DOCSLIB.ORG

Doc 00033976.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doc 00033976.Pdf This Bulletiп has Ьееп prepared bv Р. J. Маsоп (Great Britaiп) оп behalf of the British Natioпal Committee оп Large Dams for the Committee оп Materials for Coпcrete Dams Origiпal text iп Eпglish - Freпch traпslatioп Ьу R. Chadwick, revised Ьу У. Le Мау EXPOSURE OF DAM CONCRETE ТО SPECIAL AGGRESSIVE WATERS. Guidelines. Commission Internationale des Grands Barrages 151, bd Haussmann, 75008 Paris - Те!. : 40 42 67 33 - Пlех : 641320 F (ICOLD) NOTICE – DISCLAIMER : The information, analyses and conclusions referred to herein are the sole responsibility of the author(s) thereof. The information, analyses and conclusions in this document have no legal force and must not be considered as substituting for legally-enforceable official regulations. They are intended for the use of experienced professionals who are alone equipped to judge their pertinence and applicability and to apply accurately the recommendations to any particular case. This document has been drafted with the greatest care but, in view of the pace of change in science and technology, we cannot guarantee that it covers all aspects of the topics discussed. We decline all responsibility whatsoever for how the information herein is interpreted and used and will accept no liability for any loss or damage arising therefrom. Do not read on unless you accept this disclaimer without reservation. COMM ITTEE O N MATERIALS FOR CONCRETE DAMS (*) ( 1983-1989) Chairman BERTACCHI ltaly Р. Members W. PAC ELLI DE ANDRADE Brazil J.-P. GARBE France М. W. С. WILLIAMS Great Britain J. TABATABAI Iran Т. YANAGIDA Japan С. GOMEZ-TOLEDO Mexico 1. BOERSETH Norway Е. F. PIM ENTEL MACHADO Portugal С. HALLIER South Africa Р. А. Sweden А. ENGELBREKTSON Switzerland G. TRUCCO USA J. R. GRAHAM USSR А. D. OSIPOV Yugoslavia М. С ALOGOVIC (*) Membersbip in March 1989 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD 1. INTRODUCТION 2. TYPES OF АТТАСК 3. PLACES OF HIGH RISK 4. WATER ANALYSES 5. DELETERIOUS EFFECTS 6. PREVENТIVE MEASURES 7. INVESТIGAТIONS АТ EXIST­ ING DAMS 8. REMEDIAL WORKS 9. REFERENCES APPENDIX А - Case histories APPENDIX В - Codes and standards 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................ 13 1. INTRODUCТION .................................................... ...................................................... 15 1.1. Scope of the Bulletin .. .. .... ............ .......... .. .. .. .... .. ......... ....... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .... .... ... ... 15 1.2. Extent and Nature of the ProЫem .. .... .. ...... .. .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... ... .... .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. 15 1.3. Purpose of the Bul\etin .......................................................................................... 15 2. TYPES OF АТТАСК ................................ ........................................................ ............. 17 2.1. Soft Water ................................................................................................................ 17 2.2. Sulphates 19 2.3. Sulphides 21 2.4. Chlorides ..................... ............................................................................................. 21 2.5. Acids .......................................................................................................................... 23 2.6. Plant Growth .... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ...... .... ..... ... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .......... .. .. .... .. .......... .... .. .... .. .. 25 2.7. Combined Attacks ........................................................ ......................................... 25 3. PLACES OF HIGH RISK ............................................................................................ 29 3.1. General ...................................................................................................................... 29 3.2. Geographical Location ............................................................................................ 29 3.2.1. Mountain or Нigh Moorland Water ............................. ............................. 29 3.2.2. Low Moorland or Marsh Water ............................................... ................. 29 3.2.3. lgneous and Siliceous Geology .................................................................. 29 3.2.4. Natural Sulphate Rich Areas ...................................................................... 31 3.2.5. Natural Sulphide Rich Areas .............................................. ........................ 31 3.2.6. Contaminated Ground and Waste Products ... ......................................... 31 3.2.7. Seawater ........................................................................................................ 33 3.2.8. Deposits of Marine Origin .......................................................................... 33 3.3. Structural Locations ................................................................................................ 