DOCSLIB.ORG

A Strategy for Identifying Introduced Provenances and Translocations*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Strategy for Identifying Introduced Provenances and Translocations* A strategy for identifying introduced provenances and translocations* C. FERRIS1, A. J. DAVY2 AND G. M. HEWITT2 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/forestry/article/70/3/211/543878 by guest on 29 September 2021 1 Department of Botany, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LEI 7RH, England 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TL, England Summary Native species of oak in Britain have been of great importance in our history for their many uses, and have thus been subject to management and planting by man for centuries. Following events such as the Enclosure Acts of the late eighteenth century and the Napoleonic wars, many oaks would have been planted. Translocations and introductions of foreign genotypes were greatly encouraged by early landscape gardeners such as Capability Brown. Britain must, there- fore be a mosaic of native and non-native oaks. A major problem arises when we try to identify non-native trees. Due to their long life-cycle, oaks are of necessity both phenotypically plastic and genetically very variable and it has been virtually impossible to discriminate between native and non-native forms using traditional methods. The advent of new molecular genetic techniques however, now allows us to identify DNA markers that can distinguish between such forms. The geographic patterns for two chloroplast DNA markers will be presented. One clearly differentiates between oaks from eastern Europe versus western Europe and can be used to identify translocations of eastern European oaks into Britain and western Europe. The second identifies genotypes native to East Anglia and can be used to recognize translocations into and out of East Anglia. Introduction County Council, for example, has a biodiversity Biodiversity and its conservation have become initiatlve focusin8 on *c impact of native ver- very important issues in recent years and many *us, no"-nat've trees ™* shrubs in ancient h ed ow A ma)o roblem ln S ch studleS S non-foresters have become more aware of and L 6" ^ . / P " ' . j • r> • • I r ji the identification of native trees. Native can be interested in British forests and the provenance . - . , . c r u • • L- L n it • denned in many ways and here it is synonymous of some of the species within them. Possibilities . ' , , ' •„ c i • r ii- with the term autochthonous. A genotype wil of adaptation or native trees to local environ- . ...... 6 , , , i i- • • ji- • • i- thus be classed native if it is descended from mental conditions, in addition to nationalist . r , . , , , ,, . • • i i i u c that which first co onized the area following the tendencies, have led some groups to call for , . ,, , , 6 c • i • u- last ice-age, i.e. not affected by man. conservation of our native trees. Leicestershire 6 ' * This paper was first presented at the Institute of Chartered Foresters Discussion Meeting, Native and Non-native in British Forestry, held at the University of Warwick in 1995 and has been published in the discussion meeting proceedings. «; Innimtc: (>f Chartered Ft.rotcn, 1997 Forestry, Vol. 70. No. J, 1997 212 FORESTRY At the height of the last ice-age, about 18 000 ation for native plants over a much larger area. years ago, most of Britain was covered with ice That is, we must determine a baseline for trees (Denton and Hughes, 1981), and forests were of known provenance against which to compare restricted to refugial areas in southern Europe trees of unknown or uncertain origin. The sam- (Huntley and Birks, 1983). As the climate pling strategies are, therefore, very important. warmed and the ice melted, the trees were able We must first obtain a sample of native geno- to migrate northwards from these refugia to types and then carefully choose the type of DNA recolonize central and northern Europe. Such in which to look for variation. A map can then migratory responses of plants to long term be drawn of the native genetic variation. Any Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/forestry/article/70/3/211/543878 by guest on 29 September 2021 changes in climate may be compared to bird trees under investigation that do not conform to migration as a response to seasonal climate this pattern may be attributed to possible intro- changes (Huntley and Webb, 1989). Populations duction or translocation. in different refugia may have been isolated for To reduce time and expense, the strategy for the duration of the ice-age, some 100 000 years, finding DNA markers was initially to sequence