DOCSLIB.ORG

The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation 5.1 an Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation 5.1 an Overview R2R 06 26/10/09 08:45 Page 96 5 The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation 5.1 An Overview Bronze Age ring cairns in Britain function would appear to have been for ceremonies Ring cairns are ceremonial monuments that were con- or rituals, sometimes connected with burial, which structed in the upland areas of Britain in the Bronze involved the spreading or burial of charcoal and Age, between about 2,000 and 1,000 BC. Examples are burnt soil. known from Dartmoor, Wales, the Pennines and Scot- The ceremonial function of ring cairns is also land and investigations have revealed both common suggested by their association with other monuments features and some regional variation. and their location in the landscape. Many ring cairns In its most simple form the ring cairn is a are situated within or close to barrow cemeteries (for monument comprising a generally circular bank of example, in Wales) or adjacent to stone circles (for stones with diameters ranging from as little as 3 example, in north east Scotland). Many are positioned metres up to about 30 metres, enclosing a flat central so that there are spectacular landscape views from the area. The stone banks are usually between 1.5 and site, but conversely the monuments themselves are 3 metres wide and up to 0.5 metres high. They are not easy to see from a distance. There is also an unlikely to have been much higher when originally association with water, which is known to have constructed. Sometimes a kerb of large stones was strong ritual or ceremonial significance in the Bronze placed on the inside or outside edges of the bank Age. and the flat central area often contains small pits Ring cairns are often confused with other remains filled with charcoal and other material such as sherds and vice versa. Erosion or robbing of other types of of pottery. In some cases cremation burials were sites such as burial or clearance cairns can cause placed in the centre of ring cairns, often in pottery confusion and the simple circular layout and often vessels under small mounds. However excavation crude construction of the ring cairn can often be con- has suggested that burial was not their primary fused with stone-walled sheep bields or shepherds’ function and if it did take place, it was after the ring bothies. cairn had been in use for some time. Their primary 96 R2R 06 26/10/09 08:45 Page 97 The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation | 97 Ring cairns in the Lake District including additional examples around Seathwaite Tarn. Ring cairns have been recognised in the Lake District The ring cairns in the high Lake District fells for some time and the Lake District Historic Environ- display many of the characteristics of ring cairns ment Record (HER) currently holds records for some elsewhere in Britain but also have some charac- 118 sites within the National Park. Some of these are teristics which may be unique to the group. The likely to be misidentified, but equally there may be first is their distribution which is as single, isolated other sites recorded as bields or hut circles which may sites or in groups of similar monuments. Two of the in fact be ring cairns. largest groups are found to the southeast of Stickle The Lake District ring cairns appear to fall into Tarn in the Langdale Fells and around Seathwaite two broad groups. The first and larger group are Tarn in the Duddon Valley. The individual sites are located on the lower fells, up to about 250 metres scattered widely throughout the central fells. above sea level and are associated with a variety of Another possible local characteristic is the other types of monuments. Some are located close to juxtaposition in some cases of a larger ring cairn with clearance cairnfields (e.g. on Stockdale Moor and a much smaller satellite ring cairn. The two excavated Heathwaite Fell) while others are associated with examples at Lead Pike are an example of this. A small other ceremonial monuments such as standing stones number of sites, including the larger ring cairn at Lead and funerary cairns (e.g. Askham Fell). Pike and another on the northwest side of Seathwaite The second, smaller group of Lake District ring Tarn, also have extensions or annexes added to their cairns are located much higher in the fells, up to southeast sides. heights of 500 metres or more above sea level and Although many ring cairns are located so as to have these sites tend to be isolated or associated only with spectacular views, this is particularly apparent with the other ring cairns. sites in the