Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes

The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) was held on March 12, 2019, at the Las Vegas Convention Center, 3150 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109. This meeting was properly noticed and posted in compliance with the Nevada Open Meeting Law.

Board of Directors Present unless otherwise noted

Commissioner Larry Brown, Chair Mr. Tom Jenkin Mr. Bill Noonan, Vice Chair Mr. Gregory Lee……………………………..absent Mayor Pro Tem Peggy Leavitt, Secretary Councilman John Marz Mr. Chuck Bowling, Treasurer Councilman George Rapson….……via telephone Councilwoman Michele Fiore Ms. Mary Beth Sewald…...... ……via telephone Mayor Carolyn Goodman Ms. Marilyn Spiegel Mayor Pro Tem Pamela Goynes-Brown Commissioner Lawrence Weekly

Steve Hill, CEO/President Luke Puschnig, Esq., CEM, Legal Counsel Ed Finger, Chief Financial Officer LVCVA Executive Staff in Attendance Cathy Tull, Chief Marketing Officer Brian Yost, Chief Operating Officer Barbara Bolender, Chief People Officer Terry Jicinsky, Senior Vice President of Operations

OPENING CEREMONIES – CALL TO ORDER

Chairman Larry Brown called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

INVOCATION The invocation was delivered by Father Ron Zanoni of St. James the Apostle Roman Catholic Church. FLAG SALUTE The Pledge of Allegiance followed the invocation.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR BY THE PUBLIC

Aleta Dupree commented on the importance of Item 9, and provided history on underground transportation systems.

Ken Evans, President of the Urban Chamber of Commerce expressed appreciation for the Urban Chamber of Commerce being given the opportunity to participate in the recent NASCAR Weekend. Mr. Evans provided a summary of the activities conducted during that weekend, and provided information on charitable causes that benefitted from the event.

Chair Larry Brown reminded the public to keep their comments to the posted agenda items.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 2 of 13

Ed Uehling expressed his excitement for Agenda Item 9, provided cost information pertaining to the light rail system, commented on additional information not included in the February 12, 2019, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors minutes regarding travel and the LVCVA’s past influence on tourism, and commented on a Rugby event that will not be returning to Las Vegas.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES

APPROVAL OF Vice Chair Bill Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting THE AGENDA members present, to approve the March 12, 2019, Regular Meeting of the Board of AND MINUTES Directors’ agenda, and the February 12, 2019, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors’ minutes.

Member George Rapson, via telephone, expressed that he was having a hard time hearing.

PRESENTATIONS – DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION

Presentations by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Staff Terry Jicinsky, Senior Vice President of Operations, delivered a video presentation on the Las Vegas Convention Center District (LVCCD) expansion including highlights on meeting rooms, concrete reinforcements, exhibit hall, completion status, and number of workers on the project.

Barbara Bolender, Chief People Officer, recognized LVCVA Senior Director of Global Development Rafael Villanueva, for being named Tourism Summit Person of the Year at the North American Journeys Receptive Tour Operators Tourism Summit, and recognized Ray Suppe, LVCVA Vice President of Customer Safety, for his appointment on the Board of Directors for the Exhibition and Services Contractor Association.

Brian Yost, Chief Operating Officer, delivered a video presentation on the following operations highlights: • International Wireless Communications Expo – March 4-7 • International Pizza Expo – March 4-7 • Associated Surplus Dealers (ASD) Market Week – March 17-20 • Nightclub & Bar Show – March 25-27

Cathy Tull, Chief Marketing Officer, delivered a video presentation on the following marketing highlights: • Green lighting of the Las Vegas Welcome Sign – March 14 • Vegas Uncork’d – May 9-12

• Marketing Initiatives - Airline Developments: o Routes Americas Conference – Winner of Best Destination Marketing Award o American Airlines’ recent announcement of their application for operation of nonstop service from Tokyo - Public Relations Efforts o Series of stories in USA Today o LA Times story on Country Music A-listers booking shows in Laughlin

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 3 of 13

Mr. Hill recognized the success of Ultimate Sports Weekend, thanked Lisa Motley, LVCVA Director of Sports Marketing and Special Events, and thanked Jackie Dennis, LVCVA Director of Communications, for her assistance in communications efforts with recent news surrounding the LVCVA.

This was an information item and did not require Board action.

STAFF REPORTS – DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION

MARKETING DIVISION

ITEM 1. American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) Annual Meeting & Exposition – Columbus, OH – August 10-13, 2019 Ms. Tull requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of an estimated expenditure of $149,100 for expenses associated with the LVCVA participating in the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) Annual Meeting & Exposition, August 10-13, 2019, in Columbus, OH; 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorizing any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Fiscal Impact FY 2020 $149,100 Estimated expenditure

Treasurer Chuck Bowling disclosed that Mandalay Bay will be hosting a lunch in relation to the 2020 ASAE show.

Treasurer Bowling moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member George Rapson and Member Mary Beth Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Approve an estimated expenditure of $149,100 for expenses associated with the LVCVA participating in the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) Annual Meeting & Exposition, August 10-13, 2019, in Columbus, OH; 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorize any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

ITEM 2. Corporate Event Marketing Association (CEMA) Summit Networking Event – Las Vegas, NV – July 22, 2019 Ms. Tull requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of an estimated expenditure of $167,000 for expenses associated with the LVCVA sponsoring the Corporate Event Marketing Association (CEMA) Summit Networking Event, July 22, 2019; 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorizing any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Fiscal Impact FY 2020 $167,000 Estimated expenditure

Treasurer Bowling moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Approve of an estimated expenditure of $167,000 for expenses associated with the LVCVA sponsoring the Corporate Event Marketing Association (CEMA) Summit Networking Event, July 22, 2019; 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorize any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 4 of 13

