DOCSLIB.ORG

Retail Market Demand and Impact Analysis – City of Elliot Lake, Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retail Market Demand and Impact Analysis – City of Elliot Lake, Ontario Retail Market Demand and Impact Analysis – City of Elliot Lake, Ontario Prepared for: The City of Elliot Lake November 22, 2012 November 21, 2012 Mr. Rob De Bortoli CAO, Elliot Lake Elliot Lake City Hall 45 Hillside Drive North Elliot Lake, ON, P5A 1X5 Dear Mr. De Bortoli: Re: Retail Market Demand and Impact Analysis – City of Elliot Lake, Ontario urbanMetrics inc. is pleased to submit our report, which details our analysis of the market opportunity for additional retail/service commercial space in the City of Elliot Lake. The Elliot Lake Economic Development Advisory Committee has engaged urbanMetrics to undertake a detailed analysis of the Retail Sector in the City of Elliot Lake in light of the Algo Mall tragedy and provide the Community with a formal assessment of the retail/service commercial growth prospects in the short, medium and long-term. As a result of the Algo Mall closure, almost 20% of the commercial capacity in the City of Elliot Lake has been eliminated. This report provides an assessment of the existing and future market demand for a full range of retail/service commercial and identifies the warranted additional space in each store category. It is also intended to provide Elliot Lake with a strategy for managing its retail and service commercial space to ensure that the appropriate balance of goods and services is available locally. The analyses and appendices in the attached report provide our detailed study findings and conclusions. Yours truly, urbanMetrics inc. Peter Thoma, MCIP, RPP, PLE Partner Market Demand and Impact Analysis – The City of Elliot Lake, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 STUDY APPROACH .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2 RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL MARKET ANALYSIS .......................................... 5 2.1 TRADE AREA DELINEATION ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 MARKET CHARACTERISTICS ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 HISTORIC & FORECAST POPULATION .................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 PER CAPITA INCOME .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 REVIEW OF RETAIL COMPETITION ........................................................................................................ 7 2.3.1 EXISTING TRADE AREA RETAIL FACILITIES ..................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................................... 8 3 RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 9 3.1 FOOD STORE RETAIL (FSR) ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 FOOD STORE EXPENDITURES .................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 SUPERMARKET ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 NON-FOOD STORE RETAIL (NFSR) ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 13 3.2.1 NON-FOOD STORE RETAIL EXPENDITURES .................................................................................. 13 3.2.2 BUILDING AND OUTDOOR HOME SUPPLY STORE ANALYSIS ................................................ 16 3.2.3 PHARMACY AND PERSONAL CARE STORE ANALYSIS ............................................................... 18 3.2.4 CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES STORE ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 20 3.2.5 FURNITURE, HOME FURNISHINGS AND ELECTRONICS STORE ANALYSIS..................... 22 3.2.6 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORE ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 24 3.2.7 MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL STOREANALYSIS ................................................................................... 26 3.3 PER CAPITA SPACE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 28 3.4 RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 30 4 COMMERCIAL STRATEGY .................................................................................................... 32 4.1 WARRANTED SPACE IN ELLIOT LAKE OUTSIDE PEARSON PLAZA ........................................ 32 4.2 SUMMARY OF MARKET DEPTH ............................................................................................................. 33 4.3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 36 APPENDIX A – ONTARIO MINISTRY OF FINANCE POPULATION PROJECTIONS ....... 40 APPENDIX B – RETAIL INVENTORY ........................................................................................ 45 APPENDIX C – NAICS CODES ...................................................................................................... 48 1 Market Demand and Impact Analysis – The City of Elliot Lake, Ontario APPENDIX D – RETAIL ANALYSIS BACKGROUND ............................................................... 52 APPENDIX E – CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS ...................................................................... 