The Mind Washes Its Hands in a Basin» Walter Bagehot's Literary Essays and Impure Criticism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mind Washes Its Hands in a Basin» Walter Bagehot's Literary Essays and Impure Criticism English Literature ISSN 2420-823X Vol. 2 – Num. 2 – December 2015 «The mind washes its hands in a basin» Walter Bagehot’s Literary Essays and Impure Criticism Silvana Colella (Università degli Studi di Macerata, Italia) Abstract Bagehot’s literary essays provide fertile ground for the exploration of mid-Victorian negotiations with notions of aesthetic impurity. Bagehot looked at the increasing democratiza- tion of culture and the changing habits of readers with more excitement than apprehension. His critical perspective was predicated not on an elitist form of detachment from the unrefined philosophies of the commercial classes, but on a kind of respectful proximity to the practicali- ties that affected the life of what he called the «transacting and trading multitude». In order to bring literature to business, Bagehot brought business into literature. His stance lacks purity and solemnity: standards of value imported from the business sphere co-habit with more traditional notions of aesthetic excellence; a mixture of high-brow and middle-brow concerns inspires his assessments of literary works. As this article demonstrates, Bagehot’s criticism thrives on an impure and sometimes awkward combination of aesthetic and business values. Summary 1 Introduction. – 2 The Critic and the Broker. – 3 An Experiencing Nature. – 4 Conclusion. Keywords Criticism. Economics. Literary essays. Walter Bagehot. The soul ties its shoe; the mind washes its hands in a basin. All is incongruous. (Walter Bagehot) 1 Introduction The list of possible candidates to the title of «the greatest Victorian», compiled by George M. Young in 1937, includes the eminent names of Karl Marx, George Eliot, Alfred Tennyson, Matthew Arnold, Charles Darwin, and John Ruskin (Young 1937, p. 1137). After briefly summing up their cre- dentials, Young awards the honour to none other than Walter Bagehot, «a man not too illustrious or too consummate to be companionable, but one, nevertheless, whose ideas took root and are still bearing» (p. 1138). The «robust and masculine sanity» of Victorian civilization, Young avers, finds its most eloquent expression in Bagehot’s style of essay writing (p. 1138). DOI 10.14277/2420-823X/EL-2-2-15-3 219 English Literature, 2, 2, 2015, pp. 219-236 ISSN 2420-823X Posterity has not endorsed Young’s idiosyncratic judgment. With the no- table exception of Lombard Street (1873) and The English Constitution (1867), still rated as classics by monetary economists and legal theorists respectively, Bagehot’s works have elicited scant attention. In his book- length study, The Case of Walter Bagehot (1972), C.H. Sisson revisits the essays of «the greatest Victorian» mainly to expose the alleged vulgarity of his thought: his «more refined ideas», Sisson argues, «are of an extraordi- nary vulgarity. He talks of the greatest artists as showing ‘an enthusiasm for reality’» (Sisson 1972, p. 42). Why this enthusiasm should be deemed symptomatic of vulgarity depends on Sisson’s pronounced distaste for Bagehot’s notion of reality, punctuated as it is by copious references to the world of money matters. These references appear all the more insidi- ous when they crop up in the literary essays, «putting at the centre of the intellectual stage what belongs to the periphery» (p. 41). Sisson repeatedly condemns the effrontery of the «mere man of affairs» (p. 41), the banker or the economist, who trespasses upon the preserves of specialists, criticizing Bagehot for his incapacity to appreciate a purely aesthetic experience. In Sisson’s understanding, the literary man and the banker, the critic and the economist, should not be trading partners in the intellectual arena. Yet for late Victorian and early twentieth-century readers, it was pre- cisely Bagehot’s effortless mingling of aesthetic, economic and political perspectives that qualified his impure prose as an accomplished intellec- tual achievement. Richard Holt Hutton praised Bagehot’s «excursive im- agination» which, he claimed, added «lucidity and caution» to his writing (Hutton 1891, vol. 1, p. xxvi). The American biographer, William Irvine, was even more explicit in his appreciation of the many-sided approach favoured in the literary essays: «Bagehot brought