ITEM 3. IMEX America – Las Vegas, Nevada – September 10-12, 2019 Ms. Tull requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of an estimated expenditure of $415,700 for expenses associated with the LVCVA participating in the IMEX America trade show, September 10-12, 2019, in Las Vegas, NV; 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorizing any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Fiscal Impact FY 2020 $415,700 Estimated expenditure

Vice Chair Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson via telephone, to: 1) Approve an estimated expenditure of $415,700 for expenses associated with the LVCVA participating in the IMEX America trade show, September 10-12, 2019, in Las Vegas, NV; 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorize any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

ITEM 4. LVCVA.com Website Redesign Ms. Tull requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of an estimated expenditure of $290,000 for the LVCVA.com website redesign and; 2) Authorizing any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Fiscal Impact FY 2019 $162,000 Estimated expenditure FY 2020 $128,000 Estimated expenditure

Member Carolyn Goodman asked if this was part of the contract or if there was a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the redesign, to which Ms. Tull answered the creative piece is part of R&R’s contract, the High Lantern retainer will be used for a large portion of the Corporate Communication piece along with additional funds requested in this agenda item, and the work with Simpleview is in addition to their current work with the LVCVA on the back end of the websites.

Member Goodman asked at what point might an RFP be considered for major website design changes, to which Ms. Tull said there is no considered RFP time as many of the LVCVA’s websites have recently been redesigned.

Treasurer Bowling asked Member John Marz if he was still Chair of the Marketing Committee, to which Member Marz replied yes. Treasurer Bowling suggested collaborating with a focus group of resort partners for creating efficiency and alignment in promoting Las Vegas.

Treasurer Bowling moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Approve of an estimated expenditure of $290,000 for the LVCVA.com website redesign and; 2) Authorize any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available general funds.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 5 of 13

ITEM 5. Las Vegas Events – Event Approvals – NASCAR RaceJam Weekend, March 2, 2019; Downtown Rocks Concert Series, May-October 2019 That the Board of Directors consider approval of the distribution of funds to Las Vegas Events (LVE) in the amount of $265,000 to sponsor two events that will be held at the Fremont Street Experience in Downtown Las Vegas: • NASCAR RaceJam Weekend, March 2, 2019 - $105,000 • Downtown Rocks Concert Series, May-October, 2019 - $160,000

Fiscal Impact FY 2019 $265,000 Estimated expenditure

Vice Chair Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to approve the distribution of funds to Las Vegas Events (LVE) in the amount of $265,000 to sponsor two events that will be held at the Fremont Street Experience in Downtown Las Vegas: NASCAR RaceJam Weekend, March 2, 2019 - $105,000; and Downtown Rocks Concert Series, May-October, 2019 - $160,000

OPERATIONS DIVISION

ITEM 6. Cox Nevada Telcom, LLC Addendum to Telecommunications Provider License Contract #4116 Mr. Yost requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of a three (3) year extension for Cox Nevada Telcom, LLC (Cox), to continue serving as the LVCVA’s official and exclusive telecommunications provider for the period of September 28, 2020 through September 28, 2023; and 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents.

Fiscal Impact Projected annual revenue to LVCVA of $5,500,000

During term of the extension, Cox commits to a total investment of $10M, to include: • $4.6M investment for replacement of existing wifi access points. • $3.4M investment in the LVCCD expansion facility for wireless network service equipment. • $2M one-time contribution by provider to the technology fund for forward looking technology investment across the campus.

Vice Chair Noonan congratulated staff for the negotiation of the extension.

Member Sewald, via telephone, disclosed that leadership from Cox sits on the Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce Board of Trustees, and for that reason, she will be abstaining from the vote.

Treasurer Bowling commented on the 2013 Board of Directors decision to change telecommunications, congratulated the Cox team, and emphasized the importance of wifi and connectivity in hosting conferences.

Treasurer Bowling moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson via telephone, and with the exception of Member Sewald who abstained, to: 1) Approve a three (3) year extension for Cox Nevada Telcom, LLC (Cox), to continue serving as the LVCVA’s official and exclusive telecommunications provider for the period of September 28, 2020 through September 28, 2023; and 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 6 of 13

ITEM 7. South Hall Roof Recoating, Bid #19-4560 Mr. Yost requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approval of Bid #19-4560, South Hall Roof Recoating to Commercial Roofers Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada, in the estimated amount of $437,800; 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorizing any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available capital funds.

Fiscal Impact FY 2019 $437,800 Estimated expenditure

Vice Chair Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Approve Bid #19-4560, South Hall Roof Recoating to Commercial Roofers Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada, in the estimated amount of $437,800; 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to execute the contract documents; and 3) Authorize any residual unexpended balances from this authorization to revert to available capital funds.

GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION

ITEM 8. Authorization to Negotiate and Execute Sales Listing Agreement Mr. Hill requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to negotiate and execute a sales listing agreement with CBRE Inc. (CBRE), for the potential sale of approximately ten (10) acres of LVCVA land along Las Vegas Boulevard.

Fiscal Impact The commission structure will be commission-based if the land sale is 7.5 acres or greater, with a one-percent (1%) commission up to a certain per-acreage value, and a higher percentage (up to 5%) if higher per-acreage values are reached. If the sale is smaller than 7.5 acres, the commission will be one and one-half percent (1.5%).

Chair Brown asked for clarification that any proposed sale will be subject to future Board of Director approval, to which Luke Puschnig, Legal Counsel responded the Board of Directors isn’t committing anything other than the possibility that there is going to be a sale.

Member Michele Fiore asked if Mr. Puschnig’s confirmation goes for a land swap deal as well, to which Mr. Hill responded any land swap agreement would go to the Board of Directors, but the possibility of a land swap is not anticipated in this transaction.

Vice Chair Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to negotiate and execute a sales listing agreement with CBRE Inc. (CBRE), for the potential sale of approximately ten (10) acres of LVCVA land along Las Vegas Boulevard.

