The Speculative Grammarian Essential Guide to Linguistics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Speculative Grammarian Essential Guide to Linguistics The Speculative Grammarian Essential Guide to Linguistics Trey Jones Keith W. Slater Bill Spruiell Tim Pulju David J. Peterson Speculative Grammarian Press Washington • • Mount Pleasant • Hanover • Santa Ana © MMXIII Speculative Grammarian and the editors and authors of this book. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without written permission from the authors, except that articles may be copied for not-for-profit educational use. Speculative Grammarian, SpecGram, and all related indicia are trademarks of and © Speculative Grammarian. All previously published works are used by permission of the original authors, or were in the public domain at the time of publication. Speculative Grammarian is a virtual organization with offices, editors, and contributors worldwide. You can contact SpecGram at [email protected] or on the web at http://SpecGram.com. Speculative Grammarian Press • Washington • • Mount Pleasant • Hanover • Santa Ana East Lansing • Houston • Santa Barbara • አዲስ አበባ • • Αθήνα • Chicago • Erfurt Galveston • ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ • Москва • Nauru • • New Orleans • Paris • Parnell • Reykjavík Vienna • Երեւան • • תל אביב-יפו • Rome • • • ᏓᎵᏆ • თბილისი First edition published 2013. v1.003 ISBN 13: 978-0-615-84586-9 ISBN 10: 0-615-84586-X This book was typeset by Trey Jones in the Gentium, P22 Underground, and Trajan Pro font families— despite the nefarious will and ongoing sabotage of Microsoft Word. Table of Contents Preface xiii Introduction 1 Linguistics: The Scientific Study of Language 3 An Introduction to Linguistics in Haiku Form—Anonymous 3 European Linguistics in the Late 19th Century—Tim Pulju 5 Saussure and Bloomfield: The Question of Influence—Tim Pulju 8 Extract from an Interview with Eglantine Lady Fantod, Dowager Professor of 10 Philology at Cambridge University—Freya Shipley Scientific Linguistics—James Coffey and Mark Matney 12 Why Linguistics Doesn’t Care—Xerxes Yuniqqi Zikiwik 14 Reanalysis of Spanish by Naïve Linguists—Chesterton Wilburfors Gilchrist, Jr. 17 Ten New Commandments for Linguists—Transcribed from the original 19 Stone Tablets by Trey Jones The Effect of Lax Rearing Practices on Speech Patterns—Douglas S. Files 20 We ’Uns Need Us a Prescriptive Grammarian— 21 Appalachian Regional University Phonetics 23 The Itsy Bitsy Air Puff—Yune O. Hūū, II 23 Flow, Flow, Flow Your Air—Yune O. Hūū, II 24 Eating the Wind—Claude Searsplainpockets 25 Linguistics Nerd Camp (Wandering Street Phonetician)—Bethany Carlson 29 Phonetics Roadshow—Transcribed by Freya Shipley 30 Pivotal Moments in the History of Linguistics—John Miaou and Kean Kaufmann 32 Ruminating on Consonants—Werinda Clover 33 Linguistics Nerd Camp (Labiodental Articulators)—Bethany Carlson 35 Hunting the Elusive Labio-Nasal—Claude Searsplainpockets 36 Phonology 39 Letter H and N-G—Yune O. Hūū, II 39 Granular Phonology—Keith W. Slater 41 Mandarin Tone in Historical Epic Quest Perspective—Jamin Pelkey 43 The Hidden Language of Public Seduction—Claude Searsplainpockets 44 Cartoon Theories of Linguistics—Syllables—Phineas Q. Phlogiston, Ph.D. 48 Phonotronic Energy Reserves and the Tiny Phoneme Hypothesis— 49 Dr. Equus Q. Quagga Rotokan Revelations—Franny Irchow 52 viii The Speculative Grammarian Essential Guide to Linguistics Phonological Nursery Rhymes from Linguistics Land—Yune O. Hūū, II 54 There Was an Old Linguist Low, Low, Lower Your Vowels /ini˥ mini˦ maɪni˧ mo˨/ How to Speak to Foreigners— 55 Claude Searsplainpockets & Helga von Helganschtein y Searsplainpockets Shigudo, Reluctantly—Sir Edmund C. Gladstone-Chamberlain 57 