Death of Sputnik IV

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Death of Sputnik IV The Russians hurled a 5-ton spacecraft into orbit in by JAMES C. SPRY May 1960. Two weeks later they attempted reentry Public Information Office maneuvers. Something went wrong, and the way- U.S. Civil Service Commission ward satellite swung into a higher orbit. Nearly 28 months later it plunged to earth over Wisconsin. Federal scientists of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., and volunteer Moon- watch teams were waiting for it, and retrieved what before their successful Vostok flight.) The satellite, was left of the Russian prize. they said, carried a dummy cosmonaut in a pressurized cabin, and was programed for reentry maneuvers. Two The Journal presents here the story of their success- weeks later, the retrorockets were fired to slow the space- ful recovery and scientific analysis of the surviving craft for reentry. However, something went wrong. fragment. The retrorockets obviously fired in the wrong direction, for the vehicle broke into several pieces and swung into N SATURDAY, JANUARY 5, 1963, representa- a higher orbit that ended more than 2 years later on a 0 tives of the Soviet Embassy in Washington for- Manitowoc street. mally accepted from the United States the last remains of A disappointment to the Russians, yes. But the re- Sputnik IV-a 14-pound chunk of blackened metal. covery and scientific analysis of the Sputnik fragment The acceptance occurred only after a long series of ne- spelled high success to the Federal career scientists of the gotiations following the initial American offer of the Astrophysical Observatory of the Smithsonian Institu- fragment at the United Nations. tion (SAO), Cambridge, Mass., and to their volunteer Today the Sputnik fragment is undoubtedly back home Moonwatch teams scattered around the world. in Russia, where by international agreement it rightfully belongs. It might even be on display in a Moscow THE STORY BEGINS . museum-a disappointing thought to those who felt it should be turned over to one of our own museums, Many people were involved in the recovery of the either to the Smithsonian or to the museum in Mani- Sputnik IV fragment. In terms of numbers, the mem- towoc, Wis. Why Manitowoc? Because the fragment, bers of Moonwatch comprised the largest group. as part of the satellite, had whizzed through space for "Boy Scouts to bankers" has often been used to de- nearly 28 months and had crashed to earth in the middle scribe the composition of Moonwatch teams-groups of of a Manitowoc street-practically in front of the com- volunteer citizens who have proved themselves valuable munity's own museum! participants in the space age. Though they come from The Russians had hurled the 5-ton spacecraft into all walks of life and represent different age groups, they orbit on May 14, 1960, and had announced that this was all have at least three things in common: some knowledge to be a test of their life-support system. (This was of astronomy, a deep inter-est ':I.-+.-it's gting on over- @ Fnrn wlb CIVIL SERVICE JOURNAL head, and a desire to participate in space adventures. Moonwatchers, known as MW’s, are scattered around the world. Today there are 94’registered teams (60 of a satellite (or fragments) would have to survive the them in the U.S.), averaging 10 members each. Their flaming plunge through the earth’s atmosphere and activities are directed by Richard C. Vanderburgh, Chief, would have to fall on inhabited Free World land.: The Moonwatch Operations, Smithsonian Astrophysical Oh reentry would have to be observed; the point of impact servatory. calculated; and the surviving fragments located. This The MW’s put themselves on the map at the very would surely happen, the SA0 scientists reasoned, sooner beginning of the space age. Already organized and or later-probably within 1 to 10 years. Undaunted by partially trained to help make visual observations during such poor odds, they knew that a successful recovery (and after) the International Geophysical Year, they would have great scientific value in the fields of radia- were ready to respond when Russia caught the free worlJ tion and meteoritic studies, especially since the amount off-guard with the launching of Sputnik I on October 4, of time the fragment had spent in space would be known 19S7. Our tracking stations were not yet fully opera- precisely. tional, so the MW’s headed for the fields and rooftops The U.S. had previously recovered some fragments and provided our first direct information on the orbit from space, mostly pieces of rocket casings that had and other characteristics of the satellite. been up for only a few orbits, but we had never recov- During the years since Sputnik I, the Moonwatchers ered any satellite fragment that had been exposed to the have performed a variety of useful services. However, space environment for any length of time. It was this the growing sophistication