ITEM 9. RFP #19-4570 Las Vegas Convention Center District Campus Wide People Mover Recommendation Mr. Hill provided a PowerPoint and video presentation, and requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Awarding RFP #19-4570, Las Vegas Convention Center District Campus Wide People Mover, to The Boring Company; and 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to negotiate a design, construction, and operations agreement with The Boring Company.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 7 of 13

Mr. Hill introduced Steve Davis, President of The Boring Company. Mr. Davis expressed his excitement to be a part of the LVCVA’s expansion project and The Boring Company’s interest in transportation infrastructure in the Las Vegas community, described the benefits of underground expansion versus above-ground expansion including road closures, convenience to delegates, and weather. Mr. Davis introduced The Boring Company’s members that were present at the meeting.

Member Goodman commented on the lack of communication regarding the enormity and significance of the project, and expressed concerns about the proposed contract between the LVCVA and The Boring Company for underground transportation services. Goodman emphasized the importance of the transport of conventioneers be handled safely and efficiently using best practices, expressed her anticipation of options and documented success stories for consideration, and questioned the issuance of the RFP, the selection of a recipient without full briefings to all members of the Board of Directors, and the transparency of the decision-making process of the LVCVA. Goodman emphasized the importance of scrutiny in the selection and exploration process of any transportation contract, inclusive of tested and true existing models, citing Fentress Architects and several of their successful projects.

Member Goodman inquired on: 1) How widely the RFP was distributed, and referred to a letter she received from a company in Brazil stating they hadn’t been notified of the RFP; 2) Why the evaluations of proposals and recommendations made without total inclusivity and notification to members of the Board of Directors; and 3) If any excavation or engineering has been performed at the site. Goodman questioned why The Boring Company in particular was chosen, and made the following comments: 4) According to its own website, The Boring Company indicates construction of an underground Loop can cost up to $1B per mile, and Goodman specified the LVCVA site route is two miles. Goodman stated The Boring Company has announced projects, including one from Downtown Los Angeles to Dodger Stadium that and another from Downtown Chicago to O’Hare Airport, that have yet to be realized, as well as the announcement by the Hawthorne City Council authorizing an easement on several properties in front of its airport in exchange for The Boring Company paying a $2.5M encroachment fee, with only $84K being received and the completion of a 1.14 mile test tunnel in Hawthorne thus far, and nothing being opened to the public yet; Member Goodman also stated that 5) During a special session in 2014, Tesla, also owned by Elon Musk, owner of the Boring Company, received $1.3B in tax credits over 20 years with a promise of 22,500 jobs and as of today there are 7,000 people employed at the battery factory. To fund this, $70M of the $80M Nevada Film Tax Credit was reallocated without notification in a special session; and 6) At the North Las Vegas APEX Industrial Park, Hyper Loop tunnel tests were conducted in 2016 and 2018, but the technology is not operation and similar test sites in France, China, and United Arab Emirates have not realized success and that is with significant financial backing. Goodman further stated The Boring Company does not have documented successes nor a track record of achievement, and is exploratory at this time, and that she would like to have further briefing on the entire project to the inclusive Board of Directors of the LVCVA.

Member Pamela Goynes-Brown asked if rideshare services and the taxi authority have been included in the discussions of the impact of this project on those entities, to which Mr. Hill answered no, since he doesn’t anticipate there to be any impact from the project on the Convention Center site.

Member Jenkin echoed Member Goodman’s concerns, shared thoughts on ensuring the clarity of the annual operating expense of this system and software upgrade costs, and expressed concerns on succession planning in the event The Boring Company pulled out of the tunnel-building transportation business due to proprietary technology. Jenkin encouraged the consideration of rebates to the LVCVA for their contribution of business to potential expansion lines. Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 8 of 13

Mr. Hill commented that conversations have taken place regarding potential revenue and will be included in contract discussions, and stated The Boring Company’s proposal included sharing any savings if actual operating costs turn out lower than the guaranteed maximum.

Member Weekly asked Mr. Hill if all members of the Board of Directors were thoroughly briefed on this project, and asked Mr. Davis what significant accomplishments have been completed by The Boring Company and how this particular project would be different from other projects previously referenced by Member Goodman as well as other people movers, to which Mr. Davis replied The Boring Company has completed a 1.14 mile test tunnel in Hawthorne, California, and the technology that goes into Loop is twofold – the tunnel, and the vehicle. Mr. Davis acknowledged tunnels have been bored for more than 100 years, but The Boring Company can do it faster and less expensive and can back that by being willing to all firm-fixed price and performance based contracts. Mr. Davis described the tunnels as being similar to water tunnels, and the benefits of Tesla vehicles versus traditional train- based systems including diligence in safety testing, costs, and user experience.

Mr. Hill stated the LVCVA did reach out to everyone on the Board of Directors, but was unable to connect with a couple of them, the recommendation was not made until about a week prior to this meeting, and clarified this vote is for authority to move forward with the negotiation of a contract with the Board being provided more information over the next couple of months. Mr. Hill reiterated Mr. Davis’s comments regarding other people mover options being unaffordable for the LVCVA.

Member Weekly asked for clarification that this item approval was to allow staff to move forward to put language together for the Board of Directors before a contract is finalized, to which Mr. Hill replied yes. Member Weekly thanked Mr. Davis and his team for their time, and expressed interest in learning other opinions including Member Goynes-Brown’s question about impacts on ridesharing, impacts on the Las Vegas Monorail, the thoughts of the Nevada Resort Association (NRA), and the impact on first responders, and safety and security.

