DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-County Goods Movement Action Plan Draft Technical Memorandum 3 – Existing Conditions and Constraints Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-County Goods Movement Action Plan Draft Technical Memorandum 3 – Existing Conditions and Constraints Table of Contents Multi-County Goods Movement Action Plan Draft Technical Memorandum 3 – Existing Conditions and Constraints Table of Contents GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................... G-1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... A-1 REFERENCES ............................................................................................. R-1 E.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1 MULTI-COUNTY GOODS MOVEMENT ACTION PLAN............................... E-1 E.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS......................................................................................... E-3 E.3 EXISTING ISSUES AND CONSTRAINTS ............................................................ E-4 E.4 CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS ........................................................................ E-11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES, STUDY AREA, AND ADMINISTRATION ............. 1-1 1.2 BUILDING AN ACTION PLAN: OVERVIEW OF PROJECT TASKS............ 1-3 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THIS TECH MEMO .......................................................... 1-4 1.4 OVERALL CONTEXT.................................................................................................. 1-5 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 WAREHOUSING AND TRANSLOAD CENTERS............................................... 2-1 Overview of Warehousing in the Goods Movement Supply Chain .......................... 2-1 Warehousing Market Outlook............................................................................................. 2-4 Los Angeles County................................................................................................................ 2-10 The Inland Empire................................................................................................................... 2-10 Orange County........................................................................................................................ 2-12 Ventura County ....................................................................................................................... 2-12 Trends in Warehousing ......................................................................................................... 2-12 2.2 FREIGHT RAIL ........................................................................................................... 2-14 Rail Cargo Market Sectors.................................................................................................... 2-19 Intermodal...................................................................................................................... 2-19 Carload Traffic ............................................................................................................... 2-23 Intra-Regional Rail Traffic ............................................................................................. 2-24 Inventory of Systems .............................................................................................................. 2-24 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway......................................................................... 2-24 Union Pacific Railroad................................................................................................... 2-25 BNSF and UP Lines in the Los Angeles Basin............................................................... 2-27 Publicly Owned Track .................................................................................................... 2-30 Short Lines...................................................................................................................... 2-31 BNSF and UP Train Volume .......................................................................................... 2-32 Rail Border Crossings..................................................................................................... 2-33 Rail Processing Facilities........................................................................................................ 2-34 On-dock Intermodal Facilities....................................................................................... 2-36 Near-dock Intermodal Facilities ................................................................................... 2-36 Off-Dock Intermodal Facilities - BNSF ........................................................................ 2-37 Off-Dock Intermodal Facilities - UP............................................................................. 2-37 Carload Facilities and Support Yards ........................................................................... 2-38 Automobile Distribution Centers................................................................................... 2-39 Bulk Transfer Facilities................................................................................................... 2-39 Wilbur Smith Associates i Multi-County Goods Movement Action Plan Draft Technical Memorandum 3 – Existing Conditions and Constraints Table of Contents 2.3 ROADWAYS ................................................................................................................. 2-39 Inventory of Systems .............................................................................................................. 2-40 Truck Traffic and Goods Movement................................................................................... 2-43 Existing Volumes throughout the Study Area..................................................... 2-43 Truck Lanes............................................................................................................................... 2-51 Truck Activity by Truck Size................................................................................................... 2-52 Historical Growth Trends for Truck Travel........................................................................ 2-53 Truck Travel Patterns ........................................................................................ 2-56 Time of Day Distribution of Truck Travel ........................................................... 