DOCSLIB.ORG

Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide CJOS COE Version 2.0 April 2020 The Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE) was established in 2006 to provide a focal point for Joint Maritime Expeditionary Operations expertise for Allied nations. With 13 nations represented, CJOS COE is the only Centre of Excellence in the United States and is one of 25 accredited Centers worldwide, representing a collective wealth of international experience and expertise. 2 Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide A Guide to Enhance Interoperability Among Allied, Coalition and NATO Navies Version 2.0 April 2020 3 Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide Table of Contents Preface Change Record Disclaimer Introduction 1.0 Introduction…….………………………………………………………..………………..12 2.0 Background……………………………………….………………………..…………….12 3.0 Purpose, Objectives and Goals……………………….…………………..…………...13 4.0 Guide Organization…….………….……………………….……………………………14 5.0 Ordering and Distribution….……….……………………………………….…………..15 6.0 Review and Revision……………..……………………………………….…………….15 PART ONE: COALITION ELEMENT INTEGRATION INTO U.S. NAVY EXERCISES 1.0 Participating Agencies - Roles and Responsibilities………..……………….………17 1.1. Commander U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFF)……….………….……..17 1.2. U.S. 2nd Fleet….………………………………………………………………...17 1.3. Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFC NF)………….…………….……………18 1.4. Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence…….….…18 1.5. Commander Carrier Strike Group FOUR (CSG-4)………….…….…….…..18 1.6. Tactical Training Group Atlantic (TTGL)………………….…….………..…..19 1.7. Expeditionary Warfare Training Group Atlantic (EWTGL)…….….………..19 1.8. The Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facility (SESEF)…....……20 1.9. Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility, Virginia Capes….….……….21 2.0 Cooperative Deployment Program………………………………………….……….22 3.0 Coalition Participation Process - Exercise Integration.………………………...….23 3.1 General………………….………………,,,………………………….……………23 4 3.2 Determining the Right Training Event for Deploying Forces……..….………..24 3.3 Identification of Participating Maritime Forces…………….…………..……….24 3.4 Coordinating Authorities…………………….……………………..……………..24 3.5 Defining Training Objectives………….….………………..……………………..25 3.6 Planning Process…………………....………………..………………………….25 4.0 Bi- or Multi-lateral Agreements……..……...………..………………………………. 26 5.0 COMSEC Bilateral Agreements…...……….…………………………………………29 6.0 Foreign Disclosure Policy……………….…...………………………………………..29 7.0 Financial Issues…………………….…………………………………………………..30 8.0 Conference Participation…………….…………………………………….…………..31 8.1 Training Events - Scheduling Conference……………………………...……….31 9.0 Optimized Fleet Response Training Plan…………………………………….………34 9.1 Warfare Commander’s Conference…………...………………………..…….…34 9.2 Fleet Synthetic Training (FST)…………………………………………….……..35 9.3 Group Sail…………………...…………………………………………………..…36 9.4 Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX or C2X)………………….....36 ANNEX A: USFFC TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION ANNEX B: CSG/ESG COMPOSITION ANNEX C: OPTIMIZED FLEET RESPONSE TRAINING PLAN (OFRTP) ANNEX D: PRE-DEPLOYMENT CHECKLIST ANNEX E: EARLY LIAISON CHECKLIST ANNEX F: LNO/COORDO DAILY ON BOARD ROUTINE (EXAMPLE) 1. PART TWO: COALITION ELEMENT INTEROPERABILITY 1.0 Operation……….….……………………………………………………………….……47 1.1 "Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures" (TTPs)…….…….…..….………….…47 1.2 NATO versus US Publications……….…….……………………..………….….48 5 1.2.1 Operational Orders and Standard Reports……………………………….49 1.3 Command and Control.…………………..…….…………………...………….…51 1.4 Warfare Commander Concept……..…………………………...……………..…52 1.5 Air and Missile Defense……………….…...…………………...…….…….…….52 1.6 Sea Combat Commander (SCC)………….…………..………………..………..55 1.6.1 Anti-Submarine Warfare………..…………………………………...….…56 1.6.2 Anti-Surface Warfare…….…………………………….…………………. 57 1.6.3 Information Warfare/Electronic Warfare………….………….…………..57 1.6.4 Force Protection…...……………………………………………………….59 1.7 Carrier Operation…………………..….………………………………..…………59 1.7.1 Air Operations………..…………...………….……………………………60 1.7.2 Helicopter Operations………...………....….…...……….……..…………61 1.8 Amphibious - USMC Specifics………………..