Member Fiore stated she was fully briefed and expressed the need to be cautious on this decision, and asked for clarification about the accuracy of meeting minutes, to which Mr. Puschnig explained the minutes provide a summary of what was said and the audio is available for reference. Member Fiore asked that if anyone wanted to hear audio of any questions, comments, or remarks that it was on the record, to which Mr. Puschnig replied yes. Member Fiore suggested abating the item until the next meeting so all members of the Board of Directors can be fully briefed, expressed concerns regarding the LVCVA’s ability to pay for the underground tunnel and detailed her research indicated other underground tunnels have been built for $750M per mile compared to this project between $40M and $50M per mile, stating the cheapest bid isn’t always best. Fiore also expressed concerns regarding Mr. Musk’s history of overpromising and underperforming in Nevada, reiterated Member Goodman’s comments regarding a previous legislation allowing up to $1.2B in tax incentives from film tax be diverted to the building of Tesla’s Gigafactory outside of Reno, emphasized the need for reassurance about costs and the review of all potential problems and contingencies, and reiterated her desire for abating this item for one more meeting.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 9 of 13

Mr. Hill clarified the statement of Tesla promising 22,000 jobs in Nevada was an estimate by the Governor’s Office of Economic Development for the number of total jobs that would be created in the community because of the 6,500 jobs committed by Tesla. Mr. Hill cited a study that was published in November 2018 showing Tesla overperformed in every category, generating 7,800 jobs, about 20% more than what was committed, and investing more than $7B in the Tesla Gigafactory in order to receive incentives, about 40% over the original projected amount. Mr. Hill described the exceptional performance of the Tesla Gigafactory in the state of Nevada and his support of the use of film tax credits for the factory, described his experiences in working with Mr. Musk, and expressed disagreement with the statement Mr. Musk or Tesla has overpromised and underperformed. Hill clarified there is time to negotiate a contract and receive input from the Board of Directors, but the process must be started now and once the contract is negotiated, would come back to the Board of Directors for approval, and would be performance based.

Secretary Leavitt asked for clarification about the transportation of up to 11,000 people per hour with 16-passenger vehicles, to which Mr. Davis answered the size of the station drives capacity and detailed departure cycles and number of lanes within each station.

Secretary Leavitt asked about the parking of the vehicles while not in use, to which Mr. Davis answered they will be in the stations, in parallel lanes, detailed the scaling of on-peak and off-peak times by reducing the frequency of travel, and the immediate availability of vehicles during off-peak times.

Vice Chair Noonan referred to Member Weekly’s question about the NRA’s position on this subject, and said the NRA have been studying it on a bigger scale than the LVCVA campus and has gotten “pretty good” reviews so far. Vice Chair Noonan detailed questions he asked during his briefing on this, including the use of alternative vehicles in the tunnel to which he was assured those factors have been addressed. Vice Chair Noonan asked Chair Brown to describe his perceptions about the selection process.

Treasurer Bowling thanked the evaluation committee, agreed with the validity of Member Goodman’s questions, emphasized the sense of urgency to move forward, and clarified today’s discussions are for further exploration of the subject at hand, and the focus should remain on the transportation of the LVCVA’s guests.

Member Marz remarked on the tried and true, as well as the unique and different attributes Tesla brings with this project, and the innovative merging of technologies. Member Marz asked for clarification that none of the other proposals were affordable, to which Mr. Hill answered yes, and Member Marz agreed with Treasurer Bowling’s comment about the need to move forward in the conversations.

Chair Brown referred to Vice Chair Noonan’s previous question regarding the selection process, stating there were originally nine responses to the RFP that were brought down to two that were interviewed, primarily due to costs. The two that went forward met the criteria the selection committee was looking for, and the most appealing thing about The Boring Company was that it was presenting something different from the other proposals without a cumbersome aesthetic impact. Brown stated there was strong consensus from the evaluation committee on The Boring Company recommendation in relation to cost, aesthetics, and concept, and expressed his satisfaction with the work of the evaluation committee. Chair Brown acknowledged Member Goodman’s concerns, expressed the urge to move forward with negotiations, and reiterated the Board of Directors will make the decision on the final contract that will be brought back to them.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 10 of 13

Member Fiore asked Chair Brown for clarification of moving forward with the vote for Item 9 means moving forward with just The Boring Company, or if there are any other companies involved with the negotiating, provided comparison between existing tunnels, and the proposed Las Vegas Convention Center tunnel, and reiterated her desire of abatement of the item until the next meeting.

Chair Brown confirmed the recommendation for Item 9 was for The Boring Company to be part of the Convention Center expansion, and commented on the LVCVA’s promotion of the expansion.

Fiscal Impact There is no budgetary impact from this action. The estimated system cost is between $35 million and $55 million, depending on route, number of stations, and size of stations.

Chair Brown moved and it was carried by vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, and with the exception of Members Fiore, Goodman, and Jenkin who opposed, to: 1) Award RFP #19-4570, Las Vegas Convention Center District Campus Wide People Mover, to The Boring Company; and 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President to negotiate a design, construction, and operations agreement with The Boring Company.

Chair Brown added that as part of the motion, outreach be provided to each member of the Board of Directors to find out how much more they want to be briefed.

ITEM 10. Appointment of External Audit Firm Ed Finger, Chief Financial Officer, requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Reappointment of Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern (PBTK) as the independent audit firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, at an estimated fee of $49,500; 2) Reappointment of PBTK to conduct a separate examination of Las Vegas Convention Center District (LVCCD) activities as imposed by the Southern Nevada Tourism Improvements Act at an estimated fee of $6,000 and; 3) Authorizing the Chief Financial Officer to execute the agreement.

Fiscal Impact FY 2020 $55,500 Expenditure

Secretary Leavitt disclosed her relationship to Tom Donohue of PBTK.

Chair Brown disclosed PBTK handles his campaign expense reports.

Member Goodman disclosed PBTK handles her campaign and political expenses.

Member Weekly and Member Goynes-Brown disclosed their use of PBTK as well.

Chair Brown asked Mr. Puschnig if disclosing members could still vote, to which Mr. Puschnig replied yes.

