DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1701.01531V3 [Q-Bio.QM] 14 May 2018 Theory 7 B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1701.01531V3 [Q-Bio.QM] 14 May 2018 Theory 7 B Control of Dynamics in Brain Networks Evelyn Tang Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104 Danielle S. Bassett Department of Bioengineering, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Department of Neurology, Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104 (Dated: May 16, 2018) The ability to effectively control brain dynamics holds great promise for the enhancement of cognitive function in humans, and the betterment of their quality of life. Yet, success- fully controlling dynamics in neural systems is challenging, in part due to the immense complexity of the brain and the large set of interactions that can drive any single change. While we have gained some understanding of the control of single neurons, the control of large-scale neural systems|networks of multiply interacting components|remains poorly understood. Efforts to address this gap include the construction of tools for the control of brain networks, mostly adapted from control and dynamical systems theory. Informed by current opportunities for practical intervention, these theoretical contri- butions provide models that draw from a wide array of mathematical approaches. We present recent developments for effective strategies of control in dynamic brain networks, and we also describe potential mechanisms that underlie such processes. We review ef- forts in the control of general neurophysiological processes with implications for brain development and cognitive function, as well as the control of altered neurophysiological processes in medical contexts such as anesthesia administration, seizure suppression, and deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. We conclude with a forward-looking discussion regarding how emerging results from network control|especially approaches that deal with nonlinear dynamics or more realistic trajectories for control transitions| could be used to directly address pressing questions in neuroscience. CONTENTS 1. Dynamical characteristics and clinical relevance 13 2. Structural drivers of synchrony: Graph I. Introduction 2 architecture and symmetries 13 B. The cost of controlling specific trajectories 14 II. How does the brain control itself? 3 C. Empirical tools for control of specific neural dynamics or pathways 16 III. Network control theory 4 A. Control of linear dynamics 4 VII. Emerging control methods with potential utility in B. Key driver nodes 4 neuroscience 16 C. Control energy and metrics 5 A. Broader control regimes 16 D. Application to brain networks 6 1. Nonlinear dynamics 16 2. Time-dependent control 17 IV. Understanding healthy brain function through control 3. Realistic control trajectories 17 arXiv:1701.01531v3 [q-bio.QM] 14 May 2018 theory 7 B. Exploiting system properties 18 A. Network control as a partial mechanism for cognitive 1. Compensatory perturbations or noise 18 control 7 2. Network topology 18 B. Network control and cognitive performance 8 C. Evolution of network control in development 9 VIII. Conclusion 19 D. Open questions in control and cognition 9 Acknowledgments 19 V. Targeting therapeutic interventions to maximize References 19 beneficial outcomes to patients 10 A. Anesthesia titration 10 B. Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease 10 C. Non-invasive transcranial stimulation 11 D. Seizure suppression in epilepsy 12 VI. Control of specific neural dynamics or pathways 13 A. Synchrony of neural populations 13 2 I. INTRODUCTION (Fornito and Bullmore, 2015; Sporns et al., 2005). Here we use the term \network" in the sense that is common The brain displays a wealth of complex dynamics in network science (Newman, 2010). A brain network is across various spatial and temporal scales (Betzel and a graph whose nodes represent units of the brain that Bassett, 2016; Kopell et al., 2014). From 302 neurons perform a specific function, like vision or audition (Bull- in the nematode worm C. elegans (Bentley et al., 2016; more and Bassett, 2011). At the large-scale, these units Varier and Kaiser, 2011) to some 86 billion neurons in may be several centimeters of tissue, while at the small the adult human (von Bartheld et al., 2016; Herculano- scale, these units may be individual neurons. In struc- Houzel et al., 2007), the units that drive brain func- tural brain graphs, the edges can represent structural tion are large in their number but even more compli- links such as fiber bundles at the large scale (Bassett cated in their interactions. Far from the canonical mod- et al., 2011; Hagmann et al., 2008) or synapses at the els in statistical mechanics stemming from either crys- small scale. In functional brain graphs, the edges rep- talline or random structure, the brain displays a hetero- resent synchronized dynamics that form functional links geneous pattern of interconnections (Bassett and Bull- (Achard et al., 2006; Stam, 2004) between these units. more, 2016; Castellana and Bialek, 2014; Fraiman et al., While both structural and functional links can be mea- 2009) that fundamentally