DOCSLIB.ORG

Buckeye Directory of Connecting Facilities by Location

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buckeye Directory of Connecting Facilities by Location BUCKEYE DIRECTORY OF CONNECTING FACILITIES BY LOCATION CALIFORNIA ILLINOIS (cont’d.) INDIANA (cont’d.) MICHIGAN (cont’d.) San Diego Galesburg Junction Huntington Inkster (Joan Rd. Jct.) Allied Aviation BNSF BP Products NA Sunoco Logistics Kinder Morgan Citgo Petroleum Corp. Harristown Gladieux Trading & Mktg. Niles Buckeye Terminals, LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC Wolverine Pipe Line Co. CONNECTICUT Sun Company, Inc. Bradley International Airport Hartford Niles West Signature Flight Support Buckeye Terminals, LLC Lake George Wolverine Pipe Line Co. Explorer Pipeline Company Buckeye Terminals, LLC Enfield Marathon Pipe Line LLC Explorer Pipeline Company Novi Troiano Oil Co. Norco Pipe Line Co., LLC Delta Fuels Inc. Kankakee West Shore Pipe Line Co. East Hartford Buckeye Terminals, LLC Owosso Sterling St. Terminal, LLC Mt. Vernon Sun Company, Inc. Monee Buckeye Terminals, LLC Melrose TE Products Pipeline Co. LP CountryMark Cooperative, Woodhaven Taylor Energy Inc. BP Products NA Peoria Buckeye Terminals, LLC Middletown/Portland Buckeye Terminals, LLC Muncie Marathon Petroleum LLC B & B Petroleum Buckeye Terminals, LLC Kleen Energy Peotone Port Oil Company Explorer Pipe Line Company South Bend MISSOURI United Oil Recovery Wood River Pipe Lines LLC Buckeye Terminals, LLC Lambert-St. Louis Airport ConocoPhillips (Wood River New Haven Wood River Zionsville Refinery) Gateway Terminal ConocoPhillips Buckeye Terminals, LLC Wood River Pipe Lines LLC Gulf Oil L.P. Wood River Pipe Lines LLC TE Products Pipeline Co. LP Magellan Midstream Marathon Petroleum LLC North St. Louis Terminal Partners, L.P. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Motiva Enterprises, LLC LOUISIANA ConocoPhillips (Wood River New Haven Terminal Inc. INDIANA Opelousas Refinery) Avon Colonial Pipeline Wood River Pipe Lines LLC Rocky Hill CSX Transportation Citgo Petroleum Corp. South St. Louis Terminal Clermont MASSACHUSETTS (Asphalt) Wethersfield/Hartford Buckeye Terminals, LLC Ludlow Buckeye Terminals, LLC Buckeye Terminals, LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC Massachusetts Municipal Global Petroleum NuStar Wholesale Electric Co. South St. Louis Terminal TE Products Pipeline Co. LP U.S. Air Force (Kinder Morgan Processing) Westover Air Force Base Explorer Pipeline Co. FLORIDA East Chicago Dania Badger Springfield Florida Power & Light Co. BP Products NA (LPG only) Armory Terminal Inc. NEVADA BP Products NA (Products) F. L. Roberts Reno Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood Buckeye Terminals, LLC Leonard Belcher Inc. Kinder Morgan International Airport Citgo Petroleum Corp. Global Petroleum Omega Aircraft Service, Inc. Explorer Pipe Line Company Springfield Terminals Swissport Marathon Petroleum LLC Stellar Propane Hialeah Norco Pipe Line Co., LLC Sumer Energy Florida East Coast Railroad NuStar NEW JERSEY Oneok North System, LLC Eagle Point Miami International Airport West Shore Pipe Line Co. MICHIGAN Sun Company Allied N.Y. Services, Inc. Wood River Pipe Lines LLC Bay City Marathon Ashland Linden Port Everglades Elkhart Petroleum LLC BP Products NA (Carteret) Chevron Oil Co. Norfolk Southern Railroad Citgo Petroleum Corp. Citgo Petroleum Corp. Dearborn Colonial Pipeline Co. Motiva Enterprises, LLC Griffith Buckeye Terminals, LLC (2) ConocoPhillips TransMontaigne Terminaling BP Products NA Marathon Petroleum LLC Harbor Products System Vecenergy Sun Oil Co. IMTT (Bayonne Pipeline) Hammond Kinder Morgan Liquid Buckeye Pipe Line Co. Detroit Terminals ILLINOIS Buckeye Terminals LLC BP Products NA NuStar Argo Explorer Pipe Line Co. