DOCSLIB.ORG

Sun Prairie Village County Source Water Delineation and Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sun Prairie Village County Source Water Delineation and Assessment Sun Prairie Village County Water and Sewer District Public Water System PWSID # MT0000521 SOURCE WATER DELINEATION AND ASSESSMENT REPORT Date of Report: 06/03/2005 Contact Person: Bobby Broadway Sun Prairie Village County Water and Sewer District Post Office Box 1127 Great Falls, MT 59403 Phone: (406) 965-3944 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................8 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................10 PURPOSE..............................................................................................................................................................................10 LIMITATIONS .....................................................................................................................................................................10 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................................................11 THE COMMUNITY .............................................................................................................................................................11 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING....................................................................................................................................................11 GEOLOGY............................................................................................................................................................................12 THE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY .........................................................................................................................................13 WATER QUALITY ..............................................................................................................................................................14 SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE WATER QUALITY...................................................................................................................14 DELINEATION.......................................................................................................................................................................15 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................15 AQUIFER GEOMETRY AND HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS ...............................................................................16 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE..........................................................................................................................................17 CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND ASSUMPTIONS ...............................................................................................................18 WELL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................................................18 METHODS AND CRITERIA...............................................................................................................................................19 DELINEATION RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................................19 LIMITING FACTORS ..........................................................................................................................................................19 INVENTORY...........................................................................................................................................................................20 INVENTORY RESULTS/RECHARGE REGION ...............................................................................................................22 INVENTORY UPDATE .......................................................................................................................................................22 INVENTORY LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................................22 SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................................23 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................................................25 MONITORING WAIVERS....................................................................................................................................................27 MONITORING WAIVER REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................................................27 USE WAIVERS ....................................................................................................................................................................27 WAIVER RECOMMENDATION........................................................................................................................................27 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................................28 GLOSSARY* ...........................................................................................................................................................................30 APPENDICES..........................................................................................................................................................................34 APPENDIX A: SITE LAYOUT............................................................................................................................................35 APPENDIX B: WELL LOGS ...............................................................................................................................................37 APPENDIX C: WATER USE STATISTICS........................................................................................................................43 APPENDIX D: CONCURRENCE LETTER........................................................................................................................45 FIGURES FIGURE 1. SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNTY VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2. SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNTY PWS WELL LOCATIONS FIGURE 2A. AERIAL MAP OF THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE PWS VICINITY i FIGURE 3. SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE AREA GEOLOGY FIGURE 3A. SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE GEOLOGY (CONTINUED) FIGURE 4. POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE NEAR SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE SUPPLY WELLS FIGURE 5. SUNPRAIRIE VILLAGE INVENTORY REGION FIGURE 6. SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE RECHARGE REGION FIGURE 7. LAND COVER IN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE INVENTORY REGION FIGURE 8. SEPTIC DENSITY WITHIN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE INVENTORY REGION FIGURE 9. LAND COVER IN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE RECHARGE REGION FIGURE 10. SEPTIC DENSITY WITHIN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE RECHARGE REGION Tables TABLE 1. CLIMATIC SUMMARY FOR GREAT FALLS, MONTANA (243749) .........................................................12 TABLE 2. WELL CONSTRUCTION AND PUMPING RATES FOR SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE SUPPLY WELLS......14 TABLE 3. SOURCE WATER SENSITIVITY CRITERIA..................................................................................................15 TABLE 4. POROSITY VALUES FOR VARIOUS GEOLOGIC MATERIALS (EPA 1993). ...........................................16 TABLE 5. SOURCE WELL INFORMATION FOR THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE PWS .............................................18 TABLE 6. SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES IN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE PWS INVENTORY REGION........................................................................................................................................................21 TABLE 7. DETERMINATION OF HAZARD OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES FOR UNCONFINED WELLS..................................................................................................................................................................................23 TABLE 8. RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPECIFIC CONTAMINANT SOURCES AS DETERMINED BY HAZARD AND THE PRESENCE OF BARRIERS.............................................................................................................24 TABLE 9. HAZARD OF SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES FOR THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE PWS INVENTORY REGION AND RECHARGE REGION ............................................................................24 TABLE 10. SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT FOR SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES IN THE SUN PRAIRIE VILLAGE INVENTORY REGION AND RECHARGE REGION. ..................................................24 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sun Prairie Village is located in north-central Montana about 10-miles west of the City of Great Falls, and about 1-mile north of the Sun River in Cascade County. Drinking water for the Sun Prairie Village County Water and Sewer District (Sun Prairie Village) Public Water System (PWS) is supplied by four wells located in Section 34, Township 21 North, Range 2 East. This Source Water Delineation and Assessment Report was prepared under the requirements and guidance of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the US Environmental Protection Agency, as well as a detailed Source Water Assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vegetation and Fire at the Last Glacial Maximum in Tropical South America
    Past Climate Variability in South America and Surrounding Regions Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research VOLUME 14 Aims and Scope: Paleoenvironmental research continues to enjoy tremendous interest and progress in the scientific community. The overall aims and scope of the Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research book series is to capture this excitement and doc- ument these developments. Volumes related to any aspect of paleoenvironmental research, encompassing any time period, are within the scope of the series. For example, relevant topics include studies focused on terrestrial, peatland, lacustrine, riverine, estuarine, and marine systems, ice cores, cave deposits, palynology, iso- topes, geochemistry, sedimentology, paleontology, etc. Methodological and taxo- nomic volumes relevant to paleoenvironmental research are also encouraged. The series will include edited volumes on a particular subject, geographic region, or time period, conference and workshop proceedings, as well as monographs. Prospective authors and/or editors should consult the series editor for more details. The series editor also welcomes any comments or suggestions for future volumes. EDITOR AND BOARD OF ADVISORS Series Editor: John P. Smol, Queen’s University, Canada Advisory Board: Keith Alverson, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), UNESCO, France H. John B. Birks, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Norway Raymond S. Bradley, University of Massachusetts, USA Glen M. MacDonald, University of California, USA For futher
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP) Preparation of a Feasibility Study for National Heritage Area Designation for the Upper Missouri River Area
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Preparation of a Feasibility Study for National Heritage Area Designation for the Upper Missouri River Area Upper Missouri River Heritage Area Planning Corporation, Inc. PO Box 1323 Great Falls, MT 59403 Tel. (406) 454-6814, Chairman Jane Weber Table of Contents Section Page A. UMRHAPC Mission 1 B. UMRHAPC Themes 1 C. UMRHAPC Proposed Boundary 1 D. Purpose and Description of Services 2 E. Scope of Work 2 F. Minimum Qualifications for Bidders 6 G. Proposal Requirements 6 1. Letter of Interest 6 2. Table of Contents 6 3. Statement of Qualifications 6 4. Technical Approach/Work Plan 7 5. References 7 6. Required Attachments 7 7. Cost Proposal 7 H. General Information 7 1. Time Schedule 7 2. Contact for Questions 8 3. Selection Criteria 8 4. Proposal Evaluation Process 8 5. Scoring System 9 6. Submission of Proposal 10 7. Notice to Proceed/Contract Amendments 11 8. Disposition of Proposals 11 Attachments 1. Required Attachment Checklist A-1 2. Bidder Technical Approach/Work Plan A-2 3. Bid/Bidder Certification Sheet A-3 4. Cost Proposal Worksheet A-4 5. Bidder References A-6 6. Non-Disclosure Statement A-8 Addendums 1. Addendum 1: Map of the Proposed NHA Addendum 1 2. Addendum 2: Proposed Themes for the NHA Addendum 2-7 ________________________________________________________ RFP for Feasibility Study: Upper Missouri River NHA Designation July 2017 Page 1 of 11 INTRODUCTION The Upper Missouri River Heritage Area Planning Corporation, Inc. (UMRHAPC) is seeking qualified consultants to prepare a Feasibility Study in compliance with National Park Service (NPS) standards to demonstrate to Congress the national significance of the Upper Missouri River Area landscape and its worthiness for designation as a National Heritage Area (NHA).
