Pharmacokinetics of Oral Pridinol: Results of a Randomized, Crossover Bioequivalence Trial in Healthy Subjects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Pridinol: Results of a Randomized, Crossover Bioequivalence Trial in Healthy Subjects International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 59 – No. 6/2021 (471-477) Pharmacokinetics of oral pridinol: Results of a randomized, crossover bioequivalence trial in healthy subjects Original Maren Richter1, Frank Donath1, Ralph-Steven Wedemeyer2, André Warnke1, 3 3 ©2021 Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle Andreas Horstmann , and Claudia Peschel ISSN 0946-1965 DOI 10.5414/CP203900 1SocraTec R&D GmbH, Oberursel/Erfurt, 2SocraMetrics GmbH, Erfurt, and e-pub: April 9, 2021 3Strathmann GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany Key words Abstract. Objectives: To establish the What is known about this subject bioavailability – bio- relative bioavailability and to assess bio- equivalence – immedi- equivalence of oral, immediate-release tab- – The anticholinergic agent pridinol has ate-release tablet – lets containing pridinol and to determine been used as a muscle relaxant for de- pharmacokinetics the pharmacokinetic properties of the com- cades. – pridinol pound. Methods and materials: In this single- – However, the published literature on the center, open-label, randomized, crossover pharmacology of pridinol is sparse. trial, healthy male and female adult subjects received single doses of the test and refer- – More accessible information on the cha- ence product containing 4 mg pridinol me- racteristics of pridinol, e.g., its pharma- sylate (equivalent to 3 mg pridinol) each cokinetics in humans, is needed. under fasting conditions. For pharmacoki- netic evaluation, blood samples were with- What this study adds drawn until 72 hours post dose. Pridinol in plasma was quantified by validated liquid – This is the first detailed report on the chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass pharmacokinetic properties of pridinol in spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Adverse events humans, assisting the prescriber to make (AEs) were analyzed descriptively. Results: Of 34 randomized subjects, 33 completed informed treatment decisions. all treatments. The determined pharmaco- – Bioequivalence of two oral, immediate- kinetic parameters were quite similar for release pridinol products was demon- both products, with geometric means for strated. maximum exposure (Cmax) of 29.27 ng/mL (test) and 27.44 ng/mL (reference), reached after 1.00 and 0.90 hours (mean tmax), re- spectively. The extents of bioavailability Introduction (geometric mean AUC0–tlast) were 187.93 h×ng/mL (test) and 183.51 h×ng/mL (refer- Pridinol, a centrally acting muscle relax- ence). Elimination half-lives (T1/2) ranged ant, attenuates polysynaptic reflexes via an from 8.97 to 34.85 hours with comparable anticholinergic mechanism [1, 2]. The com- mean T1/2 of 19.14 hours (test) and 18.85 pound had been used as a muscle relaxant hours (reference). The point estimates of for decades and is available as a single agent the test/reference-adjusted geometric mean for instance in Germany and Italy. However, ratios of AUC0–tlast, Cmax (primary), and the German product (Myoson direct tablets, Received AUC0–∞ (secondary) were 102.54% (90% September 17, 2020; confidence interval: 96.19 – 109.32%), Strathmann, Hamburg, Germany) was with- accepted 106.79% (99.00 – 115.20%), and 102.60% drawn from the market in January 2016 due January 17, 2021 (96.20 – 109.43%), respectively. Overall, 23 to regulatory reasons. Based on the results of subjects experienced 50 AEs; headache and the present study, pridinol-containing tablets Correspondence to dizziness (15 cases each) were most frequent- Claudia Peschel, MD ly reported. Conclusion: Bioequivalence of were again authorized in Germany in De- Strathmann GmbH & both pridinol products was demonstrated in cember 2017 (brand name: Myopridin 3 mg Co. KG, Langengorner terms of rate and extent of absorption. Safety tablets, Strathmann, Hamburg, Germany) for Chaussee 602, 22419 and tolerability were in accordance with the treatment of central and peripheral muscle Hamburg, Germany known AE profile of the drug substance. Claudia.peschel@ spasms, torticollis, lumbago, and general dermapharm.com muscle pain in adults [2]. In 2020, pridinol Richter, Donath, Wedemeyer, et al. 472 tablets were approved based on Myopridin as Drug products reference in further European countries such as the United Kingdom, Poland, and Spain. Clinical trial batches of the test (Myo- Skeletal muscle relaxants are a heteroge- son direct, Strathmann, Hamburg, Germany) nous drug class used for treatment of central and the reference product (Lyseen, Novartis muscle spasms (spasticity), e.g., after stroke, Consumer Health, Origgio, Italy) were man- and peripheral musculoskeletal spasms such ufactured according to good manufacturing as those arising from low back pain [1]. In