Golden Star Resources Ltd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Monthly Ranking of Brokerage Firms 01/09/2018 - 30/09/2018
Month: 2018-09 Monthly Ranking of Brokerage Firms 01/09/2018 - 30/09/2018 EGX Information Center - Monthly Ranking of Brokerage Firms Page 1 Issued on : 01/10/2018 01/09/2018 - 30/09/2018 Brokerage Firms in Terms of Value Traded (Main Market - OTC - NILEX) Volume Value Traded % of # of # Brokerage Firm Traded (LE) Total Trades (Share) 1 Financial Brokerage Group 6,722,889,142 17.7% 641,074,707 46,480 2 Commercial International Brokerage company (CIBC) 2,897,758,232 7.6% 446,497,430 58,700 3 Beltone Securities Brokerage 2,434,066,653 6.4% 382,741,289 32,793 4 Pharos Securities 2,360,244,245 6.2% 242,045,477 17,047 5 Arab African International Securities 2,344,724,462 6.2% 147,489,664 10,106 6 Hermes Securities Brokerage 2,154,876,769 5.7% 778,888,588 55,347 7 Arqaam Securities Brokerage 1,752,661,044 4.6% 143,967,772 27,418 8 Pioneers Securities 1,343,291,915 3.5% 534,035,101 57,215 9 Mubasher International For Securities 965,250,854 2.5% 362,095,597 41,397 10 Naeem Brokerage 945,885,668 2.5% 315,440,142 25,466 11 Sigma Securities Brokerage 934,307,496 2.5% 321,416,657 31,886 12 HSBC Securities Egypt S.A.E 859,787,800 2.3% 24,591,458 7,176 13 HC Brokerage 727,084,286 1.9% 120,338,782 19,027 14 Arabeya Online Securities 718,347,298 1.9% 335,448,129 33,686 15 Prime Securities Brokerage 602,869,331 1.6% 122,262,766 11,786 16 Shuaa securities 599,308,708 1.6% 180,864,539 15,334 17 Egyptian Arabian Company(Themar) 480,005,229 1.3% 183,291,230 20,275 18 Ifa Securities Brokerage 401,523,234 1.1% 221,943,955 8,319 19 Metro Co. -
Guyanor Ressources S.A
GUYANOR RESSOURCES S.A. GUYANOR RESSOURCES SA ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS 2004 MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY List of the directors and officers as of April 25, 2005 1,2,3 Golden Star Resources Ltd. Jean-Pierre Prévôt President, Guyanor Ressources S.A. - Co-Director of Rhums Prévôt (rum distilling), - Former President, Chamber of Commerce and Industry of French Guiana Cayenne, French Guiana James H. Dunnett Directeur-Général, Guyanor Ressources S.A. George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands 2 Peter J. Bradford President and CEO Golden Star Resources Ltd. Bogoso, Ghana 2, 3 Donald R. Getty President and Chief Executive Officer, Sunnybank Investments Ltd. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Ian L. Boxall Businessman George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (1) Under French corporate law, it is permissible for a company to be a director of another company including of its subsidiary. Allan J. Marter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Star, has been designated by Golden Star Resources Ltd. as its permanent representative in connection with proceedings of the directors of the Company. (2) Member of the Compensation Committee. (3) Member of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee. 1 Stock Exchange Listing Nouveau Marché of the Bourse de Paris Toronto Stock Exchange Symbol: GOR Symbol: GRL.T Registrar and Transfer Agent Questions regarding the change of stock ownership, consolidation of accounts, lost certificates, change of address and other such matters should be directed to: BNP Paribas Securities Services CIBC Mellon Trust -
Golden Star Resources Ltd
GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD. FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 03/29/00 for the Period Ending 12/31/99 Telephone 416 583 3800 CIK 0000903571 Symbol GSS SIC Code 1040 - Gold And Silver Ores Industry Gold & Silver Sector Basic Materials Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2014, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 3/29/2000 For Period Ending 12/31/1999 Address 10901 WEST TOLLER DRIVE SUITE 300 LITTLETON, Colorado 80127 Telephone 303-830-9000 CIK 0000903571 Industry Gold & Silver Sector Basic Materials Fiscal Year 12/31 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1999 Commission file number 0-21708 GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Canada 98-0101955 (State or other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 3000 Denver, Colorado 80264-3001 (Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code) (303) 830-9000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: Name of Exchange Title of Each Class on which Registered ------------------- ------------------- Common Shares American Stock Exchange Toronto Stock Exchange Securities registered or -
Share Capital
