DOCSLIB.ORG

Offworld Trading Company Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Offworld Trading Company Al 1 CONTENTS Offworld Trading Company Strategy Guide .................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 2. General Concepts ................................................................................................................. 6 a. Overall Strategy ............................................................................................................ 6 b. Stock ............................................................................................................................. 6 c. Debt .................................................................................................................................. 7 d. Resources ...................................................................................................................... 9 e. Buildings ........................................................................................................................ 11 f. The Black Market ........................................................................................................... 12 g. Player Controls ........................................................................................................... 13 3. General Information ........................................................................................................... 14 a. Company types ............................................................................................................... 14 b. Buildings ..................................................................................................................... 15 c. Black Market .................................................................................................................. 17 d. Match Runout ............................................................................................................. 20 e. Game Facts ..................................................................................................................... 20 4. Strategy .............................................................................................................................. 22 a. Tactics ............................................................................................................................ 22 b. 1v1 Skirmish ............................................................................................................... 26 c. 4 player FFA................................................................................................................... 29 5. Examples ............................................................................................................................ 31 6. Final Words ........................................................................................................................ 40 Campaign ...................................................................................................................................... 41 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 41 7 Sols ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Campaign .................................................................................................................................. 42 Campaign Flow ......................................................................................................................... 43 CEOs ......................................................................................................................................... 45 Maisie Song .......................................................................................................................... 45 Reni-6 .................................................................................................................................... 46 Frank Dawson ....................................................................................................................... 46 Ilana Kamat ........................................................................................................................... 47 Anastasia Xu ......................................................................................................................... 47 Paulo Rubini.......................................................................................................................... 48 Joji-5 ..................................................................................................................................... 48 Sam Moreno .......................................................................................................................... 49 Silas Crichton ........................................................................................................................ 49 Campaign Perks ........................................................................................................................ 50 Unlock HQ Perks .................................................................................................................. 50 2 CEO Specific Perks............................................................................................................... 50 Advanced Building Reward Perks ........................................................................................ 51 Free Buildings ....................................................................................................................... 51 Free Patents ........................................................................................................................... 51 Free Sabotage ........................................................................................................................ 52 Resource Shipment Perks ..................................................................................................... 52 Tips and Tricks ......................................................................................................................... 52 Final Thoughts .......................................................................................................................... 54 Geologic Justification Maps ......................................................................................................... 55 1. Olympus Mons ...................................................................................................................... 55 1.1 Olympus Mons Alternate ................................................................................................ 55 2. Hellas Basin .......................................................................................................................... 