DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site MMIINNNNEESSOOTTAA AARRMMYY NNAATTIIOONNAALL GGUUAARRDD CCAAMMPP RRIIPPLLEEYY TTRRAAIINNIINNGG CCEENNTTEERR AANNDD AARRDDEENN HHIILLLLSS AARRMMYY TTRRAAIINNIINNGG SSIITTEE 22001111 CCOONNSSEERRVVAATTIIOONN PPRROOGGRRAAMM RREEPPOORRTT 22001111 Cover Photography: Chimney swift artificial nesting tower, Arden Hills Army National Guard Training Site, 2011, with permission courtesy of Craig Mullenbach Minnesota Army National Guard Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site 2011 Conservation Program Report January 1 – December 31, 2011 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota Army National Guard Compiled by Brian J. Dirks, Animal Survey Coordinator Nancy J. Dietz, Animal Survey Assistant MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CAMP RIPLEY SERIES REPORT NO. 21 ©2012, State of Minnesota Contact Information: DNR Information Center 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 (651) 296-6157 1-888-MINNDNR (646-6367) Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (651) 296-5484 1-800-657-3929 www.dnr.state.mn.us This report should be cited as follows: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Army National Guard. Minnesota Army National Guard, Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site, 2011 Conservation Program Report, January 1- December 31, 2011. Compiled by Brian J. Dirks and Nancy J. Dietz, Camp Ripley Series Report No. 21, Little Falls, USA. 223 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. V INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 1 PARTNERSHIPS .................................................................................................................................................. 2 PROGRAM AREAS .............................................................................................................................................. 2 CAMP RIPLEY TRAINING CENTER .......................................................................................................... 2 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................... 4 Natural Resources ............................................................................................................................ 7 Forestry ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Forest Inventory ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Forest Cover Types.................................................................................................................................. 7 Forest Inventory and Analysis – Northern Research Station ................................................................. 10 Timber Sales .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Fuelwood Permits .................................................................................................................................. 13 Tree Planting ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Insects and Diseases .............................................................................................................................. 16 Land Fund ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Vegetation Management ............................................................................................................................. 22 Prescribed Fire ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Invasive Plants ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Restoration Project for Spotted Knapweed and Common Tansy Areas ............................................ 26 Updating Distribution Maps for Common Tansy, Leafy Spurge, and Spotted Knapweed................ 26 Invasive Species Management Program Development ..................................................................... 27 2011-2012 Research ......................................................................................................................... 27 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Surface Water Monitoring ..................................................................................................................... 30 Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Species in Greatest Conservation Need ................................................................................................. 31 Birds ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Christmas Bird Count ....................................................................................................................... 31 Songbirds .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Totals and Trends......................................................................................................................... 32 Minnesota Breeding Bird Atlas ........................................................................................................ 36 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) ............................................................................................ 37 Bald Eagle Permits ....................................................................................................................... 39 Osprey (Pandion haleaetus) ............................................................................................................. 41 Owl Surveys ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) .................................................................................................... 44 Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buccinator) .............................................................................................. 