Morphology 69 Baa-baa, Reduplication—Yune O. Hūū, II 70 Morphemes—A New Threat to Society—Council On Morpheme Abuse 71 Variation in the English Indefinite Article—Tim Pulju 73 Systematic Suppletion: An Investigation of Ksotre Case Marking— 76 Lawrence R. Muddybanks, Ph.D. Examination of the Raartong Language VI—The Intoxicational Affix— 81 J. S. S. van der Fort Exploring Penguin Causatives—Robert F. Scott 84 Cartoon Theories of Linguistics—Ergativity—Phineas Q. Phlogiston, Ph.D. 86 A Reanalysis of English Cat—Hoam L. E. Orange, Ph.D. 87 An Optimality-Theoretic Account of Split-Ergativity in Southern Quiznos— 90 Hans Forz What is a Morphome?—David J. Peterson 92 Pluralses: On the Use and Abuse of Multiple Plurals— 95 Edited by Trey Jones and G. Edward Johnson Syntax 97 New Speech Disorder Linguists Contracted Discovered!—Yreka Bakery 98 The Biological Basis of Universal Grammar—Maiya Sershen 99 A Taxonomy of Argument Schemata in Metatheoretic Discussions of Syntax— 102 Anonymous The BS Node: Proof That Lines Can Cross—Knotta Gnome Luvver 104 The BS Default: A Reply to Luvver—I. M. Shirley Wright 105 An Analysis of easy-Type Adjectives—A. Word 106 Toward a Universal Typology of Noun Phrases—Cynthia Polarczik 108 Infinity and Beyond: A Prolegomena—Bjorn-Bob Weaselflinger 109 Linguistics Nerd Camp (Pyramid Model)—Bethany Carlson 111 Modern and Historical Graphical Representations of Structural 113 Relationships in Spoken and Written English Sentential Utterances— Nattapoŋ Yunloŋ Seuŋyoŋ Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Analysis 123 Maxims of Grice—Yune O. Hūū, II 123 What Part of ‘No’ Don’t You Understand?—Strang Burton 125 Table of Contents ix Tridekavalent Verbs of Telenovelity in Mydlovaskjí —Sú ̄nyatā Qoɣusun 126 Thurn and Taxonomies—Panini Press EuroSprachGames 128 Dup Evidentials—Tim Pulju 129 Greek Particles—R.S. Sriyatha 130 On Logophoric Pronouns—John Miaou 132 Cathartic Grecian Maxomes—Anne Thrax 133 A Meta-Analysis of Article Length vs. Quality— 136 Alfraad vonn Güügënschnëchtën & Mo d’Qi Sociolinguistics 139 The Out-of-Towner’s Lament—Bill L. Poe 139 Grey Duck or Goose?—Sven Slater and Ollie Bickford 140 A Sociolinguistic Study of Bilingualism in the Rio Grande Valley— 143 Hiroko Nakamura and Jimmy Battaglia An Introduction to Familial Linguistics—Herr E. Ditarie 145 Notes on Sociophonology—Lea Kim Shopmont 148 The Sociolinguistic Impact of Hippie Linguist Naming Practices— 150 ɹɒbɪn O’Jonesson Carcassonorant—Panini Press EuroSprachGames 153 Typology 155 Typology, Typology—Hymns for the Reverent Linguist (1845) 156 A New Basic Word Order: VOV—Arnold P. Fasnacht 157 Language Evolution and the Acacia Tree—Sean Geraint 163 Linguistic Topology—I. Juana Pelota-Grande 166 Rating the World’s Languages—Dikembe Mutombo and John Thompson 170 Re-Rating the World’s Languages— 171 Waxaklahun Ubah K’awil and José Felipe Hernandez y Fernandez Cartoon Theories of Linguistics—Non-Configurational Languages— 173 Phineas Q. Phlogiston, Ph.D. Acquiring Isolation—The Peculiar Case of Ghwüǘ b̀ — 175 Tashel M. Kaithe and Valencia R. O’Shaughnessy Comparative and Historical Linguistics 185 Beowulf ond Godsylla—Tom Weller 185 Reconstructed Proto-Franco-Sino-Indonesian—Eleven Examples—Tim Pulju 186 Progress in South American Protolinguistics—Robert Norris 187 A Reconsideration of the Sino-Kiowan Problem—Tim Pulju 189 Toward a New Classification of the European Languages—Dr. Medved Sem 192 Are Turkish and Amharic Related? Are They Ever!—April May June 194 Language Reveals Origins of Divinity—Right Reverend Michael Ramachendra 196 x The Speculative Grammarian Essential Guide to Linguistics A Reinterpretation of Some Aspects of the Indo-European Expansion— 198 William C. Spruiell Sociohistorical Linguistic Semiotics and Systemic Theory—Lynn Poulton 200 Grammaticalization in an Inflationary System of Signs—Frederic de Saucisson 202 Where Have All the Evidentials Gone?