DOCSLIB.ORG

Moths 1993-2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moths 1993-2003 QUAIL RIDGE MOTHS 1993-2003 Check # Name List No. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 unknown sp. #1 X 1 unknown sp. #2 X ERIOCRANIIDAE 14 2 Neocrania bifasciata Davis, 1978 X INCUVARIIDAE 221 1 Adela septentrionella Wlsm., 1880 X 224 4 Adela flammeusella Cham., 1876 X X 225 3 Adela trigrapha Zell, 1876 X X 1 Incuvariid sp. X TINEIDAE 266 1 Nemapogan granella (L., 1758) X 321 1 Hypoplesia dietziella Bsk., 1913 X 2 Amydria sp. XX 357 9 Acrolophus kearfooti (Dyar, 1903) O X X 359 12 Acrolophus laticapitanus (Wlsm., 1884) X X 403 3 Tinea occidentella Cham., 1880 X LYONETIIDAE 581 W 1 Bucculatrix sp. X OECOPHORIDAE 861 2 Agonopterix oregonensis Clarke, 1941 X 872 1 Agonopterix sabulella (Wlsm., 1881) X 979 11 Ethmia arctostaphyella (Wlsm., 1880) X OXXX 980 a 12 Ethmia discostrigella subcaerulea (Wlsm., 1880) XXXOXXO 1025 2 Antaeotricha manzanitae Keif., 1937 X X 1 Inga sp. X 1045 1 Decantha stonda Hodges, 1974 X 1074 1 Pleurota albastrigulella (Kft., 1907) X ELACHISTIDAE 1076 1 Coelopoeta glutinosi Wlsm., 1907 X BLASTOBASIDAE 1133 2 Symmoca signatella (H. - S., 1854) X 1 Hypatopa sp. X 1162 3 Blastobasis glandulella (Riley, 1871) X 1225 V 11 Blastobasid sp. X X X X 2 Holocera sp. #1 XX 2 Holocera sp. #2 X COSMOPTERIGIDAE 1531 1 Anonica sphacelina (Keif., 1935) X 1615 5 Walshia miscecolorella (Cham., 1875) X X 1 cosmopterigid sp. X GELECHIIDAE 1705 X 1 Isophrictis sp. X 1727 2 Aristotelia adenostomae (Keif., 1933) X 1730 6 Aristotelia argentifera Bsk., 1903 X 1769 1 Evippe laudatella (Wlsm., 1907) X 1786 X 3 Recurvaria "glenax" Hodges MS. X X X 1838 1 Exoteleia graphicella (Bsk., 1903) X 1859 5 Telphusa sedulitella (Bsk., 1910) X X X X 1861 4 Pseudochelaria manzanitae (Keif., 1930) X X X 1879 14 Xenolechia querciphaga Keif., 1933 X X X 2 Xenolechia sp. XX 1882 5 Teleiopsis baldiana (B. & Bsk., 1920) X X 1967 X 2 Gelechia sp. XX 2053 A 3 gnorimoschemine sp. XX 2058 25 Chionodes acrina (Keif., 1933) X X XXXXX 2065 1 Chionodes braunella (Keif., 1931) X 2083 1 Chionodes helicostictus (Meyr., 1929) X 2085 2 3 Chionodes johnstoni Clarke, 1947 X X 2098 2 4 Chionodes obelus Hodges, 1999 X X 2111 7 10 Chionodes restio Hodges, 1999 X X X X 2112 9 Chionodes retiniella (B. & Bsk., 1920) X X X 2120 9 Chionodes trichostola (Meyr., 1923) X X X X 1 Chionodes sp. X 2181 X 9 Filatima sp. #1 XXX 4 Filatima sp. #2 XXX 2186 X 1 Aroga sp. X 2208 4 Mirificarma eburnella (G. & S.) X 1 Gelechid sp. #1 X 1 Gelechid sp. #2 X 1 Gelechid sp. #3 X CARPOSINIDAE 2318 1 Bondia comonana (Kft., 1907) X 2320 1 Bondia shastana Davis, 1969 X PLUTELLIDAE 2351 7 Euceratia castella Wlsm., 1881 X X 2352 8 Euceratia securella Wlsm., 1881 X X 2357 4 Plutella albidorsella Wlsm., 1881 X X 2365 6 Plutella vanella Wlsm., 1885 X X 2372 10 Ypsolopha cerrella (Wlsm., 1881) X X X X SESIISAE 2576 2 Synanthedon bibionipennis (Bdv., 1869) X COSSIDAE 2669 3 Givera marga B. & McD., 1910 X X X 2 Comadia sp. XX 2693 b 7 Prionoxystus robiniae mixtus (Peck, 1818) X X X TORTRICIDAE 2707 2 Bactra verutana Zell., 1875 X 2872 1 Rhyacionia zozana (Kft., 1907 X 1 Rhyacionia sp. X 2896 9 Petrova sabiniana (Kft., 1907) XOXXOXX 3060 8 Eucosma subflavana (Wlsm., 1879) X X 3242 1 Zeiraphera fortunana (Kft., 1907) X 3256 16 Pseudaxentera habrosana (Heinr., 1923) X X X X 3285 1 6 Epinotia siskiyouensis Heinr., 1923 XX 3289 2 Epinotia johnsonana (Kft., 1907) X 3300 9 Epinotia subplicana (Wlsm., 1879) X X X 3319 6 Epinotia nigralbana (Wlsm., 1879) X X 3323 25 Epinotia emarginana (Wlsm., 1879) X X X X X X 3326 3 Epinotia begemina Heinr., 1923 X X X 3328 3 Epinotia arctostaphylana (Kft., 1904) X 3350 12 Epinotia kasloana McD., 1925 X X X X 3353 1 4 