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Sunoco Logistics Buckeye Terminals, LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC TE Products Pipeline Co. LP West Shore Pipe Line Co. Newark International West Shore Pipe Line Co. (Badger) Ferrysburg Airport Wolverine Pipe Line Co. Wolverine Pipe Line Co. Allied Aviation Service Co. Chillicothe Wood River Pipe Lines LLC of N.Y., Inc. ARC Terminals Ferrysburg East Joint Venture Hartsdale Wolverine Pipe Line Co. Paulsboro Decatur Buckeye Terminals, LLC Plains Marketing Buckeye Terminals, LLC Explorer Pipeline Company Flint Sunoco Company Norco Pipe Line Co., LLC Buckeye Terminals, LLC PetroPlus Refining Co. Des Plaines TE Products Pipeline Co. LP Marathon Petroleum LLC Shell Aviation Effingham Buckeye Terminals, LLC continued … NEW JERSEY (cont’d.) OHIO PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA (cont’d.) Port Reading Aurora Allentown Midland Amerada Hess Corp. Bulk Terminals Storage Petroleum Products Corp. Buckeye Terminals, LLC DCP NGL Services, LP Sewaren Bellevue Booth Marathon Petroleum LLC Motiva Enterprises, LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC Colonial Pipeline Co. Ohio River Pipe Line LLC Kinder Morgan Liquid Terminals Bradley Road Carlisle Neville Island ARC Terminals Roadway Services, Inc. Petroleum Products Corp. BP Products NA NEW YORK Buckeye Terminals LLC Chelsea Philadelphia Airport Albany Citgo Petroleum Corp. ConocoPhillips Aircraft Service Inc. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Inland Corp. Sunoco Logistics Sun Company, Inc. PetroPlus Refining Co. Pittsburgh Brewerton (via Sunoco Logistics) Gulf Oil L.P. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Brecksville Marathon Petroleum LLC Coraopolis Pittsburgh Internat’l Airport Buffalo BP Products NA Aircraft Services, Inc. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Cleveland Drydock Buckeye Terminals, LLC ARC Terminals Petroleum Products Corp. Sinking Spring/Montello Caledonia Buckeye Terminals LLC Petroleum Products Corp. Sunoco Logistics Delmont Sunoco Logistics Columbus Gulf Oil L.P. Geneva Buckeye Terminals, LLC Sunoco Logistics Tuckerton Buckeye Terminals, LLC BP Products NA Buckeye Energy Services LLC Marathon Petroleum LLC Dupont Inwood Ohio River Pipe Line LLC Gulf Oil L.P. Williamsport Carbo Industries, Inc. Sunoco Logistics Petroleum Products Corp. Buckeye Energy Services LLC Global Petroleum Corp. Wood River Pipe Lines LLC Sun Pipe Line Motiva Enterprises, LLC Eldorado Findlay Gulf Oil L.P. J. F. Kennedy International Marathon Petroleum LLC Petroleum Products Corp. TENNESSEE Airport Sunoco Partners Marketing Memphis Allied New York Services Inc. Hilliards & Terminals LP Enterprise Norfolk Southern Railroad FedEx LaGuardia Airport Fullerton Valero Allied New York Services Inc. Lima Gulf Oil L.P. Buckeye Terminals, LLC Petroleum Products Corp. Liverpool Husky Marketing and Supreme Energy, LLC Supply Co. Girard Point Inland Pipeline Sun Company, Inc. (via Long Island City Marathon Petroleum LLC Sunoco Logistics) BP Products NA Marathon Pipe Line LLC Bayside Oil TE Products Pipeline Co. LP Greensburg Getty Petroleum Corp. Wood River Pipe Lines LLC BP Products NA Metro Terminals Corp. Motiva Enterprises, LLC Lorain Harrisburg BP Products NA Petroleum Products Corp. Marcy Buckeye Terminals, LLC (2) Toledo Highspire Mohawk Valley Oil Inc. ARC Terminals Petroleum Products Corp. BP – Husky Refining, LLC Rochester Buckeye Terminals, LLC Indianola Amerada Hess Corp. Citgo Petroleum Corp. Shell Trading Buckeye Terminals, LLC (2) Delta Fuels Inc. Griffith Energy Inland Corp. Lancaster North Albany Terminal Co. Marathon Petroleum LLC Petroleum Products Corp. LLC Norco Pipe Line Co., LLC United Refining Co. Sun Company, Inc. Macungie Sunoco Logistics Buckeye Energy Services LLC Utica Buckeye Terminals, LLC Buckeye Terminals, LLC Global Petroleum Corp. Sunoco Logistics VanBuren Amerada Hess Corp. Malvern Buckeye Terminals, LLC Verona ConocoPhillips Defense Energy Support Ctr. Sunoco Logistics Vestal Mechanicsburg Buckeye Terminals, LLC (2) Gulf Oil L.P. Citgo Petroleum Corp. Petroleum Products Corp. Current as of 2/2011 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Would You Like to Write ''The Formation of Perhydrophenalenes and Polyalkyladamantanes by Lsomerization of Tricyclic Perhydroaromatics ?''
