DOCSLIB.ORG

Top 100 Engineers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

40topengineersnj 3/10/08 16:58 Page 66 TOP 100 ENGINEERS Rank Practice Engineering staff Total UK Total UK staff Offices chartered staff 2008 2007 Total Civil Structural Mechanical Electrical Other 2008 2007 2008 2007 UK Worldwide 11Atkins 4,365 1,161 188 399 283 2,334 6,340 5,995 12,066 12,636 106 190 22Mott MacDonald 1,750 950 210 250 275 65 2,584 2,750 11,500 13,000 52 120 3–Halcrow Group 1,527 1,256 160 55 56 0 na 2,106 7,140 8,335 26 72 43Mouchel 1,425 327 56 58 42 942 363 518 7,458 10,687 12 18 55WSP Group 1,282 333 308 192 115 334 1,139 1,320 2,553 3,017 52 252 64Arup 1,249 521 329 200 85 114 1,210 1,388 8,175 10,232 18 85 76=Faber Maunsell/AECOM 1,204 715 125 200 135 29 1,133 1,265 2,981 3,277 25 175 86=Jacobs 1,161 1,002 90 44 25 0 1,338 1,442 6,801 7,350 43 53 98Scott Wilson 926 209 143 43 44 487 1,014 1,053 5,683 6,270 40 80 10 9 Hyder Consulting (UK) 882 451 202 11 22 196 937 1,014 1,646 1,979 19 38 11 10 Waterman Group 861 411 235 75 35 105 792 861 1,830 2,080 34 48 12 12 Capita Symonds 780 258 147 56 42 277 1,493 1,669 3,783 4,024 50 50 13 11 White Young Green/Tweeds 762 228 186 57 51 240 1,050 1,090 2,505 2,598 23 34 14 13 Parsons Brinckerhoff 661 205 29 108 212 107 334 740 1,599 1,754 14 121 15 – MWH UK 521 364 27 44 49 37 585 629 6,000 7,000 16 173 16 – Grontmij 398 205 9 44 68 72 284 437 7,000 7,500 19 33 17 14 Buro Happold 384 67 108 56 38 115 353 407 1,358 1,721 9 26 18 15 Hoare Lea 323 0 0 207 116 0 244 323 637 715 10 11 19 16 WA Fairhurst and Partners 275 158 58 0 0 59 275 306 503 540 15 15 20 21 RPS Group 263 106 89 34 34 0 368 432 2,063 2,483 78 127 21 17 Mace 236 103 11 122 0 0 788 901 2,002 2,200 10 25 22 19 Hilson Moran 234 0 6 153 62 13 208 234 280 297 3 6 23 22 Pell Frischmann 194 125 47 11 11 0 227 203 1,159 1,193 14 26 24 18 TPS 183 103 44 19 17 0 399 360 504 460 8 9 25 26 EC Harris 179 17 0 110 0 52 1,722 2,090 3,302 3,830 18 41 26 – Ramboll Whitbybird 174 15 117 17 17 8 128 177 555 852 10 17 27 24 Gifford 165 63 49 24 0 29 143 165 642 769 9 14 28 30 Halcrow Yolles 157 62 63 10 6 16 112 167 705 871 10 18 29= 25 DSSR 145 0 0 80 59 6 145 148 242 246 5 5 29= 23 Peter Brett Associates 145 78 11 2 2 52 201 145 na 618 11 18 31 27 Building Design Partnership 136 0 41 55 0 40 597 649 1,141 1,310 10 15 32 29 Cundall Johnston & Partners 123 20 23 38 36 6 112 123 365 432 5 14 33 31 URS Corporation 106 45 41 7 3 10 106 115 891 938 14 404 34 – JNP Group 97 97 na 97 110 110 6 6 35 33 Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) 95 26 26 17 20 6 89 110 5,500 6,500 8 46 36 32 Troup Bywaters & Anders 94 0 0 61 27 6 96 94 197 213 8 23 37 34 Silcock Dawson & Partners 91 0 0 45 38 8 75 91 118 137 4 4 38 38= Clarke Bond Group 72 22 43 0 0 7 64 78 196 240 8 9 39 36= Pick Everard 69 33 13 15 8 0 108 129 312 380 9 11 40 38= Curtins Consulting Engineers 60 28 32 0 0 0 60 60 180 178 11 11 41 76= Franklin + Andrews 55 13 1 19 2 20 609 500 780 794 21 32 42 40 Currie & Brown 51 9 9 2 7 24 203 301 406 543 13 38 43= 49 Price & Myers 47 0 47 0 0 0 36 47 146 160 3 3 43= 43= Wallace Whittle 47 0 0 28 16 3 41 47 147 156 6 7 45= 41 Lend Lease Projects 46 9 10 12 3 12 200 210 345 346 10 10 45= 53 Rider Levett Bucknall 46 11 8 15 12 0 230 349 2,050 2,250 9 74 45= 48 NPS Property Consultants 46 8 20 17 1 225 238 1,043 1,117 27 27 48 46= Slender Winter Partnership 45 0 0 