Fogera Woreda (Case 2)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Working Paper No. 2012/44 Service Delivery and State Legitimacy: Multi-Stakeholder Processes in Water and Sanitation in Ethiopia Fenta Mandefro1, Mina Noor² and Nora Stel³ November 2012 © The authors, 2012 ¹ School of Business and Public Administration – Addis Ababa University ² Maastricht School of Management ³ Maastricht School of Management The Maastricht School of Management is a leading provider of management education with worldwide presence. Our mission is to enhance the management capacity of professionals and organizations in and for emerging economies and developing countries with the objective to substantially contribute to the development of these societies. www.msm.nl The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s). Publication does not imply endorsement by the School or its sponsors, of any of the views expressed. Further reading: - http://research.msm.nl/News/News/Latest-News/MSM-Plays-Coordination-Role-in-Peace,-Security- and.aspx - http://research.msm.nl/Research-Themes/Research-Focus-Areas/Sustainable-Development- Center/Projects/Multi-stakeholder-Processes.aspx Service Delivery and State Legitimacy: Multi-Stakeholder Processes in Water and Sanitation in Ethiopia November 2011 Research in the context of “Multi-Stakeholder Processes, Services and State Institutions” consortium – Country Report, Ethiopia Fenta Mandefro School of Business and Public Administration – Addis Ababa University With: Mina Noor and Nora Stel – Maastricht School of Management 1 Working Group Members: Maastricht School of Management Wageningen University Utrecht University Oxfam Novib Clingendael This publication is an outcome of the 2008 established „Network for Peace, Security and Development‟. The PSD Network is an initiative under the Schokland Agreements in 2007. More information on the PSD Network and other millennium agreements: www.milleniumakkoorden.nl. The views expressed and analysis put forward in this report are entirely those of the authors in their professional capacity and cannot be attributed to the Peace, Security and Development Network and / or partners involved in its working groups and/ or the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ Fout! Bladwijzer niet gedefinieerd. SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 12 SECTION 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Research questions ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Methodological choices .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Research design ................................................................................................................................................. 17 2.3.1. A case study approach .................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Selection criteria for the MSP case studies .................................................................................. 18 2.4 Data collection and analysis ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.4.1 Data sources and collection techniques ....................................................................................... 18 SECTION 3 UNDERSTANDING CONTEXTS ................................................................................................ 20 3.1 General context .......................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 The national context.................................................................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 History ......................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 The State ..................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Current socio-economic situation .......................................................................................... 22 3.2.4 Service delivery in Ethiopia .................................................................................................... 23 3.2.5 The WASH sector in Ethiopia ................................................................................................. 24 3.3 The regional context: the Amhara National Regional State (ANRS) ............................................... 26 3.3.1 The WASH sector in the ANRS .............................................................................................. 27 3.4 The context of the case study woredas .................................................................................................. 28 3.4.1 Achefer Woreda (Case 1) ......................................................................................................... 28 3.4.2 Fogera Woreda (Case 2) ............................................................................................................ 28 4.1 Input: initiation, objectives, funding and actors ................................................................................. 32 4.1.1 Initiation ..................................................................................................................................... 32 3 4.1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 33 4.1.3 MSP Actors ................................................................................................................................. 34 4.1.3 .1 Actors of the Achefer MSP (Case 1) ......................................................................................... 34 4.1.3.2 Actors of the Fogera MSP (Case 2) ......................................................................................... 36 4.2. Throughput: governance.......................................................................................................... 40 4.2.1 Governance of the Achefer MSP (Case 1) ............................................................................... 41 4.2.2 Governance of the Fogera MSP (Case 2) ................................................................................. 42 4.3 Output: Achievements and Impacts ...................................................................................... 44 4.3.1 Achievements and impacts of the Achefer MSP (Case 1) ..................................................... 44 4.3.2 Achievements and Impacts of the Fogera MSP (Case 2) ..................................................... 47 4.4. Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………………...51 SECTION 5 THE IMPACTS OF THE MSPs ON THE LEGITIMACY OF STATE INSTITUTIONS ......... 52 5.1 General legitimacy .................................................................................................................................... 52 5.2 Embedded legitimacy ............................................................................................................................... 53 5.3 Process legitimacy ..................................................................................................................................... 55 5.4 Performance legitimacy ............................................................................................................................ 57 5.5 International legitimacy ........................................................................................................................... 60 SECTION 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 62 6.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 62 6.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 64 References .................................................................................................................................................................. 66 Annexes .......................................................................................................... Fout! Bladwijzer niet gedefinieerd. Annex 1 Five forms of legitimacy and their indicators ............................................................................... 73 Annex 2 Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................... 76 Annex 3 Mapping of case studies ..................................................................................................................