    would you like to write ''The Formation of Perhydrophenalenes and Polyalkyladamantanes by lsomerization of Tricyclic Perhydroaromatics ?'' How's that again? Well, never mind Athabasca oil sands project in North­ ings in Exploration, Production, -Bob Warren, Ed Janoski, and Abe ern Alberta to multiply the world's Manufacturing, Research, Engineer­ Schneider already wrote it. They're petroleum resources; plan a new $125 ing, Sales, Accounting, Economics, chemists in Sun Oil Company's Re­ million processing facility in Puerto and Computer Operation. Locations search and Development Department. Rico; expand the Toledo Refinery to - Philadelphia, Toledo and Dallas Their paper is just one of many re­ the tune of $50 million; sponsor the areas. sulting from imaginative and origi­ "Sunoco Special" and the racing team You may write us for an appoint­ nal basic research conducted at Sun of Roger Penske and Mark Donohue ment, write for our book "Sunoco Oil. in big league sports car racing to Career Opportunities Guide," or con­ Maybe basic research and technical competition-prove and improve Sun­ tact your College Placement Director papers aren't your cup of tea. But oco products for the public; pursue a to see Sun's representative when on isn't the kind of company that in­ continuing program for air and water campus. SUN OIL COMPANY, Indus­ vests in and encourages such projects pollution control; beautify Sunoco trial Relations Dept. CED, 1608 Wal­ the kind of company you'd like to service stations everywhere. nut Street, Philadelphia, Pa.19103 or work for? Sunoco is geared for growth. We P . O. Box 2880, Dallas, Texas 75221.
    [Show full text]
  • Conocophillips: Rule 14A-8 No-Action Letter
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-4561 Januar 31, 2011 Michael S. Telle Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 711 Louisiana Street Suite 2300 Houston, TX 77002 Re: ConocoPhillps . Incoming letter dated December 17, 2010 Dear Mr. Telle: Ths is in response to your letters dated December 17, 2010 and Janua 24,2011 concernng the shareholder proposal submitted to ConocoPhillps by the AFL-CIO Reserve Fund. We also have received a lttter from the proponent dated Januar 7, 201l. our response is attached to the enclosed photocopy of your correspondence. By doing this, we avoid having to recite or sumarze the facts set forth in the correspondence. Copies of all of the correspondence also will be provided to the proponent. In connection with this matter, your attention is directed to the enclosure, which sets forth a brief discussion ofthe Division's informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals. Sincerely, Gregory S. Bellston Special Counsel Enclosures cc: Robert E. McGarrah, Jr. Counsel, Office of Investment American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations 815 Sixteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Januar 31, 2011 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: ConocoPhilips Incoming letter dated December 17, 2010 The proposal requests that the board prepare a report on the steps the company has taen to reduce the risk of accidents. The proposal fuher specifies that the report should describe the board's oversight of process safety management, staffing levels, inspection and maintenance of refineries and other equipment. Weare unable to concur in your view that ConocoPhilips may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(10).
