Expression of Tachykinin Receptors (Tacr1a and Tacr1b) in Zebrafish: Influence of Cocaine and Opioid Receptors
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vasopressin Release from the Rat Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System: Effects of Tachykinin NK–1 and NK–2 Receptors Agonis
Neuroendocrinology Letters No.4 August Vol.26, 2005 Copyright © 2005 Neuroendocrinology Letters ISSN 0172–780X www.nel.edu Vasopressin release from the rat hypothalamo-neurohy- pophysial system: Effects of tachykinin NK–1 and NK–2 receptors agonists and antagonists ARTICLE ORIGINAL Marlena Juszczak Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. Correspondence to: Marlena Juszczak, Ph.D., D.Sc. Department of Pathophysiology Medical University of Lodz Narutowicza 60 90-136 Lodz, POLAND TEL/FAX: +48 42 6306187 [email protected] Submitted: July 7, 2004 Accepted: October 15, 2004 Key words: tachykinin receptors; substance P; neurokinin A; vasopressin Neuroendocrinol Lett 2005; 26(4):367–372 PMID: 16136007 NEL260405A13 © Neuroendocrinology Letters www.nel.edu Abstract OBJECTIVES: Present experiments were undertaken to study the influence of pep- tide NK–1 and NK–2 receptor agonists and antagonists as well as substance P and neurokinin A (the natural ligands for these tachykinin receptors) on vasopres- sin (AVP) secretion from the rat hypothalamo-neurohypophysial (HN) system in vitro. RESULTS: The results showed that both substance P and highly selective tachykinin 9 11 NK–1 receptor agonist, i.e., [Sar ,Met(O2) ]-Substance P, enhanced significantly AVP secretion, while the NK–1 receptor antagonist (Tyr6,D–Phe7,D–His9)-Sub- stance P (6–11) – sendide – was found to antagonize the substance P–induced hormone release from isolated rat HN system (all peptides at the concentration of 10–7 M/L). The NK–2 receptor selective agonist (β–Ala8)–Neurokinin A (4–10) was essentially inactive in modifying AVP release from the rat HN system in vitro, while neurokinin A (the natural ligand for this tachykinin receptor) was found to stimulate the AVP release; this effect of neurokinin A has been diminished by the 5 6,8,9 10 NK–2 receptor antagonist (Tyr ,D–Trp ,Lys–NH2 )–Neurokinin A (4–10). -
Strategies to Increase ß-Cell Mass Expansion
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Strategies to increase -cell mass expansion Drynda, Robert Lech Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Strategies to increase β-cell mass expansion A thesis submitted by Robert Drynda For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from King’s College London Diabetes Research Group Division of Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine King’s College London 2017 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................. -
The in Vitro Binding Properties of Non-Peptide AT1 Receptor Antagonists
Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology An Independent International Scientific Journal Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 2002; 5 (1), 75-82 The In Vitro Binding Properties of Non-Peptide AT1 Receptor Antagonists Vanderheyden PML, Fierens FLP, Vauquelin G, Verheijen I Homepage: www.kup.at/jcbc Online Data Base Search for Authors and Keywords Indexed in Chemical Abstracts EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Krause & Pachernegg GmbH · VERLAG für MEDIZIN und WIRTSCHAFT · A-3003 Gablitz/Austria REVIEWS Binding of Non-Peptide AT1 Receptor Antagonists J Clin Basic Cardiol 2002; 5: 75 The In Vitro Binding Properties of Non-Peptide AT1 Receptor Antagonists P. M. L. Vanderheyden, I. Verheijen, F. L. P. Fierens, G. Vauquelin A major breakthrough in the development of AT1 receptor antagonists as promising antihypertensive drugs, was the synthe- sis of potent and selective non-peptide antagonists for this receptor. In the present manuscript an overview of the in vitro binding properties of these antagonists is discussed. In particular, CHO cells expressing human AT1 receptors offer a well- defined and efficient experimental system, in which antagonist binding and inhibition of angiotensin II induced responses could be measured. From these studies it appeared that all investigated antagonists were competitive with respect to angiotensin II and bind to a common or overlapping binding site on the receptor. Moreover this model allowed us to describe the mecha- nism by which certain antagonists depress the maximal angiotensin II responsiveness in vascular contraction studies. Insur- mountable inhibition was found to be related to the dissociation rate of the antagonist-AT1 receptor complex. The almost complete (candesartan), partially insurmountable inhibition (irbesartan, EXP3174, valsartan) or surmountable inhibition (losartan), was explained by the ability of the antagonist-receptor complex to adopt a fast and slow reversible state. -