constrains the propagation of sured directly from structural and functional data, re- activity. Understanding these dynamics remains of pri- spectively, extensive efforts have also sought to address mary interest in the field of neurophysics (Gao and Gan- the questions of (i) whether structural topology can be guli, 2015; Scott, 1977). An underlying assumption of inferred from functional traces (using, for example, struc- these investigations is that such dynamics or observed tural equation modeling), and (ii) whether functional neural activity can contain structure that forms represen- traces can be inferred from structural linkage patterns tations about incoming stimuli or underlying neural pro- (using, for example, neural mass models). Throughout cesses. An emerging and increasingly tractable avenue for this exposition, we will assume that structural links have understanding the mechanisms of these dynamics lies in been directly measured, rather than inferred. the notion of control, or how to effectively guide neural The use of the network formalism to probe brain dy- dynamics. How are brain dynamics controlled intrinsi- namics has a rich and pervasive heritage in seminal work cally in the awake, behaving animal? Can we harness at the intersection between physics and neuroscience. natural principles of control in neural systems to better One particularly impactful contribution was that of Hop- guide therapeutic interventions? field, who successfully connected dynamical processes to The increase in available experimental neurotechnolo- neural representations in an Ising model (Hopfield, 1982). gies (Chang, 2015; Nag and Thakor, 2016; Patil and States that minimized the energy function formed dy- Thakor, 2016), as well as more sophisticated compu- namical attractors and representations of memory. This tational tools (Glaser and Kording, 2016; Marblestone early contribution was extended and formalized by Amit et al., 2016) and theoretical models (Giusti et al., 2016), et al. (1985) and Gardner (1987), clearly demonstrat- has recently made it possible to tackle these questions ing the power of interacting networks in the modeling from fundamentally new angles. While at present there of complex neural processes. Here we expand the link is no comprehensive theory of control in the brain that between physics and neuroscience in the context of the we can refer to, the pursuit of such a theory remains network formalism by focusing on the control of brain critically important, having implications for our under- networks, enabling us to build a theoretical understand- standing of healthy neurophysiological processes, and our ing regarding biological processes and associated dynam- ability to intervene when those healthy processes go awry ics that occur across spatially distributed neural systems. in neurological disease and psychiatric disorders (Bassett In addition, strategies for intervention and control tar- and Khambhati, 2017; Chen et al., 2014; Johnson et al., gets can be designed through modeling dynamics in net- 2013). Several recent models propose new ways to control works of neurons or brain regions. Should the reader neural activity and neural rhythms, and further provide instead be searching for an excellent treatment of var- mechanistic insights into the rules by which brain dy- ious control methods for single neurons or for ensem- namics are (and can be) guided. Hence, it is timely to bles of neurons, we direct them to the recent textbook discuss these emerging developments, and to seek to tie by Schiff (2012), and to references therein. For further them together into a meaningful theoretical field that can details on emerging control technologies in the brain| be used to tackle current open questions in neuroscience especially invasive electrical and optical stimulation at and medicine. rapid timescales (milliseconds or below)|and associated Motivated by recent progress in understanding brain modelling approaches, please see the recent review by function from the perspective of interacting networks Ritt and Ching (2015). (Bassett and Bullmore, 2006, 2009; Bullmore and Sporns, The remainder of this Colloquium is organized as fol- 2012; Kaiser, 2011), we focus on systems-level control of lows. In Sec. II we draw inspiration for understanding either local neural circuits or whole-brain connectomes control of brain networks by considering how the brain 3 itself enacts intrinsic control. In particular, we briefly by proponents of connectionism (Medler, 1998), which discuss important
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neurological Emergencies.” Postgraduate Medical Journal
