DOCSLIB.ORG

GEORGE ORWELL and the POLITICS of TRUTH Portrait of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEORGE ORWELL and the POLITICS of TRUTH Portrait of The GEORGE ORWELL AND THE POLITICS OF TRUTH Portraitof the Intellectual as a Man of Virtue LIONEL TRILLING G'EORGE ORWELL'S Homage to also a demonstration on the part of its author Catalonia is one of the important of one of the right ways of confronting that documents of our time. It is a very life. Its importance is therefore of the present modest book-it seems to say the least that moment and for years to come. can be said on a subject of great magnitude. A politics which is presumed to be avail- But in saying the least it says the most. Its able to everyone is a relatively new thing in manifest subject is a period of the Spanish the world. We do not yet know very much Civil War, in which, for some months, until about it. Nor have most of us been especially he was almost mortally wounded, its author eager to learn. In a politics presumed to be fought as a soldier in the trenches. Everyone available to everyone, ideas and ideals play knows that the Spanish war was a decisive a great part. And those of us who set store event of our epoch, everyone said so when by ideas and ideals have never been quite it was being fought, and everyone was able to learn that just because they do have right. But the Spanish war lies a decade and power nowadays, there is a direct connection a half behind us, and nowadays our sense of between their power and another kind of history is being destroyed by the nature of power, the old, unabashed, cynical power of our history-our memory is short and it grows force. We are always being surprised by this. shorter under the rapidity of the assault of Communism's record of the use of unregen- events. What once occupied all our minds erate force was perfectly clear years ago, but and filled the musty meeting halls with the many of us found it impossible to admit this awareness of heroism and destiny has now because Communism spoke boldly to our become chiefly a matter for the historical love of ideas and ideals. We tried as hard as scholar. George Orwell's book would make we could to believe that politics might be an only a limited claim upon our attention if idyl, only to discover that what we took to it were nothing more than a record of per- be a political pastoral was really a grim mili- sonal experiences in the Spanish war. But tary campaign or a murderous betrayal of it is much more than this. It is a testimony political allies-or that what we insisted on to the nature of modem political life. It is calling agrarianism was in actuality a new imperialism. And in the personal life what Fw writers in the English-speaking world have was undertaken by many good people as a written more penetratingly than LIONEL TRILL- moral commitment of the most disinterested ING on the problems of culture, art, and morality kind turned out to be an engagement to an in our time. It is of the problem of virtue-how ultimate immorality. The evidence of this a man may be good in an age of intellectual is to be found in a whole literary genre with double-dealing and failure of conscience-that he writes here, taking as his point of departure which we have become familiar in the last the life and work of "a man of virtue": George decade, the personal confession of involve- Orwell. This essay was written as an introduc- ment and then of disillusionment with Com- tion to a new edition of Orwell's Homage to munism. Catalonia, to be brought out next month by Orwell's book, in one of its most signifi- Harcourt, Brace. Mr. Trilling's books include cant aspects, is about disillusionment with Matthew Arnold (939), E. M. Forster (x943), The Middle of the Journey, a novel Communism, but it is not a confession. I (1947), and The Liberal Imagination (950). say this because it is one of the important 218 GEORGE ORWELL AND THE POLITICS OF TRUTH 219 positive things to say about Homage to Cata- and indeed at the very moment that I was lonia, but my saying it does not imply that I reaching for the telephone to tell the pub- share the a priori antagonistic feelings of lisher that I would write it, a young man, many people toward those books which, on a graduate student of mine, came in to see the basis of experience, expose and denounce me, the purpose of his visit being to ask the Communist party. About such books what I thought about his doing an essay on people of liberal inclination often make un- George Orwell. My answer, naturally, was easy and rather vindictive jokes. The jokes ready, and when I had given it and we had seem to me unfair and in bad taste. There been amused and pleased by the coincidence, is nothing shameful in the nature of these he settled down for some chat about our books. There is a good chance that the com- common subject. But I asked him not to mitment to Communism was made in the talk about Orwell. I didn't want to dissipate first place for generous reasons, and it is cer- in talk what ideas I had, and also I didn't tain that the revulsion was brought by more want my ideas crossed with his, which were than sufficient causes. And clearly there is sure to be very good. So for a while we nothing