ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
“A TRUE SMILE ON A FARMER’S FACE IS THE KEY FOR THE NATION’S SUCCESS”
Efforts have been made to prepare this project report to cater the needs of every single beneficiary. The success of any project depends largely on the encouragement and guidelines of many others. I take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the people who have been instrumental in the successful completion of this project report.
I would like to show my greatest appreciation to the Director (Watershed) Dr. Arushi Malik for her fruitful guidance which is for sure going to lead to a path of a successful project. A dedicating working of honourable Collector Ajmer, Sh. Vaibhav Galria is always a source of inspiration for all the involved functionaries. I feel motivated and encouraged every time I attend his meeting. Without his encouragement and guidance, this project would not have materialized. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to CEO Jila Parishad Sh. C R Meena & Project Manager (IWMP) , Sh. Kan Singh Solanki for providing all the support and assistance in preparing a good quality Project Report. Although the time for preparation of this report is cut short, but no short cuts have been taken to complete the process in this short span of time. Rigorous and dedicated working of our Watershed Development Team have made special emphasis in taking out the actual field datas and documenting it properly. The guidance and support received from all the Officials of the line departments, committee members and public representatives like ZP members, PS members, Sarpanchs, Up – Sarpanchs and ward members have given their ample contribution in giving the final shape to this DPR.
Last but not the least, I would like to express my sincere thanks to Mr. Sandeep Pande, Jr. Engineer, who as a key pillar, with all his diligent effort, have made this mammoth task happen, in such a short span of time.
Rajeev Vallabh Mishra Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti ( Silora) Kishangarh
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN
(WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT & SOIL CONSERVATION)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT : IWMP XIII (SURSURA - D) EFFECTIVE AREA : 5638 HACTARE COST / HA : 15000/- COST OF PROJECT : 845.70 LACS BLOCK : SILORA DISTRICT : AJMER
PIA – ASSISTANT ENGINEER PROJECT MANAGER, WCDC W.D.&S.C., P.S. – SILORA W.D.&S.C., DISTRICT – Ajmer
Details of Project
1. Name of Project :- SURSURA – D ( IWMP – 13 ) 2. Sanction No. & date of Project :- 4800 / 5087 & 05-08-2011 3. Macro & Micro No’s :- 8/1, 8/ 2b, 8/3, 8 /4b, 8/6, 8 / 8b, 8 / 9b,8 / 11 b, 8 /12, 8 / 13,8 / 15 , 8 / 16, 8 / 17, 8 / 18,9 / 1, 9 / 2, 9 / 3, 9 / 4, 97 /97
4. Deviation from Project Sanctioned:
Items As per Project Sanctioned As proposed in DPR
Project Area 5638 ha 5638 ha
Macro/Micro 8 / 8/1, 8/ 2b, 8/3, 8 /4b, 8/6, 8 / 8b, 8 / 1,2b,3,4b,6,7,8b,9b,11b,12b,13b,15b,16b, No 9b,8 / 11 b, 8 /12, 8 / 13,8 / 15 , 8 / 17,18 16, 8 / 17, 8 / 18,9 / 1, 9 / 2, 9 / 3, 9 / 9 / 1,2b,3b,4b 4, 97 /97
Name of 1. Sursura 2. Rupangarh 3.Tyod 1. Sursura 2. Rupangarh 3.Tyod Gram 4. Khatoli 5. Ralawata 6. Bhadun 4. Khatoli 5. Ralawata 6. Bhadun Panchayats
Name of Sursura,Mordi, Ghaswa Ki Sursura,Mordi, Ghaswa Ki Villages Dhani,Rupangarh, Khatoli,Rahimpura, Dhani,Rupangarh, Cheetakhera,Mohanpura, Ralawata, Khatoli,Rahimpura,Mohanpura, Junda, Tyod, Kathoda Ralawata, Junda, Tyod, Kathoda
Project Cost 845.70 lacs 845.70 lacs (Rs in Lakhs)
Index
S.No Topics Page no.
1 Chapter Introduction General Features of watershed (Cost and Area details) Climatic and Hydrological information Other Development Schemes in the project area Details of infrastructure in the project areas Institutional arrangements (WCDC,PIA,WDT,WC) 2 Chapter Basic Data, Analysis and Scope 2.1 Demography Details 2.2 Development Indicators 2.3 Land use 2.4 Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis 2.5 Horticulture / Vegetable / Floriculture status 2.6 Land holding pattern 2.7 Livestock status With Per Capita Production 2.8 Fodder status 2.9 Farm Implements 2.10 NREGS Status 2.11 Migration details 2.12 Livelihood Details. 2.13 Existing SHG 2.14 Ground Water details 2.15 Drinking Water Status 2.16 Water use efficiency 2.17 Slope details 2.18 Water Budgeting 2.19 Soil Details 2.20 Soil erosion status 3 Chapter Proposed Development Plan 4 Chapter Activity wise Total Abstract of cost 5 Chapter Annual Action Plan 5.1 Project fund 5.2 Convergence Plan 6 Chapter Project outcomes 7 Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities 8 Enclosures 8 .1 Maps
a. Location –District, block, village, watershed location map b. Map of Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map c. Land Use Land Cover map d. Existing water bodies, DLT e. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing) f. GIS based intervention map g. Treatment map ie proposed works on revenue map
8.2 Documents of Agreements:
Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution Documents related to PRA exercise Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval Proceedings of Panchayat Samiti General body for DPR approval Proceedings of Zila Parishad Standing Committee for DPR approval
CERTIFICATE
Certified that the undersigned have proposed the appropriate and need based activities required in the watershed project area with active participation of beneficiaries along with consultation of Watershed Committees ( WCs). Approval of watershed project plan and DPR has been obtained from WC, Gram Sabha. The plan and DPR document of IWMP-13 ( Sursura – D )project, at P.S. Kishangarh ( Silora). District Ajmer is technically sound, viable and appropriate for implementation during the period 2012 - 2017.
We recommend that this plan be sanctioned and put to implementation.
Upsamiti Sursura Rupangarh Khatoli Tyod Ralawata Bhadun
Chairman
Secretary
Watershed Development Team Members :
1. Adarsh Chauhan ( Engi.)
2. Chiranjilal ( Vet.)
3. Vandana Chhipa ( So.Sc)
4. Neelam Mandarwal ( Agri.) ( Working for IWMP X)
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer & PIA Project Manager,WCDC
P.S Silora P.S Silora Distt.Ajmer
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
Sharply increase pressure from rapid growth of habitat and the resultant decline of open source contribute to two overarching water problems.
a) Depleting ground water supply.
b) Reduction in the availability of surface water and agriculture land for cultivation.
Developing a tool that models the complex interactions within the watershed will facilitate the identification of projects and programme to enhance the efficient use of the local water, soil and other resources, thereby providing an integrated approach for the upliftment of the area.
Sursura D project is located in the Ajmer District which has its historical importance and is situated centrally at the Rajasthan State . The watershed project villages are located on the Mega highway on Kishangarh-Parbatsar route in Kishangarh block. It is approximately 25 to 45 km from the project villages and district head quarter Ajmer is located 35-55 km from the project villages.
Sursura village is famous for rural pilgrimage. It’s a place of Veer Tejaji who sacrificed his life in the service of the society. Nearby and distant villagers have a strong belief in him and every year a mela is organized which lasts for about 10 days. Rupangarh is also an important upcoming town. It has been declared Sub- divisional headquarter in 2013 budget announcement. Its famous Rupangarh fort is now a hotel which attracts tourists for stay.
1.1 Location :- The watershed project area is situated between 26°38’20’’ to 26°40'20’’ North Latitude and 74°49' 10’’ to 74°56'38’’ East longitude. The project area is located approximately 45 km from the district head quarter 20 km from Tehsil head quarter and 30 km from block head quarter Silora. The total maximum length of the project area from west to east is 12 km. while the breadth from North to south is 20 km approximately.
The Micro Watersheds covered under the project are as below.
TABLE Detail of Watershed Project Villages in Watershed Atlas
S.No Name of Village Gram Panchayat Macro/Micro No 1 Roopangarh Roopangarh 8/1,2,17,18,9/1,2,97/97 2 Sursura Sursura 8/2,3,4,13,15,16,9/3 3 Mordi 8/1,2,15,16,17,18, 9/1,2,3 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 8/3,4,12 5 Tyod Tyod 8/15,17,18,9/2,3,4 6 Joonda 9/1,2,4 7 Ralawta Ralawta 8/4,11 8 Khatoli Khatoli 8/6,8,9 9 Rahimpura 8/9 10 Mohanpura 8/6,8,9 11 Kathoda Bhadoon 9/1,2,4,97/97 Source PD Core
Delineation of Area- Sursura D watershed project is delineated in 3 macro and 19 micro watershed projects. The detail of village and area in micro watershed is given below.
TABLE- Delinetaion of area
S.No Name of Village Macro Micro Area ( in Hac. ) TOTAL Area ( in Hac. ) Roopangarh 8 1 174.23 1 8 2 22.7 8 17 171.37 8 18 255.22 9 1 285.18 9 2 13.73 97 97 672.68 1596 2 Sursura 8 2 0.74 8 3 14.8 8 4 40.20 8 13 200.17 8 15 407.66 8 16 76.53 9 3 480.05 1220 3 Mordi 8 1 11.59 8 2 154.68 8 15 355.10 8 16 13.93 8 17 108.75 8 18 49.93 9 1 5.18 9 2 22.44 9 3 1.47 723 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 8 3 29.39 8 4 120.82 8 12 39.86 190 5 Tyod 8 15 5.40 8 17 29.89 8 18 3.52 9 2 517.80 9 3 165.60 9 4 8.38 731 6 Joonda 9 1 53.83 9 2 18.91 9 4 14.01 86 7 Ralawta 8 4 276.54 8 11 84.48 361 8 Khatoli 8 6 43.44 8 8 0.55 8 9 108.38 52 9 Rahimpura 8 9 100.00 10 Mohanpura 8 6 212.25 8 8 188.13 8 9 107.79 508 11 Kathoda 9 1 5.87 9 2 6.43 9 4 55.19 97 97 137.44 205 Total 3 19 5772.00 5772.00 Source PD Core
Micro Watershed Wise Area Detail -
No 8/ 1 8 / 2b 8 / 3 8 / 4B 8 / 6 8 / 8B 8 / 9B 8 /11b 8/12 8/13
Area 185.82 178.1 44.19 437.4 205.52 188.68 216.15 84.48 39.86 200.17 ( in 2 hac ) No 8 / 15 8 /16 8 / 17 8 / 18 9 / 1 9 / 2 9 / 3 9 / 4 97 / 97 TOTAL
Area 768.16 90.46 310.01 308.67 350.06 579.31 647.12 77.58 810.12 5772 ( in hac ) Source PD Core TOTAL Area ( in Hac. )
Roopangarh 100 52 458 205 Sursura 1596 361 Mordi 86 Ghaswa Ki Dhani
730 Tyod Joonda 1220 Ralawata 723 Khatoli
188 Rahimpura Mohanpura Kathoda
Area Distribution chart of eleven villages.
The project area is divided into eleven villages under four gram panchyats. The area covered under gram panchyats are as follows.
TABLE Detail of Project Area
S. Name of Gram Panchayat Total Area under Effective No Village Geographical Watershed Area area proposed 1 Roopangarh Roopangarh 3815 1596 1596 2 Sursura Sursura 3457 1220 1220 3 Mordi 883 723 640 4 Ghaswa Ki 190 188 188 Dhani 5 Tyod Tyod 2336 730 730 6 Joonda 787 86 86 7 Ralawta Ralawta 1869 361 360 8 Khatoli Khatoli 881 55 55 9 Rahimpura 436 100 100 10 Mohanpura 682 508 458 11 Kathoda Bhadoon 835 205 205 TOTAL 16169 5772 5638
TABLE - Gram Panchayat wise Area Detail and Sanction Cost
Name of Gram Panchayat Area in Ha Sanction cost ( lacs Rs )
Roopangarh 1596 239.40
Sursura 2048 307.20
Tyod 816 122.40
Ralawata 360 54.00
Khatoli 613 91.95
Bhadun 205 30.75
Total 5638 845.70
30.75 91.95 239.4 Roopangarh 205 54 613 1596 Sursura 360 Tyod 816 Ralawata 122.4 Khatoli 2048 Bhadun
307.2
Administrative Setup of District
The Ajmer district has been divided into 8 sub divisions. These sub divisions are further divided into 10 tehsils and 8 development blocks. Ajmer is having 1083 villages and 276 gram Panchayat. Ajmer district comes under Ajmer division.
TABLE Administrative Set Up of Ajmer District S.No Sub Division Tehsil Blocks 1 Ajmer Ajmer 2 Nasirabad Nasirabad Srinagar 3 Beawar Beawar Jawaja 4 Kishangarh Kishangarh Kishangarh,Arai 5 Kekri Kekri Kekri,Arai 6 Sarwar Kekri , Arai 7 Bhinay Bhinay Bhinay 8 Pisangan Pisangan Pisangan 9 Masuda Masuda Masuda 10 Roopangarh Kishangarh
INDEX MAP OF THE WATERSHED AREA -
General Features of IWMP-13 Sursura D (12-13) Watershed Project
Name of Project Sursura D ( IWMP – 13 )
Name of Program Integrated Watershed Management Programme Year of Sanction 2011-12 Location 26°38’20’’ to 26°40'20’’ North Latitude and 74°49' 10’’ to 75°56'38’’ East longitude Distance from key milestone Located mainly on Mega-highway ( Kishangarh to Parbatsar) Block Kishangarh District Ajmer Total Villages 11 Total Gram Panchayat 6 (Rupangarh, Sursura, Bhadun, Tyod, Ralawata & Khatoli) Macro and Micro Watersheds 3 Macro and 19 Micro Total Watershed Committee 6 Duration Six years ( 2011-12 to 2016-17) Total Geographical Area 16169 Ha Sanction Area 5638 Ha Area available for treatment 5638 Ha Total Sanction Cost 845.70 Lakhs Proposed budget on soil & water 473.59 Lakhs conservation works ( 56 % ) Proposed budget on Productivity 84.57 Lakhs Enhancement. ( 10 % ) Proposed Budget on Livelihood 76.12 Lakhs Enhancement ( 9 % ) Cost per Ha (consolidated ) 16811 per Ha Cost per Ha (IWMP project ) 15000 per Ha From Project Cost 845.70 Lakhs From Convergence 102.13 Lakhs Agro climatic zone III –A Major crops Jowar, Bajra, Moong , Maize, Wheat, Gram Slope range 0-10 % River Basin Banas Major soil type Sandy Loam Rainfall 412 mm Majority of caste Jat, Gurjar Major area affected by Wind and water erosion, Scaracity of water for irrigation etc Per capita of land 0.80 HA Literacy rate 62.5% Small and Marginal farmers more than 50% Major option of livelihoods Agriculture, Dairy, Wage Water Table 39-48 meter Source of drinking water Hand pump, Tubewell supply, Bisalpur Pipeline Quality of drinking water Good Irrigation source Open well and Pond Cattle Cow and Buffalo Nearest town Kishangarh Name of PIA AEN, Panchayat Samiti, Kishangarh, Ajmer Coordinating Person from PIA Rajeev Vallabh Mishra (A.En.) Address (HO) Office of the Panchyat Samiti Head Quarter –Silora National Highway , Kishangarh DWDU Project Manager, Soil and Water Conservation Building, Chaurasiyawas road, Ajmer 1.3 CLIMATIC AND HYDROLOGICAL INFORMATION
Agro climate zone- The Rajasthan state has been divided into five divisions on the basis of bio physical features, rainfall, soil profile and available water for irrigation. Three divisions have been further divided due to diversification. The agro climate of the Ajmer district is characterized by semi-arid. It is moderate and healthy. The district has a hot, dry summer and bracing cold season. The zone comes under III A which name as dry semi-arid flat land area, 54.6 % of total land of 29.48 lakh ha is comes under agriculture. Open well and talab are the key source of irrigation. TABLE - Characteristics of agro climate zone- III A Total area Net sown Districts Rainfall Max and Major crops Soil area range Min Temp 29.48 lac 54.5 % Ajmer 500-600 50 deg Bajra ,Moong, Sandy loam Ha Jaipur, mm cen. to 4 Gram, Jowar, Tonk, deg cen. Wheat, Dausa Topography -The area is composed of comparatively flat tracts of low difference between ridges and valleys. The hills are very less in project area and it is not surrounded by hills and no hillock found in the project area so drainage area is very less. Rainfall and Temperature
Mean annual rainfall (2000-2011) of the project area is 359.5 mm which is less than the average rainfall of 412 mm. The number of rainy days vary between 5 to 19, in monsoon period. Almost 95% of the total annual rainfall is received during the southwest monsoon, which enters the district in the last week of June and withdraws in the middle of September. Probability of average annual rainfall exceeding 500 mm is only 10%. However, there is 90% probability that the average rainfall will be 300- 450mm. The probability of occurrence of mean annual rainfall is 30-50%. Drought analysis based on agriculture criteria indicates that the district is prone to mild and normal type of droughts. Occurrence of severe and very severe type of drought is rare. January is the coldest month with mean maximum and minimum temperatures being lowest at 22.20 C & 4.50 C. Temperature in summer month, June, reaches up to 490 C. There is drop in temperature due to onset of monsoon and rises again in the month of September. Atmosphere is generally dry except during the monsoon period. The humidity is highest in August with mean daily relative humidity 80%. If we just analysis the data of last 13 years , we found that three times project area got under high deficit and two times under good rainfall otherwise rains occur to near to normal rainfall of project area.
TABLE – Average Annual Rainfall data Year 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Rainfall (mm) 590 749 548 200 436 397 226 355
No of Rainy days 18 19 15 6 12 11 9 10
Year 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Rainfall (mm) 396 359 162 310 300
No of Rainy days 11 10 5 11 10
800 600 400 Rainfall (mm) 200 No of Rainy days 0
Source Tehsil Kishangarh.
TABLE- Average Monthly rainfall (last ten years) Month Rainfall (mm) June 21.20 mm July 150.50 mm August 161.90 mm September 112.50 mm Source Tehsil Kishangarh.
TABLE- Temperature of season in project area
Season Max(degree centigrade) Min (degree centigrade) Summer 49.2 32 Winter 28 2.8 Rainy 38 15 Source Tehsil Kishangarh.
Christiansen (1968) Pan Evaporation Method (Source : Central Research Institute of Dryland Agriculture, Hyedrabad)
PET = 0.755 EoCT2 CW2 CH2CS2 …. (Eq.4) Where, Eo = open pan evaporation (mm) = 5.5mm CT2 = 0.862 + 0.179 (Tm/20) – 0.041 (Tm/20)2 Where, Tm is the mean temperature in °C Cw2 = 1.189 – 0.240 (W/6.7) + 0.051 (W/6.7)2 Where, W = mean wind speed 2 m above ground level in km per hour CH2 = 0.499 + 0.620 (Hm/0.60) - 0.119 (Hm/0.60)2 Where, Hm = mean relative humidity, expressed decimally CS2 = 0.904 + 0.0080 (S/0.8) + 0.088 (S/0.8)2 Where, S is the percentage of possible sunshine, expressed decimally.
PET = 0.755Eo CT2 CW2 CH2 CS2
CT2 = 0.862 + 0.179 (Tm/20) 0.041 (Tm/20)2 where Tm = Mean Temprature = 26.50 °C
= 1.027194
Cw2 = 1.189 – 0.240 (W/6.7) + 0.051 (W/6.7)2, where
= 1.209142 W mean wind speed ( 2m high) = 3.64 km/hr
CH2 = 0.499 + 0.620 (Hm/0.60) - 0.119 (Hm/0.60)2
= 0.927738 where Hm = Mean Relative Humidity = 0.4925
CS2 = 0.904 + 0.0080 (S/0.8) + 0.088 (S/0.8)2 where S = % of possible sunshine, expressed decimally = 0.80 (assumed)
= 0.8605
PET = 0.755 * 5.5 * 1.027194 *1.209142 *0.927738 *0.8605
= 4.12 mm / DaY
Annual PET = 4.12 * 365 = 1502.86 mm
Runoff i) Peak Rate (cum/hr) 281900 ii) Total run off volume of rainy season 2322.86 (ha.m.) iii) Time of return of maximum flood 5 years (Nil) 10 years (Nil) In-Year (Nil) iv)Periodicity of Drought in village area 3 years (once) 10 years In-Year (Nil) (thrice)
1.4 OTHER DEVELOPMENT SCHEME OF THE PROJECT AREA:
Scheme Name of the Key Targeted Provisions department interventions Beneficiaries under the S.No. under the Scheme Scheme
1 MGNREGS 1 Rural Employment Local 100 Days Development Generation , Water Residence ( Employment Department, Conservation, Job Card Generation to Infrastructure Holders) the Targeted 2 Forest Development Job Card Owner 3 Public Works Families. Department
4 Irrigation
2 Big Farm Agriculture Rain Water Big and Big Ponds up Ponds Development Harvesting for Marginal to cost of 10 Irrigation and other Farmers lacs being use constructed on 75 % subsidy.
3 National Horticulture Developing New Progressive Upto 90 % Horticulture Orchards, Farmers subsidy in Drip and Sprinkler Misson Drip Irrigation, Sprinkler Irrigation
1.5 Details of infrastructure in the project areas
S.No. Parameters Status
(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all- All 11 villages weather road
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity All 11 villages
(iii) No. of households without access to drinking water None
(iv) No. of educational institutions : (P) (S) (HS) (VI)
Primary(P)/ Secondary(S)/ Higher Secondary(HS)/ 15 5 2 1 vocational institution(VI)
(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Centre 11
(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary 4
(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 6
(viii) No. of villages with access to Banks 3
(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis 1
(x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries 0
(xi) Total quantity of surplus milk
(xii) No. of milk collection centers (U) (S) (PA) (O)
(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Private agency(PA)/ others (O)) 0 2 4 0
(xiii) No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Centre 11
(xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages (please specify)
(xv) Nearest KVK (xvi) Cooperative society (xvii) NGOs (xviii) Credit institutions
(i) Bank 2
(ii) Cooperative Society 2
(xix) Agro Service Centre's 1
TABLE- Description of facility available in agriculture and livestock
S.NO Infrastructure Facility Place Distance
1 Agriculture Mandi Kishangarh 10-20 km 2 Agriculture input shop (private) Kishangarh 10-20 km
3 Agriculture Cooperative Kishangarh 10-20 km 4 Local suppliers for purchase agriculture produce Each Village 0-1 km
5 Seed supplier Each Panchayat 1-2 km 6 Pesticides , fertilizer supplier Kishangarh 7 Storage facility Ajmer 30-45 km 8 Cold storage Kishangarh 15 km 9 Nearest town Kishangarh 15 km 10 Nearest local market Kishangarh, 15 km Ajmer 11 Farm tool and equipment shop Kishangarh 15 km 12 Veterinary hospitals Patan 6 km 13 A.I facility Ajmer 40-50 km 14 Nearest local market for purchase of cattle Kishangarh 10-20 km
1.6 Institutional Arrangements : -
Strong Institutions are the key factor for sustainability of any project. The five institutions at project level are described below.
Project Implementing Agency (PIA) Watershed Development Team (WDT) Self Help Groups (SHGs) Users Group (UGs) Watershed Committee (WC)
TABLE- Detail of PIA Name of PIA Panchayat Samiti Kishangarh
Name of chief functionary Rajeev Vallabh Mishra Designation A.En.NREGA Panchayat Samiti Kishangarh
Department Watershed Development & Soil Conservation.
Office address Panchayat Samiti, Kishangarh, Head quarter Silora National High way -79, Kishangarh , District Ajmer Phone 9414004654
Fax N/A
E mail [email protected]
Watershed Development Team (WDT)- WDT is the pillar of any watershed project. PIA recruited dedicated team of young professionals of four member’s team in multi disciplinary field. At present one member (Agriculture ) has left. Recruitment of the post is under process.
TABLE- Brief detail of WDT team
S.No Name Gender Age Designation Qualification Experience 1 Adarsh Kumar Male 28 Engineering B.Tech (Ag.) From Chauhan 01/06/2012 to continue 2 Chiranji Lal Male 27 Veterinary Diploma in From Kumawat Animal 01/06/2012 Husbandry to continue 3 Vandana Female 26 Social Scientist BA ( Sociology) From Chhipa 01/06/2012 to continue 4 Neelam Female 24 Agriculture B.Sc. ( Ag ) Working for Mandarwal IWMP X
About DWDU- The unit at district level looking after the IWMP is called DWDU. The office of DWDU is located in the Jila Parishad, Collectorate Ajmer managed byProject Manager/ XEN (Land resources). DWDU is currently looking after 26 IWMP watershed projects in the district.
TABLE - Detail of DWDU Name of DWDU Executive Engineer (Land Resources) District Ajmer Name of chief functionary Sh Kan Singh Solanki Designation Project Manager DWDU Total staff available 10 Technical staff 3 Supporting staff 7 Address Project Manager ( IWMP ),DWDU Chaurasiyawas Road, Ajmer Telephone No 0145-2641329
E mail [email protected]
About SLNA – This is the apex body at state level. Directorate of Watershed Development and Soil Conservation (WD & SC) is playing the role of SLNA in Rajasthan.
TABLE – Detail of SLNA Name of SLNA Directorate, Watershed Development & Soil Conservation State Rajasthan Name of chief functionary Dr. Arushi Malik
Designation Chief Executive Officer cum Director
Address Pant Krishi Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
Telephone No 0141-2227189
Fax No. 0141-2227858
E mail [email protected]
Watershed Committee (WC)-
As per envisaged in the common guidelines that Watershed committee would be formed at Gram Panchayat level in the Gram Sabha in a democratic manner to ensure the active involvement and participation of all segment of society. WDT team will provide the technical support in formation of the watershed committee. PIA constituted six WC (Sub committee- Watershed) one each at Gram Panchayat. The committee constituted in the gram sabha organized in the village. The gram sabha organized after series of village meetings in the village. The representatives from SHG, UG, GP were covered. Women have got appropriate representation in various committee.
Name of Gram Panchayat- Roopangarh Bank Name-Bank of Baroda Roopangarh and A/C No. 01260100010217
S.No Name of Member Father/Husband Sex Category Designation name 1 Mrs. Shobha Devi Mr.Rakesh tandan F GEN Chairmen Tandan 2 Mr.Surendra Kr Mr. M GEN Secretary Soni 3 Mr.Baldev Jajda Mr.Likhama M OBC Ward Member
4 Mr.Mangilal Mr.Omkar Mal M OBC W.M. 5 Mr.Murad Khan Mr.Nathu Khan M OBC UG 6 Mr.Girdhari Mr.Bhagirath M OBC UG 7 Mr.Damodar Mr.Ram Prasad M GEN UG 8 Mr.Bhagwan das Mr.Arjun M SC UG 9 Mr.Bhanwar lal Mr.Gheesa SC m 10 Mr.Sanjay Singh Mr.Vijay Singh M GEN 11 Mrs.Shanti Devi Mr.Madan F SC SHG 12 Mrs.Uma Devi Mr.Jamal Khan F OBC SHG
Name of Gram Panchayat- Sursura
Bank Name:- Bank of Baroda Sursura A/C No. 43130100000282 S.No Name of Member Husband/Father Sex Category Designation 1 Mrs. Yogita Sharma Mr.Mukesh Sharma F GEN Chairmen
2 Mr.Shiv Prashad Mr.Ramnivash M GEN Secretary Sharma Sharma 3 Mr.Kalyan Mr.Bhura M OBC Ward Member 4 Mr.Dhanna Lal Mr.Bhanwar lal M OBC W.M. 5 Mr.Jagdish Mr.Anna Mali M OBC W.M. 6 Mr.Ramlal Jat Mr.Jivan Jat M OBC UG 7 Mr.Jaipal Singh Mr.Bharat Singh M SC UG 8 Mr.Viradi Chand Mr.Sukhdev Jat M OBC UG 9 Mr.Rameshwar Das Mr.Prahalad Das M SC UG 10 Mr.Kalyan Mr.Bhanwara Gurjar M OBC UG 11 Mrs.Santosh Devi Mr.Shyodan Khatik F SC SHG 12 Mrs.Prem Devi Mr.Tejpal Regar F SC SHG
Name of Gram Panchayat- Tyod Bank Name - Bank of Baroda Sursura A/C No. 43130100000383 S.No Name of Member Father/husband Sex Category Designation 1 Mr. Virendra Singh Mr.Amar Singh M GEN Chairmen Rathore 2 Mr.Dhanraj Sharma Mr.Kailash Chandra Sharma M GEN Secretary
3 Mr.Ramdev Mr.Hajari Gurjar M OBC Ward Member
4 Mr.Bhairulal Mr.Shankar lal Sharma M OBC W.M.
5 Mr.Bhawar Mr.Narayan M SC UG 6 Mr.Naharu Ram Mr.Mukana Jat M OBC UG 7 Mr.Jogendra Singh Mr.Anand Singh M GEN UG 8 Mr.Bodhu Mr.Shyodan Gurjar M OBC UG 9 Mr.Ratan Nath Mr.Prabhu Nathi Jogi M SC UG
10 Mrs.Bhavari Devi Mr.Narsingh Das F GEN SHG 11 Mrs.Lali Devi Mrs.Bhagchand Sharma F GEN SHG
Name of Gram Panchayat- Ralawata Bank Name .UCO Bank-Kishangarh A/C No.24160110002056
S.No Name of Member Father/husband Sex Category Designation 1 Mrs.Manju Kanwar Mr.Mahendra Singh F GEN Chairmen 2 Mr.Yogesh Kumar Mr.Damodar Lal M GEN Secretary Dadhich 3 Mr.Rameshwar Mr.Bhanwar Lal M OBC Ward Member 4 Mr.Gajanand Mr.Moti Ram M SC W.M. 5 Mr.Ram Nivas Mr.Shyam Sundar M OBC UG & Upsarpanch 6 Mr.Chhitar Mr.Gyana Ram Mali M OBC UG 7 Mr.Chothu Mr.Chhitar Khatik M SC UG 8 Mr.Kana Ram Mr.Hanuman Sen M OBC UG 9 Mr.Shambhu Mr.Dhanna Ram M SC UG Prakash 10 Mr.Bhanwar Lal Mr.Gordhan Jat M OBC UG 11 Mrs.Kaushalya Devi Mr.Shambhu Prakash F SC SHG
12 Mrs.Kani Devi Mr.Bhagchand F OBC SHG
Name of Gram Panchayat- Khatoli Bank Name –Uco Bank-Kishangarh A/C No.-24160110013373
S.No Name of Member Father/husband Sex Category Designation 1 Mr. Jasveer Singh Mr. Mangal Singh M GEN Chairmen 2 Mrs. Sonu Kanwar Mr. Shiv Singh F GEN Secretary 3 Mr. Ramswaroop Mr.Ram Dayal M OBC UG 4 Mr. Ramprasad Mr.Gulab Parikh M GEN UG Parikh 5 Mr. Bhanwar Mr. Nand Singh M GEN. UG Singh 6 Mr. Satya Narayan Mr.Hari Das M GEN. UG Vaishanav 7 Mr.Nizamuddin Mr. Aladeen Khan M OBC UG 8 Mr. Sumer Singh Mr.Ganga vishan M OBC UG 9 Mr. Mukesh Singh Mr.Bhanwar Singh M GEN. Ward Member 10 Mr. Gend Mr. Shahabuddin M OBC Ward Mohammad Member 11 Mrs.Prembai Mr.Ganpat Singh F OBC SHG 12 Mrs.Vimla Kanwar Mr.Kimmat Singh F GEN. SHG
Name of Gram Panchayat- Bhadun Bank Name-Bank of Baroda Roopangarh and A/C No. 01260100010216
S.No Name of Member Father/husband Sex Category Designation 1 Mrs.Kiran Kanwar Mr.Pratap Singh F GEN Chairmen Rathore 2 Mr.Shivraj Mali Mr.Nanda Ram Mali M OBC Secretary 3 Mr.Mohan Lal Mr.Keshuram M OBC Ward Member 4 Mr.Kashiram Mr.Chhitar Ram M OBC W.M. 5 Mr.GokulRam Mr.Lala Ram M OBC UG 6 Mr.Dhanna Ram Mr.Lala Ram M OBC UG 7 Mr.Yuvraj Singh Mr.Raghuveer Singh M GEN UG 8 Mr.Rama Ram Mr.Sukha Ram M SC UG 9 Mr.Heera Lal Mr.Shyonarayan M OBC UG 10 Mrs.Santosh Devi Mr.Ugma Ram F OBC SHG 11 Mrs.Manju Devi Mr.Rameshwar F OBC SHG 12 Mrs.kaushalya Devi Mr.Kailash Chand F OBC SHG 13 Mrs.Manta Devi Mr.Vishnu Prasad F OBC SHG
Detail of SHGs
Name of Villages Gram Total Male Female Panchayat SHGs Member Member Roopangarh Roopangarh 10 0 102 Sursura Sursura 5 0 50 Mordi 3 0 46 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 0 0 0 Tyod Tyod 2 0 20 Joonda 4 0 40 Ralawta Ralawta 2 0 27
Khatoli Khatoli 3 0 30 Rahimpura 2 0 20 Mohanpura 0 0 0 Kathoda Bhadoon 10 11 102
Detail of UGs
Name of Villages Gram No of UG Total Male Female Panchayat members Roopangarh Roopangarh 4 32 32 0 Sursura Sursura 2 18 18 0 Mordi 1 8 8 0
Ghaswa Ki Dhani 1 8 8 0 Tyod Tyod 3 24 24 0 Joonda 1 7 7 0 Ralawta Ralawta 4 33 33 0
Khatoli Khatoli 1 10 10 0 Rahimpura 2 21 21 0 Mohanpura 1 8 8 0 Kathoda Bhadoon 4 45 45 0
Problems and scope of improvement in the project area
The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which can be achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhancement. 1427 ha land is arable wasteland out of which about 300 ha is expected to be brought under cultivation.
The productivity gap of major crops in the area as compared with district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small land holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green houses, Agro forestry, and fodder crops) and diversification in Livelihoods (Agriculture, Animal husbandry, self employment) 3500 Quintal fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 100 no of persons migrate due to lack of water availability at farm field; this migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area through increase in production and diversification in agriculture and Livelihoods.
Specific problem of the area in land degradation, water, Agriculture and in Animal Husbandry
IRRIGATION WATER STATUS: - Open wells / tube wells and Ponds are the main sources of irrigation in the project area. Six ponds available in the project area which are not properly managed. The condition of these ponds is not in good conditions and the small canals linked with the pond are also in very poor condition and demand urgent repair and renovation work but Gram Panchayat has no fund and also no idea about legal procedures. The water table in the well is 39-48 meter. The available irrigation sources are able to provide the ensure irrigation facility to only 0.60 % of the cultivable land.
DRINKING WATER STATUS: - The main source of drinking water in the project area is hand pump. Parts of the area have also been covered by Bisalpur Pipeline. The other sources are tube well and open well. During season of drought or low rainfall, drinking water become problem in summer and it becomes severe in dry months. PRA reveal the information that approximately 70- 85 % of the village communities depend on hand pump for drinking purpose.
LIVESTOCK STATUS: - Project communities prefer Buffalo / Cow in the project area. Large part of community members has desi breed cow and buffalo. Gir is the good quality breed easily available and most preferred breed in the project area. They preferred it due to high productivity, good looking and its capacity to adaptation in the project area climate. Its resale value is good. More than 70 % of farmers have desi cow in the project area, followed by Gir cow and few progressive farmers have high breed cow. The choice in high breed is HF cross and Jersy cross however now farmers are not preferred high breed animal due to its low fat percentage because dairy pay the value of milk on availability of fat percentage in milk. The average productivity of milk for desi cow is 2 to 4 liter, 5 to 8 liter for Gir and 10 to 14 liter for cross breed. Farmers of project area also prefer to rear buffalo.The most prefer breed in buffalo is Murrah breed. The productivity of buffalo is between 7 to 10 liter depending on the breed and quality of animal. Probably 20% of the cattle reared have more than 20 % of the murrah breed. In spite of large number of livestock, production is less. Hence improve productivity of cattle is a big challenge for the PIA.
Base Line Survey Format for IWMP MIS website
Project Name: – IWMP-13
Total Geographical Area of Project (Lakh Hectares):- 0. 05772
Treatable Area :- 0.05638
Wasteland (Lakh Hectares) 0.01500 Rainfed Agricultural 0.03492 Land (Lakh Hectares)
Total Cropped Area (Lakh Hectares) 0.04852 Net Sown Area (Lakh 0.03548 Hectares)
Total no. of Water Storage 20 Total no. of Water 234 Structure Extracting Units
Total storage capacity of water 20900 storage structures (cubic meters)
No. of Household
SC 502 ST 12
Others 3388
Total Population of the project 17693 No. of Household of 221 Area Landless people
Total no. of BPL Household 171
No. of Small Farmer House hold 540 No. of Marginal Farmer’s 2520 Household
Depth of Ground Water (meters) below Ground level
Pre- monsoon 48 m Post-monsoon 39 m
No. of person-days of Seasonal 33100 Migration
CHAPTER TWO Socio Economic Features – Problems & Scope
2.1 DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS : - Sursura – D Watershed encloses 3902 families in its area. Sursura and Rupangarh villages are densely populated whereas others are medium to scarcely populated villages. Area has about 14 % of SC population . Majority of farmers are Small. The demographic datas are as below.
S.No. Name of Village Total Population Male Female Total SC ST BPL Total HH Household 1 Roopangarh 3780 3515 7295 852 46 107 1915
2 Sursura 1315 1269 2584 353 27 0 675 3 Mordi 1105 975 2080 337 0 0 179 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 172 162 334 0 0 0 26
5 Tyod 878 756 1634 312 0 34 313
6 Joonda 56 49 105 16 0 1 29
7 Ralawta 755 725 1580 385 0 21 298
8 Khatoli 145 136 281 21 0 3 62 9 Rahimpura 251 221 472 0 0 0 172
10 Mohanpura 371 358 729 119 0 2 115 11 Kathoda 305 294 599 89 0 3 118 Total 9133 8460 17693 2484 73 171 3902
Source Census and PRA
Kathoda
Rahimpura
Ralawta OBC & Others SC Tyod ST Mordi
Roopangarh 0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Village wise SC & ST Population Distribution.
2.2 Development Indicators:
Watershed project is focused on the holistic approach of socio-economic development of the area along with the development of land and productivity. Stress will be given on the improvement of the following factors:-
1. Increase in Ground Water Table. ( in-situ Moisture Conservation) 2. Decrease in soil erosion. 3. Increase in the Net Cropping area. 4. Increase in yield per Hectare. 5. Increase in the ancillary activities fishery, poultry,rural craftsmanship etc. 6. Increase in the livestock produce. 7. Increase in the per capita income of the beneficiaries.
8. Decrease in the migration from the area.
S. No. Development Indicators State Project Area
1 Per capita income (Rs.) 47506 22000
2 Poverty ratio 0.22
3 Literacy (%) 67.06 62.5
4 Sex Ratio 921 926
5 Infant mortality rate 55 per 1000 NA
6 Maternal mortality ratio 318 per lac NA
2.2.1 Selection Criteria for Watershed.
Department of land resources developed a list of parameters to facilitate the department for identification of the watershed project for treatment. Panchayat Samiti, Kishangarh proposed the Sursura – D ( IWMP -13) watershed on the basis of same 13 parameters. A composite index has been developed on the weightage given. List of parameters and scores against each parameter is mentioned below. 105.5 weightage out of 150 shows the need of the watershed project in the area.
Table- Weightage Index
S. Criteria Maximum score Weightage No. I Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 2.5
Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 5 Iii Actual wages 5 5 Iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 5
V Ground water status 5 3 Vi Moisture index/ 15 15 DPAP/ DDP Block Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 15
Viii Drinking water 10 5 Ix Degraded land 15 10
X Productivity potential of the land 15 15
Xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already 10 10 been developed/ treated
Xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one 15 15 contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
Xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one 15 0 contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
Total 150 105.5
2.3 Land Use Pattern of Sursura D Watershed Project:-
Land use is the most important feature of any watershed project. For Sursura - D watershed project, land use pattern is quite surprising which is proved by the table given below. Majority of the land is Arable which is mainly rain-fed. Area under assured irrigation is only 36 hac.
Land Use Table-2.3a Total area in Ha.
Private Panchayat Government Community Total
Agriculture Land 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary fallow 1427 0 0 0 1427
Permanent Fallow 0 74 0 74
Cultivated Rainfed 4816 0 0 0 4816
Cultivated irrigated 36 0 0 0 36
Net Sown Area 3548 0 0 0 3548
Net Area sown more 1303 0 0 0 1303 than once Forest Land 0 0 9 0 9
Waste Land 0 0 0 0 0
Pastures 0 600 0 0 600
Others 0 0 134 0 134
Source PD Core
TABLE- Land Use Pattern
Name of Villages Total Arable Land Non Arable land area Cultivable Non Pasture Forest Revenue / in Ha. Irrigated Non Cultivable Govt. Irrigated Waste Roopangarh 1596 0 834.57 543.75 195.44 0 22.24 Sursura 1220 12.80 996.69 187.23 7.62 0 15.66 Mordi 640 0 257.34 167.00 202.46 4.55 8.65
Ghaswa Ki 188 14.68 121.90 46.61 0.64 0 4.17 Dhani Tyod 730 0 604.45 107.98 14.40 0 3.16 Joonda 86 0 13.49 6.21 66.32 0 0 Ralawata 360 8.56 190.80 151.13 0 0 9.51 Khatoli 55 0 35.39 19.2 0 0.41 0 Rahimpura 100 0 57.30 26.5 16.20 0 0 Mohanpura 458 0 233.53 135.18 79.43 3.55 6.31 Kathoda 205 0 146.81 36.71 17.87 0 3.61 TOTAL 5638 36.04 3492.27 1427.5 600.38 8.51 73.31
1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 TOTAL Non ARABLE 200 100 0 TOTAL ARABLE
TOTAL Non ARABLE
Mordi
Tyod
Sursura
Joonda
Khatoli
Roopangarh
Ralawata
Kathoda
Rahimpura
Mohanpura Ghaswa KiDhani
Figure shows the comparison of Arable and Non Arable Area in various villages of the project area. Major part of Non- Arable is under Pasture. About 87.9 percent of total area is Arable.
