that I hope prove useful, as follows: • Letter and memo of March 16, 2005 to Prime Minister Tony Blair confirming that Jerome Corsi, author of Atomic Iran (March 22nd release), has long operated as a Mossad asset. Note the inclusion of documentary evidence dating back to 1994 in correspondence with James M. Rockefeller and Dr. Glenn Olds. • E-mail from me to Governor Jeb Bush and President G.W. Bush confirming a March 20, 2005 death threat directed at Mr. Rockefeller in Miami. Based on the repetitive behavior patterns chronicled in the course of two^ye_ars of full- time_research, I am ccmfid_ent we can assist Mr, A^nanjn identifyin^g those who staged hjs_sonjo catalzye an incident .at this particular _time. Research uncovered numerous situations where pro-Israeli operatives have "taken position on" children and siblings of prominent or well-to-do people, often at a very young age. The targeting of Mr. Rockefeller (age 53) dates back at least to age six and perhaps earlier. Please ensure that Mr. Annan schedules time ASAP for a confidential discussion with Mr. Rockefeller and I. Fast-emerging fact patterns suggest that the Israelis are regrouping for yet another initiative as part of their commitment to wage way by way of deception, a key reason they first need to discredit the U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief FOIA Officer Weekly Report- January 2015
    Freedom of Information Act Activity from December 18, 2014 - January 7, 2015 Privacy Office January 12, 2015 Weekly Freedom of Information Act Report I. Efficiency and. Transparency- Steps taken to increase transparency and make forms and processes used by the general public more user-friendly, particularly web­ based and Freedom of Information Act related items: • On December 22, 2014, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) posted to the. ICE Freedom of Information Act Library under the Office of Detention Oversight-Detention Facility Compliance Inspections menu 2014 inspection closeout reports for the following facilities: (1) Lincoln County Detention Center (one page); and (2) Albany County Correctional Facility (two pages). • On December 30,. 2014, U.S. Immigration and Customs. Enforcement (ICE} posted to the. ICE Freedom of Information Act Library under the ICE Freedom of Information Act Logs menu the. following logs in Excel format: (1) November 2013~ (2) December 2013;. (3} January 2014;. (4) February 2014; and (5} March 2014. II. Freedom of Information Act Requests • On December 18,. 2014, Scott MacFarlane, a reporter with NBC 4 in Washington, DC, requested from the. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) records of correspondence between the Office of the Secretary and Governor Martin O'Malley (D-MD) in 2014. (Case Number 2015-HQF0-00149.) • On December 18, 2014, Shawn Musgrave, a representative with MuckRock News in Boston, Massachusetts, requested from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) a copy of the October 10, 2014 memorandum pertaining to the creation of an independent panel to conduct a review of the United States Secret Service. (USSS).
    [Show full text]
  • Communications with Rod Rosenstein
    Rosenstein, Rod (ODAG) From: Rosenstein, Rod (ODAG) Sent : Monday, May 22, 2017 3:39 PM To: Wroblewski, Jonathan; Morales, Michelle; Crowell, James (ODAG) Cc: Mann, James (CRM); Terwilliger, Zachary {OOAG) Subject : Meeting POC: Marcia Murphy, Nathalliel Gamble 202-514-2101 Atten-clees: ODAG,: DAG Rosenstein, James CroweU, Zach TerwilLiger CRM: Jamie Mann OPL: Jonathan Wroblew ski, Michelle Morales Judge Amy St 'Eve Hote: This meeting is limited to the invited attendees only. Yo u are not authori:ted to forward this invrta1ion. If you believe other ioclividuaJs should be included, please contact the ODAG Front Office. Document ID: 0.7.22218.197169 20190702-0000157 i@WM11riiffidt1ifif'if■-------------------------- From: (b)(6) Lisa Emsel. US Comis Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:17 PM To: Rosenstein, Rod (USAMD) Subject: Another name Rod, I don't know how far you have gotten, but another name you might consider with bipartisan credentials and relevant experience is _ _ Larry Silberman Document ID: 0.7.22218.38168 20190702-0003375 -•'(U_s_A_o_c)____________________ From: (b )(6) {USADC) Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 1:04 PM To: Raman, Sujit (ODAG); Cardwell, Christine (ODAG); Schools, Scott {ODAG); Rosenstein, Rod (OOAG) Ce: Atwe ll, Tonya (ODAG); Lofthus, Lee J (JMD) Subject: RE: Correspondence from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General Attachments: (b)( 6) Good afternoon: (b)(6) Thanks, (b)( 6) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the District ofColumbia Civil Division 555 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 (b)(6) From: Atw ell, Tonya (ODAG} (mai lto:[email protected]) Sent: Thursday, May 18, 201712:16 PM To: (b )(6) Subject: Correspondence from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General Importance: High Document ID: 0.7.22218.29598 20190702-0003385 Dear_ , Please see attached for correspondence from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General regarding your (b)(6) Please, confirm a receipt ofthese materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Ideas for Making IG Happen!
