Macroinvertebrates and Excessive Fine Sediment Conditions in Oregon Coastal Streams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Macroinvertebrates and Excessive Fine Sediment Conditions in Oregon Coastal Streams Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 6-6-2014 Macroinvertebrates and Excessive Fine Sediment Conditions in Oregon Coastal Streams Patrick Michael Edwards Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Edwards, Patrick Michael, "Macroinvertebrates and Excessive Fine Sediment Conditions in Oregon Coastal Streams" (2014). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1831. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1830 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Macroinvertebrates and Excessive Fine Sediment Conditions in Oregon Coastal Streams by Patrick Michael Edwards A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences and Resources Dissertation Committee: Yangdong Pan, Chair Ian Waite Heejun Chang Sherri Johnson Alan Yeakley Portland State University 2014 i Abstract The Pacific Coastal ecoregion contains large tracts of economically important forestlands that also serve as critical stream habitat for endangered Salmonids. Excessive fine sediment deposition in streams of this region is a major environmental concern in the region but difficult to measure directly. The use of stream invertebrates to monitor fine sediment conditions in streams requires careful consideration of several important factors that complicate their use as bioindicators including high spatial and temporal variability and covariance with other environmental variables. To evaluate the use of stream invertebrates as bioindicators of excessive fine sediment, three hypotheses were tested. The first hypothesis was that invertebrates would be related to broad-scale climate variables (Chapter 2). The second hypothesis was that functional aspects of the invertebrate community would serve as useful indicators of excessive fine sediment condition. (Chapter 3). The third hypothesis was that invertebrates in streams with naturally high levels of sediment would be tolerant to fine sediment (<2 mm, Chapter 4). Hypotheses were tested using a temporal data set at two streams in western Oregon, spatial data from 214 sites across the Oregon Coast Range, and in-situ experiment conducted in streams with erosive or resistant geologies. In the temporal study, both invertebrate density and functional traits were positively related to El Niño strength (R2 range = 0.22-0.36, ρ range = 0.008-0.04) and air temperature (R2 range = 0.32-0.49, ρ range = 0.002-0.01). The spatial study identified several environmental and hydrological factors that exhibited strong negative controls on both fine sediment (Mantel r range 0.14-0.25, ρ range = 0.001-0.01) and invertebrate i Scrapers (R2 range = 0.11-0.14, ρ range = 0.001-0.04). The result of the experimental study provide evidence that invertebrates in streams with erosive geologies exhibit tolerance to sediment addition when compared to invertebrates in resistant geologies (mean loss=15%, ρ <0.01) and that invertebrate grazing traits were most strongly associated with fine sediment dosing frequency (ρ <0.05). The findings of this research demonstrate the role of geology in shaping invertebrate communities and their functional response to fine sediment addition and identify functional indicators that may be useful in different geologic settings. For environmental managers in the Pacific Coastal ecoregion, these findings are of potential value in assisting with the identification of biologically-relevant changes in stream fine sediment conditions and support efforts to balance economic needs in the region while protecting critical Salmonid habitat. ii Acknowledgements Many thanks to my advisor, Dr. Yangdong Pan. Dr. Pan provided thoughtful advice and support through every step of my degree. I would also like to thank my committee members: Dr. Heejun Chang, Dr. Sherri Johnson, Dr. Ian Waite and Dr. Alan Yeakley, all of whom provided many insightful suggestions and advice about my research. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality provided me the data for Chapter 3 and Shannon Hubler was always happy to answer questions and give helpful advice about the data. I would also like to thank the graduate students of Dr. Pan’s lab. Without their help, I could not have finished this work. I’m also grateful for the financial support I have received from Portland State University and the Cascades to Coast GK-12 Program. Data and facilities were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 0823380), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. And finally, I’d like to thank my family and friends for their encouragement and support. iii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................iii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ..................................................................................................................viii Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................1 SEDIMENT POLLUTION OF SMALL STREAMS IN THE