The project area has 1427 ha of cultivable wasteland. 200 ha of fallow land can be brought under cultivation if some irrigation source can be provided through. Construction of WHS like Khadin, Tanka, Farm ponds etc. and also through demonstration of rain fed varieties of crops. Construction of WHS can also increase in area under irrigation which is only 0.6 %. Activities like Earthen check dams, V-ditches & WHS, Afforestation of wastelands and 70 Hac Pasture development will be taken up on these lands
Pasture development the land use table shows that there is 600 hectare pasture land (10.6 %).
This emphasizes the need for taking up pastureland development works through sowing of promising species of grasses like stylo hamata and dhaman and forestry plantation.
TABLE 2.4 - Cropping pattern of project area Type of Crops Name of Crop Main variety Productivity (Qt/Ha) Kharif Jowar CSV-15 2.40 Bajra MH-179,HHB-67 4.80 Til Til PratapTC-25,TC-46 16.00 Maize Ageti-76,Ganga -8 6.0 Moong K-851 1.80 Gowar RGC-936,987,2,3,197 6.00 Rabi Wheat Raj-3077,3777,3765 18.50 Barley RajKiran,RD-2035 19.00 Gram/ Chick Pea Dohad Yellow,C-235 7.10 Tara Meera T-1 4.00 Mustard RGN-48,Bio-902,Laxmi 4.00 Crop Rotation
Bajra - Wheat
Bajra - Fallow
Moong - Mustard
Moong - Fallow
Fallow - Wheat
Fallow - Barley
Fallow - Gram
Maize - Fallow
Fallow - Mustard
Gowar - Fallow
Moong - Wheat
There is scope for change in crop rotation in fields where there are fallow lands through Soil and Water conservation measures, crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture.
Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation can change the area under single cropping to double and multiple cropping.
2.4.1 Agriculture Status & Productivity Gap Analysis Rajasthan is the biggest state of the country in terms of geographical area and its economic development is largely dependent on the agriculture. The total geographical area of the state is 307.44 lakh hectares in which 49.21% area under cultivation and only 0.6 % of land under irrigation and remaining is under rain fed farming whereas Ajmer district has Cultivable area of the district is 7538.13 sq km (72.11 %) whereas uncultivable area of the district is 2916.82 sq. km (27.89 %). As the area comprises of about 88 % of arable land, agriculture is the prime occupation of livelihood. Discussion with farmers gives an impression that agriculture production area is fluctuating and depends on the rains of the particular year. A large part of the village population is composed of small and marginal farmers with subsidence agriculture, mainly for self-sufficiency. The special feature of the project area is the major area covered under cultivation of crops occupied by food grains and pulses. The agriculture is alternated between two seasons of Kharif and Rabi. The major crops under Kharif are Maize, Jowar Til, Bajra, Moong and Gowar which are in addition to hardy and less water consuming. The major crops under Rabi are Wheat, Gram, Mustard, and Barley cultivating in the project area. It was very difficult to get the area sown under Rabi because it purely depend on the availability of rains in the monsoon, time of rains and availability of rains in winter (Maawath). Wheat area increase if project area gets good rains and also in winter (Maawath) but area under Gram and followed by Mustard and Tarameera increases if inadequate rains find in project area.
TABLE- Fertilizer Pattern Name of Pesticides (Lt) Fertilizer (Kg/Ha) crops Urea DAP Super FYM phosphate (Ton /Ha) Jowar Chloropyrophos 30 60 Bajra Chloropyrophos 30 60 20 ton /Ha Maize 50 Til Thyram 5gm/ kg seed 30 20 ton / Hac Gram Rizobium Culture 60 Wheat FIR,Chloropyrophos 50 60 20 ton / Ha Barley Culture 50 60 Source : Agriculture Dept. Along with the use of chemical fertilizers, FYM is still the first choice of farmers to use as manure. Very few progressive farmers use vermi compost in their fields.
Table- Village wise cropped area S.No Name of Villages Gross cropped area Double cropped area ( Net sown area ( ( in Hac ) in Hac ) in Hac.) 1. Roopangarh 997 198 799 2. Sursura 1396 383 1013 3. Mordi 380 132 247 4. Ghaswa Ki Dhani 234 94 140 5. Tyod 815 210 605 6. Joonda 21 7 14 7. Ralawta 335 134 201 8. Khatoli 30 0 30 9. Rahimpura 134 48 85 10. Mohanpura 348 63 285 11. Kathoda 162 34 128 Total 4852 1303 3548 Source PD Core 2.4.2 Inputs in agriculture Seed, fertilizer and pesticides are the major production component responsible for the productivity of any crop variety due to its inherent potential. WDT conducted PRA in the project villages to find out the current status about input in agriculture. The key points of the FGD are strongly demand to make necessary arrangement for smoothly and timely availability of inputs to farmers at low cost. Looking to the scenario of seed replacement rate (SRR) for various crops in the project area, which is more in Bajra crop. There is large scope for increasing the SRR in all crops to provide the basket of varieties to widen the choice for farmers to select the varieties suited to their requirement. The other aspect of seed management is the timely availability of the seed to the growers so that they sow the crop in time with suitable variety/hybrid rather than using the local seed material. Similarly, the quality of the seed available with the traders is monitored regularly to avoid the possibility of the poor quality seed. Farmer’s knowledge is very poor on available hybrid seeds. He purchases the seeds from the market which is provided by the local supplier. They are exploited by the local suppliers in terms of rate and quality of seed. Farmers are not happy with the services of availability of seed and fertilizer at time with the cooperatives. The stock available with the cooperatives and LAMPS is very less as compare to demand of the area. Poor farmers did not get the input at time. Poor farmers have not enough money to purchase the input at time of sowing so he has to take loan or debt from nearby families /relatives.
2.4.3 Productivity Gap Analysis –
Agriculture Sector There are a number of factors determining the production potential of the particular crops. There is large number of biotic or a-biotic production components responsible for the yielding ability of a particular crop. These may be crop climatic conditions especially the moisture index, length of growing period of the crop, soil type, and nutrient availability in the soil, diseases and pests incidence and agronomic practices, improper water management. The most important factor is low percentage of seed replacement rate. Another important factor is the level of awareness amongst the growers about the crop and production practices including post-harvest management also plays an important role in narrowing the productivity gap. It is therefore necessary to assess the critical gaps, factors responsible for the gap, strategy to overcome the gap, approach and methodology to be adopted to implement the strategy, its performance indicators followed by sustainability outputs of the activity. TABLE- Comparative analysis of productivity Name of Yield in Qt/Ha Crop Project area Ajmer Rajasthan India Potential Average Average attainable yield Bajra 4.80 6.50 6.32 8.50 10.20 Moong 1.80 2.70 3.10 3.50 4.20 Til 16.0 17.00 18.20 19.00 22.0 Jowar 2.40 3.10 3.50 3.60 4.00 Wheat 18.50 22.20 29.12 28.00 35.00 Gram 7.10 9.00 9.00 8.45 9.00 Maize 6.00 8.20 14.00 19.12 24.00
140
120
100 Potential attainable yield 80 India Rajasthan 60 Ajmer Project area 40
20
0 Bajra Moong Til Jowar Wheat Gram
The analysis of data reveals the fact that there is a huge yield gap of the main crops grown in the project area with respect to the average productivity of the Ajmer district, Rajasthan. This gap is very wide if we compare with the highest productivity at the national level and the potential attainable yield at National level in ideal condition. The main reason for low yield is lack of awareness of the farmer about the improve technology and practices, low seed replacement rate and supportive mechanism in the project area.
Reason for low productivity of agriculture 1. Area is rain fed and success or failure of monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture. Rainfall is generally unreliable due to erratic, inadequate and uncertainty. 2. Lack of improve technology and modern practices in agriculture adopted by majority of farmer. 3. Lack of adequate farm mechanization in agriculture. 4. Lack of good quality seed and fertilizer at time at optimum cost. 5. Lack of facility for storage and marketing. 6. Low use efficiency of water. The additional production of 10 to 50 % in the all major crops would help in increase the additional income sources of the farmers in the direction of sustainable livelihoods.
Issue Gap and factor responsible for Strategy gap Variety of Seed Non availability of seed Develop farmer awareness to Poor SRR rate choose quality seed suitable to that Lack of farmer awareness about area good quality of seed . Crop demonstration through Farmer lack of knowledge about participatory approaches expiry of seed. Increasing seed availability at Market preference and dominancy proper time to decides the seed Technology and Lack of technical know how about Raising awareness through various Practice improve methods of agriculture means adopted in for sowing, weeding, harvesting Demonstration of improved farm etc. equipment agriculture Lack of farm mechanization Field training to demonstrate the Farmer attitude for low risk improve practices in field from taking capacity sowing to harvesting Farmer hesitation for taking Exposure of farmer and build up initiatives their capacity to motivate. Lack of support to motivate Efforts to make collaboration with farmer from line department/ institution and expert institute/NGO Crop nutrition Poor understanding of farmer Develop soil health card of the and soil health towards soil health and its individual farmer to use relation to plant. fertilizer pattern and nutrients Facility available for soil as per recommendation testing Productivity of 10-50 % gap in productivity as Farmer capacity building for crops compare to identified potential adopting improve practices and yield of crop in context of state. modern technology in Technical knowhow is not up agriculture to the mark Collective efforts to ensure the Lack of supply of agriculture supply of agriculture input input at time Introduction of Package of INM Lack of irrigation facility and IPM and FYM Address the issue of soil fertility Crop Focus on mainly traditional Demonstrate horticulture diversification crops orchard and vegetable Lack of exposure cultivation with few progressive Lack of initiates farmers Low risk taking capacity
Water Poor show of micro irrigation Demonstration of sprinkler and productivity system drip irrigation system Poor water use efficiency of Water distribution change to canal system improve water use efficiency
2.5 Horticulture, Floriculture and Vegetables:
TABLE- Detail of project area on crop diversification
Name of Villages No of families for Fruit No of farmer s for cultivation Vegetable cultivation Roopangarh 0 10 Sursura 3 35
Mordi 0 0 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 0 2 Tyod 0 0
Joonda 0 3
Ralawta 0 5
Khatoli 0 0
Rahimpura 0 0
Mohanpura 0 2
Kathoda 0 1 Total 3 58
Source PRA
Farmers in project area are mainly involved in traditional agriculture practices and believe in food grain and pulses. They are hesitating to move towards crop diversification. In project area communities mainly prefer citrus, papaya and pomegranate for fruit cultivation. Very few farmers are cultivating vegetables. There is better scope to mobilize the resources of National Horticulture Mission (NHM) in the project area. The project area is highly suitable in term of ecology for cultivation of fruits and vegetable cultivation. Floriculture activity is almost negligible and its development in the area is a mammoth task. This activity needs to be emphasized for promotion.
2.6 Land Holding Pattern of the Project Area:
Land classification on the basis of land holding is very interesting in the project areas. Table below shows the village wise data of each project village about types of farmers and their respective land holding. Analysis of the data of project villages reveals the fact that approximately 64.5 % of farmer comes under marginal farmer category followed by small farmers 13.8%, Average land holding of the project area is 0.85 ha land.
TABLE- Land Holding status of project villages S.No Name of village Total Land Small Marginal Medium Big families Less Farmer Farmer 1 Roopangarh 1915 132 242 1512 17 12 2 Sursura 675 23 165 287 171 29 3 Mordi 179 13 12 65 67 22 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 26 0 6 20 0 0 5 Tyod 313 15 19 209 53 17 6 Joonda 29 2 2 9 15 1 7 Ralawta 298 18 22 154 85 19 8 Khatoli 62 2 17 33 9 1 9 Rahimpura 172 2 15 63 83 9 10 Mohanpura 115 5 34 76 0 0 11 Kathoda 118 9 6 92 6 5 TOTAL 3902 221 540 2520 506 115
Source: PRA
2.7 Livestock- Rajasthan state has the biggest share of the animals (20%) in the country. Livestock in Ajmer district occupies a prominent position contributing significantly to the livelihood, mitigation of risks and distress of the farmers. The livestock sector has been able to provide a good coping mechanism and reduced vulnerability in the region which has been experiencing drought like situation consecutively every two to three years
Project communities of Sursura D watershed have almost equal share of Cow and Buffalo in the project area. Large part of community members has desi breed cow and buffalo. Gir is the good quality breed easily available and most preferred breed in the project area. They preferred it due to high productivity, good looking and its capacity to adaptation in the project area climate. Its resale value is good in the project area and easily available in the nearby area. More than 85 % of farmers have desi cow in the project area, followed by Gir cow and few progressive farmers have high breed cow. Now farmers are not preferred high breed animal due to its low fat percentage. The average productivity of milk for desi cow is 2 to 4 liter, 5 to 8 liter for Gir and 10 to 14 liter for cross breed. The productivity of buffalo is between 7 to 10 liter depending on the breed and quality of animal. In spite of large number of livestock, production is less. Hence improve productivity of cattle is a big challenge for the project implementing agency. Commonly the small animals Goat and Sheep are reared by the poor while the large animals Cattle, Buffaloes etc. by the comparatively better ups. The farmers are maintaining their livestock for drought purpose and getting milk & meat products from it. Meat consumption is very less within the area. They are lacking in management, feeding, breeding and disease control measures. As a result there is poor growth, non-descript offspring and huge mortality of animals/ birds due to out breaks. The farmers are facing difficulty in availing common minimum livestock services like restraining, wound dressing, administration of medicines, outbreak reporting etc. Provision of doorstep services for these common problems can minimize the loss significantly. But the farmers are facing difficulties to avail such services as and when required at their doorstep due to remoteness and inadequate professional manpower in Livestock Department. Provision of free medicines in vetenary hospitals by the State Government from year 2012 has contributed as a little relief to the cattle breeders.
TABLE- Livestock detail of the Project Area Name of villages Cow Buffalo Goat Sheep Others Total Desi High Desi High breed breed Roopangarh 570 45 650 52 450 400 75 2242
Sursura 750 80 850 75 1050 650 85 3540
Mordi 110 20 95 15 120 80 35 475
Ghaswa Ki Dhani 180 125 200 15 250 150 55 975
Tyod 350 35 400 25 200 80 55 1145
Joonda 85 25 80 20 120 80 50 460
Ralawta 360 25 280 20 375 250 55 1365
Khatoli 160 20 150 18 180 75 35 638
Rahimpura 35 10 40 5 65 40 20 215
Mohanpura 75 15 60 10 110 55 30 355
Kathoda 80 25 75 10 110 90 30 420
Total 2755 425 2880 265 3030 1950 525 11830
Source-PRA
TABLE- Productivity of Cattle in project area
S.NO Livestock Purpose Productivity
1 Cow –Deshi Milk , 1.5-2 Lt /Day
2 Cow-High breed Milk 5-7 Lt / Day
3 Buffalo- Deshi Milk 4-6 Lt / Day
4 Buffalo-High breed ( Murrah) Milk 8-10 Lt / Day
5 Goat Milk , 0.5-1 Ltr / Day
6 Goat Meat 20-30 Kgs / No.
7 Sheep Wool 0.5-1.0 Kg / No
Source: PRA
TABLE- Status of Dairy in the Project Area
Name of Dairy Milk Production Self-Use No. Of Name of dairy Village (ltrs / Day) (ltrs / Day) Dairy Roopangarh 2600-2750 1400-1550 7 Saras, Lotus, Amul, Rajpurohit
Sursura 3100-3300 1550-1700 4 Saras
Mordi 600-720 100-130 1 Saras
Ghaswa Ki 1000-1100 300-350 1 Saras Dhani Tyod 1950-2000 850-900 3 Saras, Lotus Joonda 500-600 100-150 1 Saras Ralawta 1500-1600 650-700 3 Saras Khatoli 850-1000 200-250 2 Saras Rahimpura 250-300 50-75 1 Saras Mohanpura 400-450 75-80 1 Saras Kathoda 550-600 90-120 1 Saras Source PRA
2.8 Fodder status PIA organized focus group discussion in the project area to assess the fodder status in the village. The existing cultivable land for fodder is very less in the project area. It is not adequate to fulfill the demand of the communities. Majority of family grow green fodder at their field and use Source of Fodder crops residue for the fodder. It was Pasture Fodder crop Crop Residue Other revealed in the discussion that fodder status is depending on the monsoon. If 10% rains are good then project community
40% have no problem regarding fodder and
30% it is at surplus stage but in drought or in condition of less rains , fodder availability is less and community face 20% the problem. in last ten years community faced three times problems for fodder availability during less years of rainfall.
Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)
S.No Item Unit Area
1 Existing Cultivable area under Ha 960 Fodder 2 Production of Green fodder Tons/year 0.50
3 Production of Dry fodder Tons/ Year 1.90
4 Area under Pastures Ha 600
5 Production of fodder Tons/year 2.40
6 Existing area under Fuel wood Ha 65
7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day -
8 Silage Pits No -
9 Availability of fodder quintals 30225
10 Deficiencys of fodder quintals 30000
The table above shows there is fodder deficiency of 30000 quintals (Requirement is 60225 quintal and availability 30225 quintal) To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and demand there is need for
Increase in area under fodder crops Increase in productivity of fodder crops Development of pastures And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few but productive animals
Gap Analysis in Livestock Sector
Issue Gap and factor responsible for Strategy gap Productivity 30-50 % gap in productivity Improved breed by natural with respect to potential and artificial method. yield of livestock in project Demonstration of improve area feeding practices. Lack of awareness and Demonstration of feeding technical know how about through mangers. livestock rearing, feeding management practice. Availability of desi breed. Health Lack of availability of Capacity building of local facilities for primary health youth for primary health treatment treatment. lack of facilities for improve Provision of improve breed of breed in the project area cattle. Nutrition Lack of technical know how Demonstration of improve about improve feeding feeding practices. management Demonstration of forage crops.
2.9 Farm Mechanization:- The agriculture equipment industry is a key sector that contributes to agriculture growth and productivity. Mechanized farming is modern scientific methods of cultivation. It improves productivity and production of farm land and reduces cost of cultivation as also human drudgery by facilitating efficient handling of agriculture operations. The status of project area in farm mechanization is not very encouraging. Big farmers of project area have their own tractors, seed drill and threshers in the project area. Majority of farmer’s specially small, marginal and medium farmers around 80-85 % do not have their own farm equipment so they hire the farm equipment whenever they require from the same village or nearby area. Farmers are attracting towards tractor drawn seed and fertilizer drill, thresher cum harvester etc. They spent approximately 8000-15000 on hire the equipment for one ha of land.
TABLE Farm equipment status in project area Name of equipment No Tractor 70 Sprayers 46 Cultivators 40 Seed drill 18 Seed cum fertilizer drill 4 Thresher 13
2.10 MGNREGS:- This scheme has a strong hold in Ajmer District. During peak seasons of labour demand ( April, May & June ) about 25000 labours are deployed in block Kishangarh. Except Rupangarh village, in every other villages of project area, almost 80 % of Jobcard holders demand labour under MGNREGS. Densely populated Rupangarh offer other opportunities for the residents. Less than 50 % jobcard holders ask for job under Narega works.
TABLE Status of Employment Generation in MNREGS : -
Name of villages No.of Job Card Mandays Major activities taken Issued Generated during up under the scheme 2011-12 Roopangarh 2017 72612 Gravel Road, Cement Block Roads, Talab Sursura 1500 73125 Desilting & individual Benificiaries works of Mordi 129 7676 Farmpond, Arable VCB Ghaswa Ki Dhani 67 3283 etc.
Tyod 956 57360
Joonda 220 14960
Ralawta 928 55680
Khatoli 657 34164 Rahimpura 144 10404
Mohanpura 283 20376
Kathoda 310 17360
Total 7211 36700 Note : Datas are of complete village and not of project area only.Source PO Silora( Kishangarh)
2.11 Migration
Its vicinity to the State capital, Jaipur allures many youth to migrate from the area. During discussion it was found that unemployment among youth is the major reason for migration. Youth community those have studied six to eight class or more have no work in the project villages or nearby area so they migrate to the big cities in search of employment. Many youth will go the same place where already young peoples of the project villages or nearby area are engaged with some works in these cities. Kishangarh being the largest Marble Mandi and many more upcoming Marble cutting plants, will provide employment to a certain extent. But it can reduce the migration of up to 1-2 %.
TABLE- Status of Migration in project area S.No. Name of Village No of persons 1 Roopangarh 112 2 Sursura 21 3 Mordi 5 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 2 5 Tyod 17 6 Joonda 5 7 Ralawta 23 8 Khatoli 11 9 Rahimpura 21 10 Mohanpura 91 11 Kathoda 23 Total 331 2.12 Livelihood Details –
Project Fund allows a handsome amount of 9 % for the development of livelihood activities through SHG and other production measures. Project facilitates the community to give the marking in the existing status of the livelihood capitals on all the five capitals. Firstly all the livelihood capitals were described them in detail and then facilitated the process through marking the process from maximum out of five.
Capital Key attributes
Human Capital Skill, Knowledge, Experience, Labor, Awareness
Social Capital Network, Institutions, Liaison
Physical Capital Infrastructure, Asset with family
Financial capital Source of income, Indebt ness in project area
Natural capital Land, Water, Forest, Vegetation etc
Table 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)
Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income
Cultivators 60 30000
Dairying 122 48000
Sheep breeding 8 55000
Landless Agri. Laborers 221 35000
Source PRA
Table 2.12 (b) Major activities (Off Farm)
Name of activity Households/individuals Average annual income Artisans 24 120000 Carpenter 22 136000 Blacksmith 16 115000 Leather Craft 75 80000 Porter 26 85000 Mason 115 108000
Others 104 55000
Source PRA WDT team carried out the PRA in the project area to identify the income sources of livelihoods of the project communities. The analysis of data reveals that agriculture is the prime source of income followed by dairy. The other important source of income is wage labor. Approximately more than 70 % of the population is workforce in the project area. Very few families in the project area are engage in self-employment, business and service in private or government sector. Communities have rain fed land have engaged in more than one occupation for their livelihoods. They engage in agriculture for six- seven months and remaining time wage in agriculture or non-farming sector is the key occupation of such community.
2.13 Existing SHGs
Existing Self Help Groups are mainly of women and their activities limit to the intra- loaning to the group member. Old groups and new ones formed, needs to be trained for skill development and increase their per capita income.
Village TYOD S.No. Name of SHG No. of Members Formation Date Monthly Name of Bank A / C No. Deposit 10 50 131701402806 1 Durga 15-02- BOB , Harmada 2007 10 50 2 Saraswati 10/10/2012
Village Junda 10 100 06@522 3 Dugmia 10/5/2004 BOB , Harmada 10 100 06@291 4 Baba 5/5/2004 BOB , Harmada Ramdev 10 100 06@283 5 Ganga Maiya 15-05- BOB , Harmada 2004 10 100 6811740 6 Shakti 1/1/2007 BOB , Harmada
Village Khatoli 10 20 1 Nav Durga 1/8/2012 10 50 2 Mahalaxmi 1/9/2012 10 100 15670110024188 3 Jai Ambe 30-10- Uco Bank , Kishangarh 2011 10 100 4 Krishna 30-10- 2011
Village Rahimpura 10 50 5 Fahah 1/1/2012 10 20 15670110029503 6 Afsana 15-06-11 Uco Bank , Kishangarh
Village Ralawata 13 100 61004462344 1 Chamtkar 20-11- SBBJ, Kishangarh 2007 14 100 2 Sharda 1/5/2010 ICICI, Kishangarh Maiya 10 50 6100446626 3 Bande Balaji 15-1-2008 SBBJ, Kishangarh 10 100 283 4 Jai Santoshi 20-02- Cooperative Bank Khatoli Maa 2010 10 50 284 5 Bhuvneshwar 10/8/2003 Cooperative Bank Khatoli
Village Sursura 10 50 08@5549 1 Veer Teja 11/5/2004 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 01@7446 2 Kanta 1/7/2009 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 01@9245 3 Sitara 1/7/2011 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 01@4452 4 Rekha Soni 20-10- BOB, Rupangarh 2010 10 50 5 Ali 26-05-11
Village Mordi 13 50 68@4494 6 Manju 1/3/2005 BOB, Rupangarh 15 50 10941 7 Balaji 1/3/2005 BOB, Rupangarh 18 50 01@4881 8 Muli 1/1/2006 BOB, Rupangarh
Village Bhadun 11 50 01@1145 1 Balaji 1/1/2005 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 01@9239 2 Shiv Shakti 1/3/2011 BOB, Rupangarh 12 200 01@1880 3 Kamla 10/6/2007 BOB, Rupangarh 14 100 363 4 New Balaji 16-01- GSS, Bhadun 2009 11 100 01@1061 5 Laxmi 10/6/2007 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 6613 6 Jagdamba 1/9/2009 GSS, Bhadun 12 100 213 7 Teja 1/10/2007 GSS, Bhadun 12 100 413 8 Vikas 5/5/2009 GSS, Bhadun 12 200 9 Mahata 10/6/2012 Jyotiba Fule 11 200 10 Adarsh 10/6/2012 Krashak
Village Rupangarh 10 100 10452 1 Jai shri Krishna 1/4/2006 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 9072 2 Swastic 1/1/2004 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 8842 3 Vikas 1/1/2004 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 9071 4 Mahalaxmi 15-08- BOB, Rupangarh 2011 10 100 9836 5 Mamta 15-08-11 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 10181 6 Jai Ma Ambe 18-01- BOB, Rupangarh 2012 10 100 5119 7 Jai Ma Ambe 5/5/2003 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 01@5132 8 Laxmi 5/5/2002 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 01@5133 9 Jyoti 5/6/2002 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 9261 10 Durga 10/7/2003 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 11049 11 Astha 10/1/2004 BOB, Rupangarh 14 100 01@7266 12 Gauri 10/1/2007 BOB, Rupangarh 10 50 01@8748 13 Gayatri 10/1/2009 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 01@9181 14 RadhaKishan 11/5/2012 BOB, Rupangarh 10 100 01@9675 15 Balaji 1/10/2011 BOB, Rupangarh 12 100 01@5609 16 Disa 1/5/2005 BOB, Rupangarh 12 100 01@229 17 Balaji 1/10/2005 BOB, Rupangarh 12 100 01@2288 18 Gunjan 1/8/2008 BOB, Rupangarh 11 100 01@8594 19 Chanchal 15-08- BOB, Rupangarh 2010 13 100 01@8591 20 Priya 15-08- BOB, Rupangarh Darshani 2010 10 50 21 Shiv 1/2/2013 11 100 01@5117 22 Mohit 1/6/2002 BOB, Rupangarh 11 100 01@5430 23 Khushbu 10/3/2004 BOB, Rupangarh 2.14 Ground Water Details & Irrigation Water Status:-Ground Water being the important source of water for the area, every effort needs to maintain or increase it. Irrigation through surface water from Talabs etc. is not possible in the area. Open well & tube wells are used for irrigation purpose. As these sources are not sufficient second crop ( rabi ) is done only in 1% of the area in the absence of winter rains.
TABLE- 28 Available Water Bodies in Project area
S.No. Project villages Anicut Small water Nadi Big Pond bodies /Khadin
1 Roopangarh 2 1 2 2 Sursura 1 3 3 Mordi 1 1 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 1 1 5 Tyod 0 1 6 Joonda 0 0 7 Ralawta 1 1 8 Khatoli 1 0 9 Rahimpura 0 0 10 Mohanpura 0 2 11 Kathoda 0 1 TOTAL 7 10 2 1 Source PRA 2.15 Drinking Water Status
The project area is quite fortunate in terms of drinking water. The main source of drinking water in the project area is hand pump. Bisalpur Pipe line has solved quite a lot the severe problem of drinking water. The other sources are tubewell and open well. In peak summer and dry months people of remote area have to face the challenge to arranging pure and sufficient drinking water. Otherwise Hygienic and potable drinking water is not a major problem in the area.
TABLE – Status of drinking water sources Project Hand pump Open well villages Total Functio Non Dry 6 months 12 ning function months ing Roopangarh 65 57 8 3 8 5 Sursura 60 40 20 0 3 6 Mordi 6 3 3 0 0 2 Ghaswa Ki 5 3 2 0 0 1 Dhani Tyod 21 17 4 0 2 4 Joonda 11 10 1 0 0 1 Ralawta 26 23 3 0 1 3 Khatoli 15 13 2 0 1 1 Rahimpura 18 17 1 0 0 1 Mohanpura 22 19 3 0 0 1 Kathoda 8 6 2 1 0 1 TOTAL 257 208 49 4 15 26 Source PRA
2.16 Water Use Efficiency
Efficient use of water is still required to be educated to the villagers. Very few people take care in utilizing every single drop of water. Hence Water use efficiency is very low in the project area due to flood irrigation practices, water conveyance through earthen water course, water distribution channel, optimum use of water in crops etc. So there is a lot of scope for the improvement of water productivity with farmer friendly technology. Underground pipe line, Drip & Sprinklers needs to be promoted in the area to increase the water use efficiency. As these irrigation systems involve high initial cost, farmers are less willing to install the system.
TABLE Water Use efficiency
Table-2.16 Area (Hectare)
Name of major crop Through water saving Through water Any other (pl. devices( Drip / conserving agronomic Total specify) Sprinklers) practices#
Wheat, Maize, Barley 105 - - 105
2.17 Topography & Slope Details Table mentioned below give the clear impression about the area. The map enclosed reveal about the contour pattern of the project area and slope of the project area. The slope and contour map developed by the PDCORE agency for the project area.
TABLE- Slope pattern of project area Percentage
0-1% 3742 Ha. 1-3% 1643 Ha. 3-5% 260 Ha. 5-10% 73 Ha. More than 10 % 58 Ha.
TABLE- Slope pattern of project area Slope range Area Percentage 0-1% 3742 Ha. 64.84 1-3% 1643 Ha. 28.42 3-5% 260 Ha. 4.39 5-10% 73 Ha. 1.25 More than 10 58 Ha. 1.10 % Source PD Core
2.18 Water Budgeting
WATER BUDGETING OF THE IWMP 13 ( Sursura D ) WATERSHED
Total geographical area of Watershed 5638 Hac
Effective Area 5638 Hac
Rainfall of the Watershed area 389 Mm
Total mansoon rainfall Yield of From % of runoff runoff from (a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall catchment Stranges's to rainfall per hac ( Table cum) In Good Catchment :- 10.50% 420 cum / Hac In Average Catchment :- 7.80% 312 cum / Hac In Bad Catchment :- 5.20% 208 cum / Hac
Area of watershed In Good Catchment = x = 2816 Ha
In Average Catchment = y = 1915 Ha
In Bad Catchment = z = 907 Ha
TABLE- Detail of Micro Irrigation system in Project area Name of villages No of drip No of sprinkler Roopangarh 9 53 Sursura 6 41 Mordi 0 0 Ghaswa Ki Dhani 0 5 Tyod 0 26 Joonda 0 17 Ralawta 0 8 Khatoli 0 1 Rahimpura 0 6 Mohanpura 0 2 Kathoda 2 4 TOTAL 17 163 5638 Hac
Total Runoff available
In Good catchment 1182720 Cum
In Average catchment 597480 Cum
In Poor Catchment 188656 Cum
Total runoff available Cum 1968856 Present storage of the existing water bodies
Storage capacity ( in S.No Water bodies No cum ) 1 Anicut 7 10500 Small water 2 bodies 10 3000 3 Nadi / Khadins 2 2400 4 Big Pond 1 5000 Total storage capacity of existing water bodies = 20900
Following structures are proposed for retain the runoff in the project area
Storage S.No Activity No Unit capacity
1 MMS 14 5600 Cum 2 NADI 9 6750 Cum 3 Anicut 2 1600 Cum Khadin / Farm 4 85 63750 Cum Pond Others (renovation 5 of structures and 0 Cum other small works 77700 cum
Total Storage from existing and proposed 98600 structures Cum % of the available which is 5.01% runoff
2.19 Soil Details: –
The predominant Soil of the project area is classified mainly into dark brown. These soil having poor moisture retention capacity. The key types of soil can be classified as sandy loam. Watershed Development team Members, carry out the PRA exercise in the project village to identify the soil type, soil fertility and understand the soil texture and structure. The types of soil are almost similar in the project area. It is brown color and has characteristics of sandy loam soil.
TABLE- Colour of soil in project area
S.NO Name of Villages Color of Soil Major Soil Classes % of area 1 Roopangarh Brown Sandy loam More than 90 % 2 Sursura Brown Sandy loam ” " " 3 Mordi Brown Sandy loam ” " " 4 Ghaswa Ki Dhani Brown Sandy loam ” " " 5 Tyod Brown Sandy loam ” " " 6 Joonda Brown Sandy loam ” " " 7 Ralawta Brown Sandy loam ” " " 8 Khatoli Brown Sandy loam ” " " 9 Rahimpura Brown Sandy loam ” " " 10 Mohanpura Brown Sandy loam ” " " 11 Kathoda Brown Sandy loam ” " " Source- PRA
TABLE- Depth of soil in Project area
Depth of soil (ft.) Area in hectares <2 ft. 4454 2 ft. to 4 ft. 846 >4 ft. 338 Source: PRA
2.20 Erosion Status- Project area is affected by water & wind erosion. Majority of area is flat so intensity of erosion is not so much high but it is significant due to barren land and land use practice.
TABLE-20 Detail of Soil Erosion
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Average Soil Erosion Water erosion a Sheet 3733 b Rill 1478 8 – 10 tons / c Gully 427 Hac/ Year Sub-Total 5638 Ha Wind erosion 35 ha Total 5638 ha The need is: -
To check land degradation To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water conservation measures To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds To check Faulty agriculture techniques To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks To check Deforestation of steep slopes (For delineated watershed projects) To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to recharge Ground Water structures like Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank Stabilization, Loose stone check Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and Anicuts would be taken up.
CHAPTER THREE
Proposed Development Plan
IWMP 13 project was sanctioned in the year 2011-12. Funds were made available in the year 2012-13 and soon after in the month of June the activities were geared up for the project. Right from the formation of up-sammitties to various committee, various discussions were held at village levels, PRA conducted and specific needs were identified for the socio-economic development along with soil and water conservation activities.
Accordingly Development Plan is proposed, specifically described in the subsequent chapters.
3.1 Entry Point Activity and IEC Activity:-
To build up the rapport of watershed team amongst the villagers EPA works were suggested and with the general consensus in the Gram Sabha as per the budget allocation works were started in the area. To focus on drinking water, sanitation and energy conservation, Kheli Kotha, Shamshan Shed, Vishranti Graha, Snan Ghar and solar street light works have been taken in Gram Sabha. Till writing of the DPR, more than 50% of works are under completion and the rest are likely to be completed by April 2013.
Soon after the inception of the project activities like Nara Lekhan and trainings were started to reach to every single beneficiary of the project area. Workshops were conducted pamphlets distributed in Prashan Gaon ki sang Abhiyan and public representatives were educated with the scheme guidelines.
PIA would provide key focus on the capacity building of various stakeholders in whole phase of the watershed project to build their conceptual, managerial, analytical, technical and operational capabilities. PIA believes that Capacity building is the key mechanism to introduce participatory approaches for planning, implementation and management of watershed activities. A series of training program would be organized for various stakeholders according to changing perspective. Special focus would be provided on follow up of each training program to measure the effectiveness and change in degree of organizational and attitudinal change
Details of EPA Works
S.N Name of Gram Sola Kheli Shamsh Vishra Snan Expenditu o Village Panchayat r Kotha an Shed ti Ghar re Ligh Graha Proposed t 1 Roopangar Ropangarh 4 2 1 1 9.58 lacs h 2 Sursura Sursura 2 3 1 1 7.32 lacs 3 Mordi 1 1 3.84 lacs 4 Ghaswa Ki 1 1 1.13 lacs Dhani 5 Tyod Tyod 2 1 1 4.38 lacs 6 Joonda 1 0.52 lacs 7 Ralawta Ralawata 2 1 2.16 lacs 8 Khatoli Khatoli 1 0.33 lacs 9 Rahimpura 1 1 1 0.60 lacs 10 Mohanpura 1 1 2.74 lacs 11 Kathoda Kathoda 2 1.23 lacs TOTAL 2 16 9 3 5 33.83 lacs
3.2 Capacity Building :-
Table-3.2 List of approved Training Institutes@ for Capacity Building in the project area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Name of Name & Stakehol Name of Full Address Designat Type Accre S. ders the with contact ion of of Area(s) of speciali- ditatio N Training no., website the Instit zation$ n o. Institute & e-mail Head of ute# details Institute
1 PIAs
2 WDTs IGPRS Jaipur, Panchyat training center Ajmer, NGOs empanel by directorate
3 UGs
IGPRS Jaipur,Panchya t training center Ajmer, NGOs empanel by directorate
4 SHGs
5 WCs
IGPRS Jaipur,Panchya t training center Ajmer, NGOs empanel by directorate
6 GPs IGPRS Jaipur,Panchya t training center Ajmer, NGOs empanel by directorate
7 Commu nity 8 PM/SLNA
Capacity building framework would be developed after training need assessment of various stakeholders.
The fund is available at SLNA, DWDC and PIA level for certain activities and would be utilizing as per norms.
Key objectives of Capacity Building Phases are:-
Develop proper conceptual understanding among the various stakeholders about the IWMP. Build up the necessary skill of the official staff and WC members for project planning and implementation and management of project. Develop understanding about the technical issues, environmental issues, productivity enhancement issues and livelihood issues. Build up and enhance the competency of the various stakeholders for sustainability of the project
Capacity Building Plan :-
S.No Title of Training Target group 1 IEC Activities 1.1 Organize Kala Jattha Whole Village community 1.2 Jan Chetna Rally Whole Village community 1.3 Village Meeting Whole Village community 1.4 Organize program with schools School Children 1.5 Any other with mutual understanding with collaboration Needy Villagers 2 Slogan writing 3 Board/Hoardings/Flex 4 Training Program 4.1 Orientation Program on Common Guidelines WDT/WC 4.2 Record Keeping Secretary of WC, Book keeper of SHGs 4.3 Participatory Rural Appraisal WDT, Volunteers 4.4 Technical aspects - Soil and Water conservation WDT, Volunteers, UGs member 4.5 Agriculture Production UG Member and WC member 4.6 Livestock Management WDT, UG and WC 4.7 Livelihoods SHGs and WC 4.8 Income generation activity and Micro UG and SHG Member and WC enterprises member 4.9 Orientation program for SHGs -Concept, need, importance SHGs and WC 4.1 Micro credit and Financial inclusion for SHGs SHGs and WC 4.12 Post project management UG 4.13 Roles and responsibility of SHGs/UG's in Watershed UG and SHG Member 4.14 Bio-energy UG 4.15 Horticulture orchard UG 4.16 Vegetable cultivation UG 4.17 Medicinal and aromatic cultivation UG 4.18 Common property Resources UG 4.19 Usufruct mechanism UG 5 Field Training for Farmers 5.1 Krishak Sangosthi for Kharif and Rabi Crops 5.2 Krishak Sangosthi for Water Productivity 5.3 Krishak Sangosthi on Livestock Management 5.4 Improve practices in Livestock Management 5.5 Organic Farming 5.6 Soil Health 5.7 Improve practices of agriculture 5.8 Gender and equity 5.9 Common property Resources 5.1 Quality fodder and fodder management 6 Consolidation Phase 6.1 Sustainability issues WC , UG and SHG 6.2 Post project management of the assets UG and SHG 6.3 Watershed Development Fund WC , UG and SHG 6.4 Orientation for strengthen the capacity of WC WC Roles and Responsibility of the institutions in 6.5 watershed development SHG, UG, SHG
Resource organization for Capacity building
IGPRS Jaipur PTC Ajmer NGOs empanel by Directorate
Target Purpose Title of training days group WC member To build the capacity Technical training in field of 1 to 5 days training UG of various agriculture , livestock sector depend on type of stakeholders for SHG and watershed development training and smooth execution of WDT project. Training on Institution proposed modules Farmers To enhance the development technical and Training on managerial managerial capacities of the WDT aspects To upgrade the Training on specials areas like knowledge OF SHGs organic fertilizer, soil health and UGs for micro management, medicinal finance and post project management cultivation, good practices in agriculture and livestock
Organizing Training Programmes at Village Level.
Planning for Project Area along with villagers
Construction of Kheli Kotha in village sursura
Construction of Kheli Kotha in Village Kathoda
Nara Lekhan Activity
Table-3.4 Capacity Building activities in the project (PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL) *4% OF TOTAL PROJECT COST.
Total No. of persons to be trained during project No. of Training to be organized during No. of person days to be trained during S. Project no. of period project period project period No Stakeholder person . s 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Tota 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Tota 2012- 2013- 2014 2015 2016 s Total -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 l -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 l 13 14 -15 -16 -17 1 PIAs 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 WDTs 4 4 4 4 4 20 2 2 2 2 2 10 8 8 8 8 8 40 3 UGs 120 145 85 40 30 420 5 15 5 5 4 34 600 2175 425 200 120 3520 4 SHGs 145 165 95 60 50 515 3 11 3 3 4 24 435 1815 285 180 200 2915 5 WCs 50 52 35 25 20 182 1 2 1 1 1 6 50 104 35 25 20 234 6 GPs 550 707 374 144 114 1889 1 1 1 1 1 5 550 707 374 144 114 1889 7 Community 900 900 500 500 450 3250 12 10 8 3 3 36 9000 9000 3000 3000 1500 25500 8 EXPOSURE 25 25 0 0 50 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 25 25 0 0 50 TOUR (INTER 0 STATE) 9 EXPOSURE 0 100 0 100 0 200 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 100 0 100 0 200 TOUR (INTRA STATE) 10 PM/SLNA 50 50 50 50 50 250 2 2 2 2 2 10 50 50 50 50 50 250 11 TOTAL 1820 2149 1169 924 719 6781 28 47 25 20 19 139 10695 13986 4204 3709 2014 34608 PHYSICAL 12 TOTAL 8.47 15.48 6.94 1.26 1.68 33.83 FINANCIAL
Table-3.5 Education & Communication (IEC) activities in the project area (1% of total Project cost.)