to the study of litera- ture almost every species of equipment but that of the literary historian […] the result is that his essays seem to have an added dimension. […] He writes with the ready confidence and easy adaptability of one who is ac- customed to assume many points of view, to be at home in a great variety of surroundings» (Irvine 1939, pp. 164-165). Bagehot’s economic writings have also been valued for their literary finish: Lombard Street, Forrest Morgan claimed, reads like a novel (Morgan 1891, vol. 1, p. xxi); «it is not necessary to understand it much» – John Maynard Keynes famously ob- served – «in order to enjoy it a good deal» (Keynes 1915, p. 371). The most recent publication that engages with the works of the Victorian polymath, Prochaska’s The Memoirs of Walter Bagehot (2013), pays tribute in its very shape to the hybrid style of intellectual discourse for which Bagehot has been alternatively commended and attacked. The book is a collage of un- marked extracts from Bagehot’s writings framed as a faux autobiography; it is a literary experiment in «historical reconstruction» (Prochaska 2013, p. ix) that blurs the boundaries between memoir, biography and fiction. In the hybrid shape of Prochaska-Bagehot’s memoir one can detect a rever- 220 Colella. «The mind washes its hands in a basin» ISSN 2420-823X English Literature, 2, 2, 2015, pp. 219-236 beration of the taste for the impure that marks the dialogic prose of the Victorian critic, political analyst and economist – a prose often considered «difficult to categorize» (Kimball 2002, p. 52). Though largely unread today, Bagehot’s literary essays provide fertile ground for the exploration of mid-Victorian negotiations with notions of aesthetic impurity.1 There is no systematic theory of literature at work in these essays. The attempt to formulate a theory of the «literesque», in the 1864 article on Wordsworth, Browning and Tennyson, has failed to convince even the most admiring of his critics.2 It is not Bagehot’s con- ceptualization of literary purity (or its opposite), but the cultivation of an impure critical stance in his literary essays that is worthy of closer scru- tiny. Biographical explanations have been adduced to account for Bage- hot’s peculiar critical angle. He wrote the majority of his literary essays while training and working as a banker, immersed in double-entry book- keeping during the day but devoted to literature in the evenings. Written in the intervals of business, Bagehot’s literary essays – so the argument goes – bear the impress of his occupation: he speaks like a banker with a keen eye for the practical details of mercantile life.3 There is some truth in this explanation, but the line of thinking I would like to pursue places Bagehot more squarely in the context of Victorian print culture as an organic intellectual who did not shy away from the task of orienting the cultural tastes of the middle classes and of the business community in particular. Unlike Matthew Arnold, Bagehot was relatively unperturbed by the Philistinism of his contemporaries: «I think a man ought to be able to be a ‘Philistine’ if he chooses», he writes in the essay on Crabb Robinson, «there is a sickly incompleteness about people too fine for the world, and too nice to work their way in it» (St John-Stevas 1968, vol. 4, p. 487). Bagehot looked at the increasing democratization of culture and the changing habits of readers with more excitement than apprehension. Accordingly, his critical perspective was predicated not on an elitist form of detachment from the unrefined, materialistic or even vulgar philosophies of the commercial classes, but on a kind of empathic and respectful proxim- ity to the practicalities that affected the life of the «transacting and trad- ing multitude».4 In order to bring literature to business, Bagehot brought 1 It is safe to assume that, unlike Lombard Street, the literary essays are not widely known today – hence my choice to include extended quotations from Bagehot’s texts. 2 Irvine, for instance, speaks of the «narrowness of [Bagehot’s] formula» (Irvine 1939, p. 97) when discussing his distinction between «pure», «ornate» and «grotesque» poetry. See St John-Stevas (1965, vol. 2, pp. 318-366). 3 See Irvine (1939) and Buchan (1959, p. 76). 