Basal Ganglia & Cerebellum
1/2/2019 This power point is made available as an educational resource or study aid for your use only. This presentation may not be duplicated for others and should not be redistributed or posted anywhere on the internet or on any personal websites. Your use of this resource is with the acknowledgment and acceptance of those restrictions. Basal Ganglia & Cerebellum – a quick overview MHD-Neuroanatomy – Neuroscience Block Gregory Gruener, MD, MBA, MHPE Vice Dean for Education, SSOM Professor, Department of Neurology LUHS a member of Trinity Health Outcomes you want to accomplish Basal ganglia review Define and identify the major divisions of the basal ganglia List the major basal ganglia functional loops and roles List the components of the basal ganglia functional “circuitry” and associated neurotransmitters Describe the direct and indirect motor pathways and relevance/role of the substantia nigra compacta 1 1/2/2019 Basal Ganglia Terminology Striatum Caudate nucleus Nucleus accumbens Putamen Globus pallidus (pallidum) internal segment (GPi) external segment (GPe) Subthalamic nucleus Substantia nigra compact part (SNc) reticular part (SNr) Basal ganglia “circuitry” • BG have no major outputs to LMNs – Influence LMNs via the cerebral cortex • Input to striatum from cortex is excitatory – Glutamate is the neurotransmitter • Principal output from BG is via GPi + SNr – Output to thalamus, GABA is the neurotransmitter • Thalamocortical projections are excitatory – Concerned with motor “intention” • Balance of excitatory & inhibitory inputs to striatum, determine whether thalamus is suppressed BG circuits are parallel loops • Motor loop – Concerned with learned movements • Cognitive loop – Concerned with motor “intention” • Limbic loop – Emotional aspects of movements • Oculomotor loop – Concerned with voluntary saccades (fast eye-movements) 2 1/2/2019 Basal ganglia “circuitry” Cortex Striatum Thalamus GPi + SNr Nolte. -
Substance P Antagonists As a Therapeutic Approach to Improving Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Neurotherapeutics: The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics Substance P Antagonists as a Therapeutic Approach to Improving Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury Robert Vink and Corinna van den Heuvel School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5005 Summary: Although a number of secondary injury factors are been implicated in learning and memory, mood and anxiety, known to contribute to the development of morphological in- stress mechanisms, emotion-processing, migraine, emesis, jury and functional deficits following traumatic brain injury, pain, and seizures, all of which may be adversely affected accumulating evidence has suggested that neuropeptides, after brain injury. Inhibition of post-traumatic substance P and in particular substance P, may play a critical role. Sub- activity, either by preventing release or by antagonism of the stance P is released early following acute injury to the CNS neurokinin-1 receptor, has consistently resulted in a pro- as part of a neurogenic inflammatory response. In so doing, found decrease in development of edema and marked im- it facilitates an increase in the permeability of the blood– provements in functional outcome. This review summarizes brain barrier and the development of vasogenic edema. At the current evidence supporting a role for substance P in the cellular level, substance P has been shown to directly acute brain injury. Key Words: Neurotrauma, inflammation, result in neuronal cell death; functionally, substance P has edema, substance P, tachykinins. INTRODUCTION to prevent further injury and improve outcome. Accord- ingly, a significant research effort has been directed at Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of identifying secondary injury factors and then developing death and disability in people under 40 years of age in novel therapies that may attenuate, or even prevent, their developed countries.1 Although the costs for treatment, action. -
Substance P and Antagonists of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor In