—R.M.W. Fillmore 205 The Life and Death of an Anonymous Verb—John Miaou 208 Ask Mr Linguistics Person—Mr Linguistics Person 209 A New Mechanism for Contact-Induced Change—H.D. Onesimus 211 The Linguist’s One Foundation—Hymns for the Reverent Linguist (1845) 212 Linguistic Fieldwork 215 To the Field Workers, to Make Much of Time—Robert, Earl of Herrick 216 How to Pay for Linguistic Fieldwork—The SpecGram Editorial Board 217 On the Applicability of Recent Theoretical Advances in Linguistics to the 219 Practice of Fieldwork—Elwin Ransom How to Do Fieldwork on Proto-Indo-European—Tim Pulju 219 How to Get a Reputation as an Impressive Fieldworker—Phil Dwork 220 Up the Mind’s Nose; With the Mind’s Finger—Claude Searsplainpockets 221 Eidetic Pronouns—Claude Searsplainpockets 225 The Laziest Language on Earth—Claude Searsplainpockets 227 Mid. after-Nguyen Knap—Mandy O. Chyryry 229 Classifying an Andean Language—Rodrigo Diaz 233 The Other Sino-Tibetan Languages— 236 Edited by Qing Daixia, Brad Davidley, Van Geordriem, Chap Hillerell, Hans Ingalillson, Mat Jamisoff, Ed Jerrymondson, Ben Pauledict, Hong Sunkai The XT-21 Uzi/Tape Recorder—Dirk’s Academic Supplies 237 Speakers of Klhatkp for Hire—Klhatkp Confederacy 237 !Kanga Tribal Research Resort—Terry Mulkern 238 The Prudent Fieldworker’s Guide to Preparation and Packing— 241 Professor Athanasious Schadenpoodle Linguistics Applied 249 The Learner’s Task—Keith W. Slater 250 The Narcolinguistic Effects of Professional Athletic Strikes— 251 George E. Will, Bruce Arena, Larry James Bird A Corpus-Linguistic Approach to Demography—Morten H. Albert 253 Comestible Morphosyntax—H.D. Onesimus 254 A Stratificational Approach to Making Macaroni and Cheese—Tim Pulju 257 How Many is Umpteen?—Ura Hogg 258 Valence and Violence: How Language Shapes Political Acts—Laurel L. Laura 260 Ready! Fire! Aim!— 261 François Achille Bazaine, Guy de Maupassant, Ambrose Bierce Table of Contents xi Linguistics for Lazy
Recommended publications
  • Prior Linguistic Knowledge Matters : the Use of the Partitive Case In
    B 111 OULU 2013 B 111 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O.B. 7500 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTA SERIES EDITORS HUMANIORAB Marianne Spoelman ASCIENTIAE RERUM NATURALIUM Marianne Spoelman Senior Assistant Jorma Arhippainen PRIOR LINGUISTIC BHUMANIORA KNOWLEDGE MATTERS University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen CTECHNICA THE USE OF THE PARTITIVE CASE IN FINNISH Docent Hannu Heusala LEARNER LANGUAGE DMEDICA Professor Olli Vuolteenaho ESCIENTIAE RERUM SOCIALIUM University Lecturer Hannu Heikkinen FSCRIPTA ACADEMICA Director Sinikka Eskelinen GOECONOMICA Professor Jari Juga EDITOR IN CHIEF Professor Olli Vuolteenaho PUBLICATIONS EDITOR Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FACULTY OF HUMANITIES, FINNISH LANGUAGE ISBN 978-952-62-0113-9 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0114-6 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3205 (Print) ISSN 1796-2218 (Online) ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS B Humaniora 111 MARIANNE SPOELMAN PRIOR LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE MATTERS The use of the partitive case in Finnish learner language Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Human Sciences of the University of Oulu for public defence in Keckmaninsali (Auditorium HU106), Linnanmaa, on 24 May 2013, at 12 noon UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2013 Copyright © 2013 Acta Univ. Oul. B 111, 2013 Supervised by Docent Jarmo H. Jantunen Professor Helena Sulkala Reviewed by Professor Tuomas Huumo