Epinotia signiferana Heinr., 1923 XX 3362 3 Ancylis columbiana (McD., 1955) X 3435 2 Grapholita conversana Wlsm., 1879 X X 3437 1 Grapholita lunatana Wlsm., 1879 X 3494 13 Melissopus latiferreana (Wlsm., 1879) X OXXXX 3502 3 Croesia albicomana (Clem., 1865) X 3560 `````Acleris foliana (Wls, 1879) X 3573 9 Decodes basiplagus (Wlsm., 1879) XXX 3574 18 Decodes fragarianus (Bsk., 1919) XX 3577 1 Decodes bicolor Powell, 1961 X 3583 6 Anopina triangulana (Kft., 1908) X X 3635 5 Choristoneura rosaceana (Harr., 1841) X X 3648 a 10 Archips argyrospila columbiana (McD., 1923) O X X 3713 7 Sparganothis tunicana (Wlsm., 1879) X X 3714 11 Sparganothis senecionana (Wlsm., 1879) X X 3736 2 Platynota stultana Wlsm., 1884 XX 3749 14 Amorbia cuneana (Wlsm., 1879) XXOXXX 3768 X 2 Saphonista sp. XX 3777 11 Henricus umbrabasanus (Kft., 1908) X XXXX 1 tortricid sp. X PYRALIDAE 4722 11 Eudonia rectilinea (Zell., 1874) X X X 4730 20 Eudonia spenceri Mun., 1972 X X 4735 a 12 Eudonia echo gartrelli Mun., 1972 XX 4775 5 Petrophila jaliscalis (Schaus, 1906) XXX 4826 a 1 Mimoschinia rufofascialis novalis X 4846 1 Hellula rogatalis (Hulst, 1886) X 4892 2 Dicymolomia metalliferalis (Pack., 1873) X 4909 1 Evergestis funalis (Grt., 1878) X 4976 7 Achrya occidentalis (Pack., 1906) O X X 4992 1 Uresipheta reversalis (Gn., 1854) X 5019 3 Pyrausta nexalis (Hulst, 1886) X X 5030 11 Pyrausta morealis (Dyar, 1908) XXXO 5033 1 Pyrausta grotei Mun., 1976 X 5052 5 Pyrausta californicalis (Pack., 1873) XXX 5054 5 Pyrausta dapalis (Grt., 1881) X 5060 c 2 Pyrausta subsequalis petaluma(Gn., 1854) XX 5064 7 Pyrausta perrubralis (Pack., 1873) X X X X 5067 1 Pyrausta semirubralis (Pack., 1873) X 5074 7 Pyrausta fodinalis (Led., 1863) X X X 5080 8 Udea profundalis (Pack., 1873) O X OXXXX 5099 1 Udea itysalis (Wlk., 1859) X 5107 6 Lineodes integra (Zell., 1873) XXXX 5129 4 Choristostigma zephyralis (B. & McD., 1914) X X 5132 11 Choristostigma egalantalis Warr., 1892 X X 5137 7 Mecyna mustelinalis (Pack., 1873) X X 5139 7 Mimorista subcostalis (Hamp., 1913) OXXXX 5156 7 Nemophila nearctica Mun., 1973 X X X X 5256 2 Diastictus fracturalis (Zell., 1872) X 5370 8 Crambus sperryellus Klots, 1940 XXX 5404 7 Agriphila attenuata (Grt., 1880) XX 5451 8 Parapediasia teterrella (Zinck., 1823) X 5455 8 Euchromius californicalis (Pack., 1873) X O X X 5514 6 Pyralis cacamica Dyar, 1913 XXX X 5517 3 Aglossa caprialis (Hbn., 1800-09) X X 5567 13 Arta epicoenalis Rag., 1891 XX 5585 8 Jocara trabalis (Grt., 1881) XOXX 5622 10 Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) XXX 5623 1 Achroia grisella (F., 1794) X 5637 1 Macrotheca angulalis B. & McD., X 5655 18 Acrobasis tricolorella Grt., 1878 OXXXXXX 5656 1 Acrobasis comptella Rag., 1887 X 5695 1 Trtachycera caliginella (Hulst, 1889) X 5720 11 Myelopsis alatella (Hulst, 1887) XXXX 5721 1 Apomyelois bistriatella (Hulst., 1887) X 5724 4 Amyelois transitella (Wlk., 1863) XX 5729 4 Anadelosemia condigna Heinr., 1956 XX 5730 3 Dasypyga alternosquamella Rag., 1887 X X X 5744 2 Etiella zinckenella (Tr., 1832) X 5755 6 Interjectio denticulella (Rag., 1887) X X 5772 1 6 Quasisalebria occidentalis (Neunzig, 1988) X X X 5801 4 Sciota bifasciella (Hulst, 1887) X X X 5812 13 Telethusia ovalis (Packard, 1873) X X 5815 9 Phobus funerellus (Dyar, 1925) X X 2 Pyla sp. XX 5846 9 Dioryctria auranticella (Grt., 1883) OOOXOXO 5852 2 9 Dioryctria fordi Donahue & Nuenzig, 2002 OXOXXX 15 Dioryctria sp. XX XXXXX 5901 1 Tacoma feriella Hulst, 1888 X 5922 1 Honora dotella Dyar, 1910 X 5935 11 Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst, 1887) XXXX 5946 1 6 Phycitodes albatella mucidella (Rag., 1887) X X X X 5966 9 Rhagea packardella (Rag., 1887) XXXX 5995 3 Euzophera semifuneralis (Wlk., 1863) X X X 6000 17 