Lake District fells. Here the emphasis The sites in this second group, presently numbering appears to be on views to prominent summits of just over 40, were identified by Peter Rodgers, a adjacent fells. Examples include ring cairns in the retired Area Manager for the Lake District National Langdale valley with specific views to Pike of Stickle; Park Authority. Peter identified some of these sites a ring cairn on Armboth Fell with a clear view to the while working for the LDNPA and since his summit of Helvellyn; and the larger ring cairn at Lead retirement he has devoted much time to scouring the Pike, Seathwaite Tarn, which is positioned so that an high fells for further examples. He has single-handedly observer standing in the centre of the cairn can view defined a discrete class of prehistoric monument in the the summit of Harter Fell through a gap in an adjacent Lake District which had barely been recognised before rock outcrop (Photo 66). he started his fieldwork. His discoveries included the A further characteristic of the location of many of two ring cairns at Lead Pike, Seathwaite Tarn, which the Lake District sites is a very close association with were excavated as part of the R2R project. water, including tarns and becks. Many of the Peter has played an important role in the R2R individual ring cairns were constructed close to project, helping the survey teams to identify a number running water, and often in the higher reaches or near of new ring cairn sites in the Duddon Valley, the source of becks running down the fellside. Others, R2R 06 26/10/09 08:45 Page 98 98 | Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation Photo 66 The larger ring cairn at Lead Pike, Seathwaite Tarn, with view to the summit of Harter Fell through a gap in an adjacent rock outcrop such as the Lead Pike sites, were positioned closely annular or pennanular rings of stone to a large boulder adjacent to small tarns, some of which have now dried (see Chapter 6). This is sometimes the case with the up or developed into peat bog. However the clearest smaller, satellite ring cairns. During the excavation of examples of this phenomenon are the sites that are the larger ring cairn at Lead Pike, it was found that part located around larger tarns filling glacial corries in the of the circuit of the cairn bank comprised large earth- high fells. These include the groups at Stickle and fast boulders. Other ring cairns appear to surround Seathwaite Tarns and individual examples at Levers natural peat covered mounds. Water and Low Water in the Coniston Fells. Another clear indication of the importance of the The excavations at Lead Pike, Seathwaite Tarn natural environment and natural features is the frequent incorporation of large earth-fast boulders in In 2003 Peter Rodgers had reported the majority of the banks of ring cairns, or the attaching of small his discoveries of ring cairns to the National Park R2R 06 26/10/09 08:45 Page 99 The Seathwaite Tarn Ring Cairns Excavation | 99 Authority archaeologists and discussions had begun discussions that took place in 2005 between the regarding further possible research. Although some LDNPA and the Duddon Valley Local History Group similar monuments had been excavated both within that led to the development of the Ring Cairns to and adjacent to the Lake District, it was quickly Reservoirs project. A second major season of realised that the group of ring cairns in the Lake excavation was subsequently undertaken in July 2007 District high fells formed a discrete sub-group and that as part of the R2R project. This was co-directed by there was no clear indication of their date or function. John Hodgson (National Park Senior Archaeologist) The LDNPA archaeologists therefore decided to and Alastair Vannan (Oxford Archaeology North). mount a small trial excavation of a ring cairn in order The excavation team comprised over 30 volunteers to provide information to answer these basic ques- from the Duddon Valley Local History Group and a tions. The large ring cairn at Lead Pike, Seathwaite group of five students from Durham University. Tarn, was chosen because it displayed characteristics typical of the group (that is, it had a small satellite cairn, Description of the excavations a deliberate positioning with a view to a summit peak, proximity to water and it formed part of the significant The ring cairns at Lead Pike are located on a low grouping around Seathwaite Tarn). It was also rela- promontory of land surrounded on three sides by peat tively easy to access via the reservoir track and pollen bog that is often covered in standing water. The analysis of samples from sediments in Seathwaite Tarn monuments comprise a large ring cairn (Cairn 1), in the 1960s had provided some basic information with an adjacent satellite cairn to the west (Cairn 2) about the vegetational history of the general area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scheduled Ancient Monuments List