56 APPENDIX F – RETAIL IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 72 APPENDIX G – MARKET DEPTH STORE LIST ....................................................................... 81 2 Market Demand and Impact Analysis – The City of Elliot Lake, Ontario 1 INTRODUCTION urbanMetrics inc. has been retained by the City of Elliot Lake (‘the City’, ‘Elliot Lake’) to undertake an independent market analysis to determine the amount of additional retail/service commercial space need to serve the local market. In this report, urbanMetrics analyze local market conditions in Elliot Lake, and neighbouring jurisdictions, to quantify the amount of warranted, additional retail space that could be built in Elliot Lake, taking into consideration the space already exists, plus the space that is “tentatively proposed” as part of Pearson Plaza redevelopment project. 1.1 STUDY APPROACH 1.1.1 RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS The following work plan has been undertaken to evaluate the retail market opportunity for the additional retail/service commercial space in the City of Elliot Lake: 1. Trade Area Delineation: A Trade Area has been defined for the project based on a number of factors including: existing and future competition in the local area, plus the anticipated drawing power of the Pearson Plaza. The Trade Area has been further divided into a Primary Zone (Elliot Lake) and a Secondary Zone (Spanish, Blind River, North Shore, Mississagi River IRI, and Serpent River IRI). 2. Retail and Service Commercial Inventory: An inventory of retail and service commercial uses has been undertaken in the Primary Zone of the defined Trade Area, including vacant floor space. 3. Determine the Dimensions of the Trade Area Market: The population in the Trade Area has been determined for selected years of the study period to 2031. Historic and current population levels are based on the Statistics Canada 2006 and 2011 Census data. Future population levels are based on the Ontario Ministry of Finance projections for the Algoma Census Division. In addition, income and expenditure levels have been determined for Trade Area residents for a variety of food store retail (“FSR”) and non-food store retail (“NFSR”) store categories and have been analyzed based on the expenditure approach. 4. Calculate Market Opportunity: Two types of analyses have been utilized to evaluate the market opportunity for retail and service space in the Trade Area: 1) expenditure based approach for FSR and NFSR space, and 2) per capita space analysis approach to determine the appropriate amount of service space. 5. Evaluate Impact: Based on our market analysis, any sales transfers required from existing and future potential competitive stores in the City of Elliot Lake have been determined. 3 Market Demand and Impact Analysis – The City of Elliot Lake, Ontario Specifically, our market analysis and impact assessment has identified (a) the amount of retail and service commercial space warranted in the City of Elliot Lake; (b) the amount of space which could be accommodated beyond the space currently proposed as part of Pearson Plaza; (c) whether it would result in transfers from existing in the Primary Zone; (d) the magnitude of sales transfers, if applicable; and (e) whether the sales transfers would impact the viability of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEG Magazine
    SUMMER 2016 Dr. Steve E. Hrudey, P.Eng. APEGA's 97th President The Association of Professional apega.ca Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta | WE SPECIALIZE IN SIMPLE, COST-EFFECTIVE AND RELIABLE FACILITY DESIGNS. Gold-plated designs are out of place under any market conditions. That’s why we focus on JVZ[LɈLJ[P]LLUNPULLYPUN[OH[ZPTWSPÄLZMHJPSP[`VWLYH[PVUZHUKTHPU[LUHUJL>LZ[YLHTSPUL LX\PWTLU[HUKKLZPNUZWLJPÄJH[PVUZ[VYLTV]LJVZ[S`V]LYKLZPNUHUKTPUPTPaLJVTWSL_P[` Put our experience to work for your project. Learn more at vistaprojects.com Contents PEG FEATURED PHOTO: SUMMER 2016 PAGE 10›› 34 52 68 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 8 & 9 New Council, Summit Recipients 4 President's Notebook 65 Viewfinder 10 Meet the President 6 Interim CEO’s Message 72 AEF Campaign Connection 15 Council Nominations Begin 20 Movers & Shakers 75 Focal Point 40 What’s Next in Legislative Review? 34 Professional Development 82 Member Benefits 49 All About apega.ca 52 Good Works 84 Record 68 Science Plus Youth Equals This 60 And You Are COVER PHOTO: Kurtis Kristianson, Spindrift Photography PRINTED IN CANADA SUMMER 2016 PEG | 1 US POSTMASTER: PEG (ISSN 1923-0044) is published quarterly in Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter, by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta, c/o US Agent-Transborder Mail 4708 Caldwell Rd E, Edgewood, WA 98372-9221. $15 of the annual membership dues applies to the yearly subscription of The PEG. Periodicals postage paid at Puyallup, WA, and at additional mailing offices. US POSTMASTER, send address changes to PEG c/o Transborder Mail, PO Box 6016, Federal Way, WA 98063-6016, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Buildings Fail: Are We Learning from Our Mistakes?