Ephestiodes gilvescentella Rag., 1887 X X X XXXXX 6007 1 12 Vitula serratileneella Ragonot, 1887 XOXXXXX 6017 3 Sosipatra thurberiae (Dyar, 1917) X X X 6020 12 Ephestia kuehniella Zell., 1879 XXOXXXXXX 3 phycitine sp. #1 XX 1 phycitine sp. #2 X 1 phycitine sp. #3 X 1 phycitine sp. #4 X 6 Pyralid sp. #1 X 2 pyralid sp. #2 X PTEROPHORIDAE 6100 3 Trichoptilus californicus (Wlsm., 1880) X X 6118 c 3 Amblyptilia pica sierrae (Lange, 1950) X X 6181 3 Hellinsia fieldi (W. S. Wright,1921) X 6182 3 Hellinsia confusus Braun, 1930 X X 6211 7 Hellinsia grandis (Fish, 1881) X X X 6234 4 Emmelina monodactyla (L., 1758) X X X X GEOMETRIDAE 6266 2 Protitame subalbaria (Pack., 1873) X X 6288 4 Itame quadrilinearia (Pack., 1873) X 6298 2 Itame extemporata B. & McD., 1917 X X 6301 12 Itame guenearia (Pack., 1876) XXXX 6323 10 Elpsite marcescaria (Gn., 1857) OXXXXX 6338 9 Semiothisa adonis (B. & McD., 1918) OXXXXXXO 6346 3 Semiothisa unipunctaria (W. S. Wright, 1916) X X X 6366 2 Semiothisa napensis McD., 1939 X X 6372 1 Semiothisa pictipennata (Hulst, 1898) X 6378 15 Semiothisa respersata (Hulst, 1880) XXXXXXXO 6380 20 Semiothisa californiaria (Pack., 1871) OXOXXXXXX 6395 1 Semiothisa irrorata (Pack., 1876) X 6396 1 Semiothisa neptaria (Gn., 1857) X 6431 18 Hesperumia sulphuraria Pack., 1873 X X O 6432 a 11 Hesperumia fumosaria impensa Rindge, 1974 X X 6433 11 Hesperumia latipennis (Hulst, 1896) X 6435 15 Neoalcis californiaria (Pack., 1871) XXOX 6553 24 Pterotaea lamiaria (Stkr., 1899) O X X 6566 16 Pterotaea albescens McD., 1941 X X O 6568 20 Pterotaea cariosa Hulst, 1896 XX 6575 a 10 Anacamptodes clivinaria impia Rindge, 1966 XXXOXX 6593 22 Anavitrinelia ocularia (B. & McD., 1917) XXXXXXX 6618 8 Melanolophia imitata (Wlk., 1860) O X X 6650 14 Cochisea sinuaria B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chionodes Scotodes
    Chionodes scotodes Chionodes formosella-complex. Chionodes abitus Hodges, 1999. Chionodes argentipunctella (Ely, 1910). Chionodes bicostomaculella (Chambers, 1872). Chionodes formosella (Murtfeldt, 1881). Chionodes fuscomaculella (Chambers, 1872). Chionodes hapsus Hodges, 1999. Chionodes iridescens Clarke, 1947. Chionodes percultor Hodges, 1999. Chionodes powelli Hodges, 1999. Chionodes suasor Hodges, 1999. Chionodes gilvomaculella-complex. Chionodes scotodes (Walsingham, 1911). The obscurusella species-group. Chionodes thoraceochrella-complex. CHIONODES Hübner 1825 - Valid Name abdominella Busck 1903 - Valid Name abella Busck 1903 - Valid Name abradescens Braun 1921 - Valid Name acerella Sattler 1967 - Valid Name acrina Keifer 1933 - Valid Name agriodes Meyrick 1927 - Valid Name apolectella Walsingham 1900 - Valid Name arenella Forbes 1922 - Valid Name argentipunctella Ely 1910 - Valid Name argosema Meyrick 1917 - Valid Name aristella Busck 1903 - Valid Name bastuliella Rebel 1931 -. Valid Name bicolor Clarke 1947 - Valid Name bicostomaculella Chambers 1872 - Valid Name * gibbosella Chambers 1873 - Junior subjective synonym * querci... Original publication details: Scientific Name of Taxon: scotodes. Original Rank: ? Current Status: Valid Name. Current Rank: SPECIES. Original Combination Chionodes scotodes Walsingham 1911. urn:lsid:insecta.pro:taxonomy:655999. Authors. * Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages. Chionodes scotodes photos. There are no photos of this species on the website yet. You can offer your photo by logging into your account. Other species Chionodes. Chionodes abdominella Busck 1903. Chionodes abella Busck 1903. Chionodes abradescens Braun 1921. Chionodes acerella Sattler 1967. Chionodes acrina Keifer 1933. Chionodes agriodes Meyrick 1927. Chionodes apolectella (Walsingham, 1900). Chionodes aprilella (Huemer & Sattler, 1995). Chionodes arenella Forbes 1922. Chionodes argentipunctella Ely 1 Chionodes is a genus of moths of the family Gelechiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Native Animals of RI
