The Malaysian Co-Operative Movement: an Empirical Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

THE MALAYSIAN CO-OPERATIVE MOVEMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS by Juliawati Janius A thesis submitted to the University of Sheffield for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics June 2007 ABSTRACT The Malaysian co-operative sector, even after almost a century of its existence, remains a movement that has not made a significant contribution to the Malaysian economy. The usual problems associated with the weaknesses of co-operatives, such as issues related to management, finance, leadership, and members' participation have been raised, over and over again, in Malaysia. This thesis, therefore, contributes to our knowledge and understanding of co-operatives in Malaysia by presenting original empirical analysis of a unique primary data source. As such, to our knowledge, the thesis presents the first econometric study of co-operatives in Malaysia based on co­ operative level data. In countries where co-operatives have made a significant economic impact, it appears to be related to the work of secondary co-operatives, which are organisations of the primary co-operatives. Not one of the 35 secondary co-operatives in Malaysia has been noted, however, for any significant economic contribution. The possible cause of this may lie in the kind of primary co-operatives, which have individuals as members, that exist in the Malaysian co-operative movement, which may have contributed to the weakness of secondary co-operatives. The existing literature suggests that secondary co-operatives function better if primary co-operatives are small and if the primary co­ operative's activity reflects the members' business. The empirical analysis presented in this thesis explores the relationship between primary co-operatives and secondary co­ operatives in Malaysia, focusing on issues such as the benefits received by primary co- I operatives from secondary co-operatives. The findings suggest that increased primary co-operative membership represents an important source of benefits to primary co­ operatives. A related issue explored in this thesis concerns the determinants of the level of trust in co-operatives among Malaysian co-operators. Finally, we present analysis of the relationship between the level of trust in the co-operative and co-operative size. The findings support an inverse relationship between co-operative size and trust, which may be the result of the institutional framework in Malaysia, which specifies that a minimum of 100 individuals are required to form a co-operative in Malaysia. Contents Acknowledgements v List of Tables vi List of Abbreviations ix Definitions x Chapter 1 - Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Organisation of the Thesis 7 Chapter 2 - Overview of the Emergence and Expansion of Co-operatives 11 2.1. Introduction 11 2.2. The Origins and Foundations of Co-operatives 12 2.2.1. The Development ofCo-operative Thought 12 2.2.2. The Meaning ofCo-operation 13 2.2.3. The Idea ofCo-operation 14 2.2.4. From Co-operation to Co-operatives 15 2.2.5. The Foundation ofCo-operatives 17 2.2.6. The Spirit ofSelf-Help 18 2.3. The Expansion of the Co-operative Movement 19 2.4. Specific Case Studies: UK, Germany and India 24 2.4.1. The Development ofConsumer Co-operatives in the UK 25 2.4.2. The Development ofCo-operatives in Germany 29 2.4.3. The Development ofCo-operatives in India 31 2.5. Summary 34 Chapter 3 - The Operation of Co-operatives 35 3.1. Introduction 35 3.2. The Definition and the Concept of Co-operatives 36 3.3. The Organizational and Operational Aspects of Co-operatives 40 3.3.1. The Co-operative Principles 41 3.3.2. Co-operatives' Capital, Income and Assets 42 3.3.3. Authority and Control in Co-operatives 45 3.3.4. The Common Interest 47 3.3.5. The System Structure ofthe Co-operative Movement 48 3.3.6. The Legal Frameworkfor Co-operatives 52 3.4. Co-operative Performance 54 3.5. Summary 58 Chapter 4 - The Co-operative Movement in Malaysia 59 4.1. Introduction 59 4.2. Malaysia, The Country 60 4.3. Growth and Development of the Co-operative Movement 62 4.3.1. The Movement's Early Days 62 4.3.2. The Transplant ofthe Co-operative Institution in Malaysia 65 4.3.3. The Early Impact ofCo-operatives 66 4.3.4. The Expansion Phase 67 4.3.5. The Movement's Structural Expansion 70 4.3.6. The Co-operative Legislature 73 4.4. Support for Co-operative Development 75 4.4.1. The Ministry 75 4.4.2. The Department ofCo-operative Development (DCD) 75 4.4.3. The Co-operative College ofMalaysia (CCM) 79 4.5. Economic Statistics on the Co-operative Movement 80 4.5.1. The Growth ofCo-operatives 80 4.5.2. The Distribution ofCo-operatives 82 4.5.3. The