Associate Professor Scott Jarvis Opponent Associate Professor Scott Jarvis ISBN 978-952-62-0113-9 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0114-6 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3205 (Printed) ISSN 1796-2218 (Online) Cover Design Raimo Ahonen JUVENES PRINT TAMPERE 2013 Spoelman, Marianne, Prior linguistic knowledge matters: The use of the partitive case in Finnish learner language University of Oulu Graduate School; University of Oulu, Faculty of Humanities, Finnish Language, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Noun Phrase
    Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Scienze del Linguaggio The Finnish Noun Phrase Relatore: Prof.ssa Giuliana Giusti Correlatore: Prof. Guglielmo Cinque Laureanda: Lena Dal Pozzo Matricola: 803546 ANNO ACCADEMICO: 2006/2007 A mia madre Table of contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………….…….…… III Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………........ V Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………VII 1. Word order in Finnish …………………………………………………………………1 1.1 The order of constituents in the clause …………………………………………...2 1.2 Word order and interpretation .......……………………………………………… 8 1.3 The order of constituents in the Nominal Expression ………………………… 11 1.3.1. Determiners and Possessors …………………………………………………12 1.3.2. Adjectives and other modifiers …………………………………………..… 17 1.3.2.1 Adjectival hierarchy…………………………………………………………23 1.3.2.2 Predicative structures and complements …………………………………26 1.3.3 Relative clauses …………………………………………………………….... 28 1.4 Conclusions ............……………………………………………………………. 30 2. Thematic relations in nominal expressions ……………………………………….. 32 2.1 Observations on Argument Structure ………………………………….……. 32 2.1.1 Result and Event nouns…………………………………………………… 36 2.2 Transitive nouns ………………………………………………………………... 38 2.2.1 Compound nouns ……………….……………………………………... 40 2.2.2 Intransitive nouns derived from transitive verbs …………………… 41 2.3 Passive nouns …………………………………………………………………… 42 2.4 Psychological predicates ……………………………………………………….. 46 2.4.1 Psych verbs ……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Linguistics Society
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 7-8, 2015 General Session Special Session Fieldwork Methodology Editors Anna E. Jurgensen Hannah Sande Spencer Lamoureux Kenny Baclawski Alison Zerbe Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2015 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments . v Foreword . vii The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf . 1 Intensification and sociolinguistic variation: a corpus study Andrea Beltrama . 15 Tagalog Sluicing Revisited Lena Borise . 31 Phonological Opacity in Pendau: a Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis Yan Chen . 49 Proximal Demonstratives in Predicate NPs Ryan B . Doran, Gregory Ward . 61 Syntax of generic null objects revisited Vera Dvořák . 71 Non-canonical Noun Incorporation in Bzhedug Adyghe Ksenia Ershova . 99 Perceptual distribution of merging phonemes Valerie Freeman . 121 Second Position and “Floating” Clitics in Wakhi Zuzanna Fuchs . 133 Some causative alternations in K’iche’, and a unified syntactic derivation John Gluckman . 155 The ‘Whole’ Story of Partitive Quantification Kristen A . Greer . 175 A Field Method to Describe Spontaneous Motion Events in Japanese Miyuki Ishibashi . 197 i On the Derivation of Relative Clauses in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec Nick Kalivoda, Erik Zyman . 219 Gradability and Mimetic Verbs in Japanese: A Frame-Semantic Account Naoki Kiyama, Kimi Akita . 245 Exhaustivity, Predication and the Semantics of Movement Peter Klecha, Martina Martinović . 267 Reevaluating the Diphthong Mergers in Japono-Ryukyuan Tyler Lau .