wrong in wishing to record the pain- merely exchanged bibliographical informa- ful experience and to draw conclusions from tion, asking each other which of Orwell's it. Nevertheless, human nature being what books we had read and which we owned. it is-and in the uneasy readers of such But then, as if he could not resist making at books as well as in the unhappy writers of least one remark about Orwell himself, he them-it is a fact that public confession does said suddenly in a very simple and matter-of- often appear in an unfortunate light, that fact way, "He was a virtuous man." And we its moral tone is less simple and true than sat there, agreeing at length about this state- we might wish it to be. But the moral tone ment, finding pleasure in talking about it. of Orwell's book is uniquely simple and It was an odd statement for a young man true. Orwell's ascertaining of certain politi- to make nowadays, and I suppose that what cal facts was not the occasion for a change of we found so interesting about it was just heart, or for a crisis of the soul. What he this oddity-its point was in its being an learned from his experiences in Spain of old-fashioned thing to say. It was archaic in course pained him very much, and it led its bold commitment of sentiment, and it him to change his course of conduct. But used an archaic word in an archaic simplic- it did not destroy him, it did not, as people ity. Our pleasure was not merely literary, say, cut the ground from under him. It did not just a response to the remark's being not shatter his faith in what he had previous- so appropriate to Orwell, in whom there was ly believed, nor weaken his political impulse, indeed a quality of an earlier day. We were nor even change its direction. It produced glad to be able to say it about anybody. not a moment of guilt or self-recrimination. One doesn't have the opportunity very often. Perhaps this should not seem so very Not that there are not many men who are remarkable. Yet who can doubt that it good, but there are few men who, in ad- constitutes in our time a genuine moral tri- dition to being good, have the simplicity and umph? It suggests that Orwell was an un- sturdiness and activity which allow us to say usual kind of man, that he had a temper of it about them, for somehow to say that a mind and heart which is now rare, although man "is good," or even to speak of a man we still respond to it when we see it. About who "is virtuous," is not the same thing as this person and the temper of his mind and saying, "He is a virtuous man." By some heart a word ought to be said. quirk of the spirit of the language, the form of that sentence brings out the primitive T HAPPENED by a curious chance that on meaning of the word virtuous, which is not the day I agreed to write the introduction merely moral goodness, but fortitude and to the new edition of Homage to Catalonia, strength. 220 COMMENTARY Orwell, by reason of the quality that per- of the world. In different ways this was true mits us to say of him that he was a virtuous of Yeats, and of Shaw, and even of Wells. man, is a figure in our lives. He was not a It is true of T. S. Eliot, for all that he has genius, and this is one of the remarkable spoken against the claims of personality in things about him. His not being a genius is literature. Even E. M. Forster, who makes an element of the quality that makes him so much of privacy, acts out in public the what I am calling a figure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master's Dissertation/ Trabajo Fin De Máster
    UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN Centro de Estudios de Postgrado Master’s Dissertation/ Trabajo Fin de Máster A STORY COME TRUE: AN ANALYSIS OF GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM (1945) Student: Balbuena Jurado, Juana Tutor: Dr. Pilar Sánchez Calle Dpt.: English Philology Centro de Estudios de Postgrado de Centro de Estudios December, 2017 1 ABSTRACT AND KEY WORDS Nowadays, we are living in an age in which people are losing their critical thought and are easily influenced by other people. This situation can be connected to George Orwell‘s eclipsed work Animal Farm (1945). This story starred by naïve farm animals seems to provide a lighter criticism on politics than the one offered in Orwell‘s most famous work Nineteen Eighty-four (1949). Nevertheless, this Master‘s Dissertation aims to prove the relevance of this work as a social criticism. With this purpose, this MD will study literature as a social criticism, Animal Farm‘s literary genre, its context, formal aspects and the critical reflections that it displays such as manipulation through language or indoctrination. Additionally, there will be a section devoted to analyse the influence of Animal Farm in our modern world: literature, music, cinema, TV and even our current way to approach politics. This work will be ended by drawing some conclusions about the influence of Animal Farm and the impact of its criticism. Key words: Animal Farm, George Orwell, Russia, communism, manipulation, social criticism. RESUMEN Y PALABRAS CLAVE Actualmente estamos en medio de un periodo en el que la gente está perdiendo su pensamiento crítico y es influenciada fácilmente por otros.
