DOCSLIB.ORG

ENTERPRISE NETWORK MAPPING STUDY in RWANDA Habib Tibrichu and Marie Rose Buykusenge Januay 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ENTERPRISE NETWORK MAPPING STUDY in RWANDA Habib Tibrichu and Marie Rose Buykusenge Januay 2009 EEEGL ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT AND EQUITY IN THE VIRUNGA LANDSCAPE OF THE GREAT LAKES ENTERPRISE NETWORK MAPPING STUDY IN RWANDA Habib Tibrichu and Marie Rose Buykusenge Januay 2009 A PROGRAM FUNDED BY THE HOWARD G. BUFFETT FOUNDATION Date: January 2009 Lead Executant: CARE Circulation: Public Program Contacts EEEGL Regional Coordination Office IGCP Regional Programme Coordinator International Gorilla Conservation Programme (IGCP) EEEGL Programme |AWF, FFI & WWF) CARE INTERNATIONAL Off UMUGANDA BOULEVARD Kachiru, Kigali B.P. 550 Opp. the Office of the General Prosecutor Kigali, Rwanda P.O. Box 931, Kigali, RWANDA Tel: + 250 58 31 47/ 48/ 49 Tel: +250 580465 | (fax) +250 580466 Page 2 of 2 January 28, 2009 [CARE INTERNATIONAL IN RWANDA] TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ......................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose of the Study ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Limitation of the Study .................................................................................................................................................. 7 STUDY FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................. 8 Upgrading the Mapping Study ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Strategic Project Partners ............................................................................................................................................ 19 STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE SCREENING AND SELECTION .................................................... 24 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ................................................................................. 27 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................................... 28 Annex 1: Terms of Reference .................................................................................................................................... 29 Annex 2: Individual Enterprise Network Mapping Summary .............................................................................. 33 Annex 2.1: Irish Potato Mapping Network ............................................................................................................. 34 Annex 2.2: Wheat Mapping Network ....................................................................................................................... 40 Annex 2.3: Pyrethrum Mapping Network ................................................................................................................ 46 Annex 2.4: Maize Mapping Network ........................................................................................................................ 52 Annex 2.5: Beekeeping Mapping Network .............................................................................................................. 58 Annex 2.6: Mushrooms Mapping Network ............................................................................................................. 64 Annex 2.7: Livestock Mapping Network ................................................................................................................. 71 Annex 2.8: Handicraft Mapping Network ............................................................................................................... 76 Annex 2.9: Fruits and Vegetables (Tree Tomato & Garlic) Mapping Network ................................................ 80 Annex 3: Stakeholder Matrix ...................................................................................................................................... 84 Annex 4: Proceeding of Stakeholders Meeting – Musanze District ..................................................................... 85 Annex 5: Project Area Map ...................................................................................................................................... 105 Annex 6: Profile of Consultants............................................................................................................................... 106 Annex 7: Study Work and Tools ............................................................................................................................. 107 Annex 8: List of People Consulted.......................................................................................................................... 112 Annex 9: List of References Consulted .................................................................................................................. 