Expected Execu Allocation Outcome Allocation in lacs S. out of 1% (may Activity ting No. of total quantify, Project cost 2016- wherever agency 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Total 17 possible)
tyxzg.k {ks= xfrfof/k;kas dks 1- n’kkZrk gqvk POP / CLAY / WOOD / PLASTIC ls cuk 0-10 gqvk ekWMyA 0.33828 0.33828 0.08457 0.08457 0 0.8457
2- MhLiys cksMZs@QysDlh cksMZ
okWy isfUVax&tyxzg.k xfrfof/k;ksa] y{;ks o izkfIr vkfn 3- 0-25 1.585688 0.528563 0 0 0 2.11425 dks n’kkZrh gqbZ A tyxzg.k fodkl laca/kh eqfnzr 4- iEiysVl@fyQ ysVl@pkVZ@iksLVj@vkfnA
Ukkjk ys[ku 5- 0-02 0.15 0.02 0 0 0 0.17 lQyrk dh dgkuh;ksa dh ohfM;ksaxzkQh@QksVksxzkQh@ 6- y?kqfQYe ,oa d`"kdks ls 0-15 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.07 0.3 1.27 lk{kjkrdkj @ okrkZ A fucU/k o okn&fookn izfr;ksfxrk 7- 0 0 0 0 0 0 jsfM;ksa@nwjn’kZu ij okrkZ o 8- foKkiu 0 0 0 0 0 0
9- lkaLd`frd R;kSgkj @ esys vkfn 0-10 ds volj ij iznZ’kuh 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.85
uqDdM+ ukVd 10- 0-1 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.05 0.85
11- dViqryh izn’kZu 0-08 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.07 0 0.67 12- jkf= xks"Bh
13- Hkw laj{k.k lIrkg
14- psruk jSyh
0-20 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.29 1.69 tyxzg.k fodkl dk lans’k nsus 15- okys lkaLd`frd dk;ZØe
d`"kd fnol dk vk;kstu ,oa 16- {ks= Hkze.k fnol dk vk;kstu bR;kfn
dqy 17- 3.424 2.287 1.185 0.875 0.69 8.460
3.6 Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) – WDT team carried out the household survey in the village with involvement of youth of project villages. The household format contains the socio –economic data of the individual family. PRA tools like resource mapping, transect walk, focus group discussion (FGD), community problem analysis (CPA), ranking , semi structured interview and time line were used by the WDT members to know about livelihoods of village, available resources in the project area, main problems, their analysis and optimal solution to resolve the problem. PRA was intended to enable local communities to conduct their own analysis and to plan and take action . PRA involves project staff learning together with villagers about the village. The aim of PRA is to help strengthen the capacity of villagers to plan, make decisions, and to take action towards improving their own situation.
In the common guidelines, more emphasize is given to ensure community participation at every stage of the project. Guidelines also provide community participation at the center of the project and specially mentioned about to ensure the involvement of the backward community, small and marginal famers, land less and women in the planning stage.
TABLE- Detail of PRAs Name of Villages Date of PRA 1 Rupangarh 19/11/12 2 Sursura 27/11/12 3 Mordi 08/12/12 4 Ghaswa ki Dhani 10/12/12 5 Tyod 14/12/12 6 Junda 14/12/12 7 Ralawata 21/12/12 8 Khatoli 28/12/12 9 Rahimpura 03/01/13 10 Mohanpura 07/01/13 11 Kathoda 10/01/13
The WDT members conducted specific sector wise analysis to analysis the situation in agriculture and animal husbandry sector. PRA conducted in the village help to develop the SWOC analysis of the key sub sector of watershed program.
3.7 Scientific Planning-
The PDCORE organization along with PIA, GIS based watershed maps were developed. The images of maps are enclosed with DPR
The five maps developed by the remote application center are
1. Base Map- This map developed on the scale of 1: 10,000 and has information regarding drainage line, cadastral boundary, micro watershed boundary and settlement. 2. Land Use and Land Cover Map- This map have the information of the present land use and land cover of the project villages of the Sursura - D watershed project. 3. Contour Map- the third map is the contour map at 1 m interval 4. Slope Map 5. L Section 6. Key map of drainage and water bodies
3.8 SWOC analysis of Agriculture sub sector - (Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement Development and Growth)
STRENGTH WEAKNESSES 1. Large sector (approximately more 1. Fragmented land holding than 80% H/Hs) involve in 2. Low land holding agriculture and allied sector. 2. Large area (more than 70%) area 3. Still traditional practices used by few covers under arable land. farmers 3. Land suitable to range of cash crops 4. A large area (more than 80%) depend on and orchards and vegetable rain fed farming cultivation 5. Lack of capital for purchase agriculture 4. Location of project villages near to national highway inputs 6. Low productivity 7. Shortage of quality seeds availability as the SRR of the important crops is very
less 8. Lack of awareness on soil health, pesticides and fertilizer pattern. 9. Low level of awareness about improved practices and modern technology at every stage OPPORTUNITY CHALLENGES Scope of increase agriculture 1. Market fluctuation for price rate cropping intensity and productivity 2. Erratic and uncertainty in rainfall through series of integrated efforts. 3. Continuous droughts thrice in a year Rejuvenation and renovation of 4. Ensure the availability of fertilizer and seeds at existing water bodies government units Development of waste land into agriculture/pasture land Scope to increase the area under organic farm
SWOC Analysis of Horticulture and Vegetable sector
STRENGTH WEAKNESSES Willingness of farmers towards crop Low adoption rate of micro irrigation diversification. system Suitable agro climate Lack of awareness about ongoing Market is nearby available schemes for crop diversification Farmer risk taking capacity OPPORTUNITY CHALLENGES Vast untapped potential for WADI and Change the farmers attitude and hybrid vegetable mindset towards crop diversification
SWOC Analysis of Animal Husbandry sector
STRENGTH WEAKNESSES Large number of desi cattle available Low level of awareness regarding livestock development Poor facility available for health services. Non descript local breed available of low milk productivity. Poor feeding management practices Open grazing as common and significantly prevalent practices OPPORTUNITY CHALLENGES Scope to introduce localized breed in Market fluctuations sheep, goat and buffalo. Recurring droughts in project area Potential to use large quantity of cattle Change the mind set of stereo minded waste for bio energy community Develop the capacity of rural youth for primary health treatment
Poverty in project area
Natural Social Factor Economic Political Technical Factor Factor Factor Factor
Land Low literacy Low Negative Land degradation productivity politics, degraded No Hinderance Unsecured the progress institutional Poor soil fund of village Less area relationship health under forest Lack of No alternate Poor awareness source of extension & Over about modern livestock support explofited Poor quality technology mechanism zone at water in Agriculture Large area Lack of Migration in Sector under waste enabling search of land Majority of environment employment Area under Poor rain fed High percentage Infrastructure of small and marginal farmer
3.9 Project Management and Project Period : -
Project Management – As per envisaged in the common guidelines, the Sursura - D watershed project is classified into the three project phases. In view of the expanded scope and expectations under the watershed development program, the project duration could be in the range of four to seven years depending upon the activities of the watershed project. In Sursura - D watershed project, it is designed for 6 years. Project Period- (March 2012 to March 2017)
Phases Duration Duration Preparatory phase 2 Year March 2012 to March 2013 Works Phase 3 Years 6 Months April 2013-Sept 2016 Consolidation Phase 6 Months Oct. 2016 – March 2017
3.10 Reasons for backwardness and issues impending growth The agriculture and livestock sector are key source of livelihood. The major reasons for backwardness of the project area are outlined below:
1. Low crop productivity due low SRR, low fertilizer consumption, gap in technology adoption, moisture stress, handicapped ecology, non-availability of key inputs and failure of extension service to enhance decision making power of the farmers. 2. Lack of awareness about improves practices and modern technology in agriculture and livestock sector. 3. Poor infrastructure development. 4. Small land holding pattern 5. Low water use inefficiency. 6. Low level of literacy and poor socio-economic condition of people 7. Degradation of grazing land and unavailability of green fodder for livestock promotion 8. Indigenous breeds of farm animals with low yielding capacity. 9. Over withdrawal of ground water 10. Lack of available fund to purchase quality input at time of requirement 11. Lack of institutional mechanism for collective efforts 12. Lack of opportunities for alternate employment generation
3.11 Watershed Development Fund-
WDT members make sincere efforts to aware the community about the concept of WDF and properly disseminate the message about the WDF and its norms. A separate project account has been opened in each gram Panchayat of the project area. Community of the project area would contribute this part in form of cash/kind or voluntary level at the time of execution of activity then a sum equal to the monetary value of the voluntary labor and cash collected from the beneficiaries deposit in the WDF account. User’s charges and income from the assets created on common land would also deposit in the WDF account. It is the Department policy that minimum norms decided in the guidelines should be followed but efforts would make to encourage the community for more contribution to enhance the ownership of the community and sustainability of the project however focus is on genuine contribution rather than forced contribution.
Head SC/ST and SMF farmers Others NRM works on private land 5 % 10% NRM works on common land 5% 5% Intensive Farming System 10% 20%
3.12 Watershed Development Works
Watershed work is the important component of the watershed project. 75 % of the total project cost is allocated for the execution of works. Project is looked as holistic approach for development of village so all component is covered in the watershed project. The proposed works are classified into three important components as per envisaged in the common guidelines.
1. Soil and Water Conservation works 2. Productivity Enhancement 3. Livelihood Enhancement
3.12.1 Soil and Water Conservation Works. This is the core component of the IWMP watershed project. 56 % of the total project cost is allocated for this part. Two types of work are covered under this component. It can be classified into
1. Physical measures 2. Vegetative and Agronomic measures
In the detail project report of IWMP, This component is again divided into three sub components A) Arable land development- The proposed works for treatment of private cultivable land is covered under arable land treatment. Earthen bunds and Khadins are the major works taken up. B) Non arable land development – The proposed works for treatment of non arable land or common waste land or non cultivable area is covered under this component. Pasture land development is the Work. C) Drainage line treatment- The works proposed in the drainage line (streams) of the project area is called drainage line treatment. Masonary check dam is the key example
The key purposes of the various measures are
a. To check the erosive velocity of water to reduce the soil erosion in project area. b. To conserve the water for more time in the project village to promote the recharge phenomena. c. To provide the irrigation facility in Rabi season and life saving irrigation in Kharif season also. d. To cover area under vegetation, agro forestry and plantation to develop eco friendly environment. e. To reduce the erosion and conserve in-situ moisture in the field.
3.12.1.1 Arable Land Treatment- Four types of measures have been identified through following participatory approaches and discussion with community for arable land development.
Earthen Bund- This is the most popular soil conservation structure in the country and it is practiced at large scale all over India. The other name of earthen bund is “field bunds”. It would lie along the boundary of the field. Land holding in the project area is very small and it is not possible or feasible to construct contour bund or graded bund in the field. The earthen bund is divided into three types on the basis of the slope of the land and size of field. It is suitable for project area because rainfall is low than 600 mm and soil is favorable. It would help in conserve the water in the field and maintain insitu moisture of the field. The erosion of the field is reduced. The waste weir in the field helps to safely disposal of the excess water from the field. Land records data give us an impression that project communities have land holding from 0.4 ha to10 ha. Slope of more than 90 % area is 1% and 1 -3 % range. WDT team also analysis the rainfall pattern and rainfall intensity of the project area. The design and proposed cross section is enclosed in the design of the earthen bund.
Type of Specification Unit cost(per Area Proposed Earthen Bund ha in Lakhs) in Ha Type=I Slope up to 1% 0.13 1701 Type-II Slope on 2% 0.25 94 Type-III Slope more than 1 and less than 0.18 52 2%
Farm Pond – This structure is constructed where topography of the project area does not lend itself to embankment construction, dugout or excavated pond can be constructed. This is relatively flat area. Since dugout pond can be constructed to expose a minimum water surface area in proportion to volume so they are advantageous where evaporation losses are high and water is scarce. However in context to project area, the farm pond is proposed in the flat land to conserve the rainwater as much as possible in the field.
Sites proposed for farm pond are the place which is at highest natural depression of the field. If site is demanding, then diversion ditch would construct to divert the flow of water towards farm pond. The shape of the farm pond is rectangular and size of the pond depend on the land holding of the farmer, demand of water of farmer , soil type, rainfall pattern and catchment area for proposed farm pond. The proposed cost of the farm pond from the project is 40 and 70 thousands maximum for small and big pond. Remaining cost would contribute from the farmer in case of more investment.
Khadin – A Khadin is an embankment constructed in the farmer’s field to retain water in the field. It is made up from the soil available in the farmer’s field. The key purpose of the Khadin in this project is to conserve the water in the project area to increase the water table. The available moisture in the field also helps to get good crop in the Rabi season also. The Khadin design could vary according to length and height of the structure. In this particular project five type of Khadin is proposed however it may vary according to field condition
Type Unit cost Total structures Type-I 0.22 04 Type-II 0.35 10 Type-III 0.62 16 Type-IV 1.12 41
Stone Wall Terrace – This is the simple structure constructed in the field where stones are easily available in the field and site is demanding to be treated from the stone bund rather than earth due to more slope and soil features. This structure is specially proposed for such type of land which is presently un cultivable and proposed to cover under cultivable area.
Land Reclamation – This activity is proposed for treatment of such lands which are presently uncultivable and can be included under category of cultivable with little bit efforts. Private waste land would be included in this category. Activities like cover the field with good quality silt application, gypsum application, leveling, clean the surface from stone etc. would be plan however it would depend finally on demand of the field. Then same field would cover under agro forestry and horticulture plantation or any other cultivation suitable to the field. The maximum investment for reclamation of field for one farmer is 24 thousands. This activity will help to increase the area under cultivation.
3.12.1.2 Non Arable Land Development – The various SWC treatment measures proposed for development of non arable land of project area are described below
Intergraded Agro Forestry and Pasture Development Model- This activity is planned under non arable land development and planned for common land of project area. Land of size 10 ha to 20 ha has been identified in each 5 Gram Panchayats for implementation of this model. The proposed activities for this model are listed below
1. Contour trenches (Continuous or staggered trench ) to conserve moisture in the field and to reduce the erosion 2. Agro forestry plantation of the suitable tree species to develop eco environment and humus in the soil and solve the fuel problem in long term. Suitable tree like Desi Babool, Neem , Sheeshum , Karanj etc would be planted. 3. Grass land management- Choice of suitable grass to the area and it’s over seeding. to save from erosion and provide the fodder to the village livestock during critical time. 4. Fencing – ditch cum bund fencing or stone fencing is required. However beneficiaries will be motivated for social fencing, in addition, for successful pasture program. 5. Structures like gully plug, LSCD, nala bund to reduce and check the velocity of water and conserve the water to maintain moisture in the field. 6. Structure like Nadi for storage of water in Non-arable areas. 7. If needed minor masonry water tank to provide the water for plantation in critical period. 8. Horticulture plantation in the patch of the area.
If PIA would not feel confident to cover the area for the above activity in a holistic manner than individual activity would be implement in the non arable area like agro forestry, road side plantation, horticulture orchard, trenches, CVH and Nadi etc.
Staggered Trench - This is one of the important practices to intercept the runoff. In this system, trench is excavated along the contour in a uniform level across the land slope on the top part of the catchment and the waste land of the project area. Staggered trench is proposed here. The dimension is given in the design but it can be changed as per condition of site.
Agro Forestry Plantation- Few patches in the project area on common land would develop as agro forestry plantation. The propose size of patch is upto 5 ha. The plants suitable to project area like Sheeshum, Neem, Desi Babool, Bamboo, Khejri would be planted.
Botanical Park- It is proposed nearby temple or any public place where whole community village agreed. The tentative area of the park would be around 0.3 to 0.4 Ha. In the park, activities like grass land, trenches, nursery, fencing, plantation and flower cultivation would be proposed. Two such sites have been proposed in the plan. 3.12.1.3 Drainage Line Treatment – This is the most important component of the works. However, in project area, there are deep drainage line are found only in few villages due to comparatively gentle slope. WDT technical carried out the technical survey L section of the important drainage line and identified the important sites for the masonry check dam. Cross section of every individual site has been carried out and design and estimate prepared accordingly.
Loose Stone Check Dam (LSCD) – This is the structure constructed in the drain of the project area to check the velocity of the water. This structure can be constructing from the available fair size stone. This is dry stone masonry structure so workmanship of the work is very important. This is the structure which is very important for the gully which is steep and broad. The size and shape of the LSCD is depending on the condition of gully and size of available stone. These structures are built in series in the drain and distance between two consecutive structures depends on the grade of the drain.
PUCCA CHECK DAM – This is weir structure construct in the big drain for control of the gully. It is a permanent structure and the main purpose of this structure is to provide the irrigation to the farmer’s field. L section and Cross section survey of the selected location has been carried out. Technical design with four stability checks prepared for each masonary structure.
Minor Masonry structure – This is the small weir structure constructed across the nala in the low catchment area. In this structure, only head wall and extension wall along with apron is constructed. The structure is suitable only in low catchment area and height up to 1.2 m. These structures are proposed in second and third stream nalla with minor modification of the design of anicut.
3.12.2 Productivity Enhancement - This is the second most important component of the watershed project. The key purpose of this component is to enhance the productivity of integrated Farming System. This system comprises of Agriculture, Horticulture, Vegetable, Animal Husbandry, Dairy etc in our project area.
The key objectives of the productivity enhancement component are :-
1) More income from farming system in limited land holding 2) Optimum use of available resources with farmer for more income 3) Assured income for long term 4) Productivity enhancement 5) Awareness on crop diversification 6) Water productivity Comprehensive Package to Farmer – This is the model working on the same concept and give the message about improve practices in agriculture. All necessary input and technology from field preparation to market would provide from the WDT agriculture to the farmer to enhance the productivity. An optimum quantity of fertilizer, pesticides and balance proportion of all necessary input will be given in the demonstration. This demonstration will also address about water productivity. Participatory Varietal Selection- This activity is proposed in the project area with the purpose to make the project area self seed reliance and achieve seed security. Farmer will develop the suitable seed of the certified variety in their own field in close observation of the WDT member’s team. It will help in increase the area of local specific breeding seed and increases the SRR of the main crops. The demonstration of crops like Moong, Maize, Jowar, Bajra, Gram and wheat would be distribute for size of 0.4 ha per farmer. The cost of per demonstration is five thousands only. Orchard Cultivation – The key purpose of this model is to attract project farmers towards horticulture cultivation. Few farmers who fulfill the criteria for successful model would be selected for demonstration of horticulture orchard. This is a model in 1 acre area depend on the availability of land holding with the farmer. Drip irrigation is proposed in the model and all other necessary inputs will also be given with the plants along with latest improved technology. The selection of species of fruits would be mutually decided along with support from horticulture department. . Kitchen Gardening- In this activity, it is proposed to distribute good variety vegetable seeds to the interested individual to grow nearby kitchen garden. Protection of plant is the responsibility of the owner of the house. High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model- The purpose of this model is to motivate the farmers to grow high breed vegetables in a small patch of their area so that others can follow. Medicinal Cultivation- Few demonstrations in the project area will be developed to promote medicinal cultivation. Demonstration of Aashwagandha, alovera, Safed musli etc will be developed in the project area with the farmers those have additional land for cultivation. Vermi compost: Vermi compost is organic manure (bio fertilizer) produced as the vermi compost by earth worm biological waste material; plant residues. This compost is an odorless, clean, organic material containing adequate quantities of N,P,K, and several micronutrients essential for plant growth. Vermi compost is a preferred nutrient source for organic farming. It is eco-friendly, non-toxic, consumes low energy input for composting and is a recycled biological product. A maximum support of Rs. 20,000 would be provided from the project for shed house. Approximately 10-12 units will be installed within the shed.
Livestock Management- Primary health camps – In the villages in the season with collaboration of veterinary department Establish A.I units in the project area with necessary equipment like container, arrangement of sewmen and needle. A young para professional would be trained for intensive training of 3 to 6 months with BAIF. Provision of Improve Breed Cattle- Murrah for buffalo and Gir for Cow. Demonstration showing about nutritious and improve feeding practices of feed for milch animal. Demonstration of improved forage crops. Construction of Pashu Naad for improving feeding practice of management. One model in each project village with one farmer who is progressive and have a number of milch animal. Establish Travis in project villages for treatment of cattle.
3.12.3 Livelihood Enhancement - This is third most important component of the IWMP watershed project. This component aims to maximize the utilization of potential generated by watershed activities and creation of sustainable livelihoods and enhanced incomes for households within the watershed area. This will facilitate inclusiveness through enhanced livelihood opportunities for the poor through investment into assets, improvements in productivity and income, and access of the poor to common resources and benefits and augment the livelihood strategy at household level. It is envisaged in the guidelines that members of these families should become the member of SHGs and these SHGs will prepare the livelihood action plan for the livelihood enhancement of the SHGs members in a long term manner. The propose activities of the SHGs could be both in farm sector or non farm sector.
In the project area many activities are suggested for the livelihood enhancement of the poor families of the project area. It would certainly help in increase in their annual income and generate additional fund to the family. SHGs can undertake any permissible activity jointly as a group or the group may decide to support individual(s) for the activities under the umbrella of the main SHG. In case of individual support under the SHGs, the individuals will be account table to the main SHG for finances and performance.
3.13.1 Special projects
The proposed special projects for the livelihood enhancement manage by SHGs and federations are given below.
Project on Fodder Bank-
Introduction - Availability of adequate quality feed and fodder is of primary importance for development of livestock in the region. Occurrence of drought is not a new phenomenon for Rajasthan. Due to deficit rainfall leading to drought like situation in region results in lower crop production / crop failure leading to considerable shortage of livestock feed resources in the region. Since the frequency of drought in the region has been increasing in the recent years, livestock owners have been facing acute shortage of even dry fodder. During years of drought there is acute shortage of dry fodder; even where available the prices are very high and livestock farmers of the region who are mostly resource poor are not in a position to afford. During such situations there is considerable reduction in production of livestock products.Migration of livestock from the region and consequently reduced livelihood opportunities especially the weaker section of the society.
It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and water or limited availability at prices, which are beyond the reach of most of the persons. As a result the poor are forced to let go their animals, which eventually die of starvation, leading to colossal loss of income generating assets of the poor and animal wealth of the state. Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices during the months of scarcity. In the above context it is essential for giving high priority for ensuring availability of enough livestock forage on a continuous basis especially during drought years. One of the viable strategies for achieving this is to establish “Fodder Banks” at strategic locations in the project area and utilize the stored material for supply to places of deficit. This would help in overcoming the problem of reduced production of livestock products during years of deficit and ensure sustained livestock farming throughout. The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide fodder for livestock sector.” It provides a wide range of animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good and sustainable sources of income in many areas
A SHG of 5 to 15 persons, comprising both women and men, may be formed out of BPL families with due attention also paid to ensure that the group is broad-based, with persons from all castes and religions present in the village. SHGs would produce fodder on the common land and may take land on lease from the Gram Panchayat.
Objective of a fodder bank: 1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation. 2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in association with dairy co- operatives.
Expected Benefits The importance of a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in the village especially in drought condition. Facility to the poor for sale and purchase of fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions at the city market. Availability of fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices. Reduced distress sale of cattle due to non –availability and / or non affordability of fodder. Income to the SHGs members from benefits to SHGs and increase in productivity of milch animal. Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage of fodder. 3.13.2 Seed Bank-
The concept of ‘village based seed bank’, (VBSB) which advocates village self-sufficiency in production and distribution of quality seeds, is fast gaining ground. Many attempts are on to revive the age-old concept of seed self-sufficiency. Seed villages or village seed banks operate with utmost transparency, mutual trust and social responsibility of the seed farmer towards his fellow farmers, and under peer supervision. Though this is not an entirely new concept to villagers, it is being promoted to reduce their dependence on external inputs. SHGs would Implementing the seed village concept in project villages started with reconnaissance survey undertake to assess the ground situation and ascertain the demand for seeds and understand the existing seed systems.
Steps of Seed Bank is – 1) Distributing breeder/founder seed to the farmers under participatory crop varietal selection of different crops varieties to the interested farmers by following participatory approaches in facilitation of the organization. 2) Selection of variety of seed bank after assessing the result and participatory discussion with the farmers. 3) Selection of voluntary farmers willing to part of the seed bank SHGs. 4) On farm training on Seed production techniques , INM,IPM, soil health and other issues. 5) Seed production of selected different crops varieties. 6) Procurement by the SHGs. 7) Distributing to the other interested farmers. 8) Certification process of seed in second year. 9) Storage of seed at right place. 10) Marketing of seed after consumption at village level. 11) Multiplication of seed. 12) Self reliance seed village.
Individual Farmer
Seed Production
Seed Storage
Seed Distribution
Expected Benefits- Availability of improved varieties seed in sufficient quantity within the village. Assured and timely supply of seed. Decentralized seed production. Availability of improved variety seed at low price. Improved seed delivery system to resource-poor farmers. Reduced dependence on external seed sources and hence an effective measure to curb spurious seed trade. Encourages village level trade and improves village economy. Scope for farmer’s participatory varietal selection.
3.13.3 Breed Improvement – Introduction - India has a very rich reservoir of genetic diversity and possesses some of the best breeds of cattle and buffaloes in the world. The country’s population of 218.8 cattle accounts for 17% of the total world population of cattle. In this age of competitive world, a family cannot meet all its requirements from a sole occupation like agriculture which is almost a loss-making enterprise at the present context. Small land holding famers land in rainfed condition does not provide the opportunity to the farmer to get good income from the agriculture. In such context, it is necessary to provide subsidiary source of income sources of income generation to the peasant communities which are complementary to agriculture and easy to manage without many technicalities.
Dairy could be considered as a viable Income Generation Activity (IGA) for the project area but in present time productivity of the animal is comparatively low and farmers knowledge and practice of livestock management is not very encouraging. In project area almost every farmer has cattle but majority of cattle population is desi, so breed improvement in the project area will surely help in improve the productivity result in enhance of income of the family so in the watershed project, it is proposed to provide one Cow of Gir and One Buffalo of Murrah breed to the SHG.
Objectives
Improve the milk productivity Improve the feeding practices of livestock management. Generate the additional source of income in the family
SHG would be fully responsible for the management of the project. SHG would identify the one experience member from the village to look after of the milch animal. He would invest the money on cattle rearing and charge for the cross breed of their local indigenous low yield animal mutually decide in the SHG meeting from the village community. The next upgraded/crossbred progeny with an improved genetic make up will have better milk yielding capacity. One Integrated Livestock Development Centre at one gram Panchayat head quarter covers all the 17 villages falling within an area of 15 - 18 Kms from its location. One programme operator, called 'Gopal' is posted at each of these centers. To ensure the success of this programme, mass castration camps will organized in all the villages to castrate the local stray bulls in order to avoid indiscriminate breeding.
Watershed treatment plan
Introduction
The unit of action plan is at gram panchayat as envisaged in the guideline and instructed by SLNA. PIA is taking care to develop the plan after adopting latest change in the percentage wise allocation of budget.
The watershed treatment plan is prepared for five years i.e 2012-13 to 2016-17. Implementation phase is planned for only four years i.e from year 2013-14 to 2016-17 so gram panchayat wise action plan of works component has developed only for three years.
300.00 PIA
250.00 NRM 200.00 Production System 150.00 Livelihood System 100.00
50.00
0.00 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fig. YEAR WISE EXPENDITURE IN DIFFERENT HEADS OF THE PROJECTS.
Figure shows that maximum fund would invest in the third year i.e 2014-15 and minimum in last year 2016-17. Second year 2013-14 is also the key year for the project.
350.00
300.00 Livelihood System 250.00
200.00 Production System
150.00 NRM 100.00
50.00 PIA
0.00
Fig : Panchayat wise expenditure in various heads
Convergence – PIA would make sincere efforts for holistic development of the project area so PIA would do dedicated efforts to convergence with the various departments like agriculture department, horticulture department and NREGA. PIA also doing efforts to get the support from health department, social and welfare department, NBA, Dairy etc.
IWMP 13, Ajmer
Format-1 Physical Target (Watershed Works) Name of Project- IWMP-13/2011-12(Ajmer) Block-Silora Distt.-Ajmer
Unit Total Financial yearwise physical Target (ha/nos/Rm Name of Head Name of activity Name of Subactivity Target t/Cubic (Quantity metre 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 13 14 15 16 2016-17 1. Water 1.1 Land Development 1.1.1 Afforestation (on wasteland) 11 ha 0 0 7 4 0 development (Productive use) 1.1.2 Afforestation (on total land including ha works wasteland 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1.3 Horticulture (on wasteland 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.1.4 Horticulture (on total land including ha wasteland) 10 0 3 5 2 0 1.1.5 Agriculture (on wasteland) 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.1.6 Agriculture (on total land including ha wasteland 10 0 0 10 0 0 1.1.7 Pasture on (waste land) 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.1.8 Pasture (on total land including ha wasteland 70 0 28 42 0 0 1.1.9 Others on (wasteland) 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.1.10 Others (on total land including wasteland) 2 ha 0 0 2 0 0 1.2 Soil & Moisture 1.2.1 Staggered trenching 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 conservation 1.2.2 Contour bunding 1869 ha 0 435 1014 419 1 1.2.3 Graded bunding 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.2.4 Bench terracing 0 ha 0 0 0 0 0 1.2.5 Others 8 ha 0 0 8 0 0 1.3 Vegetative and 1.3.1 Earthen checks 161.38 Cubic meter 0 0 107.6 53.79 0 Engineering Structure 1.3.2 Brushwood checks Rmt 0 0 0 0 0 1.3.3 Gully plugs 0 Cubic meter 0 0 0 0 0 1.3.4 Loose bolder 781.24 Cubic meter 0 202.06 403.6 0 175.62 1.3.5 Gabion structure 0 Cubic meter 0 0 0 0 0 1.3.6 Others 0 nos 0 0 0 0 0
Physical Targets goi IWMP 13, Ajmer
1.4 Water harvesting 1.4.1 Farm ponds 14 nos 0 0 7 5 2 structure (New created) 1.4.2 Check dams 2 nos 0 0 2 0 0 1.4.3 Nallah bund 0 nos 0 0 0 0 0 1.4.4 Percolation tanks nos 1.4.5 Ground water recharge atructure 71 nos 0 7 41 19 2 1.4.6 Others 14 nos 5 6 3 0 1.5 Water harvesting 1.5.1 Farm ponds nos structure (Renovated) 1.5.2 Check dams 0 nos 1.5.3 Nallah bund nos 1.5.4 Percolation tanks nos 1.5.5 Ground water recharge structure 0 nos 1.5.6 Others 0 nos 1.6 Water harvesting 1.6.1 Farm ponds structure (Storage 5672 Cubic meter 0 2908 2180 584 capacity of new 1.6.2 Check dams 1406.26 Cubic meter 0 1406 0 0 1.6.3 Nallah bund Cubic meter structures) 0 1.6.4 Percolation tanks 0 Cubic meter
1.6.5 Ground water recharge structure 25950 Cubic meter 3050 15250 6750 900 1.6.6 Others 3503.76 Cubic meter 1810 632.8 1061 0 1.7 Water harvesting 1.7.1 Farm ponds Cubic meter structure (Storage 1.7.2 Check dams Cubic meter capacity of renovated 1.7.3 Nallah bunds Cubic meter structures) 1.7.4 Percolation tanks Cubic meter 1.7.5 Ground water recharge structure Cubic meter 1.7.6 Others Cubic meter 2. EPA 2.1 No. of EPA activities 30 nos 20 10 0 0 0 2.2 No. of water extracting unit created nos 3. Institition & 3.1 SHG formation 3.1.1 No. of SHG Capacity (Newely created) 24 nos 24 Building 3.1.2 Total no. of SHGs member nos 3.2 SHG assisted 3.2.1 No. of SHGs assisted nos 3.2.2 Total no. SHGs member nos 3.3 UG Formation 3.3.1 No. of UG nos