55 2.1 Hellas Basin Alternate .................................................................................................... 56 3. Arcadia Planitia ..................................................................................................................... 56 4. Syria Planum ......................................................................................................................... 56 4.1 Syria Planum Alternate ................................................................................................... 56 5. Isidis Planitia ......................................................................................................................... 56 6. Chryse Planitia ...................................................................................................................... 57 7. Utopia Planitia ...................................................................................................................... 57 7.1 Utopia Planitia Alternate................................................................................................. 57 8. Sinus Sabaeus........................................................................................................................ 57 9. Sinus Meridiani ..................................................................................................................... 57 9.1 Sinus Meridiani Alternate ............................................................................................... 58 10. Tharsis Montes .................................................................................................................... 58 10.1 Tharsis Montes Alternate .............................................................................................. 58 11. Sinai Planum ....................................................................................................................... 58 12. Solis Planum ....................................................................................................................... 58 13. Valles Marineris .................................................................................................................. 59 13.1 Valles Marineris Alternate ............................................................................................ 59 14. Margaritifer Sinus ............................................................................................................... 59 15. Syrtis Major Planum ........................................................................................................... 59 15.1 Syrtis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting
    Program Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting June 12–14, 2018 • Knoxville, Tennessee Institutional Support Lunar and Planetary Institute Universities Space Research Association Convener Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Science Organizing Committee David Williams, Chair Arizona State University Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Robert Jacobsen Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Bradley Thomson Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Abstracts for this meeting are available via the meeting website at https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/pgm2018/ Abstracts can be cited as Author A. B. and Author C. D. (2018) Title of abstract. In Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting, Abstract #XXXX. LPI Contribution No. 2066, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. Guide to Sessions Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Introduction and Mercury and Venus Maps 1:00 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Mars Maps 5:30 p.m. Strong Hall Poster Area Poster Session: 2018 Planetary Geologic Mappers Meeting Wednesday, June 13, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room GIS and Planetary Mapping Techniques and Lunar Maps 1:15 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Asteroid, Dwarf Planet, and Outer Planet Satellite Maps Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Optional Field Trip to Appalachian Mountains Program Tuesday, June 12, 2018 INTRODUCTION AND MERCURY AND VENUS MAPS 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Chairs: David Williams Devon Burr 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Atypical Landslides in the Nilosyrtis Region of Mars Anthony Guimpier, Susan Conway, Nicolas Mangold
    Atypical landslides in the Nilosyrtis region of Mars Anthony Guimpier, Susan Conway, Nicolas Mangold To cite this version: Anthony Guimpier, Susan Conway, Nicolas Mangold. Atypical landslides in the Nilosyrtis region of Mars. 14th Europlanet Science Congress, Oct 2020, held online, Unknown Region. 10.5194/epsc2020- 746. hal-03091587 HAL Id: hal-03091587 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03091587 Submitted on 7 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. EPSC Abstracts Vol. 14, EPSC2020-746, 2020, updated on 07 Jan 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-746 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Atypical landslides in the Nilosyrtis region of Mars Anthony Guimpier, Susan Conway, and Nicolas Mangold Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique CNRS UMR6112, University of Nantes, France ([email protected]) Introduction:This study focuses on four unusual landslides located inside a 25 km diameter impact crater located in Nilosyrtis Mensae (Fig.1). Our initial study revealed that one of these landslides bears close similarity to a mudslide on Earth [1]. We performed a detailed morphological analysis and a comparison with terrestrial analogues to better understand their formation mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Curiosity's Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars
    Curiosity’s Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars K. S. Edgett – 27 September 2010 Simulated view from Curiosity rover in landing ellipse looking toward the field area in Gale; made using MRO CTX stereopair images; no vertical exaggeration. The mound is ~15 km away 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 in this view. Note that one would see Gale’s SW wall in the distant background if this were Edgett, 1 actually taken by the Mastcams on Mars. Gale Presents Perhaps the Thickest and Most Diverse Exposed Stratigraphic Section on Mars • Gale’s Mound appears to present the thickest and most diverse exposed stratigraphic section on Mars that we can hope access in this decade. • Mound has ~5 km of stratified rock. (That’s 3 miles!) • There is no evidence that volcanism ever occurred in Gale. • Mound materials were deposited as sediment. • Diverse materials are present. • Diverse events are recorded. – Episodes of sedimentation and lithification and diagenesis. – Episodes of erosion, transport, and re-deposition of mound materials. 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 2 Gale is at ~5°S on the “north-south dichotomy boundary” in the Aeolis and Nepenthes Mensae Region base map made by MSSS for National Geographic (February 2001); from MOC wide angle images and MOLA topography 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 3 Proposed MSL Field Site In Gale Crater Landing ellipse - very low elevation (–4.5 km) - shown here as 25 x 20 km - alluvium from crater walls - drive to mound Anderson & Bell