practice (GMP) standards and were selected the indication spasticity, pridinol adds to the in accordance with European requirements armamentarium of available muscle relax- for bioequivalence trials [9]. The reference ants including tizanidine, baclofen, and tol- product, registered in Italy, was purchased perisone [3, 4, 5]. Of note, in Germany, pridi- from the Italian market. nol is currently – besides methocarbamol [6] Both products were divisible, immedi- – the only approved muscle relaxant for treat- ate-release tablets containing 4 mg pridinol ment of peripheral muscle spasms associated mesylate corresponding to 3 mg pridinol with low back pain [2], a highly debilitating per tablet as active ingredient. The qualita- condition with an estimated prevalence rate tive composition of the test product included between 1.4% and 15.6% [7]. highly dispersed silicon dioxide, hydroge- The published literature on pridinol is nated castor oil, lactose monohydrate, mag- sparse. According to the summary of product nesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, characteristics, pridinol reaches its maximum polyvinylpyrrolidone, and talcum. Excipi- plasma concentration within 1 hour after oral ents of the reference product were lactose, administration and is evenly distributed in starch, talcum, and glycerol dibehenate. tissues [2]. It is metabolized primarily via In-vitro dissolution was analyzed ac- cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP2B6 cording to the Guideline on the Investiga- [internal data] to its main metabolite 4-hy- tion of Bioequivalence [10]. Basket dis- droxypridinol [8]. Pridinol is renally elimi- solution testing (37 °C, 100 rpm, 500 mL) nated as unchanged drug and as glucuroni- at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8 revealed a very dated or sulfoconjugated drug [2]. rapid release with comparable drug re- The primary objective of the present lease rates of 98.5 – 100.4% (test product) study was to assess the bioequivalence of and 98.1 – 99.9% (reference product) after two oral pridinol formulations after single- 15 minutes. dose administration under fasting conditions. The secondary objectives included the deter- mination of pridinol’s pharmacokinetic char- Study conduct acteristics and the assessment of its safety and tolerability. The single-center, open-label, rando- mized (order of treatments), single-dose, crossover trial was conducted from May to Materials and methods July 2016. Study participants In each period of the trial, the subjects were administered either 1 tablet of the test In the study, healthy male or female sub- or reference product in the morning after an jects, aged ≥ 18 years, of Caucasian ethnicity overnight fasting period of 8 hours (no food, were included. The subjects had a body mass no beverages, only water was allowed until index of 18.5 – 30.0 kg/m2 and were non- 1 hour prior to dosing). The use of any sys- smokers or ex-smokers for at least 3 months. temically available medication except hor- Pregnant or breast-feeding women were ex- monal contraceptives was not allowed. Simi- cluded. Furthermore, subjects with contrain- larly, specific foods known to interact with dications to pridinol and/or conditions that metabolizing enzymes (CYP450, P-glycopro- might have an impact on the pharmacoki- tein), e.g., grapefruit/pomelo-containing food netics of the compound were excluded. All or beverages, star fruit-containing food or subjects provided written informed consent beverages, St. John’s wort, Brussels sprouts, before enrollment. or broccoli were not permitted. Pharmacokinetics of oral pridinol 473 Blood samples were collected over 72 Bioanalytical method hours. This time span was considered ade- validation and sample analysis quate to obtain a reliable estimate of the extent of absorption, i.e., the area under the Pridinol in plasma was quantified by curve (AUC) derived from measurements liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/ was expected to cover at least 80% of the mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) after vali- AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–∞). dation according to the Guideline on Bio- Since the elimination half-life of pridinol analytical Method Validation [9]. Diphenidol ranged between 3.89 and 24.99 hours in a hydrochloride served as internal standard. previous pilot study (Strathmann, Study CPA The established lower and upper limits of 139-01, 2002, unpublished), and since indi- quantitation for pridinol were 0.0500 ng/mL vidual values of up to 30.5 hours were known and 50 ng/mL, respectively. Precision (coef- from smaller earlier trials (internal data), the ficient of variation (CV): ≤ 4.5%) and accu- washout phase between the 2 treatment pe- racy (percentage relative deviation from nor- riods lasted 13 days to ensure that the drug mal value (RD): ≤ ± 6.6%) during analysis was virtually completely eliminated from the of the trial samples were in accordance with body prior to subsequent application.