    List of Scheduled Ancient Monuments North Ayrshire (excluding Arran) PARISH MONUMENT Ardrossan : Ardrossan Castle Boydstone Braes, motte Montfode Burn, motte Montfode Castle Beith : Cuffhill Plantation, long cairn Dalry : Aitnock, dun, Hindog Glen Fairlie : Castle Hill, earthwork SSE of Glenside. Fairlie Castle. Southannan Mansionhouse. Irvine : Seagate Castle. Lawthorn Mount, mound. Kilbirnie : Glengarnock Castle Kilwinning : Kilwinning Abbey Waggonway and bridge, SE of Saugh Trees Clonbeith Castle Largs : Castle Hill, fort. Hailie House, chambered cairn. Knock Jargon, cairn and fort. Knock, fort. Outerwards, Roman fortlet. Skelmorlie Aisle and Largs Old Parish Church. Little Cumbrae : Little Cumbrae Castle. Little Cumbrae, lighthouse tower and associated buildings. PARISH MONUMENT Portencross : Auld Hill, fort. Portencross Castle. West Kilbride : Blackshaw Quarry, cup and ring marked rock, 320m south of. Bushglen Mount, ENE of Bushglen. Castle Knowe, motte Stevenston : Ardeer Recreation Club, subterranean passage and cave. Kerelaw Castle Listed of Scheduled Ancient Monuments Isle of Arran Grid Ref. MONUMENT Prehistoric Ritual and Funerary 4433 69 NR978250 Aucheleffan, stone setting 550 NW of 393 69 NR890363 Auchencar, standing stone 90023 69 NR892346 * Auchengallon, cairn, 150m WSW of. 4601 69 NS044237 Bealach Gaothar, ring cairn 700m NW of Largybeg 4425 69 NR924322- Bridge Farm, stone settings 500m NNW and 1040m NW of 69 NR919325 90051 69 NR990262 * Carn Ban, chambered cairn 5962 69 NR884309 Caves, S. of King's Cave. 395 69 NR949211 Clachaig, chambered cairn 396 69 NS026330 Dunan Beag, long cairn and standing stone, Lamlash 397 69 NS 028331 Dunan Mor, chambered cairn, Lamlash 3254 69 NR993207 East Bennan, long cairn 4903 69 NS018355 East Mayish, standing stone 100m ESE of 4840 69 NS006374- Estate Office, standing stones 500m NE of 69 NS007374 398 69 NS0422446 Giant’s Graves, long cairn, Whiting Bay 90186 69 NR904261- Kilpatrick, dun, enclosure, hut circles, cairn and field system 69 NR908264 1km S of.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Releases Tight Ends and Offensive Linemen to Be Named Finalists for the ‘Nfl 100 All-Time Team’
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Alex Riethmiller – 310.840.4635 NFL – 12/9/19 [email protected] NFL RELEASES TIGHT ENDS AND OFFENSIVE LINEMEN TO BE NAMED FINALISTS FOR THE ‘NFL 100 ALL-TIME TEAM’ 18 Offensive Linemen and 5 Tight Ends to be Named to All-Time Team Episode 4 of ‘NFL 100 All-Time Team’ Airs on Friday, December 13 at 8:00 PM ET on NFL Network Following the reveal of the defensive back and specialist All-Time Team class last week, the NFL is proud to announce the 40 offensive linemen (16 offensive tackles; 15 guards; 9 centers) and 12 tight ends that are finalists for the NFL 100 All-Time Team. 39 of the 40 offensive linemen finalists have been enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The 12 finalists at tight end include eight Pro Football Hall of Famers and combine for 711 career receiving touchdowns. Episode three will also reveal four head coaches to make the NFL 100 All-Time Team. The NFL100 All-Time Team airs every Friday at 8:00 PM ET through Week 17 of the regular season. Rich Eisen, Cris Collinsworth and Bill Belichick reveal selections by position each week, followed by a live reaction show hosted by Chris Rose immediately afterward, exclusively on NFL Network. From this group of finalists, the 26-person blue-ribbon voting panel ultimately selected seven offensive tackles, seven guards, four centers and five tight ends to the All-Time Team. The NFL 100 All-Time Team finalists at the offensive tackle position are: Player Years Played Team(s) Bob “The Boomer” Brown 1964-1968; 1969-1970; 1971- Philadelphia Eagles; Los Angeles 1973 Rams; Oakland Raiders Roosevelt Brown 1953-1965 New York Giants Lou Creekmur 1950-1959 Detroit Lions Dan Dierdorf 1971-1983 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Origins of Great Easton, Leicestershire: Commumity Archaeology Meets the ‘Big Dig’
