Text of This Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2005 Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Steven M. Condon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Condon, Steven M., "Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History" (2005). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 22. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South- Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History By Steven M. Condon Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Version 1.0, 2005 This publication and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1706/ Manuscript approved for publication, March 3, 2005 Text edited by James W. Hendley II Layout and design by Stephen L. -
Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1973
Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1973 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1395-A NOV1419/5 5 81 Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1973 By GEORGE V. COHEE and WILNA R. WRIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1395-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1975 66 01-141-00 oM UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cohee, George Vincent, 1907 Changes in stratigraphic nomenclatures by the U. S. Geological Survey, 1973. (Contributions to stratigraphy) (Geological Survey bulletin; 1395-A) Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1395-A 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Nomenclature United States. I. Wright, Wilna B., joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin; 1395-A. QE75.B9 no. 1395-A [QE645] 557.3'08s 74-31466 [551.7'001'4] For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, B.C. 20402 Price 95 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02593 CONTENTS Page Listing of nomenclatural changes ______ _ Al Beulah Limestone and Hardscrabble Limestone (Mississippian) of Colorado abandoned, by Glenn R. Scott _________________ 48 New and revised stratigraphic names in the western Sacramento Valley, Calif., by John D. Sims and Andre M. Sarna-Wojcicki __ 50 Proposal of the name Orangeburg Group for outcropping beds of Eocene age in Orangeburg County and vicinity, South Carolina, by George E. Siple and William K. Pooser _________________ 55 Abandonment of the term Beattyville Shale Member (of the Lee Formation), by Gordon W. -
Mineral Occurrence and Development Potential Report Rawlins Resource
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Lands Involved and Record Data ....................................................................................1-2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY ...............................................................................................2-1 2.1 Physiography....................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Stratigraphy ......................................................................................................................2-3 2.2.1 Precambrian Era....................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2 Paleozoic Era ........................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.1 Cambrian System...................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.2 Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian Systems ........................................2-5 2.2.2.3 Mississippian System.............................................................................2-5 2.2.2.4 Pennsylvanian System...........................................................................2-5 2.2.2.5 Permian System.....................................................................................2-6 -
Appendix 1 – Environmental Predictor Data
APPENDIX 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTOR DATA CONTENTS Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Use and Land Cover ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Soils and Substrate .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 1 OVERVIEW A set of 94 potential predictor layers compiled to use in distribution modeling for the target taxa. Many of these layers derive from previous modeling work by WYNDD1, 2, but a -
Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?) -
Wildland Shrubs, Seed, Soil, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Seed Bank, Seed