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher L. Hill
    CHRISTOPHER L. HILL EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D., Institute for the Study of Earth and Man, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Dissertation: Archaeological and Pleistocene Geology of Acheulian and Middle Paleolithic Sites in the Bir Tarfawi Region of the Southern Egyptian Sahara. Chair: Fred Wendorf. 1989 M.A., Institute for the Study of Earth and Man, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. 1982 B.A., University of Minnesota, Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota. Interdisciplinary Studies: Geology, Archaeology and Anthropology. Senior Thesis: Paleoecology of the Cloquet River Basin: Geomorphology and Environmental Change in Northeastern Minnesota. Advisor: George Rapp. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE 2017-Present Program Director, National Science Foundation • Program policies and procedures, long-range planning and budget development. • Management of merit review, award, declination, post-award processes. • Coordination and collaboration with NSF Programs, other Federal agencies and organizations. • Programs: - Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), - Graduate Research Internship Program (GRIP), - EHR Core Research (ECR Working Group, STEM workforce development), - Non-Academic Research Internships for Graduate Students (INTERN), - Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER, Program Officer, Working Group). • Selected Panels, Working Groups, Site Visit Teams: - Growing Convergence Research (CGR, NSF Big Ideas, Working Group/Steering Committee), - NSF Research Traineeship Program (NRT, Panel Manager), - Building Capacity in STEM
    [Show full text]
  • I LEYSON TURCK
    THINGS TALKED ABOUI ALL AO3UT THAT GOAT. OWye WS DSW$.- THlE SUTTE OFFICE A cm sm eND gne lawt a sess ths Paw S.AYS HE'S STILL CHIEF Grn d numiemi .ntcrtainhmenm and bail ANDERSON & CRUTHERS. Ot ds $TAWDARDo I.1bl Chk . n, KnmtDavkk club on Moeayl .mmg I Ahearn rekuderh of Ow IlaushfletX 3. a by Anaeonda and BIDtr.r Mllch 1.-Tbh.s eee o D. H lU T. tswqr. Tds~pl.. C m ni tem - P. S111 a s Albs Depl- Ladle Lerics' wcbsswa. Tickets BLACKSMITH NO e C.a, the East Pak masset pewOarIeb. S.~.mil in Ia. L. e-aruet whb re-sle te snoaes 60 Use W UIl.Il No%'s go knowlng thaUn to have been stolen, ear Look outa for tLs Nikired line. plaet almost the senLse tinme of thue Mahan He Therefore Demands His Salary k Linsle'. STUART. - - Mont. *What People are Sayng About enernt S ed. (oasnt Atorsney and is the Spring eetilen appeased or she pramseeltism and su Deterbmied to Oo to As to the Onmo H~dld of Merleds 6 Holarn for thn the Courts if Neooesary Case. defence. Considerable Interest was anw to Oet It. Ifetesd by the eidtaes in the ease eanl h- the ldan' teto court room was Ilted with aspetsor. al WLtttaw re. Special oneawsm•see ot the tanai. thrauglrut Sthetral. Intmeas in thesars Blr'rc, MAGUIRE'S OPERA UTTiE RAiLWAY GUIDZ. March 1. Tme city of lautt, pre- TT*.~ McOMr HOUSE 1.--The city eaetion is Wirre, Marbh was ehmncedal h the fact that tbh de ctets the anomaly having LOUIS irst in April.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations of Glacial Lake Musselshell
    EXTENT AND TIMING OF LAURENTIDE GLACIAL LAKE MUSSELSHELL, CENTRAL MONTANA by Nicole Kristina Davis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana July 2004 © COPYRIGHT by Nicole Kristina Davis 2004 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Nicole Kristina Davis This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the College of Graduate Studies. Dr. William W. Locke Approved for the Department of Earth Sciences Dr. David R. Lageson Approved for the College of Graduate Studies Dr. Bruce McLeod iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Nicole K. Davis July 15, 2004 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support, advice and patience of a great number of people. Roger Colton, Dave Fullerton, and Bill Johnson from the US Geological Survey were especially helpful and provided materials and information that were central to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Ice Age Helped Shape Montana Go to the Following Web Site: Name