22 23 0 36 45 na 55 2 2 49 – Campbell Reith Hill 44 12 28 0 0 4 36 44 120 152 5 7 50= 46= Thomasons 40 14 25 0 0 1 44 45 118 129 5 5 50= 46= Clancy Consulting 40 15 21 7 7 1 40 42 169 193 7 8 Key to all tables on page 79 Key 10.10.2008 BUILDING MAGAZINE 40topengineersnj 3/10/08 16:58 Page 67 top 250 consultants / 67 Rank Practice Engineering staff Total UK Total UK staff Offices chartered staff 2008 2007 Total Civil Structural Mechanical Electrical Other 2008 2007 2008 2007 UK Worldwide 52 – AKSWard 37 15 22 0 0 0 27 40 106 116 5 5 53 51 Frankham Consultancy Group 35 7 8 6 6 8 100 102 193 203 5 5 54 52 Zisman Bowyer & Partners 34 0 0 17 12 5 30 34 60 66 1 1 55 76= Hill International (UK) 33 18 2 3 2 8 78 158 1,524 2,081 13 76 56= – Alan Baxter & Associates 28 12 16 0 0 0 36 38 160 151 1 1 56= 57= Conisbee 28126001028637211 58 – Jenkins & Potter 27 27 0 0 0 25 27 75 76 3 3 59 61= Balfour Beatty Professional Services 25 6 1 8 10 0 138 173 426 560 6 33 60= – RMJM 23 0 13 5 3 2 142 162 1,200 na 4 15 60= 54= Skanska Technology 23 12 9 1 1 0 26 23 81 76 2 2 60= 66= Walsh Group 23 6 17 0 0 0 16 23 100 125 3 5 63 59= Hannah-Reed 22 17 10 0 0 6 26 25 90 98 4 4 64 – Synergy Construction & Property 21 0 0 0 0 21 46 80 75 124 10 10 65= 61= UKBS 20 4 4 7 5 0 227 223 539 537 34 34 65= 57= Hulley and Kirkwood 20 0 0 12 8 0 19 20 169 176 10 10 65= – NDC 2000 20 0 0 10 10 0 20 20 100 104 6 6 68 64= Max Fordham 19 0 0 19 0 17 19 159 154 3 3 69= 63 McBains Cooper 18 1 6 7 4 0 144 149 248 263 8 9 69= – Powell Tolner & Associates 18 5 13 0 0 0 19 19 41 40 6 7 69= – The Health and Safety People 18 0 0 0 0 18 14 18 68 81 2 2 72 50 Robert West Consulting 17 11 5 0 1 0 35 17 81 67 4 4 73= 70= Ridge 16 0 1 6 8 1 118 136 220 268 11 11 73= 66= Colin Toms & Partners 16 4 12 0 0 0 16 16 34 35 1 1 73= 76= Silcock Leedham 16 0 0 9 7 0 12 16 26 31 2 4 76= 72= Urban Design – Birmingham council 15 0 2 4 4 5 61 77 241 269 1 1 76= 79= HBG Design 15 0 7 5 3 0 23 27 73 88 1 1 78= 72= Devereux Architects/PM Group 14 2 1 3 4 4 63 66 180 115 4 16 78= 81= Michael Barclay Partnership 14 0 14 0 0 0 10 14 32 35 2 2 80= 85= PRP Architects 12 0 0 0 0 12 217 235 370 398 4 6 80= 89= Calfordseaden 12 1 1 7 3 0 79 90 221 261 4 4 80= – PEP Civil & Structures 12 3 9 0 0 0 18 18 46 46 2 2 80= 70= HCD Group 12 1 11 0 0 0 93 96 126 130 12 12 84 64= Urban Vision 11 9 1 0 1 0 102 121 222 295 2 2 85= 81= Ingleton Wood 10 0 0 5 5 0 65 66 118 126 5 5 85= 87= Davis Langdon 10 0 0 0 0 10 950 1,186 1,593 1,821 20 104 85= 81= Gardiner & Theobald 10 5 1 1 0 3 700 765 1,600 1,750 23 53 85= 81= Riley Consulting 10 2 0 4 2 2 78 95 168 192 10 10 85= – Kirk Saunders Associates 1028000710243122 90= – Bidwells Building Consultancy 9 1 6 0 0 2 29 42 54 71 13 13 90= 66= Faithful + Gould (part of Atkins) 9 0 0 0 0 9 826 817 1,180 1,271 27 56 92= 87= Hadfield Cawkwell Davidson 8 0 8 0 0 0 48 49 89 99 1 1 92= 79= ChandlerKBS 8 8 0 0 0 0 105 98 209 195 6 9 92= – Tully De’Ath Consultants 8350007 8363722 95= 91= Bailey Partnership 6 0 0 4 2 0 40 40 86 85 5 5 95= 91= MDA Consulting 6 0 0 4 2 0 57 55 127 124 9 14 95= 91= Barton Engineers 6060006 6172211 95= 91= Brinson Staniland Partnership 6003306 6131511 99= 97= WT Partnership 5 1 0 2 2 0 145 150 720 980 13 39 99= 97= Edmond Shipway 5 0 0 3 2 0 84 75 154 139 9 11 Key to all tables on page 79 Key BUILDING MAGAZINE 10.10.2008.
Recommended publications
  • Stephen Andrew Foster Education