Distribution ofCo-operative Members 84 4.5.4. Share Capital and Assets 85 4.5.5. The Composition ofCo-operative Members according to Social and Economic Groups 86 4.5.6. The Business Performance ofCo-operatives 88 4.5.7. Employment in Co-operatives 89 4.6. The Secondary Co-operatives 90 4.6.1. Distribution and Group Size ofSecondary Co-operatives 90 4.6.2. The Active and the Inactive Secondary Co-operatives 91 4.6.3. Secondary Co-operatives in Government Development Schemes 92 4.6.4. Trends in the Establishment ofSecondary Co-operatives 93 4.6.5. Secondary Co-operatives' Performance 94 4.7. Summary 95 Appendix A4.1: The States of Malaysia 99 Appendix A4.2: The Bank Rakyat 100 Appendix A4.3: Tables Relating to the Analysis of the Malaysian Co- 101 operative Movement Chapter 5 - The Sunrey of Co-operatives in Malaysia 113 5.1. Introduction 113 5.2. The Mail Survey Questionnaire 114 5.2.1. The Questionnaire 115 5.2.2. The Population and the Sample 118 5.2.3. The Data 120 5.3. Profile of the Primary Co-operatives: Summary Statistics 123 5.3.1. The Number ofMembers, Share Capital and Assets 123 5.3.2. The Composition ofMembers by Occupation and by Race; the 124 Distribution ofthe Co-operative's Members; and the Co- operative's Area ofOperation 5.3.3. The Co-operative 's Area ofActivity 125 5.3.4. Membership and the Tenure ofMembership in Secondary Co- 127 operatives 5.4. The Perceived Roles of Secondary Co-operatives 129 5.5. Summary 130 Appendix A5.1: The Questionnaire 132 Appendix A5.2: Letter 1 - Translated Version of the Researcher's Letter to 138 Members of the Co-operative Board, which accompanied the Questionnaire ii Appendix AS.3: Letter 2 - Translated Version of the DCD's Letter to the Co- 139 operatives Appendix AS.4: List of Primary Co-operatives in the Sample 140 Appendix AS.S: Summary Statistics for the Co-operatives in the Sample 144 Chapter 6 - The Relationship between Primary and Secondary Co- 151 operatives: An Empirical Analysis 6.1. Introduction 151 6.2. A Review of the Literature on Secondary Co-operatives 154 6.3. Data and Methodology for the Analysis of the Primary-Secondary Co- 160 operative Relationship 6.4. The Results 165 6.4.1. The Primary Co-operatives' Membership and Secondary Co- operatives 165 6.4.2. The Primary Co-operatives' Share Capital and Secondary Co- operatives 172 6.4.3. The Primary Co-operatives' Assets and Secondary Co- operatives 175 6.4.4. An Aggregate Measure ofPrimary Co-operative Size 177 6.4.5. Summary 182 6.S. Analysis of the Relevance of Secondary Co-operatives 183 6.5.1. Satisfaction with Secondary Co-operatives 185 6.5.2. The Perception ofthe Need/or Secondary Co-operatives 193 6.6. Summary 197 Appendix A6: Results Table 200 Chapter 7 - An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of the Level 216 of Trust among Malaysian Co-operators 7.1. Introduction 216 7.2. Trust in the Formation of Co-operative Groups 219 7.3. Trust 222 7.3.1. The Definition of Trust 222 7.3.2. The Measurement of Trust 224 7.3.3. The Determinants of Trust 226 7.4. Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Co-operators' Trust 228 7.4.1. Co-operators' Trust in the Co-operative Institution 228 7.4.2. Empirical Analysis ofthe Relationship between Co-operators' Trust in Co-operatives and Other Types o/Trust 238 7.4.3. Empirical Analysis of Willingness to Invest in a Co-operative Business and Trust in Co-operatives 242 7.4.4. Comparing the General Level ofand Pattern of Trust ofCo- operators with a General Sample ofIndividuals 246 7.5. Summary 251 Appendix A 7.1: Results Tables 254 Appendix A7.2: Summary of the vast literature exploring the determinants 265 of trust iii Appendix A7.2: Translation of the e-mail introducing the survey and the 266 attached e-mail questionnaire Chapter 8 - Co-operative Size and Trust in the Co-operative 270 8.1. Introduction 270 8.2. Trust in the Co-operative and the Size of a Co-operative Group 272 8.3. Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Trust in the Co- 275 operative and Co-operative Size 8.3.1. The Effect olCo-operative Size on Trust in the Co-operative 275 8.3.2. The Level olTrust in Co-operatives and Different Categories 01 Co-operative Size 278 8.3.3. Trust in the Co-operative and Membership Size: Bivariate Probit Analysis 280 8.4. Trust in the Co-operative and Co-operative Performance 282 8.5. Summary 287 Appendix AS.l: Results Tables 289 Appendix A8.2: Co-operative's Income and Profit/Loss for Year ending 291 31.12.2003 Chapter 9 - Conclusion 294 References 303 lV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout this study period, I have received support and encouragement from many individuals and organisations.
Recommended publications
  • World Co-Operative Monitor Explorative Report 2012