Martinez AN and Philipp MT, J Neurol Neuromed (2016) 1(2): 29-36 Neuromedicine www.jneurology.com www.jneurology.com Journal of Neurology & Neuromedicine Mini Review Article Open Access Substance P and Antagonists of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor in Neuroinflammation Associated with Infectious and Neurodegenerative Diseases of the Central Nervous System Alejandra N. Martinez1 and Mario T. Philipp1,2* 1Division of Bacteriology & Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA Article Info ABSTRACT Article Notes This review addresses the role that substance P (SP) and its preferred receptor Received: May 03, 2016 neurokinin-1 (NK1R) play in neuroinflammation associated with select bacterial, Accepted: May 18, 2016 viral, parasitic, and neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system. *Correspondence: The SP/NK1R complex is a key player in the interaction between the immune Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology and nervous systems. A common effect of this interaction is inflammation. For Tulane National Primate Research Center this reason and because of the predominance in the human brain of the NK1R, Covington, LA, USA its antagonists are attractive potential therapeutic agents. Preventing the Email: [email protected] deleterious effects of SP through the use of NK1R antagonists has been shown © 2016 Philipp MT. This article is distributed under the terms of to be a promising therapeutic strategy, as these antagonists are selective, the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License potent, and safe. Here we evaluate their utility in the treatment of different neuroinfectious and neuroinflammatory diseases, as a novel approach to Keywords clinical management of CNS inflammation. -
Stabilization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors by Point Mutations
REVIEW published: 20 April 2015 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00082 Stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors by point mutations Franziska M. Heydenreich 1, 2 †, Ziva Vuckovic 1, 2 †, Milos Matkovic 1, 2 and Dmitry B. Veprintsev 1, 2* 1 Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, 2 Department of Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are flexible integral membrane proteins involved in transmembrane signaling. Their involvement in many physiological processes makes Edited by: Claudio M. Costa-Neto, them interesting targets for drug development. Determination of the structure of University of Sao Paulo, Brazil these receptors will help to design more specific drugs, however, their structural Reviewed by: characterization has so far been hampered by the low expression and their inherent Daniel James Scott, The University of Melbourne, Australia instability in detergents which made protein engineering indispensable for structural and Philippe Rondard, biophysical characterization. Several approaches to stabilize the receptors in a particular Centre National de la Recherche conformation have led to breakthroughs in GPCR structure determination. These include Scientifique/Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, truncations of the flexible regions, stabilization by antibodies and nanobodies, fusion France partners, high affinity and covalently bound ligands as well as conformational stabilization Guillaume Lebon, Centre National de la Recherche by mutagenesis. In this review we focus on stabilization of GPCRs by insertion of Scientifique, France point mutations, which lead to increased conformational and thermal stability as well as *Correspondence: improved expression levels. We summarize existing mutagenesis strategies with different Dmitry B. Veprintsev, coverage of GPCR sequence space and depth of information, design and transferability Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Switzerland, Department of Biology, of mutations and the molecular basis for stabilization. -
Investigation of Candidate Genes and Mechanisms Underlying Obesity
