Chromium-6 in U.S. Tap Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chromium-6 in U.S. Tap Water Chromium-6 in U.S. Tap Water Rebecca Sutton, PhD EWG Senior Scientist http://www.ewg.org/chromium6-in-tap-water http://www.ewg.org/chromium6-in-tap-water Contents Background i. Executive Summary. 4 ii. Study Findings . 8 iii. Industry Tactics. .11 iv. Government Failings. .15 v. Progress in California. 17 vi. Methodology. .19 vii. References. 21 This PDF is QR Mobile Interactive Scan this QR code with your web and camera featured smart phone and be taken to the online report for Cancer Causing Chromium 6 in U.S. Tap Water. Download QR Reader for your Smartphone: www.i-nigma.mobi Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 2 Acknowledgments Principal Author: Rebecca Sutton, PhD Editors: Jane Houlihan, Renee Sharp & Nils Bruzelius Databases & Mapping: Chris Campbell & Sean Gray Web Design: Dean Clark This report was made possible by the support of the John Merck Fund, the Johnson Family Foundation, the Park Foundation and the Turner Foundation. EWG thanks Erin Brockovich and Bob Bowcock for their continued efforts to protect public health, and Max Costa (New York University School of Medicine) for his review of our report. Interns Jacob Booher, Marisa Evanouski, Samara Geller and Kimi Schell made significant contributions to this research. We also thank EWG contacts nationwide who made this study possible by volunteering to collect water samples for analysis. Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 3 http://www.ewg.org/chromium6-in-tap-water Executive Summary Tap water from 31 of 35 U.S. cities tested contains hexavalent chromium (or chromium-6), the carci- nogenic “Erin Brockovich chemical,” according to laboratory tests commissioned by Environmental Work- ing Group (EWG). The highest levels were detected in Norman, Okla.; Honolulu, Hawaii; and Riverside,i Calif. Despite mounting evidence of the contaminant’s toxic effects, including a U.S. Environmental Protec- tion Agency (EPA) draft toxicological review that classifies it as “likely to be carcinogenic to humans” when consumed in drinking water, the agency has not set a legal limit for chromium-6 in tap water and does not require water utilities to test for it. Hexavalent .02 chromium is commonly discharged from steel and .18 pulp mills as well as metal-plating and leather-tanning .15 facilities. It can also pollute water through erosion of soil and rock. .1 The National Toxicology Program has found that hexavalent chromium in drinking water shows clear evidence of carcinogenic activity in laboratory ani- .05 .06 mals, increasing the risk of otherwise rare gastrointes- tinal tumors (NTP 2007, 2008). In response to this Chromium-6 in tap water (parts per billion) .0 study and others, California officials last year proposed Average Proposed setting a public health goal for chromium-6 in drink- chromium-6 safe limit** level in EWG ing water of 0.06 parts per billion (ppb). This is the testing* first step toward establishing a statewide enforceable *Geometric average based on level of chromium-6 measured in 35 U.S. cities and a statistical estimate for the four cities limit (OEHHA 2009). where no chromium-6 was detected. The lowest level detect- able by these tests is 0.02 ppb. For the purpose of calculating Levels of the carcinogen in 25 cities tested by the nationwide average, the concentration of chromium-6 in EWG were higher than California’s proposed public these four cities was assumed to be 0.01 ppb, or half of the lowest detectable level. health goal. Tap water from Norman, Okla. (popula- **“Proposed safe limit” is California EPA’s proposed public tion 90,000) contained more than 200 times Califor- health goal (OEHHA 2009). nia’s proposed safe limit. Source: EWG-commissioned testing for hexavalent chromium in tap water from 35 cities. Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 4 Top Five Chromium-contaminated Cities Tested by EWG Hexavalent Chromium Contamination City City Population Level in Tap Water Norman, Oklahoma 89,952 12.9 ppb Honolulu, Hawaii 661,004 2.00 ppb Riverside, California 280,832 1.69 ppb Madison, Wisconsin 200,814 1.58 ppb San Jose, California 979,000 1.34 ppb Millions of Americans drink chromium-contaminated water EWG’s investigation is the broadest publicly available survey of hexavalent chromium to date. The 31 cities with chromium-polluted tap water draw from utilities that collectively serve more than 26 million people. In California, the only state that requires testing for hexavalent chromium, water utilities have de- tected the compound in tap water supplied to more than 31 million people, according to an EWG analysis of data from the state water agency (EWG 2009). EWG’s tests provide a one-time snapshot of chromium-6 levels in 35 cities. But chromium pollution is a continuous, ongoing problem, as shown by the annual water quality reports that utilities must produce under federal law. Over the years, nearly all of the 35 cities tested by EWG regularly report finding chromium (in the form