    Buildings 2012, 2, 326-331; doi:10.3390/buildings2030326 OPEN ACCESS buildings ISSN 2075-5309 www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/ Editorial Why Buildings Fail: Are We Learning From Our Mistakes? M. Kevin Parfitt Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1 814 863 3244; Fax: +1 814 863 4789 Received: 30 August 2012 / Accepted: 31 August 2012 / Published: 5 September 2012 1. Introduction Most building professionals have investigated or performed remedial designs for at least one architectural or engineering system failure during their careers. Other practitioners, especially those who work for forensic consultants or firms specializing in disaster response and repair, are more familiar with the variety and extent of building failures as they assist their clients in restoring damaged or deficient buildings. The advent of social medial and twenty-four-hour news channels along with the general ease of finding more examples of failures in the Internet have made us realize that building failures in the broad sense are much more common than we may have realized. Relatively recent events leading to building failures such as the Christchurch, New Zealand earthquakes, the roof/parking deck of the Algo Centre mall in the northern Ontario, Canada city of Elliot Lake and the Indiana State Fairground stage collapse in the US are just a few reminders that much more work needs to be done on a variety of fronts to prevent building failures from a life safety standpoint. The need is compounded by economic concerns from what would be considered more mundane or common failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Elliot Lake Commission of Inquiry
    Report of the Elliot Lake Commission of Inquiry Executive Summary The Honourable Paul R. Bélanger Commissioner Report of the Elliot Lake Commission of Inquiry Executive Summary The Honourable Paul R. Bélanger Commissioner The Report consists of three volumes: 1. The Events Leading to the Collapse of the Algo Centre Mall; 2. The Emergency Response and Inquiry Process; and 3. Executive Summary. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General ISBN 978-1-4606-4566-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4606-4565-9 (Print) © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2014 Recycled paper THE ELLIOT LAKE LA COMMISSION COMMISSION OF INQUIRY D'ENQUETE ELLIOT LAKE The Honourable Paul R. Bélanger, L'honorable Paul R. Bélanger, Commissioner Commissaire October 15, 2014 The Honourable Madeleine Meilleur Attorney General of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Dear Madam Attorney, I am pleased to deliver to you the Report of the Elliot Lake Commission of Inquiry in both its English and French versions, as required by the Order in Council creating the Inquiry. Part One examines the events leading up to the collapse of the Algo Centre Mall in Elliot Lake on June 23, 2012 and Part Two looks at the emergency response to the collapse. Both volumes contain my recommendations for changes to rules, regulations, practices and procedures related to the maintenance and inspection of publicly accessible buildings and the emergency response to disasters. The third volume is an executive summary. I hope that the Report will lead to a safer Ontario. It has been an honour and a privilege to serve as Commissioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cod Moratorium 20 Years Later (Length: 15:01) 4
    Credits Resource Guide Writers: Jill Colyer and Jennifer Watt Host: Michael Serapio Producer: Mike Prokopec Video Writer: Mike Prokopec Production Assistant: Carolyn McCarthy Supervising Manager: Laraine Bone Visit us at our Web site at our Web site at http://newsinreview.cbclearning.ca, where you will find News in Review indexes and an electronic version of this resource guide. As a companion resource, we recommend that students and teachers access CBC News Online, a multimedia current news source that is found on the CBC’s home page at www.cbc.ca/news/. Close-captioning News in Review programs are close-captioned. Subscribers may wish to obtain decoders and “open” these captions for the hearing impaired, for English as a Second Language students, or for situations in which the additional on-screen print component will enhance learning. CBC Learning authorizes the reproduction of material contained in this resource guide for educational purposes. Please identify the source. News in Review is distributed by: CBC Learning, P.O. Box 500, Station A, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5W 1E6 • Tel: (416) 205-6384 • Toll-free: 1-866-999-3072 • Fax: (416) 205-2376 • E-mail: [email protected] • www.cbclearning.ca Copyright © 2012 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News in Review, September 2012 1. Colorado Shooting Rampage (Length: 18:15) 2. Quebec Students Speak Out (Length: 18:11) 3. Cod Moratorium 20 Years Later (Length: 15:01) 4. Elliot Lake Mall Collapse: A Preventable Tragedy? (Length: 16:07) CONTENTS In This Issue .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Gazette Volume 147 Issue 01, La Gazette De L'ontario Volume 147