UNITED STATES ...........1 THE OREGON COAST RANGE STUDY AREA ............................................................3 FINE SEDIMENT DYNAMICS IN OREGON COAST RANGE STREAMS .................3 ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................4 ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC CONTROLS OF INVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGE IN STREAMS...........................................................................................................................4 HIERARCHICAL CONTROLS OF INVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGE.........................6 BIOME LEVEL ..................................................................................................................6 BASIN LEVEL ...................................................................................................................8 REACH LEVEL ...............................................................................................................10 PATCH LEVEL ................................................................................................................13 LITERATURE SYNTHESIS AND GAP ANALYSIS ....................................................15 IMPACT OF EXCESSIVE FINE SEDIMENT ON INVERTEBRATE...........................15 MECHANISMS OF FINE SEDIMENT IMPACTS ON INVERTEBRATES AT MULTIPLE SCALES .......................................................................................................16 INVERTEBRATE MOUTHPARTS AS INDICATORS OF EXCESSIVE FINE SEDIMENT IN STREAMS ..............................................................................................19 GAP IN THE LITERATURE ...........................................................................................22 Chapter 2: Stream Invertebrate and Climate Relationships in the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion of Oregon .........................................................................................................31 ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................31 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................32 METHODS .......................................................................................................................35 iv RESULTS .........................................................................................................................41 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................44 Chapter 3: Invertebrate Indicators of Excessive Fine Sediment in Streams of the Oregon Coast Range ......................................................................................................................67 ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................67 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................68 METHODS .......................................................................................................................72 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................78 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................84 Chapter 4: An in-situ experiment to test the effect of natural sediment supply on stream invertebrate response to fine sediment addition in naturally colonized mesocosms ......103 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................103
Recommended publications
  • Individual Permit National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Phase I Individual Permit
    a Individual Permit National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Phase I Individual Permit Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Stormwater Program 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Issued pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 468B.050 and Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act Issued to: City of Portland Permit Number: 101314 Port of Portland File Number: 108015 Major Receiving Water Bodies: Basins Willamette River, Columbia River Sub-basins Lower Willamette River, Columbia Slough, Tualatin River Streams Columbia River, Columbia Slough, Fanno Creek, Balch Creek, Johnson Creek, and Tryon Creek Wasteload/Load Allocations (if any): A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) that includes wasteload allocations for urban stormwater has been established for the Willamette River Basin, Tualatin River Subbasin, and the Columbia Slough. Waste Load Allocations are addressed in Schedule D of this permit. Sources Covered By This Permit This permit covers all existing and new discharges of stormwater from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) within the City of Portland Urban Services Boundary, in accordance with the requirements, limitations and conditions set forth. ___________________________________________ ________________________________ Christine Svetkovich Issuance Date: Water Quality Manager ________________________________ Effective Date: MS4 Phase I Individual Permit Portland Group Effective: Expiration: PERMITTED ACTIVITIES Until this permit expires, is modified or revoked, each co-permittee is authorized to discharge municipal stormwater to surface waters of the state only in conformance with the requirements, limitations and conditions set forth in the following schedules. Where conflict exists between specific conditions (found in Schedules A-D) and general conditions (Schedule F), the specific conditions supersede the general conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fanno Creek and Tributaries Conservation Plan