SHARE CAPITAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE The table below sets out details relating to our share capital as at the Latest Practicable Date. Authorised share capital(1): 3,600,000,000. Common Shares 7,200,000,000. Class A Preferred Shares Issued, fully paid or credited as fully paid(2): 3,256,724,482. Common Shares in issue 2,108,579,606. Class A Preferred Shares in issue 12. Golden Shares in issue Notes: (1) The By-laws authorise the issue of shares forming part of the authorised share capital of the Common Shares and the Class A Preferred Shares by the Board without any further approval by Shareholders. (2) Including 47,375,394 Common Shares and 99,649,571 Class A Preferred Shares in treasury. TWO CLASSES OF SHARES Our share capital is currently divided into two classes of shares: (i) Common Shares and (ii) Preferred Shares. The two classes of Shares were first issued at the time of our incorporation on 11 January 1943. The Preferred Shares are further divided into Class A Preferred Shares and Golden Shares. All of the issued Shares are registered shares with no nominal value. In accordance with our privatisation deed, the Shareholders’ meeting held after the privatisation approved the introduction of the Golden Share to be exclusively owned by the Brazilian Government which carried special veto rights over certain matters specified in the By-laws. After subsequent share splits, there are now 12 Golden Shares in issue. All of the Golden Shares are owned by the Brazilian Government. For more information on the rights attached to the Golden Shares, please refer to “Voting rights” below. -
2021-2022 Biennial BUDGET 2021 - 2022 CITY of GOLDEN, COLORADO BUDGET and CAPITAL PROGRAMS
CITY OF GOLDEN 2021-2022 Biennial BUDGET 2021 - 2022 CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO BUDGET AND CAPITAL PROGRAMS 2021 – 2022 Golden Downtown General Improvement District Budget 2021-2022 Downtown Development Authority Budget 2021 Budget Adopted by Resolution of the Golden City Council on December 3, 2020 2019 GOLDEN CITY COUNCIL Laura Weinberg, Mayor Robert Reed, Ward I Paul Haseman, Ward II Jim Dale, Ward III Bill Fisher, Ward IV JJ Trout, District I Casey Brown, Mayor Pro-Tem District II Submitted by: Jason Slowinski City Manager 2021Ͳ2022CITYOFGOLDENBIENNIALBUDGET TABLEOFCONTENTS INTRODUCTION BudgetMessage...................................................................................................................1 BudgetCalendar..................................................................................................................15 CitizensBudgetAdvisoryCommitteeMessage...................................................................17 GFOADistinguishedBudgetPresentationAward................................................................19 ϮϬϮϭͲϮϬϮϮBudgetSummaryFundTypeDescriptions.........................................................20 ϮϬϮϭͲϮϬϮϮFundStructureChart.........................................................................................24 ϮϬϮϭBudgetSummaryRevenueandExpenditureChartofallFunds.................................25 ϮϬϮϮBudgetSummaryRevenueandExpenditureChartofallFunds.................................26 ϮϬϮϭBudgetSummary–ByFundType.............................................................................27 -
Golden Rules Making the Case for Responsible Mining
GOLDEN RULES Making the case for responsible mining A REPORT BY EARTHWORKS AND OXFAM AMERICA Contents Introduction: The Golden Rules 2 Grasberg Mine, Indonesia 5 Yanacocha Mine, Peru, and Cortez Mine, Nevada 7 BHP Billiton Iron Ore Mines, Australia 9 Hemlo Camp Mines, Canada 10 Mongbwalu Mine, the Democratic Republic of Congo 13 Rosia Montana Mine, Romania 15 Marcopper Mine, the Philippines, and Minahasa Raya and Batu Hijau Mines, Indonesia 17 Porgera Gold Mine, Papua New Guinea 18 Junín Mine, Ecuador 21 Akyem Mine, Ghana 22 Pebble Mine, Alaska 23 Zortman-Landusky Mine, Montana 25 Bogoso/Prestea Mine, Ghana 26 Jerritt Canyon Mine, Nevada 27 Summitville Mine, Colorado 29 Following the rules: An agenda for action 30 Notes 31 Cover: Sadiola Gold Mine, Mali | Brett Eloff/Oxfam America Copyright © EARTHWORKS, Oxfam America, 2007. Reproduction is permitted for educational or noncommercial purposes, provided credit is given to EARTHWORKS and Oxfam America. Around the world, large-scale metals mining takes an enormous toll on the health of the environment and communities. Gold mining, in particular, is one of the dirtiest industries in the world. Massive open-pit mines, some measuring as much as two miles (3.2 kilometers) across, generate staggering quantities of waste—an average of 76 tons for every ounce of gold.1 In the US, metals mining is the leading contributor of toxic emissions to the environment.2 And in countries such as Ghana, Romania, and the Philippines, mining has also been associated with human rights violations, the displacement of people from their homes, and the disruption of traditional livelihoods. -