    How the Ice Age Helped Shape Montana Go to the following web site: http://formontana.net/base.html name: A. Click on the link titled MISSOURI RIVER. 1. On the map shown on the web site, what does the solid (not dashed) red line mark the location of? 2. What is unusual about the Milk River Valley from Havre to Nashua? (This unusual feature suggests that the valley w as not formed by the Milk River.) 3. The Missouri used to flow northeast toward Canada’s Hu dson Bay. Now it flows through the Dakotas, emptying into the Mississippi River near St. Louis. Explain w hat caused the change? 4. Click on the Hot Link titled “*Compare the Map to an image that shows topography”. Which valley is wider? Circle one. a. The pre-ice age Missouri Valley from Big Sandy to Havre b. The present valley of the Missouri southeast of Big Sandy B. Click on RETURN TO BASE CAMP. Then click on the link titled HI-LINE. 5. How do geologists know that the rock in the photo was not formed in north-central Montana? 6. Rocks like this one from Canada can be seen scattered throughout north -central Montana. Why aren’t rocks from Canada found south of the Missouri River? 7. What river’s valley is marked #4 on the photo? C. Click on RETURN TO BASE CAMP. Then click on the link titled STRIATIONS. 8. Explain how a glacier caused the striations shown in this photo. 9. What do the scratches help geologists figure out? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Western Area Christopher L
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Department of Anthropology Presentations 1-1-2006 Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Western Area Christopher L. Hill Boise State University This document was originally published in Handbook of North American Indians. Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Western Area CHRISTOPHER L. HILL The geologic framework for western North America consists late 1800s (Chamberlin 1894). The possibility that this of physical landscapes (geomorphic features) and strati­ inland route was a migration route was suggested (W.A. graphic sequences that can be used to provide a basis for Johnston 1933:22, 42). Years before the advent of radio­ understanding the chronologic and environmental context carbon dating, Antevs (l935a:302) suggested that people for Late Pleistocene human populations. The Western Area first "spread along on the eastern foot of the Rockies where includes the region of North America from the Pacific coast an ice-free corridor had formed some 20,000 to 15 ,000 to the Rocky Mountains and parts of the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau (figs. 1-2). The Late Pleistocene geology of western North America has been significantly influenced by global-scale changes in climate. For instance, much of the northern part of the region was covered by glaciers of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet, and glaciers were also present in the southern part of the Western Area, from the Sierra Nevada bordering the west side of the Great Basin to the southern Rocky Mountains (fig. 2). Besides the consequences of the extent and timing of glacial advance and melting for the presence of land­ scape-habitats available for biotic communities, changes in climate and local geologic processes influenced the rela­ tive sea level along the Pacific coast and the availability of terrains.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration and Management Options for Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge
    AN EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR BENTON LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Prepared For: U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION 6 DENVER, COLORADO BY: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO Vanessa L. Fields U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge Great Falls, MT Michael J. Artmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6 Division of Planning Denver, CO Leigh H. Fredrickson Wetland Management and Education Services, Inc. Puxico, MO Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 09-01 DECEMBER 2009 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., V. L. Fields, M. J. Artmann, L. H. Fredrickson 2009. An evaluation of ecosystem restoration and management options for Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Denver, CO. Greenbrier Wetland Services Publication 09-01. Blue Heron Conservation Design and Printing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: Mike Artmann, Karen Kyle, Frank Nelson Cover photos by Karen Kyle Design & Printing by Blue Heconservationron design and printing LLC ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1 THE HISTORIC BENTON LAKE ECOSYSTEM ...............................................3 GEOLOGY, SOILS, TOPOGRAPHY ....................................................... 3 CLIMATE AND HYDROLOGY ...............................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Central Area Christopher L