48 Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) Nest Boxes ............................................................................................... 49 Black Tern (Chlidonias niger) .......................................................................................................... 49 Page i 2010 Conservation Program Report Red-headed Woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) ................................................................. 51 Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) Nest Boxes ...................................................................................... 51 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................... 53 Gray Wolf (Canis lupus)................................................................................................................... 53 Federal Court Decision ................................................................................................................ 53 Wolf Monitoring Background ...................................................................................................... 55 Wolf Movements ......................................................................................................................... 55 Black Bear (Ursus americanus) ........................................................................................................ 61 Research ....................................................................................................................................... 61 Mortalities and Reproduction ....................................................................................................... 61 Cougar (Puma concolor) and Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis) Detection Survey ........................... 62 Fisher (Martes pennanti) .................................................................................................................. 65 Carnivore Scent Station Survey ........................................................................................................ 70 Beaver (Castor canadensis) .............................................................................................................. 70 Porcupine (Erethizon dorsatum) ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Need and Reasonableness: August 10, 2012
    CADDISFLIES ONLY Notations Used E Endangered T Threatened SC Special Concern N None (location records maintained by DNR, in most cases) N (X) None, and probably extirpated from Minnesota (location records maintained by DNR, in most cases) -- None (location records not yet maintained by DNR) * Change in scientific name accompanies change in status CHANGE IN STATUS; STATUS SHEET PROVIDED Common Name Scientific Name Current Proposed Status Status A Species of Northern Caddisfly Anabolia ozburni -- SC * A Species of Northern Caddisfly Asynarchus rossi SC T A Species of Long Horned Caddisfly Ceraclea brevis SC N Vertrees's Ceraclean Caddisfly Ceraclea vertreesi SC N Headwaters Chilostigman Caddisfly Chilostigma itascae E T A Species of Caddisfly Goera stylata -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila novicola SC N A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila quinola -- SC A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila rono -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila waskesia -- E A Species of Northern Caddisfly Ironoquia punctatissima -- T A Species of Caddisfly Lepidostoma libum -- T A Species of Northern Caddisfly Limnephilus janus -- E A Species of Northern Caddisfly Limnephilus secludens -- E A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Ochrotrichia spinosa -- E A Species of Long Horned Caddisfly Oecetis ditissa -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Oxyethira ecornuta SC T A Species of Netspinning Caddisfly Parapsyche apicalis -- T A Species of Tube Casemaker Caddisfly Polycentropus glacialis -- T A Species
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Animals in the Hardwood Hills and Pine Moraines and Outwash Plains Ecological Subsections of West-Central Minnesota Final Report
    Rare Animals in the Hardwood Hills and Pine Moraines and Outwash Plains Ecological Subsections of West-Central Minnesota Final Report Prepared by Elizabeth Harper Gerda Nordquist Steve Stucker Carol Hall Minnesota County Biological Survey Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Biological Report No. 86 February 2006 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 2 Methods.................................................................................................................................. 4 Survey Site Selection ................................................................................................. 4 Survey Timing and Techniques ................................................................................. 4 Small mammal Surveys ...................................................................................... 4 Foraging Bat Surveys........................................................................................... 5 Breeding-season Bird Surveys............................................................................. 6 Amphibian and Reptile Surveys .......................................................................... 7 Nongame Fish Surveys .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation for US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements
    Draft Biological Evaluation for US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Prepared for: US Forest Service, Chippewa National Forest Minnesota Department of Natural Resources May 2014 US Highwy 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Biological Evaluation This Biological Evaluation was prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, National Forest Management Act, and other applicable laws and regulations. For additional information, please contact the team leader for the US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Project. Ms. Christine Brown Chippewa National Forest Address: 200 Ash Avenue NW Cass Lake, MN 56633 Phone: (218) 335-8600 TTY: (218) 335-8632 FAX: (218)335-8637 Prepared by: ______________________________________ _______________ Antony Randazzo, HDR Engineering, Inc. Date Reviewed by: ______________________________________ _______________ Kirk W. Larson, U.S. Forest Service Date Chippewa National Forest Reviewed by: ______________________________________ _______________ Cory Mlodik, U.S. Forest Service Date Chippewa National Forest May 2014 Signature Page Page i US Highwy 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Biological Evaluation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Us National Guard and Public Order Management June 2020
    THE US NATIONAL GUARD AND PUBLIC ORDER MANAGEMENT JUNE 2020 I. OVERVIEW1 activation is not the purpose or purview of this brief. Regardless of the mission, any deployment In the past two weeks, governors in as many as of the National Guard in support of domestic law 23 US states and Washington, DC have mobilized enforcement raises critical issues for consideration state National Guard units to support local law by State and National Guard leadership. enforcement in the response to protests against racism and police brutality.2 These units have National Guard personnel deployed to provide been involved in at least one lethal use of force direct or indirect support to law enforcement incident: according to state officials, a Kentucky during protests could become involved in National Guard member was responsible for the situations involving the use of force or physical fatal shooting of David McAtee during protests confrontations with protestors. Guard members in Louisville, Kentucky on June 1. Other Guard may also be placed in circumstances in which members as well as the Louisville Metro Police they witness or become complicit in misconduct were also involved in the incident. by local police units. In the last week, CIVIC staff contacted a number of National Guard units and As a matter of principle, Center for Civilians found that very few have provided clear or explicit in Conflict (CIVIC) generallywarns against the directions for Guard members to deal with these deployment of military or military-like units to situations, or guidance to the public on how best to manage public order, including protests and report any concerns they may have with National curfews, given the risk of escalation of violence Guard personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on the National Guard and Reserves 2521 S
    COMMISSION ON THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES 2521 S. CLARK STREET, SUITE 650 ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202 ARNOLD L. PUNARO The Honorable Carl Levin The Honorable John McCain CHAIRMAN Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee on Armed Services on Armed Services WILLIAM L. BALL, III United States Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 LES BROWNLEE RHETT B. DAwsON The Honorable Ike Skelton The Honorable Duncan Hunter Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee LARRY K. ECKLES on Armed Services on Armed Services United States House of United States House of PATRICIA L. LEWIS Representatives Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 DAN MCKINNON WADE ROWLEY January 31, 2008 JAMES E. SHERRARD III Dear Chairmen and Ranking Members: DONALD L. STOCKTON The Commission on the National Guard and Reserves is pleased to submit to E. GORDON STUMP you its final report as required by Public Law 108-375, the Ronald Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by J. STANTON THOMpsON Public Law 109-163). As you know, Congress chartered this Commission to assess the reserve component of the U.S. military and to recommend changes to ensure that the National Guard and other reserve components are organized, trained, equipped, compensated, and supported to best meet the needs of U.S. national security. The Commission’s first interim report, containing initial findings and the description of a strategic plan to complete our work, was delivered on June 5, 2006. The second interim report, delivered on March 1, 2007, was required by Public Law 109-364, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, enacted on October 17, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota National Guard
    MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD 2016 ANNUAL REPORT & 2017 OBJECTIVES MMXVI 2 | LETTER FROM THE ADJUTANT GENERAL 3 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD PRIORITIES 5 | DIVERSITY 6 | COMPETENT READY FORCE 7 | OPTIMAL FORCE STRUCTURE 8 | BEYOND THE YELLOW RIBBON 9 | SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 10 | CYBER SECURITY & RESPONSE 11 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD | MAJOR COMMANDS 13 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD | AROUND THE WORLD 15 | JOINT FORCE HEADQUARTERS 16 | 34TH RED BULL INFANTRY DIVISION 17 | 2017 YEAR OF THE RED BULLS: 34TH INFANTRY DIVISION CENTENNIAL CONTENTS 19 | 34TH COMBAT AVIATION BRIGADE TO THE CITIZENS OF MINNESOTA 20 | 1 ST ARMORED BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM 21 | 347TH REGIONAL SUPPORT GROUP Minnesota’s steadfast commitment to advancing our National Guard priorities have yielded measurable results, and I know that our force is better manned, equipped and 