    Stephen Andrew Foster Education

    Stephen Foster CV STEPHEN ANDREW FOSTER EDUCATION . BA (First class honours), Engineering, Trinity Hall, Cambridge (1976) . MA (Cantab) (1978) . CEng (1987) AFFILIATIONS . Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers . Member of the British Geotechnical Association Member of the Midland Geotechnical Society . EXPERIENCE 2002 – PRESENT - DIRECTOR - RAISON FOSTER ASSOCIATES Director of a small Geotechnical Consulting Engineer, providing specialist geotechnical advice and design to a range of clients within the construction industry. Principal Current Areas of Specialisation Pile and retaining wall design, slope stability, settlement analysis, earthworks and general geotechnical design. Projects include major transport infrastructure works, basement retaining walls and stability problems. Clients range from major consulting engineers to a variety of specialist contractors. Selected Projects Dover Harbour Berth No.6 replacement. Flint & Neill. Geotechnical assessment of the re-use of existing piled and offshore foundations for a replacement roll-on/roll-off ferry berth. A30 west approach to Beauharnois Bridge, Montreal, Canada. Arup. Embankment design for an earthworks element of a major highways project. Embankment design and construction governed by sensitive marine clays. Options included use of lightweight fill, toe berms and staged construction. London NW1 Euston Road, Unison HQ. May Gurney. Design of contiguous pile walls to a basement excavation in central London adjacent to highways, main services and existing structures. London NW1, Gloucester Avenue. Ramaza Properties. Design of a contiguous pile wall to allow a basement excavation adjacent to Camden Railway Sidings. Jersey, La Collette, Energy from Waste Plant. Amplus. Design of heavily loaded mini-piles on a reclaimed coastal site to support the structures for a new waste plant.
  • Smart Urban Spaces Optimising Design for Comfort, Safety and Economic Vitality