Physical Targets goi IWMP 13, Ajmer
3.3 UG Formation 3.3.2 Total no. members of UGs nos 3.4 Formation of 3.4.1 No. of federation nos federation 3.4.2 Total no. of members of federation nos 3.5 Capacity building 3.5.1 No. of training nos 3.5.2 No. of persons trained nos 4. Livelihood 4.1 No. of activities activities for nos the asset-less 4.2 No. of beneficiaries nos 5.persons Production 5.1 Sericulture 5.1.1 No. of activities nos system & 5.1.2 No. of beneficiaries nos micro- 5.2 Beekeeping 5.2.1 No. of activities nos enterprises 5.2.2 No. of beneficiaries nos 5.3 Poultry 5.3.1 No. of activities nos 5.3.2 No. of beneficiaries nos 5.4 Fisheries 5.4.1 No. of activities nos 5.4.2 No. of beneficiaries nos 5.5 Bio-fuel plantation 5.1.1 Area covered ha 5.1.2 No. of beneficiaries nos 5.6 Others 5.6.1 No. of activities 22 nos 0 3 18 22 17 5.6.2 No. of beneficiaries 2079 nos 0 28 600 828 623
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Physical Targets goi IWMP 13, Ajmer
Format-2 Financial Target (Watershed Works) Name of Project- IWMP-13/2011-12(Ajmer) Block-Silora Distt.-Ajmer Amount (Rs. In lakh) Total Name of Head Name of activity Name of Subactivity Financial year Target 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1. Water development 1.1 Land Development works (Productive use) 1.1.1 Afforestation 2.64 0 0 1.2 0.96 0.48 1.1.2 Horticulture 4.10 0 1.23 2.05 0.82 0 1.1.3 Agriculture 2.40 0 0 2.4 0 0 1.1.4 Pasture 74.20 0 0 29.68 44.52 0 1.1.5 Others 5.00 0 0 5 0 0 1.2 Soil & Moisture 1.2.1 Staggered trenching conservation 1.2.2 Contour bunding 260.79 60.53 143.06 57.03 0.18 1.2.3 Graded bunding 0 1.2.4 Bench terracing 0 1.2.5 Others 1.44 0 0 1.44 0 0 1.3 Vegetative and 1.3.1 Earthen checks 28.08 0 0 18.43 9.65 0 Engineering Structure 1.3.2 Brushwood checks 1.3.3 Gully plugs 1.3.4 Loose bolder 8.83 0 2.29 4.56 0 1.98 1.3.5 Gabion structure 1.3.6 Others 1.4 Water harvesting structure 1.4.1 Farm ponds 8.41 0 0 4.32 3.25 0.84 (New created) 1.4.2 Check dams 6.60 0 0 6.6 0 0 1.4.3 Nallah bund 1.4.4 Percolation tanks 1.4.5 Ground water recharge atructure 60.22 0 7.04 35.1 15.84 2.24 1.4.6 Others 10.88 0 5.26 2.64 2.98 0 1.5 Water harvesting structure 1.5.1 Farm ponds (Renovated) 1.5.2 Check dams
Financial Target goi IWMP 13, Ajmer
1.5.3 Nallah bund 1.5.4 Percolation tanks 1.5.5 Ground water recharge structure 1.5.6 Others 2. Administrative cost 2.1 Salary 33.00 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 2.2 Others 51.57 10.31 12.82 14.957 8.242 5.239 3. Monitoring 3.1 Monitoring of projects 8.46 0.85 0.85 2.93 0.84 2.99 4.1 Plan for EPA 4. Entry point Activity 33.83 21.14 12.69 0 0 0 5. Institution & Capacity 5.1 SHG formation Building 5.2 UG formation 5.3 Formation of federation 5.4 Capacity building 42.29 10.16 17.168 8.63 2.951 3.376 5.5 Others 33.83 0.845 0.845 2.93 16.07 13.14 6. DPR 6.1 Preperation of DPR 8.46 5.07 3.38 0 0 0
7. Livelihood activities for 7.1 Plan for livelihood activites the asset-less persons 76.11 0 13.5 25.284 15.68 21.646 8. Production system & 8.1 Sericulture micro- enterprises 8.2 Beekeeping 8.3 Poultry 8.4 Fisheries 8.5 Bio- fuel plantaion 8.6 Others 84.58 0 2.36 25.32 28.74 28.15 TOTAL 845.70 54.98 146.56 343.14 214.17 86.86
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Financial Target goi FINANCIAL PIA Format-3 To be entered at PIA level Finacial Target Projectwise IWMP - 13 Amount (Rs.in Lakh S.No. Head Financial year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 TOTAL 1 Administrative 11.84 13.60 15.09 10.39 8.29 59.20 2 Capacity building 7.742 13.13 6.60 2.26 2.29 32.02 3 Monitoring 0.26 0.26 0.88 0.26 1.01 2.66 4 Preparation of DPR 5.07 3.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.45 5 EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 Evaluation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.68 1.69 TOTAL 24.90 30.37 22.56 13.92 12.26 104.01
FINANCIAL WCDC Format-4 To be entered at WCDC level Finacial Target Projectwise Amount (Rs.in Lakh S.No. Head Financial year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 TOTAL 1 Administrative 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 Capacity building 1.82 2.99 1.55 0.53 0.54 7.43 3 Monitoring 0.43 0.43 1.47 0.43 1.69 4.43 4 Preparation of DPR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 Evaluation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.34 0.84 TOTAL 2.24 3.42 3.02 1.46 2.56 12.70
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora
FINANCIAL WCDC To be entered at WCDC level Finacial Target Projectwise Amount(Rs.in Lakh No. Head Financial year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 Administrative 2 Capacity building 3 Monitoring 4 Preparation of DPR 5 Any other Format-4 Capacity building Plan (PIA level) Format-5 Name of Project- IWMP-13/2011-12(Ajmer) Block-Silora Distt.-Ajmer
No. Head Financial year
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 No. of trainings planned 27 46 24 24 19 2 No. of persons to be trained 1750 2750 1145 825 620
Capacity building plan (WCDC) Format-6 Name of Project- IWMP-13/2011-12(Ajmer) Block-Silora Distt.-Ajmer Amount(Rs.in Lakh No. Head Financial year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 No. of trainings planned 2 2 2 2 2 2 No. of persons to be trained 50 50 50 50 50 IWMP 13, Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- Sursura (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 30.72 6.14 7.059 7.831 5.391 4.300 30.72 Monitoring 1% 3.07 0.31 0.31 1.064 0.308 1.086 3.07 Evaluation 1% 3.07 0.31 0.31 1.064 0.308 1.086 3.07 EPA 4% 12.29 7.68 4.61 12.29 I & CB 5% 15.36 3.69 6.236 3.13344 1.072 1.226 15.36 DPR 1% 3.07 1.84 1.23 3.07 Total (A) 22% 67.58 19.97 19.75 13.092 7.079 7.699 67.59 (B) Natural resource management(56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 521 0.13 68.77 130 17.16 350 46.20 41 5.412 0 0 521 68.77 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 55 0.25 13.585 10 2.47 45 11.12 0 0 0 0 55 13.59 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 26 0.18 4.706 5 0.905 15 2.72 6 1.086 0 0 26 4.71 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 0 0.42 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 5 0.65 3.25 0 0 2 1.30 3 1.95 0 0 5 3.25 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 2 0.22 0.44 0 0 1 0.22 1 0.22 0 0 2 0.44 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 5 0.35 1.75 1 0.35 3 1.05 1 0.35 0 0 5 1.75 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 6 0.62 3.72 1 0.62 3 1.86 2 1.24 0 0 6 3.72 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 18 1.12 20.16 2 2.24 10 11.20 4 4.48 2 2.24 18 20.16 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 5 0.18 0.90 0 0 5 0.90 0 0 0 0 5 0.90 Land reclamation and Ha 3 0.24 0 0 3 0.72 0 0 0 3 0.72 development 0.72 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry Ha 25 1.06 0 0 10 10.6 15 15.9 0 0 25 26.50 and Pasture Model 26.50 Horticulture plantation on Ha 3 0.41 1 0.41 2 0.82 0 0 0 0 3 1.23 common land 1.23 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 8 0.16 1.312 0 0.00 5 0.82 3 0.492 0 0 8 1.31 SURSURA IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Botanical Park - Land development Administration No 1 2.50 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0 2.50 +all type of plantation 2.50 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 1 2.56 2.56 0 0.00 1 2.56 0 0 0 0 1 2.56 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 1 3.07 3.07 0 0.00 1 3.07 0 0 0 1 3.07 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 1 4.02 4.02 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 4.02 0 0 1 4.02 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 1 4.61 4.61 0 0.00 1 4.61 0 0 0 0 1 4.61 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Ha 3 0.24 0 0.00 2 0.48 1 0.24 0 0 3 0.72 Common land 0.72 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 1 0.70 0.70 1 0.70 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 1 1.58 1.58 1 1.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.58 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 4 0.08 0.32 2 0.16 2 0.16 0 0 0 0 4 0.32 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 5 0.13 0.65 2 0.26 3 0.39 0 0 0 0 5 0.65 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 3 0.17 0.51 3 0.51 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 3 0.51 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 1 3.30 3.30 0 0 1 3.30 0 0 0 0 1 3.30 Total (B) 172.03 27.37 107.030 35.390 2.240 172.03 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 No 12 0.09 4 0.38 4 0.38 4 0.376 0 0 12 1.13 Ha 1.128 Drip Irrigation Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 1 0.24 1 0.24 0 0 2 0.48 Sprinkler Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 0 2 0.48 2 0.48 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 10 0.05 0.00 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 10 0.50 cultivation 0.50
Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , No 125 0.05 0.00 6 0.30 6 0.3 113 5.65 125 6.25 home stead plantation 6.25 SURSURA IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration Demonstration of Vermi No 10 0.20 0.00 0.00 3 0.6 7 1.4 10 2.00 Composting Model 2.00 NADEP composting No 15 0.10 1.50 0.00 1 0.10 0 14 1.4 15 1.50
Participartory Varietal Selection- No 200 0.04 10 0.40 20 0.80 8 0.32 162 6.48 200 8.00 Crops Demonstration 8.00 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation No 7 0.05 0.00 2 0.10 5 0.25 0 0 7 0.35 Model 0.35 Demonstration of Model of No 10 0.05 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 0 0 10 0.50 Medicinal cultivation 0.50
Demonstration of nutritious No 4 0.05 0.00 0.00 4 0.2 0 0 4 0.20 feeding management 0.20
No 7 0.05 0.00 0.00 4 0.2 3 0.15 7 0.35 Demonstration of Forage crops 0.35 Developing Soil health card of No 300 0.0003 0.00 0.00 200 0.06 100 0.03 300 0.09 farmers 0.09 No 15 0.10 0.00 0.00 2 0.2 13 1.3 15 1.50 Tool kit for skilled labour 1.50 Livestocks
No 2 0.10 0.00 2 0.20 0 0 0 2 0.20 Primary health kit for livestock 0.20 Breed Improvement - Natural No 2 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 1 0.75 2 1.50 method 1.5 Goatry model(4+1) No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 2 0.48 0 0 2 0.48 Organize Veternery Camps No 8 0.20 1.60 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.4 2 0.4 8 1.60
Establish Travis in the village No 2 0.08 0.16 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 0 0 2 0.16
Pashu Naad with drainage Model No 10 0.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 9 1.08 10 1.20 for group of animals 1.20
Pashu Naad - Basic No 45 0.05 2.25 0.00 15 0.75 5 0.25 25 1.25 45 2.25 Sub Total (B) 30.72 1.18 3.516 5.406 20.620 30.72
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund No 69 0.25 5 1.25 13 3.25 9 2.4 42 10.50 69 17.40 for SHGs 17.40 SURSURA IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration Revolving Fund to enterprising No 11 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.75 8 2.00 11 2.75 individual(maximum 10 %) 2.75 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs No 5 1.50 1 1.50 1 1.50 0 0 3 4.50 5 7.50 individual (maximum 30 % ) 7.50 Total (D ) 27.65 2.75 4.750 3.150 17.000 27.65 (E) Consolidation ( 3 % ) 9.22 5.530 3.686 9.216 Grand Total 307.19 51.04 128.39 56.56 51.25 307.20
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
SURSURA IWMP 13, Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- Rupangarh (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 23.94 4.79 5.501 6.102 4.201 3.351 23.94 Monitoring 1% 2.39 0.24 0.24 0.829 0.240 0.846 2.40 Evaluation 1% 2.39 0.24 0.24 0.829 0.240 0.846 2.40 EPA 4% 9.58 5.99 3.59 9.58 I & CB 5% 11.97 2.88 4.860 2.44188 0.836 0.956 11.97 DPR 1% 2.39 1.44 0.96 2.39 Total (A) 22% 52.67 15.56 15.39 10.203 5.517 6.000 52.67 (B) Natural resource management(56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 452 0.13 59.66 125 16.5 243 32.08 84 11.088 0 0 452 59.66 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 25 0.25 6.175 5 1.235 15 3.71 5 1.235 0 0 25 6.18 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 15 0.18 2.715 5 0.905 5 0.91 5 0.905 0 0 15 2.72 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 2 0.42 0.84 0 0 0.00 0 2 0.84 2 0.84 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 4 0.65 2.60 0 0 2 1.30 2 1.3 0 0 4 2.60 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 1 0.22 0.22 0 0 1 0.22 0 0 0 0 1 0.22 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 3 0.35 1.05 1 0.35 1 0.35 1 0.35 0 0 3 1.05 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 5 0.62 3.10 1 0.62 2 1.24 2 1.24 0 0 5 3.10 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 14 1.12 15.68 2 2.24 10 11.20 2 2.24 0 0 14 15.68 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 3 0.18 0.54 0 0 3 0.54 0 0 0 0 3 0.54 Land reclamation and development Ha 3 0.24 0 0 3 0.72 0 0 0 3 0.72 0.72 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 18 1.06 0 0 8 8.48 10 10.6 0 0 18 19.08 Pasture Model 19.08 Ha 5 0.41 1 0.41 2 0.82 2 0.82 0 0 5 2.05 Horticulture plantation on common land 2.05 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 5 0.16 0.82 0 0.00 5 0.82 0 0 0 0 5 0.82 Botanical Park - Land development +all type No 1 2.50 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0 2.50 of plantation 2.50
Rupangarh IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 1 2.56 2.56 0 0.00 1 2.56 0 0 0 0 1 2.56 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 1 3.07 3.07 0 0.00 1 3.07 0 0 0 1 3.07 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 0 4.02 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 0 4.61 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Common Ha 5 0.24 0 0.00 4 0.96 1 0.24 0 0 5 1.20 land 1.20 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 1 0.70 0.70 1 0.70 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 1 1.58 1.58 1 1.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.58 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 10 0.08 0.80 2 0.16 2 0.16 0 0 6 0.48 10 0.80 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 10 0.13 1.30 2 0.26 3 0.39 0 0 5 0.65 10 1.30 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 8 0.17 1.36 3 0.51 0 0.00 0 0 5 0.85 8 1.36 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 1 3.30 3.30 0 0 1 3.30 0 0 0 0 1 3.30 Total (B) 134.06 25.47 75.756 30.018 2.82 134.06 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model No 12 0.09 1.128 4 0.38 4 0.38 4 0.381 0 0 12 1.13 Drip Irrigation Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 0 0 1 0.24 Sprinkler Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0 1 0.24 1 0.24 Demonstration of Flower / Spice cultivation No 5 0.05 0.25 0.00 0.00 5 0.25 0 0 5 0.25
Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home stead No 80 0.05 0.00 20 1.00 60 3 0 0 80 4.00 plantation 4.00 Demonstration of Vermi Composting Model No 8 0.20 1.60 0.00 5 1.00 3 0.6 0 0 8 1.60 NADEP composting No 10 0.10 1.00 0.00 5 0.50 5 0.5 0 0 10 1.00
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops No 161 0.04 10 0.40 120 4.80 31 1.24 0 0 161 6.44 Demonstration 6.44 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model No 5 0.05 0.25 0.00 2 0.10 3 0.15 0 0 5 0.25 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal No 10 0.05 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 0 0 10 0.50 cultivation 0.50 Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 4 0.05 0.00 0.00 4 0.2 0 0 4 0.20 management 0.20 Rupangarh IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Demonstration of Forage crops No 7 0.05 0.35 0.00 0.00 4 0.2 3 0.15 7 0.35 Developing Soil health card of farmers No 304 0.0003 0.0912 0.00 0.00 200 0.06 104 0.0312 304 0.09 Tool kit for skilled labour No 20 0.10 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.2 18 1.8 20 2.00 Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 2 0.20 0 0 0 2 0.20 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0 0 1 0.75 Goatry model(4+1) No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 2 0.48 0 0 2 0.48 Organize Veternery Camps No 8 0.20 1.60 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.4 2 0.4 8 1.60 Establish Travis in the village No 2 0.08 0.16 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 0 0 2 0.16 Pashu Naad with drainage Model for No 10 0.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 9 1.08 10 1.20 group of animals 1.20 Pashu Naad - Basic No 25 0.05 1.25 0.00 15 0.75 5 0.25 5 0.25 25 1.25 Sub Total (B) 23.93 1.18 9.616 9.191 3.951 23.93 ( D) Livelihood System 9%
No 52 0.25 5 1.25 23 5.75 12 3.00 12 3.15 52 13.15 Seed Money and revolving fund for SHGs 13.15
Revolving Fund to enterprising No 9 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.90 6 1.50 9 2.40 individual(maximum 10 %) 2.40 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual (maximum 30 No 4 1.50 1 1.50 1 1.50 2 3.00 0 0.00 4 6.00 % ) 6.00 Total (D ) 21.55 2.75 7.250 6.900 4.646 21.55 (E) Consolidation ( 3 % ) 7.18 4.31 2.87 7.18 Grand Total 239.39 44.79 102.82 55.94 20.29 239.40
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Rupangarh IWMP 13 ,Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- Bhadun (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 3.08 0.61 0.707 0.784 0.540 0.430 3.08 Monitoring 1% 0.31 0.03 0.03 0.107 0.031 0.109 0.31 Evaluation 1% 0.31 0.03 0.03 0.107 0.031 0.109 0.31 EPA 4% 1.23 0.77 0.46 1.23 I & CB 5% 1.54 0.37 0.624 0.31365 0.107 0.123 1.54 DPR 1% 0.31 0.18 0.12 0.31 Total (A) 22% 6.77 2.00 1.98 1.311 0.709 0.771 6.77 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund 2 Type-1 ( 0.86 m ) HA 81 0.13 10.69 60 7.92 21 2.77 0 0 0 0 81 10.69 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 1 0.25 0.247 1 0.247 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 0 0.18 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 0 0.42 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 0 0.65 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 1 0.22 0.22 0 0 1 0.22 0 0 0 0 1 0.22 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 0 0.35 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 1 0.62 0.62 1 0.62 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 0.62 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 0 1.12 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 0 0.18 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Land reclamation and development Ha 0 0.24 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 0 1.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pasture Model 0.00 Horticulture plantation on common land Ha 1 0.41 0.41 1 0.41 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 0.41 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 2 0.16 0.328 0 0.00 2 0.33 0 0 0 0 2 0.33 Botanical Park - Land development +all type of No 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 plantation 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 1 2.56 2.56 0 0.00 1 2.56 0 0 0 0 1 2.56 Bhadun IWMP 13 ,Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 0 3.07 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 0 4.02 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 0 4.61 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Common Ha 1 0.24 0 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 0 0 1 0.24 land 0.24 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 1 0.70 0.70 1 0.70 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 0 1.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 0 0.08 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 3 0.13 0.39 2 0.26 1 0.13 0 0 0 0 3 0.39 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 1 0.17 0.17 1 0.17 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 0.17 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 1 0.20 0.2 0.00 1 0.20 0 0 0 1 0.20 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 0 3.30 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Total (B) 17.22 10.33 6.890 0.000 0.00 17.22 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model No 0 0.094 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Drip Irrigation Model No 0 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Sprinkler Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 cultivation 0.00 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home No 10 0.05 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 0 0 10 0.50 stead plantation 0.50 Demonstration of Vermi Composting No 2 0.20 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.2 0 0 2 0.40 Model 0.40 NADEP composting No 0 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops No 25 0.04 0 0.00 15 0.60 10 0.40 0 0 25 1.00 Demonstration 1.00
No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model 0 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 cultivation 0.00 Bhadun IWMP 13 ,Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 management 0.00 Demonstration of Forage crops No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Developing Soil health card of farmers No 0 0.0003 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Tool kit for skilled labour No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 2 0.2 0 0 2 0.20 Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No 0 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00
No 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Breed Improvement - Natural method 0.00 Goatry model(4+1) No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 Organize Veternery Camps No 2 0.20 0.40 0 0.00 2 0.40 0 0 0 0 2 0.40 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.08 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model for No 0 0.12 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 group of animals 0.00 Pashu Naad - Basic No 2 0.05 0.10 0.00 2 0.10 0 0 0 0 2 0.10 Sub Total (B) 3.08 0.00 1.550 1.530 0.000 3.08
( D) Livelihood System 9%
No 7 0.25 5 1.25 2 0.50 0 0 0 0.00 7 1.75 Seed Money and revolving fund for SHGs 1.75 Revolving Fund to enterprising No 4 0.25 2 0.50 2 0.50 0 0 0 0.00 4 1.00 individual(maximum 10 %) 1.00 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual (maximum No 0 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 30 % ) 0.00 Total (D ) 2.75 1.75 1.000 0.000 0.000 2.75 (E) Consolidation 3 % 0.92 0.55 0.37 0.92 Grand Total 30.73 14.05 10.75 2.79 1.14 30.74
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Bhadun IWMP 13, Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- Ralawata (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 5.40 1.08 1.241 1.376 0.948 0.756 5.40 Monitoring 1% 0.54 0.05 0.05 0.187 0.054 0.191 0.54 Evaluation 1% 0.54 0.05 0.05 0.187 0.054 0.191 0.54 EPA 4% 2.16 1.35 0.81 2.16 I & CB 5% 2.70 0.65 1.096 0.5508 0.188 0.216 2.70 DPR 1% 0.54 0.32 0.22 0.54 Total (A) 22% 11.88 3.51 3.47 2.301 1.244 1.353 11.88 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 197 0.13 26.00 25 3.3 80 10.56 92 12.144 0 0 197 26.00 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 4 0.25 0.988 1 0.247 2 0.49 1 0.247 0 0 4 0.99 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 6 0.18 1.086 3 0.543 3 0.54 0 0 0 0 6 1.09 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 0 0.42 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 0 0.65 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 0 0.22 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 0 0.35 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 0 0.62 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 1 1.12 1.12 0 0 1 1.12 0 0 0 0 1 1.12 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 0 0.18 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Land reclamation and development Ha 0 0.24 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 0 1.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pasture Model 0.00 Ha 0 0.41 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Horticulture plantation on common land 0 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 0 0.16 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Botanical Park - Land development +all type No 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 of plantation 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 0 2.56 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Ralawata IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 0 3.07 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 0 4.02 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 0 4.61 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Common Ha 0 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 land 0.00 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 0 0.70 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 0 1.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 5 0.08 0.40 0 0.00 5 0.40 0 0 0 0 5 0.40 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 0 0.13 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 0 0.17 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 1 0.20 0.2 0.00 1 0.20 0 0 0 1 0.20 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 0 3.30 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Total (B) 30.24 4.09 13.757 12.391 0.00 30.24 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model No 2 0.09 0.188 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 2 0.19 2 0.19 Drip Irrigation Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 0.24 1 0.24 Sprinkler Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 1 0.24 2 0.48
Demonstration of Flower / Spice cultivation No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home stead plantation No 20 0.05 1.00 0.00 5 0.25 10 0.5 5 0.25 20 1.00
Demonstration of Vermi Composting Model No 3 0.20 0.60 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.60 NADEP composting No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 2 0.20 0 0 0 0 2 0.20
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops No 25 0.04 0 0.00 15 0.60 10 0.40 0 0 25 1.00 Demonstration 1.00 No 1 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 1 0.05 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model 0.05 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 cultivation 0.00
Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 management 0.00 Demonstration of Forage crops No 2 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.00 2 0.1 0 0.00 2 0.10 Ralawata IWMP 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Developing Soil health card of farmers No 100 0.0003 0.03 0.00 100 0.03 0 0 0 0 100 0.03 Tool kit for skilled labour No 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 0.00 2 0.2 3 0.3 5 0.50 Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No 0 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00
No 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Breed Improvement - Natural method 0.00 Goatry model(4+1) No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 Organize Veternery Camps No 3 0.20 0.60 0 0.00 2 0.40 0 0 1 0.2 3 0.60 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.08 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model for No 1 0.12 0.00 0.00 0 0 1 0.12 1 0.12 group of animals 0.12 Pashu Naad - Basic No 1 0.05 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 Sub Total (B) 5.40 0.00 1.730 1.930 1.738 5.40
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund for No 11 0.25 5 1.25 5 1.25 1 0.36 0 0.00 11 2.86 SHGs 2.86 Revolving Fund to enterprising No 2 0.25 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 0.50 individual(maximum 10 %) 0.50 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual No 1 1.50 0 0.00 1 1.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1.50 (maximum 30 % ) 1.50 Total (D ) 4.86 1.75 2.750 0.360 0.000 4.86 (E) Consolidation 3 % 1.62 0.97 0.65 1.62 Grand Total 54.00 9.31 20.54 16.90 3.74 54.00
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Ralawata IWMp 13, Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- TYOD (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 12.24 2.45 2.813 3.120 2.148 1.713 12.24 Monitoring 1% 1.22 0.12 0.12 0.424 0.123 0.433 1.22 Evaluation 1% 1.22 0.12 0.12 0.424 0.123 0.433 1.22 EPA 4% 4.90 3.06 1.84 4.90 I & CB 5% 6.12 1.47 2.485 1.24848 0.427 0.489 6.12 DPR 1% 1.22 0.73 0.49 1.22 Total (A) 22% 26.93 7.96 7.87 5.216 2.821 3.068 26.93 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 260 0.13 34.32 30 3.9603 90 11.88 140 18.4814 0 0 260 34.32 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 6 0.25 1.482 2 0.494 2 0.49 2 0.494 0 0 6 1.48 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 3 0.18 0.543 1 0.181 2 0.36 0 0 0 0 3 0.54 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 1 0.42 0.42 0 0 1 0.42 0 0 0 1 0.42 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 1 0.65 0.65 0 0 1 0.65 0 0 0 0 1 0.65 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 0 0.22 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 0 1 0.35 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 2 0.62 1.24 0 0 1 0.62 1 0.62 0 0 2 1.24 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 4 1.12 4.48 0 0 2 2.24 2 2.24 0 0 4 4.48 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 0 0.18 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Land reclamation and development Ha 2 0.24 0 0 2 0.48 0 0 0 2 0.48 0.48 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 15 1.06 0 0 5 5.3 10 10.6 0 0 15 15.90 Pasture Model 15.90 Horticulture plantation on common land Ha 1 0.41 0.41 0 0.00 1 0.41 0 0 0 0 1 0.41 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 2 0.16 0.328 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.328 0 0 2 0.33 Botanical Park - Land development +all type of No 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 plantation 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 0 2.56 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Tyod IWMp 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 1 3.07 3.07 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.07 0 0 1 3.07 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 0 4.02 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 0 4.61 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Common Ha 1 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 land 0.24 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 1 0.70 0.70 0 0.00 0 0 1 0.7 0 0 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 1 1.58 1.58 0 0 0 0 1 1.58 0 0 1 1.58 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 5 0.08 0.40 0 0.00 5 0.40 0 0 0 0 5 0.40 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 5 0.13 0.65 0 0.00 5 0.65 0 0 0 0 5 0.65 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 5 0.17 0.85 0 0.00 5 0.85 0 0 0 0 5 0.85 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 0 3.30 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Total (B) 68.54 4.64 25.547 38.353 0.00 68.54 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model No 4 0.10 0.38 0 0.00 2 0.19 2 0.19 0 0.00 4 0.38 Drip Irrigation Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 1 0.24 1 0.24 0 0 2 0.48 Sprinkler Model No 4 0.24 0.96 0.00 2 0.48 2 0.48 0 0 4 0.96 No 1 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 Demonstration of Flower / Spice cultivation 0.05 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home stead No 50 0.05 0.00 20 1.00 30 1.5 0 0 50 2.50 plantation 2.50
No 10 0.20 0.00 5 1.00 5 1 0 0 10 2.00 Demonstration of Vermi Composting Model 2.00 NADEP composting No 3 0.10 0.30 0.00 2 0.20 1 0.1 0 0 3 0.30 Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration No 50 0.04 2.00 0 0.00 20 0.80 30 1.20 0 0 50 2.00 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model No 1 0.05 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal No 1 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 cultivation 0.05 Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 management 0.00 Demonstration of Forage crops No 2 0.05 0.10 0.00 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 2 0.10 Developing Soil health card of farmers No 100 0.0003 0.03 0.00 100 0.03 0 0 0 0 100 0.03 Tyod IWMp 13, Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Tool kit for skilled labour No 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 0.00 2 0.2 3 0.3 5 0.50 Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0 0.00 0 2 0.2 2 0.20 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 0 0 1 0.75 1 0.75 Goatry model(4+1) No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 Organize Veternery Camps No 4 0.20 0.80 0 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.4 0 0 4 0.80 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.08 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model for group of No 5 0.12 0.00 0.00 0 0 5 0.6 5 0.60 animals 0.60 Pashu Naad - Basic No 5 0.05 0.25 0.00 1 0.05 4 0.2 0 0 5 0.25 Sub Total (B) 12.24 0.00 4.590 5.800 1.850 12.24
( D) Livelihood System 9%
No 28 0.25 8 2.00 10 2.50 10 2.51 0 0.00 28 7.01 Seed Money and revolving fund for SHGs 7.01
Revolving Fund to enterprising No 10 0.25 0 0.00 5 1.25 5 1.25 0 0.00 10 2.50 individual(maximum 10 %) 2.50 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual (maximum No 1 1.50 0 0.00 1 1.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1.50 30 % ) 1.50 Total (D ) 11.01 2.00 5.250 3.760 0.000 11.01 (E) Consolidation 3 % 3.67 0 0 2.20 1.47 3.67 Grand Total 122.39 7.96 14.50 40.60 52.94 6.39 122.38
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Tyod IWMP 13 , Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- Khatoli (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 9.20 1.84 2.113 2.344 1.614 1.287 9.20 Monitoring 1% 0.92 0.09 0.09 0.319 0.092 0.325 0.92 Evaluation 1% 0.92 0.09 0.09 0.319 0.092 0.325 0.92 EPA 4% 3.68 2.30 1.38 3.68 I & CB 5% 4.60 1.10 1.867 0.93789 0.321 0.367 4.60 DPR 1% 0.92 0.55 0.37 0.92 Total (A) 22% 20.23 5.98 5.91 3.919 2.119 2.304 20.23 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 190 0.13 25.08 30 3.9603 125 16.50 35 4.62 0 0 190 25.08 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 3 0.25 0.741 2 0.494 1 0.25 0 0 0 0 3 0.74 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 2 0.18 0.362 0 0 1 0.18 0 0 1 0.181 2 0.36 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 0 0.42 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 1 0.65 0.65 0 0 1 0.65 0 0 0 0 1 0.65 Khadin 0 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 0 0.22 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 0 1 0.35 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 2 0.62 1.24 0 0 1 0.62 1 0.62 0 0 2 1.24 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 4 1.12 4.48 0 0 2 2.24 2 2.24 0 0 4 4.48 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 0 0.18 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Land reclamation and development Ha 2 0.24 0 0 2 0.48 0 0 0 2 0.48 0.48 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 12 1.06 0 0 5 5.3 7 7.42 0 0 12 12.72 Pasture Model 12.72 Ha 0 0.41 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Horticulture plantation on common land 0 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 5 0.16 0.82 0 0.00 2 0.33 3 0.492 0 0 5 0.82 Khatoli IWMP 13 , Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Botanical Park - Land development +all type No 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 of plantation 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 1 2.56 2.56 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 2.56 0 0 1 2.56 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 0 3.07 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 0 4.02 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 0 4.61 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Common Ha 1 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 land 0.24 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 1 0.44 0.44 0 0 1 0.44 0 0 0 0 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 1 0.70 0.70 0 0.00 0 0 1 0.70 0 0 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 0 1.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 2 0.08 0.16 0 0.00 2 0.16 0 0 0 0 2 0.16 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 1 0.13 0.13 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0 0 0 1 0.13 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 2 0.17 0.34 0 0.00 2 0.34 0 0 0 0 2 0.34 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-I 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-II ( 15 m) 0 3.30 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-III 0 6.46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Type-IV 0 7.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Total (B) 51.49 4.45 27.967 18.892 0.18 51.49 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model No 2 0.10 0.19 0 0.00 2 0.19 0 0 0 0.00 2 0.19 Drip Irrigation Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 0 0 1 0.24 Sprinkler Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.48 0 0 2 0.48 No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Demonstration of Flower / Spice cultivation 0.00
Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home stead No 35 0.05 0.00 15 0.75 20 1 0 0 35 1.75 plantation 1.75
No 7 0.20 0.00 5 1.00 2 0.40 0 0 7 1.40 Demonstration of Vermi Composting Model 1.40
Khatoli IWMP 13 , Ajmer
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin NADEP composting No 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 2 0.20 3 0.3 0 0 5 0.50 Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops No 35 0.04 0 0.00 20 0.80 15 0.60 0 0 35 1.40 Demonstration 1.40 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model No 1 0.05 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal No 1 0.05 0.00 1 0.05 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 cultivation 0.05 Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 0 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 management 0.00 Demonstration of Forage crops No 2 0.05 0.10 0.00 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 2 0.10 Developing Soil health card of farmers No 50 0.0003 0.015 0.00 0 0.00 50 0.015 0 0 50 0.02 Tool kit for skilled labour No 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 2 0.20 3 0.3 0 0 5 0.50 Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.2 0 0 2 0.20 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0 0 1 0.75 Goatry model(4+1) No 1 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0 0 1 0.24 Organize Veternery Camps No 4 0.20 0.80 0 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.4 0 0 4 0.80 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Pashu Naad with drainage Model for group of No 2 0.12 0.00 2 0.24 0 0 0 0 2 0.24 animals 0.24 Pashu Naad - Basic No 6 0.05 0.30 0.00 3 0.15 3 0.15 0 0 6 0.30 Sub Total (B) 9.21 0.00 4.320 4.885 0.000 9.21 ( D) Livelihood System 9% No 21 0.25 10 2.50 8 2.00 3 0.76 0 0.00 21 5.26 Seed Money and revolving fund for SHGs 5.26 Revolving Fund to enterprising No 6 0.25 0 0.00 3 0.75 3 0.75 0 0.00 6 1.50 individual(maximum 10 %) 1.50 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs No 1 1.50 0 0.00 1 1.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1.50 individual (maximum 30 % ) 1.50 Total (D ) 8.26 2.50 4.250 1.510 0.000 8.26 (E) Consolidation 3 % 2.76 0 0 1.66 1.10 2.76 Grand Total 91.95 5.98 12.87 40.46 29.06 3.59 91.95