    50TH YEAR AN ARMA INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION MAY/JUNE 2016 Innovative Ideas for Making IG Happen! Page 20 Quarterbacking a PST Reduction Project: How to Get to the End Zone – No Matter the Opposition Page 24 Applying Archival Appraisal Concepts to Information Lifecycle Management Page 29 Don’t get burned by MISMANAGED INFORMATION. Your amount of sensitive customer and business data is doubling by the year. And a little loss could have a big impact on your bottom line. Now more than ever, the way you manage your company’s information matters. Find out where you stand with the Next Level Information Governance Assessment. Through this self-administered online assessment tool, you’ll discover areas of strength. You’ll also uncover opportunities for improvement. In the end, you will be empowered to increase your organizational transparency and data integrity. Start turning information into an asset by visiting arma.org/nextlevel. 50TH YEAR MAY/JUNE 2016 VOLUME 50 NUMBER 3 DEPARTMENTS 4 INFOCUS A Message from the Editor 6 UPFRONT News, Trends, and Analysis FEATURES 20 FELLOWSFORUM Innovative Ideas for Making IG Happen! Susan Cisco, Ph.D., CRM, FAI, and Sue Trombley, IGP, FAI 24 Quarterbacking a PST Reduction Project: How to Get to the End Zone – No Matter the Opposition 20 Ben Greene, CRM 29 Applying Archival Appraisal Concepts to Information Lifecycle Management Stephen Cohen, CRM SPOTLIGHTS 34 GOVERNMENTRECORDS Establishing a Duty to Document: The Foundation for Access to Information Marc Kosciejew, Ph.D. 38 BUSINESSMATTERS Systems Automation: A Way to Reduce RIM Risk 24 Joao Penha-Lopes, Ph.D. SPECIAL SECTION 42 50THYEAR 50, 25, 10 Years: A Look Back..
    [Show full text]
  • 8/25/08 Roger Simon, Politico's Chief Political Columnist, Has Been a Respected Name in American Journalism Since the 1970S —
    8/25/08 Roger Simon, Politico's chief political columnist, has been a respected name in American journalism since the 1970s — and an authoritative voice in American politics for just as long. After the historic contest between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama finally came to an end in June, Simon launched an intensive effort to get behind the scenes — and to the bottom — of what happened and why. He interviewed scores of well-placed people at all levels of both campaigns, many of whom have been sources of his for years. This project, which Simon named "Relentless" to reflect what he saw as the animating spirit of Obama's remarkable campaign, is the result of Simon's two years of reporting on this campaign, and decades of observing political personalities in action. – John F. Harris Introduction: The path to the nomination By: Roger Simon August 24, 2008 09:09 AM EST In the summer of 2006, Patti Solis Doyle offered David Axelrod a job. Hillary Clinton was running for reelection to the Senate and Solis Doyle was her campaign manager, but everybody knew Clinton was soon going to run for president. And Clinton wanted Axelrod onboard. Axelrod was a highly experienced and successful political consultant and just what Clinton needed. But he declined. Presidential campaigns were mentally taxing, physically exhausting and emotionally draining. There were easier ways to make a buck. Unless. “I wasn’t planning to work in a presidential race,” Axelrod told me, “but if Barack might run, well, he would be the only guy to cause me to get in.” It was not impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05795889 Date: 10/30/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 From: PIR <preines Sent: Friday, April 6, 2012 4:03 PM To: Cc: Huma Abedin Subject: Elle: "At the Pinnacle of Hillary Clinton's Career" At the Pinnacle of Hillary Clinton's Career Secretary of State Clinton has won over her harshest critics and become so popular that some Democrats are envisioning a future in which she replaces Joe Biden as vice president on the 2012 ticket and then—dare they imagine it—takes the top job in 2016. By Rachael Combe Elle Magazine April 05, 2012 I am late for a black-tie dinner, running down Manhattan's West Side Highway in a cocktail dress and bare feet, evening sandals clutched in one hand, a recorder and notebook in the other. In a covered garage at Chelsea Piers, I catch up to my mark—a string of town cars, SUVs, and police cars, lights blazing—just as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton steps onto the red carpet. Her entourage files into a curtained-off room to the side of the banquet hall, and her security detail waves me in behind them—I've been following her for a few weeks now, from Washington, DC, to Europe and now New York City. I'm frantically scanning the group for the State Department press aide, my eyes still adjusting to the darkened antechamber, when I practically walk into Secretary Clinton. She looks at me; I look at her.
    [Show full text]