a period in which divergence and evolution will the DNA and identify polymorphism directly; have taken place. Any differences that existed and second, using the known sequence differ- between refugial populations for a species, will ences, to determine which restriction enzymes to lead to geographic variation dependent upon the use for a fast restriction analysis of the samples. routes of migration taken (Ferris et al., 1993; The initial sequencing overcomes the lengthy 1995). Further genetic variation may be afforded problems of screening with random enzymes to by mutations fixed during migration and those look for variation, while the subsequent restric- accumulated since recolonization. tion analysis is much cheaper and faster than Genetic variation can be assessed using mor- sequencing all the samples. phological, biochemical or molecular tech- niques. However, many of our tree species are Organisms best suited to molecular studies. Oaks, for example, are phenorypically very plastic and an For the present investigation the native British individual grown under one set of conditions oak species, Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea may appear very different if grown under other (Matt.) Liebl, were chosen. These trees have conditions. Oaks are also genetically very vari- been very important to European history, and able and allozyme studies have revealed very consequently many oaks have been planted. It is high levels of diversity within populations likely, that for the most part, planting will have (Kremer et al., 1991). By contrast, chloroplast been from seed of local origin until about 250 DNA is much less variable and thus easier to years ago. Introductions of oaks for landscaping analyse. occurred during the times of Capability Brown In this paper molecular data is presented on in the second half of the eighteenth century. At two European oaks, Quercus robur L. and Q. the end of the eighteenth century the Enclosure petraea (Matt.) Liebl., and these are used as Acts resulted in the large scale planting of oak, model species in which to present a strategy for as did the depletion of timber for the obtaining molecular markers that can be used to Napoleonic wars in the early nineteenth cen- distinguish between native and non-native geno- tury. The extent to which local seed sources types. were used is not known. We therefore decided to sample trees older than 250 to 300 years, which will pre-date these times of possible intro- ductions. In order to ensure such old age, we Materials and methods sampled trees of exceedingly large girth, and also famous historical trees such as Kett's Oak Strategy in Norfolk, the Queen's Oak in Suffolk, and the In order to isolate markers that can distinguish Mitre Oak in Hereford and Worcester. In addi- between native and non-native plants for a given tion, where such trees were not available, we area, we must first establish the patterns of vari- used samples from ancient forests or wildwood INTRODUCED PROVENANCES AND TRANSLOCATIONS 213 where planting is deemed unlikely. Samples PCR amplification were also available from several sites of dubious PCR was performed using the universal chloro- status; either representing planted forest, trees plast primers C, D and F of Taberlet et al. of young age or where exact location was (1991); C+D amplify the tRNA^"1 intron and unknown, gardens of old halls and estates, and C+F amplify the intron plus an adjacent non- an arboretum in the south of France. In total the coding region. Reaction conditions are as given samples included 125 individuals from 56 sites in Ferris et al (1993). representing 15 countries from mainland Europe (Figures la, lb and 2; Tables 1 and 2); and 103 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/forestry/article/70/3/211/543878 by guest on 29 September 2021 individuals from 66 sites representing England, DNA sequencing Ireland and Wales (Figure 3, Table 3). In addi- tion, 50 trees with a girth at breast height Two sequencing methods were used and both greater than 15 feet, were sampled from a 12 X gave equally good results. Double-stranded PCR 12 km area south of Norwich. products were purified using Centricon 30 (Ami- Leaves were stored at -80°C and total con), or double-stranded PCR products were genomic DNA was extracted using the CTAB amplified using primer C biotinylated and sepa- (cetrimide) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1990) rated into single-stranded template using mag- with minor modifications by Howland (1992). netic beads (Dynal). The template was then sequenced using the dideoxy-chain termination method with a fluorescent primer and a T7 Chloroplast DNA Sequencing Kit (Pharmacia, LKB) on an Auto- It was decided to use chloroplast DNA mated Laser Fluorescence sequencing machine, (cpDNA) for two main reasons. First, the ALF (Pharmacia, LKB). extreme variability shown in oaks using Alternatively, double-stranded PCR product allozyme studies, (Kremer et al, 1991), suggests was purified using QIAquick Spin Columns that nuclear DNA may be too variable. The (Qiagen) and sequenced using PCR cycle cpDNA has a slow rate of evolution (Zurawski sequencing with dye-labelled terminators on an et al., 1984), but has been used as a source of automatic sequencing machine (ABI).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wretharn, Otherwise Little Wretham, East