of our electronic and camera latter condition that interested the SA0 people. tracking systems threatened to put them out of business. Dr. Fred L. Whipple, Director of SAO, had other ideas. A TRIAL RUN At the third annual MW Teamleaders Conference at As an experiment, the Moonwatch Division made SA0 in May 1962, Dr. Whipple gave renewed emphasis plans to conduct an organized skypatrol in an attempt to visual observations of reentering satellites as an MW to observe the next large reentering satellite-which project. Up to that time, the SAO-Moonwatch effort5 happened to be Sputnik IV. The U.S. Space Detection to recover satellite fragments, supported in part by a and Tracking Center (SPADATS) had predicted reentry NASA grant, had been unsuccessful. Dr. Whipple sug- of this satellite to occur on or about September 6, 1962. gested an intensified effort, pointing out that with morc Exact time and place of reentry: unknown. and more satellites going up, and more and more coming Using their own approach to the problem. plus basic . down, the chances for success were getting better. He information provided by SPADATS, the Moonwatch felt that MW observers would have a better chance for Division outlined for the IBM-7090 computer a basic success than the Baker-Nunn camera stations, since sky- program that would produce detailed information as to patrols can continuously cover the entire sky. This point when a given observation station would pass beneath was strengthened by the fact that the final orbits of re- entering satellites change very rapidly, making it difficult to know where and when to point the large cameras. An all-out planned satellite recovery project seemed REENTHY FACTS a natural enterprise for SA0 to undertake, with their As an orbiting satellite begins to lose its worldwide network of MW’s, camera stations, and coin- energy, each successive orbit brings it closer and munications systems. Also, they had been engaged in closer to earth. As this ha pens, atmospheric recovery of meteorite fragments and had an excellent resistance removes more an8more energy dur- laboratory that was doing radioisotope analyses of the ing each orbit. Ultimately it will reach a point fragments. where its velocity cannot offset the pull of Dr. Whipple’s suggestion was adopted, but the MW’s earth’s gravity, and reentry begins. and SA0 scientists who would work hand-in-hand on Reentering at a speed of around 5 miles-per- the project knew full well that the chances for early second, the body begins to experience sufficient success were slim indeed. air friction about 60 miles up to cause it to heat up and glow-and thus to be visible from the . WITH A STACKED DECK ground. The final, uncontrolled plunge to What were the chances for recovering a satellite earth creates destructive temperatures that can fragment? Better than ever before, but not good enough vaporize the hardest steel. The distance from to warrant hopes for an early recovery. the first glow-point to the point where surviving Four-fifths of the earths surface is water. Of the fragments (if any) strike the ground can be one-fifth that is land, a large proportion is behind the several thousand miles. Iron Curtain. Then, too, a large part of Free World c3uunlwd on paga 10 CIVIL SERVICE JOURNAL EhDmPw 17 the satellite’s orbit during its final revolutions. From Within minutes the Milwaukee Joi/riml and local radio the computer output, a table showing such information and TV stations swung into action, informing the public \ (called a “prediction ephemeris”) was carefully prepared. that pieces of the sat&ite might be down that ared. On August 29, 1962, MW headquarters airmailed Residents finding suspicious pieces of metal were asked instruction packets to about 750 addresses, including to rush them to the Journnl. Needless to say, a strange those of MW teams, phototrack members, observatories, assortment of just plain junk was collected. colleges, universities, and other interested groups throughout the world. MW had decided to scan the DISCOVERY IN MANITOWOC skies around the clock on September 5, 6, and 7-0r Seventy-five miles north of Milwaukee, the Lake until it was known that Sputnik IV was down. Michigan port city of Manitowoc was beginning to stir The prediction ephemeris was sent to all MW teams in the early morning. Unaware of what had been seen with instructions to set up shifts to monitor each pass in other sections of Wisconsin, patrolmen Ronald Rus- of the satellite over their stations. A covering letter boldt and Marvin Bausch were cruising the streets II, said, in part: “Our main purpose will be to try out their squad car. At 5:30 a.m. they noticed in the mid- techniques and procedures for determination of the re- dle of the street a small object resembling an irregularly gion of impact by the pieces of the satellite which sur- shaped piece of cardboard.
Recommended publications
  • Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships!
    Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships! Sputnik, Vostok, Voskhod, and Soyuz Launcher Schematics Uttering the text “rocket ship” can excite, mystify, and inspire young children. A rocket ship can transport people and cargo to places far away with awe-inspiring speed and accuracy. The text “rocket scientist” indexes a highly intelligent and admirable person, someone who is able to create, or assist in the creation of machines, vehicles that can actually leave the world we all call “home.” Rocket scientists possess the knowledge to take human beings and fantastic machines to space. This knowledge is built upon basic scientific principles of motion and form—the understanding, for young learners, of shapes and their function. This lesson uses the shape of a rocket to ignite engineering knowledge and hopefully, inspiration in young pupils and introduces them to a space program on the other side of the world. Did you know that the first person in space, Yuri Gagarin, was from the former Soviet Union? That the Soviet Union (now Russia) sent the first spacecraft, Sputnik I, into Earth’s orbit? That today, American NASA-based astronauts fly to Russia to launch and must learn conversational Russian as part of their training? Now, in 2020, there are Russians and Americans working together in the International Space Station (ISS), the latest brought there by an American-based commercial craft. Being familiar with the contributions Russia (and the former Soviet Union) has made to space travel is an integral part of understanding the ongoing human endeavor to explore the space all around us. After all, Russian cosmonauts use rocket ships too! The following lesson plan is intended for kindergarten students in Indiana to fulfill state engineering learning requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Space Program
    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Type Your Paper Title Here In
    Estimating the Reliability of a Soyuz Spacecraft Mission Michael G. Lutomskia*, Steven J. Farnham IIb, and Warren C. Grantb aNASA-JSC, Houston, TX – [email protected] bARES Corporation, Houston, TX Abstract: Once the US Space Shuttle retires in 2010, the Russian Soyuz Launcher and Soyuz Spacecraft will comprise the only means for crew transportation to and from the International Space Station (ISS). The U.S. Government and NASA have contracted for crew transportation services to the ISS with Russia. The resulting implications for the US space program including issues such as astronaut safety must be carefully considered. Are the astronauts and cosmonauts safer on the Soyuz than the Space Shuttle system? Is the Soyuz launch system more robust than the Space Shuttle? Is it safer to continue to fly the 30 year old Shuttle fleet for crew transportation and cargo resupply than the Soyuz? Should we extend the life of the Shuttle Program? How does the development of the Orion/Ares crew transportation system affect these decisions? The Soyuz launcher has been in operation for over 40 years. There have been only two loss of life incidents and two loss of mission incidents. Given that the most recent incident took place in 1983, how do we determine current reliability of the system? Do failures of unmanned Soyuz rockets impact the reliability of the currently operational man-rated launcher? Does the Soyuz exhibit characteristics that demonstrate reliability growth and how would that be reflected in future estimates of success? NASA’s next manned rocket and spacecraft development project is currently underway.
    [Show full text]
  • SOYUZ THROUGH the AGES the R-7 Rocket That Led to the Family of Soyuz Vehicles Launching Today Lifted Off for the First Time Onfeb