    “Should be read by those who decide initial management of neurological emergencies.” Postgraduate Medical Journal Since its birth as a series of articles in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry this book has moved into four editions, attesting to its lasting quality as an authoritative introduction to the major neurological emergencies. It is not just a basic reference for physicians, neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists in training. It has also become a standard text for emergency departments, with its N comprehensive yet concise discussions of immediate management. The conditions eurological covered are: ■ Medical coma ■ Cerebral infection ■ Traumatic brain injury ■ Acute spinal cord compression ■ Acute stroke ■ Acute neuromuscular respiratory ■ Delirium paralysis Neurological ■ Acute behaviour disturbances ■ Acute visual loss E ■ Tonic-clonic status epilepticus ■ Criteria for diagnosing brain mergencies ■ Raised intracranial pressure stem death Emergencies ■ Subarachnoid haemorrhage This edition has brought the book right up to date with emphasis on the evidence base for management, including reference to the relevant systematic reviews. With Fourth Edition the use of helpful summary boxes, this information – contributed by internationally respected leaders in their specialties – is quick to access in the clinical situation. Related titles from BMJ Books F The Epidemiology of Neurological Disorders ourth Edition Hughes Management of Neurological Disorders Neurological Investigations Edited by RAC Hughes Neurology and Medicine Stroke Units: an evidence based approach Neurology & Clinical Neurophysiology www.bmjbooks.com Neurological Emergencies Fourth edition Neurological Emergencies Fourth edition Edited by RAC Hughes Head, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK © BMJ Publishing Group 2003 BMJ Books is an imprint of the BMJ Publishing Group All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Specialisation in Neurophysics
    Master’s specialisation in Neurophysics Prof dr AJ van Opstal April 2020 https://www.ru.nl/opleidingen/master/neurophysics Master’s specialisation in Neurophysics This specialisation is part of the Master’s programme(s) in Physics and Astronomy It offers a flexible and interdisciplinary programme, which challenges you to unravel the workings of the most complex system known to us, the human and animal brain, using experimental, theoretical, and computational methods from the natural sciences. Focus: This a unique program in the Netherlands. We cover the full spectrum from behavioural studies with human subjects (psychophysics), computational studies of advanced brain models (neuroinformatics, computational neuroscience), to theoretical studies on intelligent systems and behaviour (machine learning, robotics, artificial intelligence, data science), and electrophysiological studies (the ‘hardware’) For whom: Students with a bachelor diploma in Physics, Science, but also Biomedical Engineering, Mathematics, or similar Master’s specialisation in Neurophysics “To understand ANY information-processing system, it has to be studied at three complementary levels, all equally necessary” (David Marr, ‘82): • L1: What is the function of the system? Why does it do what it does? What benefit does it acquire? Which problem (usually, for survival) does it solve? How does it do it? In Neuroscience, this is the research topic of Psychophysics (the goal) • L2: What is the optimal algorithm, computational principle, that underlies the observed behavior? Importantly, how can the system acquire such behavior through unsupervised learning? This is the field of Computational neuroscience and Machine Learning (the software…) • • L3: How are the algorithm(s) and behaviour(s) implemented in the system? In Neuroscience, this is the topic of Neurophysiology (the hardware…) The Neurophysics specialisation at DCN studies all three levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Mpi Cbs 2006–2007 12.28 Mb
    Research Report 2006/2007 Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Editors: D. Yves von Cramon Angela D. Friederici Wolfgang Prinz Robert Turner Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Stephanstrasse 1a · D-04103 Leipzig, Germany Phone +49 (0) 341 9940-00 Fax +49 (0) 341 9940-104 [email protected] · www.cbs.mpg.de Editing: Christina Schröder Layout: Andrea Gast-Sandmann Photographs: Nikolaus Brade, Berlin David Ausserhofer, Berlin (John-Dylan Haynes) Martin Jehnichen, Leipzig (Angela D. Friederici) Norbert Michalke, Berlin (Ina Bornkessel) Print: Druckerei - Werbezentrum Bechmann, Leipzig Leipzig, November 2007 Research Report 2006/2007 The photograph on this page was taken in summer 2007, During the past two years, the Institute has resembled a depicting the building works at our Institute. It makes the building site not only from the outside, but also with re- point that much of our work during the past two years gard to its research profile. On the one hand, D. Yves von has been conducted, quite literally, beside a building site. Cramon has shifted the focus of his work from Leipzig Happily, this essential work, laying the foundations for to the Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research in our future research, has not interfered with our scientific Cologne. On the other hand, we successfully concluded progress. two new appointments. Since October 2006, Robert Turner has been working at the Institute as Director There were two phases of construction. The first results of the newly founded Department of Neurophysics, from the merger of both Institutes and will accommo- which has already established itself at international lev- date two new Departments including offices and multi- el.