33 3.3.1. Potential Flow Paths ....................................................................... ............. 33 3.3.2. Areas with Reinforcement or Embedded Parts ........................................ 35 3.3.3. Highways .............................................................................. :......................... 37 3.3.4. Unventilated Galleries ...... ............................ .............................................. 37 3.3.5. Pump Sumps and Relief Drains ............... ................................................. 37 3.3.6. Plant Growth ................................................................................................ 39 4. WATER ANALYSES ...................................................................................................... 43 4. 1. Basic Requirements and Definitions .................................................................... 43 4.1.1. Ion Content ........ ............................ .................................... .......................... 43 4.1 .2. рН .................................................................................................. ................ 43 4.1.3. Alkalinity or Acidity ....................................................... ............................. 45 4.1 .4. Hardness ....................... ..... .......................................................... ................. 45 4.1.5. Dissolved Carbon Dioxide .......................................................................... 45 4.1.6. Total Dissolved Solids ................................................... ............................. 47 4.1 .7. Saturation Index ............ .............................................................................. 47 4. 1.8. Temperature .......... ..................... .................................................................. 47 4.1 .9. Electrical Conductivity ................................................................................ 47 5 4.2. Assessing Aggressivity due to Soft Water Leaching ............ .... ................. .. 47 4.2.1. Dissolved Carbon Dioxide .......... .......................... .. .. ............ .. .......... .. .... 4 7 4.2.2. Simple Testing ............................ .. .......... ................ .. .. ............ .. ... ... 49 4.2.3. Saturation or Langelier Index .... .............................................. ................. 49 4.3. Sulphates .......................................... .................... ...................... ..................... 51 4.4. Sampling Technique .............................. .......... .......... .. .................... ............ ............ 51 4.5. Aggression Level Classification .............................. ................... ... ........ ............ 53 5. DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ........................................ ........................................ 73 5.1. Loss of Strength . ..................................... ...................... ................. ....................... 73 5.2. Increased Drainage Flows . .. ................. ............................................ ..................... 73 5.3. Increased Uplift ...................................................................................................... 73 5.4. Reduced Cohesion .................................................................................................. 75 5.5. Corrosion of Reinforcement .................................................. ............................... 75 5.6. Hydraulic Effects .......................... ........................ ...................... ..................... 75 5.7. Appearance . ......................... ................................................................................... 77 5.8. Gas Pockets .......................... ........ .. .................. ........ ...................... .. ................ ........ 77 6. PREVENТIVE MEASURES .................................................................... .................. 79 6.1. Introduction .................. ............................ ........................ .. .. .................. .......... .. 79 6.2. Concrete Mix Design ..... ................... ... ............. .......... .. .. .... .............. .. ............ .. .. 79 6.2.1. Aggregate .................... .... .............................................. .. .............. .. ............ 79 6.2.2. Cements .......... .................... .. ................ .......................... .. .. .............. .. ............ 79 6.2.3. Water/Cement Ratio ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment
    Cumbria County Council Draft Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment October 2014 Cumbria County Council Table of contents Chapter Page(s) Glossary of Acronyms 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Purpose of a Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 4 1.3 Requirement for a Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 5 1.4 Summary of the key WFD Objectives 6 1.5 Other legislation 8 2. Cumbria LFRMS 9 2.1 Overview of the study area 9 2.2 Timescale 10 2.3 Objectives of the Cumbria LFRMS 11 2.4 WFD Preliminary Screening 11 2.5 Water bodies and how they are classified 14 2.6 Water quality data for the River Basin Districts 15 3. WFD Assessment 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 WFD Objectives 17 3.3 Testing the LFRMS against WFD Objectives 18 3.4 Pressures on the water environment 20 4. Conclusion 26 5. References 27 Figures 1 Designated conservation sites in Cumbria 8 2 Cumbria County Council administrative area 9 3 Named water bodies wholly or partially within the Cumbria LFRMS area 12 4 River Basin Districts in Cumbria 16 5 WFD assessment objectives 18 6 High level WFD assessment 19 7 Pressures on the water environment 20 8 Assessment of the Cumbria LFRMS measures and actions 21 Glossary of Acronyms AWB Artificial Water Bodies BAU Business as Usual LDNP Lake District National Park EU European Union LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority FWMA Flood and Water Management Act 2010 LFRMS Local Flood Risk Management Strategy GCS Good Chemical Status RBMP River Basin Management Plan GEP Good Ecological Potential SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest GES Good Ecological Status SAC Special Area of Conservation HMWB Heavily Modified Water Bodies SPA Special Protection Area WFD Water Framework Directive Serving the people of Cumbria Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • RR 01 07 Lake District Report.Qxp
    A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake District and adjacent areas Integrated Geoscience Surveys (North) Programme Research Report RR/01/07 NAVIGATION HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT Bookmarks The main elements of the table of contents are bookmarked enabling direct links to be followed to the principal section headings and sub-headings, figures, plates and tables irrespective of which part of the document the user is viewing. In addition, the report contains links: from the principal section and subsection headings back to the contents page, from each reference to a figure, plate or table directly to the corresponding figure, plate or table, from each figure, plate or table caption to the first place that figure, plate or table is mentioned in the text and from each page number back to the contents page. RETURN TO CONTENTS PAGE BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT RR/01/07 A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the District and adjacent areas Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2004. D Millward Keywords Lake District, Lower Palaeozoic, Ordovician, Devonian, volcanic geology, intrusive rocks Front cover View over the Scafell Caldera. BGS Photo D4011. Bibliographical reference MILLWARD, D. 2004. A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake District and adjacent areas. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/01/07 54pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex G Water Framework Directive Assessment Pdf 1991Kb
    Cumbria County Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment March 2015 Cumbria County Council Table of contents Chapter Page(s) Glossary of Acronyms 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Purpose of a Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 4 1.3 Requirement for a Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 5 1.4 Summary of the key WFD Objectives 6 1.5 Other legislation 8 2. Cumbria LFRMS 9 2.1 Overview of the study area 9 2.2 Timescale 10 2.3 Objectives of the Cumbria LFRMS 11 2.4 WFD Preliminary Screening 11 2.5 Water bodies and how they are classified 14 2.6 Water quality data for the River Basin Districts 15 3. WFD Assessment 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 WFD Objectives 17 3.3 Testing the LFRMS against WFD Objectives 18 3.4 Pressures on the water environment 20 4. Conclusion 26 5. References 27 Figures 1 Designated conservation sites in Cumbria 8 2 Cumbria County Council administrative area 9 3 Named water bodies wholly or partially within the Cumbria LFRMS area 12 4 River Basin Districts in Cumbria 16 5 WFD assessment objectives 18 6 High level WFD assessment 19 7 Pressures on the water environment 20 8 Assessment of the Cumbria LFRMS measures and actions 21 Glossary of Acronyms AWB Artificial Water Bodies LDNP Lake District National Park BAU Business as Usual LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority EU European Union LFRMS Local Flood Risk Management Strategy FWMA Flood and Water Management Act 2010 RBMP River Basin Management Plan GCS Good Chemical Status SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest GEP Good Ecological Potential SAC Special Area of Conservation GES Good Ecological Status SPA Special Protection Area HMWB Heavily Modified Water Bodies SuDS Sustainable Drainage System WFD Water Framework Directive Serving the people of Cumbria Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kendal Fellwalkers Programme Summer 2015 Information From: Secretary 01539 720021 Or Programme Secretary 01524 762255