Recommended publications
  • Microneedle Device and Transdermal Administration Device Provided with Microneedles
    (19) & (11) EP 2 005 990 A9 (12) CORRECTED EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art. 153(4) EPC (15) Correction information: (51) Int Cl.: Corrected version no 1 (W1 A1) A61M 37/00 (2006.01) A61B 17/20 (2006.01) Corrections, see A61K 9/00 (2006.01) A61K 47/34 (2006.01) Search report Search Report replaced or added (86) International application number: PCT/JP2007/057737 (48) Corrigendum issued on: 29.07.2009 Bulletin 2009/31 (87) International publication number: WO 2007/116959 (18.10.2007 Gazette 2007/42) (43) Date of publication: 24.12.2008 Bulletin 2008/52 (21) Application number: 07741173.4 (22) Date of filing: 06.04.2007 (84) Designated Contracting States: • MATSUDO, Toshiyuki AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki 305-0856 (JP) HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE • KUWAHARA, Tetsuji SI SK TR Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki 305-0856 (JP) (30) Priority: 07.04.2006 JP 2006106995 (74) Representative: Westendorp, Michael Oliver Splanemann Reitzner (71) Applicant: Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. Baronetzky Westendorp Tosu-shi, Saga 841 (JP) Rumfordstrasse 7 D-80469 München (DE) (72) Inventors: • TOKUMOTO, Seiji Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki 305-0856 (JP) (54) MICRONEEDLE DEVICE AND TRANSDERMAL ADMINISTRATION DEVICE PROVIDED WITH MICRONEEDLES (57) The present invention provides a microneedle device having a coating, which is effective even with a low molecular weight active compound and can sustain the effect of the drug for a long period of time, and a transdermal drug administration apparatus with micro- needles.
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Affinity Profiles of Hexahydro-Sila-Difenidol Analogues at Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes
    European Journal of Pharmacology, 168 (1989) 71-80 71 Elsevier EJP 50940 Affinity profiles of hexahydro-sila-difenidol analogues at muscarinic receptor subtypes 1 Günter Lambrecht *,Roland Feifel, Monika Wagner-Röder, Carsten Strohmann , 1 1 2 2 Harald Zilch , Reinhold Tacke , Magali Waelbroeck , Jean Christophe , Hendrikus Boddeke 3 and Ernst Mutschier Department of Pharmacology, University of Frankfurt, D-6000 Frankfurt/ M, F.R.G., 1 Institute of Jnorganic Chemistry, University of Karlsruhe, D-7500 Karlsruhe, F.R.G., 1 Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Medica/ Schoo/, Free University of Brussels, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium, and 1 Preclinical Research, Sandoz Ltd., CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland Received 20 Apri11989, accepted 13 June 1989 In an attempt to assess the structural requirements of hexahydro-sila-difenidol for potency and selectivity, a series of analogues modified in the amino group and the phenyl ring were investigated for their affinity to muscarinic M1- (rabbit vas deferens), Mr (guinea-pig atria) and Mr (guinea-pig ileum) receptors. All compounds were competitive antagonists in the three tissues. Their affinities to the three muscarinic receptor subtypes differed by more than two orders of magnitude and the observed receptor selectivities were not associated with high affinity. The pyrrolidino and hexamethyleneimino analogues, compounds substituted in the phenylring with a methoxy group or a chlorine atom as weil as p-fluoro-hexahydro-difenidol displayed the same affinity profile as the parent compound, hexahydro-sila-difen­ idol: M1 =M 3 > M 2 • A different selectivity patternwas observed for p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol: M3 > M1 > M 2 • This compound exhibited its highest affinity for M3-receptors in guinea-pig ileum (pA 2 = 7.84), intermediate affinity for M1-receptors in rabbit vas deferens (pA 2 = 6.68) and lowest affinity for the Mrreceptors in guinea-pig atria (pA 2 = 6.01).
