Small Carnivores and Other Mammals in a Small Protected Area of 50 Km 2 in Thong Pha Phum Forest ,Western Thailand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Small Carnivores and Other Mammals in a Small Protected Area of 50 Km 2 in Thong Pha Phum Forest ,Western Thailand NAT. NAT. Hl ST. BULL. SIAM Soc. 54 (1): 13 9- 153 , 2006 SMALL CARNIVORES AND OTHER MAMMALS IN A SMALL PROTECTED AREA OF 50 KM 2 IN THONG PHA PHUM FOREST ,WESTERN THAILAND Nopphadol Prayon g' and Sompoad Srikosamat ll1 ・-tI ABSTRACT 百le s組制s of small camivores and other m anJm als in a small reserve (50 km 2 ) called “PIT Forest Reserves" in westem 百lailand w 鎚 S伽 died in parallel with human activities in 血e area. area. At least 17 wild m anJm al species were present in 也is 戸。 tec 飽d 紅 ea (PA) including 10 C 紅叫vore sμcies.τ 'h ecar 凶vo 陀 community in 血is 包 ea is dominated by viverrid s戸cies. 百le Lar ge In dian Civet (Viverra zibetha) w 錨出e most abundant ,followed by Small lndian Civet (Viverricula (Viverricula malaccensis) and Common Palm Civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus). Along fo 問 st edges ,percent visitations of the Large In dian Civet indicate that it is the dominant species. species. Abundance of Large In dian Civets w ぉ negatively and significantly correlated with dis 剛 ce to 恥 forest edge (r = -0品 2,P= 0.043). τ'h ere is a variety of human activity 泊曲is small PA. Frequencies of signs of Non- Timber Forest Forest pr 叫 ucts 例1下Ps) collecting and of domestic animals were significantly negatively correlated correlated with distance 加 m villages (r =ー 0.831 ,p = 0.006 and r = -0 .685 ,p = 0.042 , respectively). respectively). In con 甘舗t, the relation of distance 針。 m villages and hunting was not signific 釦 t. Domestic Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) were found in 血is forest ,especially in areas less 白an 1 km 針。 m 出 .e forest edge. 百時間sults of 血is s仙dy will be useful in motivating local participation in conservation. Cooperation Cooperation arnong local agencies and local people for conservation is now needed to s飽d co-conservation co-conservation management in 白is small protected area. 百le experience will be useful for improving improving wildlife conservation of 血e Westem 唄long Pha Ph um Ec osystem on the larger scale. scale. Key words: Small protected area , small camivores ,human activities ,wildlife conservation , 司副land. 問 τRODUCTION Most studies about camivores are aimed at increasing knowledge about the ecology of the the carnivore communities in tropical forests (EMMONS , 1987; RAY & SUNQUIST , 2001; MUK 田町田町 AL. , 2004). Some studies show important roles of camivores 泊 controlling prey populations ,decreasing competition wi 由加出e prey community ,and reducing seed predation (Gu 噌 RREZ ,ET AL ,1997 ,百悶ORGH ET AL. , 2001). However , there is little information about camivoie communities in disturbed forests and most studies come from temperate ecosystems (CROOKS , 2002; GEHR 町 G & SWIHART , 2003). IDep 紅 tment of Biology ,Faculty of Science ,M 油 idol Universi 旬, Rarna 6 Road ,Banl 詐ok 1倒 00 ,百 lail 釦 d Received Received 29 September 21 ∞ 5; accepted 15 June 2006. 139 139 140 140 NOPPI -IADO L PR A YONG AND SOMPOAD SR IKOSA ルIATA RA In In Thailand ,th 巴re are many factor s threat e ning wildlife ,巴 specially carnivores . There is almost no knowledge about carnivor 巴s m r 巴lation with human activities in the for 巴st. Most studie s on carnivores have been conducted in undi sturb ed for est within n ational parks and wildlife sanctuaries (RAB 町 O Wl TZ & WALKER , 1991 ; CONFORT I, 1996 ; GRASSMAN , 1999; 1999; GRASSMAN ET A L., 2005). Sma ll prot ected ar 巴as such as nat ional forest r巴S巴rves and other other disturbed forests ne 紅 hum an communities have bee n under va lued ,al though small carnivores carnivores can b巴 found in such pl aces. Information a bout such areas will incr ease our know1 巴dg 巴 about wi1dlife and may al so b巴 usefu l as a pilot s tudy for local particip a tion in co nservation ,espe cially in situati ons outside p arks and wi1dlif e sanctuari 巴s whel 巴 conservation must depend more on community action than on infl 巴xibl e law s (SRIKOSAMATARA & BROCKELMAN ,20 02) . In In this study , the status of sm all carn jvore s and other mammal s wa s studied in the PTT Fo