of total chromium) in their water despite using far less sensitive testing methods than those used by EWG. The total number of Americans drinking tap water contaminated with this compound is likely far higher than is indicated by EWG’s tests. At least 74 million people in nearly 7,000 communities drink tap water polluted with “total chromium,” which includes hexavalent and other forms of the metal, according to EWG’s 2009 analysis of water utility tests from 48,000 communities in 42 states (EWG 2009). The EPA has set a legal limit in tap water for total chromium of 100 ppb to protect against “allergic dermatitis” (skin irritation or reactions). Measures of total chromium include the essential mineral trivalent chromium, which regulates glucose metabolism, as well as the cancer-causing hexavalent form. Preliminary EWG-commissioned water tests found that in most cases, the majority of the total chromium in water was in the hexavalent form, yet the EPA’s legal limit for total chromium is 1,700 times higher than California’s proposed public health goal for hexavalent chromium. This disparity could indicate significant cancer risk for communities drinking chromium-tainted tap water. Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 5 http://www.ewg.org/chromium6-in-tap-water The EPA’s new analysis of hexavalent chromium toxicity, released in draft form in September 2010 (EPA 2010a), cites significant cancer concerns linked to exposure to the contaminant in drinking water. It high- lights health effects documented in animal studies, including anemia and damage to the gastrointestinal tract, lymph nodes and liver. Industry deception delayed protections The plight of the cancer-stricken residents of Hinkley, Calif., who in 1996 won a $333 million settle- ment from Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for contaminating their tap water with hexavalent chromium, was the basis of the 2000 movie “Erin Brockovich,” starring Julia Roberts. Subsequently, a 2005 Wall Street Journal investigation and a separate EWG report based on court docu- ments and depositions from a similar lawsuit in Kettleman City, Calif. revealed that PG&E had hired consultants to publish a fraudulent analysis of cancer mortality in Chinese villagers exposed to hexavalent chromium, in an attempt to disprove the link between the chemical and cancer. The study was published in the respected Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and scientists and regulators — in- cluding the EPA — cited the fraudulent article in research and safety assessments. The journal retracted the paper in 2006 in response to EWG’s request for corrective action. California officials then conducted a rigorous re-assessment of the study data, finding a statistically sig- nificant increase in stomach cancer among the exposed. Their analysis is consistent with laboratory evidence from the National Toxicology Program and others showing that hexavalent chromium in tap water causes gastrointestinal tumors in multiple species. Industry has sought for more than six years to delay state-mandated regulation of hexavalent chromium in tap water in California. Aerospace giant Honeywell International Inc. and others have stalled the adop- tion of the advisory public health goal by pressing for additional external scientific peer review. California’s Department of Public Health can neither set nor enforce a mandatory tap water standard for hexavalent chromium until the goal is finalized. Recommendations At least 74 million Americans in 42 states drink chromium-polluted tap water, much of it likely in the form of cancer-causing hexavalent chromium. Given the scope of exposure and the magnitude of the po- tential risk, the EPA should move expeditiously to establish a legal limit for the chemical in tap water and require water utilities to test for it. Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 6 The state of California must establish a strong standard for hexavalent chromium in tap water immedi- ately. A truly health-protective hexavalent chromium regulation will reduce the cancer risk for Californians and serve as a model for the nation. With an enforceable standard already six years past the statutory dead- line and the health of millions of Californians at stake, the state cannot move too quickly. Chromium-6 Is Widespread in US Tap Water: Environmental Working Group 7 http://www.ewg.org/chromium6-in-tap-water Study Findings Carcinogenic Erin Brockovich Chemical Found in Tap Water Across the U.S. Tests commissioned by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) detected carcinogenicii hexavalent chromium in 31 of 35 tap water samples — 89 percent — collected in cities across the country. EWG targeted a mix of large cities and some smaller ones where testing by local water utilities had previously de- tected potentially significant amounts of “total chromium.” This less specific measurement includes trivalent chromium, an essential mineral that regulates glucose metabolism, as well the cancer-causing hexavalent form, also called chromium-6.