    [Show full text]
  • The Biabsolutive Construction in Lak and Tsez
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Lingua 150 (2014) 137--170 www.elsevier.com/locate/lingua The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez Annie Gagliardi a, Michael Goncalves a, Maria Polinsky a,*, Nina Radkevich b a Harvard University, USA b University of York, United Kingdom Received 12 November 2013; received in revised form 4 July 2014; accepted 8 July 2014 Available online Abstract In ergative constructions, the agent of a transitive verb is in the ergative case and the theme is in the absolutive case. By contrast, in biabsolutive constructions, both the agent and theme of a transitive verb appear in the absolutive case. This paper presents and analyzes the biabsolutive construction in two Nakh-Dagestanian languages, Lak and Tsez. Despite many surface similarities, the biabsolutive constructions in Lak and Tsez call for different syntactic analyses. We argue that the biabsolutive construction in Lak is an instance of restructuring in the presence of an aspectual head bearing a progressive (imperfective) feature. Tsez biabsolutive constructions, on the other hand, are biclausal; we argue that the theme and the lexical verb are contained in a PP complement selected by a light verb. Related languages may be classified as ‘‘Lak-type’’ or ‘‘Tsez-type’’ based on the behavior of their biabsolutives. The existence of two underlying structures for one surface pattern in Nakh-Dagestanian poses a learnability problem for a child acquiring a language with biabsolutive constructions. We outline a set of strategies used by a learner who must compare the available input data with a set of structural hypotheses. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammar in Metaphor: a Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d9222f9 Author Sullivan, Karen Publication Date 2007 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language by Karen Sorensen Sullivan B.A. (University of Oregon) 2001 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Eve Sweetser, Chair Professor Gary Holland Professor George Lakoff Professor John Lindow Professor Richard Rhodes Fall 2007 Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language © 2007 by Karen Sorensen Sullivan Abstract Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language by Karen Sorensen Sullivan Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Eve Sweetser, Chair Over the past few decades, the conceptual metaphor revolution inspired by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) has offered considerable insight into the conceptual structure of metaphor. However, interest in the conceptual characteristics of metaphor has sometimes overshadowed the question of how metaphor surfaces in language. This dissertation tackles the issue of metaphoric language by identifying how specific linguistic resources – from grammatical constructions to poetic devices – are employed to convey the conceptual structure of metaphor. The dissertation focuses on the role of grammatical constructions in metaphoric language. In metaphoric phrases that can be understood out of context, such as bright idea, the dissertation argues that words in particular constructional slots indicate the source domain of a conceptual metaphor (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Typology and Universals
    STUF 2016; 69(1): 131–169 Ilja A. Seržant* External possession and constructions that may have it DOI 10.1515/stuf-2016-0006 Abstract: There seems to be no construction that would code specifically the possession relation of external possessors. Instead, various host constructions such as the free-affectee construction (a subtype of which is the free-dative con- struction), monotransitive or applicative construction can – to a different degree – accommodate participants that are bound by a possession relation. The binding procedure identifying the possessor operates at the pragmatic-semantic interface and takes into account the semantic roles of the event participants, their discourse saliency and lexical properties (such as animacy), world knowledge, properties of the possessum (such as the degree of (in)alienability), etc. The external-possession relation and the meaning of the hosting construction are orthogonal to each other, but there is a strong interplay between them. Positing a dedicated external-possessor construction faces the following problems: the same binding procedure is found in other constructions as well (such as the monotransitive or ditransitive construc- tions); at the same time, the very possession relation is only inconsistently found in constructions referred to as external-possessor constructions, and, what is more, the possession relation may sometimes be canceled (even if it is inalienable). To account for this terminologically, I introduce the term non-thematic affectee construction,a subtype of which is the free (non-thematic) affectee construction particularly spread in European languages. The latter is found with different types of coding (accusative, dative, different prepositional phrases) which have different diachronic sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Janne Bondi Johannessen (Ed.)