rest Reserves of Western Thai1and for bett 巴r und ers tandin g of th 巴 char ac teristic s of th e carnivore carnivore community in disturbed for 巴st. At th e same tim e,s ig ns of human activities were a1 so analyzed for assessing human di stur bance and it s effect on th e wild1ife community. STU D Y AREA A forest 1巴S巴rve fo r cons 巴rvation was propo se d by the Petroleum Authority of Thailand (PTT) in 1999 , in collaboration with the Royal Forest Department (at that time) , through ヰ - PTI Fore stR 巴serv e EコTP P Na ti onal Park s [J] WPAC 田町 Dam Figur e 1. Lo ca tion of PTI Forest Reserves (PTIF) in th e We st ern Prot 巴cted Area Co mp l巴X _ SMA LL CARN IVORES AN D OTHE R MAMMA LS IN T H ONG PH A PH UM 141 2 0 2 4 Kilometers ・・・・・・・・・・ z一一一 一一一一一、 Stream w キE N Tr ack station line s 亡コ P甘 F .. .. Vi llages Fi gur e 2. PTTF and Villa g巴s around th e fores l. Th ere 白 e 9 lin 巴 surv eys in th es tudy (A -I) ,7 in PTTF and 2 in in TPPNP 142 142 NOPPHADOL I'RA YONG 釧 D SOMPOAD S RlK ωAMAT. 組 A 血e Regional Forest Au 血ority. 百世 swasap 紅 t of the post -environmen ta1泊 lpact assessment (EIA) responsibility of P1T after construction of 也e Yadana natural gas pipel 泊e 合om Myanm 低 Officially ,it is now a forest reserve under the National Forest Reserve Act of 1964. 1964. It is a small prot 即 ted area about 50 km 2 located 加side the boundary of Western 百lO ng Pha Phum Forest (W τ'P P) , which is ap 制 of the Western Forest Complex (F ig. 1). A tempor. 釘 y boundary has been demarcated by P1T to designate it as a protected 釘 ea. P1T has an interest in conserving the forest and wildlife , and in developing the well-being of of local villagers around the forest (Pe 位oleum Au 血ority of 百回land ,2002). P1T Forest Reserves (P1TF) are located at 出e boundary of WTPP Fores t.百世 s PA is is sep 釘 'ated by a dirt road and some crop fields into two p副 s: about 30 km 2 of lower P1TF and 20 km 2 of upper PT1下 (Fig. 2). Th e elevation range 加出is protected area is 160 ー945 m asl ,出 .e upperp 釘 t being the steepes t. About 50% of the upper part h部 a slope more 血an 30 degr 田 s. 百le P1TF covers 曲ree watersheds: Huai Kh ayeng , Huai Pr acham Mai ,加d Huai B 佃 Rai. 百le forest is mainly Mixed Deciduous Forest with some 釘 'eas of Dry Dipterocarp and Tropical Dry Forest , most rather disturbed. 官le PTI 下 is close to six villages 泊 Tambon Huai Kayeng (Fig. 2). MA'τERIALS AND METHODS Observation Observation of Small Carnivores and Other Mammals During During March 20 04- January 2005 ,wildlife surveys were conducted in 9 study sites , 7 sites 泊P1TF and 2 sites 泊τ'P PNP (A-I ,Fig. 2). 百le study focused on small carnivores , but but other mammals were also observed and noted. 百le methods used were relatively s泊lple ,and potentially useful by local agencies p制 icipat 泊g with local people in wildlife conservation conservation managemen t. Track Track stations were the main method for assessing abundance and diversity of small carnivores. carnivores. In白 is s旬dy , one 2・km line 釘ansect was set up in each of 9 study sites dis 凶 buted in P1TF and some 紅 e錨 of TPPNP (F ig. 2). Track stations 1m 2 加釘'ea and 100 100 m ap 訂 t were made along the transects. 百le surface of each station was made smooth 組 d soft by sieving the soil. Banana and fおshly caught fish av ai1 able in 血e area were bait 吋 on the stations. 百 le stations were checked the following 2 mornings and 出.en tracks in in the soil surface were IlX ed. Species were identified 企om tracks using The Mammal Tracks Tracks 01 Thailand (0 阻 EN WORLD FOUNDA' 百 ON ,1997) , and Carnivores 01 Mainland South South East Asia (KANCHANASAKHA. Er AL. , 1998). Camera 回 ps (Passive CamTrakker , CamTrack South ,In c. ,U.S. A.) were a1 so set up at various stations to determine species that that visited , using 360 station ・凶 ghts (40 station-nights/site) ,280 泊P1TF and80 泊τ'P PNP. Relative Relative abundance was calculated from 回 p success/ 回 p- 凶ght x 100. Trap success was derived 合om the number of 住'ack stations that 創由 nals visi 飽d. Intensive Intensive surveys of wildlife were also carried out wi 血泊P1T Forest Reserves. Signs Signs of wildlife on human 佐'ai1 s and wildlife trails within study 釘 e邸 were observed. Th e presence of carnivore and other mammal signs such as scats ,scrapes and tracks etc. W 部 recorded. Although 由is method is rough , the results can provide a general picture of of the diversity and status of mammals 泊出is P A. Six camera traps were also set up within within P1TF. However ,出 is method was not suitable in 白is study due to high human SMALL CARNIVORES AND OTHER MAMMALS 別 THONG PHA PHUM 143 disturbance.