Recommended publications
  • Cleanlaw 50: Caitlin Mccoy Speaks with Erin Brockovich About Her New Book Superman’S Not Coming and Community Empowerment in Environmental Crises, October 28, 2020
    CleanLaw 50: Caitlin McCoy Speaks with Erin Brockovich About Her New Book Superman’s Not Coming and Community Empowerment in Environmental Crises, October 28, 2020 To return to our website click here. Caitlin McCoy: Hello and welcome to another episode of CleanLaw, our podcast at the Environmental and Energy Law Program at Harvard Law School. This is Caitlin McCoy and I'm a staff attorney at the program. Today, I have the incredible privilege of speaking with Erin Brockovich, who hardly needs an introduction since her name has become synonymous with efforts to clean up contaminated water supplies hold polluters accountable and establish common sense protections for water quality. Welcome Erin. We're honored to have you as a guest on the podcast. Erin Brockovich: Hi. It's nice to be here today. Thanks for the invite and I'm just as honored to be here. Caitlin: That's really flattering. Thank you. You've written a new book that I just finished reading. It's called Superman's Not Coming: Our National Water Crisis and What We the People Can Do about It. First of all, congratulations on a fantastic book. Erin: Thank you. I hope you enjoyed it. Caitlin: I really did. When I first got it, I thought wow this is pretty long, but it's worth every page because it's one of the best explainers on water quality that I've read. You break down the laws, the standards, major water quality issues facing the country and throughout the entire book, you're weaving in really moving stories of people who decide to take a stand for clean water in their communities and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin Brockovich 1
    Joy Feeney Topics in Political Economy Professor David Ruccio December 17, 2008 The Economic Cost of Prevention Modern economic theory seems to disregard many practices necessary for the implementation of such theory. The 2000 hit movie Erin Brockovich tells the story of the missing pieces of economic theory throughout the battle of the underdog. The movie itself begs the question what is the truth? Truths are hard to come by and with a malfunctioning economic system, even more of a challenge. Brockovich depicts two sides of the economic argument, each showing and disproving economic practices left in and out of the current system. Brockovich utilizes the juxtaposition of the good-guy-bad-guy story in order to shed light on themes of corporate greed, virtuous values, and the strength of numbers in unity. Throughout the film, these themes are tried and tested, creating an alternative economic story to the current economic perspective thrust upon the film and society. Based on the true story of Erin Brockovich-Ellis, the film targets utility bigwig Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) based in San Francisco, California for lying to residents of Hinckley California about unhealthy amounts of hexavalent chromium in groundwater. The chromium was used to prevent corrosion in water towers on the Hinckley campus of PG&E since the 1950s. The chromium-laced wastewater was then released to unlined retention ponds that infiltrated the ground water of residents in the Hinckley area. This hexavalent chromium, also known as chromium 6, is known to cause medical problems such as uterine cancer, spinal deterioration, and Hodgkin’s disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Hexavalent Chromium Hexavalent
    Toxic Heavy Metals Series Toxic Heavy Metals Hexavalent ChromiumHexavalent This document will familiarize the reader with the toxic metal Hexavalent Chromium, OSHA standards, and methods for prevention and decontamination. Hygenall Corporation 6275 University Drive, STE 37-390 Huntsville, AL 35806 256.781.4486 [email protected] Toxic Metal Series Hexavalent Chromium Contents Introduction . 3 Worker Exposure and Health Consequences . 4 OSHA’s Hexavalent Chromium Standards . 4 Exposure Limits . 4 Exposure Monitoring and Determinations . 4 Scheduled Monitoring Option . 5 Regulated Areas . 6 Control Measures . 7 Requirements for Protective Work Clothing and Equipment . 8 Hygiene Areas and Practices . 9 Housekeeping . 10 Recommended Cleaning and Decontamination Products…11 Medical Surveillance . 12 Worker Training and Communication . 13 Recordkeeping . 14 Effective Dates . 14 Additional Information . 15 References . 16 2 | P a g e Hexavalent Chromium Toxic Metal Series INTRODUCTION This document is intended to give readers an overview of the provisions and requirements of the OSHA Hexavalent Chromium standards for general industry (29 CFR 1910.1026), shipyards (29 CFR 1915.1026), and construction (29 CFR 1926.1126). Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is a toxic form of the element chromium. Hexavalent chromium is rarely found in nature and is generally man-made. Cr(VI) is widely used in pigments, metal finishing electroplating), wood preservatives and fungicides, and in chemical synthesis as an ingredient and catalyst. Table 1 lists some selected Cr(VI) compounds with their synonyms and common uses. Hexavalent chromium may also be present in fumes generated during the production or welding of chrome alloys. Chromium metal is often alloyed with other metals or plated on metal and plastic substrates to improve corrosion resistance and provide protective coatings.