    World Co-Operative Monitor Explorative Report 2012

    EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY EXPLORATIVE REPORT 2012 EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY Download PDF THE 2012 WORLD CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY AN ICA WITH THE SCIENTIFIC IN OCCASION OF INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE COLLABORATION OF EURICSE YEAR OF COOPERATIVES As the International Year of Co-operatives draws to a Thanks to the support of Crédit Coopératif, the Desjardins close, this is an opportune time to reflect on an exciting Group, the Indian Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO), year full of opportunities and initiatives that celebrate Organisação das Cooperativas Brasileiras (OCB), and organisations, in which co-operative members, who own The Co-operative Group, ICA has now partnered with the and govern a business, collectively benefit. European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse) to re-launch the Global300 in 2012 Scalability, value-based sustainability, and democracy as the World Co-operative Monitor. MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF OUR SPONSORS are the three key messages utilised to promote a model of business that supports the social and economic Euricse, which since its founding has been committed development of economies, communities, and individuals to promoting knowledge about co-operative organisations, around the world. believes strongly in the need to monitor co-operatives and SistemaOCB to continue the work begun with the Global300. CNCOOP - OCB - SESCOOP Throughout this year, the International Co-operative Alliance (ICA) has promoted and supported a large number The goal is to move beyond the largest 300 and beyond of initiatives. As the global voice of co-operatives, ICA the measure of annual turnover. To accomplish this, ICA will determined that the International Year of Co-operatives also be partnering with other co-operative lists, by country and presented the perfect opportunity to collect data on the sector, sharing data where possible and making it available largest co-operatives in the world.
  • The COVID-19 Outbreak Update from Legacoop, Italy

    The COVID-19 Outbreak Update from Legacoop, Italy

    The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399... Advancing social justice, promoting decent work ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy This update provide insights on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Italian cooperative enterprises, and measures being taken by them to support workers, members/customers, and people in their communities affected by the crisis. News | 27 March 2020 "We are women and men cooperators who are present right alongside the doctors and nurses, keeping hospitals clean, operating in supermarkets, offices, warehouses, kitchens and thermal power plants. We are the ones working in social cooperatives to keep assistance alive for populations that were already vulnerable before the pandemic and are even more so after.” - Mauro Lusetti, President, Legacoop The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted life dramatically in Italy. On 25 March there were 74,386 confirmed cases with 7,503 deaths and 9,362 recoveries. The stringent measures adopted by the Italian Government, needed to slow down and contain the virus, have had seriously detrimental consequences for enterprises in the country. Regarding cooperative enterprises, if the emergency situation and the measures around the coronavirus pandemic continue for a longer period, it is expected that workers at risk could reach at least 265,000. This estimate is based on the number of workers and worker members in cooperatives in a number of key sectors, including: Social cooperatives pointed out that 200,000 workers could be at risk only in their sector, as they are precluded from carrying out activities of general interest, such as taking care of elderly and disabled people due to the closure of day centres, or interruption of home care, as well as 1 sur 4 17/04/2020 à 10:43 The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399..
  • Bibliography of Cooperatives and Cooperative Development

    Bibliography of Cooperatives and Cooperative Development

    Bibliography of Cooperatives and Cooperative Development Compiled by the following Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs personnel: Original, 1999 Christopher D. Merrett, PhD, IIRA director and professor Norman Walzer, PhD, professor of Economics and IIRA director emeritus Update, 2007 Cynthia Struthers, PhD, associate professor, Housing/Rural Sociology Program Erin Orwig, MBA, faculty assistant, Value-Added Rural Development/Cooperative Development Roger Brown, MBA, manager, Value-Added Rural Development/Cooperative Development Mathew Zullo, graduate assistant Ryan Light, graduate assistant Jeffrey Nemeth, graduate assistant S. Robert Wood, graduate assistant Update, 2012 Kara Garten, graduate assistant John Ceglarek, graduate assistant Tristan Honn, research assistant Published by Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs Stipes Hall 518 Western Illinois University 1 University Circle Macomb, IL 61455-1390 [email protected] www.IIRA.org This publication is available from IIRA in print and on the IIRA website. Quoting from these materials for noncommercial purposes is permitted provided proper credit is given. First Printing: September 1999 Second Printing: September 2007 Third Printing: June 2012 Printed on recycled paper Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................1 II. Theory and History of Cooperatives ....................................................................................................3 III. Governance,
  • Handbook on Cooperatives for Use by Workers' Organizations

