Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-952

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-952 Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-952 PDF version Ottawa, 22 December 2010 Notice of hearing 4 April 2011 Gatineau, Quebec Group-based licence renewals for English-language television groups Deadline for submission of interventions/comments: 28 January 2011 [Submit an intervention/comment or view related documents] The Commission will hold a hearing commencing 4 April 2011 at 9:00 a.m., at the Conference Centre, Portage IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the applications described below: Introduction In A group-based approach to the licensing of private television services, Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167, 22 March 2010 (Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167), the Commission announced a new group-based approach to the licensing of private television services affiliated with larger Canadian broadcasting groups (the group-based policy). The Commission indicated that the new group-based framework would apply, at the outset, to ownership groups that generate more than $100 million in annual revenues from private, English-language conventional television stations and own at least one English-language specialty and/or pay programming service. The groups meeting the criteria at this time are CTVglobemedia (CTVgm), Shaw Media Inc. (Shaw) and Rogers Broadcasting Ltd. (Rogers). Accordingly, the Commission has received applications from these large broadcasting ownership groups for the renewal of the television stations and specialty and pay services listed below. In addition, Corus Entertainment Inc. (Corus) has requested that its television services also be renewed under the new group-based licensing framework. The Commission has also received a separate renewal application from Shaw Cablesystems Ltd. (Shaw Cablesystems) for the CJBN-TV service located in Kenora, Ontario. Since this station shares common ownership with some of the larger ownership groups, the Commission will treat its renewal application as part of this proceeding. Some of the groups have also applied for revocation of licenses that will not expire until 2012 or later. The granting of new licences as of September 2011 will allow these services to immediately be part of the new group-based policy. Pursuant to Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167, each of the large ownership groups have submitted group renewal applications for their various affiliated services on a group basis. All of the key proposed amendments submitted with respect to the conventional television stations operated by each of these groups can be found under the 2 application number assigned to the group as specified below. The key amendments proposed with respect to their pay and specialty services follow under individual application numbers. Item Applicant Application 1. CTVglobemedia Inc. 2010-1261-6 2. Shaw Media Inc. 2010-1307-8 3. Corus Entertainment Inc. 2010-1350-8 4. Shaw Cablesystems Limited 2010-1306-0 5. Rogers Broadcasting Limited 2010-1253-3 Preamble In implementing this framework through the group-based policy, the Commission’s objective is to provide private broadcasting groups with greater flexibility in the allocation of resources amongst their various television platforms while permitting the Commission to consider factors such as the total audience reached by a broadcasting group, the totality of its revenues and of its programming commitments and obligations. While providing greater flexibility to television services, this new framework will also permit the Commission to ensure continued support for the creation of Canadian programming, particularly in categories that continue to be under-represented in the Canadian broadcasting system. In particular, the Commission has announced new group-based Canadian programming expenditure (CPE) requirements and additional requirements related to programs of national interest (PNI), which the Commission has defined as scripted drama, documentaries and Canadian awards shows. Key issues In this proceeding, the Commission will implement the group-based policy, including the CPE and PNI requirements and the various other changes set out in Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167 and in Regulatory frameworks for broadcasting distribution undertakings and discretionary programming services – Regulatory Policy, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2008-100, 30 October 2008 (Broadcasting Public Notice 2008-100), and other recent proceedings. In this regard, the key issues the Commission will consider include: • Group-based Canadian programming expenditures; • Group-based programs of national interest expenditures; • Groups treated in this proceeding; • Terms of trade; and • Digital television transition. 3 In addition, the Commission will examine a number of specific changes proposed by the applicants, as set out in items 1 to 5 below. Canadian programming expenditures During the current and previous licence terms, certain pay and specialty services operated by the large broadcast ownership groups have been required to spend a percentage of their individual revenues on the purchase and production of Canadian programming. Similarly, conventional television stations have generally been required to broadcast a minimum of 8 hours per week of “priority” programming (drama, documentaries, regional programs, etc.). In Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167, the Commission set out a new approach that recognizes the role played by large ownership groups in the production and broadcast of Canadian programming. Under this new approach, each of the following services will be required to spend a percentage of its revenues on the purchase and production of Canadian programming, and the total amount of expenditures across all applicable services in a group will equal a set percentage of the total group revenues: • all conventional television stations; • all Category A pay and specialty services; and • all Category B services with more than one million subscribers that are part of each group. Competitive mainstream sports and news specialty services are excluded from this regime. The Commission stated that it would set an appropriate group-level CPE requirement for each group that would maintain the historical level of spending by the group, in addition to the individual CPE requirements set for the services that are part of that group. In Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167, the Commission took the preliminary view that an appropriate group CPE for each of the ownership groups would represent a minimum of 30% of aggregate