    Smart Urban Spaces Optimising Design for Comfort, Safety and Economic Vitality

    Smart Urban Spaces Optimising design for comfort, safety and economic vitality Urban planners often ponder over the ways in which people will move through their designs, interact with the environment and with each other, and how best to utilise the spaces provided. Buro Happold’s Smart Space team have proven track record in optimising design of urban spaces and masterplans to enhance Capacity expansion of Makkah during Hajj visitor experience. We understand the benefits obtained from efficient layouts, intuitive wayfinding, and effective operational management. Madinah masterplan, optimising building massing to maximise shading comfort Our consultants enable a better understanding of the impacts of designs. Through the forecasting of movement and activity patterns, tailored to the specific use, our pedestrian flow modelling informs design and management in order to optimise the use of urban spaces and enhance user experience. The resulting designs are therefore extensively tested with a minimised risk of undesirable and/or unsafe congestion. We help clients better understand existing activity patterns Cardiff city centre masterplan and/or visitor preferences. With a holistic look at pedestrian and Footfall analysis of St Giles Circus, London vehicular desire lines, we can formulate a strategy to encourage footfall through the new developments. Accurate modelling provides a basis on which to assess potential risks and implement counter measures to negative factors such as poor access, fear of crime, inadequate parking facilities and lack of signage. In addition, it allows us to optimise the placement of activities – for example, placing retail in areas where the most footfall is expected; identifying appropriate spaces to locate other social activities; etc.
  • Global Design Sprints: How to Reimagine Our Streets in an Era of Autonomous Vehicles

    Global Design Sprints: How to Reimagine Our Streets in an Era of Autonomous Vehicles

    GLOBAL DESIGN SPRINTS: HOW TO REIMAGINE OUR STREETS IN AN ERA OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES OUTCOMES FROM CITIES AROUND THE WORLD URBAN STREETS IN THE AGE OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES CONTENTS - 2017 - GLOBAL DESING SPRINT OUTCOMES 2 Global Design Sprints - 2017 URBAN STREETS IN THE AGE OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 1. INTRODUCTION Technological advancement for autonomous vehicles accelerated in 2015 Using this format, we hosted a series of global events to speculate and The following report is the result of this series of Global Design Sprints and, suddenly, everyone was talking about a future of autonomous and brainstorm the question of : – a collaboration of 138 sprinters from across the world. The executive connected vehicles. At BuroHappold, we wanted to understand what summary compares the different discussions and outcomes of the Sprints it might mean for our cities. How will our cities be impacted? Will there ‘HOW CAN URBAN STREETS BE RECLAIMED AND REIMAGINED and summarizes some of the key takeaways we collected. The ideas that be more or less traffic? Which ownership model for autonomous and THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF CONNECTED AND emerged range from transforming a residential neighbourhood from a car- connected vehicles will prevail? These are questions that many have asked, AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES?‘ zone to a care-zone to the introduction of the flexible use of a road bridge but no one can really answer today – even with the most sophisticated based on the demand from commuters, tourists, cyclists, and vehicular forecasting models. We cannot predict how people will respond to such a By bringing together people from the technology sector, the urban traffic.
  • Read the SPUR 2012-2013 Annual Report

    Read the SPUR 2012-2013 Annual Report

    2012–2013 Ideas and action Annual Report for a better city For the first time in history, the majority of the world’s population resides in cities. And by 2050, more than 75 percent of us will call cities home. SPUR works to make the major cities of the Bay Area as livable and sustainable as possible. Great urban places, like San Francisco’s Dolores Park playground, bring people together from all walks of life. 2 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 3 It will determine our access to economic opportunity, our impact on the planetary climate — and the climate’s impact on us. If we organize them the right way, cities can become the solution to the problems of our time. We are hard at work retrofitting our transportation infrastructure to support the needs of tomorrow. Shown here: the new Transbay Transit Center, now under construction. 4 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 5 Cities are places of collective action. They are where we invent new business ideas, new art forms and new movements for social change. Cities foster innovation of all kinds. Pictured here: SPUR and local partner groups conduct a day- long experiment to activate a key intersection in San Francisco’s Mid-Market neighborhood. 6 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 7 We have the resources, the diversity of perspectives and the civic values to pioneer a new model for the American city — one that moves toward carbon neutrality while embracing a shared prosperity.
  • Delivering Building Performance