Vice Chair Noonan moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Reappoint Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern (PBTK) as the independent audit firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, at an estimated fee of $49,500; 2) Reappoint PBTK to conduct a separate examination of Las Vegas Convention Center District (LVCCD) activities as imposed by the Southern Nevada Tourism Improvements Act at an estimated fee of $6,000 and; 3) Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute the agreement.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 11 of 13

ITEM 11. Legal Counsel’s Report and Recommendation(s) and Contract Report Mr. Puschnig had no new legal items to report, but presented purchasing and other report(s) required by Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and/or Board Policy.

This was an information item and did not require Board action.

COMMITTEES ITEM 12. LVCCD Committee Report The LVCCD Committee met on February 26, 2019, to discuss items A-C. Committee Chair Chuck Bowling presented a report to the Board of Directors.

Terry Miller of Cordell Corporation provided a PowerPoint presentation on Item 12B.

No action required on items A-C. Item A. Las Vegas Convention Center District Expansion and Renovation Project – Phase Two Item B. Las Vegas Convention Center District Expansion and Renovation Project – Phase Three Item C. Las Vegas Convention Center District Phase Three Renovation Project Architect of Record Services

Committee Chair Bowling provided a comment regarding the vast amount of work that has been put into ensuring the facility is best in class.

This was an information item and did not require Board action.

GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION

13. Las Vegas Convention Center District Phase Three Renovation – Architect of Record Recommendation Mr. Jicinsky requested the Board of Directors consider: 1) Approving the recommendation of Klai Juba Wald / Design Las Vegas to provide professional services as the Architect of Record (AOR) for the Las Vegas Convention Center District (LVCCD) Phase Three Renovation Project as presented; and 2) Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President, or his designee, to enter into negotiations of the professional services agreement with Klai Juba Wald / Design Las Vegas.

Fiscal Impact In accordance with Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 623, Article 623.800, the prospective Architect of Record may not submit professional fees or compensation rates until after the Architect of Record has been selected based upon their qualifications and their demonstrated competence to perform the services solicited. The negotiated contract for professional services agreement, including scope, schedule, and fees, will be brought back to the Board of Directors at a future meeting for final approval.

Vice Chair Noonan disclosed Boyd Gaming does work with Klai Juba Wald, to which Mr. Puschnig confirmed Mr. Noonan can still vote.

Member Goodman moved and it was carried by unanimous vote of the voting members present, including Member Rapson and Member Sewald via telephone, to: 1) Approve the recommendation of Klai Juba Wald / Design Las Vegas to provide professional services as the Architect of Record (AOR) for the Las Vegas Convention Center District (LVCCD) Phase Three Renovation Project as presented; and 2) Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/President, or his designee, to enter into negotiations of the professional services agreement with Klai Juba Wald / Design Las Vegas.

Member Weekly expressed his excitement for KME Architects’ ability to participate in the LVCCD Project because of their community outreach efforts and providing exposure opportunities to community youth.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 12 of 13

DIRECTORS’ RECOGNITION Member Goynes-Brown provided information on the opening of the African Chamber of Commerce and Tourism.

Member Fiore provided information on upcoming events including the Annual Bluegrass Festival on March 23 from 1:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Centennial Hills Park, Las Vegas Days Parade and Rodeo (formerly known as Helldorado Days) on May 10 and May 11 at CORE Arena, Movies in the Park on April 5 at 7 p.m. at Centennial Hills Park Amphitheater, Easter Egg Hunts on April 12 and April 13, and a Cinco de Mayo event at Centennial Hills Park.

Member Marz provided information on Henderson’s annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade on Water Street on the morning of March 16.

Treasurer Bowling provided a summary on the celebration of Mandalay Bay’s 20-year anniversary celebration.

Secretary Leavitt provided information on the March 18 ribbon cutting event for the Boulder City Express, a new tour bus stop in Boulder City’s Historic District.

Member Weekly provided information on Clark County’s declaration of March as Opioid Awareness Month, an upcoming prayer breakfast and workshops focused on opioid awareness and education, encouraged the public to get informed on the opioid crisis, and provided information on a “Day of Giving” community awareness project he assigned a class he teaches at the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV).

Member Fiore exited the meeting at 11:19 a.m.

Chair Brown provided a reminder and invited the public to the Las Vegas Welcome Sign St. Patrick’s Day lighting on March 14 at 6 p.m.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR BY THE PUBLIC Aleta Dupree expressed excitement about the new transportation system for the [convention center] campus, commented on the Chapter 704 process, encouraged mindfulness about diversity and disability in the design of the campus renovation and expansion, and the use of technology and apps.

Ken Evans, President of the Urban Chamber of Commerce, congratulated Urban Chamber of Commerce members Mel Green and Emanuele Arguelles of KME Architects, thanked the Board of Directors, and recognized LVCVA staff for its commitment in ensuring diversity and inclusion in its [LVCCD] project. Mr. Evans recognized Guy Martin for doing his part in ensuring diversity and inclusion.

Daniel Braisted provided information on his three handouts that were distributed to the Board and public regarding extending convention times for locals, the possibility of adding lofts to airports and gaming facilities, the idea of designated Veteran tables at restaurants, and the possibility of mentioning the number of patents that have been applied for in Las Vegas or Clark County.

Member Weekly exited the meeting at 11:27 a.m.

Cyrus Hojjaty, expressed his excitement regarding The Boring Company’s transport system, and inquired the state of the Monorail with the competition, and discussed the possibility of Las Vegas becoming a commuter town.

Ed Uehling discussed the process of the underground transportation system including the release of the proposal, described his efforts in trying to get a Chinese company to build a free subway system in Las Vegas, discussed his efforts in contacting the Cordell Corporation and Turner Martin-Harris, and commented on the Chinese company’s request for additional time due to lack of labor force information.

Member Marilyn Spiegel exited the meeting at 11:33 a.m.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors March 12, 2019 Minutes Page 13 of 13

Michael Garwood expressed his support of The Boring Company’s plan, commented on the meeting’s food items, encouraged Mayor Goodman to “keep the pressure on the Feds” for the widening of I-15.