Prashanth et al. BMC Endocrine Disorders (2021) 21:80 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00718-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Investigation of candidate genes and mechanisms underlying obesity associated type 2 diabetes mellitus using bioinformatics analysis and screening of small drug molecules G. Prashanth1 , Basavaraj Vastrad2 , Anandkumar Tengli3 , Chanabasayya Vastrad4* and Iranna Kotturshetti5 Abstract Background: Obesity associated type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder ; however, the etiology of obesity associated type 2 diabetes mellitus remains largely unknown. There is an urgent need to further broaden the understanding of the molecular mechanism associated in obesity associated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: To screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that might play essential roles in obesity associated type 2 diabetes mellitus, the publicly available expression profiling by high throughput sequencing data (GSE143319) was downloaded and screened for DEGs. Then, Gene Ontology (GO) and REACTOME pathway enrichment analysis were performed. The protein - protein interaction network, miRNA - target genes regulatory network and TF-target gene regulatory network were constructed and analyzed for identification of hub and target genes. The hub genes were validated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and RT- PCR analysis. Finally, a molecular docking study was performed on over expressed proteins to predict the target small drug molecules. Results: A total of 820 DEGs were identified between -
Atrazine and Cell Death Symbol Synonym(S)
Supplementary Table S1: Atrazine and Cell Death Symbol Synonym(s) Entrez Gene Name Location Family AR AIS, Andr, androgen receptor androgen receptor Nucleus ligand- dependent nuclear receptor atrazine 1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine Other chemical toxicant beta-estradiol (8R,9S,13S,14S,17S)-13-methyl- Other chemical - 6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17- endogenous decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthrene- mammalian 3,17-diol CGB (includes beta HCG5, CGB3, CGB5, CGB7, chorionic gonadotropin, beta Extracellular other others) CGB8, chorionic gonadotropin polypeptide Space CLEC11A AW457320, C-type lectin domain C-type lectin domain family 11, Extracellular growth factor family 11, member A, STEM CELL member A Space GROWTH FACTOR CYP11A1 CHOLESTEROL SIDE-CHAIN cytochrome P450, family 11, Cytoplasm enzyme CLEAVAGE ENZYME subfamily A, polypeptide 1 CYP19A1 Ar, ArKO, ARO, ARO1, Aromatase cytochrome P450, family 19, Cytoplasm enzyme subfamily A, polypeptide 1 ESR1 AA420328, Alpha estrogen receptor,(α) estrogen receptor 1 Nucleus ligand- dependent nuclear receptor estrogen C18 steroids, oestrogen Other chemical drug estrogen receptor ER, ESR, ESR1/2, esr1/esr2 Nucleus group estrone (8R,9S,13S,14S)-3-hydroxy-13-methyl- Other chemical - 7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16-octahydro-6H- endogenous cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-one mammalian G6PD BOS 25472, G28A, G6PD1, G6PDX, glucose-6-phosphate Cytoplasm enzyme Glucose-6-P Dehydrogenase dehydrogenase GATA4 ASD2, GATA binding protein 4, GATA binding protein 4 Nucleus transcription TACHD, TOF, VSD1 regulator GHRHR growth hormone releasing -
Conditional Ablation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Trkb Signaling Impairs Striatal Neuron Development
Conditional ablation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-TrkB signaling impairs striatal neuron development Yun Lia,1, Daishi Yuia, Bryan W. Luikarta,2, Renée M. McKaya, Yanjiao Lia, John L. Rubensteinb, and Luis F. Paradaa,3 aDepartment of Developmental Biology and Kent Waldrep Center for Basic Research on Nerve Growth and Regeneration, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390; and bNina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 Contributed by Luis F. Parada, August 2, 2012 (sent for review June 21, 2012) Neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor cascades pertaining to development, maturation, and function of (BDNF), are associated with the physiology of the striatum and the striatum remains to be delineated. the loss of its normal functioning under pathological conditions. In this study, we conditionally ablated BDNF or its receptor The role of BDNF and its downstream signaling in regulating the TrkB in corticostriatal and nigrostriatal neuronal circuits. We development of the striatum has not been fully investigated, found that Bdnf deletion in both cortex and substantia nigra led to Bdnf complete depletion of BDNF protein in the striatum. Mutant mice however. Here we report that ablation of in both the cortex displayed dramatic developmental abnormalities and neurological and substantia nigra depletes BDNF in the striatum, and leads to impairments. Furthermore, specific deletion of TrkB from striatal fi impaired striatal development, severe motor de cits, and postnatal neurons was sufficient to produce this wide range of developmental lethality. Furthermore, striatal-specific ablation of TrkB, the gene deficits. Thus, our results demonstrate that BDNF and TrkB play encoding the high-affinity receptor for BDNF, is sufficient to elicit critical paracrine and cell-autonomous roles, respectively, in the an array of striatal developmental abnormalities, including de- development and maintenance of striatal neurons. -