    Wretharn, otherwise Little Wretham, East Wre- at his office in Cambridge ; and with the Clerk of tham, otherwise Great Wretham, Bridgeham, the Peace for the city and county of the city of otherwise Bridgham, Roudham, Larling, Snetter- Norwich, at his office in the city of Norwich ; and ton, Eccles, Wiiby, llargham, Attleborough, other- a copy of so much of the said plans, sections, and wise Attleburgli, Besthorpe, Wymondham, other- books of reference as relate to each of the parishes wise Wyndham, Hethersett, Kettartngham, Int- through which the proposed railway and branch wood, otherwise Intwoocl-cum-Keswick, Cringle- railway and works will pass, will be deposited, on ford, Keswick, Marketshall, otherwise Markshall, or before the thirty-first December next, with the Arniinghall, otherwise Arrneringhall, Trowse New- Parish Clerks of such parishes respectively, at their ton, Bexley, Thorpe, Caistor next Norsvich, Cais- respective residences. tor-cum-Markshall, otherwise Marketshall, Colney, Little Melton, Great Melton, Swardestone, Carl- Hayle Railway. ton Saint Peter, Carl ton Saint Mary, East Carlton, Mulbarton, otherwise Mulbarton-cum-Kenning- OTICE is hereby given, that application is ham, Bracon Ash, Hethel, Stanfield, Wicklewood, N intended to be made to Parliament in the "Wreningham, Ashwell Thorpe, Fundenhall, Old next session, for a Bill to alter, amend, and enlarge Buckenham, Shropham, Deopham, Larlingford, the powers and provisions of an Act, pa-ased in Great Eilinghara, Banham, Brettenham, East Har- the session of Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland Definitive Statement of Public Rights Of
    Norfolk County Council Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way District of Breckland Contains public sector information c Norfolk County Council; Available for re-use under the Open Government Licence v3: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Statement downloaded 16th January 2021; latest version available online at: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/ map-and-statement-of-public-rights-of-way-in-norfolk/definitive-statements Document compiled by Robert Whittaker; http://robert.mathmos.net/ PARISH OF ASHILL Footpath No. 1 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Houghton Common Road). Starts from fieldgate on South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs eastwards to enter Houghton Common Road opposite western end of Footpath No. 5. Bridleway No. 2 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Peddars Way). Starts from South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs south westwards and enters Peddars Way by Caudle Hill. Footpath No 5 (Houghton Common to Church Farm) Starts from Houghton Common Road opposite the eastern end of Footpath No. 1 and runs eastwards to TF 880046. From this point onwards the width of the path is 1.5 metres and runs north along the eastern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 94 metres to TF 879047 where it turns to run in an easterly direction along the southern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 275 metres to TF 882048. The path then turns south running on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 116 metres to TF 882046, then turns eastwards to the south of a drainage ditch for approximately 50 metres to TF 883047 where it turns to run southwards on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 215 metres to TF 883044 thereafter turning west along the northern side of a drainage ditch and hedge for approximately 120 metres to TF 882044.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Review of Breckland Council Proposal for a Warding Pattern