ADJOURNMENT

Chair Brown adjourned the meeting at 11:34 a.m.

Respectfully submitted, Date Approved: April 9, 2019

Silvia Perez Larry Brown Executive Assistant to the Board of Directors Chair

The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. A Source: boereport.com Back to theFuture Banning Garrett AEROMOVEL TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGES OF AND ENVIRONMENTAL THE INHERENTECONOMIC © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved replaces theinterim solution. idea. earlier the Finally,eventuallyand newtechnology challenges the of realization possible makes and matures solution eventually technological advanced But more the technology. existing the on based less are advanced in technological concept that but more practical systems by practice in overtaken are but systems These are promising, systems. practical as disappointing or products The experiments non-existent. first or immature is idea to the technology realize time existing are the a These but before inventions, realized. brilliant born effectively be are can that they when ideas of pattern a than any other elevated system. process construction the in disruption and land less requiring thus footprint, smaller a with profile lower a less expensive to build, operate, and maintain, and has elevated is efficient, energy more substantially an is that system possible makes Aeromovel systems. eooe’ pemtc ehooy follows technology pneumatic Aeromovel’s compared with other existing and planned planned and future existing the other with in compared and now technology system transit automated superior offers eromovel Photo ofanelectric carbuiltbyThomas Parker inEngland, 1895,andaTesla Model3 Source: www.flickr.com/photos/automobileitalia/44751575205 to provide cheap fuel. By the 1930s, production of of electric cars hadceased. production 1930s, the By fuel. cheap provide to lines and by the emergence of the petroleum industry assembly T Model the with Ford Henry by affordable made were 1910s the by which engines, combustion and internal automobileswith as expensive as weretwice range, poor with batteries lead heavy had these cars But electric. was barrier speed km/hour 100 40% and ICE for steam driven. The first 22% vehicle of any kind to to break the compared market the of 38% cars,with engine (ICE) combustion internal than and by the early 20th Century, they were more popular Century 19th early the in built were cars electric first practical andeconomically cost effective. 19 the from sustainable. idea the better a realizationof the is hyperloop, and car electric economically the like Aeromovel, Moreover, and environmentally more inherently is that mover people automated an possible makes patented that Aeromovel’s system propulsion is pneumatic It itself. technology the th We have seen this pattern with the electric car. The Aeromovel’s advantages lie in the nature of of nature the in lie advantages Aeromovel’s Century that only now has become technologically Page 1 of 6 The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. Source: slate.com © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved attempts to build a viable system were deployed in in deployed were system viable a build Various to turns. attempts sharper and grades higher negotiate also could It derail. notcould and track the on held was the bottom of the rail car. The system was safer since it at pipe the along slot a through“piston” a pressureon which through pipe compressed a air pushed or pulled the vehicle forward by above rails on traveled itself, car which energy the in less engine no required was there and since operat to lighter much potential was car many rail The trains. engine-powered had steam over advantages that system transportation pneumatic a proposed inventors of number a 1800s, early the In technology. immature but idea superior a combustion internal The run. ….” sight in good is end the a But had engine combustion internal “the 2017, August in it put Economist The As novelty. a interim technology that likely will eventually become to theGPSsystem, to become self-driving vehicles. last several decades, from microchips to the Internet the of sensors and technologies digital in advances iPhones with wheels, building on all the extraordinary becoming are cars electric Moreover, maintain. to totooperate,build, cheaper and They be trains. will are simpler, with fewer moving parts and lighter drive improving rapidly and dropping in cost. is Ultimately, electric cars technology battery but cars, electric power to batteries of range and cost the been has possible. gains drawback main The viable. increasinglycars electric incremental only made have developments technological Meanwhile, with nearly reached limit has its the technology fuel but increasingly efficient, be to engineered been has ICE The transmission. complicated a and heavy system requiring similarly power aheavy and inefficient, despite highly century, build, to last expensive complicated, very the being for trucks and cars for Aeromovel also has roots in the 19th Century with with Century 19th the in roots has also Aeromovel an is it but overnight, disappear not will ICE The technology dominant the been has ICE The An illustration oftheshort-lived BeachPneumaticTube transport system inNew York City, 1867, and anartist’svisionofaHyperloop pneumatictrain inthenearfuture Source: shutterstock.com ytm ht il rnpr pol ad ag over cargo hundreds ofmilesat upto 700milesperhour. and people transport will that system hyperloop first the build to on is race The people. transporting for tube pneumatic the back bring to Now, case. the however, technologymaturingthe is steam with engines and then electric motors, as continues first to be technology, conventional more with built were systems be transit Subway to systems practical. these for enough mature not was technology Yorkthe City,New in including century, 19th the of end the through up built were systems using such of number a Although pressure. air pipes pneumatic large through trains send to systems experimental built Inventors roots. Century 19th electric vehicles. by “obsolesced” be will that cars ICE with tohappen likely is same CRTstoThe cost. and performance in superior far are screens flat now and – disappeared virtually has CRT,which the to superior clearly was it enough, cheap and enough good became screen flat the Once ship. and tobuild expensive large,and heavy,is that monitor computer or television (CRT) TubeRay Cathode the to likened be can car engine first patent was awarded in1979. the where UK, system including five countries in patented was The pressure. low using of concept the and tube, pneumatic the also is that guideway elevated an other systems. to Aeromovel alternative introduced electric superior blowers, and viable the a of century previous idea superior the made that technology new on capitalized Aeromovel until abandoned were trains Pneumatic-powered system. competitive a build to primitive too was times the of technology the engine, railway concept was theoretically superior to the steam system, which operated from commercial 1843-1855. While the pneumatic first the Railway, Atmospheric Dalkey the including Century, 19th the of middle the h “yelo” iial i a ehooy with technology a is similarly “Hyperloop” The Page 2 of 6 The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. It’s intheTechnology andSystem Design Source: irishtimes.com © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved a primary factor in the energy consumption of the the of consumption energy the in factor primary is a weight The malfunction. motor from reinforcement passengers floorboard the and train the powering motors electric large the of result a as heavy inherently are cars The guides. the along lines high-voltage poweredmotorsby and electric onboard improve environmental sustainability. requirements, energy efficiency of operations reduce and maintenance, and intelligence enhance artificial further and to Things, of sensors Internet advanced the printing, of 3D as such techniques carbon like materials manufacturing new concrete, CO2-sequestering and fiber on capitalize will 4.0 for Futureiterationsperformance. enhance tofurther 2.0 3.0, has many significant, patented improvements over fromfirstthe system. currentThe Aeromovel system, improvements many has 2013, in Alegre Porto in built was which 2.0, Aeromovel improvement. continued is still operating. The Aeromovel platform has room for and 1.0) (Aeromovel Jakarta in ago years 30 of which built was iteration first been the system, APM its has improve constantly to Aeromovel developments and technological adapting alternatives. transit other economically other mass and systems to (APM) mover people compared more automated sustainable inherently environmentally system 9, onindustry, innovation,andinfrastructure. SDG and action, climate on 13 communities,SDG and Development Sustainable cities sustainable on 11, SDG especially UN’s (SDGs), Goals the meet to world the can around cities by efforts system to significantly contribute employed Aeromovel The been APMs. conventional have in that technologies” sustainable “interim less economically and environmentally and inefficient, complex, costly, the obsolete makes Conventional APM systems designs are based on on based are designs systems APM Conventional Aeromovel’s makes technology pneumatic This It future. the of technology the is Aeromovel An illustration oftheDalkey Atmospheric Railway inIreland from theLondon News, January6,1844, and Aeromovel’s pneumaticautomated people moverinPorto Alegre, Brazil (Aeromovel 2.0) o protect to Isolation Valve Source: Aeromovel pictures database Source: Aeromovel database by onboard frictionbrakes). stop stoppingtoor (with vehicle augmented move the causes plate piston the on acting differential pressure the - simple Very vacuum. partial a create to duct the the into from air exhaust to air pressure or positive createto duct blow either to line the along located are is that sealed with rubber flaps. Stationary electric air blowers slot longitudinal a through running mast a by connected is that duct the within “piston”— a — plate square a toattached is car Eachrail. running the under duct air an forms that girder box concrete a through and profile footprint oftheelevated system. the and construction in time reduces and which cost ride, they which on system elevated the of bulk) (and strength required reduce cars lighter the reduce energyentirerequirementsThirdly, substantiallysystem.the of the cars lighter the Secondly, 50%. nearlyFirstly,cars by the of weight reducesthe it system. entire the for implications profound has step This motors.onboard for need the eliminating of step the piers andtrackway supportingthesystem. for requirements strength and critical size a the is in also factor cars the of weight heavy The ratio. passenger to dead-weight high a has which system, Intake Illustrative image oftheAeromovel’s working principle The key is that the cars are powered by air blown blown air by powered are cars the that is key The revolutionary the takes system Aeromovel The STATION Air Propulsion Unit Isolation Valve Propulsion Plate MOVEMENT DIRECTION Propulsion Plate Outake Page Air Isolation Valve 3 of 6 The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved are very limited in ability to climb gradients, while the the while gradients, climb to ability in limited very are engines on-board with APMs of Moreover,types both operation). of years 30 after even Jakarta in replaced longer and the rails last indefinitely (they far have not been last wheels their traction, require don’t and air by pushed are cars Aeromovel the Since replacement. requirerailscomplicated also repairand and expensive and wheels their movement, for traction and friction railsrelyand also wheels systemson steel the with But rails. steel on likewheels that, Aeromovel,steel on ride the APMs some rubber areguideways, concretethere along tires on of ride systems APM most overhaul While guidewas. time-consuming requiring and surface concreteexpensive the the concrete wear on can guiderails pressure the (at and frequently cost) replaced significant be to have tires rubber the years, friction. for last which more rails and times wheels steel the five Unlike have which concrete, on tires rubber of instead tracks steel on wheels steel use of the for allows This system. the move to with wheels compared the by traction for times need the eliminating of advantage 3 the has or also air by Propulsion 2 systems. conventional by passenger per consumption electricity reduces station) passenger Vehicle carbody Transportation Blower Speed Rail Fastener The propulsion system of blowers (about every every (about blowers of system propulsion The Top Speed Operation Guideway Capacity Switch capacity loopsystem plates onsteelframe Isostatic single-web Isostatic single-web Aeromovel 1.0 Riveted aluminum Riveted aluminum Semi-automatic, Low to medium- concrete beams Jakarta (1989) No switch attended 70 km/h Fixed Rigid Porto Alegre (2013) Automatic, attended Isostatic single-web Isostatic single-web Low-capacity single Aeromovel 2.0 Low-cycling switch concrete beams shuttle system Fiberglass 80 km/h Variable Elastic by new advancesintechnology. upgraded continually be can platform Aeromovel the Moreover, specifications. technical and requirements comparable to all other systems on a long list of system operationThe maintenance. and system or superior is construction, of cost on and concerns environmental critical most the on systems APM other all to superior technology and design makes possible a system that is or down shut modified duringthe be system’s construction. to had which of none bridges, and freeways pre-existing Alegre, circumvent Porto to built in was which system Aeromovel the was with as done obstacles, pre-existing around weaves that much make sharper turns. This makes possible designing a can system trains the thus and motors electric with cars in used axel rigid a on than rather mounted or greater. propelledthan traction,by gradientsclimb can 7.5% of rather air by pushed are they since trains, Aeromovel Overall, the Aeromovel’s inherently superior superior inherently Aeromovel’s the Overall, In addition, the Aeromovel wheels are independently capacity pinched-loop capacity pinched-loop High-cycling standard Elastic low-noise and Elastic low-noise and plates onsteelframe doubleweb concrete Adherent aluminum Aeromovel 3.0 Variable, feed-back Variable, feed-back Current design Medium to high- anti-vibration Hyperstatic unattended Automatic, crossover 80 km/h system control beams Advanced low-noise Advanced low-noise Aeromovel 4.0 integrated network Spatial steel-truss Spatial steel-truss and anti-vibration fiber monocoque Ultralight carbon forward control Double slip and Double slipand Variable, feed- A.I. automatic, High-capacity High-capacity 2020 design scissor-type unattended crossovers 120 km/h beams Page 4 of 6 The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. disruption compared withother systems. city and time minimum with rapidly installed and site nearby a at order to prefabricated be can guideways and pillars the addition, In relocation. expensive and time-consuming require often be which undergrounds, to foundations structural system tocity the varied in toenable obstacles bypass and impact. distance pillars the environmental between allows design systems and the Moreover, costs construction reducing substantially stations, and pillars guideways, the for concrete less 60% and 20% between require They APMs. other for structures elevated than build to expensive less significantly are structures elevated Due to the ultra-light weight of the rail cars, Aeromovel fiber, since they do not require heavy weight to ensure to weight heavy require not do they fiber, since also can be made with lighter materials, including carbon the rail cars, the cars are far less expensive to build. They system propulsionguideway. the systemin notSince is the along compartments in or ground the on shelters protected in installed is system propulsion the Instead, dust. and temperaturechanges,showers, abrupt water this systems, vibrations, shock, constant suffer not propulsion does equipment on-board In unlike replace. addition, or maintain to inexpensive relatively and quantities, large in produced reliable, extremely is that equipment industrial standard are required on- equipment for electric other and necessary blowers The motors. electric equipment board and design onboard the in or ground the guideway,theyrequire not do expensive and special the on are equipment electric and Cost andEnvironmental Impact Technological Superiority Reduces © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved system options. transit comparable to relative impact its environmental reduce system the of characteristics these of All transitsystemstocars.lighter other due the that print foot smaller substantially a have rails guide elevated the up holding pillars The systems. other limits which traction, need not do thus and air gradesby up pushed are cars rail the since more or 7.5% of gradients and systems) other formeters 100 comparedwith meters (20 curves sharp negotiate can system The of-ways. right- existing using by can them eliminate virtually cases Aeromovel radius, low- some turning in and costs acquisition land significantly reduce design, sharp elevated and its to profile, Due elevated movers. conventional other people and even monorails and including rail, technologies, light cars, street to bring can requirementsland in comparedadvantages enormous Aeromovel challenges. right-of-way and and can complicate a transit project with legal variables kilometer per million $50 to up cost easily can system ic ms o te propulsion the of most Since Equipment costs: costsConstruction of guideways and stations: acquisitioncosts:Land Land acquisition for a transit