……….…….………….………62 1.9 Conditions and Definitions………………..………….………………………….62 1.9.1 Defensive Conditions (DEFCONS)……..…………..………….…..……61 1.9.2 Force Protection Conditions (FPCON)................................................63 1.9.3 Emission Control Status (EMCON)…………………….………….….…63 1.9.4 Information Conditions (INFOCON).....................................................64 1.9.5 RIVER CITY – Conditions....................................................................64 1.9.6 Tactical Situation (TACSIT) – Definitions………….……………………65 1.9.7 U.S. Weapon Postures (WP)…………………………….……….………65 1.9.8 U.S. Readiness Conditions……………………………....……………….66 1.9.9 Material Conditions of Readiness…………………….……...…………..67 2.0 Information Sharing………………………………………………………………………67 2.1 Command and Control Systems – C2……….………..…….……..….………68 6 2.2 Communication……..……… .……....………………………………..…………69 2.2.1 HAVE QUICK II…………...………………………………………..………71 2.3 Intelligence ……...……...…….………..……...…………………………………72 2.4 DATA LINK….…...…….……..…….…………………………….……………...73 ANNEX G: COMMUNICATIONS GUIDE ANNEX H: INTEROPERABILITY CHECKLIST ANNEX I: NATO VS US PUBLICATION TABLE ANNEX J: COALITION IFF REQUIREMENTS Interrogator Information Form Transponder Information Form ACP 190 Annex H Spreadsheet Form PART THREE: COALITION INTEGRATION LOGISTICS 1.0 Agreements………………………………………………………..……………………..105 2.0 Services………………………………………………………..…………………………106 2.1 Refueling/Oil………………………….…….…………………………………..106 2.2 Maintenance…………………………..……….……………………………….107 2.3 Pier – Side Service……………………………………………………………..108 a. Flight Operations…………………………………………….……………109 b. Diving Operations…………………………………………….…………..110 c. Small Boat Operations…….…………………………………..…………110 3.0 Morale Welfare and Recreation (MWR)……..………..……………………..………..110 4.0 Security………..……………………………………………………………….…………111 5.0 Medical…………………..…………………………………………………….…………113 PART FOUR: COALITION ELEMENT “BEST PRACTICE” LEXICON - ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 7 PREFACE A brief scan of recent developments in NATO thinking can leave nobody in any doubt as to the centrality of collective capability. In the maritime domain, we have reached an inflection point where an increased emphasis on interoperability and integration is only going to continue to grow. The return to a focus on peer adversary warfare demands the highest practicable levels of capability, leveraging allies’ relative strengths and achieving and sustaining genuine collective readiness for operations. Optimizing the Alliance’s combined and joint interoperability is both vital and urgent. Operating as a coalition is invariably more challenging than acting as a national force, and this is exacerbated by the complexity of joint operations across domains. The ad hoc manner in which nations come together to operate makes the need for standardization very important, but adapting doctrine, policy or operating procedures takes commitment, effort and investment. Tackling these issues as far upstream as practicable will yield the best results and deliver the most efficient solutions. We are not however starting from scratch, and must find the most effective way to accomplish the mission. Careful planning, robust training and a conscious effort to combine forces wherever possible is necessary in order to fight and win as an alliance. In order to support this effort, Naval Interoperability is one of the core tasks of the Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE) Programme of Work (POW). This updated Allied Interoperability & Integration Guide is a key element of that work. The change in title for this edition reflects the fact that progress is being made; whilst there is still much work to do in ensuring basic interoperability, there is increasing discussion of the need for greater integration amongst allies and partners, and this guide aims to take us ever closer to that. T J Guy Commodore Royal Navy Acting Director Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence 8 Change Record Date/Version Chapter/Part/Page Description Remarks NOV 2019/2.0 Title Integration Change Coordination to Integration NOV 2019/2.0 ONE/1.0/12 Introduction Guide update from annually to every two years MAR 2019/2.0 ONE/1.2/17 Update As U.S. 2nd Fleet U.S. Second Fleet develops frequent updates on tasks and interconnections