    Delivering Building Performance

    MAY 2016 Full Report DELIVERING BUILDING PERFORMANCE With thanks to sponsors: © 2016 UK Green Building Council Registered charity number 1135153 Delivering Building Performance | 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Overcoming barriers to delivering building performance 9 Conclusion 28 C-Suite Headlines 30 References 32 Delivering Building Performance | 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT STEERING GROUP Project steering group: ■ Julian Sutherland, Cundall (formerly Atkins): Project Chair ■ Lynne Ceeney, Lytton Consulting: Project Manager on behalf of UK-GBC ■ Chris van Dronkelaar, BuroHappold/UCL: Project Researcher ■ Mark Allen, Saint Gobain ■ John Davies, Derwent London ■ Emma Hines, Tarmac ■ Judit Kimpian, AHR ■ Duncan Price, BuroHappold ■ Sarah Ratcliffe, Better Buildings Partnership UK-GBC is grateful to project sponsors, Buro Happold, Saint Gobain and Tarmac. INTERVIEWEES Interviewees were drawn from the following sectors: Investors, developers, owner occupiers, leasing occupiers, managing agents, facilities managers, professional services, manufacturers and membership organisations. We would like to specifically thank: ■ BRE (Andy Lewry) ■ Canary Wharf Group (Dave Hodge, Rita Margarido and Lugano Kapembwa) ■ The Crown Estate (Jane Wakiwaka) ■ Derwent London (John Davies) ■ Hoare Lea (Julie Godefroy) ■ IES (Sarah Graham and Naghman Khan) ■ John Lewis Partnership (Phil Birch) ■ Land Securities (Caroline Hill and Neil Pennell) ■ Legal and General (Debbie Hobbs) ■ Lend Lease (Hannah Kershaw) ■ Marks and Spencer (Kate Neale) ■ M J Mapp (Carl Brooks) ■ Tarmac (Tim Cowling) ■ UPP (James Sandie) ■ Wilkinson Eyre (Gary Clark) ■ Participants in the UK-GBC seminar at Ecobuild ■ Participants in the Edge seminar at Ecobuild Executive Summary Delivering Building Performance | 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The performance in operation, of the vast majority of our buildings, is simply not commensurate with the challenge of meeting our carbon targets.
  • The Big Name Commercial Lighting

    The Big Name Commercial Lighting

    Luc XVüiVICiW , .IUJNW lü i'H ., 1 9 4 0 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AT COAL SITE FI FOUNDE 18 7 Vol. CXXXVI. No. 3525 JUNE 15, 1945 9d. WEEKLY The Big Name i n Commercial Lighting [ ¡ ¿ t e a ^ LAMPS The British Thomson-Houston Co. Ltd. Crown House, Aldwych, London, W.C.2 ii E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w June 15, 1945 f I f N 1924 Bullers made the first big bushing of 6 6 kV capacity. To-day we are able to show this massive 242 kV OIL FILLED BUSHING. The porcelain parts were made in Bullers’ works for the BritishThomson- Houston Co. Ltd. It measures 15 ft. ij inches overall and is one of the largest bushings of this kind yet produced. Only the skill and knowledge acquired by long experience could produce insulators of such dimensions free from flaws. How much larger will be called for in years to come, only the future can say. But one thing is certain, whatever the size, Bullers will be ready with their unrivalled resources and experience to cope with the problem. Bullers ¡NSULATOKS AND /RONWOBK BULLERS, LTD. t h e h a l l , o a t l a n d s drive WEYBRIDGE, SURREY Telephone : Walton-cn-Thames 2451 Manchester Office : 196 Deansgate, Manchester June 15, 1945 E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w 1 IN SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF FOOD HERE IS ANOTHER RECIPE FOR YOUR DEMONSTRATIONS : Coated Cake Ingredients: COOKING CABINET 5 lb.
  • Where Do You Experience Both the Journey and the Destination?

    Where Do You Experience Both the Journey and the Destination?

    WHERE DO YOU EXPERIENCE BOTH THE JOURNEY AND THE DESTINATION? ANAHEIM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER SMARTER FASTER I NTEGRATED SOLUTIONS FOR CIVIC ARCHITECTURE VISION To catalyze transit-oriented growth, Orange County envisioned a world-class gateway linking regional transportation systems, providing convenient access to the area’s renowned destinations, and offering distinctive restaurants, shops and events. The iconic, LEED Platinum landmark embodies the region’s commitment to a vital, sustainable future. CHALLENGE As a modern multi-modal transportation hub designed to connect eight existing public and private transportation systems as well as future streetcar and high-speed rail lines, ARTIC involved extensive coordination of complex infrastructure. When combined with aggressive sustainability targets— including 30% reduction of both energy and water use—and the desire for a landmark design, the project demanded a fully integrated design solution to achieve project goals within budget tolerances. SOLUTION Taking a holistic design approach using BIM and advanced computational design and analysis tools allowed the design team to propose a complex catenary-shaped enclosure employing lightweight ETFE panels. In addition to optimizing the design for energy performance and constructability, the models facilitated cost estimating, construction sequencing, just-in-time ordering, and digital fabrication. VALUE The integrated solution leveraged the ETFE enclosure to address multiple goals. The translucent and insulating panels with varied frit patterns maximized daylight while reducing solar heat gain. Equally important, at just one-tenth the weight of glass, these lightweight panels required a less costly steel support structure. The modeling also enabled strategies for natural ventilation and water recycling that will reduce resource consumption and operating costs over time.
  • Driving Sustainability in New Homes: a Resource for Local Authorities VERSION 1.1: July 2018