    Kendal Fellwalkers Programme Summer 2015 Information from: Secretary 01539 720021 or Programme Secretary 01524 762255 www.kendalfellwalkers.co.uk Date Grade Area of Walk Leader Time at Starting Point Grid Time Kendal Ref. walk starts 05/04/2015 A Mardale round (Naddle, Margaret 08:30 Burnbanks NY508161 09:10 Kidsty Pike, Wether Hill) Lightburn (16mi 4300ft) B Murton Pike, High Cup Nick, Ken Taylor 08:30 Murton CP NY730220 09:40 Maize Beck, Scordale (13mi 3000ft) C Kirkby Malham, Gordale Chris Lloyd 08:30 Verges at Green Gate 09:30 Scar, Malham Tarn (10mi (near Kirkby Malham) 1600ft) SD897611 12/04/2015 A The Four Passes (14mi Chris Michalak 08:30 Seathwaite Farm 09:45 6000ft) NY235122 B Grange Fell, High Spy, Janet & Derek 08:30 Layby on B5289 N of 09:35 Maiden Moor, lakeshore Capper bridge, Grange-in- (11.5mi 3700ft) Borrowdale NY256176 C White Gill, Yewdale Fells, Dudley 08:30 Roadside beyond 09:15 Wetherlam, Black Sails (8mi Hargreaves Ruskin Museum 2800ft) SD301978 19/04/2015 A Staveley to Pooley Bridge Conan Harrod 08:30 Staveley (Wilf's CP) 08:45 (Sour Howes, Ill Bell, High SD471983 Street) (21.5mi 5100ft) (Linear walk. Please contact leader in advance.) B Three Tarns (Easdale, Stickle, Steve Donson 08:30 Layby on A591 north of 09:10 Lingmoor) and Silver How Swan Inn, Grasmere (13mi 4600ft) NY337086 C Bowscale Fell, Bannerdale Alison Gilchrist 08:30 Mungrisdale village hall 09:20 Crags, Souther Fell (7mi NY363302 2000ft) 26/04/2015 A Lingmell via Piers Gill, Jill Robertson 08:30 Seathwaite Farm 09:45 Scafell Pike, Glaramara (12mi
    [Show full text]
  • The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation 5.1 an Overview
    R2R 06 26/10/09 08:45 Page 96 5 The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation 5.1 An Overview Bronze Age ring cairns in Britain function would appear to have been for ceremonies Ring cairns are ceremonial monuments that were con- or rituals, sometimes connected with burial, which structed in the upland areas of Britain in the Bronze involved the spreading or burial of charcoal and Age, between about 2,000 and 1,000 BC. Examples are burnt soil. known from Dartmoor, Wales, the Pennines and Scot- The ceremonial function of ring cairns is also land and investigations have revealed both common suggested by their association with other monuments features and some regional variation. and their location in the landscape. Many ring cairns In its most simple form the ring cairn is a are situated within or close to barrow cemeteries (for monument comprising a generally circular bank of example, in Wales) or adjacent to stone circles (for stones with diameters ranging from as little as 3 example, in north east Scotland). Many are positioned metres up to about 30 metres, enclosing a flat central so that there are spectacular landscape views from the area. The stone banks are usually between 1.5 and site, but conversely the monuments themselves are 3 metres wide and up to 0.5 metres high. They are not easy to see from a distance. There is also an unlikely to have been much higher when originally association with water, which is known to have constructed. Sometimes a kerb of large stones was strong ritual or ceremonial significance in the Bronze placed on the inside or outside edges of the bank Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Body Administered by the Natural Environment Research Council, As the Institute of Freshwater Ecology (IFE)
    Published work on freshwater science from the FBA, IFE and CEH, 1929-2006 Item Type book Authors McCulloch, I.D.; Pettman, Ian; Jolly, O. Publisher Freshwater Biological Association Download date 30/09/2021 19:41:46 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/22791 PUBLISHED WORK ON FRESHWATER SCIENCE FROM THE FRESHWATER BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 1929–2006 Compiled by IAN MCCULLOCH, IAN PETTMAN, JACK TALLING AND OLIVE JOLLY I.D. McCulloch, CEH Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK Email: [email protected] I. Pettman*, Dr J.F. Talling & O. Jolly, Freshwater Biological Association, The Ferry Landing, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP, UK * Email: [email protected] Editor: Karen J. Rouen Freshwater Biological Association Occasional Publication No. 32 2008 Published by The Freshwater Biological Association The Ferry Landing, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP, UK. www.fba.org.uk Registered Charity No. 214440. Company Limited by Guarantee, Reg. No. 263162, England. © Freshwater Biological Association 2008 ISSN 0308-6739 (Print) ISSN 1759-0698 (Online) INTRODUCTION Here we provide a new listing of published scientific contributions from the Freshwater Biological Association (FBA) and its later Research Council associates – the Institute of Freshwater Ecology (1989–2000) and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (2000+). The period 1929–2006 is covered. Our main aim has been to offer a convenient reference work to the large body of information now available. Remarkably, but understandably, the titles are widely regarded as the domain of specialists; probably few are consulted by administrators or general naturalists.