117 Enterprise Network Mapping Study | CARE RWANDA 2 January 28, 2009 [CARE INTERNATIONAL IN RWANDA] ACRONYMS EEEGL Enterprise, Environment, & Equity in the Virunga Landscape of the Great Lakes BDS Business Development Services NRM National Resource Management RADA Rwanda Agricultural Development Authority ENM Enterprise Network Mapping NGO Non Governmental Organization CSO Community Based Organization VSLA Village Savings and Loan Association DRC Democratic Republic of Congo IGCP International Gorilla and Conservation Programme RW Rwanda FRW Rwandans’ Francs RPSF Rwanda Private Sector Federation RBS Rwanda Bureau of Standards MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources RARDA Rwanda Animal Resource Development Authority RHODA Rwanda horticultural development agency RSSP Rural Sector Support Programme PA Protected Area FECAR Federation de Corts des Metiers des Artisans en province du Nord BRD Banque Rwandaise de Developpement COAMV Cooperative des Agriculteurs des Volcans ARDI Association Rwandaise Pour Le Developpement Integre REDO Rural Environment Development Organization MINICOM Ministry of Commerce GDP Gross Domestic Product MFI Micro Finance Institution MSME Micro Small and Medium Enterprises SME Small and Medium Enterprises MDG Millennium Development Goal Mt Metric Tone USD United States Dollar FOA Food and Agricultural Organization HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ISAR Agriculture Research Institute of Rwanda OPYRWA Office des Pyrethres au Rwanda ORTPN Office Rwanda du Toruisme et des Parcs Nationaux RWF Rwanda Franc SOTIRU Rwanda Wheat Processing Company SOPYRWA Socie’te’ de Pyrethre au Rwanda IABIKI Federation of Pyrethrum Growers COPEPEC Cooperative to Protect Environment and Social wellbeing of Mushroom Growers EDPRS Economic Development & Poverty Reduction Strategy PSTA Strategic Plan for Transformation of Agriculture FAV Federation of Honey Beekeepers COOPRAVAB Federation of Wheat Growers Enterprise Network Mapping Study | CARE RWANDA 3 January 28, 2009 [CARE INTERNATIONAL IN RWANDA] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and background Enterprise, Environment, and Equity in the Virunga Landscape of the Great Lakes (EEEGL) is a regional project operating in the Virunga Landscape in trans-boundary region of Rwanda, Uganda and DRC. The region is densely populated, mountainous area where livelihoods of local people are largely dependent on agricultural production and Natural Resource Management (NRM). EEEGL Rwanda is already supporting communities living at the districts bordering the protected area under the different project components. However, EEEGL intends to support 2-3 community-based enterprises beyond its ecotourism program. The implementation of the initiative shall be based on value chain development approach. In order to select the enterprises suitable for the project, Care International sub-contracted consultants to complete the enterprise mapping study which was developed in February 2008 by EEEGL management team in Rwanda. Study Findings The Enterprise Network Mapping (ENM) study (Feb 2008) was reviewed and the methodology was found to be good but the approach of the exercise did not provide the project with adequate information (i.e. description of the market, actors and their responsibilities, NRM related concerns, products and services, constraints, and opportunities, income analysis) to facilitate decision making process especially information needed to screen and select 2-3 promising enterprises using a well developed criteria. The Consultants used business service approach combined with value chain analysis approach to engage the stakeholders through participatory manner to collect additional information as means to update and complete
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial
    Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial Report Editors: Elliott Friedlander, Research Director Claude Goldenberg, Principal Investigator Stanford University Graduate School of Education Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial Compiled and Edited by Elliott Friedlander & Claude Goldenberg © 2016 The views and opinions stated in this report are that of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent the view of Rwanda Education Board, the Ministry of Education of Rwanda, Save the Children, or any other individuals or organizations affiliated with the project. All research contained in this report conducted in conjunction with Stanford’s appointed co-researcher at the Rwanda Education Board. Research activities in Rwanda were conducted with permission and under the supervision of: 1) The Directorate of Science, Technology, and Research in the Ministry of Education in Rwanda Reference: MINEDUC/S&T/0143/2013 2) The Rwanda National Ethics Committee Reference: 423/RNEC/2016 3) The Stanford Institutional Review Board (IRB) Protocol ID: 26580 For further information about the research, please contact the Research Director, Elliott Friedlander, at [email protected] or [email protected]. Recommended Citation for the Overall Report Friedlander, E. & Goldenberg, C. (eds.). (2016). Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a 2-year Randomized Control Trial. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Executive Summary The Learning Crisis Reading, writing, and literacy in general are foundational to modern education. Recognizing the importance of literacy development and education more broadly, the global community came together in recent decades and committed enormous resources to ensuring all children globally had access to primary education.