    [Show full text]
  • Watertech 2015
    An Information Service for Alberta’s Environment Industry The Week Ending February 27th, 2015 U WaterTech 2015 - 40 Delegate Spots Remaining Inside this Issue: April 20-22, 2015 Alberta Waste Control Delta Lodge at Kananaskis Regulation Review and Update With the smaller venue for 2015, there are now only 40 spots remaining for WaterTech Environmental 2015. Have you registered? Protection Order Issued to Leduc County AEMERA Appoints April 20-22, 2015 Science Advisory Delta Lodge at Kananaskis Panel New CCME ESAA is pleased to announce that the program for WaterTech 2015 is now available Document online: www.esaa.org/watertech. The 2015 program includes 53 technical presentations New Member that include Upcoming Events and much more …. Special Oil Sands Session U 12 other technical sessions focusing on Pipelines, Wetlands, Groundwater, Municipal, Water Management, Modelling, Wastewater, and more. The ESAA Weekly WaterTech 2015 will also feature three keynote presentations: News is published weekly by: Opening Keynote Environmental Services Association of Alberta "Hydroclimatic Change" 102, 2528 Ellwood Drive SW Robert Sandford Edmonton, AB T6X 0A9 Director of the Western Watersheds Research Collaborative, and an associate of the (P) 780.429.6363 Centre for Hydrology at the University of Saskatchewan (F) 780.429.4249 [email protected] UTTTH T www.esaHTTTU Tuesday Lunch Keynote a.org UTTH T Bob McDonald Comments & submissions Host of CBC's Quirks and Quarks are welcome! Please submit your Wednesday Lunch Keynote announcement via e-mail to: Philippe Cousteau [email protected] UTTTH T Co-Founder and President, EarthEcho International ...environmental integrity through Sponsorship Opportunities: A limited number of sponsorship opportunities are still innovative available.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromium Compounds Hazard Summary
    Chromium Compounds Hazard Summary Chromium occurs in the environment primarily in two valence states, trivalent chromium (Cr III) and hexavalent chromium (Cr VI). Exposure may occur from natural or industrial sources of chromium. Chromium III is much less toxic than chromium (VI). The respiratory tract is also the major target organ for chromium (III) toxicity, similar to chromium (VI). Chromium (III) is an essential element in humans. The body can detoxify some amount of chromium (VI) to chromium (III). The respiratory tract is the major target organ for chromium (VI) toxicity, for acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) inhalation exposures. Shortness of breath, coughing, and wheezing were reported from a case of acute exposure to chromium (VI), while perforations and ulcerations of the septum, bronchitis, decreased pulmonary function, pneumonia, and other respiratory effects have been noted from chronic exposure. Human studies have clearly established that inhaled chromium (VI) is a human carcinogen, resulting in an increased risk of lung cancer. Animal studies have shown chromium (VI) to cause lung tumors via inhalation exposure. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (7), which contains information on inhalation chronic toxicity and the RfC and oral chronic toxicity and the RfD, and the carcinogenic effects of chromium including the unit cancer risk for inhalation exposure, EPA's Toxicological Review of Trivalent Chromium and Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium (3), and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR's) Toxicological Profile for Chromium. (1) Uses The metal chromium is used mainly for making steel and other alloys.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Reuse and Waste Minimization of Hexavalent Chrome
    Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Technologies Research and Development Office Science and Technology Program Final Report ST-2018-9085-01 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Research and Development Office 10/1/2018 Mission Statements Protecting America's Great Outdoors and Powering Our Future The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The following form is a Standard form 298, Report Documentation Page. This report was sponsored by the Bureau of Reclamations Research and Development office. For more detailed information about this Report documentation page please contact Miguel Arias-Paic at 303-445-2131. THIS TEXT WILL BE INVISIBLE. IT IS FOR 508 COMPLIANCE OF THE NEXT PAGE. Disclaimer Information in this report may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. The data and findings should not be construed as an endorsement of any product or firm by the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Interior, or Federal Government. The products evaluated in the report were evaluated for purposes specific to the Bureau of Reclamation mission. Reclamation gives no warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, for the products evaluated in this report, including merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 T1. REPORT DATE: T2. REPORT TYPE: T3. DATES COVERED SEPTEMBER 2018 RESEARCH T4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Technologies Z1759, X9085, FA280 5b.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Lotter, MS, CIH