    [Show full text]
  • R2R 01 26/10/09 07:59 Page X R2R 01 26/10/09 07:59 Page 1
    R2R 01 26/10/09 07:59 Page x R2R 01 26/10/09 07:59 Page 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Why Study the Duddon? This may come as news to you if you don’t know the features, at least for those of us who know and love it. Lake District, or only visit occasionally, but this jewel It is probably one of the least-visited parts of the Lake of the English countryside is far from natural, despite its District, being well off the standard tourist trail, and astounding beauty and its status as an icon of the lacking in most modern amenities (apart from an Romantic Movement. In fact, it is a cultural landscape, excellent pub and a small village shop cum post and it has been extensively altered by human hands office). For that reason, it has perhaps received less over about 10,000 years since we first moved in after scrutiny than some others, although we know that the last Ice Age. These many changes have been from before the time of Wordsworth there has been a softened by the passage of time, which probably steady stream of lucky visitors. Perhaps more impor- explains why some people do not see them. They tantly, parts of the valley have already received some range from wholesale upheavals of the various habitats archaeological investigation, notably by the National (such as removal of ancient forests), through extensive Trust, and the records left by these surveys showed that quarrying and mining scars, down to construction of the Duddon might be rich in further marks of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Kedal Fellwalkers Summer Programme 2003
    Kendal Fellwalkers Programme Summer 2014 Information from: Secretary 01539 734766 or Programme Secretary 01524 762255 www.kendalfellwalkers.co.uk G Date r Area of Walk Leader Time at Starting Point Grid Time a Kendal Ref. walk d e starts 06/04/2014 A Black Crag, Holme Fell, John Jennings 08:30 Elterwater free CP 09:10 Wetherlam, Pike of Blisco, NY329051 Lingmoor (16mi 6000ft) B Green Crag, Harter Fell, Stony John Nash 08:30 Birker Moor (Devoke 09:30 Tarn (13mi 3800ft) Water junction) SD171977 C Greenburn Circuit (Helm Crag, Tony George 08:30 Layby on A591 north of 09:10 Calf Crag, Steel Fell) (8.5mi Swan Inn, Grasmere 2900ft) NY337086 13/04/2014 A Corpse Road, Branstree, Tarn Tim Lilley 08:30 Mardale Head CP 09:30 Crag, Grey Crag, Shipman Knotts, NY469107 Harter Fell (15mi 4800ft) B Wet Sleddale, Branstree, Swindale Steve Douglas 08:30 Wet Sleddale Dam 09:05 (13 mi 3000ft) NY555115 C Skiddaw, Sale How (10mi 3400ft) Derek Capper 08:30 Blencathra Centre 09:30 NY302257 20/04/2014 A White Maiden, Caw, White How, John Jennings 08:30 Fell Gate, Walna Scar CP 09:20 Green Crag, Harter Fell, Levers SD289970 Hause (16mi 5800ft) B Wether Hill, Loadpot Hill, Ken Taylor 08:30 Helton, grass verges W of 09:15 Bonscale Pike, Arthur's Pike village NY497214 (12.5mi 2200ft) C Burney Fell, Blawith Knott, John Wilkinson 08:30 Grizebeck, CP opposite 09:20 Woodland (11mi 1500ft) Greyhound Inn SD238850 27/04/2014 A Cam Crag, Glaramara, Scafell Jill Robertson 08:30 Stonethwaite NY262137 09:40 Pike, Corridor Route (14mi 4900ft) B Whernside and Great Coum (13mi
    [Show full text]
  • Scrambles In
    Scrambles in the Lake District – South Scrambles in the Lake District – South About the Author John Fleetwood has lived in the Lake District for over 20 years, and over Langdale, Coniston, Eskdale, that time he has developed an intimate knowledge of the area. John loves exploring and has sought to visit every potential crag in the area Patterdale and High Street to find new routes, some of which have been included in this guide. He is a keen runner, photographer and mountaineer and was the first person to complete the Bob Graham, Ramsay and Paddy Buckley rounds in winter, as well as being a previous winner of the FRA Long by John Fleetwood Distance Award. In 2015, John traversed the Alps in a self-supported trip taking in 60 summits over 1850km. He has climbed and walked in South America, China, Iceland, Norway and the European Alps as well as Britain. When not in the hills, John runs a sustainable investment ratings company. Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, Cumbria LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk © John Fleetwood 2021 First edition 2021 ISBN: 978 1 78631 045 3 Contents This book replaces the second edition of Scrambles in the Lake District – South Map key .................................................................... 7 by Brian Evans (ISBN 9781852848316) Overview map .............................................................. 8 Foreword ................................................................... 9 Printed in China on responsibly sourced paper on behalf of Latitude Press Ltd. Preface ....................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Bothy Welcome Folder