    RUSSIAN SPACE SOYUZ THROUGH THE AGES The R-7 rocket that led to the family of Soyuz vehicles launching today lifted off for the first time onFeb. 17, 1959. The last launch, on Dec. 27, 2018, was number 1,898. Irene Klotz and Maxim Pyadushkin Vostochny Cosmodrome anufactured by the Progress Rocket Space Center in Sama- Evolution of Soyuz-Family Launch Vehicles ra, Russia, the medium-lift expendable booster originally was used for Soviet-era human space missions and later became the R-7 Soyuz Soyuz-L workhorse for the country’s civilian and military space programs. M 1957 First launch of the ICBM (SS-6 1966-76 (32 launches, 1970-71 (three launches, Sapwood) that served as a basis for including 30 successful, all successful, The first rocket officially named Soyuz was launched in Soviet/Russian launch vehicles from Baikonur) from Baikonur) 1966 and has since flown 1,050 times, of which 1,023 were including the Soyuz family successful. Production of Soyuz rockets peaked in the early Soyuz 1980s at about 60 vehicles per year. Medium-Class Launch Vehicle Russia began offering Soyuz launch services internationally in the mid-1980s through Glavkosmos, a commercial entity set up to sell Soviet rocket and space technologies. Manufacturer: Progress Rocket Space Soyuz-U/-U2 Soyuz-M Center, Samara, Russia In 1996, Russia created Starsem, a joint venture (35% ArianeGroup, 25% Roscosmos, 25% RKTs Progress, 15% 1991 Breakup of the 1973-2017 1971-76 (eight launches, Soviet Union, (859 launches, including all successful, from Plesetsk) Dimensions Arianespace) that had exclusive rights to provide commercial launch services on Soyuz launch vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Vostok Spacecraft Retrofire and Deorbit Systems, December 1963
    DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL, E.O. 13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP APPEAL NO. 2009-068, document no. 9 DECLASSIFICATION DATE: November 13,2014 )81 VOSTOK SPACECRAFT RETROFIRE AND DEORBff SYSTEMS DECEMBER \963 - TASK 61820 4{3.3.8.3) AiR FO~C~ ~~~S~l~ DEVilOPiiOOT C!NT~~~ ~O~WMA~ AI~ ~0~~~ ~A$f ~H11 ~~ElC@ A:-'rJIOC 63- 6292. 1nh.') ~ · n ..~ ~·.c . :1 , · ,J r. i~ . : 1 . ng w :~ r . v r P• r • Ol.:nlly aJJe :. t .: ~ ih~( (011 · -.U:1 t' ci ; n ;·, ·, ~: : b! c ;; : c .--~ , ·.Lr:.:ld b < fcnvarchd b )• the reClp : f· a1t d . r (· r • L· , ,-. AFMD C: :MDr!::l. i-i<:-·: k-m ·\ n .-\FB. :-.l ~ w !.,ic-x:co 63330 T h: ::- .n :-:'.• v..·.":.t'.f :t b b!" ,:· g.i :.~ ~- o r .:a. l:tr.s resp0n~;b.Lty j u r !>end i ng c- '..1 : i". r: .!\: · rr.~·_ _,_,-;_ (..r ariy P f· :- \ i :\ent tnlell-.gt::nc:C; dc.\.a. tY.rc-ugh -:;. i:- : .:-~ d ·~· t ~- ~l.'cl =.-t. t-d -.: :~ f:}l · g e ;-, rt= (-:l't..:cnon chan n c Is ·J f the 1.:-'. 0 ',b ~-·t-' ; · c€~ < - ~ ~gcn.:-~r~ :; ,: f : }·. .:: \j S· G c ·.. ;e r r.m e n~ 2 \V AR~~ : :·JG T i;_ ·, ::, d o c..L rn e n: r.c.·r. ! 1an~ :. rdo rma Lon affec • ! n g the -: =t1 · c.:-d .l deff-n. :; c c..£ 1(. c· C S. w~r:h · .n t.'ne rnean~ng o i the E:sp1onage J.• <w.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceflight Mission Report: Voskhod 2
    Spaceflight mission report: Voskhod 2 Human Spaceflights International Flight No. 12 Voskhod 2 Almaz USSR hi res version (188 KB) Launch, orbit and landing data Launch date: 18.03.1965 Launch time: 07:00 UTC Launch site: Baikonur Launch pad: 1 Altitude: 173 - 498 km Inclination: 64.79° Landing date: 19.03.1965 Landing time: 09:02 UTC Landing site: 59° 34' 03'' N, 55° 28' 00" E walkout photo hi res version (290 KB) alternate crew photo alternate crew photo alternate crew photo Crew No. Surname Given names Position Flight No. Duration Orbits 1 Belyayev Pavel Ivanovich Commander 1 1d 02h 02m 18 http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/english/voskhod-2.htm[4/15/2015 9:59:47 AM] Spaceflight mission report: Voskhod 2 2 Leonov Aleksei Arkhipovich Second Pilot 1 1d 02h 02m 18 Crew seating arrangement Launch Landing 1 Belyayev 1 Belyayev 2 Leonov 2 Leonov 1st Backup Crew No. Surname Given names Position 1 Zaikin Dmitri Alekseyevich Commander 2 Khrunov Yevgeni Vasiliyevich Second Pilot 2nd Backup Crew No. Surname Given names Position 1 Gorbatko Viktor Vasiliyevich Commander 2 Kolodin Pyotr Ivanovich Second Pilot Flight Launch from the Baikonur Cosmodrome; landing in the Ural-Mountains (180 km northeast of Perm, west of Berezniki). The Voskhod 2 spacecraft was a Vostok spacecraft with a backup, solid fuel retrorocket, attached atop the descent module. The ejection seat was removed and two seats were added, (at a 90-degree angle relative to the Vostok crew seats position). An inflatable exterior airlock was also added to the descent module opposite the entry hatch.