Limited but Not Lost: a Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions
Fordham Law Review Volume 72 Issue 5 Article 35 2004 Limited But Not Lost: A Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions Christine O'Grady Putek Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christine O'Grady Putek, Limited But Not Lost: A Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2219 (2004). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol72/iss5/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT LIMITED BUT NOT LOST: A COMMENT ON THE ECJ'S GOLDEN SHARE DECISIONS Christine O'Grady Putek* INTRODUCTION Consider the following scenario:' Remo is a large industrialized nation with a widget manufacturer, Well-Known Co. ("WK") which has a strong international reputation, and is uniquely identified with Remo. WK is an important provider of jobs in southern Remo. Because of WK's importance to Remo, for both economic and national pride reasons, Remo has a special law (the "WK law"), which gives the government of southern Remo a degree of control over WK, all in the name of protection of the company from unwanted foreign takeovers and of other national interests, such as employment. The law caps the number of voting shares that any one investor may own, and gives the government of Southern Remo influence over key company decisions by allowing it to appoint half the board of directors. -
Golden Star Resources Ltd
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of August 2020 Commission File Number 001-12284 GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD. (Translation of registrant's name into English) 333 Bay Street Suite 2400 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2T6, Canada (Address of principal executive office) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o Form 40-F þ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 included in this report on Form 6-K are each hereby incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of the Registrant, as each may be amended from time to time (File Nos. 333-105820, 333-105821, 333-118958, 333-169047, 333-175542, 333-211926 and 333-218064), and Form F-10 of the Registrant, as may be amended from time to time (File No. 333-234005), to the extent not superseded by documents or reports subsequently filed by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in each case as amended. -
Assertions, the Golden Share Was Not a Condition Ofthe 1997 Enron/PGE Merger Transaction" and in Fact, PGE Did Not Create T
assertions, the golden share was not a condition ofthe 1997 Enron/PGE merger transaction" and in fact, PGE did not create this golden share mechanism until after Enron declared bankruptcy. Once Enron declared bankruptcy in 2001, PGE worked with S&P to develop a structure to avoid future downgrades ofPGE's bond ratings. PGE opted to issue one share with special voting rights with respect to any voluntary action by PGE regarding bankruptcy. PGE chose the holder ofthe share; neither the Oregon Public Utility Commission ("OPUC") nor its staff directly selected the shareholder. In 2002, OPUC approved PGE's application seeking authority to issue the single share of $1.00 par value Junior Preferred Stock in order to further insulate PGE from the effects of the Enron bankruptcy. 80 Thus, CPB is mistaken when it claims: "In fact ... as the DPS Staffs Policy Panel testified on cross-examination by the CPB, it was the existence of a golden share provision that was the entire reason why Portland was not dragged into the Enron bankruptcy" (CPB JB at 17). This misses the key point: because the so-called "golden share" provision in Oregon was not implemented until after Enron filed for bankruptcy protection. what the case actually shows is that state regulators have the means and ability, even after a holding company bankruptcy, to work cooperatively with a utility to protect itself from the effects of a parent's bankruptcy. Staff's third and final example claims that an LPE mechanism was required as a condition of the Mid-American Holding Company C'Mid-American") and PacitiCorp merger 79 In the merger order, POE was directed to maintain its own long-term debt ratings and preferred stock ratings for as long as it had preferred stock outstanding; to maintain the common equity portion of its capital structure at 48 G/o or higher unless a different level was approved; and to file information and disclosure notices for affiliated interest transactions. -
Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Golden Star Resources, Bogoso/Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana
NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Golden Star Resources, Bogoso/Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana Effective Date: December 31, 2017 Golden Star Resources Ltd. 150 King Street West Suite 1200 Toronto ON, M5H 1J9, Canada Qualified Persons Martin Raffield, P.Eng Mitch Wasel, MAusIMM (CP) March 2018 NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Golden Star Resources, Bogoso/Prestea Gold Mine Page ii Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Property Description and Ownership ...................................................................................1 1.3 Geology and Mineralization ................................................................................................2 1.4 Exploration Status ................................................................................................................2 1.5 Mineral Resources ...............................................................................................................2 1.6 Mineral Reserves .................................................................................................................3 1.7 Mining Method ....................................................................................................................4 1.8 Recovery Methods ...............................................................................................................5 -
Lack of Proportionality Between Ownership and Control: Overview and Issues for Discussion
LACK OF PROPORTIONALITY BETWEEN OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL: OVERVIEW AND ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Issued by the OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance, December 2007 At its meeting on 14 November 2007 the Steering Group on Corporate Governance agreed on a common position based on the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance about the issue of whether there should be proportionality between ownership and control (also known as one-share-one-vote) in listed companies. Corporate Affairs Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2 rue André-Pascal, Paris 75116, France www.oecd.org/daf/corporate-affairs/ 2 Lack of proportionality between ownership and control TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 4 Summary of main findings ........................................................................................................................... 4 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................. 5 LACK OF PROPORTIONALITY BETWEEN OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL: OVERVIEW AND ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... -
Golden Star 2007 Annual Report
Golden Star 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Gold, Production & Ghana Golden Star Resources Ltd. is a mid-tier gold mining company with two operating mines in Ghana, West Africa. Production is expected to increase from our record production of 246,278 ounces in 2007 to between 370,000 to 425,000 ounces of gold in 2008. Our history of exploration success, combined with appropriate acquisitions, will provide growth opportunities for the future. Our strategy of acquiring property during the down cycle of 1999 to 2002 helped Golden Star become the dominant holder of mining properties on the prolific Ashanti Gold Trend. This land position, combined with the commissioning of our Bogoso sulfide processing plant, is the basis for gold production expansion at the Bogoso/Prestea mine and the source of future growth of the company. The Wassa mine has shown steady quarter-over-quarter improvement. While the majority of focus on the Company is directed toward the Bogoso/Prestea mine, the Wassa mine is proving to be an excellent source of profitability for Golden Star. Shares of Golden Star are widely held by both retail and institutional shareholders and are traded on the American Stock Exchange, Toronto Stock Exchange and Ghana Stock Exchange under the symbols GSS, GSC and GSR, respectively. Table of Contents 1 Highlights for 2007 14 Exploration 34 Consolidated Financial 2 Letter to Shareholders 16 Sustainability Statements 6 Mineral Reserves & Mineral 17 Selected Financial Data 64 Board of Directors Resources 18 Management’s Discussion IBC Corporate Information 9 Operations: Bogoso/Prestea and Analysis 13 Operations: Wassa Front Cover The history and evolution of Golden Star Resources rests on its employees and its physical assets.