    Jason Lotter, MS, CIH Current Position Summary of Experience Supervising Health Mr. Jason Lotter is a Supervising Health Scientist with Cardno ChemRisk in Chicago. His Scientist principal areas of training and expertise include industrial hygiene, exposure and risk assessment, and occupational safety. He has been involved in researching, measuring, Discipline Areas and reconstructing exposures, and assessing risks to consumers, residents, and workers, > Industrial Hygiene from a variety of chemicals including formaldehyde, silica, diacetyl, coal dust, lead, > Exposure particulate matter, hexavalent chromium, asbestos, and metals. Mr. Lotter completed his Assessment master’s degree in Public Health Science, with an emphasis in industrial hygiene, from > Risk Assessment the University of Illinois at Chicago. For his master’s thesis, he evaluated groundwater > Occupational Safety arsenic in Guatemala and conducted a risk assessment related to arsenic exposure for local residents. Years' Experience 7 Years At ChemRisk, Mr. Lotter has conducted independent research on various topics and chemicals, and has presented his research at scientific conferences and published in the Joined Cardno peer-reviewed literature. He has also conducted indoor air modeling for formaldehyde, 2013 provided industrial hygiene and occupational safety support during refinery turnarounds, and has assisted in the completion of various exposure simulation studies. Education > MS, Public Health Mr. Lotter currently co-leads the Cardno ChemRisk Cleaning and Disinfectant Product Science, University initiative, focusing on peracetic acid and other antimicrobial chemicals. He is a member of of Illinois at Chicago, the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and currently serves on the Board of 2012 Directors of the Chicago Local Section of AIHA. He has been as a Certified Industrial > BS, Civil Hygienist (CIH) since 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013
    Prepared in cooperation with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013 Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover and other images: Front cover shows collection of groundwater samples, Union-York Water District (intake 00251). This and other photography by Patrick Mills, U.S. Geological Survey. Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013 By Patrick C. Mills and Richard P. Cobb Prepared in cooperation with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Level Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Options: Bench-Scale Evaluation
    Tailored Collaboration Low-Level Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Options: Bench-Scale Evaluation Subject Area: High-Quality Water Low-Level Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Options: Bench-Scale Evaluation ©2004 AwwaRF. All rights reserved. About the Awwa Research Foundation The Awwa Research Foundation (AwwaRF) is a member-supported, international, nonprofit organization that sponsors research to enable water utilities, public health agencies, and other professionals to provide safe and affordable drinking water to consumers. The Foundation's mission is to advance the science of water to improve the quality of life. To achieve this mission, the Foundation sponsors studies on all aspects of drinking water, including supply and resources, treatment, monitoring and analysis, distribution, management, and health effects. Funding for research is provided primarily by subscription payments from approximately 1,000 utilities, consulting firms, and manufacturers in North America and abroad. Additional funding comes from collaborative partnerships with other national and international organizations, allowing for resources to be leveraged, expertise to be shared, and broad-based knowledge to be developed and disseminated. Government funding serves as a third source of research dollars. From its headquarters in Denver, Colorado, the Foundation's staff directs and supports the efforts of more than 800 volunteers who serve on the board of trustees and various committees. These volunteers represent many facets of the water industry, and contribute their expertise to select and monitor research studies that benefit the entire drinking water community. The results of research are disseminated through a number of channels, including reports, the Web site, conferences, and periodicals. For subscribers, the Foundation serves as a cooperative program in which water suppliers unite to pool their resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin Brockovich By: Kurt Schwoerer, Brian Jackson, Ryan Carroll, James Borowski, and Jake Guertin Background