    Electoral Review of Breckland Council Proposal for a warding pattern across Breckland Council to support a Council size of 50 Councillors September 2013 Breckland Council Page 1 05/09/13 Introduction The Council was pleased to receive notification from the Local Government Boundary Commission that the Council’s submission for a council size of 50 had been adopted. The Commission has now asked for submissions proposing Warding patterns that reflect this change. Any group or individual is able to put forward suggestions on Warding patterns for the district. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England will consider all submissions and propose a warding pattern for the district. The Council’s proposals follow the process undertaken by the Working Group of six councillors set up for the purpose of in-depth research into the issues relating to council size and warding. This is a cross- party group with members spread across the district. Guidance issued by the Local Government Boundary Commission suggests that three main rules are followed when a new pattern of wards are produced. They are: Delivering electoral equality for local voters – this means ensuring that each local councillor represents roughly the same number of people so that the value of your vote is the same regardless of where you live in the local authority. Reflecting the interests and identities of local communities – this means establishing electoral arrangements which, as far as possible, maintain local ties and where boundaries are easily identifiable. Promoting effective and convenient local government – this means ensuring that the new wards or electoral divisions can be represented effectively by their elected representative(s) and that the new electoral arrangements as a whole allow the local authority to conduct is business effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 November 2019 Agenda
    ROUDHAM & LARLING PARISH COUNCIL 14 November 2019 Members of the public are invited to attend a Meeting of Roudham & Larling Parish Council to be held in the Bridgham and Roudham David O’Neale Memorial Village Hall, Chapel Lane, Bridgham, on Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 7.30 p.m. for the purpose of transacting the following business. Julian Gibson Clerk to the Council The Jays, Watton Road, Wretham, Thetford, NORFOLK IP24 1QS (01953 499980) Agenda 1. To consider accepting the reasons for any apologies for absence. 2. Declarations of interest in items on the agenda. Members are no longer required to declare personal or prejudicial interests but are to declare any new Disclosable Pecuniary Interests or Other Interests that are not currently included in the Register of Interests. Members are reminded that under the Code of Conduct they are not to participate in the whole of an agenda item in which they have an Interest. In the interests of transparency, Members may also wish to declare any other interests they have in relation to an agenda item, in support of the seven Nolan Principles, namely Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty and Leadership. 3. To consider any applications made by Members for a dispensation to allow them to participate in and vote on an agenda item in spite of a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest. 4. Public Participation Session. The Council’s Standing Orders allow members of the public to make representations, answer questions, and give evidence in respect of any item of business included in the agenda. This session should not exceed 20 minutes, and members of the public are requested to keep their comments brief.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2002
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 3221 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 Made - - - - - 18th December 2002 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) a report dated July 2002 on its review of the district of Breckland together with its recommendations: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give eVect to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002. (2) This Order shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 1st May 2003, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on 1st May 2003. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “district” means the district of Breckland; “existing”, in relation to a ward, means the ward as it exists on the date this Order is made; any reference to the map is a reference to the map marked “Map referred to in the District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002”, of which prints are available for inspection at— (a) the principal oYce of the Electoral Commission; and (b) the oYces of Breckland District Council; (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 July 2020 Agenda