Soils and Vegetation of the Snowy Range, Southeastern Wyoming Wildland Shrub Symposium Field Trip: Laramie to Woods Landing, Riverside, Libby Flats, and Centennial, Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Larry Munn C. Lynn Kinter Laramie, Wyoming, was established as a railroad con- trains also used 2 million gallons of water each day from the struction town in May, 1868. The transcontinental railroad Laramie River. Stops along the track where coal and water (Union Pacific) came across the Rockies in the late 1860s, were available developed into towns, for example, Rawlins across the then unsettled landscape that now contains and Rock Springs. We left town heading southwest via Cheyenne and Laramie, after a southern route through Highway 230. Elevation at Laramie is 7,170 ft (2,185 m), and Colorado was rejected because of the terrain. A relic of the precipitation is 10.5 inches (26 cm), most of which falls in Tertiary Ogallala formation called the “Gangplank” west of March through July. Cheyenne provided an access ramp across the mountains; Stop 1: University of Wyoming, Monolith Ranch by this was the first place north of Denver where it was feasible the fishing access to a Laramie River site with greasewood to build the railroad. It was also the first place west of (Sarcobatus vermiculatus). This is an area that was farmed Missouri that railroad ties could be cut from the surrounding at the turn of the last century. In 1906, a grain elevator forests, and railroaders timbered for ties extensively in the capable of loading 50,000 bushels onto railroad cars daily Laramie and Snowy Ranges (about 3,000,000 ties were cut was built in Laramie. -
Qt53v080hx.Pdf
UC Berkeley PaleoBios Title A new Early Pliocene record of the toothless walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53v080hx Journal PaleoBios, 34(0) ISSN 0031-0298 Author Boessenecker, Robert W. Publication Date 2017-06-15 DOI 10.5070/P9341035289 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PaleoBios 34:1-6, June 15, 2017 PaleoBios OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Boessenecker, Robert W. (2017). A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California. Cover photo: Life restoration of the extinct Pliocene walrus Valenictus and flightless auks (Mancalla) hauled out on the rocky shore of the uplifted Coast Ranges of California (top right); cliff exposures of the Purisima Formation near Santa Cruz, from where Valenictus was collected by Wayne Thompson (left); bivalves, chiefly Clinocardium meekianum, exposed in the Purisima Formation near the locality (bottom). Photo credit and original artwork: Robert W. Boessenecker. Citation: Boessenecker, Robert W. 2017. A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Puri- sima Formation of Northern California. PaleoBios, 34. ucmp_paleobios_35289 A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California ROBERT W. BOESSENECKER1,2 1Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424; [email protected] 2University of California Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 The walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) is a large tusked molluskivore that inhabits the Arctic and is the sole living member of the family Odobenidae. -
Paleogene: Paleocene) Of
Cainozoic Research, 8(1-2), pp. 13-28, December2011 Chondrichthyans from the Clayton Limestone Unit of the Midway Group (Paleogene: Paleocene) of Hot Spring County, Arkansas, USA ¹, ² Martin+A. Becker Lauren+C. Smith¹ & John+A. Chamberlain+Jr. 1 Department ofEnvironmentalScience, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey 07470; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department ofGeology, Brooklyn College andDoctoralProgram in Earth and EnvironmentalSciences, City University ofNew YorkGraduate Center, New York 10016; email:[email protected] Received 7 September 2010; revised version accepted 26 June 2011 LimestoneUnit of The Clayton the Midway Group (Paleocene) in southwestern Arkansas preserves one ofthe oldest chondrichthyan Cenozoic from the Gulf Coastal Plainofthe United assemblages yet reported States. Present are at least eight taxa, including; Odontaspis winkleriLeriche, Carcharias cf. whitei Carcharias Anomotodon 1905; (Arambourg, 1952); sp.; novus (Winkler, 1874); Cretalamnasp.; Otodus obliquus Agassiz, 1843; Hypolophodon sylvestris (White, 1931); Myliobatis dixoni Agassiz, 1843; and a chimaeridofindeterminate affiliation.Also present are lamnoid-type and carcharhinoid-type chondrichthyan vertebral centra. The Clayton chondrichthyan assem- blage derives from an outcrop locatedonly a few kilometersfrom a site exposing an assemblage ofMaastrichtianchondrichthyans from Because and the upper Arkadelphia Marl. these assemblages are closely spaced stratigraphically geographically, they provide data on chondrichthyan taxonomic turnover -
Meddelelser139.Pdf
MEDDELELSER NR. 139 Soviet Geological Research in Svalbard 1962-1992 Extended abstracts of unpublished reports Edited by: A.A. Krasil'scikov Polar Marine Geological Research Expedition NORSK POLARINSTITUTT OSLO 1996 Sponsored by: Russian-Norwegian Joint Venture "SEVOTEAM", St.Petersburg lAse Secretariat, Oslo ©Norsk Polarinstitutt, Oslo 1996 Compilation: AAKrasil'sCikov, M.Ju.Miloslavskij, AV.Pavlov, T.M.Pcelina, D.V.Semevskij, AN.Sirotkin, AM.Teben'kov and E.p.Skatov: Poljamaja morskaja geologorazvedocnaja ekspedicija, Lomonosov - St-Peterburg (Polar Marine Geological Research Expedition, Lomonosov - St.Petersburg) 189510, g. Lomonosov, ul. Pobedy, 24, RUSSIA Figures drawn by: N.G.Krasnova and L.S.Semenova Translated from Russian by: R.V.Fursenko Editor of English text: L.E.Craig Layout: W.K.Dallmann Printed February 1996 Cover photo: AM. Teben'kov: Field camp in Møllerfjorden, northwestem Spitsbergen, summer 1991. ISBN 82-7666-102-5 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS by W.K.DALLMANN 6 PREFACE by A.A.KRASIL'SCIKOV 7 1. MAIN FEATURES OF THE GEOLOGY OF SVALBARD 8 KRASIL'SCIKOV ET 1986: Explanatory notes to a series of geological maps of Spitsbergen 8 AL. 2. THE FOLDED BASEMENT 16 KRASIL'SCIKOV& LOPA 1963: Preliminary results ofthe study ofCaledonian granitoids and Hecla TIN Hoek gneis ses in northernSvalbard 16 KRASIL'SCIKOV& ABAKUMOV 1964: Preliminary results ofthe study of the sedimentary-metamorphic Hecla Hoek Complex and Paleozoic granitoids in centralSpitsbergen and northern Nordaustlandet 17 ABAKUMOV 1965: Metamorphic rocks of the Lower -