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Offworld Trading Company ​V1.21 Brings Updated Language Support
    Offworld Trading Company v1.21 brings updated ​ language support for both base game and DLCs The best selling economic real-time strategy game now have updated translations in Simplified Chinese, Russian, German, and more. Plymouth, MI. – November 1, 2018 - Today, Stardock announced the release of v1.21 for ​ Offworld Trading Company, a game in which players take on the role of entrepreneur and travel ​ ​ ​ to Mars for an economic showdown against rival companies. The version update improves localization for several languages and adds some balance updates that enhance the gameplay experience. In Offworld Trading Company, players buy out the competition and take control of the Martian ​ ​ market in a strategy game where money, not military force, is their greatest weapon. The ​ real-time, player-driven market is the foundation of the game, allowing players to buy and sell resources and materials - even the food and water that the colonists need to survive. Players will also have to deal with some underhanded black market methods of sabotage, like pirate raiders, hackers trying to disrupt production, covert electromagnetic pulses, and more. The game supports online match play with up to 8 players, as well as single player campaigns, skirmishes, or daily challenges. For more serious players, ranked ladder games will give them the opportunity to earn ranks and prove their worth. The v1.21 update adds improved localization in both the base game and all of Offworld Trading ​ Company’s DLC for the following languages: ​ ● Simplified Chinese ● German ● French ● Spanish ● Korean ● Polish ● Russian ● Brazilian Portuguese Offworld Trading Company is $19.99 through Steam or Stardock.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Seepage Landscapes from Distant and Local Sources in Experiments and on Mars
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 389–408, 2015 www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/389/2015/ doi:10.5194/esurf-3-389-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Groundwater seepage landscapes from distant and local sources in experiments and on Mars W. A. Marra1, S. J. McLelland2, D. R. Parsons2, B. J. Murphy2, E. Hauber3, and M. G. Kleinhans1 1Faculty of Geosciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands 2Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK 3Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Planetenforschung, Rutherfordstraße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: W. A. Marra ([email protected]) Received: 4 February 2015 – Published in Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss.: 19 February 2015 Revised: 18 June 2015 – Accepted: 3 July 2015 – Published: 4 August 2015 Abstract. Valleys with theater-shaped heads can form due to the seepage of groundwater and as a result of knickpoint (waterfall) erosion generated by overland flow. This ambiguity in the mechanism of formation ham- pers the interpretation of such valleys on Mars, particularly since there is limited knowledge of material prop- erties. Moreover, the hydrological implications of a groundwater or surface water origin are important for our understanding of the evolution of surface features on Mars, and a quantification of valley morphologies at the landscape scale may provide diagnostic insights on the formative hydrological conditions. However, flow pat- terns and the resulting landscapes produced by different sources of groundwater are poorly understood. We aim to improve the understanding of the formation of entire valley landscapes through seepage processes from dif- ferent groundwater sources that will provide a framework of landscape metrics for the interpretation of such systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Distribution of Dust in the Martian Atmosphere During Northern Spring and Summer: High‐Altitude Tropical Dust Maximum at Northern Summer Solstice N
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 116, E01007, doi:10.1029/2010JE003692, 2011 Vertical distribution of dust in the Martian atmosphere during northern spring and summer: High‐altitude tropical dust maximum at northern summer solstice N. G. Heavens,1,2 M. I. Richardson,3 A. Kleinböhl,4 D. M. Kass,4 D. J. McCleese,4 W. Abdou,4 J. L. Benson,4 J. T. Schofield,4 J. H. Shirley,4 and P. M. Wolkenberg4 Received 7 July 2010; revised 2 November 2010; accepted 12 November 2010; published 20 January 2011. [1] The vertical distribution of dust in Mars’ atmosphere is a critical unknown in the simulation of its general circulation and a source of insight into the lifting and transport of dust. Zonal average vertical profiles of dust opacity retrieved by Mars Climate Sounder show that the vertical dust distribution is mostly consistent with Mars general circulation model (GCM) simulations in southern spring and summer but not in northern spring and summer. Unlike the GCM simulations, the mass mixing ratio of dust has a maximum at 15– 25 km over the tropics during much of northern spring and summer: the high‐altitude tropical dust maximum (HATDM). The HATDM has significant and characteristic longitudinal variability, which it maintains for time scales on the order of or greater than those on which advection, sedimentation, and vertical eddy diffusion would act to eliminate both the longitudinal and vertical inhomogeneity of the distribution. While outflow from dust storms is able to produce enriched layers of dust at altitudes much greater than 25 km, tropical dust storm activity during the period in which the HATDM occurs is likely too rare to support the HATDM.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Motivation, Spectatorship Experience and the Degree of Overlap Between Traditional Sport and Esport.”