    INVESTIGATING THE ORIGINS OF GREAT EASTON, LEICESTERSHIRE: COMMUMITY ARCHAEOLOGY MEETS THE ‘BIG DIG’. Nicholas J. Cooper and Vicki Score On Sunday June 22nd 2003, the inhabitants of Great Easton in the Welland Valley, in southeast Leicestershire, together with professional archaeologists from the University of Leicester and Channel 4’s Time Team, undertook a one-day field work investigation to try to establish the origins of their village and to chart its subsequent development. In conjunction with geophysical survey, a total of 41 metre-square test pits and two machine-excavated trenches were opened up across the village and dug to a maximum depth of 0.6m or until archaeology or natural was encountered (Fig. 1). Pits 14, 23, 35 & 44 were not excavated. Although most of the archaeological features recorded were modern (with the notable exceptions of a late Roman or Early Anglo-Saxon cobbled surface from Test Pit 3 and medieval plot boundaries in Trench 40) the artefactual material from the investigation has added considerably to the existing body of knowledge gathered by the Great Easton Fieldwork Group (Burningham and Wallis 2004, Fig. 1) over the last 20 years. This, along with more recent developer-funded opportunities, allows us to trace this focus of settlement back to the Roman period or later Iron Age (Fig. 2). Analysis of the pottery assemblage and its distribution has confirmed and complemented the findings of earlier work, which suggested the existence of a Roman period settlement (probably with an Iron Age antecedent), in the north- eastern part of the village, on higher ground around the church and immediately to the north in Lount’s Crescent.
    [Show full text]
  • My 214 Story Name: Christopher Taylor Membership Number: 3812 First Fell Climbed
    My 214 Story Name: Christopher Taylor Membership number: 3812 First fell climbed: Coniston Old Man, 6 April 2003 Last fell climbed: Great End, 14 October 2019 I was a bit of a late-comer to the Lakes. My first visit was with my family when I was 15. We rented a cottage in Grange for a week at Easter. Despite my parents’ ambitious attempts to cajole my sister Cath and me up Scafell Pike and Helvellyn, the weather turned us back each time. I remember reaching Sty Head and the wind being so strong my Mum was blown over. My sister, 18 at the time, eventually just sat down in the middle of marshy ground somewhere below the Langdale Pikes and refused to walk any further. I didn’t return then until I was 28. It was my Dad’s 60th and we took a cottage in Coniston in April 2003. The Old Man of Coniston became my first summit, and I also managed to get up Helvellyn via Striding Edge with Cath and my brother-in-law Dave. Clambering along the edge and up on to the still snow-capped summit was thrilling. A love of the Lakes, and in particular reaching and walking on high ground, was finally born. Visits to the Lakes became more regular after that, but often only for a week a year as work and other commitments limited opportunities. A number of favourites established themselves: the Langdale Pikes; Lingmoor Fell; Catbells and Wansfell among them. I gradually became more ambitious in the peaks I was willing to take on.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistoric Burial Sites of Northern Ireland
    The Prehistoric Burial Sites of Northern Ireland Harry and June Welsh Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 006 8 ISBN 978 1 78491 007 5 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress, H and J Welsh 2014 Cover photo: portal tomb, Ballykeel in County Armagh All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by CMP (UK) Ltd This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Background and acknowledgements ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 A short history of prehistoric archaeology in northern ireland ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Northern ireland’s prehistory in context....................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Classifications used in the inventory............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment
    Cumbria County Council Draft Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment October 2014 Cumbria County Council Table of contents Chapter Page(s) Glossary of Acronyms 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Purpose of a Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 4 1.3 Requirement for a Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 5 1.4 Summary of the key WFD Objectives 6 1.5 Other legislation 8 2. Cumbria LFRMS 9 2.1 Overview of the study area 9 2.2 Timescale 10 2.3 Objectives of the Cumbria LFRMS 11 2.4 WFD Preliminary Screening 11 2.5 Water bodies and how they are classified 14 2.6 Water quality data for the River Basin Districts 15 3. WFD Assessment 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 WFD Objectives 17 3.3 Testing the LFRMS against WFD Objectives 18 3.4 Pressures on the water environment 20 4. Conclusion 26 5. References 27 Figures 1 Designated conservation sites in Cumbria 8 2 Cumbria County Council administrative area 9 3 Named