22 | 84TH TROOP COMMAND trained to take on any challenge that the future may hold for our great team. As I begin my last full year as Minnesota’s Adjutant General, I swell with pride about the incredible results that Minnesota’s Soldiers and Airmen have accomplished on behalf of our state and nation during my seven-year term. 23 | 175TH REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE 24 | CAMP RIPLEY TRAINING CENTER 2016 has indeed emphasized that our service members are committed to advancing the journey that began in 2010. By all measurements, we are more diverse and inclusive; not one, but two, female leaders were promoted to general officer in 2016. We are a more competent, ready force; Minnesota has established the standard by which reserve 25 | 133rd AIRLIFT WING force readiness is measured. We have moved the bar for optimal force structure; Minnesota continues to advance partnerships with major commands to ensure the correct 26 | 148TH FIGHTER WING equipment and people can assist our national and state security.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fish Habitat Partnership
    A Fish Habitat Partnership Strategic Plan for Fish Habitat Conservation in Midwest Glacial Lakes Engbretson Underwater Photography September 30, 2009 This page intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. BACKGROUND 7 II. VALUES OF GLACIAL LAKES 8 III. OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS TO GLACIAL LAKES 9 IV. AN ECOREGIONAL APPROACH 14 V. MULTIPLE INTERESTS WITH COMMON GOALS 23 VI. INVASIVES SPECIES, CLIMATE CHANGE 23 VII. CHALLENGES 25 VIII. INTERIM OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS 26 IX. INTERIM PRIORITY WATERSHEDS 29 LITERATURE CITED 30 APPENDICES I Steering Committee, Contributing Partners and Working Groups 33 II Fish Habitat Conservation Strategies Grouped By Themes 34 III Species of Greatest Conservation Need By Level III Ecoregions 36 Contact Information: Pat Rivers, Midwest Glacial Lakes Project Manager 1601 Minnesota Drive Brainerd, MN 56401 Telephone 218-327-4306 [email protected] www.midwestglaciallakes.org 3 Executive Summary OUR MISSION The mission of the Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership is to work together to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance sustainable fish habitats in glacial lakes of the Midwest for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations. Glacial lakes (lakes formed by glacial activity) are a common feature on the midwestern landscape. From small, productive potholes to the large windswept walleye “factories”, glacial lakes are an integral part of the communities within which they are found and taken collectively are a resource of national importance. Despite this value, lakes are commonly treated more as a commodity rather than a natural resource susceptible to degradation. Often viewed apart from the landscape within which they occupy, human activities on land—and in water—have compromised many of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Land Management Plan
    2009 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (Updated Annual Harvest Plan -2014) Itasca County Land Department 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Itasca County Land Department Acknowledgements This Land Management Plan was produced by Itasca County Land Department employees Garrett Ous, Dave Marshall, Michael Gibbons, Adam Olson, Bob Scheierl, Roger Clark, Kory Cease, Steve Aysta, Tim Stocker, Perry Leone, Wayne Perreault, Blair Carlson, Loren Eide, Bob Rother, Andrew Brown, Del Inkman, Darlene Brown and Meg Muller. Thank you to all the citizens for their sincere input and review during the public involvement process. And thank you to Itasca County Commissioners Lori Dowling, Karen Burthwick, Rusty Eichorn, Catherine McLynn and Mark Mandich for their vision and final approval of this document. Foreword This land management plan is designed for providing vision and direction to guide strategic and operational programs of the Land Department. That vision and direction reflects a long standing connection with local economic, educational and social programs. The Land Department is committed to ensuring that economic benefits and environmental integrity are available to both present and future generations. That will be accomplished through actively managing county land and forests for a balance of benefits to the citizens and for providing them with a sustained supply of quality products and services. The Department will apply quality forestland stewardship practices, employ modern technology and information, and partner with other forest organizations to provide citizens with those quality products and services. ________________________________ Garrett Ous September, 2009 Itasca County Land Commissioner 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 ICLD - LMP Section i., page 1 of 3 Itasca County Land Department Land Management Plan Table of Contents i.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Minnesota Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera)