to the Carrier Deployment Program might be necessary. NOV 2019/2.0 ONE/1.3/18 New New entity which liaises Joint Force with allies, coalitions and Command Norfolk partners (JFC NF) MAR 2019/2.0 ONE/3.3/24 Update Update on essential IFF and Information information requirements. requirements for ONE, Participating ANNEX D /41 Maritime Forces Pre-deployment Checklist NOV 2019/2.0 ONE/3.6/25 Planning Process LNO/POC engagement six month prior, conference update and LL/LI Conference MAR 2019/2.0 One/4.0/26 Update Update on required Bi-lateral or Multi- timeline and Information lateral Agreements NOV 2020/2.0 Foreign Cooperation Officer Additional inputs to MOU NOV 2019/2.0 TWO/1.1/47 Tactics, Missing Joining Package Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) NOV 2019/2.0 TWO,1.2, 48 NATO versus US Update Publications 9 NOV 2019/2.0 TWO,1.3, 51 Command and INCHOP/OUTCHOP Control MAR 2019/2.0 TWO/1.5/52 Rectification Terminology Air and Missile Defense MAR 2019/2.0 TWO, New NATO vs U.S. Publication ANNEX I/ 94 NATO vs U.S. equivalent Publication Table Interoperability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2011 A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Koda, Yoji (2011) "A New Carrier Race?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Koda: A New Carrier Race? A NEW CARRIER RACE? Strategy, Force Planning, and JS Hyuga Vice Admiral Yoji Koda, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Retired) n 18 March 2009 JS Hyuga (DDH 181) was commissioned and delivered to Othe Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF). The unique characteris- tic of this ship is its aircraft-carrier-like design, with a “through” flight deck and an island on the starboard side. Hyuga was planned in the five-year Midterm De- fense Buildup Plan (MTDBP) of 2001 and funded in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2004 as the replacement for the aging first-generation helicopter-carrying de- stroyer (DDH), JS Haruna (DDH 141), which was to reach the end of its service life of thirty-five years in 2009. The second ship of the new class, JS Ise (DDH 182), of the JFY 2006 program, was commissioned 16 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Flotilla Admiral Georgi Penev Deputy Commander of The
    FLOTILLA ADMIRAL GEORGI PENEV DEPUTY COMMANDER OF THE BULGARIAN NAVY Flotilla Admiral Georgi Penev Penev, Bulgarian Navy is a native of Provadia, Bulgaria, and was born on 19 August 1969. In 1989, he graduated from the Secondary Polytechnic School in Provadia, Bulgaria. Flotilla Admiral Penev graduated the Bulgarian Naval Academy in Varna where he got a Master Degree of Science in Navigation (1994). He was commissioned as Navigation Officer from the Bulgarian Naval Academy on August 1994. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Anti-submarine Warfare Officer onboard of KONI class frigate BGS SMELI in Varna Naval Base. His next seagoing assignment was Executive Officer of the KONI class frigate BGS SMELI from 1997 to 2003. In 2003, Flotilla Admiral Penev was selected to attend the Rakovski National Defence Academy in Sofia, and graduated in 2005. After his graduation, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Commanding Officer of the KONI class frigate BGS SMELI from 2005 to 2007. His next appointment was as Chief of Staff of the First Patrol Frigate and Corvettes Squadron in Varna Naval Base from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Squadron Commander of the First Patrol Frigate and Corvettes Squadron in Varna Naval Base. In 2013, Flotilla Admiral Penev reported as a student to the Rakovski National Defence College in Sofia and graduated in 2014. In 2014, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Chief of Staff in Bulgarian Naval Base, and in 2016 he received an assignment in the Bulgarian Navy Headquarters as Chief of Staff. In 2018 he assumed his current position as a Deputy Commander of the Bulgarian Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships – 2019 Annual Report