Recommended publications
  • Panthera Pardus, Leopard
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T15954A5329380 Panthera pardus, Leopard Assessment by: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser- Wursten, C. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser-Wursten, C. 2008. Panthera pardus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T15954A5329380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T15954A5329380.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Taxon Name: Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym(s): • Felis pardus Linnaeus, 1758 Regional Assessments: • Mediterranean Infra-specific Taxa Assessed: • Panthera pardus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Evidence of Desert Cat Felis Silvestris Ornata and Caracal
    [VOLUME 5 I ISSUE 4 I OCT. – DEC. 2018] e ISSN 2348 –1269, Print ISSN 2349-5138 http://ijrar.com/ Cosmos Impact Factor 4.236 Photographic evidence of Desert cat Felis silvestris ornata and Caracal Felis caracal using camera traps in human dominated forests of Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India Raju Lal Gurjar* & Anil Kumar Chhangani Department of Environmental Science, Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner- 334001 (Rajasthan) *Email: [email protected] Received: July 04, 2018 Accepted: August 22, 2018 ABSTRACT We recorded movement of Desert cat Felis silvestris ornata and Caracal Felis caracal using camera traps in human dominated corridors from Ranthambhore National Park to Kailadevi Wildlife Sanctuary, Western India. We obtained 9 caracal captures and one Desert cat capture in 360 camera trap nights. Our findings revels that presence of both cat species outside park in corridors was associated with functionality of corridor as well as availability of prey. Further the forest patches, ravines and undulating terrain supports dispersal of small mammals too. Desert cat and Caracals were more active late at night and during crepuscular hours. There was a difference in their activity between dusk and dawn. Since this is its kind of observation beyond parks regime we genuinely argue for conservation of corridors and its protection leads us to conserve both large as well as small cats in the region. Keywords: Desert Cat, Caracal, Camera Trap, Ranthambhore National Park, Kailadevi Wildlife Sanctuary INTRODUCTION India has 11 species of small cats besides the charismatic big cats like tiger Panthera tigris, leopard Panthera pardus, Snow leopard Panthera uncia and Asiatic lion Panthera leo persica.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019
    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019 ISBN 978-9937-8522-8-9978-9937-8522-8-9 9 789937 852289 National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Hariyo Kharka, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal National Trust for Nature Conservation P.O. Box: 3712, Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 183, Kaski, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5526571, 5526573, Fax: +977-1-5526570 Tel: +977-61-431102, 430802, Fax: +977-61-431203 Annapurna Conservation Area Project Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntnc.org.np Website: www.ntnc.org.np 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Published by © NTNC-ACAP, 2019 All rights reserved Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit NTNC-ACAP. Reviewers Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah (Himalayan Nature), Dr. Naresh Subedi (NTNC, Khumaltar), Dr. Will Duckworth (IUCN) and Yadav Ghimirey (Friends of Nature, Nepal). Compilers Rishi Baral, Ashok Subedi and Shailendra Kumar Yadav Suggested Citation Baral R., Subedi A. & Yadav S.K. (Compilers), 2019. Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal. First Edition : 700 Copies ISBN : 978-9937-8522-8-9 Front Cover : Yellow-bellied Weasel (Mustela kathiah), back cover: Orange- bellied Himalayan Squirrel (Dremomys lokriah).