    [Show full text]
  • Causality in Cognitive Neuroscience: Concepts, Challenges, and Distributional Robustness
    Causality in cognitive neuroscience: concepts, challenges, and distributional robustness Sebastian Weichwald & Jonas Peters July 2020 While probabilistic models describe the dependence structure between ob- served variables, causal models go one step further: they predict, for example, how cognitive functions are aected by external interventions that perturb neur- onal activity. In this review and perspective article, we introduce the concept of causality in the context of cognitive neuroscience and review existing methods for inferring causal relationships from data. Causal inference is an ambitious task that is particularly challenging in cognitive neuroscience. We discuss two diculties in more detail: the scarcity of interventional data and the challenge of nding the right variables. We argue for distributional robustness as a guiding principle to tackle these problems. Robustness (or invariance) is a fundamental principle underlying causal methodology. A causal model of a target variable generalises across environments or subjects as long as these environments leave the causal mechanisms intact. Consequently, if a candidate model does not gen- eralise, then either it does not consist of the target variable’s causes or the under- lying variables do not represent the correct granularity of the problem. In this sense, assessing generalisability may be useful when dening relevant variables and can be used to partially compensate for the lack of interventional data. 1 Introduction Cognitive neuroscience aims to describe and understand the neuronal underpinnings of cog- arXiv:2002.06060v2 [q-bio.NC] 3 Jul 2020 nitive functions such as perception, attention, or learning. The objective is to character- ise brain activity and cognitive functions, and to relate one to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • EEG Signal Processing in Brain-Computer Interface
    EEG Signal Processing in Brain-Computer interface By Mohammad-Mahdi Moazzami A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Computer Science 2012 Abstract EEG Signal Processing in Brain-Computer interface By Mohammad-Mahdi Moazzami It has been known for a long time that as neurons within the brain fire, some measurable electrical activities is produced. Electroencephalography (EEG) is one way of measuring and recording of the electrical signals produced by these electri- cal activities via some sensor arrays across the scalp. Although there is plentiful research in using EEG technology in the fields of neuroscience and cognitive sci- ence and the possibility of controlling computer-based devices by thought signals, utilizing of EEG measurements as inputs to the control devices has still been an emerging technology over the past 20 years, current BCIs suffer from many prob- lems including inaccuracies, delays between thought, false positive detections, inter people variances, high costs, and constraints on invasive technologies, that needs further research in this area. The purpose of this research is to examine this area from Machine Learning and Signal Processing perspective and exploit the Emotiv System as a cost-effective, noninvasive and also a portable EEG measurement device, and utilize it to build a thought-based BCI to control the cursor movement. This research also assists the analysis of EEG data by introducing the algorithms and techniques useful in processing of EEG signals and inferring the desired actions from the thoughts. It also offers a brief future potential capabilities of research based on the platform provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical 23 (2019) 101923
    NeuroImage: Clinical 23 (2019) 101923 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage: Clinical journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynicl Acquisition of sensorimotor fMRI under general anaesthesia: Assessment of T feasibility, the BOLD response and clinical utility ⁎ Adam Kenji Yamamotoa,b, , Joerg Magerkurthc, Laura Mancinia,b, Mark J. Whitea,d, Anna Miserocchie, Andrew W. McEvoye, Ian Applebyf, Caroline Micallefb, John S. Thorntona,b, Cathy J. Priceg, Nikolaus Weiskopfg,h, Tarek A. Yousrya,b a Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom b Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom c UCL Psychology and Language Sciences, Birkbeck-UCL Centre for Neuroimaging, London, United Kingdom d Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom e Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom f Department of Neuroanaesthesia, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom g Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom h Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We evaluated whether task-related fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) BOLD (blood oxygenation fMRI level dependent) activation could be acquired under conventional anaesthesia at a depth enabling neurosurgery Anaesthesia in five patients with supratentorial gliomas. Within a 1.5 T MRI operating room immediately prior toneuro- Brain tumour surgery, a passive finger flexion sensorimotor paradigm was performed on each hand with the patients awake, Intra-operative and then immediately after the induction and maintenance of combined sevoflurane and propofol general an- Neurosurgery aesthesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroplasticity of Language in Left-Hemisphere Stroke: Evidence Linking Subsecond