revenues. The Commission further indicated that specialty and pay services that are subject to the group-based CPE requirement will be given the flexibility to meet the requirement by spending up to 100% of their required CPE on Canadian productions broadcast, on other qualifying specialty or pay services or on television stations that are part of the same group. Conventional television stations will be permitted to spend up to 25% of their CPE requirements on productions broadcast by other qualifying specialty services that are part of the group. Programs of national interest In Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-167, the Commission indicated that it would replace the current requirements related to priority programming with requirements on the group to spend a set amount of annual revenues on PNI (programs from program categories 7 Drama and comedy and 2(b) Long-form documentary, as well as specific Canadian award shows that celebrate Canadian creative talent). The Commission’s 4 preliminary view was that a requirement that groups spend at least 5% of revenues on PNI would be appropriate. The Commission also indicated that the services that are part of these groups should be subject to a condition of licence requiring that at least 75% of PNI expenditures be allocated to independently-produced programs. Finally, the Commission stated that it expects that the groups will commission PNI production from all regions of Canada commensurate with their presence in the respective markets in which they broadcast. In order to assist the Commission in making its final determinations on the appropriate spending level for PNI, the Commission requested further information from the groups relating to current and historical expenditures on these types of programming. Applicant’s proposals regarding CPE and PNI As part of their applications in this proceeding, all four of the large broadcast ownership groups have proposed that group-based CPE and PNI requirements be set as follows: • CPE and PNI expenditure requirements in year one of the new licence term would be calculated based on an average of the revenues in each of the three previous broadcasting years; • CPE and PNI requirements in years two to five of the licence term would be calculated based on revenues earned in the previous broadcasting year; • Each group has some flexibility to under spend or over spend a portion of their CPE and PNI requirements in any given broadcasting year, provided that the total minimum aggregate amounts are spent over the course of the licence term; and • CPE requirements for conventional television stations would be based on a formula. This formula would take the total dollar amount of the CPE requirement for all of the applicable services in the group in a given year and subtract the dollar amounts of the CPE requirements of all of the pay and specialty services in that group. The remainder is the dollar amount of the CPE requirement for conventional stations in that group for that year. Groups treated in this proceeding
Recommended publications
  • CHANNEL LISTING FIBE TV from Your Smartphone
    Now you can watch your Fibe TV Download the Fibe TV content and manage recordings app today at CHANNEL LISTING FIBE TV from your smartphone. bell.ca/fibetvapp. CURRENT AS OF FEBRUARY 25, 2016. E MUCHMUSIC HD ........................................1570 TREEHOUSE ...................................................560 GOOD E! .............................................................................621 MYTV BUFFALO (WNYO) ..........................293 TREEHOUSE HD .........................................1560 E! HD ...................................................................1621 MYTV BUFFALO HD ..................................1293 TSN1 ....................................................................400 F N TSN1 HD ..........................................................1400 A FOX ......................................................................223 NBC - EAST .................................................... 220 TSN RADIO 1050 ..........................................977 ABC - EAST .......................................................221 FOX HD ............................................................1223 NBC HD - EAST ...........................................1220 TSN RADIO 1290 WINNIPEG ..................979 ABC HD - EAST ............................................. 1221 H NTV - ST. JOHN’S .........................................212 TSN RADIO 990 MONTREAL ................980 A&E .......................................................................615 HGTV................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2014-26
    Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2014-26 PDF version Ottawa, 29 January 2014 Notice of hearing 8 April 2014 Gatineau, Quebec Applications for the renewal of the broadcasting licences for English- language conventional and multilingual ethnic television stations and for certain specialty television services Deadline for submission of interventions/comments/answers: 28 February 2014 [Submit an intervention/comment/answer or view related documents] The Commission will hold a hearing commencing on 8 April 2014 at 9:00 a.m., at the Conference Centre, Phase IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the applications described below. Applicant and Locality Appearing items Specialty Category A services 1. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Across Canada Application 2013-1771-9 2. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Across Canada Application 2013-1772-7 3. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Across Canada Application 2013-1773-5 4. Sportsnet 360 Television Inc. Across Canada Application 2013-1774-3 2 Specialty Category B service 5. 6878482 Canada Inc. Across Canada Application 2013-1775-1 Specialty Category C service 6. Rogers Sportsnet Inc. Across Canada Application 2013-1776-9 Conventional television stations 7. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Montréal, Quebec Application 2013-1759-5 8. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, Woodstock and Ottawa, Ontario Application 2013-1760-3 9. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, London and Ottawa, Ontario Application 2013-1765-2 10. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, London and Ottawa, Ontario Application 2013-1766-0 11. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Portage La Prairie, Manitoba Application 2013-1761-0 12. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Calgary and Lethbridge, Alberta Application 2013-1762-8 13. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Calgary, Alberta Application 2013-1768-6 14.