    [Show full text]
  • History 600: Public Intellectuals in the US Prof. Ratner-Rosenhagen Office
    Hannah Arendt W.E.B. DuBois Noam Chomsky History 600: Public Intellectuals in the U.S. Prof. Ratner-Rosenhagen Lecturer: Ronit Stahl Class Meetings: Office: Mosse Hum. 4112 Office: Mosse Hum. 4112 M 11 a.m.-1 p.m. email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Room: Mosse Hum. 5257 Prof. RR’s Office Hours: R.S.’s Office Hours: T 3- M 9 a.m.-11a.m. 5 p.m. This course is designed for students interested in exploring the life of the mind in the twentieth-century United States. Specifically, we will examine the life of particular minds— intellectuals of different political, moral, and social persuasions and sensibilities, who have played prominent roles in American public life over the course of the last century. Despite the common conception of American culture as profoundly anti-intellectual, we will evaluate how professional thinkers and writers have indeed been forces in American society. Our aim is to investigate the contested meaning, role, and place of the intellectual in a democratic, capitalist culture. We will also examine the cultural conditions, academic and governmental institutions, and the media for the dissemination of ideas, which have both fostered and inhibited intellectual production and exchange. Roughly the first third of the semester will be devoted to reading studies in U.S. and comparative intellectual history, the sociology of knowledge, and critical social theory. In addition, students will explore the varieties of public intellectual life by becoming familiarized with a wide array of prominent American philosophers, political and social theorists, scientists, novelists, artists, and activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Lionel Trilling Jefferson Lecturer the Blakelock Problem
    Humanities New York City, a sheaf of rolled-up canvases under his arm, while Blakelock bargained; as often as not, they’d return to the same dealers with the same pic­ tures just before closing, Blakelock desperate and willing to accept almost anything for his work. He was a self-taught artist, born and raised in New York City, who headed west after graduation from what is now the City University of New York, sketch­ ing his way across the plains to the coast, returning by way of Mexico, Panama, and the West Indies. At first he painted pictures in the Hudson River style— romantically colored panoramas identifiable with the locales he had visited. But as the years passed, the children came, and fame, fortune or even a minimal income eluded him, Blakelock started building on canvas a world of his own: dark scenes, heavy with overarching trees Dr. Lionel Trilling brooding over moonlit waters, highly romantic Indian Jefferson Lecturer encampments that never were. Bright colors left his palette, the hues of night dominated. Dr. Lionel Trilling will deliver the first Jefferson Lec­ Blakelock did build up a modest following of col­ ture in the Humanities before a distinguished au­ lectors, but in the 1870’s and 1880’s, $30 to $50 was dience at the National Academy of Sciences Audi­ a decent price for a sizable painting by an unknown, torium, 2101 Constitution Avenue Northwest, Wash­ and his fees never caught up with his expenses. Only ington, D. C. on Wednesday, April 26 at eight once did light break through: in 1883, the Toledo o ’clock.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Critical Essays, George Orwell, Harvill Secker, 2009
    Critical Essays, George Orwell, Harvill Secker, 2009, 1846553261, 9781846553264, . Orwell’s essays demonstrate how mastery of critical analysis gives rise to trenchant aesthetic and philosophical commentary. Here is an unrivalled education in – as George Packer puts in the foreword to this new two-volume collection – “how to be interesting, line after line.”. DOWNLOAD http://bit.ly/1979wHt Some Thoughts on the Common Toad , George Orwell, 2010, English essays, 115 pages. In this collection of eight witty and sharply written essays, Orwell looks at, among others, the joys of spring (even in London), the picture of humanity painted by Gulliver .... 1984 A Novel, George Orwell, 1977, Fiction, 268 pages. Portrays life in a future time when a totalitarian government watches over all citizens and directs all activities.. George Orwell: As I please, 1943-1946 , George Orwell, Jan 1, 2000, Literary Collections, 496 pages. Animal farm a fairy story, George Orwell, 1987, Fiction, 203 pages. I belong to the Left 1945, George Orwell, Peter Hobley Davison, Ian Angus, Sheila Davison, 1998, Literary Criticism, 502 pages. Collected Essays , George Orwell, 1968, , 460 pages. Voltaire's notebooks, Volumes 148-149 , Theodore Besterman, 1976, , 247 pages. Selected writings , George Orwell, 1958, English essays, 183 pages. George Orwell, the road to 1984 , Peter Lewis, Jan 1, 1981, Biography & Autobiography, 122 pages. Shooting an Elephant , George Orwell, 2003, Fiction, 357 pages. 'Shooting an Elephant' is Orwell's searing and painfully honest account of his experience as a police officer in imperial Burma; killing an escaped elephant in front of a crowd ...