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/075333; this version posted September 16, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Neuroplasticity of language in left-hemisphere stroke: evidence linking subsecond electrophysiology and structural connections Running title: Physiology of neuroplasticity of language Vitória Piai1,2, Lars Meyer3, Nina F. Dronkers2,4, Robert T. Knight1 Under review 1 Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, USA 2 Center for Aphasia and Related Disorders, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California, 94553, USA 3 Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1A, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 4 Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, 95817, USA Corresponding author Vitória Piai Radboud University Montessorilaan 3 6525 HR Nijmegen The Netherlands +31-24-3615497 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/075333; this version posted September 16, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 Abstract Our understanding of neuroplasticity following stroke is predominantly based on neuroimaging measures that cannot address the subsecond neurodynamics of impaired language processing. We combined for the first time behavioral and electrophysiological measures and structural- connectivity estimates to characterize neuroplasticity underlying successful compensation of language abilities after left-hemispheric stroke.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Establish a Neurophysics Group in the Department of Physics and Astronomy
    Proposal to Establish a Neurophysics Group in the Department of Physics and Astronomy Introduction The Department of Physics and Astronomy at the UR has had a long standing interest in the field of Biological Physics, represented by the research program of Prof. Robert Knox, a recipient of the 1994 Biological Physics Prize of the American Physical Society. Tom Foster, Prof. of Imaging Sciences in the Medical Center, received his Ph.D. from the Department as student of Prof. Knox, and has held a joint appointment in Physics and Astronomy since 1992. However since Prof. Knox’s retirement in 1997 the Department has had no primary appointment in Biological Physics. At the same time, the field of Biological Physics has experienced a period of rapid growth, with most leading Physics departments seeking to establish programs in this area. The 1997 report of the Department’s Faculty Recruiting Strategy Committee (FRS) concluded that there was a consensus in the Department in favor of a new recruitment in the field of Biological Physics. However, due to the constraints on Department size under the University’s Renaissance Plan, and the need to maintain strengths and balance in traditional core areas, only one full time position was projected for an effort in Biological Physics. In the Fall 1998, following the FRS report, a Committee to Explore the Future of Biological Physics was constituted. The Committee was charged with educating the Department about the field of Biological Physics, and in particular to consider the rationale for an appointment in Biological Physics within the Department of Physics and Astronomy, to investigate the environment for interdisciplinary activity in Biological Physics at the University, and to gauge the potential for the success and impact of such an appointment.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Signal Processing for Brain–Computer Interfaces
    INVITED PAPER Evolving Signal Processing for Brain–Computer Interfaces This paper discusses the challenges associated with building robust and useful BCI models from accumulated biological knowledge and data, and the technical problems associated with incorporating multimodal physiological, behavioral, and contextual data that may become ubiquitous in the future. By Scott Makeig, Christian Kothe, Tim Mullen, Nima Bigdely-Shamlo, Zhilin Zhang, and Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado, Senior Member IEEE ABSTRACT | Because of the increasing portability and wear- levels do not yet support widespread uses. Here we discuss the ability of noninvasive electrophysiological systems that record current neuroscientific questions and data processing chal- and process electrical signals from the human brain, automat- lenges facing BCI designers and outline some promising ed systems for assessing changes in user cognitive state, intent, current and future directions to address them. and response to events are of increasing interest. Brain– computer interface (BCI) systems can make use of such KEYWORDS | Blind source separation (BSS); brain–computer knowledge to deliver relevant feedback to the user or to an interface (BCI); cognitive state assessment; effective connectivity; observer, or within a human–machine system to increase safety electroencephalogram (EEG); independent component analysis and enhance overall performance. Building robust and useful (ICA); machine learning (ML); multimodal signal processing; BCI models from accumulated biological knowledge and