    Oslo Studies in Language 3 (2) / 2011 Janne Bondi Johannessen (ed.) Language Variation Infrastructure Papers on selected projects Oslo Studies in Language General editors: Atle Grønn and Dag Haug Editorial board International: Henning Andersen, Los Angeles (historical linguistics) Östen Dahl, Stockholm (typology) Laura Janda, Tromsø/UNC Chapel Hill (Slavic linguistics, cognitive linguistics) Terje Lohndal, Maryland (syntax and semantics) Torgrim Solstad, Stuttgart (German linguistics, semantics and pragmatics) Arnim von Stechow, Tübingen (semantics and syntax) National: Johanna Barðdal, Bergen (construction grammar) Øystein Vangsnes, Tromsø (Norwegian, dialect syntax) Local: Cecilia Alvstad, ILOS (Spanish, translatology) Hans Olav Enger, ILN (Norwegian, cognitive linguistics) Ruth E. Vatvedt Fjeld, ILN (Norwegian, lexicography) Jan Terje Faarlund, CSMN, ILN (Norwegian, syntax) Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, ILOS (German, contrastive linguistics) Carsten Hansen, CSMN, IFIKK (philosophy of language) Christoph Harbsmeier, IKOS (Chinese, lexicography) Hilde Hasselgård, ILOS (English, corpus linguistics) Hans Petter Helland, ILOS (French, syntax) Janne Bondi Johannessen, ILN, Text Laboratory (Norwegian, language technology) Kristian Emil Kristoffersen, ILN (cognitive linguistics) Helge Lødrup, ILN (syntax) Gunvor Mejdell, IKOS (Arabic, sociolinguistics) Christine Meklenborg Salvesen, ILOS (French linguistics, historical linguistics) Diana Santos, ILOS (Portuguese linguistics, computational linguistics) Ljiljana Saric, ILOS (Slavic linguistics) Bente Ailin Svendsen, ILN (second language acquisition) Oslo Studies in Language 3 (2) / 2011 Janne Bondi Johannessen (ed.) Language Variation Infrastructure Papers on selected projects Oslo Studies in Language, 3(2), 2011. Janne Bondi Johannessen (ed.): Language Variation Infrastructure. Papers on selected projects. Oslo, University of Oslo ISSN 1890-9639 © 2011 the authors Set in LATEX fonts Gentium Book Basic and Linux Libertine by Rune Lain Knudsen, Vladyslav Dorokhin and Atle Grønn. Cover design by UniPub publishing house.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammatical Case in Estonian
    Grammatical Case in Estonian Merilin Miljan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh September 2008 Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is of my own composition, and that it contains no material previously submitted for the award of any other degree. The work reported in this thesis has been executed by myself, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. Merilin Miljan ii Abstract The aim of this thesis is to show that standard approaches to grammatical case fail to provide an explanatory account of such cases in Estonian. In Estonian, grammatical cases form a complex system of semantic contrasts, with the case-marking on nouns alternating with each other in certain constructions, even though the apparent grammatical functions of the noun phrases themselves are not changed. This thesis demonstrates that such alternations, and the differences in interpretation which they induce, are context dependent. This means that the semantic contrasts which the alternating grammatical cases express are available in some linguistic contexts and not in others, being dependent, among other factors, on the semantics of the case- marked noun and the semantics of the verb it occurs with. Hence, traditional approaches which treat grammatical case as markers of syntactic dependencies and account for associated semantic interpretations by matching cases directly to semantics not only fall short in predicting the distribution of cases in Estonian but also result in over-analysis due to the static nature of the theories which the standard approach to case marking comprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Case in Finnish
    Structural Case in Finnish Paul Kiparsky Stanford University 1 Introduction 1.1 Morphological case and abstract case The fundamental fact that any theory of case must address is that morphological form and syntactic function do not stand in a one-to-one correspondence, yet are systematically related.1 Theories of case differ in whether they define case categories at a single structural level of representation, or at two or more levels of representation. For theories of the first type, the mismatches raise a dilemma when morphological form and syntactic function diverge. Which one should the classification be based on? Generally, such single-level approaches determine the case inventory on the basis of morphology using paradigmatic contrast as the basic criterion, and propose rules or constraints that map the resulting cases to grammatical relations. Multi-level case theories deal with the mismatch between morphological form and syntactic function by distinguishing morphological case on the basis of form and abstract case on the basis of function. Approaches that distinguish between abstract case and morphological case in this way typically envisage an interface called “spellout” that determines the relationship between them. In practice, this outlook has served to legitimize a neglect of inflectional morphol- ogy. The neglect is understandable, for syntacticians’ interest in morphological case is naturally less as a system in its own right than as a diagnostic for ab- stract case and grammatical relations. But it is not entirely benign: compare the abundance of explicit proposals about how abstract cases are assigned with the minimal attention paid to how they are morphologically realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Dieter Wunderlich Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf 1