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibited Substances List
    Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR). Neither the List nor the EADCM Regulations are in current usage. Both come into effect on 1 January 2010. The current list of FEI prohibited substances remains in effect until 31 December 2009 and can be found at Annex II Vet Regs (11th edition) Changes in this List : Shaded row means that either removed or allowed at certain limits only SUBSTANCE ACTIVITY Banned Substances 1 Acebutolol Beta blocker 2 Acefylline Bronchodilator 3 Acemetacin NSAID 4 Acenocoumarol Anticoagulant 5 Acetanilid Analgesic/anti-pyretic 6 Acetohexamide Pancreatic stimulant 7 Acetominophen (Paracetamol) Analgesic/anti-pyretic 8 Acetophenazine Antipsychotic 9 Acetylmorphine Narcotic 10 Adinazolam Anxiolytic 11 Adiphenine Anti-spasmodic 12 Adrafinil Stimulant 13 Adrenaline Stimulant 14 Adrenochrome Haemostatic 15 Alclofenac NSAID 16 Alcuronium Muscle relaxant 17 Aldosterone Hormone 18 Alfentanil Narcotic 19 Allopurinol Xanthine oxidase inhibitor (anti-hyperuricaemia) 20 Almotriptan 5 HT agonist (anti-migraine) 21 Alphadolone acetate Neurosteriod 22 Alphaprodine Opiod analgesic 23 Alpidem Anxiolytic 24 Alprazolam Anxiolytic 25 Alprenolol Beta blocker 26 Althesin IV anaesthetic 27 Althiazide Diuretic 28 Altrenogest (in males and gelidngs) Oestrus suppression 29 Alverine Antispasmodic 30 Amantadine Dopaminergic 31 Ambenonium Cholinesterase inhibition 32 Ambucetamide Antispasmodic 33 Amethocaine Local anaesthetic 34 Amfepramone Stimulant 35 Amfetaminil Stimulant 36 Amidephrine Vasoconstrictor 37 Amiloride Diuretic 1 Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR).