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon Agreement
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION __________________________________________ ) In the Matter of ) ) Marathon Petroleum Corporation, ) a corporation, ) ) Express Mart Franchising Corp., ) File. No. 181-0152 a corporation, ) ) Petr-All Petroleum Consulting Corporation, ) a corporation, and ) ) REROB, LLC, ) a limited liability company. ) __________________________________________) AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) has initiated an investigation of the proposed acquisition by Respondent Marathon Petroleum Corporation, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Speedway LLC (collectively “Marathon”), of retail fuel outlets from Respondents REROB, LLC, Petr-All Petroleum Consulting Corporation, and Express Mart Franchising Corp. (collectively “Proposed Respondents”). The Commission’s Bureau of Competition has prepared a draft administrative complaint (“Draft Complaint”). The Bureau of Competition, Proposed Respondents, and Sunoco LP (“Sunoco”) enter into this Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent Agreement”) to divest certain assets and providing for other relief to resolve the allegations in the Draft Complaint through a proposed Decision and Order and Order to Maintain Assets, all of which are attached, to present to the Commission. IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Proposed Respondents and Sunoco, by their duly authorized officers and attorneys, and counsel for the Commission that: 1. Proposed Respondent Marathon Petroleum Corporation is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under, and by virtue of, the laws of the State of Delaware, with its office and principal place of business located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, Ohio 45840. 2. Proposed Respondent Express Mart Franchising Corp. is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under, and by virtue of, the laws of the State of New York, with its office and principal place of business located at 7401 Round Pond Road, Syracuse, New York 13212.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Material Profile
    prepared for North Carolina Statewide North Carolina Department of Transportation Multimodal Freight Plan prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Pipeline and Hazardous Material with Profile IEM February 1, 2017 report North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Pipeline and Hazardous Material Profile prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 730 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500 Atlanta, GA 30318 with IEM date February 1, 2017 North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Overview, Data and Methodology .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Organization of the Report ......................................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Fuels .................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1 Fuel Model ................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2 Fuel Volumes by Mode in 2015 and Projections to 2045 .......................................................... 2-8 2.3 Pipelines .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sunoco Pipeline L.P
    Sunoco Pipeline L.P. 1300 Main St. Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (713) 989-7000 Website: www.energytransfer.com Energy Transfer Partners, a Texas-based energy company founded in 1995 as EMERGENCY CONTACT: a small intrastate natural gas pipeline 1-800-786-7440 or 877-839-7473 company, is now one of the largest and most diversified master limited PRODUCTS/DOT GUIDEBOOK ID#/GUIDE#: PRODUCTS/DOT GUIDEBOOK ID#/GUIDE#: partnerships in the United States. Butane 1011 115 Light Cycle Oil 1993 128 Strategically positioned in all of the major Ethane 1035 115 Propane 1075 115 U.S. production basins, the company Fuel Oil 1993 128 Diesel owns and operates a geographically Fuel, Aviation, (Ultra Low Sulfur) 1993 128 diverse portfolio of energy assets, Turbine Engine Kerosene (Ultra Low Sulfur) 1223 128 including midstream, intrastate and (Jet Fuel or Jet A) 1863 128 interstate transportation and storage Gasoline 1203 128 assets. Energy Transfer operates more than 90,000 miles of natural DELAWARE & PHILADELPHIA COUNTIES ONLY: gas, crude oil, natural gas liquids and PRODUCTS/DOT GUIDEBOOK ID#/GUIDE#: PRODUCTS/DOT GUIDEBOOK ID#/GUIDE#: refined products pipelines and related Crude Oil 1267 128 Naphtha, Petroleum facilities, including terminalling, storage, Alkylate (Light Alkylate (Gasoline Components) 1255 128 fractionation, blending and various Naphtha and Benzene) 1203 128 Raffinate acquisition and marketing assets in 38 Butane (N-Butane) 1075 115 (Naphtha, solvent) 1256 128 states. Butane-Butylene 1075 115 Reformate Cat. Gasoline 1203 128 (Naphtha petroleum) 1255 128 • Intrastate Transportation and Storage Isobutane 1075 115 Udex Feed Operations – approximately 7,900 (Benzene-rich Reformate) 1255 128 miles of natural gas pipelines and three storage facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • ETP & SXL Project Summary
    ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY & ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS DISCLAIMER This presentation relates to a presentation the management of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (ETE) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP) will give to investors on September 7, 2016. At this meeting, members of the Partnerships’ management may make statements about future events, outlook and expectations related to Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP), Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (SXL), Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (PEPL), Sunoco LP (SUN), and ETE (collectively, the Partnerships), and their subsidiaries and this presentation may contain statements about future events, outlook and expectations related to the Partnerships and their subsidiaries all of which statements are forward-looking statements. Any statement made by a member of management of the Partnerships at this meeting and any statement in this presentation that is not a historical fact will be deemed to be a forward-looking statement. These forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events that members of management of the Partnerships believe to be reasonable, but these statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the Partnerships. While the Partnerships believe that the assumptions concerning these future events are reasonable, we caution that there are inherent risks and uncertainties in predicting these future events that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Partnerships and their subsidiaries to be materially different. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in the filings made by the Partnerships with the Securities and Exchange Commission, copies of which are available to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 8, 2014 Mr. Charles L. Dunlap Chief Executive Officer