4 This definition of the industrious middle classes appears in Bagehot’s 1856 essay «The Character of Sir Robert Peel»: «In his later career, the second Sir Robert Peel was the states- man who most completely and thoroughly expressed the sentiments of this new dynasty; – in- Colella. «The mind washes its hands in a basin» 221 English Literature, 2, 2, 2015, pp. 219-236 ISSN 2420-823X business into literature. His stance lacks purity and solemnity: standards of value imported from the business sphere co-habit with more traditional notions of aesthetic excellence; a mixture of high-brow and middle-brow concerns inspires his assessments of literary works; genius is less a ques- tion of originality than of «sagacity», a quintessentially mercantile virtue. In other words, Bagehot’s criticism thrives on an impure and sometimes awkward combination of aesthetic and business values, as I argue in this essay. Whether or not this contamination produces valuable and enduring insights, it certainly suggests a willingness to explore the contact zones be- tween high and low, élite and popular taste, the purity of art and the impurity of life which sits uneasily with the Arnoldian paradigm of disinterestedness.5 2 The Critic and the Broker In a letter written when he was familiarizing himself with the solemn art of double-entry bookkeeping, Bagehot reports: «I have hunting, banking, shipping, publishers, an article, and a Christmas to do, all at once, and it is my opinion they will all get muddled.
Recommended publications
  • Secularism/Atheism/ Agnosticism
    CHAPTER THIRTY-FOUR SECULARISM/ATHEISM/ AGNOSTICISM Vincent P. Pecora ecularism, atheism, and agnosticism belong to what Ludwig Wittgenstein called Sa “family” of ideas, yet are etymologically distinct. Two of the terms—agnosticism and secularism—are coinages of later nineteenth-century Britain, though their linguistic roots are much older. At least in Western Europe and Russia, the fi n de siècle produced a questioning of theism unlike anything that had come before. The dominant religious attitude among late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century intellectuals had been deism, the assumption that God existed but was absent from human affairs. Some deists could have been called atheists or agnostics, had the latter term been available. But deism covered, as it were, a multitude of sins between theism and atheism, and provided a useful way of avoiding deeper theological controversy. It was a perspective inspired by Galileo’s astronomy, Isaac Newton’s mechanics, the Reformation’s rejection of miracles and the papacy, and the acknowledgment after the voyages of discovery of a larger and less savage array of religious practices than anyone had previously imagined. Deism was the shared theology of the Enlightenment, from the Scottish sentimental moralists and French encyclopédistes to the American founders and the German Romantic philosophers. By contrast, the European nineteenth century unfolded in the idealistic but threatening shadow of the French Revolution, which was nothing if not virulently anti-clerical. Whether one celebrated its humanist, republican ideals with nationalist revolutionaries, or feared its anarchic violence, as did supporters of the old regimes, the French Revolution and Napoleon’s attempt at a new European order presaged a liberated and Promethean but also unregulated and disorderly future.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Reviews of Middlemarch
    C-BACK-1 10/01/2015 9:29 AM Page 678 Review Copy Appendix B: Contemporary Reviews of Middlemarch 1. From Edward Dowden, “George Eliot,” Contemporary Review 20 (August 1872): 403-22 [In this appreciative essay by a leading Shakespeare scholar of the day, the main interest in GE’s novels is not her vivid characters but, rather, the remarkable nar- rative voice in her fiction, what Dowden calls her “second self.” The dominating presence of the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) sug- gests where her contemporaries thought GE belonged in the context of European ideas. The contemporary reception of the novel, as represented by this and the reviews that follow, tells us a great deal about the Victorian world of ideas and the intellectual, aesthetic, and ethical investments of GE’s critics.] When we have passed in review the works of that great writer who calls herself George Eliot, and given for a time our use of sight to her portraitures of men and women, what form, as we move away, persists on the field of vision, and remains the chief centre of interest for the imagination? The form not of Tito, or Maggie, or Dinah, or Silas, but of one who, if not the real George Eliot, is that “second self” who writes her books, and lives and speaks through them. Such a second self of an author is perhaps more substantial than any mere human per- sonality encumbered with the accidents of flesh and blood and daily living. It stands at some distance from the primary self, and differs considerably from its fellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalrev Vol44 Iss4 Pp418 427.Pdf (5.195Mb)