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Department of Anthropology Presentations 1-1-2006 Geologic Framework and Glaciation of the Central Area Christopher L. Hill Boise State University This document was originally published in Handbook of North American Indians. Geological Framework and Glaciation of the Central Area CHRISTOPHER L. HILL During the Late Pleistocene, the Laurentide ice sheet correlation. Starting in the 1950s chronometric techniques, extended over the western interior Plains and Great chiefly radiocarbon dating, were applied to test the devel­ Lakes region in the central region of North America. This oping framework. This led to the abandonment and reor­ central area generally encompasses the northwestern inte­ ganization of much of the earlier terminology (Willman rior Plains of North America, extending from the Rocky and Frye 1970). For example, the Iowan, Tazewell, Cary, Mountains in the west to the western Great Lakes and and Mankato Wisconsin glaciations were all placed into Hudson Bay in the east (figs. 1-2). It includes parts of the the Woodfordian. The Woodfordian substage is followed Mackenzie River, Missouri River, and Mississpippi River systems. Deglaciation of this region led to the development of landscapes that were inhabited by Rancholabrean faunal communities including human groups. Three major ice centers formed in North America: the Labrador, Keewatin, and Cordilleran. The Cordilleran covered the region from the Pacific Ocean to the eastern front of the Rocky Mountains ("Geological Framework and Glaciation of the Western Area," this vo!.) while the Labrador and Keewatin ice fields combined to form the Laurentide Ice Sheet. The glacial geology of the central region of North America includes evidence of the lobes and sublobes of the Keewatin ice as well as lobes from the Labrador ice source that expanded from the Lake Superior and Lake Michigan basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Naturalist May Be Reproduced in Part Or in Whole Without the Written Consent of the Publisher
    NaturalistMONTANA Spring/Summer 2007 Fabulous Fishing Birds Spring’s First Color Missouri Magic Birds and Bees see Get Outside Guide, page 9 TO PROMOTE AND CULTIVATE THE APPRECIATION, UNDERSTANDING AND STEWARDSHIP OF NATURE THROUGH EDUCATION inside Spring/Summer 2007 NaturalistMONTANA Features 4 Osprey Fabulous fishing birds cope with urban living 4 13 Yellow is the Color of Spring A botanist observes patterns in early blooms Departments Tidings 3 7 7 Community Focus Finding different ways to express the beauty of nature 9 Get Outside Guide Birds and bees, naturalist Special notes, things to do, nature Pull-Out calendar Section 9 13 14 Far Afield Elements of Missouri River magic 16 Imprints Meet the director, Summer Discovery Day Camps, thank you notes, kid stuff 18 Magpie Market 14 19 Reflections “Twin Fawns,”by Charles Finn. Illustrations by Gabrielle Sivitz 16 Cover photo – Bobcat babies, taken by Neil Chaput de Saintonge, co-founder of the Rocky Mountain School of Photography (www.rmsp.com). No material appearing in Montana Naturalist may be reproduced in part or in whole without the written consent of the publisher. All contents © 2007 The Montana Natural History Center. 2 MONTANA NATURALIST SPRING/SUMMER 2007 tidings 120 Hickory Street Missoula, MT 59801 (406) 327-0405 [email protected] he season of awakening and renewal is upon www.MontanaNaturalist.org us. And with generous financial fertilizer from members and other community supporters, Executive Director we’ve produced a bumper crop of T Chickadee Arnie Olsen opportunities for outdoor discovery this spring and Photo courtesy Eugene Beckes summer at the Montana Natural History Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Nk Signature of the Eeper of the National Register Date NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES |j|AR 0 4 199 MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM X New Submission Amended Submission A Name of Multiple Property Listing Whoop-Up Trail of Northcentral Montana B. Associated Historic Contexts 1. The Whiskey Trade of Northcentral Montana, 1865-1880 2. Establishment of Mercantile Capitalism in Northcentral Montana, 1865-1890 C Form Prepared By name/title: Dr. Margaret Kennedy organization: University of Lethbridge, Canada date: July 12, 1991 street & number: 4401 University Blvd. telephone: (403) 329-2225 city or town: Lethbridge state: Alberta, Canada zip code: T1K 3M4 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1 966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official l Date MONTANA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE __________ State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. __ __ nk Signature of the eeper of the National Register Date NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No.
    [Show full text]