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources BIODIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CADDISFLIES (INSECTA: TRICHOPTERA) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY DAVID CHARLES HOUGHTON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ralph W. Holzenthal, Advisor August 2002 1 © David Charles Houghton 2002 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As is often the case, the research that appears here under my name only could not have possibly been accomplished without the assistance of numerous individuals. First and foremost, I sincerely appreciate the assistance of my graduate advisor, Dr. Ralph. W. Holzenthal. His enthusiasm, guidance, and support of this project made it a reality. I also extend my gratitude to my graduate committee, Drs. Leonard C. Ferrington, Jr., Roger D. Moon, and Bruce Vondracek, for their helpful ideas and advice. I appreciate the efforts of all who have collected Minnesota caddisflies and accessioned them into the University of Minnesota Insect Museum, particularly Roger J. Blahnik, Donald G. Denning, David A. Etnier, Ralph W. Holzenthal, Jolanda Huisman, David B. MacLean, Margot P. Monson, and Phil A. Nasby. I also thank David A. Etnier (University of Tennessee), Colin Favret (Illinois Natural History Survey), and Oliver S. Flint, Jr. (National Museum of Natural History) for making caddisfly collections available for my examination. The laboratory assistance of the following individuals-my undergraduate "army"-was critical to the processing of the approximately one half million caddisfly specimens examined during this study and I extend my thanks: Geoffery D. Archibald, Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chruściki = Trichoptera
    POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGICZNY KATALOG FAUNY POLSKI Catalogue faunae Poloniae Część XXVIII CHRUŚCIKI T rich optera O p ra c o w a ł CEZARY TOMASZEWSKI PAŃSTWOWE WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE WARSZAWA 1965 http://rcin.org.pl Plan podziału na części wydawnictwa «KATALOG FAUNY POLSKI» Część I — Protozoa „ I I — Porifera, Coelenterata „ III — Turbellaria „ IV — Monogenoidea, Trematoda „ V — Cestoda „ VI — Nemertini „ VII — Nematoda „ VIII— Nematomorpha, Gastrotricha, Kinorhyncha, Priapuloidea „ IX — Rotatoria „ X — A canthocephala „ °XI —Annelida „ XII —Entomostraca „ XIII —Malacostraca „ XIV — Symphyla, Pauropoda, Diplopoda, Chilopoda „ *XV — Apterygota „ X V I— Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Plecoptera „ XVII — Blattodea, Montodea, Orthoptera, Dermaptera „ XVIII — Psocoptera „ XIX — Mallophaga, Anoplura „ XX— Thysanoptera , , XXI —Homoptera „ XXII — Heteroptera „ XXIII — Coleoptera „ XXIV — Strepsiptera „ XXV — Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera „ XXVI — Hymenoptera „ XXVII — Mecoptera „ XXVIII — Trichoptera „ XXIX — Lepidoptera „ X X X — Diptera „ *XXXI — Aphaniptera „ °XXXII — Pseudoscorpionidea, Opiliones „ XXXIII — Araneida „ XXXI W — Acari ,, XXXV — Pentastomida, Pantopoda, Tardigrada „ XXXVI — Mollusca „ XXXVII —Bryozoa, Chaetognatha, Echinodermata, Tunicata „ XXXVIII — Agnatha, Pisces „ XXXIX — Amphibia, Reptilia » XL —A ves » XLI —Mammalia * — Części wydane w całości о — Części, z których wydano poszczególne zeszyty. http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGICZNY KATALOG FAUNY POLSKI Catalogue faunae Poloniae część; XXVIII CHRUŚCIKI T r i с li o p t e L* a Opracował CEZARY TOMASZEWSKI PAŃSTWOWE WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE WARSZAWA 1965 http://rcin.org.pl KOLEGIUM REDAKCYJNE: doc. dr Wł. B a z y l u k , dr R. Bielawski (sekretarz), prof. dr St. Feliksiak, mag. A. G o l j a n , prof. dr E. G r a b d a , prof. dr T. J a c z e w s k i (przewodni­ czący), doc.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Cover photography: Blanding’s turtle (Emys blandingii) hatchling, Camp Ripley Training Center, August 2018. Photography by Camp Ripley Envrionmental staff. Minnesota Army National Guard Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site 2018 Conservation Program Report January 1 – December 31, 2018 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota Army National Guard MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CAMP RIPLEY SERIES REPORT NO. 28 ©2019, State of Minnesota Contact Information: MNDNR Information Center 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, MN 55155-4040 (651) 296-6157 Toll Free 1-888-MINNDNR (646-6367) TYY (Hearing Impaired) (651) 296-5484 1-800-657-3929 www.dnr.state.mn.us This report should be cited as follows: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Army National Guard. 2019. Minnesota Army National Guard, Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site, 2018 Conservation Program Report, January 1 – December 31, 2018. Compiled by Katie Retka, Camp Ripley Series Report No. 28, Little Falls, MN, USA. 234 pp. Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Camp Ripley Training Center .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Ripley and Arden Hills Minnesota Army National Guard Training Sites Conservation Program Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp CCAAMMPP RRIIPPLLEEYY AANNDD AARRDDEENN HHIILLLLSS MMIINNNNEESSOOTTAA AARRMMYY NNAATTIIOONNAALL GGUUAARRDD TTRRAAIINNIINNGG SSIITTEESS CCOONNSSEERRVVAATTIIOONN PPRROOGGRRAAMM RREEPPOORRTT 22000099 AANNNNUUAALL RREEPPOORRTT Mississippi River © BillMARCHEL.com Cover Photography: Mississippi River, courtesy Bill Marchel, copyright BillMarchel.com. Camp Ripley and Arden Hills Minnesota Army National Guard Training Sites Conservation Program Report 2009 Annual Report January 1 – December 31, 2009 Brian J. Dirks, Animal Survey Coordinator Nancy J. Dietz, Animal Survey Assistant Division of Ecological Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota Army National Guard MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CAMP RIPLEY SERIES REPORT NO. 19 ©2010, State of Minnesota This report should be cited as follows: Dirks, B. J. and N. J. Dietz. 2010. Camp Ripley and Arden Hills Minnesota Army National Guard Training Sites Conservation Program Report – 2009 Annual Report, January 1-December 31, 2009. Camp Ripley Series Report No. 19, Little Falls, USA. 245 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]