    Driving Sustainability in New Homes: a Resource for Local Authorities VERSION 1.1: July 2018

    Driving sustainability in new homes: a resource for local authorities VERSION 1.1: July 2018 (Version 1.0 originally published March 2018) An output from the UKGBC Cities Programme, sponsored by: 1 Acknowledgements This resource is the output of a UKGBC project in association with The intention is that key stakeholders feel ‘co-ownership’ of this Core Cities UK. It has been produced through a combination of resource, and we are grateful to the organisations below for their workshops, meetings, written consultation and individual feedback. endorsement. We invite others to do likewise. A large number of organisations have taken time to feed into the For any queries in relation to this resource, contact process. A full list can be found on the following slide. However, John Alker, Director of Policy & Places, UKGBC: we are particularly grateful for the extensive time provided by [email protected] Charlene Clear, BRE and Duncan Price, BuroHappold. 2 Acknowledgements The following organisations provided input and/or review during the original process. This acknowledgement does not imply endorsement. Barratt Developments GLA Newcastle City Council Berkeley Group Greater Manchester Combined Authority PassivHaus Trust Bioregional Hoare Lea PRP BRE HTA Rockwool BuroHappold Hurstwyn Associates Saint Gobain Cambridge City Council Igloo Regeneration St Albans & District Council Clarion Housing Group JLL Sustainable Homes Climate KIC Lendlease UK100 Core Cities UK Levitt Bernstein Useful Projects Currie Brown Linkcity WSP Eastleigh Borough Council
  • Industry Joins Forces to Launch Built Environment Virtual Pavilion For

    Industry Joins Forces to Launch Built Environment Virtual Pavilion For

    Press Release Contact: Brooke Penman +44 (0)7794 903325 Industry joins forces to launch Built Environment Virtual Pavilion for COP26 The UK Green Building Council (UKGBC) has today announced a coalition of almost 100 partner organisations across the built environment sector who will support the delivery of a Built Environment Virtual Pavilion, ahead of the UN’s COP26 Climate Summit scheduled to take place in Glasgow this November. To enable maximum participation, regardless of the status of the physical Summit, UKGBC is acting as secretariat to a huge number of organisations who have joined forces to establish a smart virtual presence, which aims to give the sector a voice at COP26, and generate a reach and legacy that can stretch beyond COP itself. The Virtual Pavilion will comprise an exhibition of global exemplar projects and places, within a bespoke virtual reality (VR) space, as well as a major series of events and downloadable content – to include keynotes, panel discussions and more. Partners will shortly launch an open call for a creative and innovative virtual centrepiece for the Pavilion, with a detailed brief expected to be formally announced within the next few weeks. At least 30 ‘Delivery Partners’ are working together to support the initiative, consisting of non-profits, trade bodies, government agencies and professional institutions from across the built environment. Delivery Partners include: • Association for Consultancy and • Construction Scotland Innovation Centre Engineering (ACE) (CSIC) • Active Building Centre •
  • Gardiners Lane High Level Development Framework Concept Options