    Handbook on Cooperatives for Use by Workers' Organizations

    Handbook on Cooperatives for use by Workers’ Organizations Guy Tchami Cooperative Programme International Labour Office Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2007 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected]], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. ILO / Guy Tchami Handbook on cooperatives for use of Workers’ Organizations (Geneva), International Labour Office, (2007) Translated in English by Joan S. Macdonald ISBN 978-92-2-115655-0 Also available in French : Manuel sur les coopératives à l’usage des organisation de travailleurs, (ISBN 92-2-215655-2) Geneva, (2006) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
  • Credit Unions

    Credit Unions

    Developments in Consumers’ Cooperatives in 1951 Bulletin No. 1073 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Maurice J. Tobin, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Ewan Clague, Commissioner Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Developments in Consumers’ Cooperatives in 1951 Bulletin No. 1073 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Maurice J. Tobin, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Ewan Clague, Commissioner For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price 20 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Letter of Transmittal United States D epartment of Labor, B ureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D. CMarch 3, 1952. The Secretary of Labor: I have the honor to transmit herewith a report on events in the consumers' cooperative movement in 1951. This report was prepared by Florence E. Parker, of the Bureau's Office of Labor Economics. Ewan Clague, Commissioner. Hon. Maurice J. Tobin, Secretary of Labor. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contents Page Progress in 1951_____________________________________________________________ 1 Local cooperatives___________________________________________________________ 1 Distributive associations_________________________________________________ 1 Housing________________________________________________________________ 3 Medical care_______________________________________________
  • Combatting Inequality Through Employee Ownership

    Combatting Inequality Through Employee Ownership

    COMBATTING INEQUALITY THROUGH EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP Worker Cooperatives and Employee Stock Ownership Programs in Buffalo-Niagara Kristin Ksiazek and Annabel Bacon Introduction Communities across the United States are grappling with income inequality. Since 1979, earnings of the top one percent of Americans have risen by a staggering 157%, compared to an increase of just 22.2% for the bottom 90% of workers.1 Today, 44 percent of American workers earn less than $18,000 per year, while the CEOs of the largest 350 companies earn, on average, $18.9 million per year.2 From 1978 to 2018, compensation for CEOs grew 940.3%, but wages for typical, nonsupervisory workers grew by just 11.9%.3 Wealth gaps between the most privileged and marginalized social and demographic groups have widened by even larger amounts—to the point where, in 2015, for every dollar in wealth owned by white households, black and Latinx households held just six and eight cents, respectively; and women owned only 32 cents for every dollar held by men.4 Equally as troubling, present generations are far less likely than their parents and grandparents to experience upward economic mobility,5 and they are burdened by much more student debt.6 Job seekers of all educational backgrounds are faced with fewer choices in the American labor market, where much of the recent job growth has come in the form of low-wage work.7 This trend means that low income workers do not have the option to simply “find better paying jobs.” Rather, the data show that “there are not enough living wage jobs to go around.”8 The lack of living-wage jobs disproportionately affects women and workers of color.
  • Exploring the Cooperative Economy Report 2019 Report 2019

    Exploring the Cooperative Economy Report 2019 Report 2019

    EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2019 REPORT 2019 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY www.monitor.coop Titolo capitolo 1 THE 2019 WORLD Bruno Roelants THE WORLD COOPERATIVE MONITOR IS AN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE INITIATIVE WITH THE SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT OF EURICSE COOPERATIVE MONITOR Gianluca Salvatori EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF OUR ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS The International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) and the We have also continued in this year’s report with the analysis European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social of the contribution of the Top 300 to meeting the objectives of the Enterprises (Euricse) are pleased to present the eighth UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Utilizing documents annual World Cooperative Monitor report. This publica - reported in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) format, we ana- tion reports on the world’s largest cooperatives and mu - lysed indicators related to SDG 8 (inclusive and sustainable eco- tuals, or groups of cooperatives and mutuals, providing nomic growth, full and productive employment and decent work rankings of the Top 300 and sectoral analysis based on for all) to demonstrate the concrete actions taken by the Top 300 2017 financial data. towards meeting this goal. Three cases in particular related to SDG 8 are explored within the report: Up Groupe (France), KRIB- This year we have included additional data collection: HCO (India), and SOK (Finland). These cases present initiatives employment figures, cooperative type, and classification that cooperatives have implemented not only internally, but in of economic activity. The changes are discussed more ful- the community and along entire supply chains. ly in the methodology section, but our aim is to go beyond the Top 300 ranking based on turnover to explore more We would especially like to thank all of the contributors and fully the dynamics of the cooperative movement.
  • Promoting Cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece Sep