    Welcome to Woodend We welcome you to your stay at Woodend and hope it will be a memorable one. Please bear in mind that we are situated within a working sheep and cattle farm. Other than the field that we own (further information on Page 6 and 20), the farm fields are out of bounds to guests and dogs. If you haven’t yet found our website, then please check it out at www.woodendhouse.co.uk as there is useful information on things to do in the area. Please read the notes which follow - they're important and we hope you'll find them useful and informative. We pride ourselves in combining comfortable and cosy accommodation within a quiet relaxing environment and we aim to provide everything you are likely to need for your stay. If you have any problems during your stay then we will try our best to resolve them but please remember, we can only help if you ask, so please don’t put up with something that you are unhappy with and only tell us on your return home! The origins of Woodend go back to the 16th century and being located high on Birker Fell you have incredible views, (weather permitting), towards Scafell Pike, Crinkle Craggs and Bowfell. We hope that you enjoy your break and will return. The Cottage - Woodend Page 1 Contents General Parking 5 Rubbish & Recycling 7 Information Smoking 5 Pets 9 Walking 5 The Farm 10 Breakages & Damage 10 Services Heating 11 Bulbs and Batteries 16 Multi-fuel Stove 11 Telephone 16 Logs 13 Outside Lights 16 Water 14 Television 17 Shower 14 Sky Remote 17 Bathing 14 Fuse box 19 The Kitchen 15 USB Charging
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to the Impacts of Climate Change on the Natural Environment: the Cumbria High Fells
    Character Area Climate Change Project NE115R Responding to the impacts of climate change on the natural environment: The Cumbria High Fells First published 31 March 2009 www.naturalengland.org.uk The Cumbria High Fells © Natural England (Ian Crosher) Maredale Ill Bell Natural England Project Manager - Andy Neale, Natural England, John Dower House, Crescent Place, Cheltenham, GL50 3RA Natural England Local Contact - Ian Crosher, Natural England, Agricola House, Cowper Road, Gilwilly Trading Estate, Penrith, Cumbria, CA11 9BN Keywords - Climate Change, Character Areas, biodiversity, landscape Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.naturalengland.org.uk. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0845 600 3078 or e-mail [email protected] Climate Change Impact Assessment and Response Strategy Cumbria High Fells Character Area Summary Introduction Natural England is working to deliver a natural environment that is healthy, enjoyed by people and used in a sustainable manner. However, the natural environment is changing as a consequence of human activities, and one of the major challenges ahead is climate change. Even the most optimistic predictions show us locked into at least 50 years of unstable climate. Changes in temperature, rainfall, sea levels, and the magnitude and frequency of extreme weather events will have a direct impact on the natural environment. Indirect impacts will also arise as society adapts to climate change. These impacts may create both opportunities and threats to the natural environment. Natural England and its partners need to plan ahead to secure the future of the natural environment. One way in which we are doing this is through the Character Area Climate Change Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope Newsletters 16
    SCOPE NEWSLETTER NUMBER TWENTYPIVE DECEMBER 1997 AUSTRALIA p.2 ITALY p.S DARLING RIVER ALGAL BLOOMS ALTERNATING AEROBIC AND A three year project was carried out in the ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS TO Darling River at Bourke, the geographical INCREASE PHOSPHATE REMOVAL centre of the well-documented 1991 algal FROM W ASTEWATER bloom. The purpose was to study whether Traditional wastewater treatment plants do not nutrients or other factors were limiting algal exceed P efficiencies of 30%. The Phostrip, growth Bardenpho and A/0 processes, recently developed and implemented in sewage plants AUSTRALIA p.2 have substantially improved this P recovery. THE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT This paper, focusing on A/0, describes the SUPPORT SYSTEM (CMSS) - A PILOT optimisation of this process in a laboratory­ STUDY IN THE MURRUMBIDGEE scaled single basin, by alternating sequences of CMSS, a decision support system, was aerobic and anaerobie phases. developed for the Murrumbidgee catchment, (81 948km2). The simple computer program NETHERLANDS p.6 needs neither a technical nor computing HIGH NUTRIENT REMO VAL IN THE background to set-up. This pilot study THREE-SLUDGE SEWAGE TREATMENT demonstrated the application of the system to a This three stage concept combines a high­ specifie area as an initial phase prior to its loaded activated sludge plant plus a settler for application to major catchments in New South the biological removal of P, with two biofilm Wales. reactors for nitrification and denitrification (by adding a carbon source). A pilot unit (2-3p.e.) IRELAND p.3 showed that sufficient residence time for PHOSPHORUS LOSS FROM SOIL TO bacteria activity was critical in P removal (to WATER lmg/1) but that N reactors were relatively flow This book, published following an insensitive.
    [Show full text]