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Invasive BCI Through EEG an Exploration of the Utilization of Electroencephalography to Create Thought-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Boston College Computer Science Department Non-Invasive BCI through EEG An Exploration of the Utilization of Electroencephalography to Create Thought-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Senior Honors Thesis Daniel J. Szafir, 2009-10 Advised by Prof. Robert Signorile Contents List of Figures and Tables 1. Abstract 1 2. Introduction 2 1. Electroencephalography 2 2. Brain-Computer Interfaces 5 3. Previous EEG BCI Research 6 4. The Emotiv© System 9 1. Control Panel 11 2. TestBench 14 3. The Emotiv API 16 5. The Parallax Scribbler® Robot and the IPRE Fluke 17 6. Control Implementation 18 1. Emotiv Connection 19 2. Scribbler Connection 19 3. Decoding and Handling EmoStates 20 4. Modifications 23 7. Blink Detection 25 8. Conclusions 30 9. Acknowledgments 31 List of Figures and Tables Table 1: EEG Bands and Frequencies 4 Table 2: Emotiv SDKs 11 Table 3: Predefined Cognitiv Action Enumerator Values 22 Figure 1: Electrode Placement according to the International 10-20 System 4 Figure 2: Brain-Computer Interface Design Pattern 7 Figure 3: Emotiv EPOC Headset 10 Figure 4: The 14 EPOC Headset 14 contacts 10 Figure 5: Expressiv Suite 12 Figure 6: Affectiv Suite 13 Figure 7: Cognitiv Suite 14 Figure 8: Real-time EEG Measurements in TestBench 15 Figure 9: FFT Measurements in TestBench 15 Figure 10: High-level View of the Utilization of the Emotiv API 16 Figure 11: Scribbler Robot with IPRE Fluke add-on Board 17 Figure 12: High-level View of the Control Scheme 18 Figure 13: A Blink Event Highlighted in the AF3 Channel 25 Figure 14: One 10-second Segment with Blinks and Noise 26 Figure 15: Initial Neural Net Results 27 Figure 16: Twenty 10-second Recordings of AF3 Data 27 Figure 17: 1.6 Second Recording Showing a Blink Pattern 28 Figure 18: Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Exposes Naturally Occurring Blink Patterns 28 Figure 19: Fully Processed and Normalized Input to the Neural Network 29 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Neuroimaging- Phys 4710/6710/Neuro 6330 Course Credit: 3 Meeting Times/Place: TR 11:00 AM – 12:15 PM / Classroom South 528
    Course Title/Code: Functional Neuroimaging- Phys 4710/6710/Neuro 6330 Course Credit: 3 Meeting times/place: TR 11:00 AM – 12:15 PM / Classroom South 528 Course Objectives Neuroimaging is a rapidly developing multidisciplinary field with new possibilities of understanding the brain both in health and disease. Functional neuroimaging tools, such as fMRI and EEG, aim to provide valuable insights into brain structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. This course is suitable for students with an interest in using neuroimaging tools. The objective of this course is to help students understand (i) the principles, potential and limitations of brain imaging techniques, (ii) the relationship of neurophysiology and brain imaging data (iii) the experimental design principles and basic data analysis methods, and (iv) how brain imaging techniques are applied to answer questions in cognitive neuroscience. Course materials • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Huettel, Song, and McCarthy • Articles from Scholarpedia and Other scientific Journals (Available from Pubmed /GSU subscription) Instructor Dr. Mukesh Dhamala Office: Science Annex, Room #456 Phone: (404) 413-6043 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/dhamala/dhamala.html Office hours: Tuesday afternoon, or by appointment Grading Final Grade= 40%(Homework)+30%(Class Quiz)+30%(Final Project/Presentation) Letter Grades: A= 4.0, A-, B+, B= 3.0, B-, C+, C=2.0, C-, D=1.0, F =0.0 (x+/- =x +/-0.33) Grade scale: > 90 (A), > 80 (B), >70 (C), >60 (D), <60 (F) Final Project Presentation December 12, 2013 (10:45AM to 1:15AM) Disability Services Students who wish to request accommodation for a disability may do so by registering with the Office of Disability Services of a signed Accommodation Plan and are responsible for providing a copy of that plan to instructors of all classes in which an accommodation is sought.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzsaki G. Rhythms of the Brain.Pdf
    Rhythms of the Brain György Buzsáki OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Rhythms of the Brain This page intentionally left blank Rhythms of the Brain György Buzsáki 1 2006 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2006 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Buzsáki, G. Rhythms of the brain / György Buzsáki. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13 978-0-19-530106-9 ISBN 0-19-530106-4 1. Brain—Physiology. 2. Oscillations. 3. Biological rhythms. [DNLM: 1. Brain—physiology. 2. Cortical Synchronization. 3. Periodicity. WL 300 B992r 2006] I. Title. QP376.B88 2006 612.8'2—dc22 2006003082 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To my loved ones. This page intentionally left blank Prelude If the brain were simple enough for us to understand it, we would be too sim- ple to understand it.
    [Show full text]