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunity for Thailand's Forgotten Tigers: Assessment of the Indochinese Tiger Panthera Tigris Corbetti and Its Prey with Camera-Trap Surveys
    Opportunity for Thailand's forgotten tigers: assessment of the Indochinese tiger Panthera tigris corbetti and its prey with camera-trap surveys E RIC A SH, Ż ANETA K ASZTA,ADISORN N OOCHDUMRONG,TIM R EDFORD P RAWATSART C HANTEAP,CHRISTOPHER H ALLAM,BOONCHERD J AROENSUK S OMSUAN R AKSAT,KANCHIT S RINOPPAWAN and D AVID W. MACDONALD Abstract Dramatic population declines threaten the En- Keywords Bos gaurus, distribution, Dong Phayayen-Khao dangered Indochinese tiger Panthera tigris corbetti with ex- Yai Forest Complex, Indochinese tiger, Panthera tigris tinction. Thailand now plays a critical role in its conservation, corbetti, prey abundance, Rusa unicolor, Sus scrofa as there are few known breeding populations in other Supplementary material for this article is available at range countries. Thailand’s Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai For- doi.org/./S est Complex is recognized as an important tiger recovery site, but it remains poorly studied. Here, we present results from the first camera-trap study focused on tigers and im- plemented across all protected areas in this landscape. Our Introduction goal was to assess tiger and prey populations across the five protected areas of this forest complex, reviewing discernible he tiger Panthera tigris has suffered catastrophic de- patterns in rates of detection. We conducted camera-trap Tclines in its population (%) and habitat (%) over surveys opportunistically during –. We recorded the past century (Nowell & Jackson, ; Goodrich et al., , detections of tigers in , camera-trap nights. ; Wolf & Ripple, ). Evidence suggests only source Among these were at least adults and six cubs/juveniles sites (i.e. sites with breeding populations that have the po- from four breeding females.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal
    SMALL CARNIVORES IN TINJURE-MILKE-JALJALE, EASTERN NEPAL The content of this booklet can be used freely with permission for any conservation and education purpose. However we would be extremely happy to get a hard copy or soft copy of the document you have used it for. For further information: Friends of Nature Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 23491 Email: [email protected], Website: www.fonnepal.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/fonnepal2005 First Published: April, 2018 Photographs: Friends of Nature (FON), Jeevan Rai, Zaharil Dzulkafly, www.pixabay/ werner22brigitte Design: Roshan Bhandari Financial support: Rufford Small Grants, UK Authors: Jeevan Rai, Kaushal Yadav, Yadav Ghimirey, Som GC, Raju Acharya, Kamal Thapa, Laxman Prasad Poudyal and Nitesh Singh ISBN: 978-9937-0-4059-4 Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Zaharil Dzulkafly for his photographs of Marbled Cat, and Andrew Hamilton and Wildscreen for helping us get them. We are grateful to www.pixabay/werner22brigitte for giving us Binturong’s photograph. We thank Bidhan Adhikary, Thomas Robertson, and Humayra Mahmud for reviewing and providing their valuable suggestions. Preferred Citation: Rai, J., Yadav, K., Ghimirey, Y., GC, S., Acharya, R., Thapa, K., Poudyal, L.P., and Singh, N. 2018. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal. Friends of Nature, Nepal and Rufford Small Grants, UK. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal Why Protect Small Carnivores! Small carnivores are an integral part of our ecosystem. Except for a few charismatic species such as Red Panda, a general lack of research and conservation has created an information gap about them. I am optimistic that this booklet will, in a small way, be the starting journey of filling these gaps in our knowledge bank of small carnivore in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • • Thailand 18 – 30 November 2013 Phil Telfer +