    COMPETITIVE SPORT IN WEB 2.0: CONSUMER MOTIVATION, SPECTATORSHIP EXPERIENCE, AND THE DEGREE OF OVERLAP BETWEEN TRADITIONAL SPORT AND ESPORT by JUE HOU ANDREW C. BILLINGS, COMMITTEE CHAIR CORY L. ARMSTRONG KENON A. BROWN JAMES D. LEEPER BRETT I. SHERRICK A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2019 Copyright Jue Hou 2019 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT In the 21st Century, eSport has gradually come into public sight as a new form of competitive spectator event. This type of modern competitive video gaming resembles the field of traditional sport in multiple ways, including players, leagues, tournaments and corporate sponsorship, etc. Nevertheless, academic discussion regarding the current treatment, benefit, and risk of eSport are still ongoing. This research project examined the status quo of the rising eSport field. Based on a detailed introduction of competitive video gaming history as well as an in-depth analysis of factors that constitute a sport, this study redefined eSport as a unique form of video game competition. From the theoretical perspective of uses and gratifications, this project focused on how eSport is similar to, or different from, traditional sports in terms of spectator motivations. The current study incorporated a number of previously validated-scales in sport literature and generated two surveys, and got 536 and 530 respondents respectively. This study then utilized the data and constructed the motivation scale for eSport spectatorship consumption (MSESC) through structural equation modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanism on Mars
    Author's personal copy Chapter 41 Volcanism on Mars James R. Zimbelman Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA William Brent Garry and Jacob Elvin Bleacher Sciences and Exploration Directorate, Code 600, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA David A. Crown Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 717 7. Volcanic Plains 724 2. Background 718 8. Medusae Fossae Formation 725 3. Large Central Volcanoes 720 9. Compositional Constraints 726 4. Paterae and Tholi 721 10. Volcanic History of Mars 727 5. Hellas Highland Volcanoes 722 11. Future Studies 728 6. Small Constructs 723 Further Reading 728 GLOSSARY shield volcano A broad volcanic construct consisting of a multitude of individual lava flows. Flank slopes are typically w5, or less AMAZONIAN The youngest geologic time period on Mars identi- than half as steep as the flanks on a typical composite volcano. fied through geologic mapping of superposition relations and the SNC meteorites A group of igneous meteorites that originated on areal density of impact craters. Mars, as indicated by a relatively young age for most of these caldera An irregular collapse feature formed over the evacuated meteorites, but most importantly because gases trapped within magma chamber within a volcano, which includes the potential glassy parts of the meteorite are identical to the atmosphere of for a significant role for explosive volcanism. Mars. The abbreviation is derived from the names of the three central volcano Edifice created by the emplacement of volcanic meteorites that define major subdivisions identified within the materials from a centralized source vent rather than from along a group: S, Shergotty; N, Nakhla; C, Chassigny.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Replace This Sentence with the Title of Your Abstract
    GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN UTOPIA PLANITIA HIGHLAND-LOWLAND BOUNDARY PLAIN: SECOND YEAR RESULTS AND THIRD YEAR PLAN. J. A. Skinner, Jr., K. L. Tanaka, and T. M. Hare. As- trogeology Team, U. S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 ([email protected]). Introduction: The southern Utopia highland- pographic uniqueness in order to provide context for lowland boundary (HLB) extends >1500 km westward consistent description. To assist in unit delineation and from Hyblaeus Dorsa to the topographic saddle that description for this map region, we recently submitted separates Isidis and Utopia Planitiae. It contains a nomenclature request to the IAU to uniquely identify bench-like platforms that contain depressions, pitted the region located between Nepenthes Mensae and cones (some organized into arcuate chains and thumb- Amenthes Cavi (Fig. 1). We proposed a name for the print terrain), isolated domes, buried circular depres- 275-km-wide, gently-sloping plain in order to high- sions, ring fractures, polygonal fractures, and other light its high-standing character, relative to the smooth locally- to regionally-dispersed landforms [1-2]. The plain located north of Amenthes Cavi. We also re- objective of this map project is to clarify the geologic quested names for three impact craters in Nepenthes evolution of the southern Utopia Planitia HLB by iden- Mensae and Planum (Fig. 1), each of which have tifying the geologic, structural, and stratigraphic rela- unique ejecta and rim morphologies. tionships of surface materials in MTMs 10237, 15237, 20237, 10242, 15242, 20242, 10247, 15247, and 20247. The project was originally awarded in April, 2007 and is in its final year of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Evidence for More Widespread Carbonate- 10.1002/2015JE004972 Bearing Rocks on Mars Key Point: James J
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Orbital evidence for more widespread carbonate- 10.1002/2015JE004972 bearing rocks on Mars Key Point: James J. Wray1, Scott L. Murchie2, Janice L. Bishop3, Bethany L. Ehlmann4, Ralph E. Milliken5, • Carbonates coexist with phyllosili- 1 2 6 cates in exhumed Noachian rocks in Mary Beth Wilhelm , Kimberly D. Seelos , and Matthew Chojnacki several regions of Mars 1School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 3SETI Institute, Mountain View, California, USA, 4Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 5Department of Geological Sciences, Brown Correspondence to: University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 6Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA J. J. Wray, [email protected] Abstract Carbonates are key minerals for understanding ancient Martian environments because they Citation: are indicators of potentially habitable, neutral-to-alkaline water and may be an important reservoir for Wray, J. J., S. L. Murchie, J. L. Bishop, paleoatmospheric CO2. Previous remote sensing studies have identified mostly Mg-rich carbonates, both in B. L. Ehlmann, R. E. Milliken, M. B. Wilhelm, Martian dust and in a Late Noachian rock unit circumferential to the Isidis basin. Here we report evidence for older K. D. Seelos, and M. Chojnacki (2016), Orbital evidence for more widespread Fe- and/or Ca-rich carbonates exposed from the subsurface by impact craters and troughs. These carbonates carbonate-bearing rocks on Mars, are found in and around the Huygens basin northwest of Hellas, in western Noachis Terra between the Argyre – J.
    [Show full text]