Metadc1 393321 CONTENTS
TM-D- 1-18 U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION DIVISION OF RAW MATERIALS DENVER AREA OFFICE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM DEPOSITS IN THE BROWNS PARK FORMATION IN MOFFAT COUNTY, COLORADO, AND CARBON COUNTY, WYOMING By Allen Ormond "This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic 3aergy Ocmission, nor amy of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their iaployees, make any warrantyr, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of ay infor- nation apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately- owned rights." Casper, Wyoming June 1957 metadc1 393321 CONTENTS ABSTRACT.......................... .... 1 INTRODUCTION....... .......... .. .. 1 Location and Accessibility... ... .. ... 1 Climate, Topography, and Drainage . .. 3 History of Uranium Operations.... .. ... 3 Land Ownership.......... .. .. .... 3 Previous Investigations.... .. .. ..... 4 Map Coverage. .......... .. .. .. ... 4 Purpose and Scope........ ... ..... 4 Acknowledgments...... .. .. .. ... 5 GENERAL GEOLOGY.................... .. 5 Geologic History ............ 5 Stratigraphy . 5 Precambrian .............. 5 Paleozoic............... ... ... 6 Mesozoic............... .. .. .... 6 Tertiary . 6 Structure.................. .. .. ... 8 URANIUM DEPOSITS OF THE MAYBELL AREA . 10 Marge and Gertrude Depos:its...... 10 Location ...... -
Triassic-Jurassic 'Red Beds' of the Rocky Mountain Region": a Discussion
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 1929 "Triassic-Jurassic 'Red Beds' of the Rocky Mountain Region": A Discussion John B. Reeside Jr. U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Reeside, John B. Jr., ""Triassic-Jurassic 'Red Beds' of the Rocky Mountain Region": A Discussion" (1929). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 498. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/498 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Journal of Geology, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1929), pp. 47-63 "TRIASSIC-JURASSIC 'RED BEDS' OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION": A DISCUSSION' JOHN B. REESIDE, JR. U.S. Geological Survey ABSTRACT The conclusion drawn by Professor E. B. Branson in a recent paper on the "Red Beds" of the Rocky Mountain region that parts of these beds are marine is considered likely. The conclusion that there exists no basis for subdivision of the beds is not accepted, and a division of the Mesozoic part into Lower Triassic, Upper Triassic, and Jurassic units is advocated. The conclusion that no eolian deposits are present likewise is not accepted, and the interpretation of important parts of the Jurassic unit as eolian is advocated. Disagreement is expressed with much of Professor Branson's correlation table, and a substitute is offered. -
Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. by Marin A
Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. By Marin A. Popov,1 Vito F. Nuccio,2 Thaddeus S. Dyman,2 Timothy A. Gognat,1 Ronald C. Johnson,2 James W. Schmoker,2 Michael S. Wilson,1 and Charles Bartberger1 Columbia Basin Western Washington Sweetgrass Arch (Willamette–Puget Mid-Continent Rift Michigan Basin Sound Trough) (St. Peter Ss) Appalachian Basin (Clinton–Medina Snake River and older Fms) Hornbrook Basin Downwarp Wasatch Plateau –Modoc Plateau San Rafael Swell (Dakota Fm) Sacramento Basin Hanna Basin Great Denver Basin Basin Santa Maria Basin (Monterey Fm) Raton Basin Arkoma Park Anadarko Los Angeles Basin Chuar Basin Basin Group Basins Black Warrior Basin Colville Basin Salton Mesozoic Rift Trough Permian Basin Basins (Abo Fm) Paradox Basin (Cane Creek interval) Central Alaska Rio Grande Rift Basins (Albuquerque Basin) Gulf Coast– Travis Peak Fm– Gulf Coast– Cotton Valley Grp Austin Chalk; Eagle Fm Cook Inlet Open-File Report 01–135 Version 1.0 2001 This report is preliminary, has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, and should not be reproduced or distributed. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. 1Geologic consultants on contract to the USGS 2USGS, Denver U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey BASIN-CENTERED GAS SYSTEMS OF THE U.S. DE-AT26-98FT40031 U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey Central Region Energy Team DOE Project Chief: Bill Gwilliam USGS Project Chief: V.F.