    [Show full text]
  • Solubilization of the Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor by I Sodium Cholate: Stabilization of the Receptor by Muscarinic Hgands
    \ i Biomedical Research 3 (6) 695-698, 1982 Solubilization of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor by I sodium cholate: Stabilization of the receptor by muscarinic Hgands TATSUYA HAGA, TOSHIHIDE NUKADA and KAZUKO HAGA Department of Biochemistry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-31, Japan ABSTRACT Forty to fifty percent of the muscarinic receptor in membrane preparations of porcine caudate nucleus was solubilized by sodium cholate in its active form when the mem- branes were pretreated with carbamylcholine or other muscarinic ligands. The binding activity of solubilized receptors was assayed by using [3H]quinuclidinylben- zylate ([3H]QNB) after removal of cholate and carbamylcholine. Without the pre- treatment, sodium cholate abolished most of the binding activity. The solubilized receptor had a high afiinity for [3H]QNB with a dissociation constant of 58 pM and an affinity for muscarinic ligands similar to that of the membrane receptor. The muscarinic receptor has been studied in —80°C until use. In the standard procedure of detail with respect to its binding with muscarinic solubilization, the microsomal preparation ligands by using [3H]-labeled ligands (3, 12) and (about 5 mg protein per ml) was incubated with several subclasses with different affinities for l0 mM carbamylcholine in 50 mM Tris-HCI agonists (2) or selective antagonists (8) have buffer (pH 7.5) at 30°C for 10 min, then a half been reported. It is not known, however, volume of 3 ‘X, sodium cholate in the Tris buffer whether these subclasses represent several types was added and the incubation continued for 5 of receptors which differ as chemical entities, or min at 30°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Therapeutic and Aggravating Drugs for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Tissue- Specific Pathways
    Predicting therapeutic and aggravating drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma based on tissue- specific pathways Liang Yu1*, Fengdan Xu1, Lin Gao1 1School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, PR China Associate Editor: Liang Yu *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected](LY) Abstract Motivation: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant health problem worldwide and annual number of cases are nearly more than 700,000. However,there are few safe and effective therapeutic options for HCC patients.Here, we propose a new approach for predicting therapeutic and aggravating drugs for HCCbased ontissue-specificpathways, which considersnot onlyliver tissueand functional in- formationof pathways, but also the changes of single gene in pathways. Results: Firstly, we map genes related to HCC to the liver-specific protein interaction network and get anextended tissue-specific gene set of HCC. Then, based on the extended gene set, 12 enriched KEGGfunctional pathways are extracted.Using Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic, we calculate the thera- peutic scores of drugs based on the 12 tissue-specific pathways. Finally, after filtering by Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) benchmark,we get 3 therapeutic drugs and 3 aggravating drugs for HCC. Furthermore, we validate the6potentially related drugs of HCC by analyzingtheiroverlaps with drug indications reported in PubMed literatures, and also making CMapprofile similarity analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis based on their targets. All analysis results suggest thatour approach is effective and accurate for discovering novel therapeutic options for HCC and it can be easily extended to other diseases.More importantly, our method can clearly distinguish therapeutic and aggravating drugsforHCC, which also can be used to indicateunmarked drug-disease associations in CTD as pos- itive or negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • DIFEN FLEX Eliminated During the First 12 Hours Following Administration