    ROUDHAM & LARLING PARISH COUNCIL 9 July 2020 Members of the public are invited to attend a Meeting of Roudham & Larling Parish Council to be held via video link, on Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 7.30 p.m. for the purpose of transacting the following business. It is possible to attend this virtual meeting by computer, notepad, smart phone or similar device, or even (in audio only) using a landline. Please contact the Clerk, preferably by email at [email protected] (or failing that on 01953 499980). You will then be sent instructions and password to join the meeting. Julian Gibson Clerk to the Council The Jays, Watton Road, Wretham, Thetford, NORFOLK IP24 1QS (01953 499980) Agenda 1. To consider accepting the reasons for any apologies for absence. 2. Declarations of interest in items on the agenda. Members are no longer required to declare personal or prejudicial interests but are to declare any new Disclosable Pecuniary Interests or Other Interests that are not currently included in the Register of Interests. Members are reminded that under the Code of Conduct they are not to participate in the whole of an agenda item in which they have an Interest. In the interests of transparency, Members may also wish to declare any other interests they have in relation to an agenda item, in support of the seven Nolan Principles, namely Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty and Leadership. 3. To consider any applications made by Members for a dispensation to allow them to participate in and vote on an agenda item in spite of a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2015, East of England
    East of England Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents Heritage at Risk III North Norfolk 46 Norwich 51 South Norfolk 53 The Register VII Peterborough, City of (UA) 57 Content and criteria VII Southend-on-Sea (UA) 60 Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Suffolk 61 Reducing the risks XI Babergh 61 Key statistics XIV Forest Heath 62 Publications and guidance XV Ipswich 63 Mid Suffolk 63 Key to the entries XVII St Edmundsbury 65 Entries on the Register by local planning XIX Suffolk Coastal 68 authority Waveney 72 Bedford (UA) 1 Thurrock (UA) 72 Cambridgeshire 2 Cambridge 2 East Cambridgeshire 3 Fenland 5 Huntingdonshire 7 South Cambridgeshire 9 Central Bedfordshire (UA) 13 Essex 15 Braintree 15 Brentwood 16 Chelmsford 17 Colchester 17 Epping Forest 19 Harlow 21 Maldon 21 Tendring 22 Uttlesford 25 Hertfordshire 26 Broxbourne 26 Dacorum 27 East Hertfordshire 27 North Hertfordshire 28 St Albans 30 Three Rivers 31 Watford 31 Welwyn Hatfield 32 Luton (UA) 32 Norfolk 32 Breckland 32 Broadland 38 Great Yarmouth 40 King's Lynn and West Norfolk 42 Norfolk Broads (NP) 46 II East of England Summary 2015 or the first time, we’ve compared all sites on the Heritage at Risk Register – from houses to hillforts – to help us better understand which types of site are most F commonly at risk. There are things that make each region special and, once lost, will mean a sense of our region’s character is lost too. Comparing the East of England to the national Register shows that 40.7% of all mills and 15.5% of all enclosures are in our region.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkmog News 44.Pub
    FolkMog News Issue No. 44 – May 2010 MSCC Eastern Counties (FolkMog) Centre Secretary Alan Biddlecombe, 1 Barley Lands, Aldeburgh, Suffolk IP15 5LW Tel: 01728 453302 E-mail: [email protected] FolkMog News Roger Tatton, 67 School Road, Drayton, Norwich NR8 6EQ Tel: 01603 260191 E-mail: [email protected] Events Co-ordinator Diana Biddlecombe, 1 Barley Lands, Aldeburgh, Suffolk IP15 5LW Tel: 01728 453302 E-mail: [email protected] Website http://www.folkmog.org.uk As many of you will know, Ian Young had Lots of members attended the two a mishap in their distinctive blue and yellow successful skid-pan meetings in January & Roadster 4-seater at the end of last year and the February. Then later in February we met at the car, Bumble, is no more. The good news is that Swan, Hoxne for lunch. This was such a popular Bumble II is on the way and should be delivered event that, for the first time ever, we this summer, so Ian & Elizabeth won’t be unfortunately had to turn some people away as Mogless for much longer. In anticipation & we had reached the pub’s capacity of thirty five. celebration this issue has a yellow & blue car on The weather wasn’t too kind though, with snow the header. and rain showers, so not many Morgans turned out. Recent Events We have been quite busy over the past few months with many Morgan events to enjoy. Morgans parked outside the Lord Nelson at Burnham Thorpe in March The weather was better for the next lunchtime meeting at The Lord Nelson at FolkMog members enjoying lunch at the Swan, Burnham Thorpe, birthplace of Horatio Nelson Hoxne in February (the village, not the pub).