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Khatoli IWMP 13
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli) (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 84.57 16.91 19.42 21.56 14.84 11.84 84.57 Monitoring 1% 8.46 0.85 0.85 2.93 0.85 2.99 8.46 Evaluation 1% 8.46 0.85 0.85 2.93 0.85 2.99 8.46 EPA 4% 33.83 21.14 12.69 33.83 I & CB 5% 42.29 10.16 17.17 8.63 2.95 3.38 42.28 DPR 1% 8.46 5.07 3.38 8.46 Total (A) 22% 186.05 54.97 54.36 36.04 19.49 21.19 186.05 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 1701 0.13 224.55 400 52.81 909 119.99 392 51.75 0 0.00 1701 224.55 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 94 0.25 23.22 21 5.19 65 16.06 8 1.98 0 0.00 94 23.22 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 52 0.18 9.41 14 2.53 26 4.71 11 1.99 1 0.18 52 9.41 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0.00 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 3 0.42 1.26 0 0 1 0.42 0 0.00 2 0.84 3 1.26 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 11 0.65 7.15 0 0 6 3.90 5 3.25 0 0.00 11 7.15 Khadin 0.00 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 4 0.22 0.88 0 0 3 0.66 1 0.22 0 0.00 4 0.88 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 10 0.35 3.50 2 0.7 6 2.10 2 0.70 0 0.00 10 3.50 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 16 0.62 9.92 3 1.86 7 4.34 6 3.72 0 0.00 16 9.92 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 41 1.12 45.92 4 4.48 25 28.00 10 11.20 2 2.24 41 45.92 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 8 0.18 1.44 0 0 8 1.44 0 0 0 0 8 1.44 Land reclamation and Ha 10 0.24 2.40 0 0 10 2.40 0 0 0 0 10 2.40 development Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry Ha 70 1.06 74.20 0 0 28 29.68 42 44.52 0 0 70 74.20 and Pasture Model Horticulture plantation on Ha 10 0.41 4.10 3 1.23 5 2.05 2 0.82 0 0 10 4.10 common land Ha 22 0.16 3.61 0 0 14 2.30 8 1.31 0 0 22 3.61 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Consolidated 13 IWMP 13
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Botanical Park - Land development No 2 2.50 5.00 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 5.00 +all type of plantation Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 4 2.56 10.24 0 0 3 7.68 1 2.56 0 0 4 10.24 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 3 3.07 9.21 0 0 2 6.14 1 3.07 0 0 3 9.21 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 1 4.02 4.02 0 0 0 0 1 4.02 0 0 1 4.02 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 1 4.61 4.61 0 0 1 4.61 0 0 0 0 1 4.61 Type-V Nos 0 7.75 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Ha 11 0.24 2.64 0 0 7 1.68 4 0.96 0 0 11 2.64 Common land Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 6 0.44 2.64 0 0 6 2.64 0 0 0 0 6 2.64 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 5 0.70 3.50 3 2.1 0 0 2 1.4 0 0 5 3.50 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 3 1.58 4.74 2 3.16 0 0 1 1.58 0 0 3 4.74 LSCD Nos 0 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 26 0.08 2.08 4 0.32 16 1.28 0 0 6 0.48 26 2.08 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 24 0.13 3.12 6 0.78 13 1.69 0 0 5 0.65 24 3.12 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 19 0.17 3.23 7 1.19 7 1.19 0 0 5 0.85 19 3.23 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 2 0.20 0.40 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0 2 0.40 Pucca check dam Nos 0 Type-II ( 15 m) 2 3.30 6.60 0 0 2 6.6 0 0 0 0 2 6.60 ( C ) 473.59 76.36 256.947 135.045 5.24 473.59 Production measures for arable land Production System (10%) Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 No 32 0.09 3.024 8 0.76 12 1.13 10 0.95 2 0.19 32 3.02 Ha Drip Irrigation Model No 7 0.24 1.68 0 0.00 4 0.96 2 0.48 1 0.24 7 1.68 Sprinkler Model No 12 0.24 2.88 0 0.00 2 0.48 6 1.44 4 0.96 12 2.88 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 16 0.05 0.80 0 0.00 1 0.05 10 0.50 5 0.25 16 0.80 cultivation
Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , No 320 0.05 16.00 0 0.00 71 3.55 131 6.55 118 5.90 320 16.00 home stead plantation
Consolidated 13 IWMP 13
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Demonstration of Vermi No 40 0.20 8.00 0 0.00 17 3.40 15 3.00 8 1.60 40 8.00 Composting Model NADEP composting No 35 0.10 3.50 0 0.00 12 1.20 9 0.90 14 1.40 35 3.50
Participartory Varietal Selection- No 496 0.04 19.84 20 0.80 210 8.40 104 4.16 162 6.48 496 19.84 Crops Demonstration High Breed Vegetable Cultivation No 15 0.05 0.75 0 0.00 6 0.30 9 0.45 0 0.00 15 0.75 Model
Demonstration of Model of No 22 0.05 1.10 0 0.00 12 0.60 10 0.50 0 0.00 22 1.10 Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious No 8 0.05 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.40 0 0.00 8 0.40 feeding management
No 20 0.05 1.00 0 0.00 2 0.10 12 0.60 6 0.30 20 1.00 Demonstration of Forage crops
Developing Soil health card of No 854 0.0003 0.26 0 0.00 200 0.06 450 0.14 204 0.06 854 0.26 farmers
Tool kit for skilled labour No 52 0.10 5.20 0 0.00 2 0.20 13 1.30 37 3.70 52 5.20 Livestocks No 0.00
No 8 0.10 0.80 0 0.00 4 0.40 2 0.20 2 0.2 8 0.80 Primary health kit for livestock
Breed Improvement - Natural No 5 0.75 3.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 2.25 2 1.5 5 3.75 method Goatry model(4+1) No 8 0.24 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 1.92 0 0 8 1.92 Organize Veternery Camps No 29 0.20 5.80 4 0.80 12 2.40 8 1.60 5 1 29 5.80
No 4 0.08 0.32 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.32 0 0 4 0.32 Establish Travis in the village Pashu Naad with drainage Model No 28 0.12 3.36 0 0.00 2 0.24 2 0.24 24 2.88 28 3.36 for group of animals
Pashu Naad - Basic No 84 0.05 4.20 0 0.00 37 1.85 17 0.85 30 1.5 84 4.20 Sub Total (B) 84.58 2.36 25.322 28.742 28.159 84.58
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund No 188 0.25 47.44 38 9.50 61 15.26 35 9.03 54 13.65 188 47.44 for SHGs Consolidated 13 IWMP 13
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Revolving Fund to enterprising No 42 0.25 10.66 4 1.00 10 2.51 14 3.65 14 3.50 42 10.66 individual(maximum 10 %) Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs No 12 1.50 18.01 2 3.00 5 7.51 2 3.00 3 4.50 12 18.01 individual (maximum 30 % ) Total (D ) 76.11 13.50 25.284 15.680 21.646 76.11 (E) Consolidation 3 % 25.37 0 0 15.22 10.15 25.37 Grand Total 845.70 54.97 146.57 343.60 214.2 86.4 845.70
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Consolidated 13 IWMP 13 Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND GRAM PANCHAYAT- 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli) (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quantit Unit Sursura Roopangarh Tyod Khatoli Ralawata Bhadun y cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 10% 84.57 30.72 23.94 12.24 9.20 5.40 3.08 Monitoring 1% 8.46 3.07 2.39 1.22 0.92 0.54 0.31 Evaluation 1% 8.46 3.07 2.39 1.22 0.92 0.54 0.31 EPA 4% 33.83 12.29 9.58 4.90 3.68 2.16 1.23 I & CB 5% 42.29 15.36 11.97 6.12 4.60 2.70 1.54 DPR 1% 8.46 3.07 2.39 1.22 0.92 0.54 0.31 Total (A) 22% 186.05 67.58 52.67 26.93 20.22 11.88 6.77 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 1701 0.13 224.55 521 68.77 452 59.66 260 34.32 190 25.08 197 26.00 81 10.69 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 94 0.25 23.22 55 13.59 25 6.18 6 1.48 3 0.74 4 0.99 1 0.25 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 52 0.18 9.41 26 4.71 15 2.72 3 0.54 2 0.36 6 1.09 0 0.00 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 3 0.42 1.26 0 0.00 2 0.84 1 0.42 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 11 0.65 7.15 5 3.25 4 2.60 1 0.65 1 0.65 0 0.00 0 0.00 Khadin 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 4 0.22 0.88 2 0.44 1 0.22 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.22 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 10 0.35 3.50 5 1.75 3 1.05 1 0.35 1 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 16 0.62 9.92 6 3.72 5 3.10 2 1.24 2 1.24 0 0.00 1 0.62 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 41 1.12 45.92 18 20.16 14 15.68 4 4.48 4 4.48 1 1.12 0 0.00 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 8 0.18 1.44 5 0.90 3 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Land reclamation and development Ha 10 0.24 2.40 3 0.72 2 0.48 2 0.48 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.72 Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development
Consolidated Panchyatwise IWMP 13 Ajmer
Activity Unit Quantit Unit Sursura Roopangarh Tyod Khatoli Ralawata Bhadun y cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Ha 70 1.06 74.20 18 19.08 15 15.90 12 12.72 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pasture Model 25 26.50 Horticulture plantation on common Ha 10 0.41 4.10 5 2.05 1 0.41 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.41 land 3 1.23 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 22 0.16 3.61 8 1.31 5 0.82 2 0.33 5 0.82 0 0.00 2 0.33 Botanical Park - Land development +all type No 2 2.50 5.00 1 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 of plantation 1 2.50 Nadi 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 4 2.56 10.24 1 2.56 1 2.56 0 0.00 1 2.56 0 0.00 1 2.56 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 3 3.07 9.21 1 3.07 1 3.07 1 3.07 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 1 4.02 4.02 1 4.02 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 1 4.61 4.61 1 4.61 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Ha 11 0.24 2.64 5 1.20 1 0.24 1 0.24 0 0.00 1 0.24 Common land 3 0.72 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 6 0.44 2.64 1 0.44 1 0.44 1 0.44 1 0.44 1 0.44 1 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 5 0.70 3.50 1 0.70 1 0.70 1 0.70 1 0.70 0 0.00 1 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 3 1.58 4.74 1 1.58 1 1.58 1 1.58 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 26 0.08 2.08 4 0.32 10 0.80 5 0.40 2 0.16 5 0.40 0 0.00 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 24 0.13 3.12 5 0.65 10 1.30 5 0.65 1 0.13 0 0.00 3 0.39 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 19 0.17 3.23 3 0.51 8 1.36 5 0.85 2 0.34 0 0.00 1 0.17 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 2 0.20 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.20 Pucca check dam Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Type- II ( 15 m) 2 3.30 6.60 1 3.30 1 3.30 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ( C ) 473.59 172.03 134.08 68.54 51.49 30.24 17.22 Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land No 32 0.09 3.02 12 1.13 4 0.38 2 0.19 2 0.19 0 0.00 Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 Ha 12 1.13
Consolidated Panchyatwise IWMP 13 Ajmer
Activity Unit Quantit Unit Sursura Roopangarh Tyod Khatoli Ralawata Bhadun y cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Drip Irrigation Model No 7 0.24 1.68 2 0.48 1 0.24 2 0.48 1 0.24 1 0.24 0 0.00 Sprinkler Model No 12 0.24 2.88 2 0.48 1 0.24 4 0.96 2 0.48 2 0.48 1 0.24 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 16 0.05 0.80 5 0.25 1 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 cultivation 10 0.50 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , No 320 0.05 16.00 80 4.00 50 2.50 35 1.75 20 1.00 10 0.50 home stead plantation 125 6.25 Demonstration of Vermi Composting No 40 0.20 8.00 8 1.60 10 2.00 7 1.40 3 0.60 2 0.40 Model 10 2.00 NADEP composting No 35 0.10 3.50 15 1.50 10 1.00 3 0.30 5 0.50 2 0.20 0 0.00 Participartory Varietal Selection- No 496 0.04 19.84 161 6.44 50 2.00 35 1.40 25 1.00 25 1.00 Crops Demonstration 200 8.00 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation No 15 0.05 0.75 5 0.25 1 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 Model 7 0.35 Demonstration of Model of No 22 0.05 1.10 10 0.50 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 Medicinal cultivation 10 0.50 Demonstration of nutritious feeding No 8 0.05 0.40 4 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 management 4 0.20
Demonstration of Forage crops No 20 0.05 1.00 7 0.35 7 0.35 2 0.10 2 0.10 2 0.10 0 0.00 Developing Soil health card of No 854 0.0003 0.26 304 0.09 100 0.03 50 0.02 100 0.03 0 0.00 farmers 300 0.09 Tool kit for skilled labour No 52 0.10 5.20 15 1.50 20 2.00 5 0.50 5 0.50 5 0.50 2 0.20 Livestocks No 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Primary health kit for livestock No 8 0.10 0.80 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 Breed Improvement - Natural No 5 0.75 3.75 1 0.75 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 method 2 1.50 Goatry model(4+1) No 8 0.24 1.92 2 0.48 2 0.48 1 0.24 1 0.24 1 0.24 1 0.24 Organize Veternery Camps No 29 0.20 5.80 8 1.60 8 1.60 4 0.80 4 0.80 3 0.60 2 0.40 Establish Travis in the village No 4 0.08 0.32 2 0.16 2 0.16 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model for No 28 0.12 3.36 10 1.20 5 0.60 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 group of animals 10 1.20
Pashu Naad - Basic No 84 0.05 4.20 45 2.25 25 1.25 5 0.25 6 0.30 1 0.05 2 0.10 Sub Total (B) 84.58 30.72 23.93 12.240 9.205 5.398 3.08
Consolidated Panchyatwise IWMP 13 Ajmer
Activity Unit Quantit Unit Sursura Roopangarh Tyod Khatoli Ralawata Bhadun y cost Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund for No 188 0.25 47.44 52 13.15 28 7.01 21 5.26 11 2.86 7 1.75 SHGs 69 17.40 Revolving Fund to enterprising No 42 0.25 10.66 9 2.40 10 2.50 6 1.50 2 0.50 4 1.00 individual(maximum 10 %) 11 2.75
Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or No 12 1.50 18.01 4 6.00 1 1.50 1 1.50 1 1.50 0 0.00 Federation of SHGs individual (maximum 30 % ) 5 7.50 Total (D ) 76.11 27.66 21.55 11.014 8.264 4.864 2.754 (E) Consolidation 3 % 25.37 9.22 7.182 3.672 2.7585 1.62 0.923 Grand Total 845.70 307.21 239.41 122.39 91.94 54.0 30.74
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora District Ajmer
Consolidated Panchyatwise IWMP 13 Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAM PANCHAYAT- 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli) (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Sursura RoopangarhTotal Tyod Activity Unit Total Cost Beneficia Cost Benefici Beneficiar from ry from ary Total Cost y Unit Total Project Converg Contribut Total Project Converg Contrib from Project Converge Contributi cost Qty. Cost fund ence ion Qty. Cost fund ence ution Qty. Total Cost fund nce on Administration 10% 30.72 30.72 0.00 0.00 23.94 23.94 12.24 12.24 Monitoring 1% 3.07 3.07 0.00 0.00 2.39 2.39 1.22 1.22 Evaluation 1% 3.07 3.07 0.00 0.00 2.39 2.39 1.22 1.22 EPA 4% 12.29 12.29 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.58 4.90 4.90 I & CB 5% 15.36 15.36 0.00 0.00 11.97 11.97 6.12 6.12 DPR 1% 3.07 3.07 0.00 0.00 2.39 2.39 1.22 1.22 Total (A) 22% 67.58 67.58 0.00 0.00 52.67 52.67 26.93 26.93 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 0.13 521 70.15 68.77 1.375 5.50 452 60.86 59.66 1.193 4.77 260 35.01 34.32 0.686 2.75 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 0.25 55 13.84 13.59 0.257 1.02 25 6.29 6.18 0.117 0.46 6 1.51 1.48 0.028 0.11 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 0.18 26 4.71 4.71 0.00 0.47 15 2.72 2.72 0.00 0.27 3 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.05 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 0.42 0 0.00 0.00 2 1.64 0.84 0.80 0.08 1 0.82 0.42 0.40 0.04 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 0.65 5 3.25 3.25 0.00 0.33 4 2.60 2.60 0.00 0.26 1 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.07 Khadin Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 0.22 2 1.44 0.44 1.00 0.03 1 0.72 0.22 0.50 0.02 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 0.35 5 1.75 1.75 0.12 3 1.05 1.05 0.07 1 0.35 0.35 0.02 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 0.62 6 3.72 3.72 0.28 5 3.10 3.10 0.23 2 1.24 1.24 0.09 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 1.12 18 20.16 20.16 1.51 14 15.68 15.68 1.18 4 4.48 4.48 0.34 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 0.18 5 0.90 0.90 0.09 3 0.54 0.54 0.05 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Land reclamation and Ha 0.24 3 0.72 2 0.48 development 3 0.72 0.72 0.14 0.72 0.14 0.48 0.10 Conservation measures for non arable land
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Sursura RoopangarhTotal Tyod Activity Unit Total Cost Beneficia Cost Benefici Beneficiar from ry from ary Total Cost y Unit Total Project Converg Contribut Total Project Converg Contrib from Project Converge Contributi cost Qty. Cost fund ence ion Qty. Cost fund ence ution Qty. Total Cost fund nce on Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry Ha 1.06 18 19.08 15 15.90 and Pasture Model 25 35.51 26.50 9.01 1.33 25.57 6.49 0.95 21.31 5.41 0.80 Horticulture plantation on common Ha 0.41 5 2.05 1 0.41 land 3 1.35 1.23 0.12 0.06 2.17 0.12 0.10 0.53 0.12 0.02 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 0.16 8 1.31 1.31 0.07 5 0.82 0.82 0.04 2 0.33 0.33 0.02 Botanical Park - Land development +all type No 2.50 1 2.50 0 0.00 of plantation 1 2.50 2.50 0.25 2.50 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 2.56 1 2.56 2.56 0.13 1 2.56 2.56 0.13 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 3.07 1 3.07 3.07 0.15 1 3.07 3.07 0.15 1 3.07 3.07 0.15 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 4.02 1 4.02 4.02 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 4.61 1 4.61 4.61 0.23 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on Ha 0.24 5 1.20 1.20 1 0.24 0.24 Common land 3 0.72 0.72 0.04 0.06 0.01 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 0.44 1 0.44 0.44 1 0.44 0.44 1 0.44 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 0.70 1 0.70 0.70 1 0.70 0.70 1 0.70 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 1.58 1 1.58 1.58 1 1.58 1.58 1 1.58 1.58 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 0.08 4 0.32 0.32 10 0.80 0.80 5 0.40 0.40 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 0.13 5 0.65 0.65 10 1.30 1.30 5 0.65 0.65 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 0.17 3 0.51 0.51 8 1.36 1.36 5 0.85 0.85 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Pucca check dam Type-II ( 15 m) 3.30 1 3.30 3.30 1 3.30 3.30 0 0.00 0.00 183.79 172.03 143.29 134.08 75.18 68.54 ( C ) Production System (10%)
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Sursura RoopangarhTotal Tyod Activity Unit Total Cost Beneficia Cost Benefici Beneficiar from ry from ary Total Cost y Unit Total Project Converg Contribut Total Project Converg Contrib from Project Converge Contributi cost Qty. Cost fund ence ion Qty. Cost fund ence ution Qty. Total Cost fund nce on Production measures for arable land No 0.09 12 1.51 1.13 4 0.50 0.38 Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 Ha 12 1.51 1.13 0.37 0.17 0.37 0.17 0.12 0.06 Drip Irrigation Model No 0.24 2 1.91 0.48 1.43 0.07 1 0.96 0.24 0.72 0.04 2 1.91 0.48 1.43 0.07 Sprinkler Model No 0.24 2 1.32 0.48 0.84 0.07 1 0.66 0.24 0.42 0.04 4 2.63 0.96 1.67 0.14 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 0.05 5 0.25 0.25 1 0.05 0.05 cultivation 10 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.04 0.01 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , No 0.05 80 4.00 4.00 50 2.50 2.50 home stead plantation 125 6.25 6.25 0.94 0.60 0.38 Demonstration of Vermi No 0.20 8 2.00 1.60 10 2.50 2.00 Composting Model 10 2.50 2.00 0.50 0.30 0.40 0.24 0.50 0.30 NADEP composting No 0.10 15 1.50 1.50 0.23 10 1.00 1.00 0.15 3 0.30 0.30 0.05 Participartory Varietal Selection- No 0.04 161 11.33 6.44 50 3.52 2.00 Crops Demonstration 200 14.08 8.00 6.08 1.20 4.89 0.97 1.52 0.30 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation No 0.05 5 0.92 0.25 1 0.18 0.05 Model 7 1.28 0.35 0.93 0.05 0.67 0.04 0.13 0.01 Demonstration of Model of No 0.05 10 0.73 0.50 1 0.07 0.05 Medicinal cultivation 10 0.73 0.50 0.23 0.08 0.23 0.08 0.02 0.01 Demonstration of nutritious No 0.05 4 0.20 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 feeding management 4 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.03 0.00
Demonstration of Forage crops No 0.05 7 0.35 0.35 0.05 7 0.35 0.35 0.05 2 0.10 0.10 0.02 Developing Soil health card of No 0.0003 304 0.09 0.09 100 0.03 0.03 farmers 300 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.00 Tool kit for skilled labour No 0.10 15 1.50 1.50 0.23 20 2.00 2.00 0.30 5 0.50 0.50 0.08 Livestocks No 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Sursura RoopangarhTotal Tyod Activity Unit Total Cost Beneficia Cost Benefici Beneficiar from ry from ary Total Cost y Unit Total Project Converg Contribut Total Project Converg Contrib from Project Converge Contributi cost Qty. Cost fund ence ion Qty. Cost fund ence ution Qty. Total Cost fund nce on
Primary health kit for livestock No 0.10 2 0.20 0.20 2 0.20 0.20 2 0.20 0.20 Breed Improvement - Natural No 0.75 1 1.30 0.75 1 1.30 0.75 method 2 2.60 1.50 1.10 0.23 0.55 0.11 0.55 0.11 Goatry model(4+1) No 0.24 2 0.73 0.48 0.25 0.07 2 0.73 0.48 0.25 0.07 1 0.36 0.24 0.12 0.04 Organize Veternery Camps No 0.20 8 4.35 1.60 2.75 0.24 8 4.35 1.60 2.75 0.24 4 2.18 0.80 1.38 0.12 Establish Travis in the village No 0.08 2 0.16 0.16 0.02 2 0.16 0.16 0.02 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model No 0.12 10 1.20 1.20 5 0.60 0.60 for group of animals 10 1.20 1.20 0.18 0.18 0.09
Pashu Naad - Basic No 0.05 45 2.25 2.25 0.34 25 1.25 1.25 0.19 5 0.25 0.25 0.04 Sub Total (B) 45.20 30.72 35.18 23.94 19.688 12.238
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund for No 0.25 24.71 52 18.68 13.15 28 9.96 7.01 SHGs 69 17.40 7.31 5.52 2.95 Revolving Fund to enterprising No 0.25 3.28 9 2.85 2.40 10 2.98 2.50 individual(maximum 10 %) 11 2.75 0.52 0.46 0.48 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual No 1.50 7.50 4 6.00 6.00 1 1.50 1.50 (maximum 30 % ) 5 7.50 Total (D ) 35.50 27.66 7.83 27.53 21.55 14.435 11.014 (E) Consolidation 3 % 9.22 9.22 7.182 7.182 3.672 3.672 Grand Total 341.28 307.21 265.85 239.42 139.90 122.39
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer, PIA Panchayat Sammitti - Silora Panchayat Sammitti - Silora
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
CHAPTER -V (A) IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( Kishangarh), District- Ajmer
PROPOSEDPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLAN 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli) Preparatory phase activities(A) capacity building trainings & EPA
Khatoli RalawataTotal BhadunTotal Activity Total Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficiar from ry from ry from y Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contributi Qty. Total Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce on Administration 9.20 9.20 5.40 5.40 3.08 3.075 Monitoring 0.92 0.92 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.3075 Evaluation 0.92 0.92 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.3075 EPA 3.68 3.68 2.16 2.16 1.23 1.23 I & CB 4.60 4.60 2.70 2.70 1.54 1.5375 DPR 0.92 0.92 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.3075 Total (A) 22% 20.22 20.22 11.88 11.88 6.77 6.77 Natural resource(B) management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) 190 25.58 25.08 0.502 2.01 197 26.52 26.00 0.520 2.08 81 10.91 11 0.214 0.86 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) 3 0.76 0.74 0.014 0.06 4 1.01 0.99 0.019 0.07 1 0.25 0.25 0.005 0.02 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) 2 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.04 6 1.09 1.09 0.00 0.11 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai Small ( 11 X 11 m) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Big ( 13 X 13 M) 1 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.07 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Khadin Type-I ( 90 m) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.72 0.22 0.50 0.02 Type-II ( 135 m) 1 0.35 0.35 0.02 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-III ( 180 m ) 2 1.24 1.24 0.09 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 0.62 0.05 Type-IV ( 270 m ) 4 4.48 4.48 0.34 1 1.12 1.12 0.08 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Land reclamation and 2 0.48 0 0.00 0 development 0.48 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Conservation measures for non arable land
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Khatoli RalawataTotal BhadunTotal Activity Total Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficiar from ry from ry from y Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contributi Qty. Total Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce on Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry 12 12.72 0 0.00 0 0.00 and Pasture Model 17.04 4.32 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Horticulture plantation on common 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.41 land 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.53 0.12 0.02 V- Ditch / CVH in common land 5 0.82 0.82 0.04 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.33 0.33 0.02 Botanical Park - Land development +all type 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 of plantation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) 1 2.56 2.56 0.13 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 2.56 2.56 0.13 Type-II ( 100 m ) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-III ( 120 m ) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Type-IV ( 150 m ) 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Agro Forestry Plantation on 1 0.24 0.24 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.24 0.24 Common land 0.01 0.00 0.01 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) 1 0.44 0.44 1 0.44 0.44 1 0.44 0.44 Type-II ( 5 m) 1 0.70 0.70 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.70 Type-III ( 7 m ) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 LSCD 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 2 0.16 0.16 5 0.40 0.40 0 0.00 0.00 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 1 0.13 0.13 0 0.00 0.00 3 0.39 0.39 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 2 0.34 0.34 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.17 0.17 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 0.20 1 0.20 0.20 Pucca check dam Type-II ( 15 m) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 56.46 51.49 30.90 30.24 18.06 17.22 Production( C ) System (10%)
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Khatoli RalawataTotal BhadunTotal Activity Total Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficiar from ry from ry from y Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contributi Qty. Total Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce on Production measures for arable land 2 0.25 0.19 2 0.25 0.19 0 0.00 0.00 Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 Ha 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 Drip Irrigation Model 1 0.96 0.24 0.72 0.04 1 0.96 0.24 0.72 0.04 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sprinkler Model 2 1.32 0.48 0.84 0.07 2 1.32 0.48 0.84 0.07 1 0.66 0.24 0.42 0.04 Demonstration of Flower / Spice 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 cultivation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , 35 1.75 1.75 20 1.00 1.00 10 0.50 0.50 home stead plantation 0.26 0.15 0.08 Demonstration of Vermi 7 1.75 1.40 3 0.75 0.60 2 0.50 0.40 Composting Model 0.35 0.21 0.15 0.09 0.10 0.06 NADEP composting 5 0.50 0.50 0.08 2 0.20 0.20 0.03 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Participartory Varietal Selection- 35 2.46 1.40 25 1.76 1.00 25 1.76 1.00 Crops Demonstration 1.06 0.21 0.76 0.15 0.76 0.15 High Breed Vegetable Cultivation 1 0.18 0.05 1 0.18 0.05 0 0.00 0.00 Model 0.13 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 Demonstration of Model of 1 0.07 0.05 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Medicinal cultivation 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demonstration of nutritious 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 feeding management 0.00 0.00 0.00
Demonstration of Forage crops 2 0.10 0.10 0.02 2 0.10 0.10 0.02 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Developing Soil health card of 50 0.02 0.02 100 0.03 0.03 0 0.00 0.00 farmers 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tool kit for skilled labour 5 0.50 0.50 0.08 5 0.50 0.50 0.08 2 0.20 0.20 0.03 Livestocks 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13 Ajmer
Khatoli RalawataTotal BhadunTotal Activity Total Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficia Cost Beneficiar from ry from ry from y Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contribut Total Project Converge Contributi Qty. Total Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce ion Qty. Cost fund nce on
Primary health kit for livestock 2 0.20 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Breed Improvement - Natural 1 1.30 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 method 0.55 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Goatry model(4+1) 1 0.36 0.24 0.12 0.04 1 0.36 0.24 0.12 0.04 1 0.36 0.24 0.12 0.04 Organize Veternery Camps 4 2.18 0.80 1.38 0.12 3 1.63 0.60 1.03 0.09 2 1.09 0.40 0.69 0.06 Establish Travis in the village 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pashu Naad with drainage Model 2 0.24 0.24 1 0.12 0.12 0 0.00 0.00 for group of animals 0.04 0.02 0.00
Pashu Naad - Basic 6 0.30 0.30 0.05 1 0.05 0.05 0.01 2 0.10 0.10 0.02 Sub Total (B) 14.435 9.204 9.212 5.399 5.17 3.08
Livelihood( D) System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund for 21 7.47 5.26 11 4.07 2.86 7 2.49 1.75 SHGs 2.21 1.20 0.74 Revolving Fund to enterprising 6 1.79 1.50 2 0.60 0.50 4 1.19 1.00 individual(maximum 10 %) 0.29 0.10 0.19 Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual 1 1.50 1.50 1 1.50 1.50 0 0.00 0.00 (maximum 30 % ) Total (D ) 10.760 8.264 6.162 4.864 3.681 2.754 (E) Consolidation 3 % 2.7585 2.7585 1.62 1.62 0.923 0.92 Grand Total 104.63 91.94 59.8 54.0 34.60 30.74
Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. District Ajmer
Consolidated Panchyatwise PDP IWMP 13,Ajmer
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH COVERGENCE PROJECT NAME -IWMP-13 (Sursura-D) BLOCK-KISHANGARH DISTRICT-AJMER COST OF PROJECT-845.70 Lacs Consolidated Worksheet (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
Activity Unit Quant Unit Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total ity cost cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Administration 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Monitoring 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Evaluation 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 EPA 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 I & CB 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 DPR 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total (A) 22% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 HA 1.50 1.50 1.00 0.99 4.99 Type-II HA 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 Type-III HA Farm Pond/ Khet Talai Small Nos 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 1.20 Big Nos Khadin Type-I Nos 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 Type-II Nos Type-III Nos Type-IV Nos Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha Land reclamation and development Ha Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development
Comprehensive Agro Forestry and Pasture Model Ha 25.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 Horticulture plantation on common land Ha 0.25 0.25 0.50 V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha Botanical Park - No Year wise convergence IWMP 13,Ajmer
Activity Unit Quant Unit Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total ity cost cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Nadi Type- I Nos Type-II Nos Type-III Nos Type-IV Nos Agro Forestry Plantation on Common land Ha Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I Nos Type-II Nos Type-III Nos LSCD Nos Type-I Type-II Type-III Type -IV Pucca check dam Nos Type-I Type-II 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Type-III Total (B) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.12 0.00 14.37 0.00 12.95 0.00 1.69 0.00 37.13 ( C ) Production System (10%) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 Ha No 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Drip Irrigation Model No 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.50 5.00 Sprinkler Model No 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.50 5.00 Demonstration of Flower / Spice cultivation No No Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home stead plantation Demonstration of Vermi Composting Model No 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 NADEP composting No No 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 15.00 Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
High Breed Vegetable Cultivation Model No 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 No 0.25 0.25 0.50 Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation Year wise convergence IWMP 13,Ajmer
Activity Unit Quant Unit Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total ity cost cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
No Demonstration of nutritious feeding management Demonstration of Forage crops No
No Developing Soil health card of farmers Tool kit for skilled labour No Livestocks No Primary health kit for livestock No Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 Goatry model(4+1) No 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Organize Veternery Camps No 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 Establish Travis in the village No
No Pashu Naad with drainage Model for group of animals Pashu Naad - Basic No Sub Total (B) 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 10.25 0.00 11.25 0.00 9.00 0.00 43.50 ( D) Livelihood System 9% Seed Money and revolving fund for SHGs No 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 20.00 No 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 Revolving Fund to enterprising individual(maximum 10 %)
Grant in Aids to enterprising SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual No 0.00 (maximum 30 % ) Total (D ) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 5.50 0.00 5.50 0.00 5.50 0.00 22.00 (E) Consolidation 3 % 0.00 0 0 Grand Total 0.00 0.00 102.63
Junior Engineer A.En. Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. P.S. Silora P.S. Silora District Ajmer
Year wise convergence IWMP 13,Ajmer
CHAPTER -IV PROJECT NAME -IWMP-13 (Sursura-D) BLOCK-KISHANGARH DISTRICT-AJMER COST OF PROJECT-845.70 Lacs Activity wise Total Abstract of cost (A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA Convergence Benifecery Cost from project fund ( in Lac Rs. ) Activity Unit Fund contribution Quantity Unit cost Total cost Labour Material Total ( in Lac Rs) ( in Lac Rs) Administration 10% 84.57 0.00 84.57 84.57 Monitoring 1% 8.46 0.00 8.46 8.46 Evaluation 1% 8.46 0.00 8.46 8.46 EPA 4% 33.83 8.46 25.37 33.83 I & CB 5% 42.29 0.00 42.29 42.29 DPR 1% 8.46 0.00 8.46 8.46 Total (A) 22% 186.05 8.46 177.60 186.05 (B) Natural resource management (56%) Conservation measures for arable land (private land) Field bund/Earthen Bund Type-1 ( 0.86 m2 ) HA 1701 0.13 224.55 202.77 21.78 224.55 4.49 17.96 Type-II ( 1.28 m2 ) HA 94 0.25 23.22 20.04 3.18 23.22 0.44 1.74 Type-III ( 1.13 m2 ) HA 52 0.18 9.41 8.46 0.95 9.41 0.94 Farm Pond/ Khet Talai Small ( 11 X 11 m) Nos 3 0.42 1.26 1.01 0.25 1.26 1.20 0.13 Big ( 13 X 13 M) Nos 11 0.65 7.15 5.72 1.43 7.15 0.72 Khadin Type-I ( 90 m) Nos 4 0.22 0.88 0.80 0.08 0.88 2.00 0.06 Type-II ( 135 m) Nos 10 0.35 3.50 3.19 0.32 3.50 0.25 Type-III ( 180 m ) Nos 16 0.62 9.92 8.73 1.19 9.92 0.74 Type-IV ( 270 m ) Nos 41 1.12 45.92 40.41 5.51 45.92 3.44 Stone Wall Terrace (SWT) Ha 8 0.18 1.44 1.40 0.04 1.44 0.14 Land reclamation and Ha 10 0.24 2.40 0.00 2.40 2.40 0.48 development Chapter 4 IWMP 13,Ajmer
Convergence Benifecery Cost from project fund ( in Lac Rs. ) Activity Unit Fund contribution Quantity Unit cost Total cost Labour Material Total ( in Lac Rs) ( in Lac Rs) Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture development Comprehensive Agro Forestry Ha 70 and Pasture Model 1.06 74.20 22.33 51.87 74.20 25.00 3.71 Horticulture plantation on Ha 10 common land 0.41 4.10 3.27 0.83 4.10 0.50 0.21
V- Ditch / CVH in common land Ha 22 0.16 3.61 3.10 0.51 3.61 0.18 Botanical Park - Land development +all No 2 type of plantation 2.50 5.00 1.55 3.45 5.00 0.50 Nadi Type- I ( 90 m) Nos 4 2.56 10.24 6.96 3.28 10.24 0.51 Type-II ( 100 m ) Nos 3 3.07 9.21 6.53 2.68 9.21 0.46 Type-III ( 120 m ) Nos 1 4.02 4.02 2.93 1.09 4.02 0.20 Type-IV ( 150 m ) Nos 1 4.61 4.61 3.27 1.34 4.61 0.23 Type-V Ha 11 0.24 2.64 0.26 2.38 2.64 0.13 Drainage line treatment Medium Masonary Structures Type-I ( 3 m) Nos 6 0.44 2.64 0.72 1.92 2.64 Type-II ( 5 m) Nos 5 0.70 3.50 0.89 2.61 3.50 Type-III ( 7 m ) Nos 3 1.58 4.74 1.20 3.54 4.74 LSCD Type-I ( 3m X 0.90 m) 26 0.08 2.08 0.76 1.32 2.08 Type-II ( 5m X 0.90 m) 24 0.13 3.12 1.13 1.99 3.12 Type-III ( 8m X 0.90 m) 19 0.17 3.23 1.16 2.07 3.23 Type -IV ( 10m X 0.90 m) 2 0.20 0.40 0.16 0.24 0.40 Pucca check dam Nos Type-II ( 15 m) 2 3.30 6.60 1.87 4.73 6.60 3.00 ( C ) 473.59 350.62 122.97 473.59 36.63 32.74 Production System (10%) Chapter 4 IWMP 13,Ajmer
Convergence Benifecery Cost from project fund ( in Lac Rs. ) Activity Unit Fund contribution Quantity Unit cost Total cost Labour Material Total ( in Lac Rs) ( in Lac Rs) Production measures for arable land Horticulture Orchard Model 0.4 No 32 0.09 3.02 0.39 2.63 3.02 1.00 0.45 Ha Drip Irrigation Model No 7 0.24 1.68 0.00 1.68 1.68 5.00 0.25 Sprinkler Model No 12 0.24 2.88 0.00 2.88 2.88 5.00 0.43 Demonstration of Flower / Spice No 16 0.05 0.80 0.10 0.70 0.80 0.12 cultivation
Kitchen Gardening - 50 plants , home No 320 0.05 16.00 0.80 15.20 16.00 2.40 stead plantation Demonstration of Vermi No 40 0.20 8.00 1.20 6.80 8.00 2.00 1.20 Composting Model NADEP composting No 35 0.10 3.50 0.70 2.80 3.50 0.53
Participartory Varietal Selection- No 496 0.04 19.84 4.96 14.88 19.84 15.00 2.98 Crops Demonstration High Breed Vegetable Cultivation No 15 0.05 0.75 0.05 0.70 0.75 2.00 0.11 Model Demonstration of Model of No 22 0.05 1.10 0.08 1.02 1.10 0.50 0.17 Medicinal cultivation Demonstration of nutritious No 8 0.05 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.06 feeding management