    Vol. 147-01 Toronto ISSN 00302937 Saturday, 4 January 2014 Le samedi 4 janvier 2014 Parliamentary Notice Avis parlementaire Election Finances Act Loi sur le financement des élections Statement by the Chief Electoral Officer Énoncé du directeur général des élections Related to the Indexation Factor au sujet du facteur d’indexation for the Five-Year Period 2014–2018 pour la période de cinq ans allant de 2014 à 2018 Pursuant to subsection 40.1(2) of the Election Finances Act, R.S.O. 1990, Conformément à l’article 40.1, paragraphe 40.1(2) de la Loi sur le Chapter E.7, as amended, notice is hereby given of the statement of the financement des élections, L.R.O. 1990, chap E.7, ainsi modifiée, je indexation factor required by section 40.1, subsection 1, applicable to the vous annonce par les présentes le facteur d’indexation comme l’exige five-year period from January 1st 2014 to December 31st 2018. The indexation l’article 40.1, paragraphe 40.1(1), pour la prochaine période de cinq ans factor was calculated based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price allant du 1er janvier 2014 au 31 décembre 2018. Le facteur d’indexation Index for Canada for prices of all items for the 60-month period ending a été calculé à partir de la variation en pourcentage de l’indice des prix October 31st, 2013 as published by Statistics Canada, rounded to the nearest à la consommation pour le Canada sur les prix de tous les articles pour two decimal points.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was There No Public Inquiry Into the Lac-Mégantic Disaster? Mark Winfield York University June 2017
    Justice Denied: Why was there no public inquiry into the Lac-Mégantic Disaster? Mark Winfield York University June 2017 Abstract This paper examines the reasons why, despite the magnitude and significance of the Lac-Mégantic disaster, no formal public inquiry was called into the tragedy. In doing so it explores the substantive and political rationales for establishing public inquiries in circumstances like Lac-Mégantic, and the reasons why the various investigations that have been undertaken by the Transportation Safety Board and others into the disaster do not constitute an adequate substitute for a formal inquiry. The paper then employs a modified institutional-ideological analytical framework to examine the landscape, ideational, societal, and institutional factors that have worked against the calling of an inquiry. The paper concludes that the concept of a formal inquiry likely faced major opposition at the political and official levels within the Government of Canada, as well as major non-governmental actors in transportation and fossil fuel sectors. Finally, the paper discusses the implications of the decision not to call an inquiry in the Lac- Mégantic case for the role of inquiries in similar circumstances in the future. Introduction The deadliest rail accident in Canada of the past century unfolded in the early hours of July 6th, 2013. An unattended train of 73 car-loads of crude oil from the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota, operated by the Montreal, Maine and Atlantic (MMA) railway, ran away and then derailed, exploded and burned in the heart of the small Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic. Forty-seven of the town’s residents died in the ensuing inferno.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Community Profile CITY OF ELLIOT LAKE, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0098 NOVEMBER 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca . Community Profile: Elliot Lake, ON November 28, 2014 Document History Title: Community Well-Being Assessment – Community Profile – The City of Elliot Lake, ON Revision: 0 Date: June 29, 2012 Hardy Stevenson and Associates Limited Prepared By: Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 1 Date: August 3, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 2 Date: September 21, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 3 Date: August 30, 2013 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Andrzej Schreyer, Noah Brotman and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 4 Date: January 31, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Dave Hardy and Noah Brotman Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 5 Date: February 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 6 Date: March 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 7 Date: June 4, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved
    [Show full text]
  • The Retirement Living Years 1999–2005 Leaks from the Rooftop Parking Deck Were an Ongoing Issue in the Mall During the Period of Nordev’S Ownership