    ICC IMB Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships – 2019 Annual Report p ICC INTERNATIONAL MARITIME BUREAU PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 1 January – 31 December 2019 WARNING The information contained in this document is for the internal use of the recipient only. Unauthorised distribution of this document, and/or publication (including publication on a Web site) by any means whatsoever is an infringement of the Bureau’s copyright. ICC International Maritime Bureau Cinnabar Wharf 26 Wapping High Street London E1W 1NG United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 423 6960 Fax: +44 207 423 6961 Email: [email protected] Web: www.icc-ccs.org January 2020 1 ICC IMB Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships – 2019 Annual Report INTRODUCTION The ICC International Maritime Bureau (IMB) is a specialised division of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). The IMB is a not-for-profit organisation, established in 1981 to act as a focal point in the fight against all types of maritime crime and malpractice. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in its resolution A 504 (XII) (5) and (9) adopted on 20 November 1981, has inter alia, urged governments, stakeholders and organisation to co-operate and exchange information with each other, and the IMB, with a view of maintaining and developing a coordinated action in combating maritime fraud. This report is an analysis of world-wide reported incidents of piracy and armed robbery against ships from 1 January to 31 December 2019. Outrage in the shipping industry at the alarming growth in piracy prompted the creation of the IMB Piracy Reporting Centre (PRC) in October 1992 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander Commodore José António Mirones Spanish Navy Commander of Standing Nato Maritime Group Two (Snmg1)
    COMMANDER COMMODORE JOSÉ ANTÓNIO MIRONES SPANISH NAVY COMMANDER OF STANDING NATO MARITIME GROUP TWO (SNMG1) José António Mirones was born in 1965 and joined the Portuguese Navy Naval Academy in 1983, graduating with the class of 88. After Fleet training, including involvement in disaster relief in the North Sea, in the aftermath of Piper Alfa oil rig disaster, and exchange with the United States Navy, in USS Joseph Hewes, his early years were spent at sea as a bridge watch-keeper, carrying out fishery protection and maritime securityoperations. Principal Warfare Officer in several frigates, was also Head of Department (Operations) and Executive officer with operational deployments to the Adriatic, supporting EU and NATO embargo operations; Mediterranean, namely Operation Enduring Freedom, in the wake of September 11th; Baltic; Artic Ocean and wider Atlantic. He completed the specialist ASW´s course in 1999. Took command of the frigate Bartolomeu Dias, in January 2009, as her first Commanding Officer. Promoted to Captain, acted as CTG (EUROMARFOR TG) for two occasions and, more recently, as Commodore, was the force commander for the EU naval operation ATALANTA, in the Indian Ocean. His staff appointments have included two tours at the Naval Staff (Plans and Policy and External Affairs Division). His last shore assignment was as Military Assistant to the Chief of the Defence Staff. José António Mirones personal decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Cross as well as various campaign ribbons and foreign medals. @NATOMaritimeCommand @NATO_MARCOM @NATO HQ MARCOM Allied Maritime Command I Public Affairs OfficeI [email protected] I www.mc.nato.int.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Greek Trireme: a Staple of Ancient Maritime Tradition
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Classics Ancient Science Fair Religion, Philosophy, and Classics 2020 The Ancient Greek Trireme: A staple of Ancient Maritime Tradition Joseph York Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ancient_science_fair Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Military History Commons Repository Citation York , J. (2020). The Ancient Greek Trireme: A staple of Ancient Maritime Tradition. Dayton, Ohio. This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion, Philosophy, and Classics at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Ancient Science Fair by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Origin of the Trireme: The Ancient Greek Trireme: A staple of Ancient Maritime Tradition The Trireme likely evolved out of the earlier Greek ships such as the earlier two decked biremes often depicted in a number of Greek pieces of pottery, according to John Warry. These ships depicted in Greek pottery2 were sometimes show with or without History of the Trireme: parexeiresia, or outriggers. The invention of the Trireme is attributed The Ancient Greek Trireme was a to the Sidonians according to Clement staple ship of Greek naval warfare, of Alexandria in the Stromata. and played a key role in the Persian However, Thucydides claims that the Wars, the creation of the Athenian Trireme was invented by the maritime empire, and the Corinthians in the late 8th century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Flotilla Commander Change of Administration Guide