Demonstration of Forage crops No 20 0.05 1.00 0.07 0.93 1.00 0.15 Developing Soil health card of No 854 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.04 farmers
Tool kit for skilled labour No 52 0.10 5.20 0.00 5.20 5.20 0.78 Livestocks
No 8 0.10 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80 Primary health kit for livestock
Chapter 4 IWMP 13,Ajmer
Convergence Benifecery Cost from project fund ( in Lac Rs. ) Activity Unit Fund contribution Quantity Unit cost Total cost Labour Material Total ( in Lac Rs) ( in Lac Rs) Breed Improvement - Natural No 5 0.75 3.75 0.00 3.75 3.75 2.00 0.56 method Goatry model(4+1) No 8 0.24 1.92 0.00 1.92 1.92 1.00 0.29 Organize Veternery Camps No 29 0.20 5.80 0.00 5.80 5.80 10.00 0.87 Establish Travis in the village No 4 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.05 Pashu Naad with drainage Model No 28 0.12 3.36 0.00 3.36 3.36 0.50 for group of animals
Pashu Naad - Basic No 84 0.05 4.20 0.42 3.78 4.20 0.63 Sub Total (B) 84.58 8.77 75.81 84.58 43.50 12.567
( D) Livelihood System 9%
Seed Money and revolving fund No 188 0.25 47.44 0 47.44 47.440 20.00 for SHGs
Revolving Fund to enterprising No 42 0.25 10.66 0 10.66 10.656 2.00 individual(maximum 10 %)
Grant in Aids to enterprising No 12 1.50 18.01 0 18.01 18.010 SHGs or Federation of SHGs individual (maximum 30 % ) Total (D ) 76.11 0.00 76.11 76.11 22.00 0.000 (E) Consolidation 3 % 25.37 0 25.371 25.371 Grand Total 845.70 367.85 477.85 845.70 102.13 45.30
Junior Engineer A.En. Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. P.S. Silora P.S. Silora District Ajmer
Chapter 4 PROJECT NAME -IWMP-13 (Sursura-D) COST OF PROJECT-845.70 Lacs BLOCK-KISHANGARH DISTRICT-AJMER SUMMARY SHEET OF GRAM PANCHAYATWISE ALLOCATION OF BUDGET SANCTION COST ( S.No. GRAM PANCHAYAT WORKS PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION IN LACS RS ) TOTAL SWC PE LE TOTAL SWC PE LE 1 SURSURA 307.20 230.41 172.03 30.72 27.66 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 2 RUPANGARH 239.40 179.57 134.08 23.94 21.55 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 3 TYOD 122.40 91.79 68.54 12.24 11.01 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 4 KHATOLI 91.95 68.96 51.49 9.20 8.26 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 5 RALAWATA 54.00 40.50 30.24 5.40 4.86 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 6 BHADUN 30.75 23.05 17.22 3.08 2.75 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09 TOTAL 845.70 634.29 473.60 84.58 76.11 0.75 0.56 0.10 0.09
Junior Engineer A.En. Project Manager WCDC & Ex.En. P.S. Silora P.S. Silora District Ajmer IWMP 13 IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( CHAPTER -V (A) Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli)
Activity Unit Quan Unit 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total tity cost Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin Phy Fin PIA 54.97 54.36 36.04 34.71 31.34 211.42 NRM 76.36 256.947 135.045 5.24 473.59 Production System 2.36 25.324 28.740 28.160 84.58 Livelihood System 13.50 25.284 15.680 21.646 76.11 Grand Total 54.97 146.57 343.60 214.17 86.39 845.70
Junior Engineer 300.00 Panchayat Sammitti - Silora 250.00
200.00
Year wise Consolidated IWMP 13 IWMP 13 (SURSURA D) (2011-12), Panchayat Sammitti Silora ( CHAPTER -V (A) Kishangarh), District- Ajmer ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH PROJECT FUND 6 Panchayats , ( Sursura,Rupangarh,Bhadun, Ralawata, Tyod, Khatoli)
Activity Unit Quan Unit Sursura Rupangarh Tyod Khatoli Ralawata Bhadun tity cost Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin PIA 76.80 59.85 30.60 22.98 13.50 7.69 NRM 172.03 134.08 68.540 51.490 30.24 17.22 Production System 30.72 23.94 12.238 9.204 5.40 3.08 Livelihood System 27.66 21.55 11.010 8.260 4.860 2.75 Grand Total 307.2 239.42 122.39 91.93 54.00 30.74
350.00 Junior Engineer 300.00 Panchayat Sammitti - Silora 250.00
200.00
Panchayat wise consolidated dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< Design of Vegetative Bund for the area up to slope 1%. Type-I Area 3 Ha Proposed Lenth of Earthen Bund 360 M Highest Contour Level Difference Between Contour 0 M Lowest Contour Level Length of Travel M Slope as per Contour Map % Average Slope of Land % S = 1 Soil Type Loamy Sand/Clay/bvlack Cotton Soil 0.35 Side Slope of Bund 1.5 : 1 Slope of Seepage Line 5 : 1 0.65
Maximum 24 Hrs rainfall for 10 year of recurrence interval 20 cm Infiltration Capacity 40% 2.30 Spacing of Contour vegetative bunds Vertical Interval V.I. 1. C.E. Ramsar 's Formula = 0.305(S X+Y) X = Rainfall Factor for Scanty rainfall region = 0.80 V.I. = 0.305(S x 0.8+1) Y = Soil infiltration & Vegetative cover factor = 1.0 (for Below average, Low coverage area) = 0.55 So V.I. considered = 0.55 m Horizontal Interval H.I. H.I. = V.I./S x 100 = = 55.00 Say = 55.00 m Note 1. 20 % deviation in V.I. To accommodate field boundaries 2. 25 % extra spacing for soil having high infiltration and permeability 3. 15 % less spacing for soils having low infiltration and unfavourable crops Depth of impounding h = (Re x V.I. / 50)1/2 Re = 24 Hrs rainfall exess in cm for 10 yrs recurrence interval Or h = (12 x 0.55 / 50)1/2 = rainfall - infiltration interception = 0.36 = 20 - 8 ( 40 % of 20 cm) Say 0.35 m = 12 cm Height of bunds Height of impounding + depth of flow over wasteweir + free board = 0.45 + 0.15 + 0.15 = 0.65 m Cross Section of bund Top width = Ht of bund / 2 = 0.75 / 2 0.33 m Say 0.35 m
Bottom width = 0.38 + 2 ( 1.50 x 0.60 ) = 2.30 m
Cross section = (0.30 + 2.10 )/2 x 0.6 = 0.86 m2 Note : Lateral Bunds at interval of around 100 m Side Bunds / hooks at both the ends Stone Pitching at the end be provided for safe disposal of exess water W A S T E W E I R For the design of the crest lenth of the waste weir following formula is used
1. MAXIMUM DISCHARGE AT WEIR Q = 0.0276 C.I.A Q = Peak rate of discharge C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recurring interval = 20 cm / hour A= Catchment area = 2 Ha 2.000 Therefore Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A. = = 0.3312 Hence L = Q / (1.711.71*h X h 3 /2 ) Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt. L = Lenth of crest in meter = 0.33 / ( 1.71 X (0.15)3/2 ) = 0.33 / 0.105 = 3.15 But Proposed is 3.00 mtr. dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< dqy {kS=Qy 3 gS- vuqizLFk dkV %& 0.86 oxZeh c.M dh izLrkfor yEckbZ 360
Part A Earthen Bund Estimate nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k bdkbZ ek=k Je dqy Je dqy jfuax ehVj 1 Mkxcsfyax 2-5 ls 5 lss-eh- xgjhA (Item No. 157) 720 1.09 1.09 784.8 784.80 2 dBksj feV`Vh esa [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z e; Msflax vkSj [ksnh xbZ feVVh dks 30 eh ?ku ehVj dh nwjh rFkk Ms<+ ehVj mpkbZ rd Mkyus dk dk;ZA (Item No. 189 b)
?ku ehVj 360.00 2.87 0.30 309.60 92.00 92.00 28483.2 28483.20 cht cqokbZ cuk;s x;s rhu ifDr;ks es yxkuk fjt ijA eh 3 (item no. 158) 1080 0.65 0.65 702 702.00 u- 4 uksfPkax }kjk ns'kh ccwy yxkuk (item no. 159) 18000 0.26 0.26 4680 4680.00 [kkn feV~Vh bR;knh o ?kkl cht ;Fkk /kke.k LVkbyksa vkfn dh lIykbZ 5 - LS 375.00 ;ksx ;ksx 34652 35385.00 ;ksx 34652.00 35385.00 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 1061.55 dqy ;ksx 36447.00 ykxr Je en esa ------95.1% 34650.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------4.9% 1800.00 dqy ykxr 36450.00
0.35
:1 0.65
2.30 m 0.15 0.30 (1.0') 2.87 (8.0') Part B Ramp cum Waste weir Estimate No. Of Wasteweir Proposed 1 No. nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k bdkbZ ek=k Je dqy Je dqy uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa l[r feêh esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry 6 dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) ?kueh ?kueh TW of pitching 1 2 3.60 0.30 0.30 0.65 99.00 99.00 64.15 64.15 7 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& HW 1 1 3.00 2.20 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 6.60 Side 1 2 0.90 2.50 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 4.50 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 11.10 124.10 269.00 1377.51 2985.90 1656.80 3631.96 ;ksx 1656.80 3631.96 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 108.96 dqy ;ksx 3741.00 ykxr Je en esa 44.4% 1660.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa 55.6% 2080.00 dqy ykxr 3740.00 Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Total Cost Labour Material Total Part A Cost for Earthen Bund 34650.00 1800.00 36450.00 Part B Cost for Waste weir 1660.00 2080.00 3740.00 Total Cost For Block A 36310.00 3880.00 40190.00 90.3% 9.7% Cost per Ha 13396.667 Say Rs 13000 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------Type-II Design of Vegetative Bund For Block B Area of Block A 2 Ha Proposed Lenth of Earthen Bund 300 M Highest Contour Level Difference Between Contour 0 M Lowest Contour Level Length of Travel M Slope as per Contour Map % Average Slope of Land % S = 2.000 Soil Type Loamy Sand/Clay/bvlack Cotton Soil 0.40 Side Slope of Bund 1.5 : 1 Slope of Seepage Line 5 : 1 0.80 Maximum 24 Hrs rainfall for 10 year of recurrence interval 20 cm Infiltration Capacity 40% 2.80 Spacing of Contour vegetative bunds Vertical Interval V.I. 1. C.E. Ramsar 's Formula = 0.305(S X+Y) X = Rainfall Factor for Scanty rainfall region = 0.80 V.I. = 0.305(S x 0.8+1) Y = Soil infiltration & Vegetative cover factor = 1.0 (for Below average, Low coverage area) = 0.79 So V.I. considered = 0.80 m Horizontal Interval H.I. H.I. = V.I./S x 100 = = 40.00 Say = 40.00 m Note 1. 20 % deviation in V.I. To accommodate field boundaries 2. 25 % extra spacing for soil having high infiltration and permeability 3. 15 % less spacing for soils having low infiltration and unfavourable crops Depth of impounding h = (Re x V.I. / 50)1/2 Re = 24 Hrs rainfall exess in cm for 10 yrs recurrence interval Or h = (12 x 0.7 / 50)1/2 = rainfall - infiltration interception = 0.44 = 20 - 8 ( 40 % of 20 cm) Say 0.45 m = 12 cm Height of bunds Height of impounding + depth of flow over wasteweir + free board = 0.45 + 0.15 + 0.20 = 0.80 m Cross Section of bund Top width = Ht of bund / 2 = 0.80 / 2 0.40 m Say 0.40 m Bottom width = 0.40 + 2 ( 1.50 x 0.60 ) = 2.80 m Cross section = (0.30 + 2.10 )/2 x 0.6 = 1.28 m2 Note : Lateral Bunds at interval of around 100 m Side Bunds / hooks at both the ends Stone Pitching at the end be provided for safe disposal of exess water dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< W A S T E W E I R For the design of the crest lenth of the waste weir following formula is used 1. MAXIMUM DISCHARGE AT WEIR Q = 0.0276 C.I.A Q = Peak rate of discharge C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recurring interval = 20 cm / hour A= Catchment area = 2.000 Ha 2.000 Therefore Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A. = = 0.3312 Hence L = Q / 1.71*h(1.71 X h 3 /2 ) Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt. L = Lenth of crest in meter = 0.33 / ( 1.71 X (0.15)3/2 ) = 0.33 / 0.105 = 3.15 But Proposed is 3.00 mtr. dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------0 xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------0 dqy {kS=Qy Cykd , 2 gS- vuqizLFk dkV %& 1.28 oxZeh c.M dh izLrkfor yEckbZ 300 Part A Earthen Bund Estimate nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k bdkbZ ek=k Je dqy Je dqy jfuax ehVj 1 Mkxcsfyax 2-5 ls 5 lss-eh- xgjhA (Item No. 157) 600 1.09 1.09 654 654.00 2 dBksj feV`Vh esa [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z e; Msflax vkSj [ksnh xbZ feVVh dks ?ku ehVj 30 eh dh nwjh rFkk Ms<+ ehVj mpkbZ rd Mkyus dk dk;ZA (Item No. 189 b) ?ku ehVj 300.00 4.27 0.30 384.00 92.00 92.00 35328 35328.00 cht cqokbZ cuk;s x;s rhu ifDr;ks es yxkuk fjt ijA jfuax ehVj 3 (item no. 158) 900 0.65 0.65 585 585.00 u- 4 /kkl@ taxykrh cht dh uskfpax@ fMcÇYkx dj cqokbZ djuk ( item No 159 ) 15000 0.26 0.26 3900 3900.00 5 [kkn feV~Vh bR;knh o /kkl cht ;Fkk /kke.k LVkbyksa vkfn dh lIykbZ - LS 250.00 ;ksx ;ksx 40469 41017.00 0 ;ksx 40469.00 41017.00 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 1230.51 dqy ;ksx 42248.00 ykxr Je en esa ------95.8% 40470.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------4.2% 1780.00 dqy ykxr 42250.00 0.40 1.5 : 1 :1 0.80 2.80 m 0.15 0.30 (1.0') 4.27 (8.0') Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Total Cost Labour Material Total Part A Cost for Earthen Bund 40470.00 1780.00 42250.00 Part B Cost for Waste weir 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Cost For Block A 40470.00 1780.00 42250.00 Cost per Ha 21000 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------ Design of Vegetative Bund For Block D Type-III Area of Block D 2 Ha Proposed Lenth of Earthen Bund M Highest Contour Level 550 Difference Between Contour 1 M Lowest Contour Level 549 Length of Travel 100 M Slope as per Contour Map % Average Slope of Land % S = 1.00 Soil Type Loamy Sand/Clay/bvlack Cotton Soil 0.38 Side Slope of Bund 1.5 : 1 Slope of Seepage Line 5 : 1 0.75 Maximum 24 Hrs rainfall for 10 year of recurrence interval 20 cm Infiltration Capacity 40% 2.63 Spacing of Contour vegetative bunds Vertical Interval V.I. 1. C.E. Ramsar 's Formula = 0.305(S X+Y) X = Rainfall Factor for Scanty rainfall region = 0.80 V.I. = 0.305(S x 0.8+1) Y = Soil infiltration & Vegetative cover factor = 1.0 (for Below average, Low coverage area) = 0.55 So V.I. considered = 0.80 m Horizontal Interval H.I. H.I. = V.I./S x 100 = = 80.00 Say = 40.00 m Note 1. 20 % deviation in V.I. To accommodate field boundaries 2. 25 % extra spacing for soil having high infiltration and permeability 3. 15 % less spacing for soils having low infiltration and unfavourable crops Depth of impounding h = (Re x V.I. / 50)1/2 Re = 24 Hrs rainfall exess in cm for 10 yrs recurrence interval Or h = (12 x 0.55 / 50)1/2 = rainfall - infiltration interception = 0.44 = 20 - 8 ( 40 % of 20 cm) Say 0.45 m = 12 cm Height of bunds Height of impounding + depth of flow over wasteweir + free board = 0.30 + 0.15 + 0.15 = 0.75 m Cross Section of bund Top width = Ht of bund / 2 = 0.60 / 2 0.38 m Say 0.38 m Bottom width = 0.38 + 2 ( 1.50 x 0.70 ) = 2.63 m Cross section = (0.38 + 2.48 )/2 x 0.7 = 1.13 m2 Note : Lateral Bunds at interval of around 100 m Side Bunds / hooks at both the ends Stone Pitching at the end be provided for safe disposal of exess water dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< W A S T E W E I R For the design of the crest length of the waste weir following formula is used 1. MAXIMUM DISCHARGE AT WEIR Q = 0.0276 C.I.A Q = Peak rate of discharge C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recurring interval = 20 cm / hour A= Catchment area = 2 Ha 2.000 Therefore Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A. = = 0.3312 Hence L = Q 1.71*h/ (1.71 X 3h /2 ) Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt. L = Lenth of crest in meter = 0.33 / ( 1.71 X (0.15)3/2 ) = 0.33 / 0.105 = 3.15 But Proposed is 3.00 mtr. dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa cfUMax fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------0 xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------0 dqy {kS=Qy 2 gS- vuqizLFk dkV %& 1.13 oxZeh c.M dh izLrkfor yEckbZ 272 Part A Earthen Bund Estimate nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k bdkbZ ek=k Je dqy Je dqy jfuax ehVj 1 Mkxcsfyax 2-5 ls 5 lss-eh- xgjhA (Item No. 157) 544 1.09 1.09 592.96 592.96 2 dBksj feV`Vh esa [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z e; Msflax vkSj [ksnh xbZ feVVh dks 30 ?ku ehVj eh dh nwjh rFkk Ms<+ ehVj mpkbZ rd Mkyus dk dk;ZA (Item No. 189 b) ?ku ehVj 272.00 3.77 0.30 307.36 85.00 85.00 26125.6 26125.60 cht cqokbZ cuk;s x;s rhu ifDr;ks es yxkuk fjt ijA jeh 3 (item no. 158) 816 0.65 0.65 530.4 530.40 uksfPkax }kjk ns'kh ccwy yxkuk u- 4 (item no. 159) 13600 0.26 0.26 3536 3536.00 [kkn feV`Vh bR;knh o /kkl cht ;Fkk /kke.k LVkbyksa vkfn dh lIykbZ 5 - LS 250.00 ;ksx ;ksx 30786.96 31306.96 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 939.21 dqy ;ksx 32246.00 ykxr Je en esa ------95.5% 30790.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------4.5% 1460.00 dqy ykxr 32250.00 0.38 :1 0.75 2.63 m 0.15 0.30 (1.0') 3.77 (8.0') Part B Ramp cum Waste weir Estimate No. Of Wasteweir Proposed 1 No. nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k bdkbZ ek=k Je dqy Je dqy uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa l[r feêh esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] 6 ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) TW of ?kueh ?kueh pitching 1 2 3.60 0.30 0.30 0.65 99.00 99.00 64.15 64.15 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& HW 1 1 3.00 2.20 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 6.60 Side 1 2 0.90 2.50 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 4.50 oXkZehVj oXkZehVj 11.10 124.10 269.00 1377.51 2985.90 ;ksx 1656.80 3631.96 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 108.96 dqy ;ksx 3741.00 ykxr Je en esa 44.4% 1660.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa 55.6% 2080.00 dqy ykxr 3740.00 Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Total Cost Labour Material Total Part A Cost for Earthen Bund 30790.00 1460.00 32250.00 Part B Cost for Waste weir 1660.00 2080.00 3740.00 Total Cost For Block A 32450.00 3540.00 35990.00 Cost per Ha 17995 Say Rs 18000/- dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa iRFkj dh Vsjsl ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------ Design of Stone wall Terrace Area of 1 Ha Proposed Length of Stone wall terrace 40 M Highest Difference Between Contour 0 M Lowest Contour Level Length of Travel M Slope as per Contour Map 1.50 % Average Slope of Land % S = 3.00 Soil Type Loamy Sand/Clay/bvlack Cotton Soil Earth Filling 1 : 1 sl Horizontal Interval H.I. The Horizontal slope depend upon the height of Retaining wall and Slope H.I. = (H1+H2)X100/S H1 Depth of Excavation in upper part of terrace = 50 H2 Height of fill in Lower part of terrace = S Slope in Percantage Say = 50.00 m Design Criteria for Stone wall terrace Top width = 0.4H Base width = 1.4m Depth of Foundation =0.4H H Height of Stone wall as per site condation Say Height of Stone wall terrace 1.2 M 1.2 Top width 0.48 M 0.6 Base width 1.4 M 1.4 Depth of Foundation 0.48 M 0.45 -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % futh ckjkuh [ksr¨a esa iRFkj dh Vsjsl iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------0 xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------0 Assumptios: 1. Height of wall : 1.20 m 3. Top width : 0.60 m 2. Bottom width : 1.40 m 4. Length per Hect : 40 m 5. Depth of Foundation 0.45 m Area of Block B 1 Ha. Total Length of Stone wall terrace 40 M dk;Z fooj.k nj jk'kh dz-l- ek=k bZdkbZ y pkS- ma Je dqy Je dqy 1 uhao Vsªapsp es eqjZe dh [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z] [kqnh gqbZ feêh dk fuLrkj.k rFkk lery djukA (Item No 190c) 1 40.0 1.40 0.45 25.20 m3 108.00 108.00 2721.60 2721.60 miyC/k iRFkj ls lw[kh fpukbZ dh Qsflax nhokj cukukA 1 (Item no. 138) Found. 40.0 1.40 0.45 25.20 S/s 40.0 (1.4+0.6)/2 1.20 48.00 73.20 m3 304.00 304.00 14592.00 14592.00 3 iRFkj dh nhokj ij LFkkuh; :i ls miyC/k feV~Vh ls 2 ls 3 lseh ijr [kksn dj tekukA (Item no. 9 Annexure II) 40.00 40.00 m 7.35 7.35 294.00 294.00 ;ksx 17648.20 17607.60 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 528.23 dqy ;ksx 18136.00 ykxr Je en esa ------97.3% 17650.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------2.7% 490.00 dqy ykxr 18140.00 Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Say 18000 / Hac 0.60 2 ls 3 lseh feV~Vh dh ijr 1.20 Earth Filling GL 1.5M 0.45 1.40 CROSS SECTION OF STONE WALL FENCING dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % Qynkj ikS/kkjksi.k dk;Z ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------Assumptions: Area for plantation = 0.50 Ha No. of Plants = 144 Nos. ykHkkFkhZ }kjk fd;s tkus okyk ifj;kstuk jkf'k ls djkoks tkus fooj.k nj dz- la- ek=k bdkbZ dk;Z dh ykxr okys dk;Z dh ykxr la- y- pkS- Åa- Je dqy Je dqy Je dqy Fkksj Qaflax dk;Z 1 (300 m / 0.5 ha) 80 lseh yEcs Fkksj ds M.Ms dh lIykbZ o dfVax bR;kfnA A (Item no. 166) 2080 Nos 0.809 1.310 0.00 0.00 1682.72 2724.80 cSy xkMh ls 5 fdeh nwjh rd Fkksj MUMk ifjoguA B (Item no. 167) 2080 Nos 2.100 2.100 0.00 0.00 4368.00 4368.00 Fkksj ds M.Ms [kkyh djkbZ o HkjkbZ dk;ZA C (Item no. 168) 2080 Nos 0.327 0.327 0.00 0.00 680.16 680.16 Fkksj fjgsaMfyax dk;Z 200ls 500 ehVjA D (Item no. 169) 2080 Nos 0.833 0.833 0.00 0.00 1732.64 1732.64 E 80 lseh- yEcs Fkksj ds MUMs dks 15 lseh- nwjh ij U;ure~ 15 lseh xgjkbZ ds [kM~Ms esa yxkukA (Item no. 170) 312.0 m 10.19 10.19 0.00 0.00 3179.28 3179.28 ikS/kkjksi.k gsrq [kM~Mks dh Mkx cSfyaxA 2 (Item no. 142) 0.00 0.00 144 144.00 No 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 77.76 77.76 uhao Vsªapsp es l[r feêh dh [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z] [kqnh gqbZ feêh dk fuLrkj.k rFkk lery djukA 3 (Item no. 2 b) 144 0.90 0.90 0.90 104.98 M3 99.00 99.00 0.00 0.00 10392.6 10392.6 vfrfjDr tksMs 10 izfr'kr fc[kjs dk;Z gsrwA 4 (Item no. 144) 10.498 M3 99.00 99.00 0.00 0.00 1039.26 1039.26 [kksns gq, x<~ 144 24 3456.00 No 0.00 1.477 0.00 0.00 0.00 5104.51 14 ikS/kkjksi.k LFky ij flj ij ikuh ifjogu gsrw 200 ehVj izkjfEHkd nwjh ds Ik'pkr izR;sd 100 ehVj nwjh ds fy;s vfrfjDr pktsZt 500 ehVj rdA (Item no. 150) 144 24 3456.00 No 0.12 0.12 414.72 414.72 0.00 0.00 iks/kksas dks miyC/k ikuh fiykuk 15 yh- izfr ikS/kk 12 ckjA 15 @ (Item no. 149) 144 24 3456.00 No 1.91 1.91 6600.96 6600.96 0.00 0.00 16 15 ls-eh- xgjkbZ rd rFkk 45 ls- eh- v)ZO;kl rd ikS/kksa dh fujkbZ xqMkbZ djukA ¼ 3 ckj ½ (item no. 151) 144 12 1728.00 No 1.30 1.30 2246.40 2246.40 0.00 0.00 ;ksx 10500.48 11958.93 24868.93 39763.52 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 1192.91 dqy ;ksx 11959.00 40956.00 ykxr Je en esa ------88% 10500.00 60.7% 24870.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------12% 1458.00 39.3% 16090.00 dqy ykxr 11958.00 40960.00 Labour Material Total % Contribution Expenditure by Benificries 10500.00 1458.00 11958.00 22.60 Expenditure by Project 24870.00 16090.00 40960.00 77.40 Total Expenditure 35370.00 17548.00 52918.00 Say Rs 41000 / per Hac Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % pkjkxkg fodkl dk;Z ¼lery {ks= ds fy,½ iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % ------Per Hect 800 m Unit cost 16490 Width 0.6 m Depth 0.20 m Seeding 8 kg Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy lh- oh- ,p- dk;Z ¼ 800 jfuax ehVj Áfr gSDVj½ MEihysoy ls 10 ehVj dh vkMh nwjh rd dUVqj ykbZUl dk 1 ysvkmV nsukA (item No.156 a) 0 800 0 m 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.00 2 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA (Item No.157) 2 800 1600 m 1.09 1.09 1744.00 1744.00 3 uhao Vsªapsp es feêh dh [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z] [kqnh gqbZ feêh dk fuLrkj.k rFkk lery djukA 800 0.60 0.20 96 m3 ¼v½ l[r feêh esa 60% (item No 2 b ) 57.6 m3 99.00 99.00 5702.40 5702.40 ¼c½ eqjZe 3 40% (item No 190 c ) 38.4 m 108.00 108.00 4147.20 4147.20 4 cuk;s x;s fjt ij 3 ykbu¨a esa cht cqokbZA (Item No.158) 3 800 2400 m 0.65 0.65 1560.00 1560.00 ?kkl cht lIykbZ djukA 5 8 8 kg 0.00 60.00 0.00 480.00 6 taxykrh cht dh uskfpax@ fMcÇYkx dj cqokbZ djukA (Item No.159) 3 800 2400 Notch 0.26 0.26 624.00 624.00 taxykrh cht lIykbZ djukA 7 (Item No.159) 8 Kg L.S. 240.00 14497.60 Äkl chtkj¨i.k ¼v¨ojlhfMax½ ¼ 80% {©«k½ VªsDVj dYVhosVj }kjk tqrkbZ ,oa ?kkl dk fNM+dko ?kkl dh ek=k 6 ls 8 fdyks izfr gS- 8 ¼cht ykxr vfr-½ (item No.164) 0.8 0.8 Hac 310 1294.0 248.00 1035.20 ?kkl cht lIykbZ djukA 9 8 8 Kg 0.00 60.00 0.00 480.00 1515.20 ;ksx 14025.60 16012.80 ;ksx 14025.60 16012.80 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 480.38 dqy ;ksx 16493.00 ykxr Je en esa ------85.1% 14030.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------14.9% 2460.00 dqy ykxr 16490.00 Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer ckgjh {kS«k Say 16000 / hac Bund GL 8 - 10 m dUVwj VªSUp dUVwj VªSUp dUVwj VªSUp dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % pkjkxkg fodkl dk;Z ¼lery {ks= ds fy,½ ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------DCB C.S. CVH PLANTATION TW 2.1 m Per Hect 800 m Plants / hect 400 Nos BW 0.9 m Width 0.6 m Size 0.45 x o.45 x 0.45 Depth 1.2 m Depth 0.20 m No of watering 14 Nos Per Hect 125 m Seeding 8 kg Vermi / plant 0.250 kg Thor danda 833 nos. Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy QSaflax dk;Z ¼100 jfuax ehVj Áfr gSDVj½ 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 1 (Item No 157 ) 2 125 250.0 m 1.09 1.09 272.50 272.50 cU/k cukus gsrq feêh dk dk;Z ¼1-575 oxZ ehVj dzkl lsD'ku½ 2 1 125 1.5 1.2 225.0 m3 ¼v½ l[r feêh esa 40% (item No 2 b ) 90.00 m3 99.00 99.00 8910.00 8910.00 ¼c½ eqjZe esa 30% (item No 190 c ) 67.50 m3 108.00 108.00 7290.00 7290.00 ¼l½ fo/kfVr pV`Vku esa 30% (item No 2 c ) 67.50 m3 146.00 146.00 9855.00 9855.00 3 80 lseh yEcs Fkksj ds M.Ms dh lIykbZ o dfVax bR;kfn (Item No 166 ) 833 No 0.809 1.31 4 cSy xkMh ls 5 fdeh nwjh rd Fkksj MUMk 833 No 2.10 2.10 ifjoguA (Item No 167 E) Fkksj ds M.Ms [kkyh djkbZ o HkjkbZ dk;ZA 5 833 No 0.327 0.327 (Item No 168 ) Fkksj fjgsaMfyax dk;Z 200ls 500 ehVjA 6 (Item 833 No 0.833 0.833 No 169 ) 7 80 lseh- yEcs Fkksj ds MUMs dks 15 lseh- nwjh ij U;ure~ 15 lseh xgjkbZ ds [kM~Ms esa 125 m 10.19 10.19 yxkukA (Item No 170 ) 8 /kkl@ taxykrh cht dh uskfpax@ fMcÇYkx 250 m 0.26 0.26 65.00 65.00 dj cqokbZ djukA (item No 159 ) lh- oh- ,p- dk;Z ¼ 800 jfuax ehVj Áfr gSDVj½ 9 MEihysoy ls 10 ehVj dh vkMh nwjh rd dUVqj ykbZUl dk ysvkmV nsukA (item No.156 a) 1 800 800 m 0.34 0.34 272.00 272.00 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 10 (Item No.157) 2 800 1600 m 1.09 1.09 1744.00 1744.00 11 uhao Vsªapsp es feêh dh [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z] [kqnh gqbZ feêh dk fuLrkj.k rFkk lery djukA 800 0.60 0.20 96 m3 ¼v½ l[r feêh esa 60% (item No 2 b ) 57.6 m3 99.00 99.00 5702.40 5702.40 ¼c½ eqjZe 3 40% (item No 190 c ) 38.4 m 108.00 108.00 4147.20 4147.20 cuk;s x;s fjt ij 3 ykbu¨a esa cht cqokbZA 12 (Item No.158) 3 800 2400 m 0.65 0.65 1560.00 1560.00 13 /kkl cht lIykbZ djukA 8 8 kg 0.00 60.00 0.00 480.00 taxykrh cht dh uskfpax@ fMcÇYkx dj cqokbZ djukA 14 (Item No.159) 3 800 2400 Notch 0.26 0.26 624.00 624.00 taxykrh cht lIykbZ djukA 15 (Item No.159) 8 Kg L.S. 240.00 Äkl chtkj¨i.k ¼v¨ojlhfMax½ ¼ {©«k½ 80% 16 VªsDVj dYVhosVj }kjk tqrkbZ ,oa ?kkl dk fNM+dko ?kkl dh ek=k 6 ls 8 fdyks izfr gS- ¼cht ykxr vfr-½ (item No.164) 0.8 0.8 Hac 310.0 1294.0 248.00 1035.20 17 /kkl cht lIykbZ djukA 8 8 Kg 0.00 60.00 0.00 480.00 ikS/kkjksi.k ¼ 400 ikS/ks izfr gSDVs;j ½ ls-eh- eki ds x<~ 2 400 800 No 0.60 0.60 480.00 480.00 15 dhVuk'kdnok lIykbZ djukA 2 400 0.002 1.60 Ltr 0.00 300.00 0.00 480.00 ikS/kksa dk [kkn ls mipkj djukA 16 (Item No.146) 2 400 800 No 0.29 0.29 232.00 232.00 [kkn lIykbZ djukA 17 Vermi-Compost (Annex. 2 item no 3) 2 400 0.25 200 Kg 0.00 3.00 0.00 600.00 18 taxykrh ikS/ks lIykbZ djukA 440 No 0.00 4.50 0.00 1980.00 (Including 10 % Wastage) ikS/k'kkyk ls o`{kkjksi.k LFky rd 40 fdeh rd dh nwjh ds fy;s ikS/kksa 19 dh ¼v½ lkekU; tehu 30% 120 No 1.91 1.91 229.20 229.20 ¼c½ iFkjhyh tehu 20% 80 No 2.60 2.60 208.00 208.00 27 iqjkus Fkkoyksa dh ejEer djukA (Item no. 153) 1 200 200 No 1.10 1.10 220.00 220.00 28 ikS/kksa dh izwfuax djuk ,oa cMs drju dks ckM ij MkyukA (Item no. 139) 2 400 800 No 1.6700 1.6700 1336.00 1336.00 29 15 ls-eh- xgjkbZ rd rFkk 45 ls- eh- v)ZO;kl rd ikS/kksa dh fujkbZ xqMkbZ djukA (Item no. 151) 3 400 1200 No 1.30 1.30 1560.00 1560.00 pkjkxkg dh pkSdhnkjh dk dk;Z ¼ 30 fnu 12 ekg rhu o"kZ izfr 25 gS-½ 30 2X Rs 147 X X X 12700.80 12700.80 xsi fQfyx tksMus ij ¼vkbVe l- 3&7] 11&27½ 31 20% 4272.08 8164.02 ;ksx 31894.08 102839.04 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 3085.17 dqy ;ksx 105924.00 ykxr Je en esa ------30.1% 31890.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------69.9% 74030.00 dqy ykxr 105920.00 Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Say 1.06 lac / Hac pkjkxkg {kS«k ckgjh {kS«k Bund 2.10 m GL 8 - 10 m 1.10 Ditch dUVwj VªSUp 0.90 m CROSS SECTION OF DITCH CUM BUND FENCING dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- Qynkj ikS/kkjksi.k dk;Z ¼ 0-40 ½ ;kstuk dk;Z dk uke % Hac & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------Assumptions: Area for plantation = 0.40 Ha No. of Plants = 100 Nos. ykHkkFkhZ }kjk fd;s tkus okyk ifj;kstuk jkf'k ls djkoks tkus fooj.k nj dz- la- ek=k bdkbZ dk;Z dh ykxr okys dk;Z dh ykxr la- y- pkS- Åa- Je dqy Je dqy Je dqy Fkksj Qaflax dk;Z 1 (300 m / 0.5 ha) 80 lseh yEcs Fkksj ds M.Ms dh lIykbZ o dfVax bR;kfnA A (Item no. 166) 2080 Nos 0.809 1.310 1682.72 2724.80 0.00 0.00 cSy xkMh ls 5 fdeh nwjh rd Fkksj MUMk ifjoguA B (Item no. 167) 2080 Nos 2.100 2.100 4368.00 4368.00 0.00 0.00 Fkksj ds M.Ms [kkyh djkbZ o HkjkbZ dk;ZA C (Item no. 168) 2080 Nos 0.327 0.327 680.16 680.16 0.00 0.00 Fkksj fjgsaMfyax dk;Z 200ls 500 ehVjA D (Item no. 169) 2080 Nos 0.833 0.833 1732.64 1732.64 0.00 0.00 E 80 lseh- yEcs Fkksj ds MUMs dks 15 lseh- nwjh ij U;ure~ 15 lseh xgjkbZ ds [kM~Ms esa yxkukA (Item no. 170) 312.0 m 10.19 10.19 3179.28 3179.28 0.00 0.00 ikS/kkjksi.k gsrq [kM~Mks dh Mkx cSfyaxA 2 (Item no. 142) 0.00 0.00 100 100.00 No 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 54.00 54.00 uhao Vsªapsp es l[r feêh dh [kqnkbZ dk dk;Z] [kqnh gqbZ feêh dk fuLrkj.k rFkk lery djukA 3 (Item no. 2 b) 100 0.90 0.90 0.90 72.90 M3 99.00 99.00 7217.10 7217.10 0.0 0.0 vfrfjDr tksMs 10 izfr'kr fc[kjs dk;Z gsrwA 4 (Item no. 144) 7.290 M3 99.00 99.00 721.71 721.71 0.0 0.0 [kksns gq, x<~ 100 24 2400.00 No 0.00 1.477 0.00 0.00 0.00 3544.80 14 ikS/kkjksi.k LFky ij flj ij ikuh ifjogu gsrw 200 ehVj izkjfEHkd nwjh ds Ik'pkr izR;sd 100 ehVj nwjh ds fy;s vfrfjDr pktsZt 500 ehVj rdA (Item no. 150) 100 24 2400.00 No 0.12 0.12 288.00 288.00 0.00 0.00 iks/kksas dks miyC/k ikuh fiykuk 15 yh- izfr ikS/kk 12 ckjA 15 @ (Item no. 149) 100 24 2400.00 No 1.91 1.91 4584.00 4584.00 0.00 0.00 16 15 ls-eh- xgjkbZ rd rFkk 45 ls- eh- v)ZO;kl rd ikS/kksa dh fujkbZ xqMkbZ djukA ¼ 3 ckj ½ (item no. 151) 100 12 1200.00 No 1.30 1.30 1560.00 1560.00 0.00 0.00 ;ksx 27203.61 29258.51 436.00 9095.80 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 272.87 dqy ;ksx 29259.00 9369.00 ykxr Je en esa ------93% 27200.00 4.7% 440.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------7% 2055.00 95.3% 8930.00 dqy ykxr 29255.00 9370.00 Labour Material Total % Contribution Expenditure by Benificries 27200.00 2055.00 29255.00 75.74 Expenditure by Project 440.00 8930.00 9370.00 24.26 Total Expenditure 27640.00 10985.00 38625.00 Say Rs 9500 / per Hac Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k TYPE I ;kstuk & tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % lqjlqjk Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 90.00 eh 5 Side Slope U / S 2.5 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 1.50 eh 6 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Height of Bund eh 4 Avg. Bottom Width 4.00 nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA (Item No. 157) 180.000 eh- 1.09 1.09 196.20 196.20 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA (Item No. 96) 360.000 o-eh- 1.90 1.90 684.00 684.00 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 27.000 Ä-eh- 93.00 93.00 2511.00 2511.00 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer. Say 0.22 lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< Abst. P7 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % [kMhu fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr %fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Ø-l- dk;Z uki ek=k 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA 90.00 X 2 = 180.00 180.0 eh- 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA 90.00 X 4.00 = 360.00 360.0 o-eh- 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 0.50 X 90.0 X 4.00 X 0.15 = 27.000 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA 27.000 27 Ä-eh- 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] 1 X 0.0 X 0.00 = 0.000 1 X X = 0.000 12.863 12.86 o-eh- dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr- fd'kux< Det Estt P8,9 d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k Earth work chart Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum 0 8.40 8.40 0.00 1.50 3 2.0 1.50 0.00 0 0 0 10 8.30 0.10 2.00 0.17 0.09 10 0.87 20 7.80 0.60 4.50 1.80 0.99 10 9.88 30 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 2.59 10 25.88 40 7.60 0.80 5.50 2.80 3.09 10 30.88 50 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 3.09 10 30.88 60 7.60 0.80 5.50 2.80 3.09 10 30.88 70 7.80 0.60 4.50 1.80 2.30 10 23.00 80 8.20 0.20 2.50 0.40 1.10 10 11.00 90 8.35 0.05 1.75 0.08 0.24 10 2.41 90 39.75 165.66 Average base width = 4.00 dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< E_w chart P10 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k TYPE II ;kstuk & tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % lqjlqjk Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 135.00 eh 5 Side Slope U / S 2.5 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 1.50 eh 6 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Height of Bund eh 4 Avg. Bottom Width 4.10 nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA (Item No. 157) 270.000 eh- 1.09 1.09 294.30 294.30 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA (Item No. 96) 553.500 o-eh- 1.90 1.90 1051.65 1051.65 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 41.513 Ä-eh- 93.00 93.00 3860.66 3860.66 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora, Dist Ajmer. Say 0.35 lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< Abst. P7 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % [kMhu fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr %fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Ø-l- dk;Z uki ek=k 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA 135.00 X 2 = 270.00 270.0 eh- 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA 135.00 X 4.10 = 553.50 553.5 o-eh- 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 0.50 X 135.0 X 4.10 X 0.15 = 41.513 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA 41.513 41.5125 Ä-eh- 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] 1 X 0.0 X 0.00 = 0.000 1 X X = 0.000 20.869 20.87 o-eh- dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr- fd'kux< Det Estt P8,9 d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k Earth work chart Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum 0 8.40 8.40 0.00 1.50 3 2.0 1.50 0.00 0 0 0 15 8.30 0.10 2.00 0.17 0.09 15 1.31 30 7.80 0.60 4.50 1.80 0.99 15 14.81 45 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 2.59 15 38.81 60 7.60 0.80 5.50 2.80 3.09 15 46.31 75 7.40 1.00 6.50 4.00 3.40 15 51.00 90 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 3.69 15 55.31 105 7.80 0.60 4.50 1.80 2.59 15 38.81 120 8.20 0.20 2.50 0.40 1.10 15 16.50 135 8.35 0.05 1.75 0.08 0.24 15 3.61 135 40.75 266.48 Average base width = 4.10 dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< E_w chart P10 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k TYPE III ;kstuk & tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % lqjlqjk Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 180.00 eh 5 Side Slope U / S 2.5 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 1.50 eh 6 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Height of Bund eh 4 Avg. Bottom Width 4.60 nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA (Item No. 157) 360.000 eh- 1.09 1.09 392.40 392.40 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA (Item No. 96) 828.000 o-eh- 1.90 1.90 1573.20 1573.20 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 62.100 Ä-eh- 93.00 93.00 5775.30 5775.30 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora, Dist Ajmer. Say 0.62 Lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< Abst. P7 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % [kMhu fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr %fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Ø-l- dk;Z uki ek=k 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA 180.00 X 2 = 360.00 360.0 eh- 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA 180.00 X 4.60 = 828.00 828.0 o-eh- 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 0.50 X 180.0 X 4.60 X 0.15 = 62.100 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA 62.100 62.1 Ä-eh- 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] 1 X 0.0 X 0.00 = 0.000 1 X X = 0.000 36.750 36.75 o-eh- dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr- fd'kux< Det Estt P8,9 d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k Earth work chart Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum 0 8.50 8.50 0.00 1.50 3 2.0 1.50 0.00 0 0 0 20 8.30 0.20 2.50 0.40 0.20 20 4.00 40 7.80 0.70 5.00 2.28 1.34 20 26.75 60 7.50 1.00 6.50 4.00 3.14 20 62.75 80 7.60 0.90 6.00 3.38 3.69 20 73.75 100 7.20 1.30 8.00 6.18 4.78 20 95.50 120 7.50 1.00 6.50 4.00 5.09 20 101.75 140 7.80 0.70 5.00 2.28 3.14 20 62.75 160 8.20 0.30 3.00 0.68 1.48 20 29.50 180 8.50 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.34 20 6.75 180 45.50 463.50 Average base width = 4.60 dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< E_w chart P10 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k TYPE IV ;kstuk & tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % lqjlqjk Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 270.00 eh 5 Side Slope U / S 2.5 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 1.50 eh 6 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Height of Bund eh 4 Avg. Bottom Width 5.10 nj jkf'k Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA (Item No. 157) 540.000 eh- 1.09 1.09 588.60 588.60 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA (Item No. 96) 1377.000 o-eh- 1.90 1.90 2616.30 2616.30 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 103.275 Ä-eh- 93.00 93.00 9604.58 9604.58 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] Rates are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora, Dist Ajmer. Say 1.12 lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< Abst. P7 dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l fd'kux<]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % [kMhu fueZk.k iapk;r lfefr %fd'kux< xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Ø-l- dk;Z uki ek=k 1 c.M dk MkxcsyA 270.00 X 2 = 540.00 540.0 eh- 2 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus lesrA 270.00 X 5.10 = 1377.00 1377.0 o-eh- 3 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd yhM o 0.50 X 270.0 X 5.10 X 0.15 = 103.275 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA 103.275 103.275 Ä-eh- 4 feêh o ck/ka cukus dk dk;Z 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] 1 X 0.0 X 0.00 = 0.000 1 X X = 0.000 70.088 70.09 o-eh- dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr- fd'kux< Det Estt P8,9 d`f"k Hkwfe esa [kMhu fueZk.k Earth work chart Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum 0 8.40 8.40 0.00 1.50 3 2.0 1.50 0.00 0 0 0 30 8.20 0.20 2.50 0.40 0.20 30 6.00 60 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 1.89 30 56.63 90 7.30 1.10 7.00 4.68 4.03 30 120.75 120 7.00 1.40 8.50 7.00 5.84 30 175.13 150 7.30 1.10 7.00 4.68 5.84 30 175.13 180 7.50 0.90 6.00 3.38 4.03 30 120.75 210 7.60 0.80 5.50 2.80 3.09 30 92.63 240 7.90 0.50 4.00 1.38 2.09 30 62.63 270 8.25 0.15 2.25 0.28 0.83 30 24.84 270 50.25 834.47 Average base width = 5.10 dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< E_w chart P10 Office of A.En.