    Fanno Creek and Tributaries Conservation Plan Volume One: Inventory, Analysis, and Regulations for the Protection and Restoration ofFish and Wildlife Habitats, Natural Areas, Water Bodies, and Wetlands and Volume Four: Revised Zoning Maps Final Plan As Adopted bythe CityCouncil City of Portland, Oregon Bureau of Planning Adopted by Ordinance Number 167293, as Amended, onJanuary 19, 1994 Effective January 19, 1994 If you need a large-print copy of this report, Please call 823-7700 (or TDD 823-6868). Portland City Council Vera Katz, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Charlie Hales, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Richard Cooley, President Richard Michaelson, Vice President Joan Brown-Klein Bruce Fong Margaret Kirkpatrick. Vivian Parker Paul Schuback. Douglas Van Dyk Fanno Creek and Tributaries Conservation Plan Volume One: Inventory, Analysis, and Regulations for the Protection and Restoration of Fish and Wildlife Habitats, Natural Areas, Water Bodies, and Wetlands Bureau of Planning Charlie Hales, Commissioner-In-Charge David Knowles, Interim Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief of Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Manager AI Burns, City Planner Project Jlssistance Charles Beasley, Project Research Jessica Richman, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Peter Hurley, Planning Jlssistant Robert Goldie, Information System Analyst Linda Torgeson, Graphic lliustrator Geoff Sauncy, Graphic lllustrator January 19,1994 Substitute Ordinance No. 16 7 293 As Amended ·Protect and Conserve Natural Resources within the Fanno Creek Watershed. (Ordinance: amend Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Maps, and Title 33, Planning and Zonin~) The City of Portland Ordains: Section 1. The Council fmds: General Findings 1. The Fauno Creek Watershed contains many significant natural resources that are worthy of protection or conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative Mapping the Trail to a Healthy and Sustainable Forest Park
    Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative Mapping the trail to a healthy and sustainable Forest Park. Prepared by: THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY IN COLLABORATION WITH THE FOREST PARK ALLIANCE. Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative | 1 Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative Prepared by THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY IN COLLABORATION WITH THE FOREST PARK ALLIANCE November 2013 Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative | 2 SUGGESTED CITATION Forest Park Conservancy and Forest Park Alliance. 2013. Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative. R. Myers, principal author. www.forestparkconservancy.org FOREST PARK ALLIANCE MEMBERS Audubon Society of Portland City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Columbia Land Trust Forest Park Conservancy Forest Park Neighborhood Association Friends of Trees Linnton Neighborhood Association Metro Regional Government Portland Parks & Recreation The Intertwine Alliance West Multnomah Soil & Water Conservation District Greater Forest Park Conservation Initiative | 3 Preface In 2008 the Friends of Forest Park became the Forest Park Conservancy. This transition was more than just a change of name. It indicated a maturing of the organization and an intention to be a stronger and more capable part- ner to the park’s owner and operator, Portland Parks & Recreation. It sig- naled a readiness for greater conservation leadership. The new identity brought with it new questions. Where do we stand in our efforts to restore and protect Forest Park? What is our ultimate vision for the park’s ecological health? Are we on course to achieve that vision and if not, how should we respond? How do we best engage residents of the Portland region with the park’s future? What is our responsibility not just to the park but to the greater landscape with which the park is so deeply intertwined? If the Forest Park Conservancy was to live up to its new name, it needed to find its footing among these fundamental questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: the City's Natural Environment
    APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment The City’s Environmental Setting General Characteristics Portland is situated at 20 feet above sea level, near the confluence of the Columbia and Willamette rivers, about 65 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. It lies midway between the lower Coast Range to the west and the high Cascades Range to the east, each about 30 miles distant. Portland’s varied topography includes steep hills, isolated volcanic cones, low rolling hills and extensive flat areas. The area is composed primarily of alluvial deposits and Columbia River basalts. Much of the city is located in the Willamette Valley Plains ecoregion, although steeper portions of the Tualatin Hills on the west side are characteristic of Willamette Valley Hills and Coastal Mountains ecoregions (Clarke and others 1991). Portland has a mild marine climate that is heavily influenced by the mountain ranges east and west of the city. The Coast Range protects the Portland area from Pacific storms, while the Cascades prevent colder continental air masses from invading western Oregon. In winter, the average temperature is 40°F and the average minimum temperature is 34°F. In summer the average temperature is 65°F with an average daily maximum of 74 to 78°F (Rockey 2002). The Cascades also lift moisture-laden westerly winds from the Pacific, driving local rainfall patterns. Average annual rainfall in the Portland area is approximately 37 inches. Nearly 90 percent of the annual rainfall occurs from October through May. Only 9 percent of the annual rainfall occurs between June and September, with 3 percent in July and August.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Portland Harbor Programmatic EIS and Restoration Plan
    Final Portland Harbor Programmatic EIS and Restoration Plan Volume 1 of 2 Prepared by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration May 2017 With support from Final Portland Harbor Programmatic EIS and Restoration Plan May 24, 2017 Prepared by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Restoration Center 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97232 With support from Parametrix 700 NE Multnomah, Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232-4110 T. 503.233.2400 T. 360.694.5020 F. 503.233.4825 www.parametrix.com CITATION NOAA. May 2017. Final Portland Harbor Programmatic EIS and Restoration Plan. Portland, Oregon. May 2017 │ 273-3975-023 Final Portland Harbor Programmatic EIS and Restoration Plan National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration PORTLAND HARBOR NRDA PROGRAMMATIC EIS AND RESTORATION PLAN Final Draft Project Location: Portland Harbor NRDA Study Area (Willamette River, River Mile 0.8 to River Mile 12.3) and broader focus area (see Figure 1-1) Lead Federal Agency: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Lead Administrative Trustee: NOAA Cooperating Agencies and Tribes: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (DOI, USFWS) State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon Nez Perce Tribe Contact Person: Megan Callahan Grant, NOAA NOAA Restoration Center 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd. #1100 Portland, OR 97232 Email: [email protected] Abstract: Part I of this Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Restoration Plan evaluates the potential environmental impacts of three restoration planning alternatives and selects an integrated habitat restoration approach as the preferred alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Balch Creek Watershed Protection Plan
    BALCH CREEK WATERSHED PROTECTION PLAN Inventory, Analysis, and Regulations for Fish and Wildlife Habitats, Natural Areas, Open Space, Water Bodies, and Wetlands Bureau of Planning City of Portland Adopted by Ord. No. 163770 Effective, Febmaxy 8, 1991 Portland CityCouncil E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland PlanningCommission Martha Peck Andrews, President Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Estill Deitz Barbara M. Karmel Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker BalchCreekTask Force Molly O'Reilly, First Officer, Forest Park Neighborhood Association Chair Colin Macdonald, Second Officer, Royal Highlands Resident Jim Thayer, Third Officer, Friends of Forest Park Chair Jim Bartels, Balch Creek Watershed Resident Richard Caplan, Nob Hill Business Resident Larry Espey, Oregon Parks Foundation Chair Joanne Garnett, Multnomah County Planner Charles Hales, Homebuilders Association of Metropolitan Portland Jay Massey, Oregon Department ofFish and Wildlife District Biologist Scott Meyer, Portland Audubon Society Board Member Chris Wrench, Northwest District Association Balch Creek Watershed Protection Plan fuventory, Analysis, andRegulationsfor FishandWildlife Habitats, NaturalAreas, OpenSpace,Water Bodies, andWetlands BureauofPlanning Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Acting Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief of Long Range Planning and Urban Design ProjectPlanner AI Burns, City Planner ProjectAssistance
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Neighborhoods Restoration and Community Stewardship Grants Pre-Application Data from the 2014 Cycle