    [Show full text]
  • Lionel Trilling's Existential State
    Lionel Trilling’s Existential State Michael Szalay Death is like justice is supposed to be. Ralph Ellison, Three Days Before the Shooting IN 1952, LIONEL TRILLING ANNOUNCED THAT “intellect has associated itself with power, per- haps as never before in history, and is now conceded to be in itself a kind of power.” He was de- scribing what would be his own associations: his personal papers are littered with missives from the stars of postwar politics. Senator James L. Buckley admires his contribution to American let- ters. Jacob J. Javits does the same. Daniel Patrick Moynihan praises him as “the nation’s leading literary critic.” First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy writes from the White House, thanking him for the collection of D. H. Lawrence stories and hoping to see him again soon. Three years later, President Lyndon Johnson sends a telegram asking Trilling to represent him at the funeral of T. S. Eliot. Politicians liked having Trilling around. He confirmed their noble sense of mission as often as they praised him.1 Trilling’s accommodating relation to power alienated many of his peers, like Irving Howe and C. Wright Mills, and later provoked condemnations from historians like Christopher Lasch and MICHAEL SZALAY teaches American literature and culture at UC, Irvine, and is the author of New Deal Modernism and The Hip Figure, forthcoming from Stanford University Press. He is co-editor of Stanford’s “Post*45” Book Series. 1 Trilling thought that the political establishment embraced intellectuals because it was “uneasy with itself” and eager “to apologize for its existence by a show of taste and sensitivity.” Trilling, “The Situation of the American Intellectual at the Present Time,” in The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105
    Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_103 rev1 page 103 part iii Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_104 rev1 page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_105 rev1 page 105 chapter five The Neoconservative Journey Jacob Heilbrunn The Neoconservative Conspiracy The longer the United States struggles to impose order in postwar Iraq, the harsher indictments of the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy are becoming. “Acquiring additional burdens by engag- ing in new wars of liberation is the last thing the United States needs,” declared one Bush critic in Foreign Affairs. “The principal problem is the mistaken belief that democracy is a talisman for all the world’s ills, and that the United States has a responsibility to promote dem- ocratic government wherever in the world it is lacking.”1 Does this sound like a Democratic pundit bashing Bush for par- tisan gain? Quite the contrary. The swipe came from Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and copublisher of National Interest. Simes is not alone in calling on the administration to reclaim the party’s pre-Reagan heritage—to abandon the moralistic, Wilsonian, neoconservative dream of exporting democracy and return to a more limited and realistic foreign policy that avoids the pitfalls of Iraq. 1. Dimitri K. Simes, “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs (Novem- ber/December 2003): 97, 100. Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_106 rev1 page 106 106 jacob heilbrunn In fact, critics on the Left and Right are remarkably united in their assessment of the administration. Both believe a neoconservative cabal has hijacked the administration’s foreign policy and has now overplayed its hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    About This Volume Thomas Horan In his dystopian masterpiece Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell deftly weaves political satire, cultural studies, linguistics, and prescient caveats into a haunting narrative replete with unforgettable characters and enduring motifs. Nineteen Eighty-Four is that rare book that transcends a niche genre—in this case, speculative ¿FWLRQ²WRDFKLHYHVHPLQDOVWDWXVZLWKLQERWKSRSXODUFXOWXUHDQG the canon of British and Commonwealth literature. Critical Insights: Nineteen Eighty-FourFRQWH[WXDOL]HV2UZHOO¶V¿QDODQG¿QHVWQRYHO within the author’s multidisciplinary oeuvre, the complex cultural climate of its composition, and the diverse range of critical responses WR WKH WH[W 7KH ¿UVW WKUHH HVVD\V ZKLFK FRPSULVH WKH ³&ULWLFDO Contexts” section of the book, address Nineteen Eighty-Four’s literary and historical importance as well as its ongoing relevance to contemporary readers, providing a foundation for further study and scholarly work. In his essay addressing Nineteen Eighty-Four’s cultural and historical background, Bradley W. Hart traces Orwell’s antiauthoritarian political