    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera on the Introduced Robinia Pseudoacacia in Slovakia, Central Europe
    Check List 8(4): 709–711, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Lepidoptera on the introduced Robinia pseudoacacia in PECIES S OF ISTS L Slovakia, Central Europe Miroslav Kulfan E-mail: [email protected] Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, Slovakia. Abstract: Robinia pseudoacacia A current checklist of Lepidoptera that utilize as a hostplant in Slovakia (Central Europe) faunalis provided. community. The inventory Two monophagous is based on species, a bibliographic the leaf reviewminers andMacrosaccus new unreported robiniella data and from Parectopa southwest robiniella Slovakia., and Thethe polyphagouslist includes 35pest Lepidoptera Hyphantria species cunea belonging to 10 families. Most species are polyphagous and belong to Euro-Siberian have subsequently been introduced to Slovakia. Introduction E. The area is a polygon enclosed by the towns of Bratislava, Robinia pseudoacacia a widespread species in its native habitat in southeastern North America. It was L.introduced (black locust, to orEurope false acacia),in 1601 is Komárno, Veľký Krtíš and Myjava. Ten plots were located in the southern part of the study area. Most were located in theThe remnant trophic ofgroups the original of the floodplain Lepidoptera forests larvae that found were (Chapman 1935). The first mention of planting the species distributed along the Danube and Morava rivers. (Keresztesiin Slovakia dates 1965). from Today, 1750, itwhen is widespread black locust wasthroughout planted (1986). The zoogeographical distribution of the species western,around the central, fortress eastern in Komárno and southern in southern Europe, Slovakia where followswere defined the arrangement following the give system by Reiprichof Brown (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Stenoma Catenifer Walsingham
    Avocado Seed Moth Screening Aid Stenoma catenifer Walsingham Hanna R. Royals1, Todd M. Gilligan1 and Steven C. Passoa2 1) Identification Technology Program (ITP) / Colorado State University, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology (S&T), 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 U.S.A. (Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]) 2) USDA-APHIS-PPQ, USDA-FS Northern Forest Research Station and Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212 U.S.A. (Email: [email protected]) This CAPS (Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey) screening aid produced for and distributed by: Version 2 20 January 2016 USDA-APHIS-PPQ National Identification Services (NIS) This and other identification resources are available at: http://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/taxonomic_services The avocado seed moth, Stenoma catenifer is one of the most important moth pests in avocado-growing regions of the world. Larvae feed on fruit flesh and burrow into the seed, producing large amounts of frass and causing the fruits to drop from the tree prematurely. Larval damage renders the fruits unfit for commercial sale, leading to significant economic losses. The avocado seed moth has only been recorded as feeding on members of the Lauraceae family, with Persea americana (avocado) as the major host and other secondary hosts: P. schiedeana (coyo), wild Persea spp., and Beilschmedia spp. California accounts for the majority of avocado production in the U.S., followed by Florida and Hawaii. Stenoma catenifer is a small moth with few distinguishing features Fig. 1. Dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) as an adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