    4,5-dihydroxy-diclofenac) represent 10-20% of the dose eliminated in the urine. ® The elimination of diclofenac and its metabolites is rapid: 40% of the administered dose is DIFEN FLEX eliminated during the first 12 hours following administration. Diclofenac pharmacokinetics parameters remain constant after repeated administration in SODIUM DICLOFENAC INJECTABLE SOLUTION healthy subjects. Patients with hepatic dysfunction (chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis without portal PRIDINOL MESYLATE descompensation) show no pharmacokinetics changes compared to healthy subjects. Pridinol Rx Only When Pridinol is administered intravenously to dogs, only 2% of the dose is found in plasma Made in Argentina following injection, less than 9% of the dose is recovered in urine in 2 hours as unchanged pridinol and its glucuronoconjugate. No pridinol is found in urine from 2 to 7 hours after Formulation: each ampoule contains: sodium diclofenac 75.000 mg; pridinol mesylate 2.200 administration. mg. Excipients: monobasic sodium phosphate 5.160 mg; benzyl alcohol 250.000 mg; propylene After oral administration of 14C-pridinol to mice, 94% of the radioactivity leaves the digestive tract glycol 1140.000 mg; sodium metabisulfite 9.000 mg; sodium chloride 17.500 mg; sodium in 12 hours. Maximum plasma radioactivity is detected within 1 hour of administration. Between hydroxide 2.160 mg; hydrochloric acid q.s.; water for injection q.s. 3,000 ml 30 and 40% of the dose is found in bile and tissues, mainly liver and kidneys. The radioactivity is eliminated by 80% at 24 hours and by 96% in 4 days, of which 56% is urinary Therapeutic Action: Analgesic - Anti-inflammatory - Myorelaxant excreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Text (PDF)
    African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology Vol. 6(33), pp. 2477-2483, 5 September, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPP DOI: 10.5897/AJPP12.654 ISSN 1996-0816 ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper The effect of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity balance of three kinds of adjuvants on pridinol mesylate orally disintegrating tablets and its quality assessment M. Luo, P. X. Tian, Y. H. Luo*, X. Y. Zhao, Q. Chen and L. Y. Luo College of Pharmaceutical Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China. Accepted 23 August, 2012 This study was aimed at investigating the effects of 3 kinds of adjuvants on the disintegrating ability of pridinol mesylate orally disintegrating tablets (PMODT), and evaluating the quality of PMODT. The hydrophobic balance of 3 adjuvants (polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and Povidone K30 (PVPK30)) were detected using the L9(34) orthogonal test to determine their effects on the disintegrating ability of PMODT. The quality of PMODT was tested according to the requirements of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2010). Results indicated that the disintegrability of PMODT decreased with the increasing amount of PVPP from 4 to 8%. However, no significant influence on the disintegrability was found when the amount of MCC was increased from 10 to 15%. On the other hand, the disintegrability decreased with the increasing amount of MCC when the amount was 15 to 20%. Furthermore, the disintegrability was slightly affected when the amount of PVP K30 was 1 to 2%, while the disintegrability decreased when the amount of PVPK30 was at the range of 2 to 3%. The ratio of hydrophobic / hydrophilic adjuvants affected the disintegrability, which showed a “V” shape curve.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Equine Prohibited Substances List
    2021 Equine Prohibited Substances List . Prohibited Substances include any other substance with a similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s). Prohibited Substances that are identified as Specified Substances in the List below should not in any way be considered less important or less dangerous than other Prohibited Substances. Rather, they are simply substances which are more likely to have been ingested by Horses for a purpose other than the enhancement of sport performance, for example, through a contaminated food substance. LISTED AS SUBSTANCE ACTIVITY BANNED 1-androsterone Anabolic BANNED 3β-Hydroxy-5α-androstan-17-one Anabolic BANNED 4-chlorometatandienone Anabolic BANNED 5α-Androst-2-ene-17one Anabolic BANNED 5α-Androstane-3α, 17α-diol Anabolic BANNED 5α-Androstane-3α, 17β-diol Anabolic BANNED 5α-Androstane-3β, 17α-diol Anabolic BANNED 5α-Androstane-3β, 17β-diol Anabolic BANNED 5β-Androstane-3α, 17β-diol Anabolic BANNED 7α-Hydroxy-DHEA Anabolic BANNED 7β-Hydroxy-DHEA Anabolic BANNED 7-Keto-DHEA Anabolic CONTROLLED 17-Alpha-Hydroxy Progesterone Hormone FEMALES BANNED 17-Alpha-Hydroxy Progesterone Anabolic MALES BANNED 19-Norandrosterone Anabolic BANNED 19-Noretiocholanolone Anabolic BANNED 20-Hydroxyecdysone Anabolic BANNED Δ1-Testosterone Anabolic BANNED Acebutolol Beta blocker BANNED Acefylline Bronchodilator BANNED Acemetacin Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug BANNED Acenocoumarol Anticoagulant CONTROLLED Acepromazine Sedative BANNED Acetanilid Analgesic/antipyretic CONTROLLED Acetazolamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor BANNED Acetohexamide Pancreatic stimulant CONTROLLED Acetominophen (Paracetamol) Analgesic BANNED Acetophenazine Antipsychotic BANNED Acetophenetidin (Phenacetin) Analgesic BANNED Acetylmorphine Narcotic BANNED Adinazolam Anxiolytic BANNED Adiphenine Antispasmodic BANNED Adrafinil Stimulant 1 December 2020, Lausanne, Switzerland 2021 Equine Prohibited Substances List . Prohibited Substances include any other substance with a similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,071,970 Mueller Et Al