    Robert H. Tener THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING HUTTON ANYONE WHO DEVOTES considerable time to the study of a minor literary figure prob­ ably feels the need to justify his work. I would certainly not except myself, for I have often observed a response of blank unrecognition when I inform scholars that I am engaged in research on Richard Holt Hutton. And since this response is fre­ quently enough exhibited by specialists in Victorian literature, I feel that I owe them some information, if not an explanation. More positively, I am convinced that Hutton has been undeservedly neglected, and that an indication of his importance is therefore overdue. One method of suggesting the significance of a critic is to show how he has been regarded by those whose opinions we can respect. It is this method that I employ here. I consider two main bodies of opinion on Hutton's dual functions of editor and critic: the views of his contemporaries, and then the attitudes of more recent writers. For thirty-six years from 1861 to 1897 Hutton was co-proprietor and literary editor of the weekly Spectator. When his colleague, Meredith Townsend, purchased the paper early in 1861 he acquired a depressed property. But though the Spectator's championship of the North during the American Civil War further jeopardized circulation, by the end of the war the paper had recovered its ground, and thereafter moved from strength to strength.1 The stages of its growing readership and influ­ ence can be traced in contemporary opinion. William Cory, for instance, in a letter to a friend on February 1, 1863, wrote: ..
    [Show full text]
  • 1934 Unitarian Movement.Pdf
    fi * " >, -,$a a ri 7 'I * as- h1in-g & t!estP; ton BrLLnch," LONDON t,. GEORGE ALLEN &' UNWIN- LID v- ' MUSEUM STREET FIRST PUBLISHED IN 1934 ACE * i& ITwas by invitation of The Hibbert Trustees, to whom all interested in "Christianity in its most simple and intel- indebted, that what follows lieibleV form" have long been was written. For the opinions expressed the writer alone is responsible. His aim has been to give some account of the work during two centuries of a small group of religious thinkers, who, for the most part, have been overlooked in the records of English religious life, and so rescue from obscurity a few names that deserve to be remembered amongst pioneers and pathfinders in more fields than one. Obligations are gratefully acknowledged to the Rev. V. D. Davis. B.A., and the Rev. W. H. Burgess, M.A., for a few fruitful suggestions, and to the Rev. W. Whitaker, I M.A., for his labours in correcting proofs. MANCHESTER October 14, 1933 At1 yigifs ~ese~vcd 1L' PRENTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY UNWIN BROTHERS LTD., WOKING CON TENTS A 7.. I. BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP' PAGE BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 1 3 iI. EDUCATION CONFORMIST ACADEMIES 111. THE MODERN UNIVERSITIES 111. JOURNALS AND WRIODICAL LITERATURE . THE UNITARIAN CONTRIBUTI:ON TO PERIODICAL . LITERATURE ?aEz . AND BIOGR AND BELLES-LETTRES 11. PHILOSOPHY 111. HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY I IV. LITERATURE ....:'. INDEX OF PERIODICALS "INDEX OF PERSONS p - INDEX OF PLACES :>$ ';: GENERAL INDEX C. A* - CHAPTER l BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 9L * KING of the origin of Unitarian Christianity in this country,
    [Show full text]
  • George Eliot's Religious Imagination