development through the nineteen thirties and forties, focusing on Orwell’s increasing resistance to both left- DQGULJKWZLQJH[WUHPLVP7KURXJKDFORVHH[DPLQDWLRQRI2UZHOO¶V reaction to British domestic policy during the Second World War, Hart shows how Nineteen Eighty-Four was partially shaped by Orwell’s belief that unquestioning commitment to political ideology alienates people from the core sociopolitical values they espouse. ,Q WKH ³&ULWLFDO /HQV´ FKDSWHU 7RQ\ %XUQV SURYLGHV DQ overview of scholarship that questions the traditional notion that Nineteen Eighty-Four is an anti-utopia. Pointing to utopian possibilities embedded in Orwell’s overtly pessimistic dystopia, %XUQV GHPRQVWUDWHV KRZ 2UZHOO¶V ¿QDO QRYHO FDQ EH XQGHUVWRRG as a forerunner of the critical dystopias of the late twentieth and HDUO\WZHQW\¿UVWFHQWXULHVQDUUDWLYHVWKDWFRQFOXGHZLWKVXI¿FLHQW vii ambiguity to allow for the possibility, however remote, of social renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Podhoretz: a Biography"
    Books Book Review: "Norman Podhoretz: A Biography" By Thomas L. Jeffers (Cambridge University Press). By Saul Rosenberg '93GSAS | Fall 2010 Norman Podhoretz, a maker of friends, ex-friends, and enemies. (David Howells / Corbis) John Gross, the English literary critic, was once in a magazine office in New York when the secretary called across the room to him: “John, there’s a Mr. Podhoretz on the phone for you.” As Gross recalled, “I felt every pair of eyes drilling into me, as though she’d said, ‘There’s a Mr. Himmler on the phone for you.’” This anecdote, retold by Thomas Jeffers in his Norman Podhoretz: A Biography, nicely sums up what many people feel about “Mr. Podhoretz.” He is hated by liberals for his turn to the right at the end of the sixties, and particularly loathed for his energetic support of Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and the Iraq War. So it is good someone should remind us, as Jeffers admiringly does, that Podhoretz is a first- class intellectual of enormous culture and considerable humanity. Podhoretz ’50CC was a first-generation American prodigy, an acute reader initially of literature and then politics, whose aggressive intellect took him from beat-up Brownsville through a glittering student career at Columbia College and Cambridge University to the editorship of Commentary at age 30. He edited the monthly from 1960 to 1995 into a publication The Economist once mused might be “the best magazine in the world.” In the last 25 years of his tenure, Podhoretz helped found and lead the neoconservative revolution that insisted, against some popular and much elite opinion, that America was, for all its faults, a clear force for good in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Liberal Imagination in The Middle of the Journey Christopher Phelps When Lionel Trilling's first and only novel, The Middle of the Journey, was published in 1947, the circle of writers and cultural critics with whom he had long been associated was near the completion of its political transformation from anti-Stalinist radicalism to anti-communist liberalism. Only ten years before, most of these figures, yet to reach their self-anointed destiny as "the New York intellectuals," had been revolutionary socialists. Following a momentary association with Communism in the early thirties, they had become outspoken opponents of the bureaucratic despotism that had over- taken the global Communist movement, all the while upholding Marxism and retaining their opposition to imperialism and capitalism. By the late 1940s, however, a succession of international disasters - the Moscow trials, the Hitler-Stalin pact, the Second World War and the emergent Cold War, as well as the toll exacted over time by the condition of marginality to which revolu- tionary anti-Stalinists were relegated - had unmoored the New York intel- lectuals, with few exceptions, from their commitment to the liberation of the working class and the abolition of capitalism. The Middle of the Journey appeared at that unique moment in postwar intellectual history when the New York intellectuals' attachment to revolutionary aims had been severed but their ultimate course was not yet altogether fixed. If the mid-1940s were somewhat fluid, by the early 1950s the New York intellectuals were the practitioners of a suave, disappointed liberalism. Although they continued to refer to themselves as the "anti-Stalinist left," or part of it, their politics became ever more narrowly liberal as they ceased to distinguish between the worldview of Marxism, or the social ideal of commu- nism, and the reality of Stalinism.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary Magazine the Legacy of the 30’S by Robert S