2-63 Time of Day in Relation to Non-Truck Traffic..................................................... 2-66 Port-Related Truck Travel.................................................................................. 2-67 2.4 PORTS ............................................................................................................................ 2-69 Air Cargo and Cargo Airports ............................................................................................. 2-71 The Overall Air Freight Structure.................................................................................. 2-71 Air Cargo Activities in the Study Area........................................................................... 2-72 Inventory of Air Cargo Systems..................................................................................... 2-73 Potential MCGMAP Air Cargo Airports......................................................................... 2-75 Ocean Cargo and Seaports ................................................................................................. 2-76 Inventory of Port Systems .............................................................................................. 2-77 Overview of Containerized Trade................................................................................. 2-86 3.0 THE MODAL SYSTEM’S ROLE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN 3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN................................................................... 3-1 3.2 INTEGRATION ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN ................................................ 3-3 Ocean Carriers ........................................................................................................................ 3-4 Railroads.................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Trucking ..................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Air Cargo Industry................................................................................................................... 3-5 Shippers..................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Third Party Logistics Providers ............................................................................................. 3-6 Technology in the Supply Chain......................................................................................... 3-6 Coordinated Logistics ............................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3 MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INTERMODAL SYSTEM ...... 3-7 Performance Optimization within the Modes ................................................................. 3-7 Lack of Industry Standards for Performance ................................................................... 3-8 The Importance of Performance Measures...................................................................... 3-9 System Performance Monitoring ....................................................................................... 3-9 4.0 CONSTRAINTS, ISSUES, AND PROBLEMS 4.1 COMMUNITY CONCERNS ABOUT AIR QUALITY, CONGESTION, AND LAND USE............................................................................... 4-1 Port Development ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016
    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016 Contents Air Cargo ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Air Service ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Finance ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Media Kit ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Role of the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ACRP 03-31: Resources Bibliography Page
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report
    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2017 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2017 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2017 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2017 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 05-2017 Agendas Ec 05-04-2017 Bd 05-11-2017
    1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 619.231.1466 FAX 619.234.3407 Agenda MEETING OF THE SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM BOARD OF DIRECTORS May 11, 2017 9:00 a.m. James R. Mills Building Board Meeting Room, 10th Floor 1255 Imperial Avenue, San Diego This information will be made available in alternative formats upon request. To request an agenda in an alternative format, please call the Clerk of the Board at least two working days prior to the meeting to ensure availability. Assistive Listening Devices (ALDs) are available from the Clerk of the Board/Assistant Clerk of the Board prior to the meeting and are to be returned at the end of the meeting. ACTION RECOMMENDED 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes - April 13, 2017 Approve 3. Public Comments - Limited to five speakers with three minutes per speaker. Others will be heard after Board Discussion items. If you have a report to present, please give your copies to the Clerk of the Board. -1- CONSENT ITEMS 6. San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) Sale of 2014 Ford E450 Starcraft Approve Paratransit Bus to First Transit, Inc. Action would authorize the negotiated sale of MTS Vehicle No. 3910 (2014 Ford E450 Starcraft, VIN #1FDFE4FS2EDB10510) to First Transit, Inc. 7. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Program of Projects for Federal Approve Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5311 Funding, Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 and FY 2018 Action would approve Resolution No. 17-7, authorizing the use of and application for $275,000 of FY 2017 and $275,000 of FY 2018 Section 5311 funds for operating assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final
