View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by TopSCHOLAR Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Philosophy & Religion Faculty Publications Philosophy & Religion 2015 The rC eation of Daoism Paul Fischer Western Kentucky University,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/phil_rel_fac_pub Part of the Chinese Studies Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Paul Fisher, “The rC eation of Daoism,” Journal of Daoist Studies 8 (2015): 1-23. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy & Religion Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. The Creation of Daoism PAUL FISCHER Abstract This paper examines the creation of Daoism in its earliest, pre-Eastern Han peri- od. After an examination of the critical terms “scholar/master” (zi 子) and “au- thor/school” (jia 家), I argue that, given the paucity of evidence, Sima Tan and Liu Xin should be credited with creating this tradition. The body of this article considers the definitions of Daoism given by these two scholars and all of the extant texts that Liu Xin classified as “Daoist.” Based on these texts, I then sug- gest an amended definition of Daoism. In the conclusion, I address the recent claim that the daojia 道家/daojiao 道教 dichotomy is false, speculating that disa- greement over this claim arises from context in which Daoism is considered: among the other pre-Qin “schools of thought” or among other world religions.