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK RESEARCH PARISH RECORDS CENSUS SEARCHES CERTIFICATES £5 Per Hour Send SAE Or IRC for Details W
    Norfolk Family History Society A private company limited by guarantee Registered in England - Company No. 3194731 Registered as a Charity - Registration No. 1055410 Registered Office address: Kirby Hall, 70 St. Giles Street, Norwich, NR2 1LS Headquarters and Library Kirby Hall, 70 St. Giles Street, Norwich NR2 1LS Telephone No. (01603) 763718 NFHS Web pages: http://www.norfolkfhs.org.uk For a full list of contacts with email addresses please see page 35 Board of Trustees Mike Dack NORS Admin Paul Harman Transcripts Organiser Margaret Murgatroyd Parish Registers/Ancestor Edmund Perry Company Secretary Carol Reeve Volunteer Co-ordinator Jean Stangroom Chair and Membership Sectretary Carole Taylor Treasurer Editorial Team Robin Whitmore Editor Mary Mitchell Proof Reader Gillian James Margaret Murgatroyd Linda Hurley Current Rates for Membership Single Joint Single Joint Single Joint 10 Year 10 Year Life Life UK £10 £15 £75 £112 £165 £250 Overseas Airmail £12 £18 £90 £135 £200 £300 ISBN 0141 4505 © Copyright 2012 NFHS and Contributors The Norfolk Ancestor Journal of the NFHS 3 March 2013 CONTENTS The Norfolk Ancestor March 2013 Page Diary of Events 5 Group Meeting Venues 5 Kirby Hall Open Day 6 Front Cover 6 Notices 7 Guidelines 8 From the Editor Robin Whitmore 9 Book Reviews 10-11 Useful Websites 11 NFHS Website Mike Dack 12 NORS Mike Dack 13 Schooldays Edmund Perry 13 Charles Dickens in Norwich Edmund Perry 14-15 Group Reports 16-18 Pandora’s Box Anne Young 19 Are You Related to President Lincoln? 20 Family Tree Appeal and Pedigrees Pam
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Records Committee
    Norfolk Records Committee Date: Friday, 02 November 2018 Time: 10:30 Venue: Green Room, Archive Centre, County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 2DH Persons attending the meeting are requested to turn off mobile phones. Membership Cllr D Bradford Norwich City Council Cllr J Brociek-Coulton Norwich City Council Cllr D Buck Substitute: Cllr S Dunn Broadland District Council Cllr S Button Norwich City Council Cllr A Claussen-Reynolds North Norfolk District Council Cllr M Coleman Great Yarmouth Borough Council Cllr P Duigan (Vice-Chairman) Norfolk County Council Substitute: Cllr B Iles Cllr R Hanton Norfolk County Council Cllr C J Kemp (Chairman) Substitute: Cllr M Gray South Norfolk District Council Cllr R Kybird Breckland District Council Cllr E A Nockolds King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council Cllr D Rowntree Substitute: Cllr M Sands Norfolk County Council Non-Voting Members Mr M R Begley Co-opted Member Mr R Jewson Custos Rotulorum Dr G A Metters Representative of the Norfolk Record Society Dr V Morgan Observer Prof. C Rawcliffe Co-Opted Member Revd. C Read Representative of the Bishop of Norwich Mr A Steynor Co-opted Member For further details and general enquiries about this Agenda please contact the Committee Officer: Hollie Adams on 01603 223029 or email [email protected] 1 Under the Council’s protocol on the use of media equipment at meetings held in public, this meeting may be filmed, recorded or photographed. Anyone who wishes to do so must inform the Chairman and ensure that it is done in a manner clearly visible to anyone present.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONSIDERING TUSK and BONE: an ANALYSIS of the FORMS, FUNCTIONS and PERCEPTIONS of ANGLO-SAXON IVORIES, C.500-1066 Three Volumes, Vol
    RECONSIDERING TUSK AND BONE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FORMS, FUNCTIONS AND PERCEPTIONS OF ANGLO-SAXON IVORIES, c.500-1066 Three Volumes, Vol. I Lyndsey Smith, BA MA PhD University of York History of Art September 2015 Abstract It is the purpose of this thesis to reconsider the ivories of early medieval England with an in-depth analysis drawing on various disciplinary approaches. The last extensive published scholarly work on these ivories was that produced over forty years ago by John Beckwith (Ivory Carvings in Early Medieval England, 1972). Since then there has been little in the way of scholarly investigation of these objects beyond occasional studies of individual ivories in the form of articles or as entries in catalogues of museum collections – or even more rarely, as a passing mention within monographs on Anglo-Saxon art in general. While Beckwith’s publication was, by comparison, comprehensive in its coverage, there were, nevertheless, some ivories that were not included – in some cases because they have come to light since 1972. Generally speaking, however, the scholarly trend has been to consider the ivories of Anglo-Saxon England only in relation to continental workshops (namely, Carolingian, Merovingian or Italian centres of production), and most discussions of them has been from a formalist art historical point of view, concentrating on style rather than materiality or iconography. Such approaches fail to acknowledge the full potential of the ivories. To remedy this situation, this thesis will situate the publication and collection of Anglo-Saxon ivories between 1850-2015 as a means of explaining the nature of the scholarship as it exists today.
    [Show full text]