    George Eliot’s Religious Imagination George Eliot’s Religious Imagination A Theopoetics of Evolution Marilyn Orr northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www.nupress.northwestern.edu Copyright © 2018 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2018. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Orr, Marilyn, 1950– author. Title: George Eliot’s religious imagination : a theopoetics of evolution / Marilyn Orr. Description: Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017029797 | ISBN 9780810135895 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135888 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135901 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Eliot, George, 1819–1880—Criticism and interpretation. | Eliot, George, 1819–1880—Religion. | Evolution (Biology)—Religious aspects— Christianity. Classification: LCC PR4692.R4 O77 2017 | DDC 823.8—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017029797 Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. In all cases attribution should include the following information: Orr, Marilyn. George Eliot’s Religious Imagination: A Theopoetics of Evolution. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2018. The following material is excluded from the license: Earlier versions of chapters 1 and 2 as outlined in the acknowledgements. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, visit http://www.nupress .northwestern.edu/. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics in the Metropolis: a Survey of Victorian London
    HISTORIA MATHEMATICA 23 (1996), 376±417 ARTICLE NO. 0039 Mathematics in the Metropolis: A Survey of Victorian London ADRIAN RICE School of Mathematics and Statistics, Middlesex University, Bounds Green, View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk London N11 2NQ, United Kingdom brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector This paper surveys the teaching of university-level mathematics in various London institu- tions during the reign of Queen Victoria. It highlights some of the famous mathematicians who were involved for many years as teachers of this mathematics, including Augustus De Morgan, James Joseph Sylvester, and Karl Pearson. The paper also investigates the wide variety of teaching establishments, including mainly academic institutions (University College, King's College), the military colleges (Royal Military Academy, Woolwich and Royal Naval College, Greenwich), the women's colleges (Bedford and Queen's), and the technical colleges and polytechnics (e.g., Central Technical Institute) which began to appear during the latter part of this period. A comparison of teaching styles and courses offered is a fruitful way of exploring the rich development of university-level mathematics in London between 1837 and 1901. 1996 Academic Press, Inc. Cet ouvrage examine dans son ensemble l'enseignement matheÂmatique au niveau universi- taire dans diverses institutions aÁ Londres pendant la reÁgne de la Reine Victoria. Nous soulig- nons quelques matheÂmaticiens ceÂleÁbres qui participeÁrent dans ce milieu, par exemple, Au- gustus De Morgan, James Joseph Sylvester, et Karl Pearson. En plus, nous analysons les diverses grandes eÂcoles d'enseignement, y compris surtout des institutions acadeÂmiques (Uni- versity College, King's College), des eÂcoles militaires (Royal Military Academy, Woolwich et Royal Naval College, Greenwich), des eÂcoles de femmes (Bedford et Queen's), et des eÂcoles techniques et polytechniques (par exemple, Central Technical Institute) qui commencËaient aÁ apparaõÃtre durant la dernieÁre partie de cette peÂriode.
    [Show full text]
  • Hallam Tennyson, Born 10 December 1920, Is Sir Charles Tennyson's Youngest and Only Surviving Son
    Notes PART !~CHAPTER 1 Hallam Tennyson, born 10 December 1920, is Sir Charles Tennyson's youngest and only surviving son. Educated at Eton and Balliol, he spent the war in Egypt and Italy with the Friends' Ambulance Unit and later, with his wife, started a rural reconstruction programme in West Bengal for the American Quakers. Six years as a freelance writer and journalist followed; he published a book of short stories, The Wall of Dust (1948), a biography, books of history, travel and biography and a novel about India, The Dark Goddess (1958). From 1956 until 1979 he worked for the BBC, retiring as Assistant Head of Radio Drama. He broadcasts frequently and has written many plays and documentaries for radio and television. This lecture was delivered on 9 May 1979, under the auspices of the Lincoln County Council. 1. Wordsworth's Prelude (de Selincourt edition, Oxford University Press, 1933). 2. Ibid., Book II, 1, 69-71; Book VIII, 1, 404-9. 3. Across the Gaps, first broadcast 26 December 1974; text and recording in BBC Radio Archives. 4. Wordsworth's Prelude, op. cit., Book II, 1, 447. 5. Ibid., Book II, 1, 282-3. 6. Ibid., Book II, 1, 272-6. 7. Margot Asquith, Autobiography, vol. (1962 edition: Eyre & Spottiswoode), p. 137. 8. Lionel Tennyson (Macmillan, 1891; privately printed), Tennyson Research Centre, Lincoln, p. 1. 9. This tradition comes from the family of Annie Thackeray Ritchie. It is known that Annie's husband, Richmond, was in love with Eleanor during her four years of widowhood. 10. Lionel Tennyson, op.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Element in the Poetry of Matthew Arnold in Relation to the Victorian Era