    [Show full text]
  • CRTC Drama Statistics Charts
    February 9, 2011 Robert A. Morin Submitted via E-Pass Secretary General Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2 Dear Mr. Morin, Re: Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-952 – Group-based Licence Renewal for English-language Television Groups 1. The Writers Guild of Canada (the WGC) is the national association representing over 2000 professional screenwriters working in English-language film, television, radio and digital media production in Canada. The WGC is actively involved in advocating for a strong and vibrant Canadian broadcasting system containing high-quality Canadian programming. While the WGC‟s mandate is to represent our members, in advocating a strong Canadian broadcasting system that offers Canadians a variety of programming, we also play a role in balancing competing interests in the broadcasting system. The WGC wishes to comment on the above-mentioned Notice of Consultation. 2. The WGC requests the opportunity to appear at the public hearing scheduled to commence on April 4, 2011 in order to further elaborate on the following issues from the perspective of creators of Canadian programming. Executive Summary 3. The WGC supports the Commission‟s initial assumption that all broadcast groups should have the same group CPE as the impact will be proportional to each group based upon its revenues and regardless of its asset mix. It appears that 30% of revenues would be an appropriate CPE for all broadcast groups. 4. Group-based PNI CPE proposals of 5% of revenues will result in broadcasters spending less than historical levels on dramas, documentaries and award shows. It appears, based upon the available data, that a PNI CPE of 10% would be more appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2004-21
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2004-21 Ottawa, 21 January 2004 CHUM Limited and 3661458 Canada Inc., partners in Pulse24, general partnership Ontario Application 2002-0956-1 Public Hearing in the National Capital Region 26 May 2003 CablePulse24 – Licence renewal In this decision, the Commission renews the broadcasting licence for the specialty television service known as CablePulse24, from 1 March 2004 to 31 August 2010. The details regarding the licensee’s specific proposals for the new licence term, and the conditions of licence and other obligations determined by the Commission are set out below. The application 1. The Commission received an application by CHUM Limited and 3661458 Canada Inc., partners in Pulse24, general partnership (Pulse 24) for the renewal of the broadcasting licence for the regional (Ontario), English-language, specialty television service known as CablePulse24 (CP24). 2. The Commission's general analysis with respect to its consideration of this and other applications heard at the 26 May 2003 Public Hearing for the licence renewal of specialty television services is set out in Introduction to Broadcasting Decisions CRTC 2004-6 to 2004-27 renewing the licences of 22 specialty services, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 21 January 2004 (Public Notice 2004-2). 3. The Commission received six interventions specifically in support of CP24’s licence renewal. 4. Other interveners raised general concerns related to all of the specialty television licence renewal applications considered as part of this public process. These concerns are discussed in Public Notice 2004-2. 5. On the basis of its review of this licence renewal application and having considered the interveners' comments, the Commission renews the broadcasting licence for CablePulse24, from 1 March 2004 to 31 August 2010.1 The licence will be subject to the conditions specified therein and to the conditions set out in the appendix to this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • CEO Report - Public