& PIA IWMP, PS Silora ( Kishangarh).Dist Ajmer DESIGN AND ESTIMATE OF FARM POND- BIG INPUT DATA S.no Particulars Data Unit 1 Bottom Length 7 metres 2 Bottom width 7 metres 3 Top Length 13 metres 4 Top width 13 metres 5 Depth 2 metres 6 Side slope(V:H) 7 Area of Top surface 169.00 Sq Meter 8 Area of Bottom surface 49.00 Sq Meter 9 Average Area 218.00 Sq Meter 10 Total voulme of work 436.00 Cum Use of Storage Water S.no Particulars Measurement Unit 1 Water Requirement per Ha 800 Cum Proposed Area under 2 irrigation metres 3 Crops of the area Estimation of FARM POND Item No Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Quantity Unit Jungle Clearance including uprooting of rank vegetation , grass , brush wood saplings and tree not exceeding 30 cm girth and removing not exceeding 1 50 meter outside the periphery of the area cleared 13 13 169.00 Sqm Earth work in bulk excavation (exceeding 30 cm in depth , 1.5 m width as well as 10 sq m or plan) including disposal of excavated earth lead up to 50 mtr lift up to 50. mtr and lift up to 1.5 m disposaed of 2 soil to be levelled and neatly dressed 436.00 Cum Soft soil 40% 174.40 Cum Hard soil 60% 261.60 Cum 3 Extra for additional lift above 1.5 m 30% 130.80 Cum Extra for every additional lead beyond 50 meters or 4 part there of up to 200 meter for every 50 m lead between 50 to 100 meter 30% 130.80 between 100 to 150 meter 30% 130.80 Vegetation development on bund by 5 notching/dibbling of grass seeds /plants Costing of Farm Pond S.no Particulars Quantity Rate Amount Jungle Clearance including uprooting of rank vegetation , grass , brush wood saplings and tree not exceeding 30 cm girth and removing not exceeding 50 meter outside the 1 periphery of the area cleared 169.00 1.90 321.10 Earth work in bulk excavation (exceeding 30 cm in depth , 1.5 m width as well as 10 sq m or plan) including disposal of excavated earth lead up to 50 mtr lift up to 50. mtr and lift up 2 to 1.5 m disposaed of soil to be levelled and neatly dressed 174.40 Hard soil 174.40 99.00 17265.60 Murrum 261.60 108.00 28252.80 3 Extra for additional lift above 1.5 m 130.80 12.00 1569.60 Extra for every additional lead beyond 50 meters or part 4 there of up to 200 meter for every 50 m lead between 50 to 100 meter 130.80 37.00 4839.60 between 100 to 150 meter 130.80 74.00 9679.20 Vegetation development on bund by notching / dibbling of 5 grass seeds /plants 1500.00 63427.90 ADD 3 % Contigency charges 1902.84 65330.74 Say Rs 65,000/- J.En. A.En. PS Silora PS Silora 9 Farm Pond BIG.xls Office of A.En.& PIA IWMP, PS Silora ( Kishangarh).Dist Ajmer DESIGN AND ESTIMATE OF FARM POND-Small INPUT DATA S.no Particulars Data Unit 1 Bottom Length 5 metres 2 Bottom width 5 metres 3 Top Length 11 metres 4 Top width 11 metres 5 Depth 2 metres 6 Side slope(V:H) 7 Area of Top surface 121 Sq Meter 8 Area of Bottom surface 25 Sq Meter 9 Average Area 146 Sq Meter 10 Total voulme of work 292 Cum Use of Storage Water S.no Particulars Measurement Unit 1 Water Requirement per Ha 800 Cum Proposed Area under 2 irrigation metres 3 Crops of the area Estimation of FARM POND Item No Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Quantity Unit Jungle Clearance including uprooting of rank vegetation , grass , brush wood saplings and tree not exceeding 30 cm girth and removing not exceeding 50 1 meter outside the periphery of the area cleared 11 11 121.00 Sqm Earth work in bulk excavation (exceeding 30 cm in depth , 1.5 m width as well as 10 sq m or plan) including disposal of excavated earth lead up to 50 mtr lift up to 50. mtr and lift up to 1.5 m disposaed of soil to be levelled and neatly 2 dressed 292.00 Cum Soft soil 40% 116.80 Cum Hard soil 60% 175.20 Cum 3 Extra for additional lift above 1.5 m 30% 87.60 Cum Extra for every additional lead beyond 50 meters or part 4 there of up to 200 meter for every 50 m lead between 50 to 100 meter 30% 87.60 between 100 to 150 meter 30% 87.60 Vegetation development on bund by notching/dibbling of 5 grass seeds /plants Costing of Farm Pond S.no Particulars Quantity Rate Amount Jungle Clearance including uprooting of rank vegetation , grass , brush wood saplings and tree not exceeding 30 cm girth and removing not exceeding 50 meter outside the 1 periphery of the area cleared 121.00 1.70 205.70 Earth work in bulk excavation (exceeding 30 cm in depth , 1.5 m width as well as 10 sq m or plan) including disposal of excavated earth lead up to 50 mtr lift up to 50. mtr and lift up 2 to 1.5 m disposaed of soil to be levelled and neatly dressed 116.80 Soft soil 116.80 82.00 9577.60 Hard soil 175.20 99.00 17344.80 3 Extra for additional lift above 1.5 m 87.60 12.00 1051.20 Extra for every additional lead beyond 50 meters or part 4 there of up to 200 meter for every 50 m lead between 50 to 100 meter 87.60 37.00 3241.20 between 100 to 150 meter 87.60 74.00 6482.40 Vegetation development on bund by notching/dibbling of 5 grass seeds /plants 2500.00 40402.90 ADD 3 % Contigency charges 1212.09 41614.99 Say Rs 42,000/- J.En. A.En. PS SILORA PS SILORA 10 Farm Pond.xls dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuekZ.k IWMP Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 90.00 eh 7 Side Slope U / S 3 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 1.50 eh 8 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Max. Height of Bund 1.60 eh 9 Pitching upto ht. of HFL 2.00 4 Max. Bottom Width 9.50 eh 10 Submergence Height 1.00 5 Average Bottom Width 8.00 eh 11 Approx. Capacity cum 6 Approx. Earthwork ?kueh Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 1 (Item No. 157) 2 90.00 180.00 m 1.09 1.09 196.20 196.20 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus 2 lesrA (Item No 96 ) 2 90.00 8.00 1440.00 m2 1.90 1.90 2736.00 2736.00 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd 3 yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 1/2 90.00 8.00 0.15 54.00 m3 93.00 93.00 5022.00 5022.00 feêh dk dk;Z cU/k es ¼lw[kh ;k xhyh½] 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] Total Qty. 1 90.00 4.75 1.10 470.25 m3 ¼v½ l[r feêh esa 80% 376.20 m3 92.00 92.00 34610.40 34610.40 ¼c½ eqjZe 20% 94.05 m3 108.00 108.00 10157.40 10157.40 tksfM+;ss vfrfjDr mBku 5 (Lift) (Item no.3) 30 % of item 4 141.08 m3 12.00 12.00 1692.90 1692.90 tksfM+;ss 50 ehVj vfrfjDr nwjh rd Qsdus ds fy, 6 (Extra Lead) (Item no.4) 30 % of item 2 141.08 m3 37.00 37.00 5219.78 5219.78 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& U/s slope 1 90.00 2.00 180.00 m2 124.10 269.00 22338.00 48420.00 ;ksx 88023.38 126225.00 tksM+s 3 dfUVutsalh % - 3786.75 dqy ;ksx 176046.75 256236.75 ykxr Je en esa ------68.7% 176050.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------31.3% 80190.00 dqy ykxr 256240.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 2.56 lacs uksV %& 1- ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feêh ds ty laj{k.k dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; dk;ZØe vf/kdkjh ia-l- flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ ;kstuk & IWMP 1.50 Dry stone pitching upto HFL TBL D/S Slope 2:1 U/s Slope 3:1 0.60 U/s 1.6 m 0.4 HFL Bund TW 0.45 x 0.45 m FTL 1.0 Atleast 15' berm Borrow pits in steps -1.70 11.20 9.50 PROPOSED X- SECTION OF EARTHEN BUND Surplussing Arrangement (Waste wier) U/s PLAN dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ IWMP Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 100.00 eh 7 Side Slope U / S 3 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 2.00 eh 8 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Max. Height of Bund 1.75 eh 9 Pitching upto ht. of HFL 2.00 4 Max. Bottom Width 10.75 eh 10 Submergence Height 1.00 5 Average Bottom Width 8.00 eh 11 Approx. Capacity cum 6 Approx. Earthwork ?kueh Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 1 (Item No. 157) 2 100.00 200.00 m 1.09 1.09 218.00 218.00 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus 2 lesrA (Item No 96 ) 2 100.00 8.00 1600.00 m2 1.90 1.90 3040.00 3040.00 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd 3 yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 1/2 100.00 8.00 0.15 60.00 m3 93.00 93.00 5580.00 5580.00 feêh dk dk;Z cU/k es ¼lw[kh ;k xhyh½] 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 3.07 lacs uksV %& 1- ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feêh ds ty laj{k.k dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; dk;ZØe vf/kdkjh ia-l- flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------ 2.00 Dry stone pitching upto HFL TBL D/S Slope 2:1 U/s Slope 3:1 0.60 U/s 1.8 m 0.4 HFL Bund TW 0.45 x 0.45 m FTL 1.0 Atleast 15' berm Borrow pits in steps -0.45 11.20 10.75 PROPOSED X- SECTION OF EARTHEN BUND Surplussing Arrangement (Waste wier) U/s PLAN dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark uke------uke------iapk;r lfefr------iapk;r lfefr------dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ IWMP Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 120.00 eh 7 Side Slope U / S 3 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 2.00 eh 8 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Max. Height of Bund 2.00 eh 9 Pitching upto ht. of HFL 2.00 4 Max. Bottom Width 12.00 eh 10 Submergence Height 1.00 5 Average Bottom Width 8.00 eh 11 Approx. Capacity cum 6 Approx. Earthwork ?kueh Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 1 (Item No. 157) 2 120.00 240.00 m 1.09 1.09 261.60 261.60 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus 2 lesrA (Item No 96 ) 2 120.00 8.00 1920.00 m2 1.90 1.90 3648.00 3648.00 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd 3 yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 1/2 120.00 8.00 0.15 72.00 m3 93.00 93.00 6696.00 6696.00 feêh dk dk;Z cU/k es ¼lw[kh ;k xhyh½] 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] ¼v½ l[r feêh esa 80% 720.00 m3 92.00 92.00 66240.00 66240.00 ¼c½ eqjZe 20% 180.00 m3 108.00 108.00 19440.00 19440.00 tksfM+;ss vfrfjDr mBku 5 (Lift) (Item no.3) 3 30 % of item 4 270.00 m 12.00 12.00 3240.00 3240.00 tksfM+;ss 50 ehVj vfrfjDr nwjh rd Qsdus ds fy, 6 (Extra Lead) (Item no.4) 3 30 % of item 2 270.00 m 37.00 37.00 9990.00 9990.00 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& U/s slope 1 120.00 2.00 240.00 m2 124.10 269.00 29784.00 64560.00 ;ksx 147367.20 198302.70 tksM+s 3 dfUVutsalh % - 5949.08 dqy ;ksx 294734.40 402554.48 ykxr Je en esa ------73.2% 294730.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------26.8% 107820.00 dqy ykxr 402550.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 4.02 lacs uksV %& 1- ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feêh ds ty laj{k.k dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; dk;ZØe vf/kdkjh ia-l- flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ ;kstuk & IWMP 2.00 Dry stone pitching upto HFL TBL D/S Slope 2:1 U/s Slope 3:1 0.60 U/s 2.0 m 0.4 HFL Bund TW 0.45 x 0.45 m FTL 1.0 Atleast 15' berm Borrow pits in steps 0.80 11.20 12.00 PROPOSED X- SECTION OF EARTHEN BUND Surplussing Arrangement (Waste wier) U/s PLAN dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ IWMP Assumptions 1 Length of Bund 150.00 eh 7 Side Slope U / S 3 : 1 2 Top Width of Bund 2.00 eh 8 Side Slope D /S 2 : 1 3 Max. Height of Bund 1.75 eh 9 Pitching upto ht. of HFL 2.00 4 Max. Bottom Width 10.75 eh 10 Submergence Height 1.00 5 Average Bottom Width 8.00 eh 11 Approx. Capacity cum 6 Approx. Earthwork ?kueh Ø-l- dk;Z fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ nj jkf'k Je dqy Je dqy 5 ls 7 lseh xgjkbZ dk Mkxcsfyax dk;ZA 1 (Item No. 157) 2 150.00 300.00 m 1.09 1.09 327.00 327.00 taxy dh lQkbZ] Hkkjh >kfM+;ksa rFkk 30 ls-eh- yisV rd ds ikS/kksa dks dkVus 2 lesrA (Item No 96 ) 2 150.00 8.00 2400.00 m2 1.90 1.90 4560.00 4560.00 caUM ds vk/kkj dh dBksj feV~Vh esa csfpax ,ao Msªflax vkfn 30 eh- izkjfEHkd 3 yhM o 1-5 eh- mBku lfgrA (Item No 201b ) 1/2 150.00 8.00 0.15 90.00 m3 93.00 93.00 8370.00 8370.00 feêh dk dk;Z cU/k es ¼lw[kh ;k xhyh½] 15 ls-eh- ijr es Mkyuk] U/s slope 1 150.00 2.00 300.00 m2 124.10 269.00 37230.00 80700.00 ;ksx 163602.75 227272.13 tksM+s 3 dfUVutsalh % - 6818.16 dqy ;ksx 327205.50 461362.41 ykxr Je en esa ------70.9% 327210.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------29.1% 134150.00 dqy ykxr 461360.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 4.61 Lacs uksV %& 1- ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feêh ds ty laj{k.k dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; dk;ZØe vf/kdkjh ia-l- flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ubZ ukMh@rkykc@feVVh dk tylaXzkg.k <+kpk fuek.kZ ;kstuk & IWMP 2.00 Dry stone pitching upto HFL TBL D/S Slope 2:1 U/s Slope 3:1 0.60 U/s 1.8 m 0.4 HFL Bund TW 0.45 x 0.45 m FTL 1.0 Atleast 15' berm Borrow pits in steps -0.45 11.20 10.75 PROPOSED X- SECTION OF EARTHEN BUND Surplussing Arrangement (Waste wier) U/s PLAN dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % lw[ks iRFkj ds psd Mse fuekZ.k ukyk iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r %------ No of LSCD Proposed 1 No. Length of Nall 750.00 M Level differnce in Nalla 7.00 M Assumptions : 1. Width of Nalla : 5.00 m 2. Depth of Nallah : 1.50 m 3. Flow over crest + free board : 0.60 m 4. Approx. Catchment Area : 30.0 Ha 5. Wier section may vary as per Catchment area and specific site conditions. nj jkf'k dz-l- fooj.k eki ek=k bZdkb l- y- pkS- m Je dqy Je dqy 1 uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) HW 1 5.00 2.10 0.30 3.15 SW 2 2.10 0.45 0.30 0.57 SW (Berm) 2 2.10 0.45 1.50 2.84 Pitching TW 2 2.00 0.30 0.30 0.36 6.92 m3 99.00 99.00 685.08 685.08 2 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& Pitching 2 2.00 1.80 0.23 1.66 1.66 m2 124.10 269.00 206.01 446.54 ;ksx 4802.05 12876.28 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 386.29 dqy ;ksx 4802.05 13262.57 ykxr Je en esa ------36.2% 4802.05 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------63.8% 8457.95 dqy ykxr 13260.00 Total LSCD Proposed 1 No Total LSCD Cost for DL1 13260.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 0.13 lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj lw[ks iRFkj ds psd Mse fuekZ.k dk;Z dk uke % (5m x 0.90) ;kstuk & IWMP ;kstuk & leUufor tyxzg.k- fodkl dk;ZØe SW Dry stone Pitching 0.75 1.35 SW Slope 0.60 0.75 0.30 0.90 1.20 0.30 Earth filling 1:1 slope 0.60 1.65 0.30 G.L. 2.00 HW Foundation 2.10 A Typical Cross-Section of LSCD 23cm Dry Stone Pitching on slope 23cm DS Pitching on of U/s Bank slope of U/sBank U/s 2.00 5.00 HW Step 3 0.75 SW Str. 0.75 Step 2 0.45 SW Step 1 0.45 Slope 1.35 G.L.. Step 0.45 0.45 0.45 PLAN 0.45 0.45 5.00 0.60 1.50 0.90 0.30 ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % Loose Stone Check Dam 1 iapk;r lfefr % ------fd'kux< xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------DL 3 1 No of LSCD Proposed No Length of Nall 1020.00 M Level differnce in Nalla 5.60 M Assumptions : 1. Width of Nalla : 3.00 m 2. Depth of Nallah : 0.90 m 3. Flow over crest + free board : 0.30 m 4. Approx. Catchment Area : 30.0 Ha 5. Wier section may vary as per Catchment area and specific site conditions. nj jkf'k dz-l- fooj.k eki ek=k bZdkb l- y- pkS- m Je dqy Je dqy 1 uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) HW 1 3.00 1.50 0.30 1.35 HWE 1 1.00 0.75 0.30 0.23 HWE 1 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.34 SW 2 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.68 SW (Berm) 2 1.50 0.75 0.90 2.03 Pitching TW 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 4.90 m3 99.00 99.00 485.10 485.10 2 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 HWE 1 1.00 0.68 0.600 0.41 HWE 1 1.50 0.68 0.600 0.61 S/s HW Step 1 1 3.00 1.20 0.30 1.08 HW Step 2 1 3.00 0.90 0.30 0.81 HW Step 3 1 3.00 0.60 0.30 0.54 SW strgt. 2 0.60 0.75 0.90 0.81 SW slope 2 0.90 0.75 0.60 0.81 7.37 m3 332.00 997.00 2446.84 7347.89 lw[ks iRFkjksa dh fifpax dk dk;Z 23 lseh iRFkj lsA 3 (Item No. 199 a) Pitching 2 1.50 1.20 0.23 0.83 0.83 m2 124.10 269.00 103.00 223.27 ;ksx 3034.94 8056.26 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 241.69 dqy ;ksx 8298.00 ykxr Je en esa ------36.5% 3030.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------63.5% 5270.00 dqy ykxr 8300.00 Total LSCD Proposed 1 No Total LSCD Cost for DL1 8300.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 0.08 lacs dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj lw[ks iRFkj ds psd Mse fuekZ.k dk;Z dk uke % (3 m x 0.90) ;kstuk & IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------ SW Dry stone Pitching 0.60 0.90 SW Slope 0.30 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.90 0.30 Earth filling 1:1 slope 0.30 1.20 0.30 G.L. 1.50 HW Foundation 1.50 A Typical Cross-Section of LSCD 23cm Dry Stone Pitching on slope of 23cm DS Pitching on U/s Bank slope of U/sBank U/s 1.50 3.00 0.75 m HW 0.60 SW Str. 0.60 Step 2 0.30 SW Step 1 0.30 Slope 0.90 G.L.. 0.30 0.75 0.75 PLAN 0.75 0.75 3.00 0.30 0.90 0.60 0.30 ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % Loose Stone Check Dam 1 iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------Gullies and Rills 1 No of LSCD Proposed No Assumptions : 1. Width of Nalla : 8.00 m 2. Depth of Nallah : 1.20 m 3. Flow over crest + free board : 0.30 m 4. Approx. Catchment Area : 30.0 Ha 5. Wier section may vary as per Catchment area and specific site conditions. nj jkf'k dz-l- fooj.k eki ek=k bZdkb l- y- pkS- m Je dqy Je dqy 1 uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) HW 1 8.00 1.50 0.30 3.60 HWE 1 1.00 0.75 0.30 0.23 HWE 1 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.34 SW 2 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.68 SW (Berm) 2 1.50 0.75 1.20 2.70 Pitching TW 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 7.82 m3 99.00 99.00 774.18 774.18 2 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 HWE 1 1.00 0.68 0.750 0.51 HWE 1 1.50 0.68 0.750 0.76 S/s HW Step 1 1 8.00 1.20 0.30 2.88 HW Step 2 1 8.00 1.05 0.30 2.52 HW Step 3 1 8.00 0.60 0.30 1.44 SW strgt. 2 0.60 0.75 1.20 1.08 SW slope 2 0.90 0.75 0.75 1.01 14.75 m3 332.00 997.00 4897.00 14705.75 lw[ks iRFkjksa dh fifpax dk dk;Z 23 lseh iRFkj lsA 3 (Item No. 199 a) Pitching 2 1.50 1.50 0.23 1.04 1.04 m2 124.10 269.00 129.06 279.76 ;ksx 5800.24 15759.69 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 472.79 dqy ;ksx 16232.00 ykxr Je en esa ------35.7% 5800.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------64.3% 10430.00 dqy ykxr 16230.00 Total LSCD Proposed 1 No Total LSCD Cost for DL1 16230.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 0.17 lacs dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj lw[ks iRFkj ds psd Mse fuekZ.k dk;Z dk uke % (8m X 0.9 ) IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------0 xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------Gullies and Rills SW Dry stone Pitching 0.60 0.90 SW Slope 0.30 0.60 0.30 0.90 1.05 0.30 Earth filling 1:1 slope 0.30 1.20 0.30 G.L. 1.50 HW Foundation 1.50 A Typical Cross-Section of LSCD 23cm Dry Stone Pitching on slope of 23cm DS Pitching on U/s Bank slope of U/sBank U/s 1.50 8.00 0.75 m HW 0.60 SW Str. 0.60 Step 2 0.45 SW Step 1 0.15 Slope 0.90 G.L.. 0.30 0.75 0.75 PLAN 0.75 0.75 8.00 0.30 1.20 0.90 0.30 ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;ark ia-l-flyksjk] ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % Loose Stone Check Dam iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------Gullies and Rills 1 No of LSCD Proposed No Assumptions : 1. Width of Nalla : 10.00 m 2. Depth of Nallah : 1.50 m 3. Flow over crest + free board : 0.45 m 4. Approx. Catchment Area : 30.0 Ha 5. Wier section may vary as per Catchment area and specific site conditions. nj jkf'k dz-l- fooj.k eki ek=k bZdkb l- y- pkS- m Je dqy Je dqy 1 uhao] [kkbZ] ijukyk esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item No. 2 b) HW 1 10.00 1.50 0.30 4.50 HWE 1 1.25 0.75 0.30 0.28 HWE 1 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.34 SW 2 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.68 SW (Berm) 2 1.50 0.75 1.35 3.04 Pitching TW 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 9.11 m3 99.00 99.00 901.89 901.89 2 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k& 2 1.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 HWE 1 1.25 0.68 0.825 0.70 HWE 1 1.50 0.68 0.825 0.84 S/s HW Step 1 1 10.00 1.20 0.30 3.60 HW Step 2 1 10.00 1.05 0.30 3.15 HW Step 3 1 10.00 0.60 0.30 1.80 SW strgt. 2 0.60 0.75 1.35 1.22 SW slope 2 0.90 0.75 0.83 1.11 17.87 m3 332.00 997.00 5932.84 17816.39 lw[ks iRFkjksa dh fifpax dk dk;Z 23 lseh iRFkj lsA 3 (Item No. 199 a) Pitching 2 1.50 1.65 0.23 1.14 1.14 m2 124.10 269.00 141.47 306.66 ;ksx 6976.20 19024.94 dfUVutsalh tksM+s 3 % 570.75 dqy ;ksx 19596.00 ykxr Je en esa ------35.6% 6980.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------64.4% 12620.00 dqy ykxr 19600.00 Total LSCD Proposed 1 No Total LSCD Cost for DL1 19600.00 All rates are as per Gramin Dar Anusuchie Feb 2013, PS Silora Dist Ajmer Say 0.20 lacs dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk] tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj lw[ks iRFkj ds psd Mse fuekZ.k dk;Z dk uke % IWMP iapk;r lfefr % ------0 xzke iapk;r %------xzke %------dk;Z dk LFkku %------Gullies and Rills SW Dry stone Pitching 0.60 0.90 SW Slope 0.30 0.60 0.30 1.05 1.05 0.30 Earth filling 1:1 slope 0.30 1.20 0.30 G.L. 1.50 HW Foundation 1.50 A Typical Cross-Section of LSCD 23cm Dry Stone Pitching on slope of 23cm DS Pitching on U/s Bank slope of U/sBank U/s 1.50 10.00 0.75 m HW 0.60 SW Str. 0.60 Step 2 0.45 SW Step 1 0.15 Slope 0.90 G.L.. 0.30 0.75 0.75 PLAN 0.75 0.75 10.00 0.30 1.35 1.05 0.30 ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&1½ iapk;r lfefr % xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Asumptions : Catchment Area 15.0 Hac Length of Basin (LB) 1.7625 m Nala Width (L) 3.00 m Foundation of Basin 0.6 m Nala Depth 1.20 m Length of SW 2.6625 Nalla Bed slope 1% Top Width of SW 0.6 m Length of WHS 3.00 m Height of SW at HWE 1.5 m Depth of Foundation 0.90 m Height of SW at WW junction 0.45 m Height of HW (H) 0.75 m Bottom Width of SW at HWE 0.6 m Top Width of HW 0.60 m Bottom Width of SW at WW 0.6 m Bottom Width of HW 1.2 m Length of Wing Wall 1 m Width of Conc. Bed (HW) 1.35 m Height of WW 0.30 m Length of HWE (Lt) 1.50 m TW of WW 0.45 m Length of HWE (Rt) 1.50 m BW of WW 0.45 m Height of HWE 1.25 m Foundation Depth of Wing Wall 0.60 m Top Width of HWE 0.60 m Width of TW 0.30 m BW of HWE (b) 0.60 m Height of TW 0.30 m Width of Conc. Bed (HWE) 0.90 m Foundation Depth of Toe Wall 0.60 m Flow over Crest 0.30 m Capacity of Structure 105.46875 Cum (62.5xLH2/S) Flow over crest+Free Board(d) 0.50 m nj jkf'k dz-la- fooj.k la- y- pkS- Åa- ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1- uhao esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feVVh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item no. 2b, 190c, 2c ) v HW 1 3.00 1.35 0.90 3.645 c HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.90 2.15 2.903 l HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.90 2.15 2.903 n SW 2 2.66 0.60 2.15 6.869 ; WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.60 0.540 j TW 1 3.00 0.30 0.60 0.540 y Apron 1 3.00 1.76 0.60 3.173 (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 2.15 -0.774 ?ku eh- 19.798 l[r feêh 1- 40% 9.899 ?ku eh- 99.00 99.00 979.99 979.99 eqjZe 2 40% 5.939 ?ku eh- 108.00 108.00 641.45 641.45 fo?kfVr pêku 3 20% 3.960 ?ku eh- 146.00 146.00 578.09 578.09 2- lhesUV daØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukHkh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 4 jsr % 8 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA Jfed fefJrA (Item No. 192) v ?ku eh- HW 1 3.00 1.35 0.25 1.013 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.90 0.25 0.338 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.90 0.25 0.338 n ?ku eh- SW 2 2.66 0.60 0.25 0.799 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.25 0.225 j ?ku eh- TW 1 3.00 0.30 0.25 0.225 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 3.00 1.76 0.25 1.322 ?ku eh- (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 0.25 -0.090 4.168 /ku eh- 353.00 2226.00 1423.00 9278.25 3 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA uhao esa (Item No. 191a) v ?ku eh- HW 1 3.00 1.20 0.65 2.340 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.60 0.65 0.585 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.60 0.65 0.585 n ?ku eh- SW 2 2.66 0.60 0.65 2.077 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.35 0.315 j ?ku eh- TW 1 3.00 0.30 0.35 0.315 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 3.00 1.76 0.15 0.793 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 0.00 0.65 0.000 7.010 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 2916.11 11671.44 4 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA lwijLV`Dpj esa (Item no. 191a ) v ?ku eh- HW 1 3.00 (1.2+0.6)/2 0.75 2.025 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.25 1.125 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.25 1.125 n ?ku eh- SW 2 0.60 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.25 0.900 (0.6+0.6+0.6+ ?ku eh- SW 2 2.06 0.6)/4(1.25+0.45)/2 2.104 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.30 0.270 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 (0)/2 1.25 0.000 7.549 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 3140.28 12568.67 5- lhesaV daadzhV 1 lhesaV % 2 ctjh % 4 iRFkj ,xzhxsV vuqikr es 12 fe-eh- ukHkh; eki dh ,xzhxsV ds lkFk MkyukA (Item no. 195) v ?ku eh- HW 1 3.00 0.60 0.10 0.180 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.60 0.05 0.045 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.60 0.05 0.045 n ?ku eh- SW 2 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.036 ?ku eh- SW 2 2.20 0.60 0.05 0.132 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.05 0.045 j ?ku eh- Apron 1 3.00 1.76 0.10 0.529 y ?ku eh- TW 1 3.00 0.30 0.10 0.090 1.102 ?ku eh- 352.00 3090.00 387.82 3404.41 6- lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%4 vuqikr es lhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 25 fe-eh-A (Item no. 73a) v HW 1 3.00 1.40 4.200 HW 1 3.00 0.20 0.600 c HWE(L) 1 1.50 1.90 2.850 HWE(L) 1 0.60 0.50 0.300 l HWE(R) 1 1.50 1.90 2.850 HWE(R) 1 0.60 0.50 0.300 n SW 2 0.00 0.50 0.000 SW 2 0.60 0.88 1.050 SW 2 2.06 0.850 3.506 SW 2 1.76 0.20 0.705 ; WW 2 1.00 0.30 0.600 j TW 1 3.00 0.20 0.600 17.561 oxZ eh- 81.90 146.00 1438.27 2563.94 7- iRFkj ds dke ij jsT+M ,.M dV Vhi 1%3 vuqikr es lhesaV ctjh elkys es e; rjkbZ dsA (Item No. 76, 76 i ) oxZ eh- HW D/s 1 3.00 1.00 3.00 94.70 105.30 284.10 315.90 8- P / F of weep hole for side wall L.S. 300.00 ;ksx 11789.10 42302.14 dfUVu tsalh tksM+ 3 % 1269.06 dqy ;ksx 43571.00 ykxr Je en esa ------27.1% 11790.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------72.9% 31780.00 dqy ;ksx 43570.00 Rate are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Say 0.44 lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&1½ iapk;r lfefr % flyksjk xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % iDdk psd Mse fuekZ.k eh- 1.50 3.00 1.50 HWE (R) HWE (L) 0.60 0.60 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.20 lkbM nhokj 2.66 1.76 ,izsu 0.30 Vks nhokj foax nhokj 1.00 PLAN 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj nkbZa 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj cakbZa 1.50 1.50 0.50 3.00 'kh"kZ nhokj 0.75 G.L. G.L. Vks nhokj 0-20eh 1.55 0.90 Appron CC1:4:8 -- 0.25m ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&2½ iapk;r lfefr % xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Asumptions : Catchment Area 5.0 Hac Length of Basin (LB) 2.2 m Nala Width (L) 5.00 m Foundation of Basin 0.6 m Nala Depth 1.50 m Length of SW 3.3 Nalla Bed slope 1% Top Width of SW 0.6 m Length of WHS 5.00 m Height of SW at HWE 1.5 m Depth of Foundation 0.90 m Height of SW at WW junction 0.45 m Height of HW (H) 1.00 m Bottom Width of SW at HWE 0.6 m Top Width of HW 0.60 m Bottom Width of SW at WW 0.6 m Bottom Width of HW 1.4 m Length of Wing Wall 1 m Width of Conc. Bed (HW) 1.55 m Height of WW 0.30 m Length of HWE (Lt) 1.50 m TW of WW 0.45 m Length of HWE (Rt) 1.50 m BW of WW 0.45 m Height of HWE 1.50 m Foundation Depth of Wing Wall 0.60 m Top Width of HWE 0.60 m Width of TW 0.30 m BW of HWE (b) 0.60 m Height of TW 0.30 m Width of Conc. Bed (HWE) 0.90 m Foundation Depth of Toe Wall 0.60 m Flow over Crest 0.30 m Capacity of Structure 312.5 Cum (62.5xLH2/S) Flow over crest+Free Board(d) 0.50 m nj jkf'k dz-la- fooj.k la- y- pkS- Åa- ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1- uhao esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feVVh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item no. 2b, 190c, 2c ) v HW 1 5.00 1.55 0.90 6.975 c HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.90 2.40 3.240 l HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.90 2.40 3.240 n SW 2 3.30 0.60 2.40 9.504 ; WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.60 0.540 j TW 1 5.00 0.30 0.60 0.900 y Apron 1 5.00 2.20 0.60 6.600 (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 2.40 -0.864 ?ku eh- 30.135 l[r feêh 1- 40% 15.068 ?ku eh- 99.00 99.00 1491.68 1491.68 eqjZe 2 40% 9.041 ?ku eh- 108.00 108.00 976.37 976.37 fo?kfVr pêku 3 20% 6.027 ?ku eh- 146.00 146.00 879.94 879.94 2- lhesUV daØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukHkh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 4 jsr % 8 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA Jfed fefJrA (Item No. 192) v ?ku eh- HW 1 5.00 1.55 0.25 1.938 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.90 0.25 0.338 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.90 0.25 0.338 n ?ku eh- SW 2 3.30 0.60 0.25 0.990 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.25 0.225 j ?ku eh- TW 1 5.00 0.30 0.25 0.375 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 5.00 2.20 0.25 2.750 ?ku eh- (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 0.25 -0.090 6.863 /ku eh- 353.00 2226.00 1423.00 15275.93 3 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA uhao esa (Item No. 191a) v ?ku eh- HW 1 5.00 1.40 0.65 4.550 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.60 0.65 0.585 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.60 0.65 0.585 n ?ku eh- SW 2 3.30 0.60 0.65 2.574 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.35 0.315 j ?ku eh- TW 1 5.00 0.30 0.35 0.525 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 5.00 2.20 0.15 1.650 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 0.00 0.65 0.000 10.784 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 4486.14 17955.36 4 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA lwijLV`Dpj esa (Item no. 191a & 28) v ?ku eh- HW 1 5.00 (1.4+0.6)/2 1.00 5.000 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.50 1.350 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.50 1.350 n ?ku eh- SW 2 0.80 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.50 1.440 (0.6+0.6+0.6+ ?ku eh- SW 2 2.50 0.6)/4 (1.5+0.45)/2 2.925 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.30 0.270 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 (0)/2 1.50 0.000 12.335 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 5131.36 20537.78 5- lhesaV daadzhV 1 lhesaV % 2 ctjh % 4 iRFkj ,xzhxsV vuqikr es 12 fe-eh- ukHkh; eki dh ,xzhxsV ds lkFk MkyukA (Item no. 195) v ?ku eh- HW 1 5.00 0.60 0.10 0.300 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 1.50 0.60 0.05 0.045 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 1.50 0.60 0.05 0.045 n ?ku eh- SW 2 0.80 0.60 0.05 0.048 ?ku eh- SW 2 2.70 0.60 0.05 0.162 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.00 0.45 0.05 0.045 j ?ku eh- Apron 1 5.00 2.20 0.10 1.100 y ?ku eh- TW 1 5.00 0.30 0.10 0.150 1.895 ?ku eh- 352.00 3090.00 667.04 5855.55 6- lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%4 vuqikr es lhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 25 fe-eh-A (Item no. 73a) v HW 1 5.00 1.65 8.250 HW 1 5.00 0.20 1.000 c HWE(L) 1 1.50 2.15 3.225 HWE(L) 1 0.60 0.50 0.300 l HWE(R) 1 1.50 2.15 3.225 HWE(R) 1 0.60 0.50 0.300 n SW 2 0.00 0.50 0.000 SW 2 0.80 1.00 1.600 SW 2 2.50 0.975 4.875 SW 2 2.20 0.20 0.880 ; WW 2 1.00 0.30 0.600 j TW 1 5.00 0.20 1.000 25.255 oxZ eh- 81.90 146.00 2068.38 3687.23 7- iRFkj ds dke ij jsT+M ,.M dV Vhi 1%3 vuqikr es lhesaV ctjh elkys es e; rjkbZ dsA (Item No. 76, 76 i ) oxZ eh- HW D/s 1 5.00 1.30 6.50 94.70 105.30 615.55 684.45 8- P / F of weep hole for side wall L.S. 300.00 ;ksx 17739.48 67644.29 dfUVu tsalh tksM+ 3 % 2029.33 dqy ;ksx 69674.00 ykxr Je en esa ------25.5% 17740.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------74.5% 51930.00 dqy ;ksx 69670.00 Rate are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Say 0.70 Lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&1½ iapk;r lfefr % flyksjk xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % iDdk psd Mse fuekZ.k eh- 1.50 5.00 1.50 HWE (R) HWE (L) 0.60 0.60 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.40 lkbM nhokj 3.30 2.20 ,izsu 0.30 Vks nhokj foax nhokj 1.00 PLAN 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj nkbZa 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj cakbZa 1.50 1.50 0.50 5.00 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.00 G.L. G.L. Vks nhokj 0-20eh 1.55 0.90 Appron CC1:4:8 -- 0.25m ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&3½ iapk;r lfefr % xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % Asumptions : Catchment Area 50.0 Hac Length of Basin (LB) 2.7875 m Nala Width (L) 7.75 m Foundation of Basin 0.6 m Nala Depth 2.00 m Length of SW 4.2875 Nalla Bed slope 1% Top Width of SW 0.6 m Length of WHS 7.75 m Height of SW at HWE 1.9 m Depth of Foundation 1.20 m Height of SW at WW junction 0.75 m Height of HW (H) 1.25 m Bottom Width of SW at HWE 0.6 m Top Width of HW 0.80 m Bottom Width of SW at WW 0.6 m Bottom Width of HW 1.8 m Length of Wing Wall 1.5 m Width of Conc. Bed (HW) 1.95 m Height of WW 0.75 m Length of HWE (Lt) 3.50 m TW of WW 0.60 m Length of HWE (Rt) 3.50 m BW of WW 0.90 m Height of HWE 1.95 m Foundation Depth of Wing Wall 0.60 m Top Width of HWE 0.60 m Width of TW 0.30 m BW of HWE (b) 0.60 m Height of TW 0.25 m Width of Conc. Bed (HWE) 0.90 m Foundation Depth of Toe Wall 0.60 m Flow over Crest 0.50 m Capacity of Structure 756.83594 Cum (62.5xLH2/S) Flow over crest+Free Board(d) 0.70 m nj jkf'k dz-la- fooj.k la- y- pkS- Åa- ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1- uhao esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feVVh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item no. 2b, 190c, 2c ) v HW 1 7.75 1.95 1.20 18.135 c HWE(L) 1 3.50 0.90 3.15 9.923 l HWE(R) 1 3.50 0.90 3.15 9.923 n SW 2 4.29 0.60 3.15 16.207 ; WW 2 1.50 0.90 0.60 1.620 j TW 1 7.75 0.30 0.60 1.395 y Apron 1 7.75 2.79 0.60 12.962 (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 3.15 -1.134 ?ku eh- 69.030 l[r feêh 1- 40% 34.515 ?ku eh- 99.00 99.00 3416.97 3416.97 eqjZe 2 40% 20.709 ?ku eh- 108.00 108.00 2236.56 2236.56 fo?kfVr pêku 3 20% 13.806 ?ku eh- 146.00 146.00 2015.67 2015.67 2- lhesUV daØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukHkh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 4 jsr % 8 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA Jfed fefJrA (Item No. 192) v ?ku eh- HW 1 7.75 1.95 0.25 3.778 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 3.50 0.90 0.25 0.788 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 3.50 0.90 0.25 0.788 n ?ku eh- SW 2 4.29 0.60 0.25 1.286 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.50 0.90 0.25 0.675 j ?ku eh- TW 1 7.75 0.30 0.25 0.581 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 7.75 2.79 0.25 5.401 ?ku eh- (-) overlapping -2 0.60 0.30 0.25 -0.090 13.206 /ku eh- 353.00 2226.00 1423.00 29397.46 3 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA uhao esa (Item No. 191a) v ?ku eh- HW 1 7.75 1.80 0.95 13.253 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 3.50 0.60 0.95 1.995 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 3.50 0.60 0.95 1.995 n ?ku eh- SW 2 4.29 0.60 0.95 4.888 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.50 0.90 0.35 0.945 j ?ku eh- TW 1 7.75 0.30 0.35 0.814 y ?ku eh- Apron 1 7.75 2.79 0.15 3.240 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 0.00 0.95 0.000 27.129 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 11285.86 45170.57 4 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA lwijLV`Dpj esa (Item no. 191a & 28) v ?ku eh- HW 1 7.75 (1.8+0.8)/2 1.25 12.594 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 3.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.95 4.095 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 3.50 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.95 4.095 n ?ku eh- SW 2 1.20 (0.6+0.6)/2 1.95 2.808 (0.6+0.6+0.6+ ?ku eh- SW 2 3.09 0.6)/4(1.95+0.75)/2 5.002 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.50 0.75 0.75 1.688 ?ku eh- Overlapping -2 0.60 (0)/2 1.95 0.000 30.281 ?ku eh- 416.00 1665.00 12596.90 50417.87 5- lhesaV daadzhV 1 lhesaV % 2 ctjh % 4 iRFkj ,xzhxsV vuqikr es 12 fe-eh- ukHkh; eki dh ,xzhxsV ds lkFk MkyukA (Item no. 195) v ?ku eh- HW 1 7.75 0.80 0.10 0.620 c ?ku eh- HWE(L) 1 3.50 0.60 0.05 0.105 l ?ku eh- HWE(R) 1 3.50 0.60 0.05 0.105 n ?ku eh- SW 2 1.20 0.60 0.05 0.072 ?ku eh- SW 2 3.30 0.60 0.05 0.198 ; ?ku eh- WW 2 1.50 0.60 0.05 0.090 j ?ku eh- Apron 1 7.75 2.79 0.10 2.160 y ?ku eh- TW 1 7.75 0.30 0.10 0.233 3.583 ?ku eh- 352.00 3090.00 1261.15 11070.89 6- lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%4 vuqikr es lhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 25 fe-eh-A (Item no. 73a) v HW 1 7.75 2.20 17.050 HW 1 7.75 0.20 1.550 c HWE(L) 1 3.50 2.90 10.150 HWE(L) 1 0.60 0.70 0.420 l HWE(R) 1 3.50 2.90 10.150 HWE(R) 1 0.60 0.70 0.420 n SW 2 0.20 0.70 0.280 SW 2 1.00 1.33 2.650 SW 2 3.09 1.350 8.336 SW 2 2.79 0.20 1.115 ; WW 2 1.50 0.75 2.250 j TW 1 7.75 0.20 1.550 55.921 oxZ eh- 81.90 146.00 4579.95 8164.50 7- iRFkj ds dke ij jsT+M ,.M dV Vhi 1%3 vuqikr es lhesaV ctjh elkys es e; rjkbZ dsA (Item No. 76, 76 i ) oxZ eh- HW D/s 1 7.75 1.60 12.40 94.70 105.30 1174.28 1305.72 8- P / F of weep hole for side wall L.S. 300.00 ;ksx 39990.33 153496.20 dfUVu tsalh tksM+ 3 % 4604.89 dqy ;ksx 158101.00 ykxr Je en esa ------25.3% 39990.