    [Show full text]
  • A Race to the Stars and Beyond: How the Soviet Union's Success in The
    Volume 18 Article 5 May 2019 A Race to the Stars and Beyond: How the Soviet Union’s Success in the Space Race Helped Serve as a Projection of Communist Power Jack H. Lashendock Gettysburg College Class of 2020 Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj Part of the History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Lashendock, Jack H. (2019) "A Race to the Stars and Beyond: How the Soviet Union’s Success in the Space Race Helped Serve as a Projection of Communist Power," The Gettysburg Historical Journal: Vol. 18 , Article 5. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol18/iss1/5 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Race to the Stars and Beyond: How the Soviet Union’s Success in the Space Race Helped Serve as a Projection of Communist Power Abstract In the modern era, the notion of space travel is generally one of greater acceptance and ease than in times previously. Moreover, a greater number of nations (and now even private entities) have the technological capabilities to launch manned and unmanned missions into Earth’s Orbit and beyond. 70 years ago, this ability did not exist and humanity was simply an imprisoned species on this planet. The ourc se of humanity’s then- present and the collective future was forever altered when, in 1957, the Soviet Union successfully launched the world’s first satellite into space, setting off a decades-long completion with the United States to cosmically outperform the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impact of US Air Force National Security Space Launch Acquisition Decisions
    C O R P O R A T I O N BONNIE L. TRIEZENBERG, COLBY PEYTON STEINER, GRANT JOHNSON, JONATHAN CHAM, EDER SOUSA, MOON KIM, MARY KATE ADGIE Assessing the Impact of U.S. Air Force National Security Space Launch Acquisition Decisions An Independent Analysis of the Global Heavy Lift Launch Market For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4251 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0399-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Courtesy photo by United Launch Alliance. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Warning Automated System of Hazardous
    FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY Federal State Unitary Enterprise Central Research Institute for Machine Building Mission Control Center DetectionDetection andand WarningWarning AutomatedAutomated SystemSystem ofof HazardousHazardous SituationsSituations InIn nearnear --EarthEarth SpaceSpace (NES).(NES). StateState andand PerspectivePerspective ofof Development.Development. 2011 INFORMATION INTERACTION DIAGRAM Foreign Emergency Ministry Ministry Ministry of Defense ROSCOSMOS Russian Academy of Sciences Headquarters Central Administration Presidium ASPOS Remote Terminal Space Board Military Units Institutes IPM, IZMIRAN RF SKKP TsNIImash MCC CKKP Observatory MAK Central Nucleus «Vimpel» Rocket and Space Technology Developers Enterprise, Means Means of Tracking of other Institutes of Tracking Scientific organizations RF and CIS Agencies and society Profiling internet sites Profiling Publication Other Space Agencies and Organization NASA IADC ESA 1 NES ASPOS MAIN TASKS Earth Space Global Monitoring of Technogenic Environment Identification, Forecasting, Issuing Warnings about the Dangerous Approach of a Controlled Spacecraft and Space Debris Forecasting of Entry into the Atmosphere and Fall to Earth of Uncontrolled Risk Objects Providing of Roskosmos with Information and Analytical Data regarding the Technogenic Environment in NES and RF Participation in International Activities of Space Debris Problems 2 NES ASPOS APPLICATION RESULTS (2009 - 2011) Were Identified more than 200 Dangerous Approaches of ISS with Space Debris. In 9 Cases Were Identified Violation of the Security Zone Station. Were Performed 3 Escape Maneuver. Were Identified more than 500 Space Debris Approaches with the Russian Spacecrafts “Resurs-DK”, “Koronas- Foton”, “Sterh”, GLONASS Spacecrafts and Geostationary Orbit Spacecrafts. Was Completed Operational Ballistic and Information Support of De-orbit more than 100 Space Objects Including Time and Fall Area Determination. Was Provided RF Participation in 2 International Test Campaigns to Support “Falling" Space Objects De-orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Influence of Various Factors on Final Re-Entry Prediction of Uncontrollable Space Objects Descending from Orbits T.I