    Board Meeting – October 20, 2010 CEO Report - Public John Campbell West Don Lands Waterfront Toronto (“WT”) continues to pursue planning approvals for Phase 2 of West Don Lands (“WDL”). Staff meets weekly with Infrastructure Ontario (“IO”), Ministry of Infrastructure (“MOI”), Ontario Realty Corporation (“ORC”) and the City of Toronto to work through the WDL Phase 2 Plan of Subdivision (“POS”) conditions. It is anticipated that the POS and associated conditions will receive Draft Approval from the Chief Planner in late October, 2010. Toronto Community Housing Corporation (“TCHC”) has advised that it is hoping to have a full building permit by late fall and building occupancy in early 2012. ORC advises that the Risk Assessment Risk Management (“RA/RM”) work for WDL is on schedule to meet with Pan Am Games Athletes’ Village and Urban Capital timelines. The following projects within the WDL are progressing on schedule: Don River Park commenced construction on August 15, 2010; Mill Street Public Realm construction is underway; Underpass Park tenders have been received - WT and ORC are completing an Access Agreement to allow remediation to commence; and Stormwater Management Facility design has commenced. WT and IO are working closely to deliver the Pan Am Games Athletes’ Village. Treasury Board has approved the budget for the Village, allowing the project to proceed. The budget total is subject to Cabinet confidentiality. A Planning, Design and Compliance team (“PDC”) lead by the firm HOK, has been successfully retained to develop the design specifications and work with WT’s Design Review Panel (“DRP”) in creating requirements for the Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”).
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Line-Up VIP Digital Cable (Markham)
    Channel Line-Up VIP Digital Cable (Markham) Here are the channels included in your package CH# INCL CH# INCL CH# INCL Your World This Week 1 Sportsnet 360 44 DIY Network 89 TV Ontario (TVO - CICA) 2 OLN 45 Disney Junior 92 Global Toronto (CIII) 3 Turner Classic Movies 46 Disney Channel 93 OMNI.1 4 TELETOON (East) 47 Free Preview Channel 1 94 TV Listings 5 Family Channel (East) 48 FX 95 CBC Toronto (CBLT) 6 Peachtree TV 49 NBA TV Canada 96 Citytv Toronto 7 CTV Comedy Channel (East) 50 Leafs Nation Network 97 CTV Toronto (CTVTO) 8 FX 51 TSN2 98 YES TV 9 Food Network 52 Sportsnet ONE 99 CHCH 11 ABC Spark 53 Rogers On Demand 100 ICI Radio-Canada Télé (TOR) 12 History 54 TVA Montreal (CFTM) 101 TFO (CHLF) 13 CTV Sci-Fi Channel 55 ICI RDI 102 OMNI.2 14 MTV 56 TV5 103 FX 15 BET (Black Entertainment 57 CPAC English (& CPAC French- 104 CBS Bufalo (WIVB) 16 DTOUR 58 Ontario Legislature 105 Sportsnet ONE 17 Your World This Week 59 Makeful 106 ABC Bufalo (WKBW) 18 VisionTV 60 A.Side 107 Today's Shopping Choice 19 PBS Bufalo (WNED) 61 CTV Toronto (CTVTO) 108 CTV Two Toronto 20 CTV News Channel 62 CTV Kitchener/London (CTVSO) 109 FOX Bufalo (WUTV) 21 Free Preview Channel 1 63 CTV Winnipeg (CTVWN) 110 The Weather Network (Richmond) 22 CTV Life Channel 64 CTV Calgary (CTVCA) 111 CBC News Network/AMI-audio 23 Treehouse 65 CTV Vancouver (CTVBC) 112 CP24 24 BNN Bloomberg 66 CTV Two Atlantic 113 YTV (East) 25 Nat Geo Wild 67 CTV Atlantic Halifax (CJCH) 114 TSN4 26 Family Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    AGENDA: A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS Tuesday, April 22, 2014 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers, Town Hall Pages 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. OPENING PRAYER 3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 4. COUNCIL MINUTES 4.1 Regular Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 25, 2014 6 - 26 4.2 Special Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 27, 2014 27 - 32 5. DEPUTATIONS, PETITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 5.1 Michelle Bouwman, Canadian Tire regarding Jump Start Program 5.2 Barry Brebner, 481 Queen Street, East, St. Marys presentation of Petition regarding Quarrie High Dive 5.3 Ernest Vanderschot, 2834 Perth Road 130, St. Marys presentation - High Dive 6. CONSENT AGENDA Motion: That Consent Agenda Items 6.1 to 6.6 inclusive be adopted by Council. 1 6.1 Regular Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 25, 2014 Motion: THAT the Regular Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 25, 2014 be approved. 6.2 Special Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 27, 2014 Motion: THAT the Special Meeting of Council Minutes dated March 27 2014 be approved. 6.3 Committee of the Whole Minutes - Day 1 and Day 2 dated April 15, 2014 33 - 45 Motion: THAT the COTW Day 1 and Day 2 Minutes dated April 15, 2014 be approved. 6.4 Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum request to consider Induction 46 - 46 weekend as being of municipal significance Motion: THAT Council of the Town of St. Marys consider the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame and Musuem Induction weekend June 19-22, 2014 of "Municipal Significance" in the Town of St.