    The Legacy of the 30’s - Commentary Magazine The Legacy of the 30’s By Robert S. Warshow COMMENTARY - December 1947 The Middle of the Journey, the novel by Lionel Trilling just published by Viking, is one of the first to deal with what is possibly the the major experience of the intellectuals of our time—their involvement, stemming from the 30’s, in the complex of ideas and activities called variously “the Communist movement,” the “Marxist viewpoint,” “progressivism,” “liberalism,” etc. In the 30’s the intellectual’s commitments expressed themselves in “politics”; more recently they have been chiefly cultural, a matter of opinion and attitude—pro and con. In any case, the moral dilemmas involved in the experience—and the intellectual and artistic problems set by the need to know what it meant (and still means)—are very much with us now. In this article, Robert Warshow discusses some of the implications he sees in Mr. Trilling’s novel, which is already one of the two or three most widely discussed books in intellectual circles today. _____________ For most American intellectuals, the Communist movement of the 1930’s was a crucial experience. In Europe, where the movement was at once more serious and more popular, it was still only one current in intellectual life; the Communists could never completely set the tone of thinking in Europe, and Communist intellectuals themselves were able to draw a part of their nourishment from outside the movement. But in this country there was a time when virtually all intellectual vitality was derived in one way or another from the Communist party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Censorship of George Orwell's Essays in Spain1
    The Censorship of George Orwell's Essays in Spain1 ALBERTO LÁZARO (Universidad de Alcalá) While much of George Orwell's popularity rests on bis political fiction, particularly Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), his achievements as an essayist have also been widely celebrated. Apart from his books of extended reportage published in the 1930s - Down and Out in Paris and London (1933), The Road to Wigan Pier (1937) and Homage to Catalonia (1938) - Orwell's literary production of the 1940s inc1uded a very large number of reviews, artic1es and essays that appeared in a wide variety of periodical publications, such as the Observer, London Tribune, Manchester Evening News, The Listener, Partisan Review, Horizon, Left News and New Leader. Orwell only published two important collections of essays during bis lifetime, lnside the Whale (1940) and Critical Essays (1946), but irnmediately after bis death in 1950 several other volumes were produced, wbich gave English-speaking readers access to a wide variety of bis autobiographical, literary, political, sociological and cultural essays. In 1968 the four-volume Collected Essays, Joumalism and Letters oi George Orwell' edited by Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, arrived as a brilliant c1imaxto Orwell's literary production, and gave further weight to the c1aimthat here indeed was a perceptive critic with a keen analytical eye and a persistent ability to tell unpleasant truths. During the Cold War period his essays were a much-quoted source in discussions of the threat of totalitarianism, imperialism in the East, the hypocrisy of intellectuals or the manipulation of the press during the Spanish Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine, L9l8-21 and Spain, 1936-39: a Comparison of Armed Anarchist Struggles in Europe
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses Fall 2020 Ukraine, l9l8-21 and Spain, 1936-39: A Comparison of Armed Anarchist Struggles in Europe Daniel A. Collins Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Daniel A., "Ukraine, l9l8-21 and Spain, 1936-39: A Comparison of Armed Anarchist Struggles in Europe" (2020). Honors Theses. 553. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/553 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ukraine, 1918-21 and Spain, 1936-39: A Comparison of Armed Anarchist Struggles in Europe by Daniel A. Collins An Honors Thesis Submitted to the Honors Council For Honors in History 12/7/2020 Approved by: Adviser:_____________________________ David Del Testa Second Evaluator: _____________________ Mehmet Dosemeci iii Acknowledgements Above all others I want to thank Professor David Del Testa. From my first oddly specific question about the Austro-Hungarians on the Italian front in my first week of undergraduate, to here, three and a half years later, Professor Del Testa has been involved in all of the work I am proud of. From lectures in Coleman Hall to the Somme battlefield, Professor Del Testa has guided me on my journey to explore World War I and the Interwar Period, which rapidly became my topics of choice.
    [Show full text]