water bodies wholly or partially within the Cumbria LFRMS area 12 4 River Basin Districts in Cumbria 16 5 WFD assessment objectives 18 6 High level WFD assessment 19 7 Pressures on the water environment 20 8 Assessment of the Cumbria LFRMS measures and actions 21 Glossary of Acronyms AWB Artificial Water Bodies BAU Business as Usual LDNP Lake District National Park EU European Union LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority FWMA Flood and Water Management Act 2010 LFRMS Local Flood Risk Management Strategy GCS Good Chemical Status RBMP River Basin Management Plan GEP Good Ecological Potential SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest GES Good Ecological Status SAC Special Area of Conservation HMWB Heavily Modified Water Bodies SPA Special Protection Area WFD Water Framework Directive Serving the people of Cumbria Annex G Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw
    Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw Mick Aston’s passion for involving people in archaeology is reflected in the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund. His determination to make archaeology publicly accessible was realised through his teaching, work on Time Team, and advocating community projects. The Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is therefore intended to encourage voluntary effort in making original contributions to the study and care of the historic environment. Please note that the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is currently open to applicants carrying out work in England and Wales only. Historic Scotland run a similar scheme for projects in Scotland and details can be found at: http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/index/heritage/grants/grants-voluntary-sector- funding.htm. How does the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund work? Voluntary groups and societies, but also individuals, are challenged to put forward proposals for innovative projects that will say something new about the history and archaeology of local surroundings, and thus inform their future care. Proposals will be judged by a panel on their intrinsic quality, and evidence of capacity to see them through successfully. What is the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund panel looking for? First and foremost, the panel is looking for original research. Awards can be to support new work, or to support the completion of research already in progress, for example by paying for a specific piece of analysis or equipment. Projects which work with young people or encourage their participation are especially encouraged. What can funding be used for? In principle, almost anything that is directly related to the actual undertaking of a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “Piecing Together Cambridgeshire’S Past
    Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “piecing together Cambridgeshire’s Past Final Report April 2007 Prepared By The Market Research Group (MRG), Bournemouth University, On Behalf Of Cambridgeshire County Council www.themarketresearchgroup.co.uk Page a Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ 1 1.0: Background .............................................................................. 3 1.1: The Market Research Group (MRG)........................................ 3 1.2: Cambridgeshire County Council .............................................. 4 2.0: Research Aims & Objectives................................................... 6 3.0: Outline Methodology................................................................ 8 3.1: Audience Research - Existing Users ....................................... 8 3.2: Audience Research - Potential Users ...................................... 9 3.3: Audience Research – JIGSAW Focus Groups ...................... 11 4.0: Findings –Cambridgeshire Archaeology users results...... 12 5.0: Findings – Potential users or non user survey ................... 39 6.0: Findings – Castle celebration event (non users) ................ 79 7.0: Findings - Schools – qualitative results............................. 101 8.0: Findings – Focus group results.......................................... 116 8.1: Users and non users focus groups
    [Show full text]
  • Module 1, Part C the Chronology of Archaeological Monuments