    PHASE III – FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final Report Appendix B – I-15 IRP Phase III Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose...............................................................................................................................................................4 TASK 1: SUMMARY OF PROJECT STUDY REPORTS IN THE I-15 CORRIDOR................................................7 Project Study Reports .........................................................................................................................................7 Other Project Related Analysis .........................................................................................................................10 TASK 2: GOODS MOVEMENT DATA SUMMARY .............................................................................................12 Riverside County...............................................................................................................................................12 San Diego County .............................................................................................................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations for Implementation ..................................................................................15 TASK 3: TRANSIT PRIORITY TREATMENTS AND TRANSIT LANE INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Colonización, Resistencia Y Mestizaje En Las Américas (Siglos Xvi-Xx)
    COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) Guillaume Boccara (Editor) COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) IFEA (Lima - Perú) Ediciones Abya-Yala (Quito - Ecuador) 2002 COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) Guillaume Boccara (editor) 1ra. Edición: Ediciones Abya-Yala Av. 12 de octubre 14-30 y Wilson Telfs.: 593-2 2 506-267 / 593-2 2 562-633 Fax: 593-2 2 506-255 / 593-2 2 506-267 E-mail: [email protected] Casilla 17-12-719 Quito-Ecuador • Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos IFEA Contralmirante Montero 141 Casilla 18-1217 Telfs: (551) 447 53 66 447 60 70 Fax: (511) 445 76 50 E-mail: [email protected] Lima 18-Perú ISBN: 9978-22-206-5 Diagramcación: Ediciones Abya-Yala Quito-Ecuador Diseño de portada: Raúl Yepez Impresión: Producciones digitales Abya-Yala Quito-Ecuador Impreso en Quito-Ecuador, febrero del 2002 Este libro corresponde al tomo 148 de la serie “Travaux de l’Institut Francais d’Etudes Andines (ISBN: 0768-424-X) INDICE Introducción Guillaume Boccara....................................................................................................................... 7 Primera parte COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE (EJEMPLOS AMERICANOS) I. Jonathan Hill & Susan Staats: Redelineando el curso de la historia: Estados euro-americanos y las culturas sin pueblos..................................................................................................................... 13 II. José Luis Martínez, Viviana Gallardo, & Nelson
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Inter-American Foundation
    Grassroots Development J ournal of the Inter-American Foundation The IAF in Argentina VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 2003 GrassrootsGrassroots DevelopmentDevelopment 20022002 23/123/1cov1 cov1 The Inter-American Foundation (IAF), an independent agency of the United States government, was created in 1969 as an experimental foreign assistance program. The IAF works to promote equitable, responsive and participatory self-help development by awarding grants directly to organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean. It also enters into partnerships with public and private sector entities to mobilize local, national and international resources for grassroots development. The IAF’s operating budget consists of congressional Grassroots Development appropriations and funds derived through the Social Progress Trust Fund. Journal of the Inter-American Foundation Frank Yturria, Chair, Board of Directors Patricia Hill Williams, Vice Chair, Board of Directors Publication Editor: Paula Durbin David Valenzuela, IAF President Photo Editor: Mark Caicedo Foreign Language Editions: Leyda Appel Grassroots Development is published in English and Spanish by the IAF’s Office of External Affairs. It appears on the IAF’s Web site at www.iaf.gov in English, Editorial Assistant: Adam Warfield Spanish and Portuguese versions accessible in graphic or text format. Original Design and Printing: U.S. Government Printing Office material produced by the IAF and published in Grassroots Development is in the public domain and may be freely reproduced. Certain material in this journal, however, has been provided by other sources and might be copyrighted. Reproduction of such material may require prior permission from the copyright holder. The editor requests source acknowledgement and a copy of any repro- duction.
    [Show full text]
  • Final I-15 IRP Phase III Report
    Transportation Housing Economy I-15 Interregional Partnership I-15 Phase III Final Report Interregional Partnership February 2010 I-15 IRP JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP The primary goal of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (IRP) Joint Policy Committee is to review and provide policy input on Phase III of the I-15 IRP Project. The two regions seek to collaborate on mutually beneficial housing, transportation, and economic planning to improve the quality of life for the region’s residents through the identification and implementation of short-, medium-, and long-range policy strategies. The committee will meet three times during the duration of Phase III at dates and times to be mutually determined. Staff contacts: Jane Clough-Riquelme, SANDAG (619) 699-1909; [email protected] Kevin Viera, WRCOG (951) 955-8305; [email protected] MEMBERS Scott Mann (alt.) Councilmember, City of Menifee San Diego Association of Governments WRCOG Executive Committee (SANDAG) Sam Abed Riverside County Transportation Commission Councilmember, City of Escondido (RCTC) SANDAG Borders Committee Rick Gibbs Councilmember, City of Murrieta Dave Allan RCTC Commissioner Councilmember, City of La Mesa SANDAG Borders Committee Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem, City of Temecula Crystal Crawford RCTC Commissioner Mayor, City of Del Mar Jeff Stone (alt.) Patricia McCoy (alt.) Supervisor, Riverside County Councilmember, City of Imperial Beach RCTC Commissioner Chair, SANDAG Borders Committee Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) Jeff Comerchero Councilmember, City of Temecula Thomas Buckley Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Lake Elsinore WRCOG Executive Committee Bob Buster Supervisor, Riverside County Chuck Washington First Vice Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Temecula WRCOG Executive Committee AGENCY EXECUTIVES Scott Farman (alt.) Mayor, City of Wildomar SANDAG Gary L.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Seismic Design Approach for Freestanding Freight Railroad Embankment Comprised of Lightweight Cellular Concrete