    USOO607 1970A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,071,970 Mueller et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 6, 2000 54) COMPOUNDS ACTIVE ATA NOVELSITE WOA 93 ON RECEPTOR-OPERATED CALCUM O4373 3/1993 WIPO. CHANNELS USEFUL FOR TREATMENT OF 9521612 8/1995 WIPO. NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND 9605818 2/1996 WIPO. DISEASES 964OO97 12/1996 WIPO. OTHER PUBLICATIONS 75 Inventors: Alan L. Mueller, Salt Lake City; Manuel F. Balandrin, Sandy; Marcusson, Jan O., et al., “Inhibition of Hparoxetine Bradford C. VanWagenen, Salt Lake binding by various Serotonin uptake inhibitors: Structure City; Eric G. DelMar, Salt Lake City; activity-relationships”, European Journal of Pharmacol Scott T. Moe, Salt Lake City; Linda D. ogy, 215, 1992, 191-198. Artman, Salt Lake City; Robert M. Chemical Abstracts, vol. 69, 1968, p. 3322. Barmore, Salt Lake City, all of Utah Chemical Abstracts, vol. 67, 1967, p. 3059. Chemical Abstracts, vol. 66, 1967, p. 4375. 73 Assignee: NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Salt Lake Chemical Abstracts, vol. 5, p. 423, 1959. City, Utah Williams, Ifenprodil Discriminates Subtypes of the N-meth yl-D-asparate Receptor: Selectivity and Mechanisms at 21 Appl. No.: 08/485,038 Recombinant Heteromeric Receptors, Mol. Pharmacol., 44: 851, 1993). 22 Filed: Jun. 7, 1995 Wiley and Balster, Preclinical Evaluation of N-Methyl D-aspartate Antagonists for Antianxiety Effects: a Review Related U.S. Application Data In: Multiple Sigma and PCP Receptor Ligands; Mechanisms 63 Continuation-in-part of application No. PCT/US94/12293, for Neuromodulation and Neuroprotection NPP Books, Ann Oct. 26, 1994, which is a continuation-in-part of application Arbor, Michigan pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of New Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase
    J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 219–237 219 Identification of New Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase Using a Structure-Property-Activity Relation Model Johannes Kornhuber,*,† Philipp Tripal,† Martin Reichel,† Lothar Terfloth,‡ Stefan Bleich,† Jens Wiltfang,† and Erich Gulbins£ Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, UniVersity of Erlangen, Germany, Molecular Networks, Erlangen, Germany, and Department of Molecular Biology, UniVersity of DuisburgsEssen, Germany ReceiVed May 4, 2007 Some organic weak bases induce a detachment from inner lysosomal membranes and subsequent inactivation of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) and thus work as functional ASM inhibitors. The aim of the present investigation was to develop a structure-property-activity relation (SPAR) model in order to specify the structural and physicochemical characteristics of probes capable of functionally inhibiting ASM. High pKa and high log P values are necessary but not sufficient preconditions for functional inhibition of ASM. The experimental data supported the requirement of an additional factor, which is necessary for functional inhibition of ASM. This factor k is related to the steric hindrance of the most basic nitrogen atom and presumably modulates the free presentation of a protonated nitrogen atom at the inner lysosomal surface. During the course of the study, we characterized 26 new functional ASM inhibitors, including doxepine 63, fluoxetine 104, maprotiline 109, nortriptyline 114, paroxetine 118, sertraline 124, suloctidil 125, and terfenadine 127. Introduction inactivation. Weak bases such as desipramine (17) result in a detachment of the ASM from the inner membrane21 and Eukaryotic cells have the ability to internally segregate subsequent inactivation, possibly by proteolytic degradation.22 aqueous compartments differing in pH using lipid bilayer Weak bases, therefore, do not directly inhibit ASM but result membranes and ATP-driven proton pumps.1–5 The lysosomal in a functional inhibition of ASM.
    [Show full text]