    [Show full text]
  • EMP 30 110 Substation at Rulindo and Rehabilitation of 60Km 30Kv
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Infrastructure ENERGY WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Electricity Access Rollout Programme (EARP) Head Office: Avenue de l’ Ihema, P.O.Box 537, Kigali-Rwanda Tel: (250) 598202 or 573666 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ewsa.rw PROJECT BRIEF FOR THE REHABILITATION OF A 30/110kV SUBSTATION AT RULINDO AND 60KM 30kV DISTRIBUTION LINE FROM RULINDO TO BYUMBA AND GATUNA August 2011 1 0. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 5 I.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7 I.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................... 7 I.3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................... 8 I.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 8 Outdoor Switchyard 110kV ............................................................................................. 9 Transformer Bay 110/30 kV .......................................................................................... 9 Power transformer 110/30kV 10MVA YN0d11 ................................................... 11 Indoor Switchgear 30kV ................................................................................................ 11 • One (1) incoming feeder
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions June 2012
    RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions June 2012 MAP OF REVISED LIVELIHOOD ZONES IN RWANDA FEWS NET Washington FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The content of this report does not [email protected] necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International www.fews.net Development or the United States Government. RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of Revised Livelihood Zones in Rwanda............................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Rural Livelihood Zones in Rwanda ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Lake Kivu Coffee & Food Crops (Zone 1) ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Zone 1: Seasonal calendar ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief: Rwanda – DRC Cross Border Dynamics, April 2019
    Social Science in Humanitarian Action www.socialscienceinaction.org Brief: Rwanda – DRC cross border dynamics, April 2019 This brief summarises key considerations concerning cross-border dynamics between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in the context of the outbreak of Ebola in North Kivu and Ituri provinces. It is the second in a series of four briefs focusing on the at risk border areas between DRC and the four high priority neighbouring countries (including Uganda, South Sudan and Burundi).1 As of April 2019, there had been no case of Ebola imported from the DRC into Rwanda, although alerts had been triggered on the roads leading from North Kivu towards neighbouring Rwanda and at least one high-risk contact was described as being a Rwandan national. Cross-border movement has been identified as a significant risk to transmission. This brief provides details about cross-border relations, the political and economic dynamics likely to influence these, and specific areas and actors most at risk. The brief is based on a rapid review of existing published and grey literature, previous ethnographic research in Rwanda and DRC, and informal discussions with colleagues from the Rwanda Ministry of Health, UNHCR, UNICEF, WHO, DFID, IOM, USAID, CDC and others. The brief was developed by Hugh Lamarque (The University of Edinburgh’s Social and Political Science Department - Centre for African Studies) with support from Ingrid Gercama, Emelie Yonally and Juliet Bedford (Anthrologica). Additional review and inputs were provided by Patricia Stys (London School of Economics), Jean-Benoît Falisse (University of Edinburgh), Benjamin Chemouni (University of Cambridge), David Peyton (Northwestern University), Papy Muzuri (London School of Economics) and colleagues from DFID (Rwanda Country Office) and UNICEF (Rwanda Country Office and East and Southern Africa Regional Office).
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Cross-Border Agricultural Trade Analysis
    Enabling EAT Agricultural Trade RWANDA CROSS-BORDER AGRICULTURAL TRADE ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 2013 This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development by the USAID – Enabling Agricultural Trade (EAT) project, implemented by Fintrac Inc. RWANda CROSS-BORDER AGRICULTURAL TRADE ANALYSIS FebruarY 2013 ABOUT THE ENABLING AGRICULTURAL TRADE (EAT) PROJECT The Enabling Agricultural Trade (EAT) project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and implemented by Fintrac Inc., supports the US government’s global efforts to create conditions for agricultural growth. USAID established EAT based on substantial academic and field experience suggesting that a sound legal, regulatory, and institutional environment is a prerequisite to economic growth in the agricultural sector. EAT offers a suite of targeted and customizable analytical tools to support the startup and growth of businesses across the agricultural sector. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ACRONYMS AMIS Agricultural Marketing Information System APHLIS African Post-Harvest Loss Information System CET Common External Tariff CIP Crop Intensification Program COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo EAC East African Community EDPRS Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy EICV3 Third Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:213 Mission in Rwanda
    Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2017/18 Vote:213 Mission in Rwanda QUARTER 2: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q2 by End Q 2 End Q2 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 0.395 0.198 0.198 0.186 50.0% 47.1% 94.2% Non Wage 1.840 0.920 0.920 1.015 50.0% 55.2% 110.3% Devt. GoU 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.110 100.0% 55.0% 55.2% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 2.435 1.318 1.318 1.311 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% Total GoU+Ext Fin 2.435 1.318 1.318 1.311 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% (MTEF) Arrears 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total Budget 2.435 1.318 1.318 1.311 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% A.I.A Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grand Total 2.435 1.318 1.318 1.311 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% Total Vote Budget 2.435 1.318 1.318 1.311 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1652 Overseas Mission Services 2.44 1.32 1.31 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% Total for Vote 2.44 1.32 1.31 54.1% 53.9% 99.5% Matters to note in budget execution The Budget was executed as planned in the annual work plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in the Context of the Rwandan Crisis By
    REBELLION AND DIPLOMACY IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RWANDAN CRISIS BY OKECHUKWU GROUPSON-PAUL UC B.Sc. M.SC. (AWKA) (Matric No: 104609) A thesis in the Department of Political Science submitted to the Faculty of the Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Ibadan MARCH, 2012. i CERTIFICATION I certify that this dissertation entitled: Rebellion and Diplomacy in International Politics in the Context of the Rwandan Crisis was carried out by OKECHUKWU GROUPSON - PAUL UC, Matric No.104609 in the Department of Political Science, University of Ibadan, and is in conformity with the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Political Science, University of Ibadan. ___________________________ _______________________ Prof. Femi Otubanjo Date B.A. (Ife), Ph.D ( Wales), M.Sc. (London), Supervisor Department of Political Science University of Ibadan ii DEDICATION This work is affectionately dedicated, with immense thanks, to God for a successful endeavour. Also, I dedicate it to my ever-loving wife, Mrs Prisca Chinyere Okechukwu and our children, Emmanuella Kamsiyorchukwu Kinsella, Daniella Chimnaechelum Chimdimma Prisca and Chukwumdubem Groupson – Emmanuel. Finally, I solemnly dedicate this work to the over one million Rwandans who were exterminated during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of people must be acknowledged for their contributions to the success of this thesis. First and foremost, my greatest, appreciation thanks go to the Almighty God, the shaker and mover of all things, for His mercy, protection, support and blessings. I am also indebted to my research supervisor Professor Femi Otubanjo, who, in spite of other pressing engagements, paid considerable attention to the drafts and offered useful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT BRIEF Transmission and Distribution for GICUMBI And
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Infrastructure ENERGY WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Electricity Access Rollout Programme (EARP) Head Office: Avenue de l’ Ihema, P.O.Box 537, Kigali-Rwanda Tel: +(250)252573666 Fax: +(250)(0)252573802 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ewsa.rw PROJECT BRIEF FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES FOR GICUMBI AND GIKOMERO December 2011 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ 5 0. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 6 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 8 I.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 8 I.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................... 8 I.3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................ 9 I.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................10 Description of Works ..................................................................................................... 10 Line Profiling ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Research on the Cross-Border Transport Infrastructure: Phase 3 Table of Contents
    No. The Research on the Cross‐Border Transport Infrastructure: Phase 3 Final Report March 2009 Japan International Cooperation Agency PADECO Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co., Ltd EID JR 09-059 The Research on the Cross‐Border Transport Infrastructure: Phase 3 Final Report March 2009 Japan International Cooperation Agency PADECO Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co., Ltd PREFACE In 2003, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) conducted the “Research on the Experience and Perspective of ODA on Infrastructure Development in the Developing Countries” in which the role of infrastructure was redefined and issues in infrastructure development for future JICA assistance were identified. Based on this study’s results, two research studies were then conducted: (i) the “PPP (Public-Private Partnership) Project Study” in 2004 and (ii) the “Research on Program Management: Guide for the Application of P2M to JICA Activities”, from 2003 to 2005, with the aim of reducing the infrastructure gap and taking an integrated approach to infrastructure development. Since addressing cross-border infrastructure gaps was identified as one of the solutions to reducing infrastructure gaps, a Phase 1 research study on cross-border transport infrastructure was conducted from October 2005 to July 2006. It examined the progress of regionalization from a global perspective and summarized the major characteristics of cross-border transport infrastructure. JICA continued with a Phase 2 project, “Research on the Cross-Border Transportation Infrastructure: Targeting the GMS [the Greater Mekong Subregion of Southeast Asia]”, from November 2006 to December 2007, which examined current conditions, identified cross-border transport infrastructure issues, and assessed future directions for JICA assistance in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihoods Zoning “Plus” Activity in Rwanda