    Promoting Cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece Sep

    International Organisation of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers’ Cooperatives A sectoral organisation of the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) Promoting cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece _____________________________________________ How to promote the social economy in Greece through social cooperatives, worker cooperatives, and cooperatives of artisans and of SMEs Final report to the ILO September 9, 2013 1 2 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Introduction by Bruno Roelants, CICOPA Secretary General 5 PART 1. THE SITUATION IN GREECE 7 1.1. The s ocial impact of the crisis 7 1.2. Evolution and s tate o f the art of cooperatives and the social economy in Greece 9 1.3. Analysis of the existing relevant legislation 15 PART 2. MAIN RELEVANT NATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN THE CICOPA NETWORK THAT COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE GREEK CONTEXT 20 2.1. T he CICOPA network 20 2.2 Social services, with a special focus on crèches and homes for the elderly 22 2.3 . Business transfers to the employees under the worker cooperative form 25 2.4. Cooperatives among artisans, profess ionals and micro -enterprises 31 2. 5. The production of renewable energy by cooperatives 33 2. 6. Constitution of cooperative incubators 35 2. 7. Financial instruments for the development of cooperatives 36 2.8 . Constitution of networks, groups and consor tia 41 2. 9. Worker and social cooperatives in rural contexts 46 2.1 0. Multi -stakeholder cooperatives 49 2.1 1. Mixed and transitional forms of cooperatives 50 2.1 2. Cooperatives and emerging sectors: tourism 51 2.1 3. Worker coop eratives dealing with specific social challenges 53 PART 3.
  • The Power of Financial Cooperatives

    The Power of Financial Cooperatives

    ILO Cooperative Branch MEETING SUMMARY RESILIENCE IN A DOWNTURN: THE POWER OF FINANCIAL COOPERATIVES 26 October 2012 - International Labour Office, Geneva (Switzerland) BACKGROUND A presentation and discussion of the study, Resilience in a downturn: The Power of financial cooperatives was held at ILO headquarter in Geneva on 26 October 2012. The objective of the meeting was to: • Share research and engage in discussions on the resilience of the cooperative model of enterprise in the financial sector with ILO professionals – knowledge sharing, and • Seek input from a panel of financial cooperative experts on the study in view of finalizing the study for publication – peer review The meeting was part of a series of event being held at the ILO for United Nations International Year of Cooperatives 2012. MEETING SUMMARY The meeting was opened by Ms Simel Esim, Chief of the ILO Cooperative Branch who welcomed participants and introduced the report within the frame of International Year of Cooperatives. She noted major contributions from cooperative stakeholders to the International Year in terms of research, policy reviews, events which were culminating in plans for follow-up to the year. Specific mention was made of the Declaration of the International Cooperative Summit recently held in Quebec (Canada) and the International Cooperative Alliance’s (ICA) Blueprint for a Cooperative Decade both of which will be presented for adoption at the ‘Cooperatives United’ event being held in Manchester (UK). Prof Johnston Birchall of Stirling University (UK) introduced his study (see annex for PowerPoint slides). He briefly introduced what financial cooperatives were and how they were organized (networks and federations).
  • Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership: the Emilia Romagna Model – in More Detail

    Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership: the Emilia Romagna Model – in More Detail

    Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership http://dept.kent.edu/oeoc/oeoclibrary/emiliaromagnalong.htm Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership: The Emilia Romagna model – in more detail John Logue There are at least two European models for employee ownership that demand American attention. The one is the Mondragon cooperative group in the Basque region of Spain which has been frequently discussed in American employee ownership circles (see, for instance, “Lessons of Mondragon’s Employee-Owned Network,”Owners at Work XII:1, 5-9 and “From Mondragon to Ohio,” Owners at Work XIII:1, 16-17). The other is the much less well known complex of employee-owned companies in the Emilia Romagna region in Northern Italy around Bologna. I had the good fortune to take a week’s study trip to the employee-owned sector in Northern Italy this last summer with a delegation from the Boston-based Cooperative Charitable Trust to see the Emilian model first hand. In some ways, Emilia Romagna and the Basque co-ops are very different. In the Basque region, the Mondragon employee cooperatives grew out of Catholic social teaching and Basque nationalism in the 1950s and 1960s. In Emilia Romagna, by contrast, the co-ops grew up with the 19th century labor movement but split into three different partisan political federations -- Catholic, Socialist/Communist, and Social Democratic/Republican -- in the 20th century. They have no link to ethnic or linguistic minorities. In other ways, they are very similar. Both appear to owe their success today to a combination of small scale, flexible employee-owned firms which achieve economies of scale to compete globally through collaborative research and development strategies, cooperative export efforts, their own financial institutions, and other forms of collaboration and cooperation that are largely or completely missing in the employee-owned sector in the US.
  • United States Worker Cooperative Federation, 3Rd Biennial National Conference Steve Dubb, Democracy Collaborative, University of Maryland

    United States Worker Cooperative Federation, 3Rd Biennial National Conference Steve Dubb, Democracy Collaborative, University of Maryland

    United States Worker Cooperative Federation, 3rd Biennial National Conference Steve Dubb, Democracy Collaborative, University of Maryland www.community-wealth.org Worker Co-op Gathering Highlights Sector Innovations Approximately 200 worker co-op member-owners and technical assistance providers came together for the third national conference of the United States Federation of Worker Cooperatives, held in New Orleans, Louisiana from June 20th through June 22nd. The conference, which is held every two years, marked the fourth anniversary of the worker co-op federation. This year’s event was focused on three primary themes: 1) worker co-op innovations, with a focus on the host city of New Orleans, 2) the contribution of worker co-ops to community building, and 3) international developments. On the first day of the conference, a panel organized by Jessica Gordon Nembhard of the Center on Race and Wealth at Howard University, labeled “Showcase of Cooperatives,” highlighted some emerging worker co-op models. For instance, Tim Huet of Arizmendi, based in the San Francisco Bay Area, discussed his group’s efforts to act as a developer of a chain of worker co- ops, based on the example provided by the 40-year old Cheesboard bakery and pizzeria worker co-op in Berkeley. Arizmendi was launched in 1997 to provide development and support for cooperatives to launch new businesses, as well as do meeting facilitation, bookkeeping, and legal work for co-ops. To date, a total of four worker bakery co-ops have been established in the Bay Area. All four Arizmendi co-ops contribute 25% of their profits to the association to support the development of additional worker co-ops.
  • Canadian Worker Cooperative Federation Fédération Canadienne Des Coopératives De Travail

    Canadian Worker Cooperative Federation Fédération Canadienne Des Coopératives De Travail

    Canadian Worker Cooperative Federation Fédération Canadienne des Coopératives de Travail August 4, 2017 To: House Standing Committee on Finance Re: Pre-budget consultations, 2018 budget How Worker Co-operatives Can Contribute to Improving Canada’s Productivity, Competitiveness and Resilience Executive Summary Employee-owned co-operatives are effective, competitive enterprises. Employee ownership has inherent benefits including improved productivity as people have an ownership stake, and ability to create jobs in economically challenged regions. The USA and Europe have far more employee-owned enterprises than does Canada, per capita. Canada has not yet realized its potential for increasing productivity through developing this form of enterprise. Our recommendations are as follows. 1) Create a Co-op Business Succession program and support worker co-op development. 2) Restore pre-2011 Co-op RRSP rules. 3) Provide distinctive tax treatment for indivisible reserves. 4) Invest in the Canadian Co-operative Investment Fund. 5) Implement CWCF’s Climate Change Statement. What are Worker Co-operatives? Worker co-operatives are business enterprises that are owned and democratically controlled by their worker-owners. Their purpose is to provide a work environment that supports professional and human development, and pays competitive wages and benefits. Worldwide, they operate using the seven Co-operative Principles recognized by the International Co-operative Alliance. Worker Co-ops Are More Productive than Conventional Businesses Employee-owned co-operatives enhance productivity. Because the enterprise belongs to the employees, they participate directly in business decisions and they share in the resulting profits. This provides a built-in motivation for member-owners to operate the business effectively and #104, 402 – 30 Ave NE Calgary, AB T2E 2E3 tel: (403) 276-8250 / fax: (403) 338-0226 www.canadianworker.coop [email protected] efficiently, and in larger firms, eliminates the need for one - two levels of supervisory management.