    [Show full text]
  • PEG Magazine
    SUMMER 2016 Dr. Steve E. Hrudey, P.Eng. APEGA's 97th President The Association of Professional apega.ca Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta | WE SPECIALIZE IN SIMPLE, COST-EFFECTIVE AND RELIABLE FACILITY DESIGNS. Gold-plated designs are out of place under any market conditions. That’s why we focus on JVZ[LɈLJ[P]LLUNPULLYPUN[OH[ZPTWSPÄLZMHJPSP[`VWLYH[PVUZHUKTHPU[LUHUJL>LZ[YLHTSPUL LX\PWTLU[HUKKLZPNUZWLJPÄJH[PVUZ[VYLTV]LJVZ[S`V]LYKLZPNUHUKTPUPTPaLJVTWSL_P[` Put our experience to work for your project. Learn more at vistaprojects.com Contents PEG FEATURED PHOTO: SUMMER 2016 PAGE 10›› 34 52 68 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 8 & 9 New Council, Summit Recipients 4 President's Notebook 65 Viewfinder 10 Meet the President 6 Interim CEO’s Message 72 AEF Campaign Connection 15 Council Nominations Begin 20 Movers & Shakers 75 Focal Point 40 What’s Next in Legislative Review? 34 Professional Development 82 Member Benefits 49 All About apega.ca 52 Good Works 84 Record 68 Science Plus Youth Equals This 60 And You Are COVER PHOTO: Kurtis Kristianson, Spindrift Photography PRINTED IN CANADA SUMMER 2016 PEG | 1 US POSTMASTER: PEG (ISSN 1923-0044) is published quarterly in Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter, by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta, c/o US Agent-Transborder Mail 4708 Caldwell Rd E, Edgewood, WA 98372-9221. $15 of the annual membership dues applies to the yearly subscription of The PEG. Periodicals postage paid at Puyallup, WA, and at additional mailing offices. US POSTMASTER, send address changes to PEG c/o Transborder Mail, PO Box 6016, Federal Way, WA 98063-6016, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2006-13
    Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2006-13 Ottawa, 14 December 2006 The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on 12 February 2007 at 9:30 a.m., at the Delta Bow Valley, 209 – 4th Avenue SE, Calgary, Alberta, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions/comments is 18 January 2007. [Broadcasting intervention/comments form] Item Applicant and locality 1. Crossroads Television System Calgary, Alberta Application No. 2005-0912-7 2. Crossroads Television System Edmonton, Alberta Application No. 2005-0914-3 3. The Miracle Channel Association Calgary, Alberta Application No. 2006-0518-1 4. The Miracle Channel Association Edmonton, Alberta Application No. 2006-0496-9 5. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Calgary, Alberta Application No. 2006-1034-6 6. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Edmonton, Alberta Application No. 2006-1035-4 7. MVBC Holdings Limited Calgary, Alberta Application No. 2006-1037-0 8. MVBC Holdings Limited Edmonton, Alberta Application No. 2006-1039-6 9. CanWest MediaWorks Inc. Calgary, Alberta Application No. 2006-1041-1 10. CanWest MediaWorks Inc. Edmonton, Alberta Application No. 2006-1042-9 11. Only Imagine Inc. Across Canada Application No. 2006-0699-9 2 12. Bhupinder Bola, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated Across Canada Application No. 2006-1200-6 13. CHUM Limited Across Canada Application No. 2006-1501-5 14. CHUM Limited Across Canada Application Nos. 2006-1514-8, 2006-1515-6, 2006-1516-4, 2006-1517-2, 2006-1518-0, 2006-1519-8, 2006-1520-6 and 2006-1521-3 15. Jim Pattison Broadcast Group Limited Partnership Kelowna, British Columbia Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2015 Corus
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM Fiscal year ended August 31, 2015 Corus Entertainment Inc. November 9, 2015 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM ‐ CORUS ENTERTAINMENT INC. Table of Contents FORWARD‐LOOKING STATEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 3 INCORPORATION OF CORUS .................................................................................................................. 4 Organization and Name ............................................................................................................................ 4 Subsidiaries ............................