    LIVELIHOODS ZONING “PLUS” ACTIVITY IN RWANDA A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) August 2011 LIVELIHOODS ZONING “PLUS” ACTIVITY IN RWANDA A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) August 2011 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 1 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 National Livelihood Zone Map 6 Livelihoods Key Points 7 Rural Livelihood Zones Descriptions 9 Livelihood Zone 1: Lake Kivu Coffee Zone 9 Livelihood Zone 2: West Congo-Nile Crest Tea Zone 11 Livelihood Zone 3: Northwest Volcanic Irish Potato Zone 14 Livelihood Zone 4: East Congo-Nile Highland Farming Zone 17 Livelihood Zone 5: Central Plateau Cassava and Coffee Zone 20 Livelihood Zone 6: Northern Highlands Beans and Wheat Zone 22 Livelihood Zone 7: Central-Northern Highlands Irish potato, Beans and Vegetable Zone 24 Livelihood Zone 8: Bugesera Cassava Zone 26 Livelihood Zone 9: Eastern Plateau Mixed Agriculture Zone 29 Livelihood Zone 10: Southeastern Plateau Banana Zone 31 Livelihood Zone 11: Eastern Agro-Pastoral Zone 33 Livelihood Zone 12: Eastern Semi-Arid Agro-Pastoral Zone 36 Annex One: Sector by Livelihood Zone 38 Annex Two: Workshop Participants 48 2 Acknowledgments This work was done by Famine Early Warning Systems Network in collaboration with its partners Government of Rwanda’s Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Disaster Management, Ministry of Local Government, National Institute of Statistics, and National University of Rwanda, Catholic Relief Services, Rwandan Red Cross, Care and World Vision.
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINAL ORDER SERIES S-Iolo'l BOX '2-2- FILE {P Ace
    Ut-JAMIR. HAC - 0 PE RAT l 0 t--J TU RQ.UO is e [I DtC 1993] - q MA~ 'i9~ CON F IDI:=:::NTI q L- PLEASE RETAIN UN ARCHIVES ORIGINAL ORDER SERIES S-IOlO'L BOX '2-2- FILE {p Ace. lct~CO/0282. .. ./1I UN RESTRICTED SECTION 9 - COHQYCT Of THE MEETIBGS 18. As has been stated often, the two Rwandan Parties involved in the conflict see each other with suspicion and distrust. It was one of ONAMIR mandates to establish contact and liaison between the two Parties. In spite of the two Parties LOs deployed together with UNMLO, there is rarely, if ever a direct dealing between the Parties. It is organized through the JMC. During the past, incidents of cease-fire violations and attacks by some of the Parties have been innumerable. In such an environment, it is quite likely that UNAMIR forces will have to organize and manage the transfer of personnel, goods and other items from one Party to the other or may be to arrange special meetings between the two Parties. 19. Such transfers or special meetings can lead to extremely sensitive situations, where suspicion and mistrust allow little leeway for bad planning. Where small incidents can escalate, and where lack of information on a continuing basis can quickly be misinterpreted. Such operations require a good and simple plan cleared in advance with both or all Parties involved, and liaison and passage of information throughout. 20. The SOP lays down a set of guidelines for conduct of such sensitive meetings by UNAMIR forces.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Stop Border Posts in East Africa: State Encounters of the Fourth Kind
    Journal of Eastern African Studies ISSN: 1753-1055 (Print) 1753-1063 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjea20 One-stop border posts in East Africa: state encounters of the fourth kind Paul Nugent & Isabella Soi To cite this article: Paul Nugent & Isabella Soi (2020): One-stop border posts in East Africa: state encounters of the fourth kind, Journal of Eastern African Studies, DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2020.1768468 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1768468 Published online: 26 May 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjea20 JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1768468 One-stop border posts in East Africa: state encounters of the fourth kind Paul Nugent a and Isabella Soi b aCentre of African Studies and History, University of Edinburgh, UK; bDipartimento di Scienze Politiche e Sociali, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Across Africa, One-Stop Border Posts are being rolled out as part of a Received 22 November 2018 continental/ regional integration agenda that seeks to facilitate the Accepted 4 May 2020 movement of people and goods. This article focuses on four OSBPs KEYWORDS in East Africa and addresses the question, firstly, of how far they One-Stop border Posts; make a break with entrenched operational patterns within boundaries; customs; government bureaucracies, and secondly whether they represent immigration; bureaucracy; a distinct type of border management regime? The article finds trade; freedom of movement; that while there has been progress on data sharing in Customs, governance the construction and management of OSBPs reflects the persistence of distinct institutional cultures within each country.
    [Show full text]