    MOTHS OF UMATILLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: Results from 10 sites Sampled May 22-23, 2017 Dana Ross 1005 NW 30th Street Corvallis, OR 97330 (541) 758-3006 [email protected] SUMMARY Macro-moths were sampled from the Umatilla National Wildlife Refuge for a third time 22-23 May, 2017 as part of an ongoing pollinator inventory. Blacklight traps were deployed for a single night at ten sites representative of major plant communities in the McCormack and Paterson Units. A grand total of 331 specimens and 36 moth species were sampled. Of those, 17 species (47%) were documented from the refuge for the first time. In a somewhat larger geographical context, 21 species were recorded for the first (8), second (7) or third (6) time from Morrow County, Oregon while 4 species were documented for the first (1) or second (3) time from Benton County, Washington. INTRODUCTION National Wildlife Refuges protect important habitats for many plant and animal species. Refuge inventories have frequently included plants, birds and mammals, but insects - arguably the most abundant and species-rich group in any terrestrial habitat - have largely been ignored. Small size, high species richness and a lack of identification resources have all likely contributed to their being overlooked. Certain groups such as moths, however, can be easily and inexpensively sampled using light traps and can be identified by regional moth taxonomists. Once identified, many moth species can be tied to known larval hostplant species at a given site, placing both insect and plant within a larger ecological context. Moths along with butterflies belong to the insect Order Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Flachleibmotten) : 43-46, 3 Abb., Schwerin
    Virgo, Mitteilungsblatt des Entomologischen Vereins Mecklenburg 16. Jahrgang (2013), Heft 1: DEUTSCHMANN, U.: Die Kleinschmetterlinge Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns Teil 16 Depressariidae (Flachleibmotten) : 43-46, 3 Abb., Schwerin Die Kleinschmetterlinge Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns Teil 16 Depressariidae (Flachleibmotten) UWE DEUTSCHMANN Zusammenfassung Nr. Artname MV (BB) (SH) Im Verzeichnis der Schmetterlinge Deutschlands Semioscopis avellanella 2000 * + wurden bis 1999 von den 71 Arten der Familie 1668 (Hübner, 1793) Depressariidae, die in Deutschland nachgewiesen Semioscopis oculella -- + + wurden, insgesamt 32 Arten für das Bundesland 1669 (Thunberg, 1794) Mecklenburg-Vorpommern dokumentiert (GAEDI- Semioscopis steinkellner- 2011 * * CKE & HEINICKE 1999). In der vorliegenden Arbeit iana (Denis & stellt der Autor seine Beobachtungen nach 1980 bis 1670 Schiffermüller, 1775) einschließlich 2013 in Mecklenburg vor. Durch den Luquetia lobella (Denis 2013 * * 1674 & Schiffermüller, 1775) Autor konnten in den vergangenen Jahren bis 2013 Exaeretia allisella 1995 * * insgesamt 26 Arten bestätigt werden. Zwei weitere 1678 Stainton, 1849 Arten wurden für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern neu Agonopterix ocellana 1998 * * nachgewiesen. 1691 (Fabricius, 1775) Interessant sind auch die Nachweise aus Agonopterix assimilella 2013 * + Brandenburg und Schleswig-Holstein. Nach deren 1707 (Treitschke, 1832) Angaben könnten weitere 15 Arten in Mecklen- Agonopterix scopariella 2009 * + burg-Vorpommern vorkommen, da sie in Branden- 1715 (Heinemann, 1870) burg bzw. Schleswig-Holstein
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
    ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests.
    [Show full text]