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................... 5 Significant Acquisitions and Divestitures ................................................................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................................. 6 Strategic Priorities .................................................................................................................................... 6 Radio ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Description of the Industry ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Buildings Fail: Are We Learning from Our Mistakes?
    Buildings 2012, 2, 326-331; doi:10.3390/buildings2030326 OPEN ACCESS buildings ISSN 2075-5309 www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/ Editorial Why Buildings Fail: Are We Learning From Our Mistakes? M. Kevin Parfitt Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1 814 863 3244; Fax: +1 814 863 4789 Received: 30 August 2012 / Accepted: 31 August 2012 / Published: 5 September 2012 1. Introduction Most building professionals have investigated or performed remedial designs for at least one architectural or engineering system failure during their careers. Other practitioners, especially those who work for forensic consultants or firms specializing in disaster response and repair, are more familiar with the variety and extent of building failures as they assist their clients in restoring damaged or deficient buildings. The advent of social medial and twenty-four-hour news channels along with the general ease of finding more examples of failures in the Internet have made us realize that building failures in the broad sense are much more common than we may have realized. Relatively recent events leading to building failures such as the Christchurch, New Zealand earthquakes, the roof/parking deck of the Algo Centre mall in the northern Ontario, Canada city of Elliot Lake and the Indiana State Fairground stage collapse in the US are just a few reminders that much more work needs to be done on a variety of fronts to prevent building failures from a life safety standpoint. The need is compounded by economic concerns from what would be considered more mundane or common failures.
    [Show full text]
  • ED362661.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 362 661 CE 064 633 AUTHOR Ormiston, Liz, Ed. TITLE Literacy Works. Volume 3. Fall 1991-Summer 1992. INSTITUTION Saskatchewan Literacy Network, Saskatoon. REPORT NO ISSN-1183-3793 PUB DATE 92 NOTE 131p.; For volumes 1-2, see ED 343 452 and ED 348 892. AVAILABLE FROM Saskatchewan Literacy Network, Box 1520, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 3R5, Canada ($5 single copy; $20 annual subscription). PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Literacy Works; v3 n1-4 Fall 1991-Sum 1992 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; Adult Reading Programs; Annotated Bibliographies; *Educational Practices; Educational Research; Family Programs; *Females; Foreign Countries; Functional Literacy; Information Networks; *Literacy Education; Numeracy; Program Development; Program Effectiveness; *Resource Materials IDENTIFIERS Canada; *Family Literacy; *Plain Language; Saskatchewan Literacy Network ABSTRACT These four issues of the quarterly publication of the Saskatchewan Literacy Network in Canada are each devoted to a separate aspect of literacy and literacy education. In addition to an editorial and series of articles on the issue topic, each issue includes book reviews and network news. Some issues also include interviews an' annotated bibliographies. The first issue, which is devoted to women and literacy, includes articles on literacy and abused women, women and literacy research, literacy needs of domestic workers, and women and mathematics. Included among the topics discussed in the issue devoted to plain language are the following: development of learner-written materials, clear language in government, advocacy for clear language, plain language and the law, plain language and the literacy community, and white collar illiteracy.
    [Show full text]