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1949 The Religious Element in the Poetry of Matthew Arnold in Relation to the Victorian Era Mary Maristella Wagner Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Wagner, Mary Maristella, "The Religious Element in the Poetry of Matthew Arnold in Relation to the Victorian Era" (1949). Master's Theses. 706. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/706 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1949 Mary Maristella Wagner mE RELIGIOUS KLEMENT IN THE POETRY OF MATTHEW ARNOLD IN RELATION TO 'lliE VICTORIAN ERA By Sister M. Maristella, O.S.F. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILIJ4ENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY January 1949 VITA Sister M. Maristella, O.S.F. was born in Creighton, Nebraska, September 1, 1916. She was graduated from Saint Ludger Academy, Creighton, Nebraska, June, 1933. In September of that same year. she entered Saint Joseph Convent, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Bachelor of Philosophy degree with a major in English was conferred by Loyola University, August, 1943. From 1935 to 1944 the writer was engaged in teach­ ing in the elementary schools of Milwaukee and Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • William James and Robert Browning (Abstract)
    Philipp Erchinger Reading Experience: William James and Robert Browning (Abstract) • Full-length article in: JLT 11/2 (2017), 162–182. The topic of this essay is the concept of experience which, in the field of literary studies, is often used as if it were divided into an objective and a subjective aspect. Advocates of so-called ›empirical‹ approaches to the study of texts and minds tend to proceed from experience only to abstract impersonal (or objective) ›data‹ from it. By contrast, phenomenological and hermeneutic methods are frequently said to work through more immediately personal (or subjective) responses to, and engagements with, literary works. Thus experience, it seems, must either be read in terms of statistical diagrams and brain images, or else remain caught up in an activity of reading that, being characterised as singular and eventful, is believed to resist most attempts to convert it into such allegedly objective forms. Drawing on the radical empiricism of William James, this essay seeks to reintegrate the experience of reading and the reading of experience, both of which are ambiguously condensed in my title. The main argument of the piece therefore hinges on James’s and John Dewey’s claim that experience is »double-barrelled« (James 1977, 172), which is to say that it refers to »the entire process of phenomena«, to quote James’s own definition, »before reflective thought has analysed them into subjective and objective aspects or ingredients« (James 1978, 95). Made up of both perceptions and conceptions, experience, as James views it, is the medium through which everything must have passed before it can be named, and without (or outside of) which nothing, therefore, can be said to exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Past: Viewing History Through Fiction
    Stories Of The Past: Viewing History Through Fiction Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Green, Christopher Citation Green, C. (2020). Stories Of The Past: Viewing History Through Fiction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, UK. Publisher University of Chester Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 04/10/2021 08:03:20 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/623069 STORIES OF THE PAST: VIEWING HISTORY THROUGH FICTION Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Chester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Christopher William Green January 2020 Frontispiece: Illustration from the initial serialisation of Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D'Urbervilles.1 1 Thomas Hardy, 'Tess of the D’Urbervilles', The Graphic, August 29th, 1891. ii The material being