    Erin Brockovich By: Kurt Schwoerer, Brian Jackson, Ryan Carroll, James Borowski, and Jake Guertin Background ● Born ○ June 22, 1960 Lawrence, Kansas ● Education ○ High School: Lawrence High School ■ Lawrence, Kansas ○ College ■ Kansas State (Manhattan, Kansas) ■ Wade College (Dallas, Texas) ● Associates degree in applied arts ● Social ○ Married ■ Shawn Brown ■ Steve Brockovich ■ Eric Ellis Wikipedia ○ 3 Children Professional Career Or Lack Thereof ● Moves out west ○ Management Trainee ○ Beauty pageant in 1981 ■ Wins Miss Pacific Coast ● Brokerage Firm, Reno Nevada ○ Car Accident ● Masry & Vititoe ○ Injury Settlement ○ Clerical Position Twitter Hinkley California - Considered an unincorporated community - Located in the Mojave Desert, in San Bernardino California - Population currently at 1,915 people - Considered a ghost town now due to the hexavalent chromium that contaminated their groundwater supply. Google PG&E and Hinkley, California ● Investigation of Hinkley ○ Found blood samples in a case involving PG&E and spiked curiosity ● PG&E ○ Big name gas and electric company supplying energy to the west coast ● PG&E used the area around Hinkley to dispose of wastewater ○ Ponds where PG&E were dumping wastewater were unlined. ○ Over the years between 1952 to 1966 approximately 370 million gallons of wastewater that had been contaminated with hexavalent chromium were dumped into these ponds. ○ This caused the groundwater in Hinkley, California and surrounding areas to become contaminated and unsafe for human consumption. ○ PG&E didn’t inform the residence until 1987 PBS Hexavalent Chromium ● Any type of chemical that contains chromium in the +6 valence state (CrVI)usually produced through an industrial process. ● Typically used in alloy steel to increase hardenability and resistance to corrosion or found in dyes and paints.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Discharge Requirements for Pacific Gas and Electric Company Groundwater Remediation Project
    CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LAHONTAN REGION BOARD ORDER NO. R6V-2014-0023 WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PROJECT AGRICULTURAL TREATMENT UNITS WDID NO. 6B361403002 _________________________San Bernardino County______________________ The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region (Water Board), finds: 1. Discharger Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is the owner and operator of the natural gas compressor station in Hinkley where hexavalent chromium was discharged from historical waste water releases to groundwater. For the purposes of this Order, PG&E is referred to as the “Discharger.” This Water Board Order (Order) supersedes and rescinds the previous Order No. R6V-2004-0034 and amendments, and Investigative Order R6V-2011-0078. 2. Groundwater Contamination The compressor station began operating in 1952 and discharged untreated cooling tower water containing hexavalent chromium to unlined ponds until 1964. Wastewater then percolated through soil to the water table, approximately 80 feet below, creating a chromium plume in groundwater. Since 1991, PG&E has implemented various interim remediation projects to clean up chromium in groundwater at different locations within and outside of the plume boundaries. In August 2010, PG&E submitted a Feasibility Study in compliance with Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) R6V-2008-0002, evaluating options for comprehensive (Project Area-wide) cleanup of groundwater to background concentrations of chromium. -1- Order No. R6V-2014-0023 3. Project Area and Operable Units The Project Area regulated under this Order is approximately 50 square miles (32,159 acres) in size and includes all areas within the chromium plume boundaries containing more than the maximum background levels of 3.1 micrograms per liter (µg/L) hexavalent chromium or 3.2 µg/L total chromium (based on the Discharger's fourth quarter 2012 groundwater monitoring report) and approximately 1 mile beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) in Drinking Water
    PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS FOR CHEMICALS IN DRINKING WATER HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM (Cr VI) July 2011 Governor of the State of California Edmund G. Brown Jr. Acting Secretary for Environmental Protection California Environmental Protection Agency Linda S. Adams Acting Director Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment George V. Alexeeff, Ph.D. Public Health Goal for Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) in Drinking Water Prepared by Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Branch Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency July 2011 PREFACE Drinking Water Public Health Goals Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Branch Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency This Public Health Goal (PHG) technical support document provides information on health effects from contaminants in drinking water. PHGs are developed for chemical contaminants based on the best available toxicological data in the scientific literature. These documents and the analyses contained in them provide estimates of the levels of contaminants in drinking water that would pose no significant health risk to individuals consuming the water on a daily basis over a lifetime. The California Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996 (Health and Safety Code, Section 116365) requires the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to perform risk assessments and adopt PHGs for contaminants in drinking water based exclusively on public health considerations. The Act requires that PHGs be set in accordance with the following criteria: 1. PHGs for acutely toxic substances shall be set at levels at which no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, with an adequate margin of safety. 2. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances that may cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects and shall be set at levels that OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health.
    [Show full text]