    Module 1, Part C The Chronology of Archaeological Monuments INTRODUCTION We looked at the subject of monuments and maps in part B, and this follow on section aims to help you recognise what time periods the different monuments date to. As mentioned before, there are a vast number of monuments that can be potentially marked on a map, or recorded in the National Monuments Record, some 417 in total. A full list of these is given at the end of this document, in appendix one. By no means are you expected to know them all, but it is important that you learn to recognise the most common features, and know what period they are likely to date to. When archaeologists talk about periods or eras, they are referring to the way we have divided up the past. In order to ease our understanding of history and prehistory, time is divided up into eras. These sometimes correspond with the introduction of major technical innovations, such as the introduction of metals or farming. Sometimes they refer to the reign of an important leader or monarch, such as the Edwardian period. Occasionally they refer to other events that have a major social impact, as is the case with the Viking period. It is important to remember that the end of one era and the beginning of the next is not always clear-cut. People did not simply set aside their stone tools, declaring the Stone Age over, and switch to metal overnight. There was transition and continuity for a long time, and cultures generally changed gradually.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and Information on Burnt Stone Activity in the River Clyde and Tweed Valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire
    Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. by Tam Ward 2013 Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. PAGE 1 Abstract Throughout the work of Biggar Archaeology Group’s (BAG) projects, burnt stone is shown to have played an important aspect of life in the past. Sometimes deliberately burnt as a method of transference of heat in the case of burnt mounds and where water was heated, and also in pits where dry cooking may have taken place, to co-incidentally being burnt in hearths and fireplaces during all periods from the Mesolithic to Post Medieval times. The recognition of burnt stone in the archaeology of the Southern Uplands of Scotland has been fundamental to interpretations by the Group in their voluntary work. The greatest manifestation of burnt stone appears in burnt mounds (BM), a relatively new class of site for the area of the Clyde and Tweed valleys, albeit now one of the most numerous. The subject of burnt stone in the general archaeology of BAG projects is also considered. Unenclosed Platform Settlements (UPS) are also a numerous site type in the area and perhaps are poorly understood in terms of their spatial distribution, chronology and function, as indeed are the BM. It is regarding these sites (BM & UPS) and their possible relationship with each other that this paper principally seeks to address. Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Medieval Period, Its Main Conclusion Is They Were Compiled at Malmesbury
    Early Medieval 10 Early Medieval Edited by Chris Webster from contributions by Mick Aston, Bruce Eagles, David Evans, Keith Gardner, Moira and Brian Gittos, Teresa Hall, Bill Horner, Susan Pearce, Sam Turner, Howard Williams and Barbara Yorke 10.1 Introduction raphy, as two entities: one “British” (covering most 10.1.1 Early Medieval Studies of the region in the 5th century, and only Cornwall by the end of the period), and one “Anglo-Saxon” The South West of England, and in particular the three (focusing on the Old Sarum/Salisbury area from the western counties of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset, later 5th century and covering much of the region has a long history of study of the Early Medieval by the 7th and 8th centuries). This is important, not period. This has concentrated on the perceived “gap” only because it has influenced past research questions, between the end of the Roman period and the influ- but also because this ethnic division does describe (if ence of Anglo-Saxon culture; a gap of several hundred not explain) a genuine distinction in the archaeological years in the west of the region. There has been less evidence in the earlier part of the period. Conse- emphasis on the eastern parts of the region, perhaps quently, research questions have to deal less with as they are seen as peripheral to Anglo-Saxon studies a period, than with a highly complex sequence of focused on the east of England. The region identi- different types of Early Medieval archaeology, shifting fied as the kingdom of Dumnonia has received detailed both chronologically and geographically in which issues treatment in most recent work on the subject, for of continuity and change from the Roman period, and example Pearce (1978; 2004), KR Dark (1994) and the evolution of medieval society and landscape, frame Somerset has been covered by Costen (1992) with an internally dynamic period.
    [Show full text]