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------74.7% 118110.00 dqy ;ksx 158100.00 Rate are as per Feb 2013 BSR, PS Silora , Dist Ajmer Say 1.58 Lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux< ]ftyk & vtesj dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&1½ iapk;r lfefr % flyksjk xzke iapk;r % xzke % dk;Z dk LFkku % iDdk psd Mse fuekZ.k eh- 3.50 7.75 3.50 HWE (R) HWE (L) 0.60 0.80 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.80 lkbM nhokj 4.29 2.79 ,izsu 0.30 Vks nhokj foax nhokj 1.50 PLAN 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj nkbZa 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj cakbZa 3.50 3.50 0.70 7.75 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.25 G.L. G.L. Vks nhokj 0-20eh 1.55 1.20 Appron CC1:4:8 -- 0.25m ELEVATION dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< iapk;r lfefr fd'kux< dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux<+ ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ;kstuk &tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------Asumptions : Catchment Area 110 Hac Flow over Crest 0.60 m Nala Width (L) 15.00 m Flow over crest+Free Board(d) 1.00 m Nala Depth 1.90 m Length of Basin (LB) 1.63 m Nalla Bed slope 1% Foundation of Basin 0.80 m Length of SW 3.73 Length of WHS 15.00 m Top Width of SW 0.60 m Depth of Foundation 1.10 m Height of SW at HWE 1.50 m Height of HW (H) 1.50 m Height of SW at WW junction 0.90 m Top Width of HW 0.80 m Bottom Width of SW at HWE 1.20 m Bottom Width of HW 2.25 m Bottom Width of SW at WW 1.00 m Width of Conc. Bed (HW) 2.55 m Length of Wing Wall 2.30 m Length of HWE (Lt) 4.00 m Height of WW 0.90 m Length of HWE (Rt) 4.00 m TW of WW 0.60 m Height of HWE 2.80 m BW of WW 1.00 m Top Width of HWE 0.60 m Foundation Depth of Wing Wall 0.90 m BW of HWE 1.70 m Width of TW 0.45 m Width of Conc. Bed (HWE) 2.00 m Height of TW 0.30 m Foundation Depth of Toe Wall 0.80 m Capacity of Structure 2109.38 Cum (62.5xLH2/S) nj jkf'k dz-la- fooj.k la- y- pkS- Åa- ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1- uhao esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feVVh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks ckgj fudkyuk] uhao Hkjus ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item no. 2b, 190c, 2c ) v HW 1 15.00 2.55 1.10 42.075 c HWE(L) 1 4.00 2.00 3.90 31.200 l HWE(R) 1 4.00 2.00 3.90 31.200 n SW 2 3.73 1.10 3.90 31.961 ; WW 2 2.30 1.00 0.90 4.140 j TW 1 15.00 0.45 0.80 5.400 y Apron 1 15.00 1.63 0.80 19.500 (-) overlapping -2 1.20 1.40 3.90 -13.104 /ku eh- 152.372 l[r feêh 1- 40% 76.186 /ku eh- 99.00 99.00 7542.39 7542.39 ejZe 2 40% 45.711 /ku eh- 108.00 108.00 4936.84 4936.84 fo?kfVr pêku 2- 20% 30.474 /ku eh- 146.00 146.00 4449.25 4449.25 2- lhesUV daØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukHkh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 4 jsr % 8 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA Jfed fefJrA (Item No. 192) v /ku eh- HW 1 15.00 2.55 0.30 11.475 c /ku eh- HWE(L) 1 4.00 2.00 0.30 2.400 l /ku eh- HWE(R) 1 4.00 2.00 0.30 2.400 n /ku eh- SW 2 3.73 1.10 0.30 2.459 ; /ku eh- WW 2 2.30 1.00 0.30 1.380 j /ku eh- TW 1 15.00 0.45 0.30 2.025 y /ku eh- Apron 1 15.00 1.63 0.30 7.313 /ku eh- (-) overlapping -2 1.20 1.40 0.30 -1.008 /ku eh- 28.443 353.00 1894.00 10040.38 53871.04 3 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA uhao esa (Item No. 191a) v /ku eh- HW 1 15.00 2.25 0.80 27.000 c /ku eh- HWE(L) 1 4.00 1.70 0.80 5.440 l /ku eh- HWE(R) 1 4.00 1.70 0.80 5.440 n /ku eh- SW 2 3.73 1.10 0.80 6.556 ; /ku eh- WW 2 2.30 1.00 0.60 2.760 j /ku eh- TW 1 15.00 0.45 0.50 3.375 y /ku eh- Apron 1 15.00 1.63 0.30 7.313 /ku eh- Overlapping -2 1.20 1.10 0.80 -2.112 /ku eh- 55.772 416.00 1665.00 23200.94 92859.55 4 ,uhdV gsrq iRFkj dh fpukbZ 1%6 vuqikr lhesaV&ctjh elkys esaA lwijLV`Dpj esa (Item no. 191a & 28) v /ku eh- HW 1 15.00 (2.25+0.8)/2 1.50 34.313 c /ku eh- HWE(L) 1 4.00 (1.7+0.6)/2 2.80 12.880 l /ku eh- HWE(R) 1 4.00 (1.7+0.6)/2 2.80 12.880 n /ku eh- SW 2 1.65 (1.2+0.6)/2 2.80 8.316 (1.2+0.6+0.6+ /ku eh- SW 2 2.08 1)/4 (2.8+0.9)/2 6.526 ; /ku eh- WW 2 2.30 0.80 0.90 3.312 /ku eh- Overlapping -2 1.20 (1.1)/2 2.80 -3.696 /ku eh- 74.530 416.00 1665.00 31004.64 124093.07 5- lhesaV daadzhV 1 lhesaV % 2 ctjh % 4 iRFkj ,xzhxsV vuqikr es 12 fe-eh- ukHkh; eki dh ,xzhxsV ds lkFk MkyukA (Item no. 195) v /ku eh- HW 1 15.00 0.80 0.10 1.200 c /ku eh- HWE(L) 1 4.00 0.60 0.05 0.120 l /ku eh- HWE(R) 1 4.00 0.60 0.05 0.120 n /ku eh- SW 2 1.65 0.60 0.05 0.099 /ku eh- SW 2 2.70 0.60 0.05 0.162 ; /ku eh- WW 2 2.30 0.60 0.05 0.138 j /ku eh- Apron 1 15.00 1.63 0.10 2.438 y /ku eh- TW 1 15.00 0.45 0.10 0.675 /ku eh- 4.952 352.00 3090.00 1742.93 15300.14 6- lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%4 vuqikr es lhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 25 fe-eh-A (Item no. 73a) v HW 1 15.00 2.30 34.500 HW 1 15.00 0.20 3.000 c HWE(L) 1 4.00 3.60 14.400 HWE(L) 1 0.60 1.00 0.600 l HWE(R) 1 4.00 3.60 14.400 HWE(R) 1 0.60 1.00 0.600 n SW 2 0.20 1.00 0.400 SW 2 1.45 1.90 5.510 SW 2 2.08 1.850 7.678 SW 2 1.63 0.20 0.650 ; WW 2 2.30 0.90 4.140 j TW 1 15.00 0.20 3.000 oxZ eh- 88.878 81.90 146.00 7279.07 12976.12 7- iRFkj ds dke ij jsT+M ,.M dV Vhi 1%3 vuqikr es lhesaV ctjh elkys es e; rjkbZ dsA (Item No. 76, 76 i ) oxZ eh- HW D/s 1 15.00 2.10 31.50 94.70 105.30 2983.05 3316.95 8- P / F of weep hole for side wall L.S. 300.00 ;ksx 93179.48 319645.34 tksM+ 3 dfUVu tsalh % 9589.36 dqy ;ksx 93179 329235 ykxr Je en esa ------28.3% 93180 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------71.7% 236060 dqy ;ksx 329240 Rate are as per Feb 2013 BSR PS Silora , Dist. Ajmer Say 3.30 Lacs dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk dk;kZy; lgk;d vfHk;Urk tyxzg.k ia-l fd'kux<+ ]ftyk & vtesj -:foLr`r rdehuk:- dk;Z dk uke % ekbuj iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ ¼Vkbi&1½ ;kstuk &tyxzg.k fodkl iapk;r lfefr % ------xzke iapk;r % ------xzke % ------dk;Z dk LFkku % ------ iDdk psd Mse fuekZ.k eh- 3.00 15.00 4.00 HWExt(R) HWExt(L) 0.60 0.80 'kh"kZ nhokj 2.25 3.73 lkbM nhokj 1.63 ,izsu 1.63 Vks nhokj foax nhokj 2.30 Iyku 'kh"kZ nhokj nkbZa 'kh"kZ nhokj cakbZa 0.90 'kh"kZ nhokj 1.50 Vks nhokj G.L. 0.30 G.L. 1.1 1.55 CC1:4:8, 0.25m dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark iapk;r lfefr flyksjk iapk;r lfefr flyksjk vko';d lkexzh pkVZ 0 iapk;r %& iapk;r lfefr % ------ia- l- %& 0 lhesaV jsr iRFkj fxêh /ku eh- esa dzlj 20 dz- la- fooj.k ek=k FkSys /ku eh- /ku eh- feeh- 40 fe-eh- 1 lhesaV fxêh ¼1%4%8½ 28.44 91.02 12.80 25.60 2 lw[ks iRFkjksa dk [kjatk 3 lhesaV elkyk 1%6 esa iRFkj dh pqukbZ 130.30 182.42 39.09 130.30 4 lhesaV fxêh ¼1%2%4½ 4.95 28.92 2.03 4.06 5 25 fe- fe- eksVk lhesaV IykLVj 1%4 88.88 19.91 2.84 ;ksx 322.00 56.76 130.30 4.06 25.60 dk;Z dk uke % iDdk psd Mse fuek.kZ fofHkUu Hkkxksa dk Øksl lsD'ku 0.80 0.60 1.00 CC (1:2:4) 10 cm thick 1.50 0.10 m thick CC (1:2:4) G.l. 0.50 2.25 0.80 0.30 2.55 lhsesaV dadzhV 1%4%8 'kh"kZ nhokj],izsu o Vks nhokj dh vkM+h dkV 0.60 0.60 2.60 1.50 3.90 2.80 1.70 1.70 0.30 2.00 lhsesaV dadzhV 1%4%8 2.00 ckabZ fnokj nkabZ fnokj 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj dh vkM+h dkV 0.6 1.50 2.60 0.6 0.90 1.80 0.30 1.20 0.30 1.20 lhsesaV dadzhV 1%4%8 lhsesaV dadzhV 1%4%8 'kh"kZ nhokj foLrkj ds tksM+ ij lkbM nhokj dh vkM+h dkV foax nhokj ds tksM+ ij lkbM nhokj dh vkM+h dkV dfu"B vfHk;ark lgk;d vfHk;ark uke------uke------iapk;r lfefr------iapk;r lfefr------All Dimension in Meter Model Estimate of Kitchen Gardening Head Tentative cost Vegetable seeds 1500 Bucket drip kits 2000 Fertilizer , pesticides and weeding 500 OthersTotal 10005000 Model Estimate for Drip Irrigation Head Tentative cost ( in Rs. ) PVC Mains & Sub-Mains Pipe 13000 Lateral Pipes HDPE 15000 Filter, Ventury & Pumps 20000 Drippers 5000 FittingsTotal and Others 200055000 Rs 24000 will be given from the project fund. Rest will be borne by the beneficiary. Model Estimate for Sprinkler Irrigation Head Tentative cost ( in Rs. ) PVC Mains & Sub-Mains Pipe 10000 Flexible HDPE Pipes 15000 Sprinkler Sets 15000 OtherTotal Fittings 500045000 Rs 24000 will be given from the project fund. Rest will be borne by the beneficiary. Model Estimate of Fodder Bank S.NO Particular Amount Remark 1 Corpus fund for purchase of Fodder from the 25,000 From project village or market 2 Storage house on rent 36000 50 % by village 3 Value addition in fodder for nutritious 8000 From project fodder 4 Salary for one local person to looking after 36000 50 % by village fodder bank and record keeping 5 Balance machine etc Total Cost -1, 11,0006000/- Project Project cost =75,000/- Community contribution -36,000/- Note- This is the one time cost for one year, community would make the arrangement of salary and rent of fodder godown after first year. Corpus fund of 50,000/- would help the community to multiple it and purchase of fodder in future as per their requirement. Producer Company will guide and assist the fodder bank Model Estimate of Seed Bank S.NO Particular Amount Remark 1 Demonstration area of seed bank unit 25000 2 Storage house for seed bank 36000 50 % from project 3 Certification process of seed 30000 4 Recordkeeping and appoint one local person 36000 50 % from project for looking after the seed bank 5 Miscellaneous expenses 10000 Total Cost - 1, 36,000/- Project cost =1,00,000/- Community contribution =36,000/- Note- This is one time cost for one year. Seed for seed bank and all other practices for seed certification have already planned. Seed bank purchase seed from the beneficiaries of those activity. Producer Company would guide and assist the seed bank. Breed Improvement Project S.NO Particular Amount Remark 1 Purchase of high breed quality of cow 75,000 Including or buffalo of murrah breed suitable to transportation cost project area from the state or adjoing state Estimate of Grain Bank Head Tentative cost Cost of Grain 20,000 Purchase of weight and balance 3000 Grant for Storage arrangement 10,000 Arrangement for safe storage 5000 Miscellaneous expenses 12,000 Total cost =50,000/- Model Estimate Vermi Compost nj dk;Z dh ykxr dz-la- fooj.k la- y- pkS- Åa- ek=k bdkbZ Je dqy Je dqy 1- uhao esa 1-5 xgjkbZ rd feVVh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk] ikuh Mkyuk] cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnh feêh dks 6ckgj fudkyuk]2 uhao2 Hkjus2.5 ds ckn [kkyh60.000 LFkkuksa/ku dksQhV iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA (Item no. 2b, 190c, 2c ) 60.000 /ku QhV 1.699 /ku eh- 99.00 99.00 168.18 168.18 2- lhesUV daØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukHkh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV jsr 0.00 0.00 elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 4 jsr % 8 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA v JfedHW fefJrA6 (Item 2.00No. 192)2.00 2.50 60.000 /ku QhV 0.00 0.00 1.699 /ku eh- 353.00 2226.00 599.68 3781.53 3 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa izFke Js.kh bZaVksa dh fpukbZ lhesaV&ctjh 1%6 ;k 1%8 elkys esa] e; cxy dh f>jh cUn djus rFkk rjkbZ lesrA 0.00 0.00 4 16.50 0.75 2.00 99.000 /ku QhV 0.00 0.00 4 3.00 0.75 2.00 18.000 /ku QhV 0.00 0.00 117.000 /ku QhV 0.00 0.00 3.313 /ku eh- 411.00 2956.00 1361.51 9792.24 6- lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%6 vuqikr es lhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 20 fe-eh-A (Item no. 73a) 0.00 0.00 6 5.00 7.00 210.000 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 2 16.25 3.00 97.500 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 2 10.00 3.00 60.000 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 367.500 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 10.405 oxZ eh- 49.50 98.00 515.06 1019.71 7- fxzy@xsV vkfn es yksgs dk dk;Z ftlesa likV] dksfu;k] Vh rFkk ukyhnkj ¼psuy½] dks dkVuk] p<+kuk rFkk yxkuk vkfnA 0.00 0.00 60.000 fdxkz 10.40 70.90 624.00 4254.00 8 6 fe-eh- eksVkbZ es ukyhnkj ,LosLVl lhesaV dh pnjksa dks bLikr ds ts ;k ,y gqd rFkk uV oksYV ls yxkuk o vkiwfÙkZ djukA dSph rFkk ijfyu dh Hkqxrku vyx ls gksxkA 0.00 0.00 10 10.00 3.00 300.000 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 300.000 oxZQhV 0.00 0.00 27.871 oxZ eh- 24.00 433.00 668.90 12068.12 8 Cow dung 0.00 10.000 Vu 800.00 8000.00 9 Worms @ 10 kg per trench 0.00 30.000 fdxkz 100.00 3000.00 10 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 0.00 0.00 3.00 Bed 420.00 1260.00 11 Training for Vermi compost Preaperation ;ksx 3937.32 43343.77 ;ksx 3937.32 43343.77 ykxr Je en esa ------9.1% 3937.00 ykxr lkexzh en esa ------90.9% 39406.00 dqy ;ksx 43343.00 % Mater Contributi Labut ial Total on Expenditure by 3937.0 15406 19343 Benificries 0 .00 .00 44.63 Expenditure by 24000 24000 Project 0.00 .00 .00 55.37 Total 3937.0 39406 43343 Expenditure 0 .00 .00 Model Estimate of Tool Kit Household Production System( for Marginal farmer and Land less labour ) Service sector- Tool Kit Specification Trade wise Detail of tools requirement in one set 1. One set of carpentry tools COST RS. 4000/ Kit S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Hand saw Size 15” 1 No 2 Hand saw Size 12” 1 No 3 Screw driver Size 8”x25mm 1 No 4 Combination pliers Size 8”Make – Taparia 1 No 5 Charsi with handle Size 25 mm 1 No 6 Charsi with handle Size 18 mm 1 No 7 Charsi with handle Size 10 mm 1 No 8 Wooden Randda Big- Made of Sagwan 1 No 9 Wooden Randda Small – Made of Sagwan 1 No 10 File half round Make JK 1 No 11 File regular Make JK 1 No 12 Tee Bar carpenter Size 4’x2” 1 No frame (shikanja) for wooden frame 13 Stone silly Size 6”- ISI Mark 1 No 14 Basola with handle Weight 800 gram 1 No 15 Ball peen harmmer Weight 300 gram Make Ambica 1 No 16 Cross peen hammer Weight 500 gram – Make Ambica 1 No 17 Measurement tape Size 10 feet- Make Freeman 1 No 18 Pincer Size 200 mm- 1 No 19 Girmit Size ½ “ 1 No 20 Tri Square Size 8” 1 No 21 Hand Operated drill Size ¼ “ 1 No 22 Steel box for Tools Size( 22”x11”) – G.I. sheet 1 No 2. One set of Mason tools COST RS. 10000/ Kit S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Karni Size – Big- 1 No 2 Karni Size – small 1 No 3 Mashtar wooden Size 36” Made of Sagwan 1 No 4 Mashtar wooden Size 24 “ Made of Sagwan 1 No 5 Mashtar wooden Size 15” Made of Sagwan 1 No 6 Gurmala 1 No 7 Soot 1 No 8 Sabbal Heavy iron 1 No 9 L shape measurement (Gunia) 1 No 10 Level pipe(25 foot) 5 mm 1 No 11 Chiesal Size 6” , 8” Make – Taparia 1 No 12 Ball pine hammer Weight 500 gm Make – Ambica 1 No 13 Cross pine hammer Weight 300 gm Make – Ambica 1 No 14 Aluminium rib Size 60” x 4”x 1.5” 1 No 15 Measurement tape Size 10 feet Make – Freemans 1 No 16 Canvas bag for above tools Made of Heavy canvas 1 No 3 . One set of Pottery Tools COST RS. 10000/ Kit S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Clay lump beating hammer MS pat. Size – D 100 – 120 mm x T5-6mm. with iron pipe handle 1 2 Wooden hammer(Thapa) Sheesam Wood. Size – D6-7”x T1.25”. handle- L6” 1 3 Tasla MS Sheet. Size- D15”. SWG-20 1 4 Spade (Phawda) MS sheet. Size L 10 “x w10”. SWGT-20. fitted with Wooden 1 Handle 5 Kamdai Wooden Size- 2”x 1-1.25” approx. Arc. Shap 6 Pindi Cement Various Sizes 3 7 Decoration tools MS (Banki, Sua. Piyali. Patti) 8 8 Decoration Wheel Size- H 16” x D 12-15”. Tripod Structure. Fitted with double Ball 1 Bearing. Iron sheet 5 mm 9 Manual Potter Wheel Outer Dia- inner plate size – D-300mm x T-20mm. T-WT- 17 kg 1 minimum (Casted iron body). Tripod Casted Iron Structure with Ball bearing. 2 nos. of outer rings made of T or steal of 12 mm Dia. Cross Wooden Support Structure. 10 Electric Potter wheel Structure dimension (25”x16”x16”) iron angle (iron angle 1 structure 35-5) casted iron wheel dia 23”. Ball bearing -2 (6206) sealed. Shaft dia 2”. V- belt pully, WT 23-25 kg. 4. One set of Footwear(Mojari) Tools COST RS. 10000/ Kit S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Hummer Ball Pane Drop forged steel. Induction hardened. Seasoned wood handle. WT- 300 gms with 2 Wooden Block Sizewooden- L 18”x handle. W4”x Nylon T 4” hammer (L 240 mm. 1 head size L80x D300mm) 3 Pincer Size – 8” 1 4 Scissors Size- 9”. Steel Body. Brass Handle 1 5 Bodam / Shoe anvil Graded CI with 3 phases. WT – 4 kg . approx. 1 6 Cutting Blade Set Steel with Wooden Handle. Size- L 150x W30X T6mm set (Ramp) 7 Stitching Awl Steel with Sheesham Wood Handle 1 8 Sharpening Stone Size- 150x50x25mm. 109 no. 1 9 Shoe measuring Tape Size—2’ fibre/ good quality plastic material 1 10 Lock Punch Set Steel 1 11 Eye let setting tool Steel 1 12 Round whole punch Steel, Size – L 100 Range- 1 to 10 1 set(10 set pcs.) 13 Design punch Set En-9 steel. Size – L100 1 set(3 pcs.) 14 Zig zag Steel Scissors Steel, Size- 81/2”. Grooves on cutting edge. 1 15 Pattern Cutting Knife Steel, Size – 6” 1 16 PP Block Size- L 6” x W 6” x T 20mm 1 17 Steel Scale Size-12” and 24” 1 18 Leather Scraping Brush Size- 8” with wooden Handle 1 19 Adhesive Brush Size- 10 mm. 12 mm. 25 mm 1 20 Spring Divider Steel- Size 9” 1 21 Sant Steel- H 6” WT – 1 kg. 1 22 Sizzeore Passing Steel- Size 8” 1 23 Thread Cutter Steel with plaste handle. Size- L 100 mm 1 24 Number sety Steel Set of 10 25 Capsol Punch Size (8-10-12-16) Set 26 Brush Size 10 mm. 12mm.25mm 1 Machine Tools 1 27 HD Flat Bad Swing 31 K. Branded Company 1 Machine 5. One set of Blacksmith Tools COST RS. 10000/ Kit S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Big Hammer Ghon – 5 kg 1 2 Hammer Ghon – 1 kg 1 3 Hammer Ghon – ½ kg 1 4 Anvil- chouka Ghon – 10 kg 1 5 Chisel- 3 Nos Ghon – 1 kg,500 kg. 1 750gm 6 Meaurement tape 3 MTR 1 7 Tringle 6” 1 8 Plie Taparia 8” 1 9 Scra drive 10” Tapana 1 10 Tin 10” 1 11 Hand operated electric hand drill - 1 12 Sansasi- flat and round - 1 13 Table Vice - 1 14 Haksa Frame Poland type - 1 6 One set of Cycle Mechanic Tools COST RS. S.No. Name of tools Specification Quantity 1 Hammer 500gm 160 2 Hammer 1 kg 250 3 1 8” Taparia 300 4 Screw driver Taparia 6”-8”-12” 250 5 Pincer- 6” 6” 100 6 Nose plier-6” 6” 100 7 Alignment equipment cycle wheel 2000 8 Anivil – Chowka 5 kg 1000 9 Screw wrench 10” 250 10 Hexa Frame polaud type 250 11 Spanner Set fix type 8 pcs 8 pcs 500 12 Electric hand drill machine 2500 13 Hand Skipper 10” 200 14 Solution 100 15 Water Pump Plier 200 16 Punch 6” 50 17 Hand Scissors 8” 200 18 Oil cane 250 gm 100 6 One set of Tailoring Tools Cost – Rs 10000 from project fund Sr. No. Details No. Price Rs. Fixed cost 1 Tailoring Machine 1 3500.00 2 Electric Motor ¼ H.P. 1 800.00 3 Cutting table /board 1 500.00 4 Scissors tap, Iron or Other 1 1000.00 Equipments 5 Others 1 200.00 Total 6000.00 74°51'0"E 74°52'0"E 74°53'0"E 74°54'0"E 74°55'0"E 74°56'0"E N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 0 0 5 5 ° ° 6 6 2 Legend 2 Macro Watershed Number (3 Nos) BASE MAP Micro Watershed Number (19 Nos) Census Village Location (9 Nos) Post & Telegraph Office (2 Nos) Worship Place (8 Nos) Major Road (8.71 Km) Medium Road (32.2 Km) Other Road (39.48 Km) 0 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1 State Highway (6.39 Km) Km Village Road (17.55 Km) Macro Watershed Boundary (11853.22 Ha) Micro Watershed Boundary (11853.22 Ha) 97 Village Boundary (5775.99 Ha) Key Map Gram Panchayat Boundary (5775.99 Ha) Dist. Ajmer Area of Interest (5775.99 Ha) 97/97 N N " Habitation/Settlement (29.67 Ha) " 0 ' Kathoda 0 Kishangarh ' 9 9 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 Ajmer 2 Khatoda Peesangan Nasirabad Sarwar Beawar Binay BHADOON Masuda Kekri Beawar Micro Watershed Boundary Area of Interest Joonda Joonda Roopangarh Roopangarh N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 8 8 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 09/01 2 08/18 ROOPANGARH 09/04 N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 7 7 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 2 08/17 08/01 09/02 09 Post Office S H - 7 Mordi N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 6 6 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 2 Mordi N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 5 5 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 2 08/15 08/02 08/16 Sursura Sursura S H -7 09/03 N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 4 4 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 Temple 2 Temple Temple Temple S H - 7 SURSURA 74°50'0"E 74°51'0"E 08/03 N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 3 3 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 2 08/13 S Ghaswan H - Ki Dhani 7 Ghaswan Ki Dhani Khatoli Khatoli N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 9 9 3 3 ° ° 6 6 2 2 08 08/04 08/06 N N " " 0 ' 7 0 - ' 2 H 2 4 S 4 ° ° 6 6 2 08/09 2 KHATOLI 7 - Mohan H S Pura 7 - H S 7 - H S Kali Mata 08 Temple 08/12 RALAWATAN Ralawatan N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 8 8 3 3 ° ° 6 6 2 2 Ralawatan Mohan Post Temple Idgah Office Pura Temple 08/08 7 - H S N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 1 1 4 4 ° ° 6 6 2 2 08/11 PROJECT 7 AJMER / SILORA / IWMP - XIII / 2011-12 - H S WATERSHED DEPARTMENT SUBMITTED TO GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN SUBMITTED BY 74°50'0"E 74°51'0"E 74°51'0"E 74°52'0"E 74°53'0"E 74°54'0"E 74°55'0"E 74°56'0"E 74°51'0"E 74°52'0"E 74°53'0"E 74°54'0"E 74°55'0"E 74°56'0"E N " 0 ' Legend 0 5 ° 6 2 0 9 M acro Watershed N um ber (3 Nos) 3 CONTOUR MAP 3 M icro Watershed N um ber (19 Nos) 9 0 C ensus Village Location (9 Nos) Tank for Cattle Drinking (3.11 Ha) 1471 3 1473 9 1463 0 Anicut (0.29 K m ) 1472 1579 15 89 15 88 14 62 395 1591 1464 1470 1590 1587 1474 15 78 M ajor Contour - 5m interval (HL -539), (LL -386) 1468 1596 1436 1437 1580 1599 1435 1469 15 92 1461 15 86 1597 1467 39 95 1465 5 M inor Contour - 1m interval (HL -539), (LL -386) 3 1438 1585 1584 1604 1598 1439 1581 1594 1476 1440 1466 1577 1583 First O rder Drainage (32580.25 M tr) 14 78 1576 1595 1456 1479 14 75 1455 1459 16 03 2 1582 1605 1443 390 1477 15 93 32 2 1458 1575 1563 S econd Order D rainage (17935.26 M tr) 15 38 1564 1690 5 4 1567 1601 1457 1565 5 1602 1480 9 95 1451 1454 3 3 5 1566 0 1691 1600 39 1537 39 0 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1 Third O rder Drainage (7044.01 M tr) 1689 1568 1562 1606 1574 1688 1682 16 07 1533 1534 Km 1452 16 8 6 1609 15 7 3 16 92 1481 1569 1561 1608 323 Fourth O rder Drainage (4692.46 M tr) 1571 1610 1453 1482 1687 16 84 1450 1572 1570 1535 & 1536 1612 1683 16 81 1678 3 1560 6 14 84 1483 16 80 1527 1529 1557 1611 16 14 Third O rder Drainage (0.02 H a) 14 86 1532 1685 1679 1449 14 84 1694 324 1615 1516 1558 1677 1613 1517 3 14 48 1530 15 31 15 59 9 1730 0 Fourth O rder Drainage (10.93 Ha) 1526 1556 39 5 39 1485 1518 0 1616 5 39 1729 16 76 325 9 5 1555 1554 3 1525 1519 16 95 ,1 72 1 & 17 2 2 1726 1727 102 W ater Body (11.6 H a) 1515 1731 32 6 11 1489 16 1 8 14 90 1553 5 1673 16 75 1675 1524 1520 9 1731 1617 10/1/1 15 1420 1491 1552 3 1733 16 72 0 172 8 9 97 327 M acro Watershed Boundary (11853.22 Ha) 3 1696 1725 395 10 /1 /2 1549 1740 1619 12 13 3 1492 1737 17 35 9 15 13 1514 1720 1724 173 4 328 1551 17 15 1671 5 14 15 21 1548 1723 17 44 1738 M icro Watershed Boundary (11853.22 Ha) 15 22 17 41 5 1629 32 0 Key Map 1550 17 16 1739 9 1669 1523 1510 1742 3 1620 332 1717 1743 1621 331 17 18 1745 1670 314 Dist. Ajmer 1546 329 1547 1697 319 315 Village Boundary (5775.99 Ha) 1493 1719 17 50 1754 1668 31 7 1713 1749 1622 1628 16 30 334 1511 1748 330 33 3 318 39 17 14 1747 1753 97/97 33 7 31 6 5 1751 16 31 15 09 /3 1545 33 8 1699 1746 1623 K hasra Boundary (5775.99 Ha) 17 52 1667 336 335 31 2 14 95 1496 1508 1705 1666 1632 34 4 313 15 09 /1 16 98 1624 N 14 94 16 65 16 2 7 N " 15 09 /2 1761 1626 1544/1 17 04 " 0 16 25 ' 339 1544/2 1700 311 0 Area of Interest (5775.99 Ha) 1703 1706 1712 16 33 Kishangarh ' 9 5 1507 342 345 9 4 1702 9 17 07 341 4 ° 15 44 /3 17 08 1709 17 11 1755 3 14 97 26 4/1 58 5 ° 6 17 01 1661 1635 39 1662 16 64 34 3 6 2 1498/1 1544/7 15 44 /5 1762 1658 346 347 1505 1659 Ajmer 2 15 44 /4 Roopangarh 16 34 1763 1660 348 15 0 6 1710 1663 1636 340 36 4 30 36 //1 78 8 //2 48 1 1760 35 2 1758 1756 1543 3038/1789 1759 16 39 5 1766 1764 16 37 349 175 7 354 35 1 365 9 1499 17 65 1638 3 17 89 1656 35 3 350 1498/2 19 20 1653 1650 401 3037/1789 16 57 1654 Peesangan 1798 1797 1796 35 5 Nasirabad 15 4 2 1767 16 52 16 51 1921 16 40 357 36 2 1641 402 1788 5 1917 1925 356 1503 15 04 39 1799 1916 366 39 5 403 3 1788/2481 1769 1768 1924 95 1500 1502 1790/1 1922 400 19 18 19 14 1927 393 13 82 1800 13 79 1919 1928 395/658 Sarwar 1378 13 81 1801 1926 19 23 394 1915 399 1501 13 83 1380 1790 17 87 1929 410 1909 1930 1643 404 5 1377 1907 Khatoda 9 412 Beawar 1786 1802 1906 1908 1931 367 3 Masuda Binay 1376 1785 1770 371 17 84 18 03 19 39 /24 71 387 1791 17 74 1771 386 392 13 72 4 18 89 1646 1644 00 1905 1904 1910 1913 1934 381 1773 1772 1939 5 411 17 95 1893 1902 1935 39 1775 18 79 1890 1912 00 39 7 1781 4 1933 1645 385 405 409 1903 19 37 1932 380 Kekri 1792 1783 1804 19 40 19 38 39 1 13 74 18 78 370 372 38 4 1776 19 36 1780 1805 Beawar 1375 17 93 1880 1894 19 4 1 17 75 1895 19 40 1944 19 52 19 53 379 396 398 1774 1891 1892 Micro Watershed Boundary 395 1806 1877 18 96 1901 369 373 383 1794 17 78 1911 1955 388 408 Area of Interest 17 95 1782 1945 390 423 1900 1943 1954 406 378 1819 1818 1876 1888 1897 194 2 1881 1886 1951 374 377 1870 18 08 1807 1956 38 9 13 73 /24 87 1809 1871 368 1817 & 1820 18 98 1946 18 75 376 407 425 13 73 1872 1882 1957 1821 1887 375 1816 1810 1873 1885 1869 19 93 1874 19 48 1884 18 83 1958 1815 1811 1865 1947 & 1949 18 67 18 68 1861 18 62 29 1812 1865 1866 1825 1863 1860 18 22 1814 18 24 18 23 1857 1858 1994 18 59 28/1 18 13 1854 18 54 18 32 1844 1851 1855 & 1856 1826 1850 24 /2 5 1843 9 3 1961 1827 1853 1845 1842 1959 1852 1849 23/1 & 24/1 Joonda 1828 25/1 1848 1841 1846 18 40 1962 26 1836 5 23/2 25/2 27/1 9 1999 21 3 1839 2000 27 /2 2001 1963 1838 22 1847 19 1837 2002 19 64 1995 1 20 2003 1998 1965 28 /2 2005 09/01 17 18 18 35 1966 7997 1834 1967 2007 2040 23/3 20 37 1996 1970 2038 2039 2045 20 46 5 2009 1968 9 2010 2008 1991 N 3 N " 4 2047 3 " 0 ' 2042 5 0 2013 1971 ' 8 2041 8 4 2015 4 ° 2014 2036 ° 6 2011 430 6 2 1972 2012 1969 2 2043 2044 2048 2017 425 395 2016 2035 1964 1973 2018 2034 2049 2019 2054 1975 2022 2023 20 55 2050 4 2021 2032 25 2053 1976 2092 2033 2020 2056 1977 1984 2025 2024 2031 2051 420 2052 4 95 15 3 2091 1983 1982 2026 2058 2057 1992 2030 2074 410 2027 5 1978 9 5 20 75 3 39 2071 2073 2028 2069 2070 2059 2061 2060 2072 2029 20 76 405 1981/3 2077 19 81 /1 19 79 2078 1981 2062 1986 2090 2063 2067 2068 2084 1980 2064 2083 19 81 /2 206 6 2081 2079 20 6 5 2087 400 1985 2089 20 88 1990 2235 2085 2080 2086 2082 1989 19 87 1988 1981/4 2185 2186 2187 21 88 2197 2221 2233 2236 2179 2194 2211 2222 5 2206 2207 2180 39 2195 2184 2213 2221/1 2196 2198 2189 2234 2205 2193 08/18 2231 2232 21 82 2199 2222 2219 2229 2237 2223 2181 2208 2212 2230 2200 2183 2190 2218 2191 2192 22 09 2210 22 03 2214 2228 22 85 2216 2178 2202 2204 2227 2201 2217 2226 3 2284 2224 2239 95 2282 2280 2238 09/04 2279 2286/1 2286/2 2283 2215 2225 2176/2488 2278 2281 2269 2249 2270 2240 2286/3 2267 2255 2251 2250 2247 2268 2254 2276 22 66 2253 2252 2287 2271 2246 2172 2256 2259 2248 22 75 2257 2317 2274 2245 2162 2318 2261 2173 2273 2244 2241 2272 2316 2258 2260 2314 2174 2312 22 65 2310 2295 2294 2264 2335 2315 2301 2262 2334 2311 2296 2293 2243 2313 2319 2292/1 3 N 2263 2307 N " 2308 2242 " 0 ' 2300 0 ' 7 2309 7 4 2 2306 4 ° ° 6 2297 2302 22 99 6 2 4 2321 2304 2 2322 23 05 10 2350 23 24 12 23 23 23 03 1/2 5/1 11/2 16/2 2337 2292/2 11 /4 11 /3 11 /5 2348/2 2353 2349/1 23 26 5/2 11/1 2333 2325 2327 6/2 6/1 23 58 2357/1 2338 2340 23 28 9 11/6 16/4 2354 23 48 /5 2349/2 13 2357 2329 2356 23 39 2355 2347/3 23 41 2292/3 1/1 16 40 2330 7 6/3 0 2347/2 2342 24 46 2331 14/2 2363/2460 2343 33/7 33/2 14/1 2367 2372 8/2 36 34 400 2384 2385 2332 33/3 16 /3 8/1 33/1 23 71 2344 23 86 14/3 2370 2346 32 0 2368 2387 2440 18 15 23 66 2374 2345 35 33/2 2383 2388 2443 33/6 2369 23 81 2442 33/5 5 2360/1 23 75 09/02 40 2376 2374 24 47 2450 33/4 2360 2380 2382 2389 2439 31 2365 2441 24 45 29 11 51 237 8 2434 28 19 23 6 0 /2 2364 2377 2399 2390 2449 20 2438 27 2361 2451 38 23 63 2391 2437 37 1149 2400 2444 2448 2362 2403 2459 2453 0 0 2435 21/1 21/2 0 40 0 09 1 2396 2436 2454 2452 4 2456 4 2397 2457 24 04 2398 2394 2405 2402 2401 39 12 14 2431 2395 2392 2458 400 2393 2433 2455 0 2430 40 26 25 2420 49/2 0 2421 2432 4 24 19 2427 22 1148 2406 425 2418 24 17 42 2422 53 41 50 24 400 2429 52 08/17 43 23 51 137 4 0 2 40 2416 2426 45 121 0 24 14 2423 2428 2407 44 08/01 54 49 122/2 116 1146 49/1 5 11 44 /2 60/3 122/1 136 41 11 4 4/1 2408 2415 80 138 2424 2425 59 55 12 2/3 2409 81 118 140/1 57 11 5 14 0/2 78 58 117 11 9 60 120 139/1 32 52 /11 4 4 82 12 2/4 48 13 9/2 5 32 53 /11 4 4 79 0 1147 84 46 135/2 135/1 2413 47 4 56 114 123 75/2 13 4/2 2411 62 110 141 2412 83 61 124 85 105 134/1 1143 107 11 3 134/3 75/1 10 6 77 13 4/4 1141 10 9 125 75/4 76 11 42 /2 75 /3 63 133 134/5 11 42 /2/1 70 64 30 83 /13 62 73 104/1 75 71 10 4/2 1136 72 128 11 39 11 42 /1 111 112 40 187 126 5 132/1 132/2 69 127 13 0 189/3 18 6 68 10 1 10 3 1138 1140 67 10 0 142 18 9/1 /1 189/2 86 102 405 185 74 11 32 18 9/3 /1 189 66 99 20 0/1 129 1137/3 189/3/2 89 131 1137/1 11 37 18 8/5 /1 & 1 98 /1 182 65 211/3 210/1 20 6 /1 /2 205 20 6/1 /1 20 5/1 201 182/1 182/2 90 211/1 21 0/2 200 198/2 96 97 98 152/2 211/4 210/3 206/1/3 202 18 3/2 180/1 94 /2 211/2 184 14 9 & 2 8 3 204 /1 /1 /2 92 14 7/2 0 211/5 209/1 20 1/1 20 0/3 18 3/1 154/3 151 405 1 20 4/1 /1 /1 20 2/1 190 94/1 95 4 21 2 200/4 213/1 20 9/2 207 20 1 /2 179/1 88 155 143 204/1/1 197/1 191 15 4/4 N 21 3/2 209/3 203 87 93 14 7/3 147/4 N " 212/3 200/2 181/1 204/2 17 8 144 " 0 ' 208 15 6 0 19 7 ' 6 177 158 214 172 152/1 6 4 19 2/2 178/2 145/1 4 ° 150 5 ° 6 1 192/1 181/2 15 7 171 6 2 4 217 147/8 154/1/2 2 176 17 0 154/1 15 4/2 14 5/2 25 2/1 3 215 193 196 173 166 216 19 5 160 159 146 165 16 9 14 7/1 /2 217/1 218 161 221/1 19 5/2 164 148 21 7/2 279/2 147/9 175 25 2/1 2 168 167 16 3 15 3/1 147/5 221/3/1 219/1 254/2 162 154/6 25 3 25 4/1 224 258/1 154/2 221 & 221 /2 221/3/2 219 266 410 223 222 254 22 5/1 220 27 5/6 276 15 3/2 147/6 274 27 9/2 14 7/1 0 147/7 0 265 Mordi 147/1 2 4 255/1 273 252/1/1 25 7 27 2/1 267 27 0 425 255/2 0 271 2 26 9 4 27 5/2 268 27 2/2 256 27 8/1 272/3 5 0 4 25 4 4 1 0 0 3 4 5 263 3 0 4 4 4 5 4 0 0 1 5 5 0 4 60 4 4 2 4 279/1 5 40 284 0 261/1 41 410 405 280 1083 1084 1088 05 4 1085 1082 1091 1089 1086 1087 285 1081 N 1092 N " " 0 ' 0 ' 5 5 4 1090 4 ° 10 ° 6 4 4 28 2 6 2 0 940 28 1 1093 5 2 1077 1094 939 941 10 97 937 1074 1098 938 1095 1101 1076 1096 936 935 934 1100 891 894 89 9 943 942 1099 900 1221 1106 12 20 1225 1226 1105 946 944 10 933 1219 4 89 0 94 5 1222 1224 898293 1227 1103 11 02 87 6 1109 1104 87 5 88 8 1230 12 29 1228 1074 1223 889 1110 1231 883 94 7 1108 08/15 1239 887 88 6 1107 1218 1232 1240 88 1 921 948 94 6 10 75 874 952 884 1217 88 5 1118 1117 1111 1216 1233 1238 1241 882 927 1119 1190 1208 1242 08/02 873 08/16 88 0 92 6 10 7 6 /2 0 7 5 87 8/2 44 1244 1120 1116 1115 1112 1189 1192 95 0 1191 12 4 3 951 1114 1215 866 1247 867 87 1 925 1124 1123 1113 86 5 961 1122 1121 1193 1207 872 95 7 954 1126 1209 1237 923 960 1125 1206 878 95 3 1194 1142 1143 12 48 1249 10 879 95 5 1072 4 96 6 1146 12 1 2 1211 1214 1236 1245 96 3 962 96 5 964 958 956 1136 1205 1234 86 4 972 10 75 95 9 1144 1187 1195 863 12 10 1246 971 1188 1204 12 35 1250 Sursura 1251 870 1166 862 87 7 97 0 & 9 7 5 1134 1186 1203 1213 1252 869 10 07 12 00 86 0 974 1008 1201 1144 1165 1070 11 99 861 86 8 1185 1184 10 06 1130 1284 859 1147 118 1294 997 10 03 1066 1255 854 1005 10 65 1183 129 2 1279 1254 1067 1164 1177 1178 12 58 858 10 68 1176 12 53 1289 1283 127 4 10 04 1175 856 1069 1149 1296 1295 1280 1006 1259 10 63 1285 857 1291 1256 85 5 1002 10 58 1150 1148 1167 1182 1275 1064 1055 1163 1133 1172 11 8 1 1293 12 57 999 1278 1277 1276 10 62 1299 85 0 1001 1152 11 51 1273 1272 1260 852 1056 11 55 1174 1173 1180 1302 1298 10 60 1303 853 99 8 1061 1282 851 1027 1171 1288 1286 1281 1168 1304 1287 994 1059 1158 1162 1290 1261 1057 1153 1160 1179 12 66 10 00 10 28 1159 1300 5 11 69 1 1301 4 4 84 9 1270 1262 10 1031 1170 13 05 1343 12 71 99 3 992 1033 1436 1433 1269 848 10 2 9 10 32 1154 1435 1410 1352 1265 1047 14 7 4 1030 1052 1434 1306 1342 1340 1339 1338 832 10 35 1049 1475 1432 1413 1415 1414 1268 1263 833 1156 1473 1437 1353 1351 1034 10 46 1477 14 38 1337 84 7 831 10 36 1048 1496 1408 1345 991 1026 1029/2064 1044 1476 1431 1411 1354 1309 10 38 10 40 1479 14 1 2 1267 1264 11 56 14 98 14 78 1472 1022 10 45 829 1043 1495 1355 835 1024 10 39 1439 1350 1335 10 25 10 23 10 37 1499 14 97 1430 1429 1405 1042 1480 1447 1308 830 10 11 10 41 1416 1358 1017 1021 1469 1417 13 07 13 56 1357 1348 10 12 1019 1404 1349 1347 1341 5 827 1016 1020 1470 1346 1344 41 1310 1481 1311 1312 10 15 82 3, 89 7 & 15 94 1500 1440 10 14 41 15 13 0 1428 1390 1359 82 5 10 13 10 1 8 150 2 14 94 1427 828 1512 1482 1468 1467 1446 1418 1363 845 82 6 824 15 14 1493 1448 1336 N 1520 1449 14 26 1402 15 26 1501 14 83 1450 1313 N " 15 27 1511 15 10 1391 0 84 4 1521 15 15 1441 1403 " 0 1 15 19 1315 ' 4 15 18 1492 1484 0 843 1509 ' 15 16 1420 1419 1360 1364 4 842 15 04 1491 14 85 1425 1314 15 06 1465 1466 4 4 14 63 1362 84 1 836 4 ° 1456 1451 1445 1389 1442 14 24 4 ° 6 837 1392 15 84 0 15 35 6 2 1401 1361 839 1400 2 1365 1316 838 1540 15 31 1317 15 41 1369 1368 1393 13 67 822 1543 139 8 1388 15 44 1366 15 42 1370 1545 1395 1334 1394 1321 1371 1374 1318 1387 1567 15 48 5 1547 13 35 1 1373 1331 09/03 4 08 1549 1330 1322 15 68 15 66 0 1372 15 51 2 1375 1320 5 1332 4 1333 82 1 1 1396 13 82 15 89 1570 4 1386 10 0 1329 1323 820 4 42 15 63 81 9 81 5 81 4 1588 15 78 15 71 1546 & 1564 420 816 1384 15 63 15 91 1579 15 61 1383 1376 818 1381 1379 1572 15 62 1378 1328 1587 20 1327 1319 81 7 81 3 20 59 420 4 41 15 76 1577 0 0 81 2 2 1580 1574 1566 4 138 0 1324 1377 81 0 1586 15 75 1565 161 0 13 27 /20 76 1592 16 11 15 85 1584 1326 159 3 1612 0 15 83 1581 1713 1325 2 15 95 15 81 /20 84 4 811 1596 16 08 1713 16 14 15 90 & 1 60 6 1712 15 98 0 1607 1707 42 17 20 1719 0 0 1597 1 17 11 2 4 4 1706 1721 1599 16 05 1714 1704 1716 16 00 1718 1715 1710 4 17 17 2 1722 1708 17 09 1703 0 16 09 17 23 16 58 5 41 16 01 20 16 03 1604 4 158 2 1702 1733 16 98 1701 1697 1660 17 24 16 9 6 17 05 16 61 1700 1732 1704 1699 16 63 1739 1695 410 1725 1731 1664 16 91 17 29 1730 1693 1741 1738 1692 1740 1694 1665 1728 17 42 16 67 17 43 17 35 17 26 1737 74°49'0 "E 74°50'0 "E 74°51'0 "E 1666 1727 1744 1750 1690 1676 1668 1736 1689 1674 16 70 1745 1671 1779 1672 1748 1746 1675 1752 1673 1749 1688 08/03 1747 1677 1780 1751 1781 1754 1674/2067 1778 17 81 /20 71 1678 1753 1755 1782 1775 1687 1680 38 5/1 0 1774 1679 4 1756 1757 1758 1681 1 1783 5 1784 1776 1682 1796 1773 385/11 1785 38 5/1 2 1786 17 76 /20 78 1772 1765 1759 1686 0 1790 1791 1771 N 2 1795 1797 N " 17 87 4 " 0 ' 1684 1683 50 1 0 1764 ' 3 1766 50 2 3 4 17 88 1799 1770 1761 1793 1760 1685 4 ° 1792 1769 ° 6 1763 6 2 1798 1767 18 02 2 1789 1794 1800 1762 384 19 50 50 3 64 7 17 68 18 03 382 48/5 72 /1 17 77 & 1 80 1 71 48/3 75 46 16 0 1/1 15 70/2/1 3 383 4 73 381 49 51 7/2 1/2 14 48/4 20 70 /2 /3 70/2/2 47 56/2 379 48/2 78 378 13 21 50 70/2/2/1 1/3 18 45 53/1/1 12 /1 5 76 5 48 /1 08/13 5 380 12/4 51 1 2 12/2 12 /3 44 70 /1 /1 4 0 5 37 3 12 57 4 9 5 5 10 12/5 43 33 4 509 19 8 5 0 5 9/1 46/1 69 /1 374 11 Ghaswan 52 77/1 0 377 58 63 5 6 5 8 41 /2 53/1/2 3 37 6 511 70 /1 /2 0 4 5 62 4 0 517/3 7 23/2 59/1 5 17 Ki Dhani 55 4 5 24 22 63 /2 4 375 1/5/1 27/1/1 43 4 5 59/2 77/2 3 1/5/2 9/2 56 61 5 4 372 510 27/2 42 2 23 41/1 53 /2 5 368 6 23/1/3 3 26 60/1 366 36 7 29/1 38 53 /2 /2 33 0 53/3/3 79/3 37 1 34 39 60/2 72 331 2 69 /2 80/2 0 27 /1 /2 29/2 33 35 43 25 37 64 28 65 68/1 370 5 40 369 36 80/1 515 53 /2 /1/1 31 80/3 333 4 51 4 30 5 80 415 41 33 5 & 3 4 0 146 344 365 34 5/2 5 355 32 80/4 5 5 34 5/2 2 35 4 147 3 2 208 34 5/2 4 4 34 5/2 345/17 Khatoli 4 345/11 0 36 4 66 67 7 5 4 2 5 36 0/1 520 34 5/4 363/1 516 81 0 5 8 1 345/23 34 7 84,85 & 360 0 5 345/5 4 152 52 3 83 82 1 346 5 34 3/5 5 348 361 0 41/4 34 5/2 0 N 5 N " 4 517 86/1 358 " 0 7 ' 0 5 95 41/2 & 311/41 ' 5 9 4 86 /2 4 9 4 3 1 84 91 7 3 ° 41/3 350 528 ° 1 0 4 6 4 41/5 6 5 480 2 6 92 5 518 2 79 63/2 85/2 0 42 45 148 152 85/1 7 0 81 52 4 527 89 4 4 80 547 93 4 44 351 352 548 5 41/6 & 315/41 43 82 0 86 & 86/2 86 /4 46 362 2 86/3 90 4 87 /5 46 526 87/1 83 465 52 124 126 149 94 41/7 & 316/41 88/1 41 /8 & 3 17 /4 1 51 125 5 75 41 4 53 50 48 224 95 127 519 87/2 41/8 & 318/41 12 3 88/2 08/04 59 49 47 122 87/3 40 47/1 58 128 522 39 521 87 & 87/2 56 520 22 3 48/80 12 0 50/2/2 57/2/1 11 9 41 /11 525 121 130 226 60 57/3 129 61 55 62 08/06 54 130/2 5 132 227 233 2 130/1 4 0 232 20 11 7 13 1 234 307 118 N N " 41/1 63 " 0 40 8 ' 114 0 27 7 133 228 ' 2 272 64 11 5 237 116 2 4 279 0 4 ° 3 273 27 8 11 3/2 4 23 1/3 ° 6 275 6 2 0 0 13 3/1 444/230 27 4 2 65 2 312 4 6 23 1/2 08/09 236 247 4 71/2 67 214 527/444 24 8 281 134 271 31 1 42 4 0 235 308 2 28 0 426 51 5 528/444 0 25 0 25 3 5 66 217 3 270 28 0 287 310 42 5 22 9 235 4 5 23 1/1 282 313 6 10 71/5 23 0 251 283 4 5 71/6 Mohan 213 28 4 31 4 30 9 05 71/8 22 6 286 315 5 4 38 71/9 230 28 5 316 320 2 69 Pura 258 31 9 5 135 238 0 257 30 1 500 70 68 212 4 256 431 429 4 269 318 72 26 5/2 33 254 43 0 23 0/2 25 25 3 25 9 260 27 6 31 7 302 75 239 4 211 243/2 241 28 8 222 221 24 0 110 14 1 25 5 43 4 437 76 77 43 2 242/1 26 1 267 434 111 13 6 262 79 139 43 8 78 242 80 13 8 137 10 9 21 0 142 260 08 206 252/1 251 42/2 82 84 209 24 2/2 & 37 2 /2 52 81 83 108 440 10 7 207 243 105 208 205 0 435 7 4 5 530 5 2 86 42 8/3 08/12 7 0 85 4 86 /2 1 106 141 14 0 80 4 5 51 253 48 0 90 5 184 250/2 4 05 183 204 5 9 5 244 4 00 142 254 12 4/2 202 20 3 421/184 20 1/1 5 24 9 250/3 42 5 143 5 9 0 0 4 9 5 4 453 8 0 201/2 19 6 4 5 18 5/1 6 4 0 4 6 103 5 198 4 10 1 197 18 5/2 5 4 5 4 10 2 255 245 4 4 0 27 0/2 45 4 187 4 35 26 1/1 4 4 199 195 18 1 182 257 59 6/2 46 200 19 4 19 1 Ralawatan 144/1/1 190 18 0 25 6 43 24 6 430 0 59 7/2 46 16 1 162 192 258 59 8/2 46 59 9/2 46 N N " 60 0/2 46 " 0 34 6/1 44 /1 /3 ' 163 18 8 177 & 179 0 189 26 0 582/258 ' 112 8 193 8 3 3 ° 526/179 160 16 7 ° 6 17 5 164 53 1/3 61 6 2 52 5 /1 7 9 345 /1 44/1/2 524/179 2 165 361/1 78 259 17 7 & 3 8 5/1 77 60 1/2 46 15 9 168 506/177 50 2/3 85 248 16 6 513 5 169 507/377 3 176 503/385 4 15 8 145/1/1 171/8 457/361 262 145/1/2 17 4 170 17 1/2 178 157/2 306/167 274 263 145 544/177 34 9/1 45 15 6 26 1 49 7/2 73 148/1 42 155 0 5 157/1 172 08/08 59 2/2 75 4 4 275 47 9/2 73 264 4 4 154 173 411/152 276 100/4 148/3 412/152 47 2/2 73 26 5/2 14 7 152/2 460/273 35 0/1 45 /3 153 14 8 & 1 48 /2 39 9/1 33 /2 25 402/152 467/273 4 152/3 393/348 413/152 278 438/273 152/4 404/155 415/152 279 150 277 150/1 14 9 352/1 35 6/1 52 877 405/152 280 15 0/1 /2 356 /1 52 53 8/3 52 465/371 482/356 152/2 52 3/2 82 378/370 456/2 82 N 270 N " 445 " 0 ' 28 3/1 70 0 ' 1 1 4 4 ° 38 3/1 3 ° 6 0 4 283 6 2 4 284 2 42 0/2 86 08/11 28 6 PR O JEC T AJM ER / SILO RA / IW M P - XIII / 2011-12 450 0 4 4 WATER SH ED DEPARTM EN T SU BM ITTED TO GO VER N M EN T O F R AJASTH AN 924/1 11 0/2 924/2 5 4 SU BM ITTED BY 4 5 2 74°49'0 "E 74°50'0 "E 74°51'0 "E 4 5 2 4 74°51'0"E 74°52'0"E 74°53'0"E 74°54'0"E 74°55'0"E 74°56'0"E