Source: Serguey Nogueira daSilva-PhD,2013 by the“sail”providing propulsion. guideways the tosecured are they as derail not do they 15 years when subject to high-frequency operations. 10- every replaced be to designed is system sealing require costly overhaul. Aeromovel’s longitudinal air rails,and unlikesteel time deterioratethat, over can guideways concrete expensive and massive more require traction as well foras replacementstire expensive and frequent friction and tires rubber with APMs Other replacement. without years 100 than the Aeromovel system are expected to last for more of rails The wheels. the on traction of wear friction railssteel with wheels steel uses it since the without system also rolling requires very little Therepair or replacement motors. with electric systems on-board proprietary than expensive less repair significantly parts is or replacement any custom proprietary, than and rather “off-the-shelf” is equipment and low-cost maintenance. for limited Moreover, since very the blowers industrial demands Aeromovel industrial propulsion, long-lasting and onboard provides zero-emissions transportation. is powered by renewable energy sources, Aeromovel system with the If sources. even power electric conventional benefits cost as well significant as has environmental sharp consumption This energy system. in reduction the heavy on other, depending to systems, compared required energy less more) (or difference 70% grows passengers,that to few with run vehicles the when than operation off-peak energy In less technologies. mover people 30% or rail electric other least at uses Aeromovel to its light weight and pneumatic propulsion system. due efficiency energy in advantage huge a has also on-board require however,APMs, that other AeromovelUnlike operators. systems BRT and rail over light advantage cost operating comparable a has Wh/pax-km Maintenanceparts moving minimum costs:With APMs, other like Aeromovel, Operating costs: 385 550 440 495 330 220 165 275 110 55 0 0 Energy Consumption by Transit Mode 50 100 Passengers onboard 150 200 250 300 350 Aeromovel A-200 LRT BRT Page 5 of 6 The images in this technical article are illustrative with no commercial value. © 2018Coester Group AllRightsReserved o st o atce cr) ht ae collisions makes that cars cars) impossible. Moreover, attached betweenif power is lost to the blowers, of pocket” sets “air (or an propulsion provides air system The circumstances. under catastrophic except derail cannot they that ensures and cars rail track the tocars the holds ducts the guiderail the inside of bottom the to attached inherent “sail” The provides systems. design other these in unavailable features safety its standards, monorails safety and mover people automated other to o ol i Armvl ul comparable fully Aeromovel is only Not Safety: Faculty, Singularity University. Senior Fellow, GlobalUrbanDevelopment,and Senior Fellow, GlobalFederation ofCompetitiveness Councils; PhD, isStrategic Advisorto Aeromovel; Banning Garrett www.advancedmobility.tech

provide additionalsafety for thesystem. that braking precision for breaks friction on-board also are There pipelines, plants. power nuclear refineries, and gas in used equipment to similar is that and uses safe and highly reliable industrial equipment controlling the stationary blowers and control valves the rail in cars. motorsThe control electric system primarily consists of of control by not duct, guiderail the inside pressure air the controlling by provided primarily is control since system the of design the by enhanced further is Safety stop. simply cars the

Page 6 of 6