    Flotilla Commander Change of Administration Guide This instruction contains recommendations for obtaining a smooth transition period for newly elected Flotilla Commanders. It is the intent of this instruction to suggest a schedule of activities that will help maximize the efficiency of these administrative transition periods. The Change of Watch ceremony is the symbolic representation of this change of administrative leadership at the Flotilla level. The actual administrative transition requires more time, thought and planning. Most of these activities will be completed by the actual time the COW ceremony is held. This instruction is broken down into two areas: I. Responsibilities of the FC elect before taking office II. Responsibilities of the FC elect upon taking office A. Responsibilities of the FC elect before taking office 1. Transfer of Records and Documents by 15 Dec. By 15 December, schedule a meeting with the outgoing FC to set a time to transfer pertinent Flotilla records and documents, (see ENCLOSURE (1) p.4) which will be necessary for smooth transition. Review the minutes and financial records of the last two flotilla meetings. Obtain a copy of the current AUXDATA records. The outgoing FC should serve as a valuable asset that can help the incoming FC overcome some early difficulties. This resource should not be overlooked. Request some stamps and envelops for your mailings in preparation for the change of office. a. District Requirements Become aware of all District-unique requirements such as deadlines for additional paperwork; unique tasks for the Boat Crew Program; any District specific currency maintenance procedures, etc. b. Forms Copies of all Auxiliary required forms can be obtained on the Auxiliary website.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Directorate of Public Relations (Navy) Tel: 021- 48506127-8, 21- 9201467, 051-20062097 PAKISTAN NAVY & UAE
    PRESS RELEASE Directorate of Public Relations (Navy) Tel: 021- 48506127-8, 21- 9201467, 051-20062097 PAKISTAN NAVY & UAE NAVY CONDUCTED BILATERAL EXERCISE NASL AL BAHR Islamabad, 23 Feb 19: Pakistan Navy flotilla comprising Pakistan Navy ships TARIQ and HIMMAT visited Abu Dhabi to participate in International Defence Exhibition (IDEX) / Naval Defence Exhibition (NAVDEX) and Bilateral Exercise NASL AL BAHR. IDEX/ NAVDEX-19 is one of the leading trade shows for Defence Technology in the region. It is an ideal platform to exhibit leading edge military technology and to share ideas in the rapidly developing world. Vice Admiral Abdul Aleem Chief of Staff (Personnel) also visited Abu Dhabi for interaction with military and civil leadership of UAE to strengthen relations between UAE and Pakistan in general and both navies in particular. Pakistan Navy Ship TARIQ hosted a reception onboard during stay at port. Mrs. Zubaida Jalal, Federal Minister for Defence Production, number of foreign diplomats, high rank military and civil officials of UAE, foreign participants of IDEX/ NAVDEX-19 and large number of Pakistani community attended the reception. Furthermore, both the ships remained open to visitors for the duration of the exhibition. Deputy Commander UAE Naval Forces Cdre Abdullah Al Shahi visited Pakistan Navy Ships TARIQ and HIMMAT and interacted with officers and crew of the ship. Vice Admiral Abdul Aleem, Chief of Staff (Personnel) was also present onboard. Deputy Commander UAE Naval Forces conveyed profound gratitude of Commander UAE Naval Forces for Pakistan Navy’s participation in IDEX/ NAVDEX. Pakistan Navy and UAE Navy also conducted Bilateral Exercise NASL AL BAHR which was aimed to enhance interoperability between both the brotherly navies.