    GeoCongress 2012 © ASCE 2012 1720 Development of Seismic Design Approach for Freestanding Freight Railroad Embankment Comprised of Lightweight Cellular Concrete J. Anderson1, Dr. S. Bartlett2, N. Dickerson3, and P. Poepsel4 1Geotechnical Engineer, HDR Engineering, Inc., 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68114; PH (402) 399-1000; email: [email protected] 2Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 201 Presidents Circle, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; PH (801) 587-7726; email: [email protected] 3Structural Engineer, HDR Engineering, Inc., 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68114; PH (402) 399-1000; email: [email protected] 4Senior Geotechnical Engineer, HDR Engineering, Inc., 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68114; PH (402) 399-1000; email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Recent advances in research, laboratory testing and field evaluations of lightweight cellular concrete have led to an increased understanding about its application as a geomaterial. Recently, lightweight cellular concrete has been used to construct a 40-foot high by 50-foot wide freestanding railroad embankment with vertical sidewalls near Colton, California. The embankment and flyover structures are about 7,000 feet long and consist of 220,000 cubic yards of lightweight cellular concrete. The embankment was designed to support 3 simultaneous Cooper E-80 freight railroad live loads and seismic loading from a 2500-year return period earthquake event. In order to provide an earthquake resilient material, cellular concrete was selected because of its relatively low density (25 to 37 pounds per cubic foot) and high compressive strength (140 to 425 pounds per square inch), when compared with traditional backfill materials.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz What Makes Community Forestry Work? a Comparative Case Study in Michoacan and Oaxaca, Mexi
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ WHAT MAKES COMMUNITY FORESTRY WORK? A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY IN MICHOACAN AND OAXACA, MEXICO A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by James Barsimantov June 2009 The Dissertation of James Barsimantov is approved: Professor Alan Richards, Chair Professor Daniel Press Professor Greg Gilbert i ii Table of Contents James Barsimantov – Doctoral Dissertation List of Tables iv List of Figures viii Abstract x Acknowledgements xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Research Design and Methodology 18 Chapter 3: Is Community Forestry Related to Reduced Deforestation? An Analysis of 43 Eight Mexican States Chapter 4: Does Vertical Integration Matter? Social and Ecological Outcomes of 60 Community Forestry Programs Chapter 5: Internal and External Influences: Why do some communities attain higher 106 levels of vertical integration? Chapter 6:Vicious and Virtuous Cycles and the Role of External Non-Government 122 Actors in Community Forestry in Oaxaca and Michoacan, Mexico Chapter 7: Land cover change and land tenure change in Mexico’s avocado region: 140 Can community forestry reduce incentives to deforest for high value crops? Concluding Remarks 155 Appendix 1: Field Tools 160 Appendix 2: A Theoretical Model of Deforestation with Community Forestry 168 Appendix 3: Ecological Measures - Forest Transects 176 Bibliography 194 iii List of Tables James Barsimantov – Doctoral Dissertation Chapter 2 Table 2.1. A Schematic Approach to Case Selection of Mexican Forestry 20 Communities Table 2.2. Number and Percent of Communities by Level of Vertical Integration in 21 Oaxaca and Michoacan Table 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Inland Empire Report Card
    Table of Contents ASCE Message from the Report Card Co-Chairs . 3 Introduction . 5 Who Pays for Infrastructure? . 5 Renewing and Building the Inland Empire . 5 Grading of Our Infrastructure . 6 Transportation . 11 School Facilities . 32 Aviation . 37 Energy . 43 Flood Control and Urban Runoff . 49 Parks, Recreation and Open Space . 52 Solid Waste . 56 Wastewater . 58 Water . 61 Recycled Water . 63 What You Can Do . 66 Methodology . 68 Committee Roster . 69 About ACEC . 72 About APWA . 73 About ASCE . 74 2010 Inland Empire Infrastructure Report Card 1 2 2010 Inland Empire Infrastructure Report Card REGION 9 LOS ANGELES SECTION San Bernardino & Riverside Counties Branch FOUNDED 1953 Message from the Report Card Co-Chairs Dear Friends, Even though “infrastructure” has gotten more attention over the past few years, there are many citizens who still do not fully understand the meaning of the word and why we need to care about it . For the record, infrastructure is the large-scale public systems, services, and facilities of a region that are necessary to support economic activity and quality of life . The systems that are readily used and noticed by the general public are the highway and public transportation systems, airports, school facilities, and community parks . Other systems of infrastructure that are not readily seen by the public are the underground water, sewer, and utility pipes, flood control systems that protect us from storm water runoff, and solid waste facilities . These are the “unsung heroes” of infrastructure, and are only a concern when they do not work . For example, turning on the faucet and nothing coming out, flushing the toilet and having it back-up, or putting out your trash, and no one picks it up .
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Air Cargo: Industry Perspectives
    SECURING AIR CARGO: INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND PROTECTIVE SECURITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 25, 2017 Serial No. 115–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–978 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 14:37 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\115TH CONGRESS\17TP0725\27978.TXT HEATH Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey JOHN KATKO, New York FILEMON VELA, Texas WILL HURD, Texas BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona KATHLEEN M. RICE, New York JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas J. LUIS CORREA, California DANIEL M. DONOVAN, JR., New York VAL BUTLER DEMINGS, Florida MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin NANETTE DIAZ BARRAGA´ N, California CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, Florida THOMAS A. GARRETT, JR., Virginia BRIAN K. FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania RON ESTES, Kansas BRENDAN P. SHIELDS, Staff Director KATHLEEN CROOKS FLYNN, Deputy General Counsel MICHAEL S.
    [Show full text]