    ON THE NATURE OF DATIVE IN HUNGARIAN Dieter Wunderlich Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf 1. Introduction Surveying the recent literature on case it seems still to be an open question of whether dative is a structural or a semantic case.1 Generative linguists often assume the possibil- ity of alternation to be the defining criterion for structural case. Accusative is regarded as structural because it alternates with nominative in the passive, while dative is re- garded as non-structural because it mostly does not alternate with nominative or accusa- tive. Therefore, dative is claimed to be a semantic case. However, dative marks a variety of semantic roles such as recipient, beneficiary, experiencer, and possessor, while the semantic range of undoubtedly semantic cases such as instrumental or ablative is much narrower. The fact that dative is less involved in alternations than accusative could be explained by the fact that it is more marked than accusative. In order to resolve the question one has to consider other diagnostics for structural case, and one has to provide a theory that gives a principled account for the occurrence of dative in either structural or semantic terms. In this paper I will pursue the idea that dative is a structural case, with emphasis on Hungarian. More precisely, I will argue that all instances of the Hun- garian dative are structural, even if they are assigned lexically.2 Morphologically, the Hungarian dative is more similar to semantic cases than to accusative. The dative suffix /nEk/ has a CVC structure and cannot be attached to a pro- noun: (1b), corresponding to (1a), is ungrammatical; the correct form for the dative- inflected pronoun is (1c), with the possessor affix attached to the case root, correspond- ing to a semantic case such as the instrumental in (1d).
    [Show full text]
  • Noun Cases of Hungarian Language in Romanian
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SAPIENTIAE, PHILOLOGICA, 6, 3 (2014) 295–315 Noun Cases of Hungarian Language in Romanian Csaba Attila BOTH Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Cluj-Napoca Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Târgu-Mureş bothcsabaattila@gmail .com Abstract. In the present-day discourse of bilingualism in Transylvania, the investigation of methods and possibilities for language teaching has an important role . In Romania, it is compulsory for the members of linguistic minorities to learn and to use the language of the state, but at the same time they face a number of problems in the process of learning it . To reconsider the methods of language teaching, there is need for studies which outline the particularities of language use of Romanian of Hungarian speakers . This paper is aimed at presenting a part of this image by analysing how the Hungarian language and the cognitive features entailed influence the translation of noun cases into the Romanian language . The paper presents the 18 noun cases and the prepositions they can be translated with into Romanian. Keywords: noun case, case suffix, preposition, translation, language use Introduction In Romanian, it is compulsory for the members of linguistic minorities to learn and to use the language of the state (the Romanian language) . In the process of language learning, the Hungarian learner faces a number of problems, which are caused by several factors, e .g . the very different language system of Hungarian from Romanian, cognitive issues (e .g ., different perceptions and divisions of the space) etc . It is a fact that the teaching of the Romanian language for the minorities does not have a well-structured framework, proper teaching materials and even proper methods .
    [Show full text]
  • Argument Structure and Functional Projections in Old Hungarian Verbal Gerunds1
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Argument structure and functional projections in Old Hungarian verbal gerunds1 Éva Dékány Abstract This paper seeks to give a syntactic analysis of Old Hungarian verbal gerunds. I take the "mixed projection" approach to nominalizations (Bresnan 1997, Borsley & Kornfilt 2000, Alexiadou 2001, a.o.), whereby the extended vP is embedded under nominal functional categories. I argue that in the verbal part of the gerund there is solid evidence for AspP/PredP dominating VoiceP, but there is no conclusive evi- dence for a TP being projected. I suggest that the object of the gerundival verb may undergo scrambling to a position above negation, while the subject becomes a derived possessor on the surface. I propose that these gerunds do not contain a nominalizer (see Alexiadou 2005, Alexiadou et al. 2010b; 2011 for this possibility); the extended vP is embedded directly under the nominal functional head Poss. Keywords: gerund, mixed projection, nominalization, possessor, Old Hungarian 1 Introduction Old Hungarian (896–1526 A.D.) features a wide variety of non-finite verb forms: in addition to an infinitive, it also has several types of adjectival and adverbial participles as well as two types of gerunds. This paper focuses on the syntactic structure of one of the Old Hungarian gerunds: that marked by the suffix -t (1).2 (1) harom´Zèr tagac-me´ g´ [èngem-èt eSmèr-t-ed-èt] three.time deny-PRT I-ACC know-t-2SG-ACC `you deny your knowing me three times’ (Munich C.
    [Show full text]