    Nature in Neighborhoods Restoration and Community Stewardship Grants Pre-application data from the 2014 cycle AMOUNT ORGANIZATION NAME PROGRAM TITLE PROGRAM SUMMARY REQUESTED PARTNERSHIPS POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIPS LOCATION Adelante Mujeres, Tualatin Adelante Conservación II Through a partnership with Adelante Mujeres, Tualatin Riverkeepers and $25,000 Clean Water Services Forest Grove; Riverkeepers and Clean Water Clean Water Services, we seek to expand and enhance our current project, Cornelius; Services (Co-applicants) Adelante Conservación, by incorporating a “peer-to-peer train the trainer” Hillsboro model to further engage with Adelante Mujeres’ participants. We aim to increase awareness amongst the Latino population of the need for, and benefits of, protecting and managing natural areas. In doing so, we seek to build the next generation of conservation leaders by providing access to learning for those individuals who express interest in exploring the field of conservation, to gain the skills to share their learning with others. Andrew Case Two adjacent land owners seek to remove invasive species and restore $9,000 Neighboring land owner; Bureau of Milwaukie native riparian areas. A stretch of bank armoring will be removed in order Environmental Services Engineer restore bank habitat for flora and fauna. Audubon Society of Portland and Backyard Habitat Backyard Habitat Certification Program is an initiative within the Portland $25,000 City of Gresham; Friends of Nadaka Outer East Columbia Land Trust Certification Program: metropolitan area that engenders community stewardship and improves Nature Park; Friends of Tryon Creek; East Multnomah (CoApplicants) Portland Metropolitan habitat in developed areas. Participants act as partners in conservation by / West Multnomah Soil and Water County; Expansion integrating native plants, removing invasive plants, reducing pesticides, Conservation Districts; City of Lake Clackamas stewarding wildlife and managing stormwater in their yards.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Hydrologic Monitoring of a Landslide- Prone Hillslope in Portland’S West Hills, Oregon, 2006–2017
    Prepared in cooperation with Portland State University Results of Hydrologic Monitoring of a Landslide- Prone Hillslope in Portland’s West Hills, Oregon, 2006–2017 Data Series 1050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The photograph shows terrain and vegetation in the vicinity of the monitoring site in Portland's West Hills, Oregon. The camera was facing northeast and located about 50-meters southeast of the hydrologic monitoring site. The solar panel and a rain gage can be seen in the foreground. The treeless area is a scar from a recent landslide; the zone of depression was filled with gravel to mitigate the disturbed topography. Results of Hydrologic Monitoring of a Landslide-Prone Hillslope in Portland’s West Hills, Oregon, 2006–2017 By Joel B. Smith, Jonathan W. Godt, Rex L. Baum, Jeffrey A. Coe, William L. Ellis, Eric S. Jones, and Scott F. Burns Prepared in cooperation with Portland State University Data Series 1050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Water Temperature Data Collection in the Lower Willamette River, Oregon, in Support of Cold-Water Refuge Monitoring
    2016-2017 Water Temperature Data Collection in the Lower Willamette River, Oregon, in Support of Cold-Water Refuge Monitoring Overview Contact In the summers of 2016 and 2017, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collected water Krista Jones temperature data in tributaries and other off-channel features of the lower Willamette Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey River. Water temperature measurements were also collected at a variety of locations and 2130 SW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97201 varying depths within the mainstem river. These data were collected to identify locations [email protected] of potential cold-water refuges and monitor daily and seasonal patterns in water 503-251-3476 temperature. These measurements serve other uses such as monitoring for Willamette River water-temperature TMDL requirements of local municipalities and understanding water quality diversity in the reach. These data collection efforts were supported by Meyer Memorial Trust, the City of Lake Oswego, and the City of Wilsonville. Datasets Collected by the USGS 1) Continuous water-temperature measurements of tributaries entering the lower Willamette River at 12 sites between Willamette Falls and the Columbia River in 2016 and 10 sites within the Wilsonville and Lake Oswego management areas in 2017. 2) Discrete point measurements of temperature in tributaries, at tributary confluences, and within the mainstem Willamette River in summers 2016 and 2017; some also include measurements of dissolved oxygen and/or specific conductance. Abernathy Creek at Oregon City, summer
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program Executive Summary–First Year Data 1
    BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • CITY OF PORTLAND YEAR Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program Executive Summary–First Year Data 1 Nick Fish, Commissioner Michael Jordan, Director OCTOBER 2015 EXECUTIVE Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program SUMMARY FIRST YEAR DATA (FY 2010-2011) PAWMAP gathers and The Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program analyzes data from these Portland-area watersheds: (PAWMAP) redesigned the city’s watershed monitoring to more • Columbia Slough directly support the 2005 Portland Watershed Management Plan. • Fanno Creek The program: • Johnson Creek • Coordinates and integrates watershed monitoring across all watersheds, to make results comparable. • Tryon Creek • Collects all watershed measures at the same locations to support more • Tualatin River powerful analysis of patterns in the data. • Willamette River • Uses a strong statistical design that increases the accuracy and efficiency of tributaries only data collection. • Adopts an approach designed by national monitoring experts, providing information that is directly comparable to state and federal monitoring efforts. • Supports regulatory compliance requirements under the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act. Portland watersheds are very diverse, including steep Forest Park streams, moderate-gradient streams like Tryon and Johnson creeks, and low-gradient waterbodies like the Columbia Slough and Columbia and Willamette Rivers. Stream sizes range from small seasonal streams to the fourth largest river in the country. Land cover ranges from the heavily forested Forest Park and Tryon Creek State Natural Area to the highly industrialized Portland Harbor. PAWMAP samples the habitat, water quality and biological communities of Portland’s watersheds1. This document summarizes the results of the first year data sampling in each watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • March/April 2019
    Still time to register for Spring AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND Break and Summer Camps! Page 7 MARCH/APRIL 2019 Black-throated Volume 83 Numbers 3&4 Warbler Gray Warbler Time for Modern Nesting Birds and Spring Optics Board Elections and Flood Management Native Plants Fair Articles of Incorporation Page 4 Page 5 Page 9 Page 10 From the Executive Director: BIRDATHON A Historic Gift to 2019 Counting Birds Expand Our Sanctuary Because Birds Count! Needs Your Support Registration begins March 15 by Nick Hardigg oin the biggest Birdathon ur 150-acre Portland wildlife sanctuary is the this side of the Mississippi— cumulative result of 90 years of private and public you’ll explore our region’s conservation campaigns, each one adding to the J O birding hotspots during strength and integrity of wild lands protected previously. A Sanctuaries Manager Esther Forbyn celebrates the latest addition. migration, learn from expert beautiful network of more than four miles of nature trails, now and raise funds later—protecting valuable natural land birders, AND help raise money meandering through young and old-growth forests, creeks, that connects with Forest Park—or eventually see 30 town- to protect birds and habitat and sword ferns, our Sanctuary’s founding dates back houses rise in the quietest reaches of our Sanctuary. Our across Oregon! Last year, you to the 1920s when our board envisioned protecting and costs would be $500,000 to pay off the owner’s mortgage, helped us raise over $195,000 and we hope you’ll join restoring a Portland sanctuary for birds and other wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Distribution of Fish in City of Portland Streams
    ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FISH IN CITY OF PORTLAND STREAMS FINAL REPORT 2001-03 VOLUME 2 – SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS Prepared for: City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Endangered Species Act Program 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 1000 Portland, Oregon 97204 Prepared by: Eric S. Tinus James A. Koloszar David L. Ward Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 17330 S.E. Evelyn Street Clackamas, OR 97015 December 2003 CONTENTS PAGE OVERVIEW ii FIGURE 1 – Watersheds surveyed 1 FIGURE 2 - Miller Creek 2 FIGURE 3 – Balch Creek 3 FIGURE 4 – Stephens Creek 4 FIGURE 5 – Tryon Creek 5 FIGURE 6 – Johnson Creek, reaches 2-4 6 FIGURE 7 – Johnson Creek, reaches 6-8 7 FIGURE 8 – Johnson Creek, reaches 10-12 8 FIGURE 9 – Johnson Creek, reaches 14-16 9 FIGURE 10 – Crystal Springs Creek 10 FIGURE 11 – Kelley Creek 11 i OVERVIEW This volume contains GIS-based maps of streams surveyed, which indicate where we found salmonids and lampreys during surveys from 2001 through 2003. Salmonids include cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki, rainbow/steelhead O. mykiss, Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha, and coho salmon O. kisutch. Each is indicated separately. Lampreys include Pacific lamprey Lampetra tridentata and western brook lamprey L. richardsoni. Because of the difficulty in identifying lamprey ammocoetes to species in the field, maps indicate the distribution of both species together. Information is limited to these species because (1) they are native species sensitive to habitat perturbations, (2) they are of cultural, commercial, or recreational importance to humans, and (3) they are either listed, candidates to be listed, or petitioned to be listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]