    SECTION IV The Retirement Living Years 1999–2005 Leaks from the rooftop parking deck were an ongoing issue in the Mall during the period of NorDev’s ownership. In spite of this problem, NorDev spent relatively paltry amounts of money to maintain the roof. CHAPTER New Owner, No New Solutions Background to Retirement Living . 207 The genesis and launch of Retirement Living .................................................. 207 Retirement Living gets off the ground with 1,450 properties and $3.5 million ................. 208 Composition of the membership of Retirement Living ......................................... 208 Retirement Living and the City of Elliot Lake were closely linked ............................... 209 Management of Retirement Living ............................................................ 209 Confidentiality within Retirement Living obstructed the flow of information to the City of Elliot Lake .............................................................................. 210 Retirement Living buys the Algo Centre . .213 Algocen intends to shut the Hotel ............................................................. 213 Algoma is serious about closing the Hotel ..................................................... 214 Retirement Living considers possible ownership of the Mall and the Hotel .................... 214 Algocen maintains control over its information ................................................ 215 Architects provide Retirement Living with a proposal for a building condition assessment .... 217 The City
    [Show full text]
  • Elliot Lake Mall Collapse: a Preventable Tragedy?
    News in Review – September 2012 – Teacher Resource Guide Elliot Lake Mall Collapse: A Preventable Tragedy? SETTING THE STAGE Two people were killed and 22 other people were Note to Teachers injured when the roof of the Algo Centre Mall in The classroom must promote a safe place Elliot Lake collapsed on June 23, 2012. The speed for students to discuss sensitive issues such and efficiency of emergency response to the as disaster and death. Prepare students for collapse has been criticized, and the mall's safety the topics that will be discussed and allow and structural integrity will be questioned in a for individual reflective time in addition to public inquiry. small group activities where students can safely process their thoughts and emotions. MINDS ON DISCUSSION 1. Imagine that you just received a text message from your friend saying that a nearby mall/community centre had collapsed. How would you respond? 2. Have you ever been concerned about the structural safety of a building? To whom would you report your concerns? 3. Do you think that the government should be responsible for creating laws regarding the safety of buildings? Why or why not? 4. What problems do you anticipate a rescue crew may have in attempting to find survivors and bodies in a collapsed building? 5. Hypothesize probable causes of the roof collapse of a mall. 6. Locate Elliot Lake on a map of Canada. Determine three distinguishing attributes of this community 28 SEPTEMBER 2012 — ELLIOT LAKE MALL COLLAPSE: A PREVENTABLE TRAGEDY? FOCUS FOR READING As you read the background information below on the Algo Centre Mall collapse, record your answers to the following questions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1986–99: Leaks Persist – the Problem Will Be Sold
    CHAPTER 1986–99: Leaks Persist – The Problem Will Be Sold 1986–9: The first years of Rod Caughill’s employment by Algocen . 137 Rod Caughill learns of the leaks soon after being hired ........................................ 137 Mr. Caughill is asked to look for solutions ...................................................... 137 1987: Algocen develops a maintenance routine that includes daily checks for loose caulking and water-damaged tiles ............................................................. 138 1988–9: The Library moves to the Mall, despite warnings about leaks .......................... 139 1989: Ken Snow is hired by Algocen as the maintenance supervisor for the Algo Centre and observes visible leaks ..................................................................... 141 1990: The City is hit by mine shutdowns, the leaks persist, and the owner continues to deal with the roof in the same way . .142 The City suffers a significant blow ............................................................. 142 The Mall continues to lose money for Algocen ................................................. 144 Algocen documents its roof maintenance procedures, which never changed .................. 144 1990, A particularly bad year for leaks: Algocen is warned, and agrees, that the roof will “be a problem forever” – and continues to repair it in its usual way ............................ 145 Algoma did not apply for, and the City did not ask for, building permits for any of the repairs .. 148 Algocen gets advice from engineers but does not repair the roof . .148 Autumn 1990: Algocen seeks engineering advice on repairing the leaks and the state of degradation; it had concerns about structural damage from years of leaks .................... 148 January 1991: Trow is retained to provide a condition survey of the parking deck, told that Algocen had concerns about structural damage, and told to report on the structural integrity .