    [Show full text]
  • Commodore John Barry
    Commodore John Barry Day, 13th September Commodore John Barry (1745-1803) a native of County Wexford, Ireland was a Continental Navy hero of the American War for Independence. Barry’s many victories at sea during the Revolution were important to the morale of the Patriots as well as to the successful prosecution of the War. When the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and construction of the United States Navy, President George Washington turned to Barry to build and lead the nation’s new US Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy. On 22 February 1797, President Washington conferred upon Barry, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain with “Commission No. 1,” United States Navy, effective 7 June 1794. Barry supervised the construction of his own flagship, the USS UNITED STATES. As commander of the first United States naval squadron under the Constitution, which included the USS CONSTITUTION (“Old Ironsides”), Barry was a Commodore with the right to fly a broad pennant, which made him a flag officer. Commodore John Barry By Gilbert Stuart (1801) John Barry served as the senior officer of the United States Navy, with the title of “Commodore” (in official correspondence) under Presidents George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. The ships built by Barry, and the captains selected, as well as the officers trained, by him, constituted the United States Navy that performed outstanding service in the “Quasi-War” with France, in battles with the Barbary Pirates and in America’s Second War for Independence (the War of 1812).
    [Show full text]
  • Person Name - Prefix a Table of Salutations That May Precede an Individual’S Name to Identify Social Status
    Person Name - Prefix A table of salutations that may precede an individual’s name to identify social status. Accurate and uniform information is key to exchanging data. The table below is the recommended format for an individuals name prefix. Note: Military abbreviations are provided in Non Department of National Defence writing format as per "The Canadian Style, A Guide to Writing and Editing" published in 1997. Prefix Abbreviation Second Lieutenant 2nd Lieut. Acting Sub-Lieutenant Acting Sub-Lieutenant Able Seaman A.B. Abbot Ab. Archbishop Abp. Admiral Admiral Brigadier-General Brig.-Gen Brother Bro. Base Chief Petty Officer BsCPO Captain Capt. Commander Cmdr. Chief Chief Commodore Commodore Colonel Col. Constable Const. Corporal Cpl. Chief Petty Officer 1st class Chief Petty Officer, 1st class Chief Petty Officer 2nd class Chief Petty Officer, 2nd class Constable Cst. Chief Warrant Officer Chief Warrant Officer Doctor Dr. Bishop (Episcopus) Episc Your Excellency Exc. Father Fr. General Gen. Her Worship Her Worship Her Excellency HerEx His Worship His Worship His Excellency HisEx Honourable Hon. Lieutenant-Commander Lt.-Cmdr Lieutenant-Colonel Lt.-Col Lieutenant-General Lt.-Gen Leading Seaman L.S. Lieutenant Lieut. Monsieur M. Person Name - Prefix Prefix Abbreviation Master Ma. Madam Madam Major Maj. Mayor Mayor Master Corporal Master Corporal Major-General Maj.-Gen Miss Miss Mademoiselle Mlle. Madame Mme. Mister Mr. Mistress Mrs. Ms Ms. Master Seaman M.S. Monsignor Msgr. Monsieur Mssr. Master Mstr Master Warrant Officer Master Warrant Officer Naval Cadet Naval Cadet Officer Cadet Officer Cadet Ordinary Seaman O.S. Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 2nd class Petty Officer, 2nd class Professor Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine
    A HOUSE BUILT ON SAND: Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine E. Taylor Francis Major, USAF Air University James B. Hecker, Lieutenant General, Commander and President LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Brad M. Sullivan, Major General, Commander AIR UNIVERSITY LEMAY CENTER FOR DOCTRINE DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION A House Built on Sand: Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine E. Taylor Francis, Major, USAF Lemay Paper No. 6 Air University Press Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Air University Commander and President Accepted by Air University Press May 2019 and published April 2020. Lt Gen James B. Hecker Commandant and Dean, LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maj Gen Brad Sullivan Director, Air University Press Lt Col Darin M. Gregg Project Editor Dr. Stephanie Havron Rollins Illustrator Daniel Armstrong Print Specialist Megan N. Hoehn Distribution Diane Clark Disclaimer Air University Press Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied 600 Chennault Circle, Building 1405 within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily repre- Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6010 sent the official policy or position of the organizations with which https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/ they are associated or the views of the Air University Press, LeMay Center, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AirUnivPress Defense, or any other US government agency. This publication is cleared for public release and unlimited distribution. and This LeMay Paper and others in the series are available electronically Twitter: https://twitter.com/aupress at the AU Press website: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/ LeMay-Papers/.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]