    MAY 8, 2014 Mr. Charles L. Dunlap Chief Executive Officer TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP 1670 Broadway, Room 3100 Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: CPF No. 3-2013-5025 Dear Mr. Dunlap: Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of violation and specifies actions that need to be taken by TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP, to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. When the terms of the compliance order have been completed, as determined by the Director, Central Region, this enforcement action will be closed. Service of the Final Order by certified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing, or as otherwise provided under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Jeffrey D. Wiese Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety Enclosure cc: Ms. Linda Daugherty, Director, Central Region, OPS CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 __________________________________________ ) In the Matter of ) ) TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP, ) CPF No. 3-2013-5025 ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________) FINAL ORDER On October 1-5, 2012, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP (TransMontaigne or Respondent), in Missouri and Arkansas. The inspection covered the company’s Razorback Pipeline facilities in Missouri and Arkansas (Razorback Pipeline) and an examination of TransMontaigne records at the company’s offices in Rogers, Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • PES Holdings, LLC Enters Into Restructuring Support Agreement to Create Sustainable Financial Foundation
    1735 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 | 215 339 1200 www.pes-companies.com PES Holdings, LLC Enters Into Restructuring Support Agreement to Create Sustainable Financial Foundation Agreement Provides $260 Million in New Financing From Term B Lenders and Owners PES Expects to Complete Recapitalization Through Prepackaged Court Process While Continuing Operations Without Interruption Employee Pay and Benefits to Continue as Usual and Vendors to be Paid in Ordinary Course of Business Before and During Court Process Philadelphia, PA. (January 22, 2018) – PES Holdings, LLC (“PES Holdings” or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Philadelphia Energy Solutions LLC (“PES LLC”), announced today that it has entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (“RSA” or the “Agreement”) with the holders of 100% of the Company’s outstanding Term A debt and more than 90% of the Company’s outstanding Term B debt. In addition to restructuring existing debt and receiving relief from current debt service obligations, the Company has secured access to $260 million in new financing comprising $120 million in debtor-in-possession and exit financing, $75 million in additional capital from Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations L.P. (“Sunoco Logistics”) and a $65 million equity investment from existing equity holders, led by The Carlyle Group along with management and other partners. The recapitalized Company will have a stronger financial foundation to support operations amid continuing pressure on refining margins and soaring costs for merchant refiners associated with the purchase of Renewable Identification Numbers (“RINs”) to satisfy requirements under the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) established by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). The Agreement provides that the recapitalization will be completed pursuant to a proposed prepackaged restructuring (the “Restructuring”) through the filing of a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) for PES Holdings and affiliated subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven & I Holdings to Purchase Sunoco's Assets for $3.3Bn
    Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it 7-Eleven Owner Upgrades: Seven & i Holdings to Purchase Sunoco’s Assets for $3.3bn Seven & i Holdings Co Ltd. (TYO: 3382) – market cap as of 07/04/2017: ¥4.11tn ($37.0bn) Sunoco LP (NYSE: SUN) – market cap as of 07/04/2017: $3.38bn Introduction On April 6, 2017, the worldwide Japanese retail-store operator Seven & i Holdings Co. announced that it would acquire more than 1,000 gas stations and convenience stores owned by Sunoco LP in the U.S. for $3.3bn. The owner of the famous 7-Eleven chain’s acquisition of Sunoco was carried out in the light of the large potential which the company identifies in the U.S. market. About Seven & i Holdings Seven & i Holdings is a Japanese holding company founded in 2005 and headquartered in Tokyo. The company operates in the convenience stores, supermarket, and restaurant industries with 60,000 outlets spread out in 17 countries. With the acquisition of Sunoco, the company is now expanding its most famous brand, Seven- Eleven, throughout Japan and the US. The holding’s operating profit mainly derives from Convenience Store (86.3%), Superstore (2.1%), Department Store (1.1%), Food Services (0.3%) and Financial Services (14.1%), whereas the company’s Mail and Other Services and Corporate divisions contributed negatively to the overall EBIT by 2.4% and 3.0% respectively. The operating profitability of the company is clearly skewed towards the Convenience Store segment and this is further stressed by the breakdown of the projected capital investment plan (as of the FY2016 Annual Report): 7-Eleven Japan and - more importantly for the transaction analysed - 7-Eleven Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Sunoco Logistics and Sunoco Pipeline?