    Gardiners Lane High Level Development Framework Concept Options

    Basildon HLDFs Gardiners Lane Development Framework 31/10/2017 Pell Frischmann Gardiners Lane Development Framework 31/10/2017 High Level Development Frameworks REVISION RECORD Report Ref: A13304/VAA GARDINERS LANE HLDF Rev Description Date Originator Checked Approved 0 Draft Report 30/03/2017 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 1 Final Report 30/06/2017 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 2 Final Report REV A 13/10/2107 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 3 Final Report REV B 31/10/2107 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford This report is to be regarded as confidential to our Client and it is intended for their use only and may not be assigned. Consequently and in accordance with current practice, any liability to any third party in respect of the whole or any part of its contents is hereby expressly excluded. Before the report or any part of it is reproduced or referred to in any document, circular or statement and before its contents or the contents of any part of it are disclosed orally to any third party, our written approval as to the form and context of such a publication or disclosure must be obtained Prepared for: Prepared by: Basildon Borough Council Pell Frischmann The Basildon Centre 5 Manchester Square St. Martin’s Square London Basildon, Essex, SS14 1DL 1 Gardiners Lane Development Framework 31/10/2017 High Level Development Frameworks CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 4 1.2 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 GARDINERS LANE HLDF PURPOSE .............................................................. 5 2. PLANNING POLICY ................................................................................................... 7 2.1 GARDINERS LANE SOUTH PLANNING HISTORY .........................................
  • Cost Centre Account Expense Type Supplier Supplier Name Trans

    Cost Centre Account Expense Type Supplier Supplier Name Trans

    Cost Centre Account Expense Type Supplier Supplier Name Trans Payment Amount ID No Date excl vat Digital Skills 32751 Provider Delivery Fees- Grant 10006 The Development Manager Ltd 7005155 29/01/2021 29,700.00 Director of Policy, Strategy & Innovation 31770 Marketing 10018 The Jade Studio Ltd 7003425 06/01/2021 1,600.00 Director of Policy, Strategy & Innovation 31770 Marketing 10018 The Jade Studio Ltd 7003426 06/01/2021 825.00 Homelessness 31671 Revenue Contributions to Third Parties 10022 Trident Reach (the people charity) 7004211 06/01/2021 55,750.00 Bus Stations Operations 31511 Staff Uniforms 10024 Workwear Express 7004801 15/01/2021 1,635.34 Create Central Projects 31571 External Advice 10026 European Innovation 7004551 15/01/2021 3,333.00 Director of Housing & Regeneration 60561 Contributions to 3rd Parties 10037 Port Loop Phase 2 Limited 3000404 04/01/2021 149,864.40 Create Central Projects 31571 External Advice 10040 Vicky Jepson Media 7004579 13/01/2021 1,050.00 Create Central Projects 31571 External Advice 10040 Vicky Jepson Media 7005301 29/01/2021 1,750.00 Energy Capital 31571 External Advice 10046 Tin Smart Social Ltd 7003771 29/01/2021 35,750.00 Energy Capital 31571 External Advice 10046 Tin Smart Social Ltd 7004968 29/01/2021 28,125.00 Sustainable Travel 31761 Cycle Facility Costs 10049 Love to Ride 7004993 15/01/2021 30,000.00 TfWM/WMR Rail Team 31573 Legal Fees 10051 No5 Chambers Ltd 7005313 29/01/2021 5,783.34 Sprint 60615 Utilities Diversion 10058 Sunbelt Rentals Limited 7005198 27/01/2021 851.00 Sprint 60615 Utilities Diversion 10058 Sunbelt Rentals Limited 7005199 27/01/2021 777.00 Sprint 60615 Utilities Diversion 10058 Sunbelt Rentals Limited 7005200 27/01/2021 814.00 Sprint 60615 Utilities Diversion 10058 Sunbelt Rentals Limited 7005201 27/01/2021 814.00 Metro Programme Director 60111 Land Advice 10062 Golds Green Propety Co.
  • Rail Engineering Services PDF 812KB

    Rail Engineering Services PDF 812KB

    BRIEFING PACK TfL Professional Services Framework Rail Engineering Ref: PSF- 91310 Internal Use Only Rail Engineering Framework Briefing pack 1. Key Features..........................................................................................................4 2. Framework Sub Categories...............................................................................8 3. Framework Award by Supplier.........................................................................12 4. Framework Award by Sub Category ..............................................................15 5. Vendor Number & Outline Agreement............................................................17 6. Company & Account Manager Details............................................................20 7. Evaluation Criteria.................................................................................................22 Appendix A – Schedule 3 Framework Capability Statements.............................26 Appendix B – Grade Definitions...................................................................................46 Appendix C – Call Off Schedules . Schedule 6A Mini-Competition Request – Long Form..................56 . Schedule 6B Mini-Competition Request – Short Form: Services.......................................................................................................64 . Schedule 6C Mini-Competition Request – Short Form: Consultant Secondment ..............................................................................................70 . Schedule 7A Call