presented for examination is my own work and has not been submitted for an award of this or another HEI except in minor particulars which are explicitly noted in the body of the thesis. Where research pertaining to the thesis was undertaken collaboratively, the nature and extent of my individual contribution has been made explicit. iii iv Abstract This thesis investigates how effective works of fiction are, through their depictions of past worlds, in providing us with a resource for the study of the history of the period in which that fiction is set. It assesses past academic literature on the role of fiction in historical understanding, and on the processes involved in the writing, reading, adapting, and interpreting of fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Bagehot
    THE WORKS AND LIFE OF WALTER BAGEHOT VOL. I. By Mrs. RUSSELL BARRINGTON. THE LIFE OF WALTER BAGEHOT. With Portraits and other Illl/stratiolls. 8vo, 12S. 6d. net. ESSAYS ON THE PURPOSE OF ART: PAST AND PRESENT CREEDS OF ENGLISH PAINTERS. 8vo, 75. 6d. net, LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO., LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY,CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS THE WORKS- AND LIFE OF WALTER BAGEHOT BDITE.D BY MRS. RUSSELL BARRINGTON THE WORKS IN NINE VOLUMES THE LIFE IN ONE VOLUME VOL. I. OF THE WORKS v LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON FOURTH AVENUE & 30THSTREET, NEW YORK BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS 1 Jl ) \ ,., PREFACE UNTIL now the only uniform edition of Walter Bagehot's writings in existence, was one published in America in 1889 by The Travellers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., "as a souvenir of itself "-to quote from its advertisement. This work was compiled and edited with exceptional care and completeness by Mr. Forrest Morgan, at considerable personal sacrifice. His ex- haustive notes have been used with advantage in subsequent issues of the separate works published in England, and also in the preparation of the present uniform edition. A debt of gratitude is clearly owing to Mr. Forrest Morgan from all those interested in the study of Walter Bagehot's writings. The American uniform edition comprised the writings previously selected by Mr. Hutton for re- publication. To these are now added the first two articles written by Bagehot which appeared in the Prospectioe Review,in 1848, namely "The Currency Monopoly" and "Principles of Political Economy"; .. The Monetary Crisis," Natz'onal Review, January, 1858; .
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall, C. / B. Lightman / R. England, Eds.: the Papers of the Metaphysical Society, 1869-1880
    MARSHALL, C. / B. LIGHTMAN / R. ENGLAND, EDS.: THE PAPERS OF THE METAPHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1869-1880. A CRITICAL EDITION, 3 VOLS. Volume I Introduction Alfred Tennyson: Poetic Prologue to the 2 June 1869 meeting, "The Higher Pantheism" 1: Richard Holt Hutton: 2 June 1869, "On Mr. H. Spencer's Theory of the Gradual Transformation of Utilitarian into Intuitive Morality by Hereditary Descent" 2: William B. Carpenter: 14 July 1869, "The Common Sense Philosophy of Causation" 3: T. H. Huxley: 17 November 1869, "The Views of Hume, Kant, and Whately upon the Logical Basis of the Doctrine of the Immortality of the Soul" 4: William George Ward: 15 December 1869, "On Memory as an Intuitive Faculty" 5: John Lubbock: 12 January 1870, "The Moral Condition of Savages" 6: Roden Noel: 9 February 1870, "What is Matter?" 7: John D. Dalgairns: 16 March 1870, "On the Theory of a Soul" 8: Henry Sidgwick: 27 April 1870, "The Verification of Beliefs" 9: James Martineau: 15 June 1870, "Is There Any 'Axiom of Causality'? " 10: Frederic Harrison: 13 July 1870, "The Relativity of Knowledge" 11: T. H. Huxley: 8 November 1870,"Has a Frog a Soul; and of What Nature is That Soul, Supposing it to Exist?" 12: Walter Bagehot: 13 December 1870, "On the Emotion of Conviction" 13: Henry Edward Manning: 11 January 1871, "What is the Relation of the Will to Thought?" 14: Alexander Grant: 8 February 1871, "On the Nature and Origin of the Moral Ideas" 15: Arthur Russell: 14 March 1871, "On the Absolute" 16: John Ruskin: 25 April 1871, "Theorem: The Range of Intellectual Conception is Proportioned to the Rank in Animated Life" 17: James Anthony Froude: 16 May 1871, "Evidence" 18: Richard Holt Hutton: 13 June 1871, "Mr.
    [Show full text]