Opioid Receptorsreceptors
OPIOIDOPIOID RECEPTORSRECEPTORS defined or “classical” types of opioid receptor µ,dk and . Alistair Corbett, Sandy McKnight and Graeme Genes encoding for these receptors have been cloned.5, Henderson 6,7,8 More recently, cDNA encoding an “orphan” receptor Dr Alistair Corbett is Lecturer in the School of was identified which has a high degree of homology to Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow the “classical” opioid receptors; on structural grounds Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, this receptor is an opioid receptor and has been named Glasgow G4 0BA, UK. ORL (opioid receptor-like).9 As would be predicted from 1 Dr Sandy McKnight is Associate Director, Parke- their known abilities to couple through pertussis toxin- Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, sensitive G-proteins, all of the cloned opioid receptors Cambridge University Forvie Site, Robinson possess the same general structure of an extracellular Way, Cambridge CB2 2QB, UK. N-terminal region, seven transmembrane domains and Professor Graeme Henderson is Professor of intracellular C-terminal tail structure. There is Pharmacology and Head of Department, pharmacological evidence for subtypes of each Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical receptor and other types of novel, less well- Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, characterised opioid receptors,eliz , , , , have also been Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. postulated. Thes -receptor, however, is no longer regarded as an opioid receptor. Introduction Receptor Subtypes Preparations of the opium poppy papaver somniferum m-Receptor subtypes have been used for many hundreds of years to relieve The MOR-1 gene, encoding for one form of them - pain. In 1803, Sertürner isolated a crystalline sample of receptor, shows approximately 50-70% homology to the main constituent alkaloid, morphine, which was later shown to be almost entirely responsible for the the genes encoding for thedk -(DOR-1), -(KOR-1) and orphan (ORL ) receptors. -
Constitutive Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Diseases: Insights Into Mechanisms of Activation and Therapeutics
Pharmacology & Therapeutics 120 (2008) 129–148 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pharmacology & Therapeutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmthera Associate editor: S. Enna Constitutive activation of G protein-coupled receptors and diseases: Insights into mechanisms of activation and therapeutics Ya-Xiong Tao ⁎ Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, 212 Greene Hall, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA article info abstract The existence of constitutive activity for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) was first described in 1980s. In Keywords: 1991, the first naturally occurring constitutively active mutations in GPCRs that cause diseases were reported G protein-coupled receptor Disease in rhodopsin. Since then, numerous constitutively active mutations that cause human diseases were reported Constitutively active mutation in several additional receptors. More recently, loss of constitutive activity was postulated to also cause Inverse agonist diseases. Animal models expressing some of these mutants confirmed the roles of these mutations in the Mechanism of activation pathogenesis of the diseases. Detailed functional studies of these naturally occurring mutations, combined Transgenic model with homology modeling using rhodopsin crystal structure as the template, lead to important insights into the mechanism of activation in the absence of crystal structure of GPCRs in active state. Search for inverse Abbreviations: agonists on these receptors will be critical for correcting the diseases cause by activating mutations in GPCRs. ADRP, autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa Theoretically, these inverse agonists are better therapeutics than neutral antagonists in treating genetic AgRP, Agouti-related protein AR, adrenergic receptor diseases caused by constitutively activating mutations in GPCRs. CAM, constitutively active mutant © 2008 Elsevier Inc.