    ABOUT SUNOCO LOGISTICS AND THE MARINER EAST PROJECT Q: Who is Sunoco Logistics and Sunoco Pipeline? A: Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (SXL) is a publicly traded partnership that owns pipelines, terminals and other assets used in the purchase, transfer and sale of: • crude oil; • refined products such as gasoline, diesel and jet fuel; • natural gas liquids, such as propane, ethane and butane. Sunoco Logistics has approximately 8,000 miles of pipelines throughout the United States. Sunoco Pipeline L.P. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. with more than seven decades’ experience. Q: What is Mariner East? A: Mariner East is a pipeline infrastructure project in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Ohio and West Virginia to transport Marcellus/Utica shale natural gas liquids (NGLs) such as propane, ethane and butane, to the Marcus Hook Industrial Complex in Southeastern Pennsylvania and other access points for distribution to destinations in Pennsylvania and other domestic and international markets. The project has two phases: • Mariner East 1 is an underground pipeline project to transport 70,000 barrels a day of liquid propane and ethane from the Marcellus Shale region in Western Pennsylvania approximately 300 miles east to the Marcus Hook Industrial Complex in Marcus Hook, Pa. and Claymont, Del., where the products will be processed, stored, and sold to the local, regional, and international markets. Mariner East 1 utilizes mostly existing 8-inch diameter steel pipeline, except for 51 miles of new 12-inch diameter steel pipe between Washington County and Westmoreland County. • Mariner East 2 is a planned, approximately $2.5 billion new underground pipeline system, consisting of up to two pipelines approximately 350 miles in length, with origins in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sunoco Pipeline L.P
    Sunoco Pipeline L.P. ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER 137 FERC ~ 61,107 (2011} In this case, Sunoco Pipeline L.P. (Sunoco) filed a petition for a declaratory order seeking a decision by the Commission approving, among other things, a rate and priority of service structure for its Mariner West pipeline project that would move ethane from the Marcellus Shale formation production area to various markets. After a widely-publicized open season for all potential shippers, those shippers who executed transportation service agreements in which they committed to ship or pay a minimum amount of ethane (5,000 barrels per day) for a term extending through June 30, 2020, and who paid a premium that was at least $0.01 more than the rate charged uncommitted shippers, would not have their volumes subject to prorationing under normal operating conditions. Sunoco reserved 90 percent of capacity on the expansion for committed shippers and the balance, 10 percent for uncommitted shippers. The Commission granted the petition for declaratory order. ~V..&...&...I...&.V-:1: ..JV V V · · ~.&.'\.\,.,. ~ £-J· · \ V.&..&.V.L.L..&.'- ..&. U...&. } ..&...&.J V~j ~V..&...&. 137 FERC ~ 61,107 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. Sunoco Pipeline L.P. Docket No. OR11-22-000 ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER (Issued November 4, 2011) 1. On September 2, 2011, Sunoco Pipeline L.P. (Sunoco) filed a petition for a declaratory order approving: (1) priority service for Sunoco's proposed Mariner West ethane pipeline (Project); and (2) the overall tariff and rate structure for the Project.
    [Show full text]