    [Show full text]
  • October 17, 2014 – Vol
    October 17, 2014 – Vol. 19 No. 42 New missing persons policy announced Oct 10 2014 TORONTO - The Ontario govern- ment is immediately ending joint road safety blitzes with the Can- ada Border Services Agency be- cause the feds used one to arrest undocumented workers. Page 3 Oct 10 2014 The First Nation community of Opitciwan says it can no longer afford to keep its beleaguered aboriginal police force up and run- ning, despite an agreement signed in March that was designed to help keep the tiny department afloat. Page 3 Oct 15 2014 BANFF, Alta. - Provincial justice ministers are expected to de- Oct 10 2014 of Canada’s approximately 1,181 murdered mand this week that the federal In the wake of its unprecedented and missing aboriginal women. government recommit to funding report on murdered and missing In an interview with The Globe and the legal aid program. aboriginal women, the RCMP has Mail shortly before the policy was finalized, Page 5 rolled out a revamped national RCMP Superintendent Tyler Bates said missing persons policy, including the forms would reinforce the “gravity” of Oct 16 2014 a pair of investigative tools that missing-person cases and ensure every in- provide a lens into how police ap- OTTAWA - The federal govern- vestigative angle is explored. proach disappearances. The detailed missing-person intake re- ment plans to amend the law gov- The policy, which was circulated to port could prove burdensome for officers erning the Canadian Security In- commanding officers in September, in- who are already “stretched to the limit,” said telligence Service to give the spy troduces two standardized documents: a Inspector Mario Giardini, who heads the agency more authority to track 13-question risk-assessment form and a 10- Vancouver Police Department’s diversity terrorists overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report
    Strategic Clarity Annual Review 2014 Contents PEO STAFF CONTACTS CONTENTS Association staff can provide information about PEO. 2 Council list/staff contacts/contents For general inquiries, simply phone us at 416-224-1100 3 President’s message or 800-339-3716. Or, direct dial 416-840-EXT using 4 Registrar’s report/Register the extensions below. 5 2014 Statistics at a glance 6-9 Strategic clarity REGULATORY PROCESS EXT 10-11 Abbreviated financials (full financial statements available on PEO’s Registrar website and in the May/June issue of Engineering Dimensions) Gerard McDonald, P.Eng., MBA 1102 12-13 Chapter highlights Senior executive assistant 14 Honours Becky St. Jean 1104 16-19 Volunteers Deputy registrar, regulatory compliance Linda Latham, P.Eng. 1076 Manager, complaints and investigations 2014-2015 PEO COUNCIL AND EXECUTIVE STAFF Ken Slack, P.Eng. 1118 Officers Manager, enforcement President West Central Region councillors Marisa Sterling, P.Eng. 647-259-2260 J. David Adams, P.Eng., MBA, FEC Robert Willson, P.Eng. Deputy registrar, licensing and finance Past president Danny Chui, P.Eng., FEC Michael Price, P.Eng., MBA, FEC 1060 Annette Bergeron, P.Eng., MBA, FEC Lieutenant governor-in-council appointees Manager, admissions President-elect Ishwar Bhatia, MEng, P.Eng., FEC Moody Farag, P.Eng. 1055 Thomas Chong, MSc, P.Eng., FEC, PMP Santosh K. Gupta, PhD, MEng, Manager, licensure Vice president (elected) P.Eng., FEC Pauline Lebel, P.Eng. 1049 George Comrie, MEng, P.Eng., CMC, FEC Richard J. Hilton, P.Eng. Manager, registration Vice president (appointed) Rebecca Huang, LLB, MBA Lawrence Fogwill, P.Eng. 1056 Michael Wesa, P.Eng., FEC Vassilios Kossta Supervisor, examinations Executive members Mary Long-Irwin Anna Carinci Lio 1095 Nicholas Colucci, P.Eng., MBA, FEC Sharon Reid, C.Tech.
    [Show full text]