    x Thailand 18th ʹ 30th November 2013 Phil Telfer + Mark Bibby. A quick summary of a twelve day search for mammals in North and Central Thailand guided by Rattapon Kaichid ( known as Tu ) who together with his wife Jan runs Nature Focus Thailand, they can be very highly recommended. Many thanks to Jon Hall for their email contact which is [email protected] Tu is a really nice guy to ƚƌĂǀĞůǁŝƚŚ͕ŚĞ͛ƐĂŶĞdžĐĞůůĞŶƚĂůů-round wildlife guide and his connections help smooth the way in many of the national parks. Based on our target species, Tu and Jan put together the following itinerary: x Three days ʹ Huai Kha Khaeng wildlife sanctuary x Three days - Khao Yai national park x Four days ʹ Kaeng Krachan national park x One day ʹ Salt pans for Spoon-billed sandpiper x One day ʹ Ban Tha Kham bay for Irawaddy dolphin and Finless porpoise This was quite easy going, giving us a fair bit of time in each of the main centres. I think we did very well scoring 43 species with good views of most of these although we had no luck with any of the mega mammals such as Clouded leopard, Marbled cat, Golden cat or Sun bear which are all possibles and seen from time to time. A couple of weeks before our visit a group had seen a Golden cat catching a dove in front of one of the bird blinds. A Sun bear had been seen crossing the road one morning near the top of the mountain at Kaeng Krachan and a group that arrived there at the same time as us went on to see a Binturong an hour or so later.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus) and Its Extinct Eurasian Populations Johanna L
    Paijmans et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018) 18:156 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1268-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct Eurasian populations Johanna L. A. Paijmans1* , Axel Barlow1, Daniel W. Förster2, Kirstin Henneberger1, Matthias Meyer3, Birgit Nickel3, Doris Nagel4, Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller5, Gennady F. Baryshnikov6, Ulrich Joger7, Wilfried Rosendahl8 and Michael Hofreiter1 Abstract Background: Resolving the historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) is a complex issue, because patterns inferred from fossils and from molecular data lack congruence. Fossil evidence supports an African origin, and suggests that leopards were already present in Eurasia during the Early Pleistocene. Analysis of DNA sequences however, suggests a more recent, Middle Pleistocene shared ancestry of Asian and African leopards. These contrasting patterns led researchers to propose a two-stage hypothesis of leopard dispersal out of Africa: an initial Early Pleistocene colonisation of Asia and a subsequent replacement by a second colonisation wave during the Middle Pleistocene. The status of Late Pleistocene European leopards within this scenario is unclear: were these populations remnants of the first dispersal, or do the last surviving European leopards share more recent ancestry with their African counterparts? Results: In this study, we generate and analyse mitogenome sequences from historical samples that span the entire modern leopard distribution, as well as from Late Pleistocene remains. We find a deep bifurcation between African and Eurasian mitochondrial lineages (~ 710 Ka), with the European ancient samples as sister to all Asian lineages (~ 483 Ka). The modern and historical mainland Asian lineages share a relatively recent common ancestor (~ 122 Ka), and we find one Javan sample nested within these.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Borneo, Malaysia) 2019 October 7Th-31St Lennart Verheuvel
    Tripreport Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia) 2019 October 7th-31st Lennart Verheuvel www.shutterednature.com Sabah October 7th till October 31st. This was the second part of the trip I had planned to do after my studies were finished. Initially the plan was to go to Borneo for three months, I actually have asked for advice on the forum of Mammalwatching.com for that. Later I decided to change my mind and go for South-America, even later I decided to go for a combo: first three months South-America and then three weeks in Borneo. The road to Borneo was a long and bumpy one and I also ran into some difficulties during the trip, but in the end it was all worth it. The funny thing was that literally a week before my plane left, I still wasn’t sure if I could go, so looking back I’m really glad it all worked out. I travelled by myself but I did the first thirteen days of the trip together with Duncan McNiven and Debbie Pain from England and later we did our first five nights in Deramakot with Stuart Chapman and Nick Cox. It was nice searching for mammals (and birds) with these guys and it was really cool that the four of use managed to see Clouded Leopard together on one of the last nights of Stuart and Nick. I did fly on Tawau, which is not the nearest airport if you want to go to Danum but that was because I was first supposed to go with someone else, who backed out last minute and it was too expensive to change the destination.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivores
    SMALL CARNIVORES IN TINJURE-MILKE-JALJALE, EASTERN NEPAL The content of this booklet can be used freely with permission for any conservation and education purpose. However we would be extremely happy to get a hard copy or soft copy of the document you have used it for. For further information: Friends of Nature Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 23491 Email: [email protected], Website: www.fonnepal.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/fonnepal2005 First Published: April, 2018 Photographs: Friends of Nature (FON), Jeevan Rai, Zaharil Dzulkafly, www.pixabay/ werner22brigitte Design: Roshan Bhandari Financial support: Rufford Small Grants, UK Authors: Jeevan Rai, Kaushal Yadav, Yadav Ghimirey, Som GC, Raju Acharya, Kamal Thapa, Laxman Prasad Poudyal and Nitesh Singh ISBN: 978-9937-0-4059-4 Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Zaharil Dzulkafly for his photographs of Marbled Cat, and Andrew Hamilton and Wildscreen for helping us get them. We are grateful to www.pixabay/werner22brigitte for giving us Binturong’s photograph. We thank Bidhan Adhikary, Thomas Robertson, and Humayra Mahmud for reviewing and providing their valuable suggestions. Preferred Citation: Rai, J., Yadav, K., Ghimirey, Y., GC, S., Acharya, R., Thapa, K., Poudyal, L.P., and Singh, N. 2018. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke -Jaljale, Eastern Nepal. Friends of Nature, Nepal and Rufford Small Grants, UK. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal Why Protect Small Carnivore! Small carnivores are an integral part of our ecosystem. Except for a few charismatic species such as Red Panda, a general lack of research and conservation has created an information gap about them. I am optimistic that this booklet will, in a small way, be the starting journey of filling these gaps in our knowledge bank of small carnivore in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yellow-Throated Marten Martes Flavigula Carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula Indica
    A Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica Babu Ram LAMICHHANE1*, Chiranjibi Prasad POKHERAL1, Ambika Prasad KHATIWADA1, Rama MISHRA2 and Naresh SUBEDI1 Abstract Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula has a wide geographic distribution, but little is known about its ecology and behaviour. A camera-trap survey in and around Chitwan National Park, Nepal, photographed a solitary Marten carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica. The animal was in a grassland patch amid Sal Shorea robusta forest. It is unclear whether the Marten killed the Civet. Recent camera-trap surveys suggest that Yellow-throated Marten is widespread in Chitwan NP with records from altitudes of 190–675 m; many records are from Sal forest. Keywords: camera-trap, Chitwan National Park, behaviour, distribution, intra-guild carnivore predation, locality records, Nepal, Sal forest मऱसाप्रोऱे सानो ननरबिराऱो आहाराको 셁पमा 쥍याईरहेको बौगोलरक वितयणऺेत्र ठू रो बएताऩनन भरसाप्रोको आननफानीको फायेभा थोयैभात्र जानाकायी यहेको छ। मसि셍ष (२०७० सारभा) 啍माभया ट्रमावऩङ प्रविधधको प्रमोग गयी गरयएको सिेऺणको क्रभभा सारिनरे घेरयएको घाॉसे भैदान ऺेत्रभा भरसाप्रोरेए啍रै एउटा िम�क ननयबफयारो 쥍माईयहेको पोटो खिचेको धथमो। पोटोको आधायभा भात्र उ啍त भरसाप्रोरे ननयबफयारो भायेको हो कक होईन एककन गनष सककएन। मसैगयी ऩनछ쥍रा केही ि셍षभा गरयएका 啍माभेया ट्रमावऩङ सिेऺणको क्रभभा धचतिनको धेयैजसो ऺत्रे भा भरसाप्रोरे विचयण गने गयेको य १९० देखि ६७५ लभटय स륍भको उचाईभा ऩाईएको धथमो। भरसाप्रोको पोटो खिधचएका धेयैजसो ठाउॉ सारिन ऺत्रे भा ऩदषछन।् Introduction riverine and mixed hardwood), 12% grassland, 5% exposed surface and 3% water bodies (Thapa 2011).
    [Show full text]