    ESTIMATION OF INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS FACTORS ON FINAL RE-ENTRY PREDICTION OF UNCONTROLLABLE SPACE OBJECTS DESCENDING FROM ORBITS T.I. Afanasieva, N.A. Golubtsova, T.A. Gridchina, Yu.F. Kolyuka 0LVVLRQ&RQWURO&HQWHU3LRQHUVND\DVWU.RUROHY0RVFRZ5HJLRQ5XVVLD (PDLO\IN#PFFUVDUX ABSTRACT risk space objects we consider the space vehicles equipped with the radioactive power sources or have on This paper deals with a problem of searching for ways board other hazardous substances, as well as large and which can increase an accuracy of the final results of re- heavy man-made space objects with the high-melting entry prediction of space objects (SO), descending from units onboard which fragments, having a large kinetic their orbits in uncontrollable mode, and, in particular, energy, can impact the Earth’ surface. In these cases an estimation of influence of different factors on reaching the highest possible accuracy of a SO’ re-entry accuracy of such predictions. On examples of the prediction is actual, both from the point of view of the solution of the re-entry prediction problem for the 7th well-timed warning of an approach of possible various space objects on the basis of processing of these hazardous situations in certain territories and from the SO’ measurements fulfilled during 1-1.5 days before point of view of conformation or disclaimer of the facts their re-entries and realization of a considerable of such SO’ fragments falling on one or another area of quantity of variants of the orbit determination and re- the Earth’ surface. entry prediction tasks at different initial data for these objects, including the use of different models of However for today practically reached accuracy of an atmosphere, some results were obtained and certain uncontrollable SO re-entry time prediction in the most conclusions were made, which can be used for selection cases remains enough low.
    [Show full text]
  • Energiya BURAN the Soviet Space Shuttle.Pdf
    Energiya±Buran The Soviet Space Shuttle Bart Hendrickx and Bert Vis Energiya±Buran The Soviet Space Shuttle Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK Mr Bart Hendrickx Mr Bert Vis Russian Space Historian Space¯ight Historian Mortsel Den Haag Belgium The Netherlands SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, M.Sc., B.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN978-0-387-69848-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg NewYork Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2007929116 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services Ltd, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Ooedhpjmbhe ........................................ xiii Foreword (translation of Ooedhpjmbhe)........................ xv Authors' preface ....................................... xvii Acknowledgments ...................................... xix List of ®gures ........................................ xxi 1 The roots of Buran .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet/ Russian Human Space Program
    Space Studies 590 Colloquium Soviet/Russian Human Space Flight Program Vadim Rygalov Pablo de León The Department of Space Studies University of North Dakota February 26, 2007 Manned Space Flight Program in Soviet Union & Russia Theoretical Developments for Space Research by Rocket Vehicles Rocketry: Science & Engineering Solar Planetary System Probes Manned Space Flight Health Care Programs Long-Term Life Support in Space Origins of Manned Space Flights in Russia Origins of Manned Space Vehicles in Soviet Russia K.E. Tsiolkovski S. P. Korolev The Rocket Equation Origins of Manned Space Vehicles in Soviet Russia: GIRD Soviet Sounding Rockets First Manned System First Soviet plans to send a man to space started in 1948. Plans were to launch a cosmonaut on board a modified R-5 (SS-3). M.K. Tikhonravov was in charge of the design. 1955 Concepts Five concepts for suborbital flight designed in 1955. Sowjetischer Raketen by P. Stache Sputnik I and II Animals in Space Laika in Sputnik II Belka and Strelka 7 – ‘Semyorka’ Rockets Vostok and Konstantin Feoktistov Courtesy: Smithsonian Air and Space Museum Vostok First Design (1958) OD-2 Spacecraft From: Materialy po istorii kosmischeskogo korablyam “Vostok”. B. Raushenbaj, Moscow,1991. Vostok (East) Drawing courtesy of Dave Woods Vostok Flight Profile Drawing courtesy of Ralph Gibbons Vostok Spacecraft Drawing courtesy of Dave Woods Courtesy of Tsiolkovski Museum in Kaluga Vostok Ejection Seat Museum of Economic Achievements of the USSR www.astronautix.com Ivan Ivanovich as a prelude to
    [Show full text]